So get with the program, people. Marilyn Monroe's size is so last month.

 Reply

But anyway, who really cares.

In reality I think peoples' bodies have changed, and most people have longer legs and less curves. I'm not one of them. :(

 Reply

Heck maybe the issue is more that women actually had good parts to choose from period.

 Reply

I honestly think a lot of people don't know that sizes have changed significantly. They probably just remember some of the more iconic photos of Monroe when she had a little more curve to her, and they think, "Wait, didn't she wear a size 16? Hey, wearing a size 16 can be really sexy! This is one tidbit of comfort that makes me feel better about having a higher number on the tag of my jeans."

This weird nitpicky nanometer-by-nanometer post about her EXACT! FUCKING! MEASUREMENTS is sort of...counterproductive, though, in two ways:

1. You guys were wrong, you wrongy wrongersons! You don't know ANYTHING about sizes, ha ha!

2. If you wear a larger size, you shouldn't get to compare yourself to someone who was considered beautiful, because THEY WERE NOTHING LIKE YOU! See? SEE? Chapter and verse! Here are the numbers, down to the nanometer!

Honestly, I find the weird fetishization of her exact measurements to be a little icky, because sheez, the poor lady didn't have a happy life and she had a tragic death. I think her memory deserves more respect than to reduce her to a collection of inches and inseams.

AGAIN, I am not saying that the editors or commenters are actually DOING this, but I could see where the discussion could get meaner, and I hope it doesn't.

 Reply

I'm all for combating misinformation, but if it makes people feel good to say "Hey, I wear size X and I'm similar to XYZ beautiful person, I feel better about myself," I don't think we should necessarily...chastise them for that. I have a very, very difficult relationship with my own body, and today's beauty standards are just so narrowly-defined and difficult to attain.

People probably find MM's appearance to be refreshing, and whether they know anything about vintage sizes or not, feel like they can use her "size" as a rallying cry for plus sized beauty. Even if MM didn't wear a size that would be considered "plus" today.

I think a better tactic would be to encourage people not to turn threads into size-weight-BMI comparisons, rather than saying, "Hey, you guys had her size all wrong all this time, you wrongy wrongers! Ha ha!" Because the former is useful and the latter is a little hurtful.

 Reply

I fear that Ellaesther's Law, freshly minted last week, may well still stand elsewhere in the world ("Ellaesther's Law: Any internet discussion of women's bodies will eventually lean on, and then devolve into furious argument over, Marilyn Monroe's body/dress size."), but perhaps we, here, will be able to get beyond it. Please God!

And not for nothing, but to echo hortense: The far more salient fact to remember from Marilyn Monroe's life is that it ended in tragedy. Poor woman -- we should let her rest in peace.

 Reply

Wh crs nywy?

thnk sh lkd grt - nd t 118-140 lbs. sh ws jst th rght wght fr 5'51/2' wmn. dn't cr wht th nrxcs sy!

 Reply