It's kind of like how men are subject to The Female Gaze and held up to an unrealistic standard with all those suave, tall, buff, traveled, multi-lingual, fabulously wealthy and aristocratic but also able to beat down 5 other guys single handedly men in all those action movies, tv shows, romantic comedies, soap operas, women's magazines, and romance novels. I mean, obviously no real guy can meet that standard, so of course we have no choice but to go around constantly feeling insecure and paranoid that we're going to be replaced, asserting ourselves in power struggles, throwing tantrums when our girlfriends look at other guys, telling women how shallow and disgusting they are to want a guy who makes money like Steve Jobs and looks like Brad Pitt, and requiring our partners to reassure us 24/7 that we're special, that they'll never leave us, and that we're just as hot as Brad Pitt and just as successful as Steve Jobs, preferably by buying us things as near to every day as possible.
Does the inanity of blaming women's insecurity on society and of vilifying men for finding hot young girls, uh, hot, sink in when you look at it that way?
@AlvinaJibroni: What on earth are you talking about? Do you really think that men are expected to be multilingual, wealthy cage fighters? Outside of James Bond (more of a hero to men than a romantic ideal for women)- who exactly fits that description?
The thing I really object to is the sexualization of girls while maintaining this crazy virginity fetish. Miley Cyrus is sexualized, but she isn't allowed to own her sexuality, and by being denied her sexuality she is being denied her humanity. I'm not saying adults should be allowed to take advantage of kids, but kids aren't innocent either. Maybe if they are allowed to acknowledge and safely explore their sexualities, they can be smarter about it.
I really have no problem with objectification or the Lolita fetish (In fact, I've only recently become comfortable with the fact that I do look very young and hey, why shouldn't I enjoy that?), but I do have a problem with society's fetishization (Sp?) of youth, virginity, and "innocence" all at once - it sends a confusing message to everyone.
And DUH, of course kids can't identify with older people - they're KIDS. When I was 18 I knew a hell of lot more than I do now (And well, maybe I was right) and the "old people" never "got it." Reaching a little, I think.
@HappyLand: I don't think that's reaching at all. It's one thing to be unable to relate to adults, but it's another thing to say you'd rather be dead than old. I doubt teenagers and kids have always said that.
Great post, sexualizing young girls is terribly harmful in a ton of ways and I find it quite sad that there are grown men here trying to justify it as mere biology.
I developed one of the most hyper sezualized traits in our culture as a young girl, at about 13. Really big boobs. The rest of my body was still rather child like and I was extremely childish myself (I still liked to play with Barbies, what can I say?), and found it very hard to deal with my new found and undesired attention. Seriously, the things I heard every single day were like nothing I hear now at age 20, men on the street telling me, a child, they wanted to suck my breasts and things of the like. I hated it with all my heart, I hated myself, I hated men. I walked with my head down and slouching. Then I fought back, I lost my temper and yelled at them on the street as soon as they said something. Then I went through the usual stages of the teenage years, only more cynical (still am, really), and often angry. I never got to be silly and boy crazy and I truly do blame these men's harassment for it. I'm over it now, but it's left its mark on me, and it seems to be getting worse for girls now.
I know some young girls seem to like the attention, but as older men you have to know it's just a game for them, they're testing boundaries, seeing what they can do, trying to develop a sexual identity, but developing a very strong sexual identity at a young age can prevent them developing a true identity outside their sexual selves. No girl should proudly identify herself as an object.
The older I get, the more I believe that men's alleged drive toward very young women is more to do with patriarchal conditioning than genetics. I've seen too many men who use fears of aging - very subtly - as tools to manipulate or degrade women, who use young women as trophies to prove how virile they are, and who reject women over 30 not because they're unattractive but because they're independent and smart.
I've noticed that the successful or fulfilled guys my age seem to connect with women our age. It's the guys who feel unaccomplished who seem to seek out very young women, and that speaks volumes to me.
Because honestly, to be a little cruel here, I've seen way more men go downhill looks-wise as early as their late 20's, whereas many women stay young-looking and conventionally pretty for a long time. I just turned 42 and I beat college boys off with a stick. I don't know any men my age who are being pursued by college girls. None. The whole "changed a 40 in for 2 20's ha ha" is just a myth men like to scare their wives with.
All of this is based on the idea that women should be so desperate for a man that they will fight each other for him while men can just wander around taking their pick.
That isn't true and it has never been true. 40 year old men are not routinely getting with 20 years. Yes, it happens, but it is a rarity. Dating at every age has its own challenges for both genders.
It really bothers me to see Jez posters in this thread reinforce the stereotype that male aging has no effect on their dating prospects.
Obviously we shouldn't turn children into sex symbols. But a 16 and 19 year old aren't children. They have agency, they're self-aware. You wouldn't stop a 16 year old from working or making life altering decisions about education or college or whatnot, so they can handle their sexuality. Maybe we should have a board that reviews the sexual content of ads broadcast to children, that might be a start, though.
I also find it funny that so many people here are criticising men's sexuality, which values youth in women. You wouldn't criticise a homosexual for not finding the opposite gender attractive, etc. But men's sexuality is apparently open for attack.
I don't look at an 18 year old and think, 'gee, I bet she's dumb and easy to control'. I think, 'Holy damn she is gorgeous.' Why does this effect fade with age? Why don't I or my friends find women in their thirties and forties as attractive? I don't know, honestly, but how can you criticise something we don't control?
Obviously, I'd prefer to date someone in my age range, because the mental connection in a relationship is what really matters. But to pretend men haven't always lusted after youth, or that it's somehow wrong, is ... well, wrong.
I feel that as women don't value youth in men they feel it must be intentional on men's part to chase younger women, in order to hurt older women, and, as the article describes, drive the generations apart. It's just not the case. When I'm 50 I know I'll still be blown away by college girls in summer gear. It's just the way it is.
@Agumen: "Why don't I or my friends find women in their thirties and forties as attractive? I don't know, honestly, but how can you criticise something we don't control?"
I think you have missed the point of the post. You do not find women in the their thirties and forties attractive, not because you are biologically hardwired to do so, but because you have been socially conditioned to associate beauty with youth. The article is mentioning the ways in which that social conditioning is harmful to women, both young and old. If you are unfamiliar with social conditioning or social constructs, I would recommend doing a little research on those subjects because it will really open your mind to see the ways in which things you take for granted or assume to be innate, are actually attitudes inherited through your culture.
And you're argument that we don't criticize homosexuals for being attracted to men is a complete strawman because sexual orientation is not socially conditioned.
@Agumen: I'm guessing you are high school or college aged yourself. Otherwise not finding women in their 30s attractive is just odd. Angelina Jolie anyone? Its not like attractiveness runs off a cliff.
I also think chalking this up to anything other than conditioning in dangerous. With the advances in medicine, nutrition, sunscreen and even housing, today's 32 year old probably looks a lot like 200 BCE's 19 year old. But we fetishize female inexperience as much as youthful litheness.
@Agumen: 16 year olds are children. You had best believe that when I have a 16 year old, I won't let my kid make decisions about work or college without parental involvement and consent-- 18 is different, that's legal maturity-- but even then, if you're financially supporting hte kid, you get some say in what they do, since the brain doesn't fully develop till early 20s, and the limbic system is still mostly in control when a kid is still a teen.
@inabook: I feel bad for your future kid. I've been allowed to make big decisions about my life since I was 12 and it's made me a smart, responsible, reasonable adult.
@Agumen: Why don't I or my friends find women in their thirties and forties as attractive?
How old are you?
I ask because, when I was 18, I couldn't imagine finding a man in his 40s attractive.
Now I am about to turn 30, and the men I find most attractive are in their 30s, 40s and 50s. My husband, who is the most attractive man I know, is about to turn 48.
But men who are 18, 19, 20? All look like little boys to me. Do not want.
@HappyLand: Well, if you've turned out ok after making big decisions all on your own since age 12, that's great-- and very rare. Kids that age usually don't make great decisions that are focussed on the future, rather than on immediate gratification. Most kids require actual parenting-- and as such, I intend to be a great parent to my kids-- which includes not letting them make major decisions on your own.
Its so strange that you'd feel sorry for a kid with attentive, caring, parents, rather than ones who have distant, uninvolved parents.
There will never be enough said about this subject. Ever.
That aside, this is one of the biggest reasons I can think of that being a woman is so difficult. Think about it. We're brought up by the world to value a man's opinion. We're taught to place enormous value in our appearances, and if we fall short of the ideal, we're made to feel worthless. We're taught to accept catcalls and comments about our bodies-from strangers, even-as compliments. We absorb the world's edict that we are not ourselves; we are Women. A pretty surface onto which the world's expectations and desires are projected. This starts so early in our lives; it's so sudden and impossible to prepare yourself for. And eventually, you notice that your older peers-who once stood exactly where you are standing-sometimes can't conceal their dislike or distrust for you. They look at you suspiciously, as though the purpose of your existence is to undermine their own. This is NOT a broad indictment of all women. At all. But I'm sure many of you have experienced this very thing at the hands of, say, a coworker, or a mother-in-law, or a boss. In my eyes, being a woman is a struggle that never ends. It just changes shape. The weapons get sharper, the enemy starts to look more and more familiar as we grow into adults. Now, at twenty-seven, I'm no longer worried about men. I share my life with a good one, and that's where my focus is. So no, men and their opinions don't hold nearly as much power as they used to. No. It's the women I worry about now. The attractive older woman who fawns all over my SO, right in front of me. The women I worked with in a doctor's office, who were all older than me by a decade, who shunned me and ignored me and treated me like shit because I was only twenty (and probably a little hussy) and made me so miserable I eventually quit. The woman who eyed me up and down and then told me my outfit was....."fun". All of these little tiny things that women can do to one another to cut eachother down, that each and every one of us has experienced-or committed- at one time or another, know no age, it seems. I hope that if I ever have a daughter, I'll be able to somehow prepare her for this, and let her know that her strength will often be tested, and that she should never forget what she's really worth. I hope, too, that she'll understand, and that she won't let anyone-male or female- make her feel small or powerless or like she's only her body and nothing else. This is a long shot, I know. But I have to hope these things, or I'll feel as though all of my own little sufferings, and the strength they've fostered, will be in vain.
