Junk food is subsidized by the government (well, the ingredients that make it so cheap). Healthy food is not. Disconnect, anyone??
I went to a fantastic panel on this once, and just for example a lady from the local food bank said that to change the peanut butter they put in the food boxes from high-sugar-bad-for-you-peanut-butter to natural peanut butter would cost $300,000. There's something very wrong with that.
There's no income tax in South Dakota, and it contains some of the very, very poorest areas of the US - the Pine Ridge reservation has some of the lowest average incomes in the entire country.
The folks that live there don't have much hope of improving their situation without massive statewide investment in the infrastructure, education, and social programs in the area. Unfortunately, the "haves" in South Dakota tend to be the farmer/rancher types who believe in the whole "PULL YOURSELVES UP BY YOUR BOOTSTRAPS" God-and-country type, who are convinced that social services are for ungrateful welfare queens. They will clamor the loudest against any increase in taxes, because they honestly don't have much exposure to people who are not Just Like Them.
Are the people in Pine Ridge stupid? No. Given half a chance and an incentive to try, they'd probably want to improve their situation just as much as you or I. They're just poor and stuck there. Are the farmers/ranchers stupid? No, they just live in the middle of nowhere and they live in a cultural environment that discourages social liberalism. My dad can't leave his ranch to see how "enlightened" his librul NJ daughter is, because he has to tend to the damn thing 24/7. I'm the first person in my family to vote Democrat since...God knows how long.
I honestly believe that most people don't WANT to continue to live in ignorance and poverty. But there are people who are socialized to believe that higher education, libraries, and social services are for wimps. Grandma and Grandpa and mom and dad and their teachers and their friends told them so, and they don't have much contact with anyone else. I think we need to figure out ways to challenge these perceptions without alienating people.
I don't think that the average person, even if they're in a very poor rural environment, is "stupid". I think that most people, given a chance and a reason to try, will want to do what's best for their own betterment and the betterment of their families. The problem is, how do we give these folks a chance and a reason to try? I don't know any of the answers.
@tscheese: Have you read "What's the Matter with Kansas"? He articulates the same argument you did, that people are conditioned by tradition, the media, politicians and their social circles to believe that liberals are just out to get their hands on their hard-earned money to give it to abortionists, the lazy poor and various other groups that don't deserve it. So people, no matter how poor or in need, will actively vote against their economic self-interest because they have been taught to distrust government (except when it's a "conservative" government because they'll leave it all to the free market).
Anyway, I thought your points were very well made and much more elegant than my attempts. I live in the South, among people taught to believe this - and I live in a college town! It takes a crisis for people to realize the boundaries of economic growth will be delineated by how we approach poverty and education for all.
Yup. Down in Texas, the places where people wouldn't dream of going anywhere without their SUV and air conditioning (Houston and DFW, I'm mainly looking at you, with a little bit of Corpus Christi on the side) help balance out Austin's considerable outdoorsy/biking population.
I promise, A/C folks, if you get out of the car, walk a bit and bring some cool water with you, after a while you start getting used to heat and humidity and realize that sweating is something that your body is supposed to do and isn't bad, and a crazy thing happens - your body starts adjusting to the weather! Just be sure to shower afterward.
(I'm pretty well adjusted at this point. Our air con at the house went out a couple weeks back, and we got some fans going, kept the shade constant, and it felt tolerable enough to sleep in the house. Only once the repair man got there did we find out that it was actually 93 degrees inside the house. I would have pinned it at low-80s, tops.)
@wednesdayam: I'm not sure where you live, but try not to forget that TX is a big state. For us (Abilene area, more or less) an hour and a half is a "short drive" somewhere. For heaven's sake, I grocery shop 30 miles from my home. That's a heckuva trek, unless I'm to buy all of my groceries at the local Allsups, or feed my family the ubiquitous DQ every night. ;)
@Ailanthus-altissima: I'm from the South, and I love the South, though I'm sort of happy not to live in South Carolina anymore. But there are many, many Southern cities I would happily live in.
@Ailanthus-altissima: I don't know if like the South, but I am quite interested in finding out!
