Of course she's not going to see the causes, even when they're right in her face. From her own observations: But I did ask them directly what they felt about their size. Kayleigh described herself as 'plump' and said she did worry about the health issues surrounding being overweight, but felt there was no help for people like her.
...
She has a point there. West Bromwich boasts a vast new art centre called The Public that cost £65m to build and is universally despised.
The town could have had an Olympic-class sports centre for that kind of money. The locals would have settled for a half-decent swimming pool. ...
'We had a local pool but they closed it because people kept getting attacked at night,' says Kayleigh.
'Now there's nothing, nowhere to go, no parks, no pool.'...
West Brom may have no swimming pool, but it has fast food outlets galore...
You couldn't eat healthily in this town if you tried.
...
There's a historical factor, too, that I hadn't taken in.
'There's a culture of food that's regionally determined...This area was very industrial, where people worked extremely hard. Their jobs were really physical, so they could afford to eat a lot of fat-rich food and consume high levels of calories because they were burning it off.'
This 'food history' creates a habit that's hard to break..
Hey look, lady!You found some reasons that don't come loaded with a moral judgement! All that stuff at the front, after the bit about you being a fattist, of course, where you said that maybe you're missing something, there it is! A whole bunch of good solid reasons, from good solid investigative work, that point to something other than fat=lazy, stupid slob! Such a shame you couldn't see past your own preconcieved ideas of what lies at the core of the problem.
I find fattists disgusting. They are ignorant and choose to see their obsession with being thin as a moral victory, rather than just a personal trait. They ignore the core reasons why so many people are obese - from lack of good food to eating disorders to genetics to the fact that many obese people take great care of those around them and end up having little time to take care of themselves to the fact that some people just store more weight than others. Fattists reduce the world to one thing - size - and do it out of choice. It's just as silly as reducing the world to any other trait, but sadly it's still accepted as okay to be fattist.
Why is it that these people who purport to be so concerned about the "health" of overweight people feel like they need to attack overweight people themselves for their assumed lack of will power instead of, oh, say, the consumer goods companies shoving saturated fat and sugar and preservatives into everything on the supermarket shelves? Or maybe the FDA whose regulations are so lax as to allow this shit because they're led and staffed by the former leaders of the food producers? The giant corporations that create monopolies over the farmers, making sure they're fattening up their livestock with as much hormone as possible? Aren't these the bad guys?
It'd be a lovely world indeed where we could all pluck fresh produce from trees and plants in our backyard, but it ain't the world we live in lady. So shut your damn pie hole and quit trying to mask your simple aesthetic disgust with some sort of global concern for health.
There's an overwhelming tendency on this site to dismiss, as Sadie calls it, "the reflexive equation of size with health." Okay listen: anyone with a brain understands the notion of a healthy weight range, and most of us don't judge (in fact, don't really give a shit about) people whom we perceive to fall outside of that range. But when someone looks full-on obese, are you going to tell me that that person has absolutely no weight-related health issues? I understand that the underlying issue is the "normal" people's condescension of the obese, ie "I look healthy = I am healthy = I am better than you." But I don't see how more or less telling us not to connect obesity to health problems is helpful.
@voteforme: Because talking about obesity as though it's evil, because it's also generally bad for you is counter-productive. See "fat shaming". People who are obese to the point of poor health aren't stupid, they know the health facts as well as smaller people do. So constantly conflating fat with bad health and laziness serves only to make people feel like shit, needlessly.
Also, the writer's issue is obviously not about health, as Sadie pointed out. It's about aesthetics and what kind of people this woman prefers to see occupying the space around her.
@Blueberry26: I'm aware of all that, and I was making a general statement about the site, not about this article in particular. I don't often care about what other people get up to when it only affects them, but there are obese people out there like Beth Ditto who claim to be healthy (I believe she has made statements as such). It's one thing to go about your life and to be happy with yourself while you're doing it, but when you flagrantly lie to me, you're subject to my scrutiny.
@voteforme: But you have no idea what the status of Beth Ditto's health is. Are you her doctor? Have you been snooping in her health records? No. All you know is what she looks like. So how can you say that she is lying?
There's more at work here than socio-economics. There's also attitude, both hers and of the obese. Hers is unhelpful at best but some of the obese take pride in their size and eating habits I'm sorry to say.
