<![CDATA[Jezebel: nerve]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: nerve]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/nerve http://jezebel.com/tag/nerve <![CDATA[Used Underpants: The Last Refuge Of A Scoundrel]]> Clearly, someone does it: we've all shuddered at the used underpants in thrift stores and thought - who does that? Well, this time, it was Nerve's Meghan Pleticha, who Does It For Science.

Okay, there's used undies and used undies. There's "I'm not wearing panties" and then there's "period underwear." Anyone who has worked sorting donations at a thrift store has particularly strong feelings on the subject of used underwear. Especially dirty used underwear. (And while we're at it, how about not throwing in dirty disposable diapers? Whoever succeeded me at Help the Aged, Camden Town will thank you.) Even clean old underthings though are a relative proposition: grayed and frayed, with stained gossets and stretched elastics. Someone can use them, the thinking might go - but how about taking that generous impulse and translating it into the minimal expense of a three-pack of new jockeys?

We've all held onto undies past their prime. In my case, I find it very hard to throw out something that was at one time expensive and still feels "special" - especially if the matching bra is still operational. Throwing such things out can be hard (a few drinks helps) and donation may seem a viable alternative, but understand what was for you a romantic splurge, a compendium of daintiness and all things pretty and adult, is in fact a ratty scrap of synthetic lace now missing its bow. Launder and save those sets with maximum sentimental value and let the rest go. Into the trash. Then dump coffee grounds on them just in case you're tempted come laundry day.

There's the other side of the question: do people buy them? That's what Pleticha set out to discover. And she was on the other side of the dirty-drawers divide: Think less saggy jockeys than Sam Baker-Anthony-Michael-Hall in Sixteen Candles (recently reprised on Glee): a sexy lady's used undies are the stuff of fetish, right?

One of the girls [a friend] met at that party sold her panties on the site for $200 a pair. I'd heard rumors about this kind of thing for years, but here was proof it was possible. Two-hundred bucks for underwear? I wasn't up for posing in my panties, but I could totally do that! Unlike sex for money, selling used underwear didn't feel inherently sleazy or immoral. And sure, a guy buying panties online might seem a little off, but in the words of my friend the Craigslist gigolo, "Just because a guy's a panty-sniffer doesn't make him a bad person." After years of flirting with the idea, it was time for me to find out: can a girl make easy money off her dirty laundry? And how much money are we talking?

So she posts a Craigslist ad.

"I'm a college girl who just started school in the city and really need some cash for books and stuff. I have a bunch of panties I don't need any more - some are super-cute, some are kind of old! It's $25 for the not-so-nice pairs, but I have some more expensive lacy stuff too. Serious inquiries only please!"

Instead, dudes want head-shots and extras. Not shocking, maybe.

This was the sketchiness I was hoping to avoid, but I was desperate for a sale. I had posted my first ad nearly a week ago, my asking price had dropped from $100 to $40, but still no takers. I didn't like this kind of bartering. Not only do I suck at negotiating, but it was making me feel like a whore after all. I'd envisioned a wallet full of Benjamins and a drawer of new panties. I hadn't envisioned myself - and I'm cringing as I write this - making extravagant promises about how "juicy" my panties were. I was selling myself. It felt gross. I got very close to forgetting the whole thing.

She ultimately sells a few pair, but isn't sure the hassle is worth the money.

I still don't have a problem with the idea of selling my panties - if it were just that. But it's not. It's teasing and marketing myself, and ignoring upsetting propositions in the name of a buck. The e-mails are still coming in as my last Craigslist post is set to expire, but they're going unanswered. From here on out, I'll just have to do my laundry.

Well, I guess we know who buys those old panties at the SalVa! And, when you think of it that way, maybe it sort of is an act of charity? It's also maybe why only the granny-panties are left. Ew.

I Did It For Science: Selling Panties On Craigslist

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395342&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Birth Control Patch Leads To Barfing, Sometimes Death]]> Despite what drug company ads might tell us, birth control isn't all hot tubs and flirtinis. Actually, a lot of women have really terrible reactions to the myriad forms of no-baby elixir currently on the market, and on Nerve.com, Nicole Ankowski shares her particularly violent reaction to the Ortho-Evra patch. Four years ago Ankowski affixed the patch to her booty, and the 24-hours following turned into a hellish, moody painfest culminating in a puddle of barf on her corduroys while in high speed traffic. This is especially noteworthy because the patch had originally been marketed by Johnson & Johnson as a lower-estrogen birth control option, but as Ankowski notes, they were lying!

According to Ankowski, "The patch actually delivered much higher doses of estrogen than the pill; Johnson & Johnson failed to reveal this to the public for six years. At least fifty deaths have been attributed to the patch because of this, with thousands more women reporting alarming symptoms." Johnson & Johnson have already spent $68.7 million settling lawsuits from women who suffered blood clots, heart attacks and strokes after using the patch, and Feministing notes, there is evidence that Johnson & Johnson hid documents that showed the patch released more estrogen than originally thought.

