So, in related news - it appears Fleshbot has spun off from Gawker Media. Content is still on the Gawker servers, but no longer linked in the Gawker-network site links.
All cameras, all artists, all forms of communication - objectify as well.
All beings objectify. Through the act of exercising the senses or even awareness, consciousness inherently forms oneself as the subject and one's surroundings as objects. The environment is the other, is filled with others.
I can't understand how there has been seemingly so little progress in elevating the discourse of "the male gaze." I've been out of school for quite some time, yet this mantra sounds awfully familiar.
Is no one else watching amateur porn (xtube and small studios)? I try to console myself with the notion that most of the videos I watch are made by people who actually enjoy the sex. Plus, real bodies.
As for women execs, I believe more should be asked of them and they could learn some lessons from some of the gay porn industry. I just read that two of my favorite sites offer awesome health care packages for higher tier "models."
On camera (where I'd really like to see some changes), it would be nice to see women having pleasurable sex and not see female bodies contorted for some guy's pleasure. (Also if someone could stop the combination of whiny/I'm so horny shrieks of "oh yeah"--the falseness distracts me and is one of the reasons that I hardly bother with videos that involve women).
Before I go off to cleanse my mind with Center Stage 2 let me just point out that it's not the result of porn movies that rape has been used as a tool of warfare in both Europe and Africa over the past 15 years. Sadly, they didn't need any help. The attitude needed was already there.
Maybe next time we'll actually talk about these women in positions of power and what they're doing, not doing and should be doing.
Given what the initial post is about I'm surprised there hasn't been more discussion about the obligation (if any) of the women in positions of power to change things. As Pilgrim Soul said, what's the point if you're just going to make the same shit men do? Because it's not going anywhere any time soon.
@Macloserboy: That would be an interesting conversation. I personally feel that yes they do have a responsibility at least attempt to change the industry. (that extends to anybody in power regardless of gender or industry) Unfortunately like you said, I don't see things changing anytime soon, after all there aren't that many people in the world willing to bite the hand that feeds them.
Which is why it's extremely important for men to get off our asses and start a sexual revolution of our own*. To learn that it's ok to say no, to learn that sex does not revolve solely around our desires, that women are sexual beings just like us with their own needs and desires to be respected.
*I consider the sexual revolution of the 60's and 70's to be solely a womens revolution since they were the only ones to change
I'm bummed that the article made no mention of Tristan Taormino. Now there's a woman with an adult empire. She started as an actress, then director. Then she wrote a few books, directed a bit more, and now she does just about everything. She has books out (and lectures) about open relationships, the bdsm and the swinger lifestyles, and anal sex. She's just begun designing sex toys, and (until recently) was a sex columnist for the Village Voice.
It seems she's been helping other women get a leg up in the industry as well--one of the actresses who has been in some of Tristan's films (Penny Flame) is now directing some educational dvds for Vivid, much like Tristan does.
@MsKatherineSpeaks: Yes she really shows you someone who seems to be promoting both women's sexual liberation and economic empowerment through porn. Much better example than any Hefner, although I don't mind the Hefners overmuch.
The pervasiveness of porn bothers me, the way I can see how people have internalized it's aesthetic and values. I know way too many young women who have sex for the sake of it because our culture doesn't portray female sexual desire but women as sexual objects or gatekeepers, anything but human beings with their own desires. I don't want to be an observer of much less a participant in another woman's objectification but that seems to put me in the minority. I don't think I'm a prude, I love sex I'm one of the lucky ones and have multiple orgasms on a regular basis. I'm not convinced that the two aren't linked, I feel avoiding porn has made my own sex life more authentic because I'm not as conscious of how I look or what I'm doing as I know I would be had I more of a preconceived notion of how sex should be. I worry about how much our attitudes are unconsciously shaped by the media we consume.
@J.D.Regent: I've read too much philosophy I guess, but it's something that's important to my whole construction of self, if I just go through the motions I feel like a fraud.
