Look someone in the eye,
you'll see their eyes are just like yours.
Hold their hand,
it will feel like yours.
Listen to their heart, it beats like yours.
...
I wish people could talk about their problems, their pains, their depressions without the judgement of those listening. It defeats the point of listening...
We all get sad, lonely, depressed. The rich, the poor, the healthy, the sick, the beautiful, the not-so-much. Is is too much to have a touch of empathy? (Anyone see Funny Face? Anyone?)
- this might also be an extension of my mother's comment after I told her about Dahl Kim's death... "Was she too rich and beautiful?"
I have a friend whose father is worth over $10 million dollars. My friend vacations in the Caymans regularly, and takes lots of trips overseas. But every time I start to get a little jealous, I remember that his mother has left her house one time in the past decade, that he is on constant suicide watch for her, that he has dealt with serious depression himself, that his sister was in a seriously abusive relationship, and that his brother's stepchildren were sexually abused. Money doesn't solve all your problems, and sometimes those with money have bigger issues than you can imagine.
Note: I live in DC, work for a non-profit, and do "charity work". If anyone would like to turn me into an heiress or leave me a large sum of money, I promise I will feel incredibly guilty about it. Try me!
@femme-bot: People who go on and on about "class envy" are usually not poor. It's like people who bring up the words "race war" (who are usually almost always white). There's nothing wrong about resentment. Maybe we need to look at why people are resentful. There's always a reason. Are we not allowed to criticize the rich/powerful? You're neglecting to realize the great imbalances there are between the rich and the poor. The rich aren't going to get harmed if we criticize them.
@Evie Havok: Oh, don't get me wrong, people can criticize the rich, I just think it funny when it's done on Jezebel. It's funny when middle class college educated women complain about other people's privilege. Especially when they include "first world problems" before they rant about their college loans.
It's especially funny that some commenters are getting annoyed that these guys are taking jobs. If this post was about rich kids who do nothing, I bet people would be bitching that they should get jobs.
Is anyone posting here really "poor" especially when compared with the rest of the world? Everyone here has it better than someone, globally, they have it better than most. Really read some of the comments, they're (unintentionally?) hilarious.
@femme-bot: Heh. Well, those types of comments aren't coming from me as I happen to be one of those people taking up internships because I can afford to. While I see their point I'm not about to rail against myself. It's just that "class envy" is such an icky phrase used to derail criticisms about the rich/powerful. I don't know, I think just plain old resentment would do because that's what it is. Resentment=/= envy. Plus, these kidults in the article don't really sound all that great either. They're attention seeking and are trying really hard to get recognition for living like regular old middle-class people.
@Evie Havok: It's hard for me not to think the resentment is envy when people are saying things like (to paraphrase) "if they have so much trouble with this kind of guilt, they can give the money to me". Most of the comments here (on just about every "eat the rich" article) point to envy. There are a couple decent criticisms, and that's about it. The rest are just from people who are annoyed that they don't have the same privileges, and for some reason, they refuse to look at the privilege they have on a global scale.
Wait... so you mean you don't think you're the WORST for taking an internship!? Heh. I mean, what's the solution there? Do people think that if "rich kids" stop taking unpaid internships, suddenly they'd be able to afford to?
@femme-bot: Oh, I've seen those threads and participated in them, as well. I think it's a little bit different when some of these people are actually worthy of mocking and people can't help to think "why do assholes like these have so much money?" That I understand. To me it's just resentment. It's kind of like the resentment I feel toward people with white privilege. Some of the criticisms will be mangled by the resentment felt towards that kind of privilege but it's undeniably resentment not envy. I don't think everyone wants to be supremely wealthy. But they do want to live comfortably well. People just have a really adverse effect against those they see as undeserving of what they have especially if they whine and moan about their good fortune(for example, some of these rich people who let themselves be written about in articles who really aren't making themselves look good).Also, hell no, I don't feel bad about taking internships. If they were in my shoes they'd do the same. I just don't get feeling guilty for being, in my case, upper middle class (which isn't rich at all). Some of these rich people need to get over themselves and stop mentioning/referring to their social class. Really, in real life, it's done wonders for me.