I've gotten flamed for dressing down some Mom online for feeding her 9 month old chocolate formula. Then there was the Mom that bragged about her 10 month old being able to scarf (her word, not mine) down an entire slice of pepperoni pizza. We're not talking the economically depressed here, we're taking about soccer Mom's that have full access to fruits/veggies.
Look don't get me wrong my kids get french fries etc. But not all the time and not at the expense of real food.
I hate the authors attitude here. I agree w/pp that Jamie Oliver does a muuuch better job.
I wish there was a more vocal movement to address the real issues behind the obesity epidemic, such as the social inequality and economic pressures that are driving it. The rhetoric of "fat people are gross" does no one any good.
I'm not even sure what is being done about the real issues, if anything, because it's completely drowned out by the malignant shrieking of fatty-hating harpies.
...And whatever the male equivalent of harpies would be. (is there one?)
Jamie Oliver's response to the fat epidemic was to go to a provincial city in England and use it as the start of an incentive to get people in non-posh areas more aware of eating healthy. THAT'S how you do it, miss.
I have a question for folks who live or have lived in the UK:
In the U.S., it's becoming a well-known fact that there is a direct relation between poverty and obesity, i.e. the least healthful of foods are also the least expensive, so people who have a limited income have a tendency to be overweight. Is it the same in the UK?
I'm well-read on food issues in the U.S. but I will admit that I've no idea what's going on in other countries.
@Remedios Varo can't see no huevos.: Uh..people say the same thing about the UK. I just don't get it though. (Food here isn't as cheap overall as in the States, btw, just as a perspective thing.) And while yes, junk food can be cheap, takeaways aren't cheap, and I really think that fresh fruit and veg are cheaper than ready-meals. And cutting out sweets, crisps, biscuits and sugar drinks from your shopping will always save you money! But regardless of my musings, and however it works out, it is definitely the case that there is a negative correlation between income and BMI.
@clochette: having lived in both countries I will say that McDonalds and other fast food stores are noticebly cheaper in the US as opposed to the UK. I was pretty blown away by just how cheap they were when I came here. Also clochette is right food isn't as cheap in the UK, that said I think the fruit and veg etc being cheaper very much depends on where in the UK you live and what is available etc. In parts of Scotland i lived in the cheapest food available was certainly not the healthiest and it was very hard to to track down fresh fruit and veg. So there's probably a big variety depending on the area you live in.
@clochette: fresh fruit and veggies are only cheap if you can get to a place to buy them. If it takes an extra hour to take a bus to the store where there's decent fresh produce, and you have to make that trip 4 times a month instead of once or twice a month, because fresh food goes bad while frozen or canned food keeps, then it's not cheaper anymore. I don't know what it's like in the U.K as compared to the U.S, but ehre the availability of healthy food and fresh veggies is a real issue. Even as a middle class person, I ate worse when I lived in the midwest, because I didn't have a car, so twice a month I would walk or take the bus to the nearest grocery store and then take a cab back. I couldn't just pop over to the store when I wanted something, and I had to factor in the cost of cabfare back, so I couldn't take a bunch of extra trips. I didn't buy two weeks worth of fresh veggies, because by week 2 most of them would have started to spoil. Now I live three blocks from a whole foods, and it's no biggie to have fresh veggies or salad every day.
@intime: There was no whole foods in the entire state that I lived in most recently, but that's not so much the point. Do you have a car? If not, does your city have safe, affordable public transit that runs reliably, 24 hours, or close to it, and doesn't make it difficult to get from the parts of town where poor people live to the parts of town where nice grocery stories are, because indirect subway routes necessitate multiple transfers? There was a whole foods in midwestern city I lived in before the last one, but it was in the wealthiest section of the city, out of walking distance, which meant getting there and back was dependant on a bus that only came once an hour, which added a lot of extra planning and waiting time to a simple trip. I'm walking distance from the whole foods now because I make more money than I did as a student, but even if I weren't, having a subway system that runs late means I'm not confined to doing grocery shopping from between 9 am and 6 (when the busses switched the night route and took longer, if they still stopped near the grocery store at all.)
