I worked 7 years at a downtown library that saw everyone from every possible walk of life. THEN I then worked 7 years at a library serving the most stereotypical white privileged suburb you could find, a stint which nearly turned me into a Marxist.
Guess which library had by far the worst-behaved kids and parents?
Ah, how I miss them all -- the ones who were always bitching about 10-cent fines and "the principle of the thing" when their jewels returned 1/3rd of a 3-piece audio-visual item they'd checked out (doesn't that count as having returned it?) and the ones who actually did all their childrens' homework because the snowflakes were too busy with important things like soccer. The ones in such a hurry they would complain loudly about the speed bumps that were put in after one of them ran down a kid in the parking lot.
I don't hate mommies, parents, or kids, but this lot will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes if I have my way.
look, she can call childless people entitled and hateful and imposing all day, but I'll be more sympathetic when I hear of a childless couple, dressed to the nines, walking into a Chuck E Cheez and demanding everyone be quiet so they can enjoy a romantic evening together.
It's a question of appropriate settings and appropriate behavior (from adults and kids!). I recognize that the majority of parents are doing the best they can on the latter, but many are falling off on the former. Some places are not appropriate for kids to be, both from their perspective (they're probably bored to tears at your hip, happening bar, sorry hipster douchebag parents) or from that of the other patrons.
The worst are the ones who get both wrong - badly behaved children in a place kids shouldn't even be (I live in Utah, and nearly every PG13 and R rated movie experience has involved children running feral in the theater), and they aren't a majority, but they sure are a significant minority, and they sure are irritating.
Here's how I see it---and I've thought about it a lot. Before birth control became widely available in the Western world, babies were the de facto product of a sex life. If you wanted to have sex, it was pretty likely you'd have at least one baby, and everybody was "doing it" (having sex and babies). Today's mothers (and some fathers) always seem to act as if we're inhabiting that same world---as if even though I don't have a child today, I'll certainly want one soon, and then I can join the "club" and experience the same things they do.
That's why they're always telling me all about their kids.
Meanwhile, they also want me to give them all kinds of accommodations---from parental leave to bus seats to tax breaks. Again, as if my turn will come around and it will all work out because we're a village and what-not. But it won't work out that way, because I don't want to be a mother. They selfishly ignore my valid life choices, and I resent it. For the longest time, I thought I didn't like kids, but I've spent enough time around them to realize that's not so. Kids can be delightful. It's entitled, inconsiderate, narcissistic parents I can't stand.
There's been a lot of focus on obnoxious upper class parents lately, but I think that that has a great deal to do with the source of the articles (Salon? New York Times? They're not talking about Indianapolis). Plus, then people get to throw in class issues (and envy?) for good measure, for a certain sense of - "you may be financially better off than me, but I'm a better person than you." I think generally (and perhaps rightfully so) people are snarking on parents who walk the world thinking that having kids make them -- and their offspring -- the most special people ever. And the reality is, people have been having kids (and working or not working) since time immemorial, so no, you're not that special. It's hard, but it was hard for everybody. There's a huge tendency towards hyperbole in today's culture (is Donald Trump running the world?) where everything is the HARDEST, everyone is the BEST, the kids are so PERFECT. Eh.
And for parents in general (across all classes), the pendulum currently seems to be firmly in the "they're kids - let them do what they want" in all area. And I think this seems particularly annoying to parents of different generations, the non-parents and the "considerate" parents. For while children will be children, just because they have the urge to climb over the booth and slobber on the windows and shriek at the Cheesecake Factory, doesn't mean that mommy and daddy should allow it. Sometimes Mommy and Daddy gotta step up, parent and say "no". Whether or not it's a McLaren stroller.
There are 2 kind of parents I genuinely hate when I waitress at a restaurant:
1.) The more common "Cuteus Spawnus" These parents can be seen at a crowded restaurant or public place letting their children scream and cry as much as possible, without so much as a "shush." Other acts of these parents include letting their children (Edit: attack) the waitress' legs when she is carrying a large tray and then blaming her for dropping said tray because their children are perfect.
