medicalindustrialcomplex

posts about #medicalindustrialcomplex more →
Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

Maritsa
07/01/09

In reply to Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?
Also, this article only discusses the efficacy for women of "advanced maternal age" - 35 and up - and the one Swedish study only looked at women 38 and up. It doesn't discuss whether PGS is useful for couples with other reasons for infertility, like anovulation, uterine problems, or male factor infertility.
Reply

Maritsa was starred Maritsa was unstarred

morninggloria
07/01/09

In reply to Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?
Send all of the precious, precious non-viable embryos over to me. I'm knitting them all six celled onesies and readying the sliver sized cradles.
Reply

morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred

stacyinbean
07/01/09

In reply to Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?
Not listening... La, la, la, la... I've got two wee cousins coming in 6 weeks who are the result of in vitro! I'm almost positive they had this testing done.
Reply

stacyinbean was starred stacyinbean was unstarred

Maritsa
07/01/09

@stacyinbean: Mazel tov!
Reply

Maritsa was starred Maritsa was unstarred

BeckySharper
07/01/09

In reply to Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?
Is the PGS strictly to determine which embryos might be the most viable? Or does it also involve screening for potential abnormalities so that women are less likely to have a child with birth defects? Because if it's the latter, I would think women would still prefer it.
Reply

BeckySharper was starred BeckySharper was unstarred

Blueberry26
07/01/09

@BeckySharper: But if you're already having fertility problems and you only get this one chance to have kids because the procedure is so expensive, then a procedure that so markedly reduces the likelihood of success would seem to have more cost and than benefit, no?
Reply

Blueberry26 was starred Blueberry26 was unstarred

BeckySharper
07/01/09

@Blueberry26: That's how it seems to me, yeah. But I can certainly see women saying "I can't go through all this trouble and have a damaged child." So they'd be willing to accept a lower pregnancy rate in exchange for a near-guarantee that the fetus wouldn't have genetic abnormalities.
Reply

BeckySharper was starred BeckySharper was unstarred

Maritsa
07/01/09

@BeckySharper: The latter. Most people use it, as far as I know, to screen for disease or congenital defects.
Reply

Maritsa was starred Maritsa was unstarred

Maritsa
07/01/09

@Maritsa: Although in that case it's usually called PGD - preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

At any rate, my clinic only did this for screening for diseases. They never tried to sell it to me to increase my chances of success.
Reply

Maritsa was starred Maritsa was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#medicalindustrialcomplex

Jezebel

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel

Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment