<![CDATA[Jezebel: mental health]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: mental health]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/mental health http://jezebel.com/tag/mental health <![CDATA[ A new study of New Zealanders purports to ... ]]> A new study of New Zealanders purports to show that womean who have abortions are more likely to suffer from depression and addiction. The 500 Kiwis were interviewed 6 times in 15 years, which is hardly enough to determine whether they had previous mental health problems, and are counted — for the purposes of the addiction question — with women who suffered miscarriages. In addition, no one thought to ask them whether getting pregnant accounted for part of their distress nor were they controlled for prior mental health issues. Of course, none of this means that anti-choicers won't use the study to tell us how terrible we will feel when we murder the Children of the Jeebus residing in our uteri. [University of Otago]

]]>
Jezebel-5100482 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:15:00 EST Megan http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100482&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Are Middle-Aged Women Down In The Dumps? I Ask My Mom ]]> According to the World Health Organization, suicide rates have increased by 60 percent in the last 45 years, with depression — shockingly — as the leading cause. Recently, the numbers have jumped sharply in the U.S., and the trend — a .7% rise in six years — is driven largely by an unexpected group: middle-aged white women. Whereas teens, young adults and elderly men have traditionally been the focus of suicide-prevention, these findings may alter the mental health world's perception of "high-risk." Everyone agrees this is an undeniable demographic trend, but the real question is: why?

First, the stats: whereas suicides amongst white men 40-64 rose 2.7%, the corresponding female demographic experienced a 3.9% jump, with a particularly dramatic rise (57%) in the number of deaths by poisoning. Says one researcher, "Definitely these are not just little blips...We are looking at a big population change." No one quoted, however, advances a theory about the causes of the trend. "Are these people living alone, with no major responsibility or others to take care of, or are they people overwhelmed with all of the jobs and responsibilities they have? We need to find out more about the conditions under which these people are living." Well, yes, we do.

It's no secret that women suffer from far higher levels of depression than do men; the factors are both physiological and psychological and, as has been suggested on this site, women are probably just more aware of depression generally. But a precipitate rise like this suggests factors beyond the biological. Consider Dodai's recent post in which she commented on the finding that a depressing number of women feel their "life is over" at 44. Another British study, this one sponsored by Dove, reports that "negative attitudes by employers and society in general make women over the age of 45 feel unrecognized and unsupported," pervasive ageism prevents them from achieving goals and that those older women who do accomplish things are not recognized. In a society that worships youth, aging is not easy. Nor, one imagines, is empty-nesting, later-life career woes and relationship problems, health worries or financial struggle. And certainly these pressures have only increased.

While considering these issues, I decided to consult someone in this demographic: my 58-year-old mother, no stranger to this phenomenon. As I suspected, she had a lot to say. Her feeling is that it is not a coincidence that these women belong to the Boomer generation. "Because we were such a huge generation, and because, I think, our parents' generation had been through so much, we were pandered to in an unprecedented way," she says, "in advertising, society, everything. And we were all so defined by being young that we took an adversarial attitude towards age that has made things very hard as we grow older."

(She then went off on a tangent about women who are willing to "shoot poison into their faces" lest they fall into "one of the two acceptable modes of aging: cute or creepy.")

And women specifically? "Never before," said my mom, "were there such high expectations for women. My mother may have been disappointed with aspects of her life, but she did not feel like a failure. Whereas, we were the first who were encouraged to dream really big. We did, and a lot of us failed to realize those dreams. We felt we had far more riding on it than men, so the crisis in some ways is probably more painful."

I am sure that further studies will do far more to illuminate the root causes of these trends — socio-economic and otherwise. Whatever the findings, the solution is quite obviously better mental health care and perhaps a widening of demographic scope; ultimately, stopping something so tragically destructive is far more important, short-term, than the theory. But it is worth considering the pressures and advantages of this generation of women, unique in history and society; change, for good and bad, is very rough work.

Middle-Aged Women Drive Rise In U.S. Suicides [MSNBC]

Related: How Prejudice Holds Back Women Over 45 [Daily Express]

Earlier: Why Do Some Women Think That Life Is Over By Age 44?

]]>
Jezebel-5066632 Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EDT Sadie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5066632&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Researchers in London have completed a study ... ]]> Researchers in London have completed a study for which they polled Bangladeshi students about clothing choices, and, after two years, assessed their mental health. Interestingly, they found that women who wore traditional Bangladeshi garments "were less likely to suffer later from psychological problems, such as depression," than those who assimilated. Men, however, seemed better adjusted if they wore Western clothing. A researcher says that perhaps conformity to tradition is more stressed to girls, and that such conformity may result in greater acceptance and security. [Scientific American]

]]>
Jezebel-5061848 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:20:00 EDT Sadie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061848&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Teen Vogue</i>'s Crazy Beautiful Shoot: What's Your Damage? ]]> The September issue of Teen Vogue has a makeup feature called "Crazy Beautiful." And perhaps unintentionally, the model showcased looks a little… crazy. Is she supposed to be making us imagine which mental illness symptoms she has? Probably not. And yet. Three pictures, with three diagnoses, after the jump.