2.) The less common but possibly more evil "Manipulai Abusivus" These parents will bring out their demon spawn in packs of 2-5 and will proceed to scream, curse, and in the extreme, hit their children in front of the restaurant. This causes the other adults around them to become extremely uncomfortable and ask the waitress if she can do anything to stop it, and/or offer sympathy for waiting on such insane people. These parents do not hesitate to call their server rude names including "stupid" and "bitch" and will almost inherently call a manager over to try to manipulate their way into a free meal.
(Disclaimer: I do not like children and I am a waitress. I know, icky situation.)
I get this. And i'm a parent. Those parents who tout little Hecuba and Art and look at you like shit because you can't afford to dress him or her in designer baby clothes (which is fucking stupid, 'cos they get dirty in two minutes!), sometimes feed them fishfingers instead of organic macrobiotic baby porridge, take them to the park instead of baby yoga and got your pushchair second hand from your mum instead of had it specially made by NASA, they piss me off too. I know exactly what you mean, and quite honestly I think it IS about class. They're always the ones who invariably bitch about working mothers, and how they're so much better than you because they stay at home all day with their little angel, but they forget that some people can't afford not to work! (and also that some people have their own lives and maybe don't WANT to stay at home all day... I know I don't.)
On the other hand, you DO get the people who tut and roll their eyes at anything child related. You want to tell them about the exciting thing your kid did today! And why shouldn't you be able to without them going "oh STOP talking about your bloody kid" when all I did was mention something in passing. He's part of my life, why shoudn't I be able to talk about him? And why shouldn't I expect people to be courteous when i'm trying to lug him round in a buggy with a load of bags? I'm not asking for you to lay down your life, i'm just asking for a bit of common courtesy... the kind you'd afford to anyone if you're not an asshole.
I could have killed the woman who brought her baby to the 8pm showing of New Moon and then allowed the child to fuss for a solid 15 mins, disturbing everyone in the theater.
But as much as I hate parents who bring their children to evening movies and resturants with items costing more than $30, I'm amazing by the kid-hate out there.
When one of my co-workers was pregnant, she was very non-baby obsessed, but another co-worker still felt the need to tell the pregnant lady he didn't like kids and didn't want to be around hers. For no reason.
Just on this thread, there are people complaining about a baby being born near their wedding (couldn't they plan better?) and comparing a baby to a Tomagoshi (I can soothe my Tomagoshi, why can't they soothe their kid?). I hope these are jokes, but I doubt they are. Entitled people exist whether they have kids or not.
@clevernamehere: I read both of those comments, and I'm pretty sure that the posters kinda meant them tongue-in-cheek. I could be wrong, of course, but I don't think anyone really thinks calming a baby is as easy as pressing a button on a little video game or that someone had a baby to ruin your wedding. :)
Sadie, I can't believe you don't see the inherent misogyny in railing against a woman due to her status as a parent. Do you not see the disproportionate loathing mothers get? I get just as angry as anyone at SUV parents and clueless upper-middle class types, but their children and their status as a mother has absolutely nothing to do with it. I do not resent them or hate their children.
I can't believe you live in this world and can disingenuously say, on a blog that is supposed to be women-friendly, that women and mothers aren't being discriminated against here. It should be a given for all women that there is discrimination in the mix. It is simply not a world where you can hope for otherwise.
Hana Maru promoted this comment
Edited by napalmnacey is an angry feminist at 11/24/09 1:21 AM
napalmnacey is an angry feminist was starred
napalmnacey is an angry feminist was unstarred
I feel like this article has a lot of anti-mother bias. I don't think there are two legitimate "sides" to this argument. Reinforcing the old notion that mothers must be perfect, have all of the answers & completely control their children AT ALL TIMES is not constructive. Taking care of children is hard WORK. If you are saying that mothers (and mothers in particular because fathers with children are treated much differently) should never bring their kids in public if there's a chance that they might act up or annoy other people, then you are saying mothers belong in the private sphere, period.