@samethingwedoeverynightpinky: You don't need to shop at Whole Foods to get healthy food. I shop at Fry's because I'm a poor college student, and I'm able to find a pretty good selection of produce. Not the best, admittedly, but adequate. Also, frozen fruits and veggies are both cheaper and more convenient. For me the temptation to buy junk and ready made food comes more from convenience than price because the cost difference in making a good, healthy home-cooked meal and buying something from McDonald's is small. One just takes a lot more planning and effort.
@Blueberry26: And if you're working two jobs and trying to take care of children, planning and effort are exactly what you don't have time or energy for.
@Blueberry26: No, whole foods only entered the conversation because I happen to live nextdoor to one now, and it's more produce than I've seen in one place in years. But, there are entire neighborhoods where there are no grocery stores at all, only convenience stores or bodegas. Even when there are grocery stores, the availability and qualitiy of produce varies greatly among them-- even stores that are part of the same chain have better quality produce in higher income neighborhoods.
When I lived in the city with the far away whole foods, the only grocery store within walking distance of my apartment was catered to college students, was small and cramped, and had very limited produce. They were cheap, and they delivered, so I shopped there more often than not just because it was convenient. I bought a lot of forzen veggies (more expensive than fresh) and in season, I could supplement with purchases from the farmer's market, but that was only possible because my student schedule allowed me to be home in the middle of the day on a wednesday, when the farmer's market was open. If I had kids/multiple jobs/fewer friends with cars, all of my groceries would have come from the cheap, nearby store.
@Blueberry26: Poor college students still have more free money and more flexible hours than those who are actually poor or even those who work lower middle income careers. The flexible hours thing is very important: college students can re-arrange their time and schedules so they can have time to prepare home-cooked meals whenever they want. A parent can't necessarily do that; families are generally on much more rigid schedules than college students, and children need to be fed more regularly than college students.
She is rude and mean and unhelpful. But how do we talk about - not about the appearance of people - but about their long-term health? Obesity is a huge health problem and while I understand that not every overweight-looking person is unhealthy in some way, this is a health crisis and we need to be able to talk about it without being cruel.
It is very difficult to talk about racism without appearing racist and it's equally difficult to talk about obesity without appearing fattist. How do we do this? I haven't been able to navigate the language in a way that doesn't upset someone.
@DramaClub: "It is very difficult to talk about racism without appearing racist and it's equally difficult to talk about obesity without appearing fattist. "
I think that's entirely untrue unless you actually are racist or fattist.
@thesciencegirl: I don't think so. I think they are both very sensitive issues and each person will have a personal reaction to any discussion on either subject. Whether remarks are perceived as racist or fattist depends a lot upon the context of the discussion and the listener's own personal experiences with either subject. Something so personal as race or obesity gives those different perceptions much more emotional weight.
It's easier to talk about these things with people who know you and know your heart; it's much more difficult to talk about them in a forum like this where you can't see where the writer is coming from.
@thesciencegirl: word. i get that navigating different levels of PC can be cumbersome at times, but all in all, there is a huge difference between
1)having a fact based and empathetic civil discussion about race or weight and
2)having a generalization based and/or condescending/rife with privilege discussion about race or weight.
the latter would not only "appear" racist/fattist, that's simply what it would be.
civil discussions happen all the time here. perhaps DramaClub hasn't been here long enough to be aware of this?
@thesciencegirl: I love how you've been cutting through the bullshit on this thread. Here's a thought, if it's difficult for you to talk about race without being construed as racist, maybe you're racist.
@DramaClub: I really agree here, it's SO hard to be heard properly here sometimes, and it's SO hard to say anything but "everyone is perfect and wonderful and nobody needs to change anything in the slightest" without being shot down. and yes i know i'm exaggerating, but it really is hard to talk about this stuff.
I do agree with the majority of health professionals that there is a correlation (largely speaking) between obesity and ill health. I do have a gut -not rational or compassionate or reasonable or realistic - reaction that tells me that someone who has a roll of fat obscuring their groin, or wings of fat behind their shoulders, does not look the way a human being aught to look. based on centuries of anthropomorphic art (and yes i am well aware of the larger representations). There does, to me, come a point where a person does not look, well, person shapes, anymore.
wow. i've digressed.
I don't pass judgement here (whatever you might construe), my parents are massively fattist which has contributed in no small part to my 8 year eating disorder (no defence i know). I just think that there is a difference between someone who is larger than society wants but who is totally healthy and happy, and a person who is much to large for their frame and physique to support.
and with the NHS we are supporting those who, like smokers, drinkers, reckless drivers, pot smokers, etc. are negatively affecting their health by their lifestyle.
ugh. i should stop. proceed with the flaming.
p.s.