Perhaps it comes from wanderlust and too much Patsy Cline, Old Crow Medicine Show, and blues, but I want to know if there are some interesting cultural bits still remaining. I hear there are...
I hear good things about Ashville, NC (and little Pittsboro), not sure where else is good.
Honestly, even if some of the crazy stereotypes are true, I just want to go South, because I bet it will feel different from where I am. (And if I don't like it, I'll just give in and embrace my Montana urges.)
@Stagtasticfantastic: It's really, really worth visiting. Start in Louisville or Lexington to get some horse-country, drive down to Nashville, go through the Carolinas and into Georgia (Savannah is one of the most beautiful places in the US). Hop across to Alabama (Birmingham, Montgomery) and into Jackson MS. Don't forget Arkansas, and then you've done the whole loop!
I want to go the every state in the US eventually.
Surprise: living off of whatever groceries you can get for $20 is bad for you.
I lost several inches of waistline when my income increased by 18%. Why? Because I could afford all the salad and fresh berries I could cram in my face, and stopped having to live off of peanut butter and wonderbread. Boxes of pasta were 4/$1 when I grew up (now they're $1 each on sale) but a head of lettuce is $1.99 and doesn't fill you up. And that's if you're living near a supermarket where they're sold. (I had to go dozens of blocks out of my way -- on foot and with public transit -- to get halfway affordable produce when I lived in Manhattan.)
Everyone knows this. So why are we all still so surprised?
@Etoiles: I don't think people are surprised. I think people deliberately ignore it because if they faced the facts then they might have to DO SOMETHING about it.
I wonder if there is a similar correlation between the heaviest states and the states with the highest rural populations. when I lived in PA, I was definitely 20 lbs smaller than I am now in NC. I used to walk everywhere, I rode my bike wherever I couldn't walk to, I led a reasonable active lifestyle. now that I'm in NC, everything is so isolated outside the major cities (like Raleigh and Chapel Hill). I know that PA has rural areas as well, and that people who live in cities can also be obese, but I wonder if there is any connection between the amount of people who depend on cars to get anywhere and the amount of people who end up being obese. in the South, it's often too damn hot and disgusting to spend too much time outside, and perhaps that's a deterrent as well. but I definitely agree that poverty probably has a lot to do with it.
@andromache: Oddly enough, I got the most exercise when I lived in a small town in northern Idaho. I could walk to work (a mile each way) and traffic was light enough that I wasn't ever worried about being run over. Then I moved to Albuquerque, which is designed exclusively for cars, and promptly started driving a 1/2 mile to work out at the gym. Nearly being run over three times by people watching for other crazy drivers will do that to you.
@andromache: Absolutely there is. Rural areas have little to no public transportation, so if you can't walk to the subway or bus stop, you drive or you stay home. If you don't live in a city, you drive to your job, the store, your activities.
Rural areas also have much less diversity of food (and access to healthy food) so you tend to eat what grandma ate: fried food. The difference is that grandma probably had to walk and work with her hands much more, thereby getting lots of exercise whether it was too damn hot or not, while we sit by the AC or get in the car.
@Cole23: Yes, cornbread and fried okra are yummy in the extreme but try living on it every day! When I moved to the South I thought I had gone to food heaven but luckily I wised up and started eating just a bit more salad.
I'm from Ohio and now live in SC. I can easily understand SC, seeing as the native cuisine is not exactly...clean, but I was surprised my home state is up there too. Hearty Mid-Western food, I guess.
@scarletbegonia: I dunno, a lot of soul food is very vegetable and legume heavy. The problem is when things are fried, or when ham gets thrown into everything.
@NellMood: And ham or bacon is thrown into everything. I'd like to try some good soul food greens, but being vegetarian, I have never found any that I can eat.
@girlleastlikelyto: Yeah, it's tough- I'm a vegetarian, too. I think it depends on where you live. Charleston has some good vegetarian soul food. I also really want this cookbook: [www.amazon.com]
@Alys Brangwin knows who's bad: Hey, that's great! (And I'm glad I get email alerts, or I totally would have missed this.). Please feel free to PM me about any restaurant recommendations in Charleston- I can tell you where all the good veggie plates are.