@Aesop's Foibles. YES.: I wish I could promote the whole thing--right from the statement, "There will never be enough said about this" (damn right...getting to older = being alone, right? Not being as valuable) to the resentment you met from other women.
I don't know about you ladies, but I'm curious as to why 18 year old boys aren't sexuality this way. obviously it's damaging, but still, I've known since I was 12 that older men found younger women attractive.
I wish someone would have told me that women find younger men attractive too. It would have made a moment I had, ordering coffee from a college freshman boy a lot less awkward and not feel like that much of a creep.
@judgingnora: Agreed. I don't just like younger guys - in fact I historically go for older ones - but I still feel like a creep when I find them attractive.
@Blueberry26: That is the flip side and REAL injustice of this! Men are socialized to associate youth with beauty and to prize beauty in women. Women are conditioned to associate age with stability/maturity and prize that in men.
Women spoil like milk as they age, but men get to grow older like a fine wine. Its utter rubbish.
@KATE!: I don't think conditioning changes what women are attracted to it, it just changes what women will admit to being attracted to (and date).
My high school musical had a rather buff 17 year old shirtless at one point and the entire female half of the audience gasped. Many older women commented to me later how attractive the actor was in a way that made it clear they felt shouldn't have noticed.
@judgingnora: I assume its because most boys don't get into their "prime" until AFTER high school.
I personally don't think a lot women do either but that is another conversation.
It completely weirded me out the first time I was on the subway and saw a VERY cute guy and realized he was probably in high school.
It still annoys me that I seem to find men in their early 20s very attractive, while being in my early 30s I would NEVER date one.
I don't think it weirded me out so much for the guy being younger, I just never realized i wouldn't be attracted to people who weren't around my age...
I'm less bothered by men who are attracted to youth than by men who are attracted to innocence. Youth has a lot of good associations--energy, enthusiasm, optimism, open-mindedness, iconoclasm. But innocence is only good for a few things--patronizing, ruining, or taking advantage of. ((shudder))
@LittleDogLaughed: Excellent distinctions. Innocence has an emotive connotation that seems to elicit predatory behaviors, like a neon sign announcing the path of least resistance.
@Pinkpepper1818: I'm not even going to address the "some women do get less sexy as they age," because it stems from a maddeningly narrow view of "sexy."
I'd rather ask this, because it's been nagging at me: if the drive to be with young, fertile-looking women is biological, what on earth is the biological imperative/advangtage behind a 60-year-old man having a sexual relationship with a 20-year-old woman? I'm not saying that such a relationship couldn't be mutually fulfilling, but if we're going to keep dipping into the evolutionary biology well, this argument simply doesn't have legs. Specifically, if we're going to talk about cave men (as evolutionary biology so often does), I seriously doubt that it was productive from an evolutionary standpoint for one of the oldest men in any given community to have offspring with a young, healthy member of any given community. In fact, we have plenty of evidence that such a pairing would be counter-productive (the male would no longer be able to provide for the young family, and would likely die before the children had been successfully raised, leaving the young famly extremely vulnerable. We also now have proof that the quality of sperm degenerates as men age, just as does the quality of women's eggs).
I don't buy into evolutionary biology as a means of explaining or rationalizing (often hideous) modern behavior, but if society is dead-set on going that road, I really wish they'd see the flaw in this argument.
@jigglyball: This is my problem with evo bio and evo psych- it rarely questions male privilege.
If you are just looking at who a woman should look to for sperm/fathering, a significantly older man makes no sense.
-He's less likely to be fertile. Male fertility doesn't fall off a cliff but it does drop significantly.
-He's more likely to produce a child with genetic problems. In the last few years Down's, autism, and dwarfism have all been linked to older fathers.
-He's physically weaker. If you need someone to kill a deer with his bare hands so your kids can eat, a 20 year old is your best bet.
-He's less likely to see his kids into adulthood.