I'm going to relent on this one, a little. But not after I say this:
Throughout my life I have seen porno that's swung from extreme to bland and everything in between.
I grew up flipping through penthouse and hustler when I was taking a dump.
I went over to house parties where there would be some new, gross Jake Steed barf-fest to watch.
I've had slumber parties with other 20 year olds drinking champagne, popping pills and watching gay porn.
I've seen women squeal in agony at the SIZE and in pleasure too.
Some of it is sad, yes. Some of it is funny, and the tiniest of it (for me personally) is arousing. I don't care for porn because most of it is a schlock-fest of the highest degree.
I'd like to see what these women come up with. I'd like to see if they give a spectrum of the myriad quirks and preferences women have and hope a few of them aren't afraid to get dirty and raw, because there's nothing wrong with that.
I have to fully agree with what artfulslinger said "And my last point on this is that there is that some porn, while seemingly made just for men, appeals to a lot of women and I do not believe that is because of societal pressures. I believe most of us cant really help what gets us there."
Ugh the argument about porn and women will go on forever because all porn is not the same. Playboy is child's play in regards to today's porn standards and I don't see anything wrong with a few pretty ladies in their undies or less than that in a nice pictorial. When it comes to porn, there are virtually hundreds of types, where many sensationalize sex to the point of comedy or use women in such a way they are decoration, but really what porn is a tool for people to get off. Unfortunately, it takes some sick shit to get some people off and that is really where the problem lies.
I think I have a much bigger problem with women who participate in Suicide Girls than Playboy, because their value is much more diminished and they are not compensated at all equally, but that could be because their market share is much smaller and the business owners, which are some women, are much smarter at utilizing girls for less money.
And my last point on this is that there is that some porn, while seemingly made just for men, appeals to a lot of women and I do not believe that is because of societal pressures. I believe most of us cant really help what gets us there.
@odinsraven: Or, porn can be the input that shapes a person's sexuality, as in yvanehtnioj's example above. When that happens, it generally shapes the person into one who can't separate lust from misogyny, hate from desire.
Throwing Furries into this discussion is pretty disingenuous.
Maybe its just me, but I see a big distinction between Playboy or Perfect 10 and porn films. Most magazines with some noteable exceptions are just pitures of naked ladies. The can put pressure on women to be airbrushed, siliconed and shaved, but they don't bother me personally. Its just the human body.
Porn films on the other hand have strong misogynistic undertones. Calling women bitches and whores during sex acts that often don't even look enjoyable. Women as fucktoys with no sexual desires of their own. And I haven't even seen anything considered truly hardcore.
@J.D.Regent: To some extent I agree, but there's still the whole "this isn't a person, it's an object! Gaze away!" thing. Which I have a problem with. Because it's not really just the body, it's the female body, and it's marketed to and designed for and consumed by men. Men consuming women's bodies makes me feel nervous.
@Cimorene: do you feel that way about women used to sell other things to men, like say power tools or food or alcohol? Or when men are used to sell to women or to other men? I'm just wondering. I totally respect your viewpoint and I LOVE that there are so many feminists who feel strongly about this.
@J.D.Regent: Just to chime in here with my own opinion, I do very much dislike when women, and especially women's sexuality, is used to sell beer/food/cars to men. I also dislike it when women are used to sell shaving creams/underwear/organic yoghurt to other women by exploiting sexual insecurities about measuring up in attractiveness. I must admit, it doesn't bother me as much when men are used in a sexual manner to sell products to women (like those old Pepsi-construction-worker ads), which may make me a hypocrite, but I think in general objectifying men to sell products is still a novelty and isn't used as much as it is with women.
@Cimorene: I was thinking about this the other day, and just...you know, if a woman cries in a film, nobody says she's being turned into a sadness object. If she gets angry in a film, nobody says she's being turned into an anger object. So why, if she has sex (or even sexuality) in a film, is she being turned into a sex object? Why are "sex" and "human" mutually exclusive? What makes sex dehumanizing when other emotions and experiences are not?