@femme-bot: I get what you're saying. But on a personal note, I grew up very poor and my parents are still pretty fragile, financially. My father used to tell me "well, others have it worse than you, so you have no reason to be upset." That didn't help me then and it inflames me now when I hear people say something similar. It almost feel patronizing. Just because I wasn't as poor as 3rd world children didn't make my plight any easier to handle.
@WashingMyHair: Well it doesn't make it easier, of course. But think of it like this, the way many commenters feel about these "rich kids" is how many people in developing nations feel about the poor and middle class people in the US.
Other people having it worse than you doesn't mean you can't be upset (trust, nothing annoys me more than the middle class morons telling me I have "first world problems"), but I guess my privilege is showing because I can't comprehend people being upset with their socioeconomic class. It is what it is, and most likely, it's not changing. The problem isn't gaps in "class", the problems lie in lack in opportunity. We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot.
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: Some internships are paid. I worked an (unpaid) part time internship while I had a part time job. It sucks but it doesn't kill you.
You can say the same thing about college that you're saying about internships...
@femme-bot: Unpaid work is just the exploitation of educated young people -- some whose parents foot the bills and some who work 2nd and 3rd jobs to be able to subsidize their employers. It's wrong for work to be free when the institutions are large and profitable.
@femme-bot: "We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot." And why useless spending on useless wars needs to be stopped. I think about a month in Iraq could pay for healthcare for the whole country for a year
It's nice that these richies have a social conscience and try to do some good in the world. If we didn't have rich people who absorbed the idea that wealth comes with the responsibility to give something back to society, then we'd all be worse off.
But at the same time, I read stories like this and think, "First World problems, people! These are First World problems! Not having safe drinking water, dodging bullets, slow starvation...those are actual problems. Some perspective, please!"
And then I feel bad for disliking people with money, because after all, they ARE trying. Agh, I hate it when I can't just hate people for simple-minded reasons.
"I definitely feel like I am at war between my desires instilled in me to eat out at nice restaurants and my better sense and principles"
Go out to restaurants as often as possible rich kid. It helps the money go around and stimulates the economy. If it makes you feel better you can leave an extra large tip to that crabby waitress who was probably up all night with her newborn and working on her masters thesis.
We live in this era where we all present ourselves as a product. It's the difference between somebody saying "I am" and "I am the kind of person who".
If you want to work for a non-profit, that's amazing. Own it. Say, "I am working for a non-profit". Say, "I am rich because of my family". Say, "I am guilty sometimes for having money".
I know too many people - rich and not - who are laboring under the misapprehension that people care about the mysterious underpinnings of their psyche or are interested in the mundane details of their likes and dislikes. These people package themselves with grand pronouncements: "I am the kind of person who refuses to take money from my parents", or "I am the kind of person who believes eating in restaurants is bourgeois", or "I am the kind of person who only drinks fair trade black coffee/ shops at goodwill/ makes great art/ feels incredibly empty".
Nobody gives a shit what kind of rich person you are. Just be a human. You are not inherently more interesting or complicated than anyone else. Get some life experience and learn that self-awareness, self-deprecation, and empathy is not equivalent to fetishizing the "poor" or living like common people do or indulging in righteous self-loathing or telling me what a special snowflake you are.
Or, in the words of my husband, "Blah fucking blah, you privileged twat. Nobody fucking cares."
@funzette: I liked your post! I love that you sorted the difference between those who say "I am" and those who say "I am the type who..." People should quit thinking so hard about the type of person they want to come across as (because, let's face it, we are all too aware and care too much about what others say of us) and just BE that person.