@clevernamehere: Exactly. The argument doesn't make a damn bit of sense unless you're wearing your special-issue Male Privilege glasses while conducting the "research."
I'm sure this has been brought up somewhere in the comments already, but Emma Watson is an adult. She's 19 and she was never overly sexualized when she was a minor, to my recollection.
@Jezebabe: Oh, she was. Not in the way Miley Cyrus and the like are, as in she wasn't in any way sexualizing HERSELF, didn't wear skimpy clothing or do pole dances or what have you, but the "damn, she's gonna be hot as hell in a year or two" comments started as early as the first movie when she was what, 12? and very quickly turned into fan sites about boning her and counting down til her "legal" birthday, ect.
I turn 18 next week. I occasionally have had weird relationships with older men. One thought it was sexy I was 17 ("I still has so much to learn, etc etc") where as one had a complex about me not being legal. I slept with neither of them, but it goes to show that while some men have romanticized view of young girls and women, some don't like the "Lolita effect."
@scarletbegonia: "one had a complex about me not being legal"
do you mean he had a problem with it? Because that's not a complex, that's a healthy fear of prison
@scarletbegonia: One of my closest friends when I was 15 started hitting on me and making weird comments for a few years and ultimately kissed me when I was 16 or 17. I can't remember now. There were a lot of "jailbait" jokes and stuff like that. I never saw it coming - I thought he was just kidding around. He was eight years older than me, and I while I no longer consider him a friend, I am still a little angry at how easily he moved from friend into potential partner in his mind, despite being engaged. I am still friends with his wife.
so insightful and on the money. one example of how young women try to pit their sexuality against older women: my husband is 7 years younger than i am. a woman in her 20s who wanted to "steal him" from me told him he'd be sorry he stayed with me because i would be hitting menopause any day now (i was in my mid-40s during this time). she elaborated that her mom was in menopause and was a bitch to live with! plus i wouldn't want sex anymore and would just make his life miserable.
unfortunately for her, this kind of talk only made this young woman even more unattractive to my husband.
@msAnthrope: The hell? I imagine your husband hearing her going on and on about how you were gonna be a bitch when you reached meno and thinking "unlike you, that are a bitch from the fucking get-go..."
@bluebears: at first i was so angry being categorized as asexual because i was "heading for menopause." then i realized this young woman had such a limited view of sexuality and relationships that i almost felt bad for her~~ almost.
I believe a preference for youth in looks (as opposed to youth in behavior) is to a large extent hard-wired in men. Technology is great and all but a woman's most fertile years are her teens and twenties. It's absurd to think men will be able to overcome eons of evolutionary conditioning in a few decades. Of course, this doesn't mean we shouldn't encourage a new paradigm...
@MizJenkins: on the other hand, plenty of men are perfectly capable of finding women their own age attractive. Men's fertility declines as well, so it isn't necessarily "natural" that a 50 year old man would seek out only a 20 year old mate. In fact, as men age their sperm quality declines and they are more likely to produce offspring with genetic mutations and congenital diseases. So evolutionarily speaking, that 50 year old man may be done with his seed-spreading, and thus perfectly content with a woman his own age.
@MizJenkins: I agree that that's probably part of it. However, in a world where girls are reaching physical maturity at a younger and younger age, and functional adolescence is lasting longer and longer, it has less relevance.
@Flackette Goes Retro: Good point. From a pure evolution standpoint, older men should be less likely to want a younger woman because they are past their prime for baby making.
Also, I remember when I was 14 thinking that I would never be able to think someone over 20 was attractive. Then when I hit 25 I realized people UNDER 20 didn't attract me anymore. So it changes. That is why I have had a consistent love of Jason Bateman- he ages right along with me!
@MizJenkins: I think many men harbor a passing sexual attraction to much younger women, but judging by the attitudes of people I come in contact with, and the popularity of things like "MILF porn" and Sarah Palin, I think subconsciously, most men know they won't be as happy with a much-younger partner, or experience some sort of disconnect that limits their pursuit of these relationships to a degree, even in fantasy.
I don't know a lot of people for whom casual sex with a large age disparity is common, even though I do see flirtations and friendships between these acquaintances.
But perhaps I'm an optimist, and much of the popularity of "loli" attraction isn't a construct of Madison Ave....
@MizJenkins: " a woman's most fertile years are her teens and twenties."
Can you tell that to all the people who are convinced that somehow a magical switch will flip and I will want a baby in my 30s?
This is in part why I am absolutely loathe to see young girls in bikinis. A bikini is styled after adult female underwear--clothing for women with hips and breasts. A child in a bikini is tantamount in my view to a little girl prancing around in public in a woman's bra. She doesn't have breasts and she is not an adult; she should be dressed like a child, not a Lolita.