I think the problem is the way we view sex, not the fact that we view it at all, you know?
So, I met Christie Hefner at a journalism event not too long ago (the Playboy Foundation gives out first amendment awards each year to deserving journalists and activists). Naturally, I was interested in what it must be like to be a powerful and wealthy woman heading up such an industry. So, after a little hesitation, I asked her privately how she reconciled being a female CEO of a company like Playboy, in a non-judgmental way. You'd think she would have been asked this question a hundred times in her career by now, and would have a pat answer - but no. She kinda flipped out at me, and accused me of being a prudish Republican (I'm not) who doesn't appreciate all that Playboy does for women worldwide, and said that most young women, unlike me, "get it." Which was really bizarre. Perhaps it means she hasn't made peace with it after all. But if all of the rest of the female porn execs respond to that question the way she did to me, by essentially accusing the questioner of being anti-feminist, I can understand why people might be a little judgy.
@giantsquids: You would think that at the very least, having probably been asked this question repeatedly over the years, she would have at least a pat answer to give, if not a really inciteful analysis.
And geez, her snappy response could have easily been printed!
She kinda flipped out at me, and accused me of being a prudish Republican (I'm not) who doesn't appreciate all that Playboy does for women worldwide, and said that most young women, unlike me, "get it".
this statement says far more about her than any interview in any magazine could.
i'm not surprised that women who work behind the scenes in porn don't have a problem with it because they are rolling in money. they make their money with the people who are "probably not" involved in more drug abuse or more suicides, or were "probably not" victims of sexual abuse as children...all these women did was find a way to make money doing it without having to actually be on camera. how dare we question the origins of their cash flow? because we just don't "get it".
@J.D.Regent: Totally, and I have issues with modeling as well, but I think it's the combination of women-as-commodity plus the focus on male pleasure/gratification above all else that really get my goat about porn. At least the clothes worn by models are ostensibly marketed towards women, you know?
@PilgrimSoul: and you don't see people freaking out about all modeling the way they do about porn modeling. it just seems that the objectification/commodification argument is a general critique of capitalism but it only really gets deployed when we're talking about selling SEX, not selling other things. that's what bothers me. and that's what makes people say it's prudish, when there are all these arguments that are applicable to all kinds of work that only get used to critique sex work or porn.
@J.D.Regent: I don't see why I'm responsible for this, though. I mean, the reason I don't tend to do it on Jez is that the fashion people get mad at me when I do it for daring to suggest theirs is anything but a truly worthwhile and aesthetically-challenging endeavour.
and also, to me at least, and we've talked about this before, there is a kind of sexuality that this stuff is selling that is not value neutral, i.e., usually it is selling sex as a transaction in which male ejaculation and organasm is the ultimate goal and the rest is just window dressing. so they are selling a product that, as a "thing-in-itself," is not "just sex."
@PilgrimSoul: i'm not saying you are responsible! in fact i find your scorched earth condemnation of all fashion and buying-things culture to be quite refreshing and consistent with your anti-porn stance. i agree that the kind of sex sold in most mainstream porn is boring and bad for women. but i do believe in the redemptive possibilities of sex work and porn and can't criticize them categorically any more than i could criticize the EXISTENCE of lumber or pharmaceutical companies, just their current modes of operation.
@J.D.Regent: well, we are more or less in agreement then, because I (like Catharine Mackinnon, haha, we'll see if that name gets someone riled up) don't think the concept of porn is evil. I think it's current mode of operation is.
@PilgrimSoul: like Catharine Mackinnon, haha, we'll see if that name gets someone riled up
You know, ever since I started a Facebook group called "I want to punch Catharine MacKinnon in the face and videotape it," I've been a lot more laid-back about her.
@egg cream: yeah I can't get behind your facebook group. Mostly it suggests to me that you haven't read very much of her or if you have, you have read in a lot of stuff that isn't there.
