I can see how sexism, chauvanism, and "gender roles" are largely about earning power, not just gender; Karen Karbo loses me after this. Especially the part where she's the lady, so she gets the house and alimony and child support (natch), nevermind that her husband was the one who removed himself from the workforce in order to raise their children.
If she really wants someone who will treat her as a complete equal, maybe that is something she should consider before marrying her next husband?
@Lawyerette will perform legal services for food: I think part of the problem was he really wasn't raising the kids, he was just hanging out. But depending on how long it lasted, I might be able to see the argument for him getting the house, The fact that he asked for child support was really crazy though, he had two kids, she had one, no kids together. She should support his children with another woman?
Given that I'm a librarian, it is highly unlikely that hypothetical husband would earn less than me, especially in New York (and there's no way in hell Theoretical Tony and I could live on my salary alone) but if he did, I would expect him to contribute both a proportional amount of money towards expenses, INCLUDING rent, and contribute a proportional amount of time towards housework and errands - I don't always want to be doing the dishes, schlepping to the laudromat, and cooking dinner, dammit.
Honestly, I have been fantasizing lately about having a partner. But it's not about being taken care of, for me, it's about having someone to help and depend on sometimes.
I make about twice as much money as my husband, and I like it that way. He is naturally frugal, but he doesn't say anything about my shopping habits because I bring home most of the money. Of course, this would be different if we as a couple didn't live below our collective means. I am sure that this makes me sound terrible, but it's true.
@chiken: @Rooo sez BISH PLZ: I agree, it appears you are in a situation where you and your husband both work, you shop but are not extravagant. Unless the situation is that your husband cant buy things he wants while you spend all the money (because its yours), and that doesnt appear to be the case, it appear you're in a healthy situation.
I actually agree with her. It *is* more fun to date a man than to marry him.
Maybe that's a reality only those of us who have been married and divorced see (or appreciate), but it's there.
Dating instead of marrying means you get the fun and frolic without having to do his laundry or put the seat down. You get nights out and morning snuggles but when you don't feel like looking at him for a couple of days, you don't have to see him.
For some of those of us who have already done the marriage/raising kids thing, it makes for a much easier, happier life.
@MJ: You make a good point. Many Jezebel readers are aware of the surveys that show married men and unmarried women report higher levels of happiness than unmarried men and married women. Marriage tends to benefit men more than women, so it makes sense that dating a guy would be more fun than marrying him.
@MJ: That certainly does not apply to every dating situation. I am dating a guy and we are certainly not talking marriage, but we are living together. I do occasionally have to put the seat down, and we haven't spent more then a night apart in the 6 months we have been dating. Id pretty much say that aside from the title there isn't much difference.
I think it's completely fair and understandable that a breadwinning woman with a partner would expect said partner to compensate for the financial inequality by taking care of something else. Playing video games and practicing guitar all day don't count. We woman have had our movement - to earn our own money in our own careers, but men have to expand their own roles if we are to ever reach equality.
This is a little off topic, but when I was a nosy preteen, I found a letter my dad had written my mom saying, basically, thank you for giving everything up to stay at home and raise our daughter. My dad was obviously the breadwinner and it was such an amazing surprise for me to realize how sensitive he was to the roles in their marriage.
"the house that was purchased with my money, in my name". I always wondered if in our journey toward recognized equality with men, we wouldn't run the risk of falling into the same jerky behavior and thought patterns. If she were a dude she'd be a pig.
I think that the issue with this SHOULD be: Where are the guys who are NOT deadbeats or mysogynist pigs? I do have to echo the sentiment that it seems like a lot of guys are unable to take care of themselves it seems... what's up with that?
@happysquid: I was discussing this with my mother recently, because several of my uncles have found themselves suddenly unemployed or chose to become unemployed in this economy and are not out right now looking for new jobs. And I said, we spend so much time trying to dissolve the stereotypes, and saying that there's about the same amount of crazy and stupid and irresponsible in both genders, we just don't tend to date enough of both genders to know that and think it's just a "guy thing." But dammit, why is it always men? When it comes to being lazy about their own lives and taking care of their families, why are the stories only about men?