The last part of your comment reminded me of a Jon Stewart line. He was referring to people who lie, cheat and steal but I think it has relevance here: "Be a f*cking human!"
@willwriteforfood: People who say "I am the type of the person who" are usually the exact opposite of that type of person. I think I stole that from a line in Chelsea Handler's last book. Actually, I'm sure I did. Regardless, I second this second hand sentiment.
And then there's this: "In Vermont [this year], I broke my finger and didn't have insurance," said Treibitz, whose father is chief executive of a Colorado company that designs visual presentations for court trials. "I got my X-ray and gave [the hospital] a fake name and walked out. Is that okay that I am doing that -- taking up resources because I am refusing to take money from my parents?"
No, it's not okay, you twit. It's not okay for non-rich people to do it; it's certainly not okay for you to do it. Suck it up and ask for help. Non-rich people do not want company. We want you to consider that to the rest of us, our nonprofit jobs aren't just philanthropic icing on a secure future; they are our jobs, which pay for our homes and families, and when you steal from nonprofits, you steal from all of us who need to work there. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.
Separate issue: I wish just one of these people had talked about using their power and/or their wealth to create or save jobs in this country. While they're playing at work, people are losing their homes and running out of unemployment insurance. Yes, charities need help. But more people need livelihoods than people who need the services of charities. And a lot of people who are now rich got that way by outsourcing jobs that Americans needed to live on. If they want to feel guilty, they can start right there.
@clevernamehere: I was really surprised the editors didn't mention it in the post. That's not just obnoxious; that's criminal behavior. The idea that anyone would think they could justify doing it for some principle of self-reliance, when they do in fact have access to the resources to pay for the services, is incredible.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: You know, or he could do what the rest of us without health insurance do: set up a payment plan with the hospital (smart) or put in on a credit card (not so smart).
@frenchic: I know, either way would at least have been honest! Is that what wealth teaches you--that if you are poor, you've a right to be dishonest? Because if there's one thing I've learned from poverty, it's that few things are despised more than thievery when there isn't enough to go around.
I'm going to go ahead and admit that I feel the resentment.
My husband is from an upper middle class family and my family is very poor. He has worked really hard to become successful in his career, but I can't help but resent the opportunities that he has been given his whole life. What really gets to me is that he doesn't see how much of an advantage someone from his background has. He doesn't see that's it not based solely on hard work.
I realize now that we're married it's "our" success. But it still sucks to be the one in the relationship with the crappy job who had to choose between not finishing college or being homeless at the time.
@Tippi Hedren: I married someone from a much better background myself--they have industrial wealth. My husband's not so bad; he's seen me with my student loans and our struggle to get by with his underpaying job, and he gets it. It's his mother who's a real trial to me. They're unfailingly generous to us, but don't understand how we can feel that they use their money to control us, to keep us from making our own decisions about some fairly big things. And MIL, who has never worked to support herself, never paid for college, never wanted for anything, has the nerve to tell me she understands poverty because they live within their considerable means. One of these days, it's going to burst out of my mouth that when your car dies and you can buy another new one for cash without blinking, you know nothing whatsoever of poverty.
@Tippi Hedren: I had the same college experience, and it still bothers me how few people can understand the implications of working during college for food and shelter, compared to working for pizza money.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: Sounds like my BF's family. Mine is far from wealthy (directions to my parents house involve the words "pass the big trailer park, and then take a left at the little trailer park"), and his is pretty well off. He, however, rebelled and basically turned his back on them and went out on his own. His siblings, though, are another story. And they'll tell you that all is fine and well until they get drunk and start to talk about how it sucks, they don't want to have to be going for an MBA, that they'd rather move to the mountains and be a snowboarding, pot smoking, hippie. It's hard to not be resentful of their fancy new cars and shiny degrees, but then I think of those conversations and it helps. (Not that I want to move to the mountains and be a snowboarding, pot smoking hippie, but I don't have to worry about getting cut off from the family funds if I do.)