The daily mail is a hateful hateful rag.
@thesciencegirl: k. read it that way. there isn't actually any hate here. sorry to disappoint. just observation of thousands of years of human beings. and noting that legs need to move in a certain way to propel the human being forward, and if there is flesh in the way of that movement (for example) then that is not "human shaped".
I do not even remotely attempt to engage with the HUGE variety of factors that affect the size and shape that a person is. whether you choose to believe it or not i feel no antipathy, resentment, or malice towards anybody because of their size or shape.
@DramaClub: I'm white, and I talk about race and racism with people of color all the time. I don't worry about appearing racist, because I know I'm not. I know that it's possible I may say something that I get called out on because I've failed to consider some aspect of the situation that isn't immediately apparent to me as a white person, but that's fine, that's how I learn.
In my experience, the only time people of color react negatively in such a discussion is when white people are defensive and respond with, "But I couldn't possibly be saying something that's racist!" Because that signals that it's not really a discussion, it's a lecture from white people to people of color that they're supposed to listen to but not respond to in any way; there's no good faith exchange of views. The only learning that's supposed to be going on is by the people of color -- should they try to teach the white person anything about what they world looks like from their perspective, the dialogue shuts down.
I simply don't understand how talking about racism could possibly, in and of itself, make someone appear racist.
@Rummy_McGin: Wow, then, there a lot of people who aren't what you would call "human shaped" based on being able to walk a certain way, but who still lead lives worth living, and have been for thousands and thousands of years, and we're not just talking weight here. "Human shaped" is whatever shape a person comes in; the fact that you have a specific shape in mind for what it means does not mean that those who do not fit your idea are not human shaped.
@Rummy_McGin: So, then. Amputees? Not 'human-shaped.' Birth defects? Not human-shaped. Turned ankle? Not human-shaped. Pregnant and waddling? Not human-shaped.
All these things would not be in line with 'legs need[ing] to move in a certain way.' The only thing that separates them from obesity is the perception that obesity is a 'choice' for which we can assert blame.
I don't know you, so I am not going to make assumptions about whether or not you 'hate' people like me. However, can you not see how "not human-shaped" becomes "not human" and becomes "not deserving of respect?" Even if you yourself have no "antipathy, resentment, or malice" you are still contributing to a culture that does.
@Rummy_McGin: No, you just consider yourself the arbiter of what is and isn't "human-shaped". By the way, in your milennia of observation of the human form, did this human shape ever crop up?
There's a lot of misdirected anger and hatred in her article... Makes me wonder why this is so personal to her. Perhaps she or some close family members have dealt with weight issues. (Or maybe she's just an asshole.)
Yeah, because every person who isn't a fatty must be a super health-nut, right? I work with models and actresses that are so skinny and most of the time they fall into two categories:
a) genetically blessed mutants who can (and do) eat anything and everything and rarely exercise.
b) adhering to incredibly unhealthy "activities" to maintain their size- drugs, extreme dieting, eating disorders.
It really frosts my cupcake that thin people get a free-pass when it comes to prejudice. It is also completely insensitive to the people who have a medical condition (because, you know, those things do exist) or those of us (myself included) who are trying to change our habits and maintain a healthier lifestyle.
It upsets me to no end the amount of insecurity that is placed on the shoulders of those of us that are trying to get healthier. Everybody likes to watch and make fun of the "fatties" no matter what. Human beings have this interesting paradox of wanting to be accepted and to exclude simultaneously.
I've heard stories of women running and exercising in graveyards or at odd hours of the day- because they don't want to get hassled. You can't imagine the looks I get, when I go out to eat with my best-friend (one of those previously mentioned genetic mutants).
In the grand scheme of sizes, I'm not even that big (I'm a 14) compared to the national average.
Note to Platell- you catch more flies with honey, than you do with vinegar. Don't complain about a problem that doesn't concern or affect you, unless you've actually come up with a plan of action that is supportive, comprehensive and not based solely on the "otherness" of people who don't look like you.
@MissRose: Human beings have this interesting paradox of wanting to be accepted and to exclude simultaneously.
can we be friends? i like your style.