"Feminists talk a lot about owning our bodies and making our own sexual choices, but when it comes to women who choose to work in the sex industry, we tend to get a lot more narrow-minded about it. "
I'm not sure how I feel about feminist porn (which, ftr, isn't the same thing as porn-with-a-woman-executive porn). But I do know that mainstream porn, which is by far most porn, objectifies women, even if the women on-camera agree to be filmed (agree to be objectified, I'd argue). And it fetishizes lesbians, which is like my biggest pet peeve in the world.
And no, it's not the worst thing in the world. Certainly it's not worse than the women who are tricked, coerced, or raped for porn. But it still sucks for me, because every dude who watches porn that is created for dudes (most porn) watches stuff that ends up objectifying women. And that shit doesn't stop when you turn off the computer--when you objectify a woman (or minority) at 10 o'clock, the effects of said objectification--namely, the tendency to objectify all women--don't go away the next morning at your office when you're talking to your 22 year old assistant. And so porn basically perpetuates the cycle of objectification of women, and the reduction of us to the sum of our body parts. And I call bullshit on that.
Besides, maybe statistics show similar stats about suicide, drug use, and history of abuse* in other industries that similarly reduce women to their bodies, like hollywood, pop singers, and tv. But doesn't this site regularly call out Hollywood, the recording industry, and television companies for the sexism (and racism and classism) on a daily basis? I don't want to "exceptionalize" the porn industry, but neither do I want to privilege it because it has to do, primarily, with men's ease of masturbation. And even if feminist and woman-friendly porn (which, really? It ain't woman-friendly unless it's feminist) are not following this trajectory of objectification and explicit sexism, though I'd argue that any pornography inherently objectifies the sexual body and commodifies sex and the female body regardless of the socio-political intentions of the director and producer, those two aspects of porn are so, so, so depressingly small compared to porn-for-dudes.
That said, I am glad these women are making sure that girls aren't getting coerced or forced to perform sexual acts that they don't want to perform. It's admirable, especially in an industry that is rife with sexism on all sides. And it must be hard to take those stands when you've got a bottom line and an expanding market for gonzo or violent porn. But how low have our expectations gotten, that when someone is making sure that their workers aren't getting raped, they get a cookie? Like, isn't making sure that the people you hire are NOT sex slaves or otherwise coerced into the job you're having them do actually just the baseline of human decency? This world makes me cry.
*Which, how is that getting linked up with killing yourself and addiction? Addiction is desperation; suicide is the final straw of desperation. A history of abuse does not condemn you to a life of being fucked up. Though to minimize the consequences of childhood abuse is not what I'm doing here, I'm just saying that a woman who was abused or assaulted can still make her own decisions, which is not something I feel comfortable saying about an addict or suicidal person.
@Cimorene: These are some really great points, but is this an egg and chicken situation?
Men have been and will be objectifying women for years and while I can say there are certain things that are worse, I think "Girls Gone Wild" is worse than anything I have seen from the Vivid company. I think the fact that women have allowed this idea of what is sexy become true and run amok at Spring Break and make out with their friends for points with dudes is a problem with these women. Not to say that men aren't guilty of continuously perpetuating this shit on some women, but a great deal of chicks out there need to own what they do.
@ArtfulSlingerBARACKED THE VOTE: And let me be clear, my above comment has NOTHING to do with sexual abuse, addiction, etc. I am merely saying that there are many many many women out there equally guilty of entertaining those stereotypes for attention.
@Cimorene: I disagree with one thing, though. I think (hope?) that men are able to compartmentalize (is that even a word?) watching porn (as long as it's not totally vile, at least). I refuse to believe that the effect lingers and they see every woman as an orifice to penetrate. From what I've gathered from talking to my boyfriend about this, watching porn is just a way to get off quickly, nothing more. When the deed is done, that's it.
