There's an odd second side to this issue. I spent some time living in the Middle East (Qatar) and I know gay people who say that it is actually easier to live as a gay man in a Muslim country. Male friendships are inherently more touchy-feely than in the US. Walking through a mall in Doha you're far more likely to see two men holding hands and talking than a married couple. This is a typical thing between straight men and nobody would think twice about a gay man holding hands with his lover in public because their being gay simply wouldn't be the first explanation that sprang to mind. Ironically enough, unmarried members of the opposite sex holding hands in public is a social no-no.
I'm certainly not saying that the persecution of gay people in the ME is right, but what we would see as stereotypical "gay" behavior between men wouldn't raise an eyebrow in many Muslim countries. If we look at it from that angle, I could begin to see how one might argue that Western influence has increased homophobia in these countries.
@Antennapedia: If we look at it from that angle, I could begin to see how one might argue that Western influence has increased homophobia in these countries.
Absolutely. There is something about viewing this issue through the lens of a Westerner that turns everything on its head. Men are more touchy feely with each other in public as are women with each other. That I witnessed myself in Abu Dhabi and Doha. Behavior that would get your ass beat down in 90 percent of this country is people openly practiced there.
Muslim cultures have a deeper public/private divide than western cultures do. It's interesting to me that countries with more integrated public/private spheres (which happen to be the more secular ones) i.e. Egypt, Morocco are the places where homosexuals are seeing more violence. Homosexuals in countries/cultures with a more stringent separation of public/private spheres would not have a problem.
There's a lot more to this but I'm having trouble articulating it.
The fact of the matter is that half of the laws across the world that prohibit homosexuality today are derived from a single law that the British enacted in India in 1860. "Many attitudes with regard to sexual morality that are thought to be identical to Islam owe a lot more to Queen Victoria than to the Koran," Rowson says.
This is quite easy to believe. However, I'm reluctant to chalk it all up to repressive Victorian attitudes about sexuality; this reading of the Lot story ties into "literal" translations of religious texts. The literal reading of religious texts is the cornerstone to fundamentalisms, and, cross-culturally, fundamentalisms rise in response to modernity. The influence of British culture, both in terms of repressive ideas about sexuality and in the introduction of Western modernity to various Islamic cultures likely gave rise to this religious interpretation.
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: When there is one Q, it's generally taken to mean 'queer'. Two Qs includes 'questioning'. The queer communities as a whole tend not to include 'questioning' because it's an impermanent state, by definition.
Thanks for this. Islam does not exist in a vacuum, and is not inherently more dangerous, violent, or extreme than any other religion. Islam as it's practiced today does not always look like it does in Saudi Arabia, Iran or Pakistan, variation in personal practices vary in these countries as well.
Fundamentalist religion has been a political and social tool for subjugation repeatedly in history. This rigid interpretation of Islam is no different. Islamic law, values and ethics, as interpreted in the 7th and 8th centuries, provided the foundation for the Renaissance. Same Quran, different interpretations.
My heart breaks for the men and women who are so persecuted.
@funzette: "Islam does not exist in a vacuum, and is not inherently more dangerous, violent, or extreme than any other religion."
It depends on what you mean by Islam.
If you mean the books themselves, I agree: all the three major monos are pretty much equally bad.
If however you mean how these religions are practiced today (whether measuring by what the extreme ends believe or some mean/median) Islam is more inherently dangerous and violent than Judaism or Christianity from my perspective as a member of the LGBTIQ community.
Go to an average Christian or Jewish majority country and I might be condemned, shunned, and subject to harassment. My particular way of having sex might even be criminalized. Now go to your average majority Muslim country and the violence and discrimination may be the same or worse.... however if I get caught having sex with my partner, we could be imprisoned, flogged publicly, or even executed.
Here's an ever-so-slightly off-topic question. Is there a more handy term than "LGBTQI"? (I'll admit, I've never seen the "I" added myself, but I think it makes a lot of sense. I often get a confused "Q?" when I say "LGBTQ".)
On the one hand, I like that the moniker points to the diversity of people included under it. On the other hand, it's just not easily sayable, and I feel like there are only more sexual permutations that we'll want to include as we go on.
@Laulau: I think it might be listed as LGBTQQI these days (queer, questioning, and intersex). And sometimes with an A on the end for ally. Some of my friends in the queer community lovingly refer to it as alphabet soup.
@Laulau: I use queer (as in "queer community" or "queer individuals") - I write for a gay website and writing out the whole alphabet over and over again can get tiresome. But I can also see how some wouldn't particularly care for the "reclaiming" of that term.