@SarahMC: I couldn't agree more. There's no need for little girls to wear tops. Frankly there shouldn't be a need for anyone to wear tops at any time, but we're a ways away from that ever happening.
@Tchotchke: Hm, I guess since genetics screwed me and I have smaller breasts than most 12 year olds, I should keep a t-shirt on at all times? Wait a minute, do you go to the church I used to go to?
@Tchotchke: I just feel like children should be so devoid of sexuality to adults that it doesn't matter if they're swimming bare ass naked, in a tshirt, or a bikini. Especially if the bikini is a frilly little number with Dora the Explorer on it
@SarahMC: When I went to a family resort in Georgia, some (little) girls from South America didn't want to keep their tops on...it didn't seem indecent, but there are people out there...
@slowpoke.r: Putting a bikini top on a baby girl is announcing, "There will be breasts here eventually." What the hell is the point? Put them in bottoms.
@colormeroutine: I agree with you that children should be devoid of sexuality, I just think that the bikini as a garment has very strong sexual connotations. I think it's unlikely that a bikini can be de-sexualized, so a bikini on a child is, to me, inappropriate. That said, I agree with SarahMC that it is completely acceptable for a little girl to wear just the bottoms, because it seems less sexual to me. I realize that this may not be the clearest explanation, but there is something about a bikini specifically, that strikes me as too overtly sexual for a child.
@scarletbegonia: It's not indecent. There are people out there who molest kids. They're going to be that way whether the kids' torsos are covered at the beach or not. Do you think boys should have to cover their torsos as well?
@Tchotchke: My 9 year old daughter prefers the bikini because it's less of a production when she has to go to the bathroom. I don't notice anyone sexualizing her more or less as a result of wearing one, that's a bit... crazy to me. And I'm the type of mom who will probably not let her wear heels until she's in high school and limited at that.
@SarahMC: I don't know if you remember, but several weeks ago in a re-cap of that toddler beauty pageant show they showed a clip where a two-year old was being spray tanned and her mother had bound her chest- just a strip of cloth across her non-existent breasts. It was so disturbing to me that a little child's chest could already be so sexualized, and by her parent to boot.
It may be a function of that particular milieu to some extent, but it seems to me that most people unconsciously think that a female child, who in actuality looks the same as a male child from the waist up, has "breasts" and that those "breasts" are taboo in public.
@colormeroutine: but what I think SarahMC is getting at is WHY are young girls being required to cover up a space where no breasts actually exist? There is no difference from the waist up between them and boys at that age. So the top is essentially, CREATING "breasts." It's the suggestive nature of it.
@Tchotchke: I agree. And I'll add that swimsuit competitions in the already obscene child beauty pagents do nothing but chum the waters of sexualizing children.
@Tchotchke: Ok, my apologies for snarkiness. I do understand the point you are trying to make, but it does toe the line with the argument I have heard over and over again in conservative circles, the idea that what a young girl wears or looks like is the reason she will be raped or objectified. It leads to victim blaming and places the responsibility for chastity and morality squarely on the young girl.
And also, one pieces seriously suck when you have to pee.
@colormeroutine: I didn't say bikinis make girls hot. They do *add* sexuality to a girl who does not have the secondary sex characteristics for which the top is necessary.
@EndangeredRed: That is why I advocate baby girls wear just the bottoms. The choice is not between a one piece and a bikini, IMO. It's between needlessly and almost pathologically covering a girl's non-existent "breasts" and just letting her wear suit bottoms.
Nobody is saying bikinis are to blame for child abuse. In fact, nobody even mentioned child abuse. Parents and swimsuit manufacturers are sexualizing little girls when they put them in two-pieces.
@EndangeredRed: In one of my comments above, I sided with SarahMC in saying that I fully support little girls being able to go topless. My point is and was that the bikini, as a garment, cannot be separated from its sexual connotation. It projects a suggestive air of sexuality on a child where there is, and should be, none.
As for the conservative argument that certain apparel invites misconduct, or that the victim is to blame: Well, that argument has far too many flaws and ludicrous undertones for me to get into and it certainly does not reflect my views on violence against women (or anyone, really). My views are not in any capacity conservative and I think it takes a huge leap of imagination to conflate my distaste for turning small girls into Lolita-types with victim-blaming. (I don't mean that to sound harsh, though I suppose when typed out, as opposed to spoken, it may come across that way).
But yeah, one pieces are a pain if you need to pee, but they aren't that bad. And besides, the alternative is to go without a top, which is fine as well.
@SarahMC: What if you're just worried about nipple sunburn? If I had a son as pale as I am he'd be swimming in tank tops.
