<![CDATA[Jezebel: monica goodling]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: monica goodling]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/monicagoodling http://jezebel.com/tag/monicagoodling <![CDATA[A.G. Mukasey Rights One Of Many Wrongs Done To Victim Of FGM]]> Attorney General Michael Mukasey, after getting pressure from Congress, has reversed a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals that would have sent an unnamed 28-year-old asylum-seeker back to to her home country of Mali. The woman was seeking asylum based on the fact that her tribe, the Bambara, would force her into marriage and any daughter she might have in the future would be subjected to female genital mutilation. (In January, the Board ruled that since the asylum-seeker had been mutilated herself, she no longer had any reason for fear persecution and had to go home. Yeah, no, really... they said that. Land of the free and home of the brave, people!)

Mukasey's order sends the case back to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which, one hopes, will not act like complete assholes the second time around. Mukasey pointed out that female genital mutilation can, indeed, be inflicted more than once — making the ruling factually wrong — and that further persecution need not take the same form as the initial persecution to qualify the woman for asylum. So, the Bush Administration finally did something right... only, actually, it's all their fault in the first place.

Because, lest you forget, the immigration court judges are some of the many people Alberto Gonzales's minions — Monica Goodling and Kyle Sampsonhelped get onto the bench based on a thorough vetting of their loyalty to George W. Bush and a not so thorough vetting of their immigration law background. In fact, many of them had no immigration law qualifications whatsoever when they began to serve as immigration judges. Some had previously attempted to get non-immigration judgeships and failed, due to a lack of qualifications in the field of law they'd actually practiced, but Gonzales, Goodling and Sampson ran the immigration court appointment process with little attention to pesky details like that. In fact, when they were running the immigration courts as a loyalty-reward outlet center, only 4 seats on the immigration courts were open to a competitive application process. Studies have shown that those who were hired while the Three Musketeers were at the helm (most of whom remain on the bench) are significantly more likely to reject asylum applications than judges hired under competitive application processes that actually have an immigration law background.

So, really, Mukasey wasn't doing anything more than he was hired to do — which is clean up the shit at the Justice Department that Alberto Gonzles, left behind. So, hooray for doing the right thing, eventually and under pressure from Congress! At least this asylum seeker will get to stay. The other ones the Bushies have been busy deporting, well, good luck to them.

AG: Don't Deport Genital Mutilation Victim [CNN]
Genital Mutilation Victim Gets A New Chance At Asylum In U.S. [LA Times]
Immigration Judges Lack Apt Backgrounds [LA Times]
Immigration Judges Often Picked Based On GOP Ties [Washington Post]
Vetted Judges More Likely to Reject Asylum Bids [NY Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053687&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Raised Eyebrows Edition (Also, John McCain Is Really Old)]]>

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030231&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Men's Magazine Takes Down Bigshot Military Commander. Think It Could Happen For Vogue?]]> Hey guys! I know it doesn't involve $80,000 WHORES or anything, but someone actually more important than Eliot Spitzer resigned this week, and it was all on account of Esquire, the Hearst men's magazine. The official in question was William "Fox" Fallon, David Petreaus's boss, a guy who was neither whoremonger nor warmonger and therefore had to leave the Bush Administration. I hadn't read the story when it appeared — fuck, it's not even touted on the cover- but I sorta-read it this morning. And it is not, mind you, a work of literary greatness. There are the usual cloying Esquire-isms — "THE FIRST THING you notice is the face," one section begins; the Gaza Strip "continues to hum like a bowstring"; a whole column concerns the term "chickenshit" — but it is clear that Fallon chose Esquire as the venue in which he would respectfully pay the administration his final middle finger. He opposed the troop surge and going hawkshit on Iran, is generally portrayed as the consummate diplomat under a regime in which diplomacy is a trait disdained in diplomats, much less Naval commanders. The story is your classic "hero journalism" profile we've all come to expect from Esquire, a type sought out in the past by frustrated (emasculated?) Bush Administration dissenters Paul O'Neill and John DiIulio. It is worth reading.

So is it too predictable to point out here that no women's magazine would ever or probably will ever be a disillusioned military commander's chosen outlet for airing grievances with his or her superiors in the hegemony? Is it too broken record-y of me to point out one more time that women's magazines are such a fucking joke the most powerful woman in America stood up an interviewer hailing from the most famous one of them? That they are such a fucking joke she worried her fluffy, pointless coverage by one — in a year her fiercest opponent got his most impressive poll bounce from Oprah — would be damaging to her campaign? That it would make her look foolish and yet elitist? I wanted this post to be a lighthearted recommendation of some powerful women Glamour and Cosmo should start lobbying to resign. How awesome would it be if Cosmo finally snagged Condi? If Self got Monica Goodling? Ha ha ha, yeah, it would be awesome only to us, because those magazines are crap. Even ELLE, which is a pretty decent magazine, is so far from claiming this sort of influence it is PITIFUL. And what's the problem? Women's magazines simply make too much money. Esquire is allowed to break even. JANE was folded for not growing its profits briskly enough. Anyway, I am grumpy. Can you tell I just took my meds? I'm totally going to cheer myself up now by writing a fake Monica Goodling profile for Cosmo.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366925&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Monica Goodling is getting married! Who's...]]> Monica Goodling is getting married! Who's Monica Goodling again? Oh, just that Justice Department official whose combination of blind obedience/unquestioning deference/utter disregard for democracy and the public good made her the dumb blond paragon of the some of the most atrocious failings of the Bush Administration. Congrats, hon! [AboveTheLaw]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360956&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who's To Blame For Little-Girl Voices?]]> They say women pick clothes to impress women, but do they pick voices to impress men? That's the question we were left with after listening to reporter Ashley Milne-Tyte's segment on NPR's 'Marketplace' about the disturbing — and apparently growing — trend of adult women who sound like little girls. Like Monica Goodling, the 33-year-old, right-wing Justice Department official with a suspicious law degree, bad ethics and the voice of a twelve-year-old. Seems that we weren't the only ones cringing during Goodling's Legally Blonde-like testimony before Congress last month: In fact, Milne-Tyte started off her Marketplace segment with an audio snippet of Goodling's remarks before the mostly-male House Justice Committee, then spoke to business and communication experts about this sort of vocal dumbing-down among female professionals. The theory behind it is that some women are either so scared of their own professional shadows or so afraid of being labeled feminists that they "overcorrect" by speaking and/or acting like young girls. Take Emily Longrio, a female professional who says she took voice training at the request of her boss. And what did Longrio learn? The power of "um"!

Making declarative statements is kind of intimidating. It's a lot easier to say "Um, I'd like to talk about our annual report today," than "I'd like to talk about our annual report today.

Apparently an "um" really changes things! But, seriously: If, as Naomi Wolf intimated in the Washington Post yesterday, the childlike behavior exhibited by certain women is some deep-seated attempt to reassure the world of their vulnerability and femininity, who exactly is pushing them to do so? Other women? Or the same type of men who criticize someone like Hillary Clinton for being nakedly ambitious and "shrill"? We're curious here, people. Weigh in, in the comments.

Professional Women? With Little-Girl Voices? [Marketplace]
Related: The Image Of Helplessness [WashingtonPost]
Little Girl Voices On Grown Women [WSJ]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=269879&view=rss&microfeed=true