I, for one, don't like porn and the way it presents women but I think men are capable of seeing real world and pornography as two separate and very different things.
@Cimorene: This is excellent. Thanks especially for pointing out that woman in charge=/=feminist, and that not supervising a filmed rape should be a baseline of human decency.
@Southpaw: Most studies I have seen of pornography show that it has a huge and unconscious effect on the way the watcher interacts with the people around him or her. Actually all of the studies I have seen show this, but there aren't a lot of studies because the first really big one (studying porn and violence) ended up with results that were so harmful to the participants, because they became so violent and angry after they regularly watched violent porn, that most ethics committees that approve or disapprove human participants in studies like that won't approve studies on porn. Now, that's porn and violence. But it's easy to see how if violent porn makes the watcher violent, objectifying porn will make the watcher objectify. And all porn is objectifying.
There are levels of compartmentalization, but I do not believe that someone that masturbates habitually to pornography will not be affected by the pornography. I mean, it's like positive conditioning or something. Every time i see a woman on screen [getting objectified] I have an orgasm. So, I start to subconsciously associate objectifying women with orgasms. Not a big leap, in my opinion.
Some men, of course, compartmentalize better than others. But I don't actually care that much because I don't like it when any woman is objectified.
@Southpaw: I agree with you that I don't think every man who watches porn sees every woman in his daily life as a sex object (even subconsciously). This is obviously a complicated and nuanced topic, but I think it discredits plenty of kind, compassionate, rational, equality-seeking men as nothing but ravaging lusty hormones because they've seen porn.
@Southpaw: Trends in porn have had measurable effects on society, from removal of pubic hair and large, unnatural breast implants, to more men asking for unsafe and degrading acts, straight out of porn from their wives and girlfriends. One porn-loving guy I was with tried to convince me to do ass-to-mouth. Another guy had to have it explained to him that it's not sexy to me to have my vulva spit on and that putting on a porn and imitating the stuff on screen results in very little pleasure for me.
Ah, whatever. Good for them! Money is the key, and that is fine with me. Porn is fun for couples and single people, men and women alike. Porn is many hued, like Peter Cook as Satan said about God in Bedazzled!
I myself, don't have any inclination whatsoever to be IN porn, but I don't have a problem with those who do. I mean, wow. I've seen some straight-up misogynistic porn that is like a car accident: awful, but I can't help but look. I feel sorry for those chicks who have to endure gigantic dicks up their a-holes. Yikes.
Was it a Jane's Addiction song that said "Sex is violent!"? Well, I can attest that in my more or less normal and loving relationship, when I'm getting jack-hammered, that shit hurts sometimes! But it hurts so good. And, as far as I know, no one is watching my stupid oh ah O faces. Except for the aliens and ghosts, of course.
Where the hell am I going with this? I'm rambling like I've been throdding all day.
@SisterSonny: "I feel sorry for those chicks who have to endure gigantic dicks up their a-holes"
Yeah I feel sorry for them too. Especially when they are prostitutes hired through their pimps who rape and beat them frequently. I feel really sorry for those chicks. But you know, whatever! The conflation of sex and violence in our society has definitely had no ill effects, like it probably doesn't have anything to do with the very literal combination of sex and violence: rape. So we can just keep making jokes about how awesome light bondage is without a critical look at why our culture thinks that combining sex and violence is like, the height of sexy. Maybe it makes someone come, but WHY does it make them come?
Sex + Violence = (mainstream) porn = rape. It's just different points on the continuum of rape culture.
@Cimorene: Not always. God damn! Well, then take a stand! Do something about it! Don't buy it, don't watch it and protest. Or, have an opinion and voice it. But cripes, not everything is so fucking black and white.
And, no one knows why it makes them come, or whatever. Human beings have a lot of confliction and misfires. I don't go out there and shove dildos up strangers asses, and I certainly hope that never happens to me. I don't know what chick is getting raped in what porn. I don't know what is going through their minds, and neither do you, unless they come out and say so. Lina Lovelace came out and said things, so has Jenna Jameson.