PS I wasn't accusing you of saying that bikinis make girls hot, just that if you made that one larger and put it on an adult they'd look pretty damn silly, not sexy, so I don't see it as sexualizing to put it on a child. Maybe if it was sequined leather or something
@colormeroutine: Boys have nipples too. If you're worried about sunburn then children of either sex should be covered up wherever you think it's needed. My point is that baby girls and baby boys' bodies are not different from the waist up when they are young. They make suits for boys and girls that protect against sunburn.
Of course little kids' suits are going to have a different design than grown women's suits.
@Tchotchke: Our pro-naked torso (hehe) stance would freak many conservatives out. In more liberal countries, going topless is more accepted than it is in more conservative countries (including the U.S.). In fact I think it's conservatives who would INSIST on covering a baby girls' imaginary tits, for all the bogus THINK OF THE CHILDREN!, "indecency," & reactionary child predator reasons.
@Tchotchke: @SarahMC: Yes. I would agree little girls (and arguably all of us females) should be able to go topless. However, I hesitate to proscribe a certain motive or message to a piece of material like a bikini top. What you are saying about the bikini top drawing attention to some non-existent breasts makes sense, but I'm sure many little girls would want to wear a top and many moms probably don't want to deal with the drama their topless toddler might create at the public pool. I don't think the bikini, especially ones designed for kids are inherently sexual. People can twist anything and be creepy in lots of situations, but I would prefer women's freedom to make choices about their bodies to start early.
@pele tiger: Yeah, that's the thing that I can really see for two-pieces.
I dislike the ones that are mimicking adult swimsuits, because it does seem more sexual, but I can totally understand how difficult it would be for a young kid to wrestle themselves in and out of a one-piece (as an adult I still have trouble with it sometimes).
I have zero issue with girls just wearing suit bottoms, but I think all kids should be somewhat covered just for sun protection.
09/19/09
Does the inanity of blaming women's insecurity on society and of vilifying men for finding hot young girls, uh, hot, sink in when you look at it that way?
09/19/09
09/19/09
I really have no problem with objectification or the Lolita fetish (In fact, I've only recently become comfortable with the fact that I do look very young and hey, why shouldn't I enjoy that?), but I do have a problem with society's fetishization (Sp?) of youth, virginity, and "innocence" all at once - it sends a confusing message to everyone.
And DUH, of course kids can't identify with older people - they're KIDS. When I was 18 I knew a hell of lot more than I do now (And well, maybe I was right) and the "old people" never "got it." Reaching a little, I think.
09/19/09
09/19/09
I developed one of the most hyper sezualized traits in our culture as a young girl, at about 13. Really big boobs. The rest of my body was still rather child like and I was extremely childish myself (I still liked to play with Barbies, what can I say?), and found it very hard to deal with my new found and undesired attention. Seriously, the things I heard every single day were like nothing I hear now at age 20, men on the street telling me, a child, they wanted to suck my breasts and things of the like. I hated it with all my heart, I hated myself, I hated men. I walked with my head down and slouching. Then I fought back, I lost my temper and yelled at them on the street as soon as they said something. Then I went through the usual stages of the teenage years, only more cynical (still am, really), and often angry. I never got to be silly and boy crazy and I truly do blame these men's harassment for it. I'm over it now, but it's left its mark on me, and it seems to be getting worse for girls now.
I know some young girls seem to like the attention, but as older men you have to know it's just a game for them, they're testing boundaries, seeing what they can do, trying to develop a sexual identity, but developing a very strong sexual identity at a young age can prevent them developing a true identity outside their sexual selves. No girl should proudly identify herself as an object.
(Also I'm new here so hello everyone!)
09/18/09
I've noticed that the successful or fulfilled guys my age seem to connect with women our age. It's the guys who feel unaccomplished who seem to seek out very young women, and that speaks volumes to me.
Because honestly, to be a little cruel here, I've seen way more men go downhill looks-wise as early as their late 20's, whereas many women stay young-looking and conventionally pretty for a long time. I just turned 42 and I beat college boys off with a stick. I don't know any men my age who are being pursued by college girls. None. The whole "changed a 40 in for 2 20's ha ha" is just a myth men like to scare their wives with.
09/18/09
That isn't true and it has never been true. 40 year old men are not routinely getting with 20 years. Yes, it happens, but it is a rarity. Dating at every age has its own challenges for both genders.
It really bothers me to see Jez posters in this thread reinforce the stereotype that male aging has no effect on their dating prospects.
09/18/09
I also find it funny that so many people here are criticising men's sexuality, which values youth in women. You wouldn't criticise a homosexual for not finding the opposite gender attractive, etc. But men's sexuality is apparently open for attack.
I don't look at an 18 year old and think, 'gee, I bet she's dumb and easy to control'. I think, 'Holy damn she is gorgeous.' Why does this effect fade with age? Why don't I or my friends find women in their thirties and forties as attractive? I don't know, honestly, but how can you criticise something we don't control?