The lesson I learned from my ex is that I want a partner. A male partner, yes, but someone able to take care of himself and potential children. They do exist. I've seen them (with their wives and children, not in the wild). I had to take care of my ex and it was assumed when we had children that he would just be another big child for me to take care of. And at the time I was okay with that, but now I understand that a guy who feels that way also feels no responsibility to stay with you because he always thinks he can get someone else to take care of him and I will never put myself in that position again. And now I have been single for a very, very long time.
I think this just goes to show how essential it is for people to discuss in depth their expectations for married life BEFORE there is a ring involved. My boyfriend and I are no where near getting engaged, but we have set up the fact that he wants to be a surgeon, and with that kind of time commitment put into a job, if we get married and have children I would work from home (I want to write cookbooks anyway, not exactly a breadwinner career unless you are Martha Stewart.)
My mom always complained growing up about having to be the breadwinner while my dad was in law school (and later when he became ill)- I think they probably never talked about their roles in the relationship before their marriage. (Like the financial repercussions of my father paying child support etc. to his first wife)
Y'know, as infuriating as it may be, that is actually the self-described point of Modern Love -- for individuals to explore/document their personal experiences, with the idea that elements contained therein will resonate on a larger scale. That's what the editors look for (read the submission guidelines -- they're illuminating), and that's what they get. I understand that everyone finds the people profiled in Modern Love to be really irritating, but I'm seriously baffled by Jezebel's weekly practice of calling the authors on the carpet and pointing fingers and deeming them narcissistic/entitled/materialistic/whatever. They're writing a specific type of piece, for which (like it or not) there is a market of avid readers. There are plenty of other forums for personal essays, even within the NYT, that contain the sort of critical exploration/self-examination Sadie criticizes ML for lacking. Modern Love is fluff; and more importantly, fluff what it's meant to be. The weekly ranting against it just seems as bizarre as watching South Park every week just to lamenting the lousy animation.
Aren't you the commenter who defended that author who let her overweight son eat as much as he wanted but heckled and harassed her overweight daughter about her weight last year, with no justification whatsoever for her behavior? Wasn't that you?
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: I think that's a very oversimplified (and determinedly shit-starting) characterization of what I said, but yes. I remember you being unnecessarily unpleasant to me then, too.
My mom went to Radcliffe in 1969, worked for feminist org.s and publications, got married at 20, had me and my siblings, divorced my dad in the early 90s, and now can't quite take care of herself but gets along relatively OK.
Last year I had this totally weird discussion with her that made me realize she thinks I'm going to get married to someone and let him support me financially. Every feminist instinct I have came from my mom, but deep down I think she expects me to be a traditional wife. Has anyone else had an experience like this? Realizing their mom (or whoever) has a totally different understanding of female independence than you thought they did?
@SarahMcL: Yeah, totally. My mom rationalizes my fiances flightiness as the nervousness that a man feels as he realizes that responsibility that comes with supporting a family, and the weight of that burden. I'm like, well, Mom, you haven't really gotten acquainted with the extended adolescence that my generation's males seem to believe is their birthright. Me, on the other hand, I am fully, totally aware of the burden of responsibility (financial, emotional, physical, mental, emotional) that comes with raising a family, while my fiance still seems blissfully and rather willfully unaware...
@SarahMcL: A totally different understanding, of the concept, of its relationship to what you thought she taught you, of its relationship to what has happened to her as a result of her choices ... you have no idea.
@exelizabeth: "Mom, you haven't really gotten acquainted with the extended adolescence that my generation's males seem to believe is their birthright."
SO. MUCH. WORD.
What can I bribe you with to come talk with my mother, godmother, aunts, and assorted elder female friends of the family who seem to be commmitted -- with a vengeance -- to Just Not Getting It??
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: That's exactly right - what I thought she taught me! I can't even imagine how confusing and complicated life must have been for her, wanting to be simultaneously DEpendent and INdependent. At least I don't feel pulled in two directions... and I have her to thank for it! Generation gaps, you kill me.
I'm the breadwinner in my family, and have been for 10 of the 12 years we've been together. It's due to legal and personal problems, and we stay together because we really are madly in love. But the lack of a second income SUCKS. And once when we were joking about getting divorced he said I'd have to pay him alimony, and I felt pure outrage because him not having a job, and me earning all the money, was not a choice we agreed on. It's just happened, and hasn't been fixed yet. And I feel he owes me 10 years of financial support, not the reverse!
