Enter your username and password.
New York, 2:51 PM
Sat Nov 14
56 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
tips@jezebel.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
Email | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
Email | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
Email | Twitter
Sadie Stein
Email | Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
Email
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
Email | Twitter
Contributors:
Jenna Sauers
Email
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Lizzie Skurnick
Email
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/13/09
The reason those plot points seem similar is that they're logical narrative trajectories for both. I somehow doubt S, C, D, and P are going to get re-absorbed. I don't think Mad Men relies on keeping the cast together in the same way The Office does, either. #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
I loved the pioneer spirit of all the new peeps in their office/hotel room! And I totally predicted that Joan would come in and whip that shit into shape. #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Break up Jim and Pam! Save The Office! #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
What do you want, their left arm or something? #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Mine depicted a lonely sailboat and we managed to scrape it off that wall.
Shut up, The Office. #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
I honestly don't think they're boring. I think we're too used to soap operatic relationships in these types of shows. So the expectations need to adjust. I mean, it's fine if you don't like it, but I don't think people getting together and staying together is inherently boring. I'm relieved, honestly. I find will they won't they stuff really boring once you go past 3 years.
My only real gripe with the show is that we need a direction for some of the characters. Jim is weirdly inept at being a manager, and while I'm all for showing character flaws, he's doing things that don't hold up to past development.
11/13/09
Well...there was the long distance thing while Pam was in school. There's been the job stuff. Pam's folks splitting up. A pregnancy. And the wedding which didn't exactly go as planned.
Sure, some of the other stuff is silly...but that's kind of the show. It's always been like that.
And the house thing, well, first time home buying can be weird. I don't know that personally, but friends have gone through stuff way weirder than the clown painting. #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
11/13/09
Yeah, I know, I think we've discussed the house thing before. :} And I would've liked more there, even if it was just Pam saying she loved it, or showing her using the studio, or whatever.
I do think they've done things and then dropped the thread more than they used to. Most of the stuff that's left dangling is for other characters, Jim and Pam seem to deal with their stuff, which is fine. We just don't see as much of them as we used to. Which is partly due to relationship evolution, but also I think a lack of focus in other storylines.
To be honest, I'm not especially thrilled with the Jim-is-incompetent thing they've got going. I don't need to see him act like Michael, only in a Jim way. Jim's character has needed some forward momentum for awhile now, but this particular choice just seems out of character to me. Kind of like how bizarrely out of character Pam was in that chair episode. I have no problem with characters evolving, or even being unlikable or having unlikable sides to them...but it shouldn't seem like it's an entirely different person all of a sudden. #madmenandtheoffice
11/13/09
There really is no way to tell what sort of human she would have become under different circumstances – but then is there ever? For all I know Betty would be just as boring in modern times, but last time I checked I didn't believe in feminism for some, or feminism for the nice, or feminism for friends only. #madmen
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
I read the Jones v. Clinton case in full (they made us when we took torts). Just because you're smarter at how you take advantage of your position*, doesn't mean your personal treatment of some women wasn't pretty skeezy. It just means we were aware of it.
*If you've never read it, he pulled it out while in a room with her and suggested she kiss it." When she turned him down he assured her he didn't want her to do anything she wasn't comfortable with. (Before telling her he'd help her out of she got trouble for not being at work and more or less told her to keep her mouth shut.)
On one hand, the way he phrased it was so ridiculous is comical. On another hand, its a horrible thing to do to someone. And with a history like that, its kind of hard to take his statements seriously.
(Oh and if you're curious? The complaint in Jones v. Clinton is here - [www.scottpcook.com]
The facts were reaffirmed in the district court case I read in full.)
11/12/09
11/12/09
Well, isn't that one for the Selective Memory World Record book? #billclinton
11/12/09