Pick and choose your battles. Porn does no absolutely equal rape. Fuck.
@SisterSonny: I was talking about a continuum. Just like a dude who beats his girlfriend and one who murders his girlfriend after beating her--they are not the same thing, but they are on the same sliding scale of violence against women.
And you know, you're right. I don't know which women are getting raped and which ones aren't. That's why I don't watch porn, because what if I was masturbating to a woman getting raped? How fucked up and evil is that? And Linda Susan Boreman (Lovelace) came out and said that every time someone watched Debbie Does Dallas they were watching her get raped. And that's one of the highest grossing porn films of all times. Is this not an indication that porn as it stands now is a pretty fucked up medium?
And who the hell knows why anything gets anyone off--but when your need to get off impedes on my life, I don't care about your orgasm. Orgasms are less important than making sure that women are not getting exploited.
@SisterSonny: I'm pretty sure Cim doesn't buy porn, and here she is taking a stand. Sounds like you can't handle a polite and reasoned difference of opinion.
12/04/08
Anyone care to comment on that?
12/04/08
All beings objectify. Through the act of exercising the senses or even awareness, consciousness inherently forms oneself as the subject and one's surroundings as objects. The environment is the other, is filled with others.
I can't understand how there has been seemingly so little progress in elevating the discourse of "the male gaze." I've been out of school for quite some time, yet this mantra sounds awfully familiar.
12/03/08
As for women execs, I believe more should be asked of them and they could learn some lessons from some of the gay porn industry. I just read that two of my favorite sites offer awesome health care packages for higher tier "models."
On camera (where I'd really like to see some changes), it would be nice to see women having pleasurable sex and not see female bodies contorted for some guy's pleasure. (Also if someone could stop the combination of whiny/I'm so horny shrieks of "oh yeah"--the falseness distracts me and is one of the reasons that I hardly bother with videos that involve women).
12/03/08
Maybe next time we'll actually talk about these women in positions of power and what they're doing, not doing and should be doing.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
Which is why it's extremely important for men to get off our asses and start a sexual revolution of our own*. To learn that it's ok to say no, to learn that sex does not revolve solely around our desires, that women are sexual beings just like us with their own needs and desires to be respected.
*I consider the sexual revolution of the 60's and 70's to be solely a womens revolution since they were the only ones to change
12/03/08
It seems she's been helping other women get a leg up in the industry as well--one of the actresses who has been in some of Tristan's films (Penny Flame) is now directing some educational dvds for Vivid, much like Tristan does.
[/fangirl]
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
Throughout my life I have seen porno that's swung from extreme to bland and everything in between.
I grew up flipping through penthouse and hustler when I was taking a dump.
I went over to house parties where there would be some new, gross Jake Steed barf-fest to watch.
I've had slumber parties with other 20 year olds drinking champagne, popping pills and watching gay porn.
I've seen women squeal in agony at the SIZE and in pleasure too.
Some of it is sad, yes. Some of it is funny, and the tiniest of it (for me personally) is arousing. I don't care for porn because most of it is a schlock-fest of the highest degree.
I'd like to see what these women come up with. I'd like to see if they give a spectrum of the myriad quirks and preferences women have and hope a few of them aren't afraid to get dirty and raw, because there's nothing wrong with that.
I have to fully agree with what artfulslinger said "And my last point on this is that there is that some porn, while seemingly made just for men, appeals to a lot of women and I do not believe that is because of societal pressures. I believe most of us cant really help what gets us there."
12/03/08
12/03/08
I think I have a much bigger problem with women who participate in Suicide Girls than Playboy, because their value is much more diminished and they are not compensated at all equally, but that could be because their market share is much smaller and the business owners, which are some women, are much smarter at utilizing girls for less money.
And my last point on this is that there is that some porn, while seemingly made just for men, appeals to a lot of women and I do not believe that is because of societal pressures. I believe most of us cant really help what gets us there.