Paranoia.

Hearing voices.

Mania.

]]>
Jezebel-5032913 Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032913&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Study: Child Adoptees More Likely To Turn Into Teen Terrors ]]> zahara5608.jpgIf wee Zahara Jolie-Pitt turns out to be a total goth who listens to Morrissey nonstop and refuses to leave her room, Brad and Angie shouldn't blame themselves; adopted children are twice as likely to be diagnosed with an emotional or behavioral problem, says a new study out of the University of Minnesota. According to Time, "foreign adoptees are far more likely to internalize their problems, suffering more commonly from depression or separation anxiety disorders," explaining Zahara's potential black-clad teenhood. "Domestic adoptees, on the other hand, tend to act out." Before the University of Minnesota's research, it was assumed that adoptees were diagnosed with mental health issues more frequently than other children because their parents were often wealthy and had better access to psychiatric care than the average child; this study suggests that that the disparity could be due to genetics or poor perinatal care. "The deleterious effects may quite possibly have come before the adoption ever took place," study author, psychologist Margaret Keyes points out.

The Minnesota research team assessed 540 non-adopted adolescents, 514 internationally-adopted adolescents and 178 domestically-adopted adolescents from the ages of 11 to 21, according to a press release. The study also interviewed adoptees directly, as opposed to relying on questionnaires filled out by parents, as prior studies had.

Keyes made sure to emphasize to Time that even though adoptees are more likely to have a rough time during adolescence, potential parents shouldn't be deterred. "Males are likelier to have behavior issues... But no one is overly concerned about having boys," Keyes said. She also added, "All adolescents struggle with finding their identity. It makes sense adopted children would struggle more than most."

Adoptees More Likely to be Troubled [Time]
US Teens Adopted As Infants Appear To Have Moderately Increased Odds Of Mental Health Problems [EurekAlert]

]]>
Jezebel-387505 Tue, 06 May 2008 09:30:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387505&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Are Men Less Likely To Be Depressed Because They Don't Even Know What It Is? ]]> eternalsadness043008.jpgThe National Alliance on Mental Illness has announced that while 18 million Americans experience depression every year, one in eight women get depressed, which is twice the rate of depression in men. Twice the rate. In addition, depression hits minorities the most: Middle-aged Hispanic women have the highest rate, then middle-aged African-American women. Young Asian-American women have the second highest rate of suicide among those ages 15 to 24. There are many reasons that women are more likely to experience depression: In addition to genetic factors, brain chemistry issues, and psychosocial losses or changes, there are things that women have to deal with that men usually do not. "Some experiences are unique to women," Dr. Ken Duckworth of the NAMI says, "including post-partum changes, infertility and hormonal fluctuations throughout their lives." But one has to wonder: Do men even realize what depression is?



It's been reported time and time again that men are less likely to go to the doctor. Unless they're seriously injured and need stitches, lots of men never deal with health issues. Personally, I've known guys who were clearly depressed and did nothing about it. Friends and boyfriends who had all the symptoms but — as is often the case with men — didn't feel as though they "needed" to see a doctor. That somehow they would "snap out of it." Pair this up with the fact that some dudes love using the word "drama" anytime a woman exhibits emotion, and you've got a recipe for an aversion to dealing with feelings. This might be anecdotal, but surely the National Alliance on Mental Illness gets its statistics from people who actually see a mental health professional? If some dude is walking around depressed but undiagnosed, does he count?

Women depressed at twice the rate of men [UPI]
Women and Depression [NAMI]
Earlier: Boys Who Use The Word Drama: An Investigation
In Defense of Depression
In Post-Industrial Society, Women Are Either "Princess Crazy" Or Her Handmaidens
Related: When booking a doctor's visit, gender plays a role [MSNBC]

]]>
Jezebel-385613 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385613&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Many "Crazy Girls" Are Really Wandering This Earth Anyway? ]]> gi.jpgHere's a little story about an exception that proves the rule: Susan Monica Kriss, 23, was arraigned today on charges she falsely accused a man of hatching a plot with Al Qaeda to hijack a plane to Egypt. The guy turned out to be Susan's ex-boyfriend; Egypt was where he planned to marry another girl. Pretty crazy, right? Yeah, she crazy. But is "Crazy Girl" really a type? The latest Details claims she is. "She may have taken the form of the smoky-eyed goth brooder, the tortured heiress, or the unhinged sorority girl. Whatever her identity, chances are she was intoxicatingly sexy, intense, unstable, mercurial, and impossible to be at ease around in social settings. She was completely and debilitatingly exhausting." Hmmmm. Okay, but how may girls are really like that? Aren't most of them going through a phase? Or acting out in response to dudes who, in the word of one "Crazy Girl"-holic, look at a girl with dark eyeliner and see "a little wounded bird"? Still, I'm sick of blaming dudes for everything all of a sudden.