See, from the Rockies, I can literally look down on every state on either side of the Continental Divide. BWAHAHA, WHO'S NON-OBESE NOW? COLORADO REPRESENT...
...Of course, when you toggle to the map showing childhood obesity, we don't rate nearly as well. This is in line with othe reports I've heard of CO having relatively healthy adults, and overweight children.
In short, Colorado is a state full of active, selfish bastard adults who plunk the kiddies in front of the TV to play video games while they go biking or rafting during the day. At least that's my amateur theory.
@PreposterousHypothesis: Regarding the child/adult dichotomy, my hypothesis is that there just happens to be a larger proportion of fit but childless adults, not that many parents are fit but their children are obese. The fact that there are a lot of professional athletes who live in CO to train probably skews the data, too. And, from what I can see, there also seems to be a lot of ridiculously fit empty-nesters. Far too may 50-somethings regularly leave me and my bf in the dust as we huff and puff up those mountain trails!
@tallgirl-in-heels: That's probably true; all the athletes training at altitude throw it off, as well as people who don't have children. I don't have stats on hand, but generally childless adulst/couples have more money, more time, and can therefore either afford healthier meals/gym memberships or have time to cook good meals, go hiking/biking/whatever.
@toastandlove: So we basically have a whole geographical area full of people too stupid to know what's best for them, and trying to screw everyone else over with their stupid voting patterns? Hm.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Not necessarily stupid, but I could make a case for people in rural areas possibly being ignorant.
Say you can't afford to go to college. You have never visited a city with population larger than 50,000. You don't have access to a large public library or social services. You may not have even finished high school.
Your parents, grandparents, cousins, etc all make a living in this rural area, where they've all been for decades (or even centuries.) If you even HAVE a computer, which you might not, you don't have high speed Internet access, because the only telecommunication lines are 80-year-old copper phone lines.
Where are you going to learn that there are better ways for treating your fellow human beings? Your family may be uneducated, but they probably have some pride in themselves. They may have started their own farming businesses, for instance, and believe strongly in social conservatism because they "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps."
Yes, people do have to make their own decisions to leave or stay in situations like that. And many people do leave very poor, rural areas and learn a lot about the world and come to view their fellow humans with compassion. It's possible, but it's not easy. The odds are stacked against you if you're from a rural area with little access to education or social services. If you were born into a rabidly Republican, ignorant environment, and you have pretty much no access, encouragement, or inclination to pursue other modes of thought, how are you going to start voting more progressively?? How are you going to start advocating social services and compassion?
I don't think the majority of people in these situations are intentionally "stupid". I think they're probably ignorant. It's been ingrained in them through their upbringing and socialization that liberal "fancy" whatever is to be avoided. Calling them "stupid" doesn't really help, and it's kind of reductive--it ignores the factors that are making them ignorant in the first place.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Oh! HAHAHAH! I love the joke about everyone in the the South or Middle America being fat and stupid, it's hilarious and SO ORIGINAL.
Oddly enough, we don't all like being lumped under the same ignorant and deliberately obtuse rock.
@schweppes: No joke, I know a lot of Wyomingites. They're the "Leave us the eff alone or we will shoot you" sort of Repubs. Not the "Adhere to Biblical literalism or we will shoot you" kind.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Why do you hate poor people? And fat people? And people from the South? And Dolly Parton? And Jesus? And colors that are neither green nor grey?
@tscheese: But aren't they the ones putting themselves in that position? I mean, I don't see them rallying for their taxes to be raised. I have to say it at least once a week, raise my taxes! It's NOT difficult to understand that taxes afford you better social programs, but it seems those people don't want that.
