I'm a "mommy blogger" in that I am a mom and I have a blog, but it is used only to keep all of our out of town family (which is ALL our family) in the loop about what is going on with us, and what Baby Buster is up to each day. I would LOVE to get political, but nobody outside my family and close friends (and apparently, a few of my sister in law's friends) reads it, and my whole family is conservative. So I think it would lead to some shouting.
But maybe I should think of it as Blog of Dreams... if I write it, they will come and read it?
Wait, if they are political bloggers who happen to be mothers, are they considered a "mommy blogger"? It sounds like some of the women featured would be, which is bothersome. Would we call a guy who blogs who happens to be a father a "Daddy blogger"? No-- the term doesn't even exist.
Obviously the ones listed such as PunditMom and MomsRising self-identify as "mommy bloggers", but unless they are posting a majority of their time on mom-related issues, even that bothers me a bit. Like their mommy-hood is the only way they perceive themselves (versus as a feminist, or liberal, or environmentalist as it applies).
I look forward to having children, so I want to clarify that I'm not coming from a child-free perspective or anything, but it bothers me a bit when the fact that someone is a mother subsumes all other parts of their identity (whether by themselves or society).
@formergr: Agreed! And coming from a child-free perspective, too!
The blog is a "mommy blog" when its primary focus is "mommy issues". It can be many things at once. Not every mother who blogs chooses to do so about her children. While there definitely might be some relation to her motherhood, it's not the end-all, be-all of her existence.
Not that this shouldn't be obvious (although maybe it isn't), "mommy" is now as often as not entirely independent of a "daddy" or partner. That said, she is the head of household, its political/social views and agenda. So why the fuck not? Speak up, fellow mom's!
I wholeheartedly support this type of endeavour. One of my reasons for being scared to have kids is that it would automatically make me "mom" instead of all the things I am now. That sense of loss is powerful, and I agree that motherhood gets a bad reputation for being all-consuming and creating mommy-drones. I think this kind of example could change the way society views motherhood, and maybe how some mothers view themselves: it shouldn't just be the martyr vs. the "bad mom". It should be seen as so and so who is (insert qualities and accomplishments here) has kids.
I really love MomsRising. I get newsltters from them all the time and I feel like they do a great job of picking the issues that directly relate to most moms. They make it really easy to get involved. I gave them a small amount of money this year and I never give money to political groups so it was a big deal to me.
For a glorious moment I thought it said "Blogger Lisa Frank organized a group of political moms called Activistas to campaign for paid maternity leave in Oregon."
Because I can only imagine the amount of neon unicorns, tigers, puppies and stars that would be employed in that campaign.
sympathyforthebasementcat promoted this comment
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was starred
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was unstarred
Back in ancient times (6 years ago), before the rush of "mommy blogs," I had my first child and was freaked out by the competitive nature of moms. Those in my parenting group had to have the newest nursing supplies, the right parenting styles, and the funkiest strollers. This competitiveness seems to revolve around books and items that have been marketed as the hippest thing for your child.
It only makes sense that this attitude would leak into whatever blogs these moms are writing. Of course moms label themselves and their kids. But that's all it is . . . a label to draw attention. I've seen a bunch of "alternative" or hipster parenting groups. And let me tell you, they are just as cliquish, competitive, and judgmental as the suburban set.
A mommy blog has nothing really to do with being a mom, it has to do with making money. So, it's really not so surprising that just like most everything else on the internet it has become a "commercial act."
@dancemomma: Come onna my house! We'll talk about how my kids weren't potty trained until they were 4 and 3 1/2, respectively, and I'll show you the crusty, old stroller. And then I'll take you over to hang with my friends, almost all of whom I met through a parent-child center, and they'll give you some wine and talk about how stupid competitive parents are. And I'll give you cookies! (I warn you: We are technically in the suburbs. But it's a nice one).
@dancemomma: Completely true. It's like everything else in life, people put on a label and try to be the best at it. The most Christian family, the most alternative, the most vegan or granola. People always want to have someone to look down on.
You don't have the best stroller? Failure.
Don't breastfeed your kid until age 3? Failure
Allow your kids to have sugar? Failure
@ellaesther:
Thank you so much. I was beginning to think I was the only one that didn't get my kids potty trained until they were almost four. The only thing that worked was to tell them they couldn't use the computer until they were potty trained, because only big boys were allowed to use the computer.
A) Thank you, Anna N. for this sentence in particular: "Motherhood can be lonely and scary, and it's no wonder that moms crave voices they can trust" -- because it's just the truth, and I think that a great many people still don't realize it or want to admit it. I mean, motherhood can also be joyful and beautiful and funny and intellectually challenging (really!), but it can also be lonely and scary -- and sometimes while also joyful, etc -- and it's just very important to acknowledge that.
B) I think the word "blog" has gotten too big for the conversations we have about "blogging." Some women are recording the daily exploits of their children, others are trying to be service-y, others are examining social issues through the lens of parenting. These are all very, very different things. I think that as consumers and as readers, we're at a stage in the development of this form that we would be wise to start considering different blogs in differing lights -- otherwise, it's a bit like using the word "book" to mean a magazine full of advertising, someone's personal diary, and a collection of essays. They are so different. We need to learn to approach them differently.
I have already begun to harp on to my kids about how to read the internet, and this is why, when I, a mommy, do my blogging, I source things as best as I can. (But then, I'm not getting paid anything by anyone, so maybe I'm not the best example...!)
Does anyone want to sponsor a blog about a childless woman who knits socks? No? I would totally sell out if anyone wanted to pay me to write about the minutiae of my life.