@Dizzy8: Yes, excellent example. He complains about having had to eat mac and cheese. Umm... if you actually got to eat, I wouldn't be complaining too hard.
@Tippi Hedren: I totally feel you on this. I made a career transition last year and started working at a nonprofit, and while the work is great and I enjoy it, I don't know how much longer I can last in this field, mainly because of the insensitivities of a lot of my co-workers. In New York in particular, which is an insanely expensive city, being able to live on a nonprofit/media salary is an immense privilege that very few can afford, and they simply don't recognize that. I know that with my enormous undergraduate loans it's exceedingly difficult, but I've sacrificed certain things because it's a choice. My coworkers are my age group and all moved here and similarly went to 'good' colleges and spend their time kvetching about 'sell-outs' and 'bankers' and how much they hate people who take on 'boring' jobs after college that don't contribute to social good the way they do and are generally really sanctimonious. As a scholarship student who lives at home to save money, I resent this. I resent the fact that they can all blissfully work on a $30k salary and have apartments in areas where I know rent is well over a grand a month. Many of my friends from college and high school are the very 'sellouts' they like to make fun of for working in more profitable fields - because it's one of the few things that college grads can do that can afford you independence in an expensive city.
@Tippi Hedren: My husband comes from a wealthy background too and, while I don't resent his opportunities, I resent how blind his parents and brother are to how their family wealth has protected them. All except my husband are convinced that their financial security is all due to their hard work. But inheriting a family business in middle age after spending years dicking around selling Amway and whatever is NOT hard work. My in-laws were very lucky.
My brother-in-law wasted his twenties, then woke up, his parents bailed him out, and now he's doing well. He doesn't think people living in poverty should get any kind of government help because he thinks they were all like he was-- just irresponsible people who should have worked harder. He totally misses that he didn't work his way to where he is now-- he got BAILED OUT and then found a decent job because his parents paid his way through school. Someone without a wealthy family like his would have been screwed for life. They would never have had the luxury to waste their 20's partying in the first place.
I am extremely aware of the privilege my little family has now. It is a huge relief to know that I'll never have to worry about being out on the street. So even though we're trying to do things on our own right now-- my husband and I are both college students plus he works and we have two little kids-- we know we're way better off than most people in our current income bracket. We don't live with the fear that one major disaster would ruin us. I grew up with that hanging over my head-- with a dad who had health problems which meant my parents were never able to get ahead-- that fear that one more job loss, one more lengthy hospitalization, and we may lose everything. If you haven't been there you can never understand what an immense privilege it is to know you have a place to fall. I do resent people who don't understand that.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: Your comment that your parents-in-law somehow use their generosity to control you resonated with me very much. My family is by no means uber-rich, but my grandparents saved every dime they had to ensure that they wouldn't be a burden to anyone in their old age, then didn't live as long as we expected (forever), both of my parents inherited a couple hundred grand each and my dad subsequently invested that and savings from their modest incomes very well. Because of 2 generations of impressive money management skills, all my college expenses were covered...and when I spent all my money, they gave me more. When I accumulated a huge amount of credit card debt, they bailed me out. Rinse, repeat. I never suffered any consequences from my mistakes and so continued to make them. As I got older, I realized that they did this out of a combination of generosity, guilt (childhood sucked, so whatever we can do to make up for that we will) but it also served as a means to keep me close, my continued financial dependence prevented me from growing away and into an adult accountable for my poor choices.
That being said, it isn't that I didn't KNOW how to manage money; I had seen it modeled for me all my life. I was just never required to do it myself, and so when I was out on my own, Grandpa's "never spend money you don't have" mantra seemed to slip my mind.
Additionally, my grandpa and dad were/are notoriously frugal--my dad will exercise the right to a senior citizen discount on a 89 cent soda at McDonald's-- and because this behavior embarrassed me immensely, not to mention having an overall desire to be nothing like my father, I really threw the baby out with the bathwater, failing to discern between behaviors I should model (money management) and those I shouldn't (pretty much everything else).