@Chamalla, now gainfully employed: Was I claiming they were all that way? Look at an election map. Look at an obesity map. Look at a poverty map. If you have a problem, go bitch at the numbers.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Whoa there. These are not the people who make the decisions. The wealthy evangelical Republicans are the ones trying to screw us. They just know how to spin it to win the vote of the the highly neglected, often under-educated, and mostly naive people in rural areas of the South. They are not stupid! People fear what they don't understand. Someone living in a holler (I can use this term because I've lived in one) can go through life with no access to diversity and so they take the word of the fear-mongering right wing. Which brings me to a whole other issue of the need to bring in volunteer groups to cultivate the communities and economies of these areas--which can include healthy eating habits, as well. I could go on and on about this but I don't want to threadjack.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Wait, what? You think we should have higher federal taxes than you? That's the only way to even it out, yk - because my state sales tax, in lieu of state income tax doesn't touch you one way or another. It goes to my state's coffers, the exact same way that your state income tax would.
Also, do you own a home? If not, why the fuck aren't you buying one so YOU can pay property taxes, hmm?
@daftfad: The wealthy evangelical Republicans live in Colorado Springs, CO. Colorado, due to Denver, is a "purple" state, and the "healthiest" state on this map. So they're keeping themselves in good health for cultural domination purposes.
@labeled: I think she was talking about state taxes. Southern Republican states have very low state tax burdens per capita (and, yes, it doesn't matter whether your state tax is assessed on income or sales). Those same states have a lot of public health/education/etc problems (as the map above, and many others, demonstrate). One way to solve public problems is through increased government assistance, which is quite hard to do when you're paying so little in state tax.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Who's gonna tell them that they should pursue better social services in their cash-strapped locales that have largely failed them? Where are they gonna get the idea? Who's going to tell them that life could be better? How do you tax a population that's lingering near the poverty line?
They may not have computers or reliable Internet connections. They have a deep distrust of liberal thought because their moms and dads and grandparents were the same way. I don't think this is a question of "OH hee hee look at the stupids THEY'RE TOO STUPID." I think there are a lot of people living in difficult situations, without access to information or education--and how are you going to implement those services for them if they're barely above the poverty line? Even if they wanted to pay for fiberoptic internet connections and fantastic libraries and the best schools, the money simply isn't there.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): People do want better social programs but if you are not well educated or exposed to diversity of thought or race or experience, you don't necessarily make the connection that those taxes go to your benefit too. You can be easily led to believe that only the lazy or evil will use tax dollars to fund a lifestyle they didn't earn.
Really, it is easy to be manipulated into thinking the government is just out to steal your money to give it to the undeserving poor, so by god, don't raise my taxes. It takes a few more steps to realize you use those tax dollars too. And a lot of people don't have the time, inclination, education or whatever to take those extra steps. Wasn't Thomas Frank's "What's the Matter with Kansas" all about people voting against their own economic self-interest because they were easily led by political interests?
In the South, too, issues of poverty and justice are linked to religion. And it is easy for those in public office to manipulate people that way. I think a lot of people down here read the Old Testament a whole lot more than they do the New. They tend to forget Jesus didn't hang out with the rich people, he hung with the criminals and poor and sick.
@greengrey (raidersofthelostSTAR): Perhaps I misread "whole geographical area full of people too stupid to know what's good for them" in a thread about obesity rates? Because my reading comprehension skills are usually pretty on...
I've looked at plenty of maps, not one of them said republican = stupid, obese = stupid or poor = stupid.
I wasn't the one who pointed out the poverty/obesity correlation, I did however wonder why the states that are poor/obese vote republican. If your poor and voting republican, then yeah, you don't know what you're doing.
RUR ROH. DOES TEH BIG BAD ALABAMIAN IN THE ROOM REALLY HAVE TO STEP IN AND MAKE AN APPEAL GREENGREY?
i can, will, and often do sniff out the "southern generalization pretension" in these threads, as i live here in the asshole of the south, but really i don't think greengrey meant anything offensive by her question. somehow i can't help but think that a lot of folks read her comments in a skewed manner and always end up putting words in her mouth that she just didn't say.
all in all, this sparked a fairly good conversation though.
i think we can all agree that the south is a place like no other, that's for sure.
07/02/09
I went to a fantastic panel on this once, and just for example a lady from the local food bank said that to change the peanut butter they put in the food boxes from high-sugar-bad-for-you-peanut-butter to natural peanut butter would cost $300,000. There's something very wrong with that.