@Laulau: I find starting with the G, not the L, helps. I never heard LGBT until I moved to Australia--it was always GLBT, which rolls off the tongue much more easily, I find. Starting with a harder consonant and all that.
So, they're saying that Islam was virtually absent of homophobia before the influence of modern Western (I assume, Christian) influence in the 20th century? That seems pretty hard to believe. But, I'm not religious.
@Penny: from what I understand, while the Quran has very similar passages to those found in the Old Testament (eg Lot, Sodom and Gomorrah), Islamic civilizations were pretty tolerant and sex-positive, and examples of gay imagery was found in lots of art forms. I don't think that anyone can claim that there wasn't homophobia (and sexism, lots of sexism), but certainly not at the levels we see now.
Politics, oil, tribalism, isolationism - you can't separate this stuff out from why interpretations of Islam have shifted so radically over the last 100 or so years.
@Penny: It's more that the categories of "gay" and "straight" didn't exist, so homophobia as we know it today couldn't exist -- instead, people relied on sexual categories based on age, social role, and sex. So, from what I've read (and it's been a little while, so I might not have this 100% correct), it was similar to ancient Greece: most folks were okay with an older man getting it on with a younger man as long as the older man also had a wife and family and the younger man was assumed to grow up to acquire same. Things got sticky (ha!) if two men of the same age wanted to get it on, or if a man decided he only wanted to sleep with dudes and skip out on fulfilling his social role as husband/father/family patriarch.
Two books I recommend if you're really interested: Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500-1900 by Dror Ze'evi and Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800 by Khaled El-Rouayheb.
Two things: 1. Cute hijab. I want to have that scarf. I want to wear it with my black business coat and throw it over my shoulder like a contienental soldier.
2. Cute soldier. Israeli soldiers are my downfall. Seriously. Yum.
3. Boarder crossings: one day will be a thing of the past. I refuse to believe differently.
Ok, now you're just taunting me. I'm leaving off the cultural learnings for this one -- I think I've done enough pontificating (rabbi-ficating?) over the past couple of days.
I wonder if y'all will believe me, but God I miss home.
@hebrewhammer770: If you think acknowledging the existence of palestinians is anti-Israel, you obviously think less of Israel and the Israeli people than Jezebel does.
@hebrewhammer770: ...Actually, Jezebel is being incredibly balanced on this issue today, since there's a snap judgment that was posted earlier of a group of smiling girls at a rally in Jerusalem today.
@hebrewhammer770: Am I really slow for thinking it was a joke instead of a serious comment? A play on the "Stop being so anti-Israel Jezebel!" from a few days ago?
Ok, this is so shallow and probably inappropriate in light of the editors' very thoughtful juxtaposition of the last two SJ photos and the weighty socio-political issues they implicate, but...
That guard on the left who's looking at the camera is MAD hot.
@Lucille van Pelt: True fucking fact. On Birthright, they send a group of soldiers on leave with every bus so that you get to hang out with israelis your own age, and all of them were incredibly hot.
@MizJenkins: Dude - Israeli guys? HOT. And I, um, got around them parts a bit. So I, ah, know a thing or two. In a word: HOT.
(Also probably HOT in the other sense, with all that gear on -- my olfactory memory of the distinct odor [not unpleasant] of an Israeli army uniform after it's been out in the sun for awhile is very strong. Just looking at them, it's like I can smell it. But I digress!)
@ellaesther: Don't I know it... Most of my exes have been Black or Jewish. Israeli men seem to offer a great compromise - Jewish men with swagger. Yum!
@MizJenkins: I suggest you give it ago. One of the most halarious moments of my life came 4 or 5 years ago. When my crazy-strict Muslim auntie found out I was dating a former IDF soldier. My parents, while a bit perturbed, had met him and were sorta half in half out.
But she sat me in her room for 2 hours telling me all about Israeli soldiers.
Whatever.
He was fine. --this needs to play into the peace process somehow. I'll hammer out the details later--
@ellaesther: i think it's getting a lot of coverage because netanyahu and obama just met and obama told him to stop building new settlements, and secy of state clinton even said that so-called "natural growth" of settlements was unacceptable.
netanyahu ran on an ant-two-state solution platform, among other things, and now wants palestinians to recognize israel as a specifically jewish state (even though 20% of the people in israel are not jewish and jewish israelis themselves are divided on whether or not israel should be a jewish state vs a state for jews) so there's a lot of interest in how he'll deal with this development.
@Kristina B: Oy, I know. If you check my comment history, you'll see that I've been obsessing about the situation for a quarter of a century now.... Most recently on these boards!