12/03/08
The Furry Convention was recently in town, and it just makes me think, "Hey, whatever works for you!"
12/03/08
Throwing Furries into this discussion is pretty disingenuous.
12/03/08
Porn films on the other hand have strong misogynistic undertones. Calling women bitches and whores during sex acts that often don't even look enjoyable. Women as fucktoys with no sexual desires of their own. And I haven't even seen anything considered truly hardcore.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
Also, this is why I'm obsessed with PBS.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
I think the problem is the way we view sex, not the fact that we view it at all, you know?
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
And geez, her snappy response could have easily been printed!
12/03/08
She kinda flipped out at me, and accused me of being a prudish Republican (I'm not) who doesn't appreciate all that Playboy does for women worldwide, and said that most young women, unlike me, "get it".
this statement says far more about her than any interview in any magazine could.
i'm not surprised that women who work behind the scenes in porn don't have a problem with it because they are rolling in money. they make their money with the people who are "probably not" involved in more drug abuse or more suicides, or were "probably not" victims of sexual abuse as children...all these women did was find a way to make money doing it without having to actually be on camera. how dare we question the origins of their cash flow? because we just don't "get it".
@Cimorene: bravo!
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
and also, to me at least, and we've talked about this before, there is a kind of sexuality that this stuff is selling that is not value neutral, i.e., usually it is selling sex as a transaction in which male ejaculation and organasm is the ultimate goal and the rest is just window dressing. so they are selling a product that, as a "thing-in-itself," is not "just sex."
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
You know, ever since I started a Facebook group called "I want to punch Catharine MacKinnon in the face and videotape it," I've been a lot more laid-back about her.
12/03/08
12/03/08
I'm not sure how I feel about feminist porn (which, ftr, isn't the same thing as porn-with-a-woman-executive porn). But I do know that mainstream porn, which is by far most porn, objectifies women, even if the women on-camera agree to be filmed (agree to be objectified, I'd argue). And it fetishizes lesbians, which is like my biggest pet peeve in the world.
And no, it's not the worst thing in the world. Certainly it's not worse than the women who are tricked, coerced, or raped for porn. But it still sucks for me, because every dude who watches porn that is created for dudes (most porn) watches stuff that ends up objectifying women. And that shit doesn't stop when you turn off the computer--when you objectify a woman (or minority) at 10 o'clock, the effects of said objectification--namely, the tendency to objectify all women--don't go away the next morning at your office when you're talking to your 22 year old assistant. And so porn basically perpetuates the cycle of objectification of women, and the reduction of us to the sum of our body parts. And I call bullshit on that.
Besides, maybe statistics show similar stats about suicide, drug use, and history of abuse* in other industries that similarly reduce women to their bodies, like hollywood, pop singers, and tv. But doesn't this site regularly call out Hollywood, the recording industry, and television companies for the sexism (and racism and classism) on a daily basis? I don't want to "exceptionalize" the porn industry, but neither do I want to privilege it because it has to do, primarily, with men's ease of masturbation. And even if feminist and woman-friendly porn (which, really? It ain't woman-friendly unless it's feminist) are not following this trajectory of objectification and explicit sexism, though I'd argue that any pornography inherently objectifies the sexual body and commodifies sex and the female body regardless of the socio-political intentions of the director and producer, those two aspects of porn are so, so, so depressingly small compared to porn-for-dudes.
That said, I am glad these women are making sure that girls aren't getting coerced or forced to perform sexual acts that they don't want to perform. It's admirable, especially in an industry that is rife with sexism on all sides. And it must be hard to take those stands when you've got a bottom line and an expanding market for gonzo or violent porn. But how low have our expectations gotten, that when someone is making sure that their workers aren't getting raped, they get a cookie? Like, isn't making sure that the people you hire are NOT sex slaves or otherwise coerced into the job you're having them do actually just the baseline of human decency? This world makes me cry.