@Flackette Goes Retro: You knit socks? Really? That's kind of very awesome! (And no, sorry. I can't sponsor your blog. I can barely sponsor my own. I can't even offer a barter system, whereby you pay me in socks and I pay you in something else, because I don't know how to produce anything useful. Come the revolution, my family and I will all starve, but at least I'll be able to record it nicely for posterity...).
@Flackette Goes Retro: There are a TON of knitting bloggers who get sent yarn, books, and other goodies to review on their blogs. I have seen more than one knitters blog start of tiny and spin into a book deal.
@penny Don't feel bad, I'm a Mom and a blogger and I don't read them either. My blog is about cancer and I suspect my kids will appreciate not being discussed on the web for everyone's amusement.
@aftercancer: exactly. That's one thing I don't get why would you put your children all over the internet like that. And don't start me on journalists doing in newspapers, it's a big bugbear of mine.
This is essentially how womens magazines work. Companies send the editors a crapload of free products, and then the writers "review" those products. So, it's nothing new in terms of a marketing strategy.
That said, I frequently turn to blogs because I feel like the voice is more personal and authentic than a highly-edited and designed magazine. Perhaps this will not continue to be the case.
@mipsy6: This is essentially how every publication ever works -- everything from cosmetics reviews in Cosmo to book reviews in Entertainment Weekly to record reviews in your college paper are the result of somebody sending something to a journalist for free. It does nothing to change the voice of the writer or the publication. Mommy bloggers are just discovering what other freelance have known for years -- if you write, you can get free shit.
@egg cream is here, is second tier, get used to it: It does change the voice a litte, at least in my experience as a former magazine editor at a publication aimed at teen girls. The writers definitely reviewed--and therefore promoted--products they got for free more frequently than products they had to seek out on their own. And I don't think that "every publication ever" works this way. Many newspapers--and I assume some magazines--have rules about what their reporters can and cannot accept from the companies they cover in an attempt to ensure journalistic objectivity.
@mipsy6: That is why I figured out that Makeupalley.com is a better way to find the best unbiased reviews of products. Magazine reviews cant be trusted because if they're raving a new Revlon lipstick chances are there's a full page ad for the same product less than two pages over.
the "bad mommy" is now a cultural trope, but the fact that moms apply this label to themselves when they let their kids cry in a store or eat hot dogs for dinner is evidence that the archetype of the perfect mother still has power, and that women still notice, every day, that they don't live up to it.
THIS is my beef with the "bad mommy" trope. It's self-applied for the most benign reasons. It's attention-whoring.
@SarahMC: I'm doing this!: I agree. I feel like this trope mainly describes a person who is constantly feeling the pea of societal disapproval under a hundred mattresses of well-being and material privilege.
08/15/09
08/14/09
But maybe I should think of it as Blog of Dreams... if I write it, they will come and read it?
08/14/09
Obviously the ones listed such as PunditMom and MomsRising self-identify as "mommy bloggers", but unless they are posting a majority of their time on mom-related issues, even that bothers me a bit. Like their mommy-hood is the only way they perceive themselves (versus as a feminist, or liberal, or environmentalist as it applies).
I look forward to having children, so I want to clarify that I'm not coming from a child-free perspective or anything, but it bothers me a bit when the fact that someone is a mother subsumes all other parts of their identity (whether by themselves or society).
08/15/09
The blog is a "mommy blog" when its primary focus is "mommy issues". It can be many things at once. Not every mother who blogs chooses to do so about her children. While there definitely might be some relation to her motherhood, it's not the end-all, be-all of her existence.
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
Because I can only imagine the amount of neon unicorns, tigers, puppies and stars that would be employed in that campaign.
07/16/09
It only makes sense that this attitude would leak into whatever blogs these moms are writing. Of course moms label themselves and their kids. But that's all it is . . . a label to draw attention. I've seen a bunch of "alternative" or hipster parenting groups. And let me tell you, they are just as cliquish, competitive, and judgmental as the suburban set.
A mommy blog has nothing really to do with being a mom, it has to do with making money. So, it's really not so surprising that just like most everything else on the internet it has become a "commercial act."
07/16/09
07/16/09
You don't have the best stroller? Failure.
Don't breastfeed your kid until age 3? Failure
Allow your kids to have sugar? Failure
And so. It's insane.
07/16/09
Thank you so much. I was beginning to think I was the only one that didn't get my kids potty trained until they were almost four. The only thing that worked was to tell them they couldn't use the computer until they were potty trained, because only big boys were allowed to use the computer.
07/16/09
B) I think the word "blog" has gotten too big for the conversations we have about "blogging." Some women are recording the daily exploits of their children, others are trying to be service-y, others are examining social issues through the lens of parenting. These are all very, very different things. I think that as consumers and as readers, we're at a stage in the development of this form that we would be wise to start considering different blogs in differing lights -- otherwise, it's a bit like using the word "book" to mean a magazine full of advertising, someone's personal diary, and a collection of essays. They are so different. We need to learn to approach them differently.
I have already begun to harp on to my kids about how to read the internet, and this is why, when I, a mommy, do my blogging, I source things as best as I can. (But then, I'm not getting paid anything by anyone, so maybe I'm not the best example...!)
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
That said, I frequently turn to blogs because I feel like the voice is more personal and authentic than a highly-edited and designed magazine. Perhaps this will not continue to be the case.
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
THIS is my beef with the "bad mommy" trope. It's self-applied for the most benign reasons. It's attention-whoring.
07/16/09