And I think badmutha's point might have been, though I'm not sure, that we Jezebelles been seeing an awful lot of the conflict lately!
09/18/09
I'm certainly not saying that the persecution of gay people in the ME is right, but what we would see as stereotypical "gay" behavior between men wouldn't raise an eyebrow in many Muslim countries. If we look at it from that angle, I could begin to see how one might argue that Western influence has increased homophobia in these countries.
09/19/09
Absolutely. There is something about viewing this issue through the lens of a Westerner that turns everything on its head. Men are more touchy feely with each other in public as are women with each other. That I witnessed myself in Abu Dhabi and Doha. Behavior that would get your ass beat down in 90 percent of this country is people openly practiced there.
09/18/09
There's a lot more to this but I'm having trouble articulating it.
09/18/09
This is quite easy to believe. However, I'm reluctant to chalk it all up to repressive Victorian attitudes about sexuality; this reading of the Lot story ties into "literal" translations of religious texts. The literal reading of religious texts is the cornerstone to fundamentalisms, and, cross-culturally, fundamentalisms rise in response to modernity. The influence of British culture, both in terms of repressive ideas about sexuality and in the introduction of Western modernity to various Islamic cultures likely gave rise to this religious interpretation.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Fundamentalist religion has been a political and social tool for subjugation repeatedly in history. This rigid interpretation of Islam is no different. Islamic law, values and ethics, as interpreted in the 7th and 8th centuries, provided the foundation for the Renaissance. Same Quran, different interpretations.
My heart breaks for the men and women who are so persecuted.
09/18/09
It depends on what you mean by Islam.
If you mean the books themselves, I agree: all the three major monos are pretty much equally bad.
If however you mean how these religions are practiced today (whether measuring by what the extreme ends believe or some mean/median) Islam is more inherently dangerous and violent than Judaism or Christianity from my perspective as a member of the LGBTIQ community.
Go to an average Christian or Jewish majority country and I might be condemned, shunned, and subject to harassment. My particular way of having sex might even be criminalized. Now go to your average majority Muslim country and the violence and discrimination may be the same or worse.... however if I get caught having sex with my partner, we could be imprisoned, flogged publicly, or even executed.
Sorry, but that is !=.
09/18/09
On the one hand, I like that the moniker points to the diversity of people included under it. On the other hand, it's just not easily sayable, and I feel like there are only more sexual permutations that we'll want to include as we go on.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Man, I crack myself up.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Politics, oil, tribalism, isolationism - you can't separate this stuff out from why interpretations of Islam have shifted so radically over the last 100 or so years.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Two books I recommend if you're really interested: Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500-1900 by Dror Ze'evi and Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800 by Khaled El-Rouayheb.
09/19/09
09/19/09
05/21/09
1. Cute hijab. I want to have that scarf. I want to wear it with my black business coat and throw it over my shoulder like a contienental soldier.
2. Cute soldier. Israeli soldiers are my downfall. Seriously. Yum.
3. Boarder crossings: one day will be a thing of the past. I refuse to believe differently.
05/21/09
05/21/09
I wonder if y'all will believe me, but God I miss home.
05/21/09
05/21/09
/snark (Please don't yell at me)
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
I'm confused...
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
That guard on the left who's looking at the camera is MAD hot.
::hangs horny head in shame::
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
(Also probably HOT in the other sense, with all that gear on -- my olfactory memory of the distinct odor [not unpleasant] of an Israeli army uniform after it's been out in the sun for awhile is very strong. Just looking at them, it's like I can smell it. But I digress!)
05/21/09
05/21/09
Most of my exes have been Black or Jewish. Israeli men seem to offer a great compromise - Jewish men with swagger. Yum!
(Sadly, I have yet to test this theory)
05/21/09
One of the most halarious moments of my life came 4 or 5 years ago. When my crazy-strict Muslim auntie found out I was dating a former IDF soldier.
My parents, while a bit perturbed, had met him and were sorta half in half out.
But she sat me in her room for 2 hours telling me all about Israeli soldiers.
Whatever.
He was fine.
--this needs to play into the peace process somehow. I'll hammer out the details later--
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
netanyahu ran on an ant-two-state solution platform, among other things, and now wants palestinians to recognize israel as a specifically jewish state (even though 20% of the people in israel are not jewish and jewish israelis themselves are divided on whether or not israel should be a jewish state vs a state for jews) so there's a lot of interest in how he'll deal with this development.
05/21/09
And I think badmutha's point might have been, though I'm not sure, that we Jezebelles been seeing an awful lot of the conflict lately!