I am in no way in the same position that these kids are (my mom has told me "Don't even think about an inheritance. I'm spending every dime") but I do think that it is admirable-if misguided--to try to overcome the extravagant lifestyle these kids grew up with. It's hard to break life long habits and change deeply instilled ideas about the way that the world works. Good for anyone trying to overcome that.
Sorry this is so long: as Mark Twain (or TS Eliot or Proust or Ben Franklin and probably a million other people) said, "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." I haven't quite mastered that. :-)
@BearDownCBears: As a mini (and hopefully not so annoying) version of the people in the article...please do tax me, my parents, and my grandparents!
There's actually an organization called Wealth for the Common Good that I'm trying to get my grandparents to join that recruits wealthy individuals to fight for progressive tax reform and speak publicly about how they should be made to pay more. I think they have might ties to Resource Generation (which I find to be annoying and not really understand the complexities of privilege) but I also think the organization has an angle we never hear.
I have this personal theory, based solely on the series of weiners that I have dated, that so many little boys these days are raised to believe they are special little snowflakes and they should seek out alternative employment that really satisfies their longing to create and be an agent of change in their life etc, etc, etc...whereas more and more little girls are being raised with the message that you have to work really, really hard and get a job and be ready to support your family entirely on your own because the world is changing and you can't rely on the mens anymore for any kind of support and the result is more and more women are in the kind of situation detailed in the post. I mean, custom-made golf clubs, IN THIS ECONOMY??
This kind of arrangement, where the woman has the steady job and daddy stays home to craft eco-friendly you-tube videos or whatever, seems to be more and more common. Certainly, the reverse used to be a common arrangement for couples with the power-daddy and a mom that stays home and makes candles or whatnot, and I almost applaud the fact that now it seems a gender-neutral situation, but I still resent the fact that I'm sitting here relentlessly pursuing a law-degree while every man I meet is working on his writing or formulating his amazing spike jonze-esque film debut and being supported by their parents. Why are women more and more the only ones being encouraged to be responsible? Is this the result of my parents' generation where everyone got divorced and the mothers all preached aggressive self-reliance?
Its not a bad thing that being successful is no longer the badge of masculinity it once was, but I know I feel no sympathy for a man who _hopes_ to someday contribute to the family expenses with his totally fun sounding interest in custom golf clubs. Maybe I'm just bitter because it seems I'm always the one buying dinner these days. #wagegap
I was living with my current partner for the last 2 years. We're both college students, so our primary "income" is student loans. I have tried to avoid giant loans, but you know, life happens and all that.
Anyway, he got fired well over a year ago, and hasn't worked since. Part of it was pure laziness (he didn't go to find a job, since he was in school and had loans that covered the bills) and part of it was sudden recession in which it was next to impossible to find work. As long as he paid his half of the bills, I was fine. It's his money and his life, and I don't really give a shit as long as I don't have to support him.
Then the student loans didn't come. His parents had been knocked down a tax bracket, and they decided that it was the perfect time to audit. They also told him not to get a job, as it would put him in a higher need bracket and expedite the process. I was working 20 hours a week or less on overnights, and not exactly bringing in the biggest paychecks. I ended up paying the rent through November, and was on the verge of bankruptcy when the loans FINALLY came (after Thanksgiving, oddly enough). He paid me back in full the first day he got his loans.
So, technically, I'm the "breadwinner". He's never once said anything about how our genders play into it. It's always been about how it works for us - that I had to pay the bills, and yes, I resented it a lot. Not because he is "the man" and must pay the bills, but because I wasn't making enough money to support two people. I was hardly making enough to support one. I kept my job because I hardly missed a day (he had a lot of funerals and family emergencies). I am more concerned about how this will affect his future, now that he doesn't owe me money any more. His self-image is not tied to providing for me, but rather, being an equal partner, and it hurt both of us when he couldn't do that. #wagegap
When Mr. Spamanda went back to school six years ago, even our friends asked us "how it felt" for me to be the breadwinner. I couldn't believe it. He was still working, I just had the steady job and the insurance. I think of my friends as being progressive, but this is such a pervasive idea. When our first son was born and we split the childcare 50/50 (by working different days of the week) people were REALLY weirded out by it. Even among young people, gender roles are so ingrained.