Children and their guardians have an equal right to access and enjoy public places. Most guardians do not want their kids to annoy other people. This article is generalizing a great deal, since the "bad parents" are few and far between. Most people just want to have a life & enjoy public spaces. If their kid is going to act out & make noise, well, they are kids, so what. Who are you to dictate where a large, cognizable group of women is allowed to socialize? Why should they "reorganize" their lives to pacify your annoyance?
There are plenty of annoying people out there, often not by their own will. So should we write articles about how annoying it is when mentally handicapped people are "annoying" and loud in public? This article isn't much more than destructive mother-hating/shaming in my opinion.
@Michelle Louise: i don't think that was the point of the article.
There is mother hating out there. Fo'sure. And articles should be written on it by the dozen.
But I think what Sadie is trying to point out is that some hate is specifically directed to a certain group. White, smug, trendy and city-dwelling mothers AND fathers. And regarding parental/child access to certain places - Sadie isn't arguing that mothers and children stay in doors but that a certain group of parents do expect to take their children to previously recognised 'adult only' areas (like bars! with alcohol!)
"I resent that my choice to be child-free subjects me to condescension and pity, even though I'm not the one taking up the whole aisle at Target with said SUV stroller and screaming, unruly brats named after medieval professions."
I have to admit that I laughed really hard at this and think that is sums up my opinion on the matter pretty well.
KATE! promoted this comment
Edited by St. Francis of a Sissy at 11/24/09 12:40 AM
St. Francis of a Sissy was starred
St. Francis of a Sissy was unstarred
@St. Francis of a Sissy: oh my god, those sounds like actual names i wouldn't be surprised to here. especially living in the south where people love to give children first names that are last names. well...maybe not cobbler. although that kid might be delicious.
i had imagined something a bit more absurd like jester, minstrel, scribe and knight.
you know, I'm getting sick of people talking about "parents" like they are some distinct, homogenous, and wholly knowable entity. If i hear the phrase "parents -not all, but some... you know, *those* kind.." or anything like it one more time, my head will explode. If I were to come up to you and say "I'm so sick of women - you know, *those* women- they're ___ (bad drivers, slutty, morally inferior, uppity..)" or "man, those blacks -of course i don't mean you, you're not like the rest of them - they just don't know their place" I'm sure none of you would have any trouble pointing out my sexism or my racism, despite my pathetic disclaimers.
This reads like a reactionary screed written by someone who's heard a million time that she's an awful person for not liking kids. There's bullshit on both sides.
I have to disagree that dads get the same treatment. A dad out in public with a baby is treated like he hung the moon, as if being a good father is the most honorable thing ever. Moms on the other hand are in everyone's way, and should go home where they belong. It is shocking to see the treatment I get in public when with my children compared to my husband's. Women we've never met chat him up, go crazy for the babies, talk about how ADORABLE they are together. I generally get the stink eye - with the same adorable children.
@kate.d.: So true. This is where Sadie lost me. The hate IS directed more at mothers. It's not at all an "equal opportunity resentment. " A father out with his kids gets special, indulgent treatment. A mother is expected to get out of your way and to keep her kids quiet and well-behaved at all times.
I agree with the tenure of the article; aka, everyone stop being assholes for god's sake (and that goes for people without kids too. I'm accosted all the time by plenty of assholes who are completely child free!). But I'm really surprised at the dismissal of an obvious gender inequality on the basis of a single anecdote.
@scullymurphy: Yes, yes, yes. I was most disappointed to see this article here, and to see the supportive comments. Bald-faced misogyny from supposed feminists makes me a sad panda.