*Which, how is that getting linked up with killing yourself and addiction? Addiction is desperation; suicide is the final straw of desperation. A history of abuse does not condemn you to a life of being fucked up. Though to minimize the consequences of childhood abuse is not what I'm doing here, I'm just saying that a woman who was abused or assaulted can still make her own decisions, which is not something I feel comfortable saying about an addict or suicidal person.
12/03/08
But how low have our expectations gotten, that when someone is making sure that their workers aren't getting raped, they get a cookie?
12/03/08
Men have been and will be objectifying women for years and while I can say there are certain things that are worse, I think "Girls Gone Wild" is worse than anything I have seen from the Vivid company. I think the fact that women have allowed this idea of what is sexy become true and run amok at Spring Break and make out with their friends for points with dudes is a problem with these women. Not to say that men aren't guilty of continuously perpetuating this shit on some women, but a great deal of chicks out there need to own what they do.
12/03/08
12/03/08
I, for one, don't like porn and the way it presents women but I think men are capable of seeing real world and pornography as two separate and very different things.
12/03/08
12/03/08
There are levels of compartmentalization, but I do not believe that someone that masturbates habitually to pornography will not be affected by the pornography. I mean, it's like positive conditioning or something. Every time i see a woman on screen [getting objectified] I have an orgasm. So, I start to subconsciously associate objectifying women with orgasms. Not a big leap, in my opinion.
Some men, of course, compartmentalize better than others. But I don't actually care that much because I don't like it when any woman is objectified.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/04/08
I'd love to see some sources cited for such studies.
12/03/08
I myself, don't have any inclination whatsoever to be IN porn, but I don't have a problem with those who do. I mean, wow. I've seen some straight-up misogynistic porn that is like a car accident: awful, but I can't help but look. I feel sorry for those chicks who have to endure gigantic dicks up their a-holes. Yikes.
Was it a Jane's Addiction song that said "Sex is violent!"? Well, I can attest that in my more or less normal and loving relationship, when I'm getting jack-hammered, that shit hurts sometimes! But it hurts so good. And, as far as I know, no one is watching my stupid oh ah O faces. Except for the aliens and ghosts, of course.
Where the hell am I going with this? I'm rambling like I've been throdding all day.
12/03/08
Yeah I feel sorry for them too. Especially when they are prostitutes hired through their pimps who rape and beat them frequently. I feel really sorry for those chicks. But you know, whatever! The conflation of sex and violence in our society has definitely had no ill effects, like it probably doesn't have anything to do with the very literal combination of sex and violence: rape. So we can just keep making jokes about how awesome light bondage is without a critical look at why our culture thinks that combining sex and violence is like, the height of sexy. Maybe it makes someone come, but WHY does it make them come?
Sex + Violence = (mainstream) porn = rape. It's just different points on the continuum of rape culture.
12/03/08
And, no one knows why it makes them come, or whatever. Human beings have a lot of confliction and misfires. I don't go out there and shove dildos up strangers asses, and I certainly hope that never happens to me. I don't know what chick is getting raped in what porn. I don't know what is going through their minds, and neither do you, unless they come out and say so. Lina Lovelace came out and said things, so has Jenna Jameson.
Pick and choose your battles. Porn does no absolutely equal rape. Fuck.
12/03/08
And you know, you're right. I don't know which women are getting raped and which ones aren't. That's why I don't watch porn, because what if I was masturbating to a woman getting raped? How fucked up and evil is that? And Linda Susan Boreman (Lovelace) came out and said that every time someone watched Debbie Does Dallas they were watching her get raped. And that's one of the highest grossing porn films of all times. Is this not an indication that porn as it stands now is a pretty fucked up medium?
And who the hell knows why anything gets anyone off--but when your need to get off impedes on my life, I don't care about your orgasm. Orgasms are less important than making sure that women are not getting exploited.
12/03/08
12/03/08