Also, custom golf clubs? Wow. #wagegap
@spamanda: I often have friends tell me that Mr.Pear needs to "get a better job, and pull his weight more." I always remind them, that if our work/pay situations were reversed NO ONE would say anything about it. There is still very much a double-standard. #wagegap
@spamanda: In a way, I think it is an easy out for women, even if they are progressive. If they are tired of working hard, or generally looking for a reason to resent their husband, it can be tempting for them to think that a real man should be providing for them. I've been the breadwinner for the last three years, and I can't imagine the pressure if society expected me to shoulder that burden for my whole marriage, without exceptions or help. #wagegap
@OneBigPear: Yeah, now that I'm a stay at home mom with our two children, no one suggests I "need" to find a job. I've also never been asked "how it feels" to have Mr. Spamanda provide all the financial support (well, other than friends who are also considering staying at home with kids!) #wagegap
I totally missed that whole "Bills, Bills, Bills" stage and went straight into "Independent Women". Except I went into "Broke Independent Woman" stage, which is decidely less glamorous. Far fewer opportunities to throw one's hands up. #wagegap
What I've also found really interesting about some of the speculation about how things are changing in regards to which gender is making the money is how many people are willing to state that it might change "gender roles". To me, it's sort of startling to see people in the mainstream (or whatever you'd like to call it) out and out admitting and talking about how finances affect how we interact on a personal level. It's really only another step to start talking about how, traditionally, money has been used to force women into certain situations and roles and keep them there and then a little skip forward to see where the resistance to women being paid equally comes from. #wagegap
01:29 AM
you'll see their eyes are just like yours.
Hold their hand,
it will feel like yours.
Listen to their heart, it beats like yours.
...
I wish people could talk about their problems, their pains, their depressions without the judgement of those listening. It defeats the point of listening...
We all get sad, lonely, depressed. The rich, the poor, the healthy, the sick, the beautiful, the not-so-much. Is is too much to have a touch of empathy? (Anyone see Funny Face? Anyone?)
- this might also be an extension of my mother's comment after I told her about Dahl Kim's death... "Was she too rich and beautiful?"
11/20/09
11/20/09
03:55 AM
11:34 AM
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
It's especially funny that some commenters are getting annoyed that these guys are taking jobs. If this post was about rich kids who do nothing, I bet people would be bitching that they should get jobs.
Is anyone posting here really "poor" especially when compared with the rest of the world? Everyone here has it better than someone, globally, they have it better than most.
Really read some of the comments, they're (unintentionally?) hilarious.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Wait... so you mean you don't think you're the WORST for taking an internship!? Heh. I mean, what's the solution there? Do people think that if "rich kids" stop taking unpaid internships, suddenly they'd be able to afford to?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Other people having it worse than you doesn't mean you can't be upset (trust, nothing annoys me more than the middle class morons telling me I have "first world problems"), but I guess my privilege is showing because I can't comprehend people being upset with their socioeconomic class. It is what it is, and most likely, it's not changing. The problem isn't gaps in "class", the problems lie in lack in opportunity. We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot.
11/20/09
11/20/09
You can say the same thing about college that you're saying about internships...
01:08 AM
#tips
01:09 AM
#tips
11/20/09
But at the same time, I read stories like this and think, "First World problems, people! These are First World problems! Not having safe drinking water, dodging bullets, slow starvation...those are actual problems. Some perspective, please!"
And then I feel bad for disliking people with money, because after all, they ARE trying. Agh, I hate it when I can't just hate people for simple-minded reasons.