@scullymurphy: totally. haven't you heard? babies aren't supposed to cry. unless they are with their dads. in which case, they are crying because Mommy is somewhere neglecting them.
@kate.d.: YES! Oh my goodness, my partner is a great dad, but he's always getting the 'oh what a great dad because he's LOOKING AFTER HIS KID... (like he's fuckin' supposed to... right?)'... which he totally deserved. But I deserve too!
I might be missing the point here but none of this sounds all that new to me.
Just like my high school best friend's stay-at-home mom was openly judgmental of working mothers because she felt their life choices called her life choices into question, I am wary of baby-centric types because their total baby euphoria is not something I understand (or think makes sense) but they usually seem SO SURE of it that it makes me question my babies-can-wait attitude and also fills me with some kind of innate horror that I don't fully understand.
I like kids and I know that I will someday "cave" and go the mommy way. And when I do, I assume I'll go full throttle. I wouldn't be surprised if I end up foregoing work like many of the women I am so alarmed by now. That's where my mommy revulsion comes from: I see some distorted version of myself in the Momiacs and I don't like it.
12/17/09
Mother twitters her son's death. Judgement on mothering abilities ensues.
#mommywars
#tips
11/24/09
Guess which library had by far the worst-behaved kids and parents?
Ah, how I miss them all -- the ones who were always bitching about 10-cent fines and "the principle of the thing" when their jewels returned 1/3rd of a 3-piece audio-visual item they'd checked out (doesn't that count as having returned it?) and the ones who actually did all their childrens' homework because the snowflakes were too busy with important things like soccer. The ones in such a hurry they would complain loudly about the speed bumps that were put in after one of them ran down a kid in the parking lot.
I don't hate mommies, parents, or kids, but this lot will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes if I have my way.
11/24/09
It's a question of appropriate settings and appropriate behavior (from adults and kids!). I recognize that the majority of parents are doing the best they can on the latter, but many are falling off on the former. Some places are not appropriate for kids to be, both from their perspective (they're probably bored to tears at your hip, happening bar, sorry hipster douchebag parents) or from that of the other patrons.
The worst are the ones who get both wrong - badly behaved children in a place kids shouldn't even be (I live in Utah, and nearly every PG13 and R rated movie experience has involved children running feral in the theater), and they aren't a majority, but they sure are a significant minority, and they sure are irritating.
11/24/09
That's why they're always telling me all about their kids.
Meanwhile, they also want me to give them all kinds of accommodations---from parental leave to bus seats to tax breaks. Again, as if my turn will come around and it will all work out because we're a village and what-not. But it won't work out that way, because I don't want to be a mother. They selfishly ignore my valid life choices, and I resent it. For the longest time, I thought I didn't like kids, but I've spent enough time around them to realize that's not so. Kids can be delightful. It's entitled, inconsiderate, narcissistic parents I can't stand.
11/24/09
And for parents in general (across all classes), the pendulum currently seems to be firmly in the "they're kids - let them do what they want" in all area. And I think this seems particularly annoying to parents of different generations, the non-parents and the "considerate" parents. For while children will be children, just because they have the urge to climb over the booth and slobber on the windows and shriek at the Cheesecake Factory, doesn't mean that mommy and daddy should allow it. Sometimes Mommy and Daddy gotta step up, parent and say "no". Whether or not it's a McLaren stroller.
11/24/09
1.) The more common "Cuteus Spawnus" These parents can be seen at a crowded restaurant or public place letting their children scream and cry as much as possible, without so much as a "shush." Other acts of these parents include letting their children (Edit: attack) the waitress' legs when she is carrying a large tray and then blaming her for dropping said tray because their children are perfect.
2.) The less common but possibly more evil "Manipulai Abusivus" These parents will bring out their demon spawn in packs of 2-5 and will proceed to scream, curse, and in the extreme, hit their children in front of the restaurant. This causes the other adults around them to become extremely uncomfortable and ask the waitress if she can do anything to stop it, and/or offer sympathy for waiting on such insane people. These parents do not hesitate to call their server rude names including "stupid" and "bitch" and will almost inherently call a manager over to try to manipulate their way into a free meal.