PS- be wary of posting number specific to size. samanthrax is somewhere busily updating her spreadsheet. ;-)
I can answer the end of this piece. Amanda Plattell is concerned with nothing more than the greater enrichment of Amanda Plattell.
She's an Australian hack for hire who will write anything for a buck and who has no real strong opinions on anything.
In contrast to MeMe Roth she almost certainly doesn't believe any of this but considers it 'good copy' in much the same way that she considers repeatedly attacking female celebrities in print 'good copy'.
Whether her complete amorality makes this piece worse I leave up to everyone else to decide.
08/10/09
But I did ask them directly what they felt about their size. Kayleigh described herself as 'plump' and said she did worry about the health issues surrounding being overweight, but felt there was no help for people like her.
...
She has a point there. West Bromwich boasts a vast new art centre called The Public that cost £65m to build and is universally despised.
The town could have had an Olympic-class sports centre for that kind of money. The locals would have settled for a half-decent swimming pool. ...
'We had a local pool but they closed it because people kept getting attacked at night,' says Kayleigh.
'Now there's nothing, nowhere to go, no parks, no pool.'...
West Brom may have no swimming pool, but it has fast food outlets galore...
You couldn't eat healthily in this town if you tried.
...
There's a historical factor, too, that I hadn't taken in.
'There's a culture of food that's regionally determined...This area was very industrial, where people worked extremely hard. Their jobs were really physical, so they could afford to eat a lot of fat-rich food and consume high levels of calories because they were burning it off.'
This 'food history' creates a habit that's hard to break..
Hey look, lady!You found some reasons that don't come loaded with a moral judgement! All that stuff at the front, after the bit about you being a fattist, of course, where you said that maybe you're missing something, there it is! A whole bunch of good solid reasons, from good solid investigative work, that point to something other than fat=lazy, stupid slob! Such a shame you couldn't see past your own preconcieved ideas of what lies at the core of the problem.
08/10/09
08/10/09
It'd be a lovely world indeed where we could all pluck fresh produce from trees and plants in our backyard, but it ain't the world we live in lady. So shut your damn pie hole and quit trying to mask your simple aesthetic disgust with some sort of global concern for health.
08/10/09
08/10/09
Also, the writer's issue is obviously not about health, as Sadie pointed out. It's about aesthetics and what kind of people this woman prefers to see occupying the space around her.
08/11/09
08/12/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
I've gotten flamed for dressing down some Mom online for feeding her 9 month old chocolate formula. Then there was the Mom that bragged about her 10 month old being able to scarf (her word, not mine) down an entire slice of pepperoni pizza. We're not talking the economically depressed here, we're taking about soccer Mom's that have full access to fruits/veggies.
Look don't get me wrong my kids get french fries etc. But not all the time and not at the expense of real food.
I hate the authors attitude here. I agree w/pp that Jamie Oliver does a muuuch better job.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
I'm not even sure what is being done about the real issues, if anything, because it's completely drowned out by the malignant shrieking of fatty-hating harpies.
...And whatever the male equivalent of harpies would be. (is there one?)
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
In the U.S., it's becoming a well-known fact that there is a direct relation between poverty and obesity, i.e. the least healthful of foods are also the least expensive, so people who have a limited income have a tendency to be overweight. Is it the same in the UK?
I'm well-read on food issues in the U.S. but I will admit that I've no idea what's going on in other countries.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
When I lived in the city with the far away whole foods, the only grocery store within walking distance of my apartment was catered to college students, was small and cramped, and had very limited produce. They were cheap, and they delivered, so I shopped there more often than not just because it was convenient. I bought a lot of forzen veggies (more expensive than fresh) and in season, I could supplement with purchases from the farmer's market, but that was only possible because my student schedule allowed me to be home in the middle of the day on a wednesday, when the farmer's market was open. If I had kids/multiple jobs/fewer friends with cars, all of my groceries would have come from the cheap, nearby store.
08/10/09
08/10/09
It is very difficult to talk about racism without appearing racist and it's equally difficult to talk about obesity without appearing fattist. How do we do this? I haven't been able to navigate the language in a way that doesn't upset someone.
08/10/09
I think that's entirely untrue unless you actually are racist or fattist.
08/10/09
It's easier to talk about these things with people who know you and know your heart; it's much more difficult to talk about them in a forum like this where you can't see where the writer is coming from.