11/20/09
Go out to restaurants as often as possible rich kid. It helps the money go around and stimulates the economy. If it makes you feel better you can leave an extra large tip to that crabby waitress who was probably up all night with her newborn and working on her masters thesis.
11/20/09
We live in this era where we all present ourselves as a product. It's the difference between somebody saying "I am" and "I am the kind of person who".
If you want to work for a non-profit, that's amazing. Own it. Say, "I am working for a non-profit". Say, "I am rich because of my family". Say, "I am guilty sometimes for having money".
I know too many people - rich and not - who are laboring under the misapprehension that people care about the mysterious underpinnings of their psyche or are interested in the mundane details of their likes and dislikes. These people package themselves with grand pronouncements: "I am the kind of person who refuses to take money from my parents", or "I am the kind of person who believes eating in restaurants is bourgeois", or "I am the kind of person who only drinks fair trade black coffee/ shops at goodwill/ makes great art/ feels incredibly empty".
Nobody gives a shit what kind of rich person you are. Just be a human. You are not inherently more interesting or complicated than anyone else. Get some life experience and learn that self-awareness, self-deprecation, and empathy is not equivalent to fetishizing the "poor" or living like common people do or indulging in righteous self-loathing or telling me what a special snowflake you are.
Or, in the words of my husband, "Blah fucking blah, you privileged twat. Nobody fucking cares."
/FIN.
11/20/09
The last part of your comment reminded me of a Jon Stewart line. He was referring to people who lie, cheat and steal but I think it has relevance here: "Be a f*cking human!"
11/20/09
11/20/09
No, it's not okay, you twit. It's not okay for non-rich people to do it; it's certainly not okay for you to do it. Suck it up and ask for help. Non-rich people do not want company. We want you to consider that to the rest of us, our nonprofit jobs aren't just philanthropic icing on a secure future; they are our jobs, which pay for our homes and families, and when you steal from nonprofits, you steal from all of us who need to work there. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.
Separate issue: I wish just one of these people had talked about using their power and/or their wealth to create or save jobs in this country. While they're playing at work, people are losing their homes and running out of unemployment insurance. Yes, charities need help. But more people need livelihoods than people who need the services of charities. And a lot of people who are now rich got that way by outsourcing jobs that Americans needed to live on. If they want to feel guilty, they can start right there.
11/20/09
Money is a finate resource. The money that hospital spent on his xray could have been used for someone who really needed it.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
My husband is from an upper middle class family and my family is very poor. He has worked really hard to become successful in his career, but I can't help but resent the opportunities that he has been given his whole life. What really gets to me is that he doesn't see how much of an advantage someone from his background has. He doesn't see that's it not based solely on hard work.
I realize now that we're married it's "our" success. But it still sucks to be the one in the relationship with the crappy job who had to choose between not finishing college or being homeless at the time.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
My brother-in-law wasted his twenties, then woke up, his parents bailed him out, and now he's doing well. He doesn't think people living in poverty should get any kind of government help because he thinks they were all like he was-- just irresponsible people who should have worked harder. He totally misses that he didn't work his way to where he is now-- he got BAILED OUT and then found a decent job because his parents paid his way through school. Someone without a wealthy family like his would have been screwed for life. They would never have had the luxury to waste their 20's partying in the first place.
I am extremely aware of the privilege my little family has now. It is a huge relief to know that I'll never have to worry about being out on the street. So even though we're trying to do things on our own right now-- my husband and I are both college students plus he works and we have two little kids-- we know we're way better off than most people in our current income bracket. We don't live with the fear that one major disaster would ruin us. I grew up with that hanging over my head-- with a dad who had health problems which meant my parents were never able to get ahead-- that fear that one more job loss, one more lengthy hospitalization, and we may lose everything. If you haven't been there you can never understand what an immense privilege it is to know you have a place to fall. I do resent people who don't understand that.