Obviously, I'd prefer to date someone in my age range, because the mental connection in a relationship is what really matters. But to pretend men haven't always lusted after youth, or that it's somehow wrong, is ... well, wrong.
I feel that as women don't value youth in men they feel it must be intentional on men's part to chase younger women, in order to hurt older women, and, as the article describes, drive the generations apart. It's just not the case. When I'm 50 I know I'll still be blown away by college girls in summer gear. It's just the way it is.
09/18/09
I think you have missed the point of the post. You do not find women in the their thirties and forties attractive, not because you are biologically hardwired to do so, but because you have been socially conditioned to associate beauty with youth. The article is mentioning the ways in which that social conditioning is harmful to women, both young and old. If you are unfamiliar with social conditioning or social constructs, I would recommend doing a little research on those subjects because it will really open your mind to see the ways in which things you take for granted or assume to be innate, are actually attitudes inherited through your culture.
And you're argument that we don't criticize homosexuals for being attracted to men is a complete strawman because sexual orientation is not socially conditioned.
09/18/09
I also think chalking this up to anything other than conditioning in dangerous. With the advances in medicine, nutrition, sunscreen and even housing, today's 32 year old probably looks a lot like 200 BCE's 19 year old. But we fetishize female inexperience as much as youthful litheness.
09/18/09
09/19/09
09/19/09
How old are you?
I ask because, when I was 18, I couldn't imagine finding a man in his 40s attractive.
Now I am about to turn 30, and the men I find most attractive are in their 30s, 40s and 50s. My husband, who is the most attractive man I know, is about to turn 48.
But men who are 18, 19, 20? All look like little boys to me. Do not want.
Where you are in life has a lot to do with it.
09/19/09
Its so strange that you'd feel sorry for a kid with attentive, caring, parents, rather than ones who have distant, uninvolved parents.
09/18/09
That aside, this is one of the biggest reasons I can think of that being a woman is so difficult. Think about it. We're brought up by the world to value a man's opinion. We're taught to place enormous value in our appearances, and if we fall short of the ideal, we're made to feel worthless. We're taught to accept catcalls and comments about our bodies-from strangers, even-as compliments. We absorb the world's edict that we are not ourselves; we are Women. A pretty surface onto which the world's expectations and desires are projected. This starts so early in our lives; it's so sudden and impossible to prepare yourself for. And eventually, you notice that your older peers-who once stood exactly where you are standing-sometimes can't conceal their dislike or distrust for you. They look at you suspiciously, as though the purpose of your existence is to undermine their own. This is NOT a broad indictment of all women. At all. But I'm sure many of you have experienced this very thing at the hands of, say, a coworker, or a mother-in-law, or a boss. In my eyes, being a woman is a struggle that never ends. It just changes shape. The weapons get sharper, the enemy starts to look more and more familiar as we grow into adults. Now, at twenty-seven, I'm no longer worried about men. I share my life with a good one, and that's where my focus is. So no, men and their opinions don't hold nearly as much power as they used to. No. It's the women I worry about now. The attractive older woman who fawns all over my SO, right in front of me. The women I worked with in a doctor's office, who were all older than me by a decade, who shunned me and ignored me and treated me like shit because I was only twenty (and probably a little hussy) and made me so miserable I eventually quit. The woman who eyed me up and down and then told me my outfit was....."fun". All of these little tiny things that women can do to one another to cut eachother down, that each and every one of us has experienced-or committed- at one time or another, know no age, it seems. I hope that if I ever have a daughter, I'll be able to somehow prepare her for this, and let her know that her strength will often be tested, and that she should never forget what she's really worth. I hope, too, that she'll understand, and that she won't let anyone-male or female- make her feel small or powerless or like she's only her body and nothing else. This is a long shot, I know. But I have to hope these things, or I'll feel as though all of my own little sufferings, and the strength they've fostered, will be in vain.
09/18/09
Both realities piss me off, big time.
09/18/09
I wish someone would have told me that women find younger men attractive too. It would have made a moment I had, ordering coffee from a college freshman boy a lot less awkward and not feel like that much of a creep.
09/18/09
09/18/09
Women spoil like milk as they age, but men get to grow older like a fine wine. Its utter rubbish.
09/18/09
My high school musical had a rather buff 17 year old shirtless at one point and the entire female half of the audience gasped. Many older women commented to me later how attractive the actor was in a way that made it clear they felt shouldn't have noticed.
09/18/09
I personally don't think a lot women do either but that is another conversation.
It completely weirded me out the first time I was on the subway and saw a VERY cute guy and realized he was probably in high school.
It still annoys me that I seem to find men in their early 20s very attractive, while being in my early 30s I would NEVER date one.
I don't think it weirded me out so much for the guy being younger, I just never realized i wouldn't be attracted to people who weren't around my age...