(Not forever. Just for today!) Who are these crazy girls? I have some friends who have gone through crazy phases — but now they're normal. (Thank God.) Am I crazy? Aren't a lot of "crazy girl" attributes — spontaneity, playfulness, liking dirty sex, delusions of grandeur — really just normal dude things? Yes. I guess it is fairly easy to earn the designation of "crazy" when you're not the gender that gave the world Hitler/Rasputin/Mao/ Kim Il-Sung/ Sapurmurat Niyazov or Osama Bin Laden. Um, I guess that means we're lucky!

Why Can't You Resist This Woman? [Details]

]]>
Jezebel-368934 Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:00:49 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368934&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Should "News" Outlets Leave Britney Alone? ]]> britneyalone021908.jpgOver on Portƒolio.com, Jeff Bercovici writes about Asra Nomani, a former Wall Street Journal reporter and People contributor who thinks that responsible news organizations must lay off Britney Spears because she is mentally ill. "By exploiting Spears' moment of vulnerability, media companies have crossed the line of basic moral decency," wrote Ms. Nomani in an op-ed for the LA Times. Ms. Nomani, whose brother has been diagnosed with schizo-affective disorder, suggests People, Page Six and everyone just stop. "Time Warner Inc., News Corp. and others should halt all coverage of Spears until she is healthy. Let's leave Britney and her family alone."

Ms. Nomani has also told her editor at People that she will no longer write for the magazine. Bercovici talked to Larry Hackett, the managing editor of the weekly magazine, who says not covering something is not what the press does: "I don't know of any examples where the media unilaterally says 'We will not cover this because we feel it's invasive.' I just don't know of any case where that's happened and where it's worked out."

He continues: "I think the story she's going through is something we can cover responsibly, at least at this stage, without knowingly and unquestionably contributing to her mental illness." And today, People.com has a story called "The Britney Effect: The Impact a Year After Her Buzz Cut," which revisits the salon where the pop star shaved her head, as well as the tattoo parlor she visited after her buzz cut. Invasive? Maybe not. But newsworthy?

Britney Spears, Mental Illness and the Tabloids [Portƒolio]
The Britney Effect: The Impact a Year After Her Buzz Cut [People]

]]>
Jezebel-358029 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:00:00 EST Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358029&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Do You Solve A Problem Like Britney? ]]> britbrit011008.jpgReports are coming in that Britney left L.A. and went to Mexico with her new boyfriend, paparazzo Adnan Ghalib, because her family was planning an intervention. (Between her parents and Dr. Phil, is it any wonder she'd feel the urge to skip town?) But Patt Morrison of the Los Angeles Times suggests that what Britney really needs is reform of the California mental healthcare code. "In the 1950s and '60s, care for the mentally ill gave off a Dickensian vibe," she writes. "People were locked away in state hospitals for months, years, for life. Too many times, they weren't insane — just old and dotty, or inconvenient, or different and difficult." Back in the day, a person could be put away just for walking down the street talking to herself. Attacking a car with an umbrella or the head-shaving incident? Britney would have been in a straightjacket.



The system was reformed about 40 years ago: Legislators created laws that gave mental patients rights and made it harder to lock them up for long periods against their will. Now, writes Morrison, "There's a Mad Pride movement among some mental patients who say they have a right to be crazy. And there are heartbroken families begging the courts time and again to intervene on behalf of loved ones who won't take medicine, won't see doctors." How do you help someone who doesn't want help?

Laura's Law, which became effective in 2003, is a California statute that allows a judge to order treatment for someone after medical and legal hearings. It was named after honor student Laura Wilcox, who was working at a mental health center when she was killed by a man who couldn't be forced to take his meds. Morrison asks, "What would a Britney's Law look like?" And is a new law the answer, or does it lie elsewhere?

Britney's Law? Not so crazy [LA Times]
Report: Spears is in Mexico, not N.Y [UPI]

]]>
Jezebel-343496 Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:30:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343496&view=rss&microfeed=true