08/10/09
1)having a fact based and empathetic civil discussion about race or weight and
2)having a generalization based and/or condescending/rife with privilege discussion about race or weight.
the latter would not only "appear" racist/fattist, that's simply what it would be.
civil discussions happen all the time here. perhaps DramaClub hasn't been here long enough to be aware of this?
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
I do agree with the majority of health professionals that there is a correlation (largely speaking) between obesity and ill health. I do have a gut -not rational or compassionate or reasonable or realistic - reaction that tells me that someone who has a roll of fat obscuring their groin, or wings of fat behind their shoulders, does not look the way a human being aught to look. based on centuries of anthropomorphic art (and yes i am well aware of the larger representations). There does, to me, come a point where a person does not look, well, person shapes, anymore.
wow. i've digressed.
I don't pass judgement here (whatever you might construe), my parents are massively fattist which has contributed in no small part to my 8 year eating disorder (no defence i know). I just think that there is a difference between someone who is larger than society wants but who is totally healthy and happy, and a person who is much to large for their frame and physique to support.
and with the NHS we are supporting those who, like smokers, drinkers, reckless drivers, pot smokers, etc. are negatively affecting their health by their lifestyle.
ugh. i should stop. proceed with the flaming.
p.s.
The daily mail is a hateful hateful rag.
08/10/09
08/10/09
I do not even remotely attempt to engage with the HUGE variety of factors that affect the size and shape that a person is. whether you choose to believe it or not i feel no antipathy, resentment, or malice towards anybody because of their size or shape.
08/10/09
In my experience, the only time people of color react negatively in such a discussion is when white people are defensive and respond with, "But I couldn't possibly be saying something that's racist!" Because that signals that it's not really a discussion, it's a lecture from white people to people of color that they're supposed to listen to but not respond to in any way; there's no good faith exchange of views. The only learning that's supposed to be going on is by the people of color -- should they try to teach the white person anything about what they world looks like from their perspective, the dialogue shuts down.
I simply don't understand how talking about racism could possibly, in and of itself, make someone appear racist.
08/10/09
08/10/09
All these things would not be in line with 'legs need[ing] to move in a certain way.' The only thing that separates them from obesity is the perception that obesity is a 'choice' for which we can assert blame.
I don't know you, so I am not going to make assumptions about whether or not you 'hate' people like me. However, can you not see how "not human-shaped" becomes "not human" and becomes "not deserving of respect?" Even if you yourself have no "antipathy, resentment, or malice" you are still contributing to a culture that does.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
a) genetically blessed mutants who can (and do) eat anything and everything and rarely exercise.
b) adhering to incredibly unhealthy "activities" to maintain their size- drugs, extreme dieting, eating disorders.
It really frosts my cupcake that thin people get a free-pass when it comes to prejudice. It is also completely insensitive to the people who have a medical condition (because, you know, those things do exist) or those of us (myself included) who are trying to change our habits and maintain a healthier lifestyle.
It upsets me to no end the amount of insecurity that is placed on the shoulders of those of us that are trying to get healthier. Everybody likes to watch and make fun of the "fatties" no matter what. Human beings have this interesting paradox of wanting to be accepted and to exclude simultaneously.
I've heard stories of women running and exercising in graveyards or at odd hours of the day- because they don't want to get hassled. You can't imagine the looks I get, when I go out to eat with my best-friend (one of those previously mentioned genetic mutants).
In the grand scheme of sizes, I'm not even that big (I'm a 14) compared to the national average.
Note to Platell- you catch more flies with honey, than you do with vinegar. Don't complain about a problem that doesn't concern or affect you, unless you've actually come up with a plan of action that is supportive, comprehensive and not based solely on the "otherness" of people who don't look like you.
08/10/09
can we be friends? i like your style.
PS- be wary of posting number specific to size. samanthrax is somewhere busily updating her spreadsheet. ;-)
08/10/09
She's an Australian hack for hire who will write anything for a buck and who has no real strong opinions on anything.
In contrast to MeMe Roth she almost certainly doesn't believe any of this but considers it 'good copy' in much the same way that she considers repeatedly attacking female celebrities in print 'good copy'.
Whether her complete amorality makes this piece worse I leave up to everyone else to decide.
08/10/09