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
It's hardwired in men to look for someone who looks ready to have babies. That's not really their fault.
BUT I cannot agree with ads like this:
[www.thedailybeast.com]
This girl isn't even 18. She might think and act like a 30 year old, but it's just too young to label yourself as a sex object.
09/18/09
I'd rather ask this, because it's been nagging at me: if the drive to be with young, fertile-looking women is biological, what on earth is the biological imperative/advangtage behind a 60-year-old man having a sexual relationship with a 20-year-old woman? I'm not saying that such a relationship couldn't be mutually fulfilling, but if we're going to keep dipping into the evolutionary biology well, this argument simply doesn't have legs. Specifically, if we're going to talk about cave men (as evolutionary biology so often does), I seriously doubt that it was productive from an evolutionary standpoint for one of the oldest men in any given community to have offspring with a young, healthy member of any given community. In fact, we have plenty of evidence that such a pairing would be counter-productive (the male would no longer be able to provide for the young family, and would likely die before the children had been successfully raised, leaving the young famly extremely vulnerable. We also now have proof that the quality of sperm degenerates as men age, just as does the quality of women's eggs).
I don't buy into evolutionary biology as a means of explaining or rationalizing (often hideous) modern behavior, but if society is dead-set on going that road, I really wish they'd see the flaw in this argument.
09/18/09
If you are just looking at who a woman should look to for sperm/fathering, a significantly older man makes no sense.
-He's less likely to be fertile. Male fertility doesn't fall off a cliff but it does drop significantly.
-He's more likely to produce a child with genetic problems. In the last few years Down's, autism, and dwarfism have all been linked to older fathers.
-He's physically weaker. If you need someone to kill a deer with his bare hands so your kids can eat, a 20 year old is your best bet.
-He's less likely to see his kids into adulthood.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
do you mean he had a problem with it? Because that's not a complex, that's a healthy fear of prison
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
unfortunately for her, this kind of talk only made this young woman even more unattractive to my husband.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Perhaps one of the most important things my father has ever said to me was (when I was about 16): "At your age, I thought I knew everything, too."
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Also, I remember when I was 14 thinking that I would never be able to think someone over 20 was attractive. Then when I hit 25 I realized people UNDER 20 didn't attract me anymore. So it changes. That is why I have had a consistent love of Jason Bateman- he ages right along with me!
09/18/09
I don't know a lot of people for whom casual sex with a large age disparity is common, even though I do see flirtations and friendships between these acquaintances.
But perhaps I'm an optimist, and much of the popularity of "loli" attraction isn't a construct of Madison Ave....
09/18/09
Can you tell that to all the people who are convinced that somehow a magical switch will flip and I will want a baby in my 30s?
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I'm a one piece/tankini fan.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
THANK YOU! You explained exactly what I was trying to convey, but more succinctly.
09/18/09
09/18/09
@SarahMC: I just don't see how this is in any way sexual. It's just adorable. On an adult woman it would look ridiculous, not hot
09/18/09
09/18/09
It may be a function of that particular milieu to some extent, but it seems to me that most people unconsciously think that a female child, who in actuality looks the same as a male child from the waist up, has "breasts" and that those "breasts" are taboo in public.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
And also, one pieces seriously suck when you have to pee.
09/18/09
09/18/09
Nobody is saying bikinis are to blame for child abuse. In fact, nobody even mentioned child abuse. Parents and swimsuit manufacturers are sexualizing little girls when they put them in two-pieces.
09/18/09
As for the conservative argument that certain apparel invites misconduct, or that the victim is to blame: Well, that argument has far too many flaws and ludicrous undertones for me to get into and it certainly does not reflect my views on violence against women (or anyone, really). My views are not in any capacity conservative and I think it takes a huge leap of imagination to conflate my distaste for turning small girls into Lolita-types with victim-blaming. (I don't mean that to sound harsh, though I suppose when typed out, as opposed to spoken, it may come across that way).
But yeah, one pieces are a pain if you need to pee, but they aren't that bad. And besides, the alternative is to go without a top, which is fine as well.
09/18/09
PS I wasn't accusing you of saying that bikinis make girls hot, just that if you made that one larger and put it on an adult they'd look pretty damn silly, not sexy, so I don't see it as sexualizing to put it on a child. Maybe if it was sequined leather or something
09/18/09
Of course little kids' suits are going to have a different design than grown women's suits.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I dislike the ones that are mimicking adult swimsuits, because it does seem more sexual, but I can totally understand how difficult it would be for a young kid to wrestle themselves in and out of a one-piece (as an adult I still have trouble with it sometimes).
I have zero issue with girls just wearing suit bottoms, but I think all kids should be somewhat covered just for sun protection.
09/18/09
09/19/09
There is no winning.