(Disclaimer: I do not like children and I am a waitress. I know, icky situation.)
11/24/09
On the other hand, you DO get the people who tut and roll their eyes at anything child related. You want to tell them about the exciting thing your kid did today! And why shouldn't you be able to without them going "oh STOP talking about your bloody kid" when all I did was mention something in passing. He's part of my life, why shoudn't I be able to talk about him? And why shouldn't I expect people to be courteous when i'm trying to lug him round in a buggy with a load of bags? I'm not asking for you to lay down your life, i'm just asking for a bit of common courtesy... the kind you'd afford to anyone if you're not an asshole.
11/24/09
But as much as I hate parents who bring their children to evening movies and resturants with items costing more than $30, I'm amazing by the kid-hate out there.
When one of my co-workers was pregnant, she was very non-baby obsessed, but another co-worker still felt the need to tell the pregnant lady he didn't like kids and didn't want to be around hers. For no reason.
Just on this thread, there are people complaining about a baby being born near their wedding (couldn't they plan better?) and comparing a baby to a Tomagoshi (I can soothe my Tomagoshi, why can't they soothe their kid?). I hope these are jokes, but I doubt they are. Entitled people exist whether they have kids or not.
11/24/09
11/24/09
I can't believe you live in this world and can disingenuously say, on a blog that is supposed to be women-friendly, that women and mothers aren't being discriminated against here. It should be a given for all women that there is discrimination in the mix. It is simply not a world where you can hope for otherwise.
11/24/09
Children and their guardians have an equal right to access and enjoy public places. Most guardians do not want their kids to annoy other people. This article is generalizing a great deal, since the "bad parents" are few and far between. Most people just want to have a life & enjoy public spaces. If their kid is going to act out & make noise, well, they are kids, so what. Who are you to dictate where a large, cognizable group of women is allowed to socialize? Why should they "reorganize" their lives to pacify your annoyance?
There are plenty of annoying people out there, often not by their own will. So should we write articles about how annoying it is when mentally handicapped people are "annoying" and loud in public? This article isn't much more than destructive mother-hating/shaming in my opinion.
11/24/09
There is mother hating out there. Fo'sure. And articles should be written on it by the dozen.
But I think what Sadie is trying to point out is that some hate is specifically directed to a certain group. White, smug, trendy and city-dwelling mothers AND fathers. And regarding parental/child access to certain places - Sadie isn't arguing that mothers and children stay in doors but that a certain group of parents do expect to take their children to previously recognised 'adult only' areas (like bars! with alcohol!)
11/24/09
I have to admit that I laughed really hard at this and think that is sums up my opinion on the matter pretty well.
11/24/09
11/24/09
i had imagined something a bit more absurd like jester, minstrel, scribe and knight.
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/24/09
I agree with the tenure of the article; aka, everyone stop being assholes for god's sake (and that goes for people without kids too. I'm accosted all the time by plenty of assholes who are completely child free!). But I'm really surprised at the dismissal of an obvious gender inequality on the basis of a single anecdote.
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/23/09
Just like my high school best friend's stay-at-home mom was openly judgmental of working mothers because she felt their life choices called her life choices into question, I am wary of baby-centric types because their total baby euphoria is not something I understand (or think makes sense) but they usually seem SO SURE of it that it makes me question my babies-can-wait attitude and also fills me with some kind of innate horror that I don't fully understand.
I like kids and I know that I will someday "cave" and go the mommy way. And when I do, I assume I'll go full throttle. I wouldn't be surprised if I end up foregoing work like many of the women I am so alarmed by now. That's where my mommy revulsion comes from: I see some distorted version of myself in the Momiacs and I don't like it.