Luckily we're not likely to get divorced, so the alimony situation won't arise.
But surely I wouldn't owe him if we did get divorced???!!!
I experienced life as a pampered princess. It was called being raised by my parents. As a result, I am skeptical of anyone who wants to give me lots of things, for fear I'm going to hear, "I spent ALL THAT money on you! You have to do everything I say!"
@clairedeloony: Hello, overdue insight -- this is probably why I have issues with being "taken care of" by anyone as an adult! I'd rather take care of myself and not have to worry about anyone feeling like I "owe" them something.
@Kivrin: In my experience that feeling of owing someone something is so subtle and insidious (even when its innocent) that I give myself shitting kittens anuerysms given my need to please and make sure the boat is steady. Do not want. REALLY do not want in a romantic relationship. I would love the odd gift and so on, but I'd also like to buy my dude the odd gift, because I'm a super earner lady who can.
There are so many things wrong with this that I don't even know where to start. The idea that women should expect to be "taken care of"? Lamenting having to support a family, which men in single-earning families have had to do for generations? Expecting your divorce to be the same as those in the movies, even though you're the primary earner? Suggesting that a longer marriage is the ideal, even if one party is unhappy but lacks the means to leave?
12/15/08
But we haven't.
12/15/08
I can see how sexism, chauvanism, and "gender roles" are largely about earning power, not just gender; Karen Karbo loses me after this. Especially the part where she's the lady, so she gets the house and alimony and child support (natch), nevermind that her husband was the one who removed himself from the workforce in order to raise their children.
If she really wants someone who will treat her as a complete equal, maybe that is something she should consider before marrying her next husband?
12/15/08
12/15/08
Honestly, I have been fantasizing lately about having a partner. But it's not about being taken care of, for me, it's about having someone to help and depend on sometimes.
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
Maybe that's a reality only those of us who have been married and divorced see (or appreciate), but it's there.
Dating instead of marrying means you get the fun and frolic without having to do his laundry or put the seat down. You get nights out and morning snuggles but when you don't feel like looking at him for a couple of days, you don't have to see him.
For some of those of us who have already done the marriage/raising kids thing, it makes for a much easier, happier life.
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
i understand where the author is coming from, but how she words it is more than a little awful.
12/15/08
12/15/08
The lesson I learned from my ex is that I want a partner. A male partner, yes, but someone able to take care of himself and potential children. They do exist. I've seen them (with their wives and children, not in the wild). I had to take care of my ex and it was assumed when we had children that he would just be another big child for me to take care of. And at the time I was okay with that, but now I understand that a guy who feels that way also feels no responsibility to stay with you because he always thinks he can get someone else to take care of him and I will never put myself in that position again. And now I have been single for a very, very long time.
12/15/08
My mom always complained growing up about having to be the breadwinner while my dad was in law school (and later when he became ill)- I think they probably never talked about their roles in the relationship before their marriage. (Like the financial repercussions of my father paying child support etc. to his first wife)
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
Aren't you the commenter who defended that author who let her overweight son eat as much as he wanted but heckled and harassed her overweight daughter about her weight last year, with no justification whatsoever for her behavior? Wasn't that you?
12/15/08
12/15/08
*headshake* So much to read into three innocent sentences.
And clearly you left a lasting impression just as charming as you are now - and not just on me, as I recall.
12/15/08
Last year I had this totally weird discussion with her that made me realize she thinks I'm going to get married to someone and let him support me financially. Every feminist instinct I have came from my mom, but deep down I think she expects me to be a traditional wife. Has anyone else had an experience like this? Realizing their mom (or whoever) has a totally different understanding of female independence than you thought they did?
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
SO. MUCH. WORD.
What can I bribe you with to come talk with my mother, godmother, aunts, and assorted elder female friends of the family who seem to be commmitted -- with a vengeance -- to Just Not Getting It??
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
Luckily we're not likely to get divorced, so the alimony situation won't arise.
But surely I wouldn't owe him if we did get divorced???!!!
12/15/08
12/15/08
A good one.
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
12/15/08
Jesus.