07/02/09
07/02/09
The folks that live there don't have much hope of improving their situation without massive statewide investment in the infrastructure, education, and social programs in the area. Unfortunately, the "haves" in South Dakota tend to be the farmer/rancher types who believe in the whole "PULL YOURSELVES UP BY YOUR BOOTSTRAPS" God-and-country type, who are convinced that social services are for ungrateful welfare queens. They will clamor the loudest against any increase in taxes, because they honestly don't have much exposure to people who are not Just Like Them.
Are the people in Pine Ridge stupid? No. Given half a chance and an incentive to try, they'd probably want to improve their situation just as much as you or I. They're just poor and stuck there. Are the farmers/ranchers stupid? No, they just live in the middle of nowhere and they live in a cultural environment that discourages social liberalism. My dad can't leave his ranch to see how "enlightened" his librul NJ daughter is, because he has to tend to the damn thing 24/7. I'm the first person in my family to vote Democrat since...God knows how long.
I honestly believe that most people don't WANT to continue to live in ignorance and poverty. But there are people who are socialized to believe that higher education, libraries, and social services are for wimps. Grandma and Grandpa and mom and dad and their teachers and their friends told them so, and they don't have much contact with anyone else. I think we need to figure out ways to challenge these perceptions without alienating people.
I don't think that the average person, even if they're in a very poor rural environment, is "stupid". I think that most people, given a chance and a reason to try, will want to do what's best for their own betterment and the betterment of their families. The problem is, how do we give these folks a chance and a reason to try? I don't know any of the answers.
07/02/09
Anyway, I thought your points were very well made and much more elegant than my attempts. I live in the South, among people taught to believe this - and I live in a college town! It takes a crisis for people to realize the boundaries of economic growth will be delineated by how we approach poverty and education for all.
07/02/09
I promise, A/C folks, if you get out of the car, walk a bit and bring some cool water with you, after a while you start getting used to heat and humidity and realize that sweating is something that your body is supposed to do and isn't bad, and a crazy thing happens - your body starts adjusting to the weather! Just be sure to shower afterward.
(I'm pretty well adjusted at this point. Our air con at the house went out a couple weeks back, and we got some fans going, kept the shade constant, and it felt tolerable enough to sleep in the house. Only once the repair man got there did we find out that it was actually 93 degrees inside the house. I would have pinned it at low-80s, tops.)
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
Perhaps it comes from wanderlust and too much Patsy Cline, Old Crow Medicine Show, and blues, but I want to know if there are some interesting cultural bits still remaining. I hear there are...
I hear good things about Ashville, NC (and little Pittsboro), not sure where else is good.
Honestly, even if some of the crazy stereotypes are true, I just want to go South, because I bet it will feel different from where I am. (And if I don't like it, I'll just give in and embrace my Montana urges.)
07/02/09
I want to go the every state in the US eventually.
07/31/09
07/02/09
I lost several inches of waistline when my income increased by 18%. Why? Because I could afford all the salad and fresh berries I could cram in my face, and stopped having to live off of peanut butter and wonderbread. Boxes of pasta were 4/$1 when I grew up (now they're $1 each on sale) but a head of lettuce is $1.99 and doesn't fill you up. And that's if you're living near a supermarket where they're sold. (I had to go dozens of blocks out of my way -- on foot and with public transit -- to get halfway affordable produce when I lived in Manhattan.)
Everyone knows this. So why are we all still so surprised?
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
Rural areas also have much less diversity of food (and access to healthy food) so you tend to eat what grandma ate: fried food. The difference is that grandma probably had to walk and work with her hands much more, thereby getting lots of exercise whether it was too damn hot or not, while we sit by the AC or get in the car.
@Cole23: Yes, cornbread and fried okra are yummy in the extreme but try living on it every day! When I moved to the South I thought I had gone to food heaven but luckily I wised up and started eating just a bit more salad.