11/20/09
That being said, it isn't that I didn't KNOW how to manage money; I had seen it modeled for me all my life. I was just never required to do it myself, and so when I was out on my own, Grandpa's "never spend money you don't have" mantra seemed to slip my mind.
Additionally, my grandpa and dad were/are notoriously frugal--my dad will exercise the right to a senior citizen discount on a 89 cent soda at McDonald's-- and because this behavior embarrassed me immensely, not to mention having an overall desire to be nothing like my father, I really threw the baby out with the bathwater, failing to discern between behaviors I should model (money management) and those I shouldn't (pretty much everything else).
I am in no way in the same position that these kids are (my mom has told me "Don't even think about an inheritance. I'm spending every dime") but I do think that it is admirable-if misguided--to try to overcome the extravagant lifestyle these kids grew up with. It's hard to break life long habits and change deeply instilled ideas about the way that the world works. Good for anyone trying to overcome that.
Sorry this is so long: as Mark Twain (or TS Eliot or Proust or Ben Franklin and probably a million other people) said, "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." I haven't quite mastered that. :-)
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
There's actually an organization called Wealth for the Common Good that I'm trying to get my grandparents to join that recruits wealthy individuals to fight for progressive tax reform and speak publicly about how they should be made to pay more. I think they have might ties to Resource Generation (which I find to be annoying and not really understand the complexities of privilege) but I also think the organization has an angle we never hear.
11/20/09
And if all private property is nationalized, what about the LIVERY OF SIESIN?
#tips
10/19/09
This kind of arrangement, where the woman has the steady job and daddy stays home to craft eco-friendly you-tube videos or whatever, seems to be more and more common. Certainly, the reverse used to be a common arrangement for couples with the power-daddy and a mom that stays home and makes candles or whatnot, and I almost applaud the fact that now it seems a gender-neutral situation, but I still resent the fact that I'm sitting here relentlessly pursuing a law-degree while every man I meet is working on his writing or formulating his amazing spike jonze-esque film debut and being supported by their parents. Why are women more and more the only ones being encouraged to be responsible? Is this the result of my parents' generation where everyone got divorced and the mothers all preached aggressive self-reliance?
Its not a bad thing that being successful is no longer the badge of masculinity it once was, but I know I feel no sympathy for a man who _hopes_ to someday contribute to the family expenses with his totally fun sounding interest in custom golf clubs. Maybe I'm just bitter because it seems I'm always the one buying dinner these days. #wagegap
10/19/09
Anyway, he got fired well over a year ago, and hasn't worked since. Part of it was pure laziness (he didn't go to find a job, since he was in school and had loans that covered the bills) and part of it was sudden recession in which it was next to impossible to find work. As long as he paid his half of the bills, I was fine. It's his money and his life, and I don't really give a shit as long as I don't have to support him.
Then the student loans didn't come. His parents had been knocked down a tax bracket, and they decided that it was the perfect time to audit. They also told him not to get a job, as it would put him in a higher need bracket and expedite the process. I was working 20 hours a week or less on overnights, and not exactly bringing in the biggest paychecks. I ended up paying the rent through November, and was on the verge of bankruptcy when the loans FINALLY came (after Thanksgiving, oddly enough). He paid me back in full the first day he got his loans.
So, technically, I'm the "breadwinner". He's never once said anything about how our genders play into it. It's always been about how it works for us - that I had to pay the bills, and yes, I resented it a lot. Not because he is "the man" and must pay the bills, but because I wasn't making enough money to support two people. I was hardly making enough to support one. I kept my job because I hardly missed a day (he had a lot of funerals and family emergencies). I am more concerned about how this will affect his future, now that he doesn't owe me money any more. His self-image is not tied to providing for me, but rather, being an equal partner, and it hurt both of us when he couldn't do that. #wagegap
10/19/09
Also, custom golf clubs? Wow. #wagegap
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09