That's patently terrifying! The only positive result of Ankowski's experience with the patch is that her boobs got enormous, which seems like a pretty tiny benefit when you're puking your guts out and maybe dying because of pharmaceutical phibs. I've always hated birth control and only used condoms, and I seem to be among the minority. BCP makes me moody and bloated and distinctly unlike myself. I finally got a diaphragm, but only because I asked for it. In my experience, doctors have been reticent to mention options that are not the tried-and-true birth control pills, so if you're someone who experiences massive side effects, be sure to do all your research before committing.

Rough Patch [Nerve]
Johnson & Johnson Spends Millions Settling Ortho Evra Lawsuits [Feministing]

Earlier: Sarah Haskins Wishes You Happy Period Control

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5062754&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[In The Mating Game, Women Spend On Grooming, Men Spend On Dates]]> They say the best things in life are free, but according to Nerve, sex has a very real cost. Nerve editors asked nine people — singletons, married people and non-wed couples alike — how much money they spend in and around getting in and around, from birth control to grooming to dates. The results were traditional in a way that shocked me. Women, even the married ones, tended to spend most of their cash on hair, make-up and clothing in order to make themselves attractive to get laid. Men tended to spend money on women — buying them drinks, meals and event tickets — to get laid.

The least stereotypical women that Nerve surveyed? "Granola Sunshine," a bisexual woman who tends to go dutch on her dates and the "Long-Distance Cougar" who, despite making only $25,000 a year, spent $115 on a hotel room to meet her 22-year-old lover, while he supplied the rubbers. But both those women are sort of stereotypical in not hewing to stereotypes, so maybe it doesn't count. Even crunchy "Granola Sunshine" spent "$30 for face products from The Body Shop, cooling avocado washes and toners; trying to look good and keep my skin young," while the men surveyed spent almost zero on grooming themselves. Both the single straight men in the survey, "Coffee Yupster" and the "Dude" spent a lot of money wooing women, whether it be on meals out or memberships to dating sites.

The saddest lady, though, was definitely "Mom of Two," who is overworked and under-laid. "I don't have much to tell you, sadly. I got a $25 bikini wax, and I think I got to use it all of once," she tells Nerve. "A few days later, she bought $240 worth of new clothes 'in order to keep my husband interested and attracted.' Later that week, she got a free pedicure at a promotional event: 'I chose a saucy red called 'Kiss the Cook,' to which my husband responded, 'I prefer it when you paint your toes pink or nude.'" Um, your husband sounds like sort of a dick? You went out of your way to dress up and all he can do is criticize your toenail choices?

[Image via Charles Phoenix]

Everyone Pays For Sex [Nerve]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056480&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dangerous Mind?]]> Dating confession of the day, via Nerve: "I would love to tell all the beautiful women I randomly see on the street how they look, but I don't want to come off as a perv." Really depends on what you mean by "how they look," doesn't it? [Nerve.com]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018012&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pot Psychology]]> potpsych5508.jpgNerve has another edition of its "Dating Advice From..." column, and this time they went to the Miss High Times contestants to answer readers questions. We're not sure if the girls were actually baked when giving their answers (for our stoned advice column, it's a requirement), but it was still really pot-centric: My girlfriend always expects me to pay for our shared pot. How can I put a stop to this? Stop buying with her. Get your own stash and let her know why you did. If she were a real stoner she would have her own stash too, and this never would have happened in the first place. [Nerve]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387278&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Romancing The Rich: Not As Fun As It Looks On TV!]]> MSNBC has an article about the host of dating sites hooking up the young and hot with the old, crochety and fantastically wealthy. John Fergus, who used to be a "sugar daddy" on a website called SeekingArrangement.com, said that he was scandalized to find the site filled with women he thought were "golddiggers" and not really looking for love. John Fergus needs to get his head out of his ass, because the site advertises itself as "the premier dating website for sugar daddies, mommies and babies." Also: "sugar babies"? Ew! Anyway, today on Nerve, Lisa Carver has an essay about the perils of dating a rich dude, which is not the Louis Vuitton-outfitted panacea that the women on
the Real Housewives of Orange County make it out to be. Not surprisingly, Carver finds that her rich boyfriend expects her to do all the 50s housewifely planning things that he's too busy to deal with as the CEO or COO or whatever of a huge company.

Carver writes:

I picked up his dry cleaning, made his travel arrangements, kept things from him to safeguard his peace of mind. When he'd forget things he'd said or done, I didn't say, "Hey, you're having blackouts." I didn't even think it. I simply would recount for him what had happened, who said what to whom, so he could get the night straight in his mind. I was holding memories for him.
But then again, it might just be that this specific rich dude is kind of a dick and also maybe a nut case. He becomes convinced that he "recognized me in a porno and showed it to me. There was a series of girls in the video, and he thought I was every one of them, even the Hispanic teenager with moles. He figured I'd altered my appearance for that one with spray-on tan, dark contact lenses and prosthetics." Okaaaay. Psychos notwithstanding, dating a super high powered person of any kind seems to be a recipe for your needs not getting met, since their first priority will always be their job. Maybe the future golddiggers of America should look out for the independently wealthy playboys instead of the people who actually worked to earn their millions. Working is so nouveau riche anyway!

Strange Currencies [Nerve]
Looking for love? Pony up the cash [MSNBC]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322189&view=rss&microfeed=true