07/02/09
Now obesity is bad, is that what we're saying? I thought it was, yk, all about the fucked up BMI and about HEALTH, not WEIGHT.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
...Of course, when you toggle to the map showing childhood obesity, we don't rate nearly as well. This is in line with othe reports I've heard of CO having relatively healthy adults, and overweight children.
In short, Colorado is a state full of active, selfish bastard adults who plunk the kiddies in front of the TV to play video games while they go biking or rafting during the day. At least that's my amateur theory.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
@toastandlove: So we basically have a whole geographical area full of people too stupid to know what's best for them, and trying to screw everyone else over with their stupid voting patterns? Hm.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
Say you can't afford to go to college. You have never visited a city with population larger than 50,000. You don't have access to a large public library or social services. You may not have even finished high school.
Your parents, grandparents, cousins, etc all make a living in this rural area, where they've all been for decades (or even centuries.) If you even HAVE a computer, which you might not, you don't have high speed Internet access, because the only telecommunication lines are 80-year-old copper phone lines.
Where are you going to learn that there are better ways for treating your fellow human beings? Your family may be uneducated, but they probably have some pride in themselves. They may have started their own farming businesses, for instance, and believe strongly in social conservatism because they "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps."
Yes, people do have to make their own decisions to leave or stay in situations like that. And many people do leave very poor, rural areas and learn a lot about the world and come to view their fellow humans with compassion. It's possible, but it's not easy. The odds are stacked against you if you're from a rural area with little access to education or social services. If you were born into a rabidly Republican, ignorant environment, and you have pretty much no access, encouragement, or inclination to pursue other modes of thought, how are you going to start voting more progressively?? How are you going to start advocating social services and compassion?
I don't think the majority of people in these situations are intentionally "stupid". I think they're probably ignorant. It's been ingrained in them through their upbringing and socialization that liberal "fancy" whatever is to be avoided. Calling them "stupid" doesn't really help, and it's kind of reductive--it ignores the factors that are making them ignorant in the first place.
07/02/09
Oddly enough, we don't all like being lumped under the same ignorant and deliberately obtuse rock.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
@Chamalla, now gainfully employed: Was I claiming they were all that way? Look at an election map. Look at an obesity map. Look at a poverty map. If you have a problem, go bitch at the numbers.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
Also, do you own a home? If not, why the fuck aren't you buying one so YOU can pay property taxes, hmm?
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
They may not have computers or reliable Internet connections. They have a deep distrust of liberal thought because their moms and dads and grandparents were the same way. I don't think this is a question of "OH hee hee look at the stupids THEY'RE TOO STUPID." I think there are a lot of people living in difficult situations, without access to information or education--and how are you going to implement those services for them if they're barely above the poverty line? Even if they wanted to pay for fiberoptic internet connections and fantastic libraries and the best schools, the money simply isn't there.
07/02/09
Really, it is easy to be manipulated into thinking the government is just out to steal your money to give it to the undeserving poor, so by god, don't raise my taxes. It takes a few more steps to realize you use those tax dollars too. And a lot of people don't have the time, inclination, education or whatever to take those extra steps. Wasn't Thomas Frank's "What's the Matter with Kansas" all about people voting against their own economic self-interest because they were easily led by political interests?
In the South, too, issues of poverty and justice are linked to religion. And it is easy for those in public office to manipulate people that way. I think a lot of people down here read the Old Testament a whole lot more than they do the New. They tend to forget Jesus didn't hang out with the rich people, he hung with the criminals and poor and sick.
07/02/09
I've looked at plenty of maps, not one of them said republican = stupid, obese = stupid or poor = stupid.
07/02/09
07/02/09
I wasn't the one who pointed out the poverty/obesity correlation, I did however wonder why the states that are poor/obese vote republican. If your poor and voting republican, then yeah, you don't know what you're doing.
07/02/09
i can, will, and often do sniff out the "southern generalization pretension" in these threads, as i live here in the asshole of the south, but really i don't think greengrey meant anything offensive by her question. somehow i can't help but think that a lot of folks read her comments in a skewed manner and always end up putting words in her mouth that she just didn't say.
all in all, this sparked a fairly good conversation though.
i think we can all agree that the south is a place like no other, that's for sure.