I have never forgotten an article I read in 1997 in the Atlantic Monthly, about how Americans view murder as entertainment. The article profiled the group Parents of Murdered Children and pointed out that murder is not cool, it is not fun, it is not funny. It is murder. I have not been able to watch a graphic movie or even play "Clue" since. Here's the link:
@ihateyourescalade: I think our nation's fascination with murder is somewhat more complicated, having more to do with our fears and insecurities, attempting to gain power over powerlessness. That being said, thank you for this link. It's a fascinating and important article.
I studied this case for my criminal justice classes. Due to delicacies in the era she lived in her claim of blood on her dress was due to, as she put it, "flea bite" which at the time was a polite euphemism for menstrual cycle. Police didn't do too much exploring of that defense. That was a key piece of evidence, however, that could have been explored further.
Also, her claims that someone must have come into the house were bogus because it would have been almost impossible not to have been noticed by someone due to the weird layout of the house. There were no hallways as every room led into another.
Due to the nature of her realtionship with her parents she harbored a lot of anger. It is possible for someone to do that sort of thing and never commit another act like that again because their anger and violence is localized and not directed at people in general. Since she was the most likely suspect for having done that crime, she "solved" the problem herself and lived the rest of her life in peace by all accounts.
I remember reading an essay about Lizzie that made some convincing arguments that she had done it. Basically that if you look at her behavior from a WASP standpoint there was plenty of evidence that she was guilty. Found it!
My grandma Rita grew up in Fall River in the early teens and twenties when Lizzie was still alive. I was always told this story about how someone who worked for the family (nanny/governess/maid or something, they were a big Jewish family and her father was a lawyer) had gone to school with Lizzie and when the children were bad she would say "If you don't behave, I'm going to call Lizzie."
I just Googled Lizzie Borden, and until today I had no idea that she was an adult when she allegedly committed the murders. All this time, I had assumed she was a kid -- probably because of her name (Lizzie versus Liz or Elizabeth) and the fact that she was famous for supposedly kiling her parents. So I always imagined the infamous Lizzie Borden as a Victorian Michael Myers figure.
@BabyJane: Yeah, saw that on Wikipedia, but I'd never heard that moniker 'til today. I always just knew her as "Lizzie Borden, the girl who killed her parents."
@Kivrin: I probably know more about her than I should, but she was talked about a lot growing up in New England.
On another note, I always find it jarring, when I visualize something in my head for years and then find out it's not quite what I had pictured. It's a little bit like finding out the song lyrics you have been singing, were totally wrong.
I find the notion that the name of a historical character in the public domain can be trademarked annoying and believe it should be illegal. But I have trademarked the name of Caligula and Nero for my new range of pastas and bath oils.
What do you guys think? Guilty? Innocent? I read a book once that posited the theory that her sister did it, Lizzie knew and covered for her. It was somewhat persuasive, but I don't know. Common sense says she did it.
@bluebears: I grew up next door to Fall River. My whole family is from there. Most people believe she did it but the 150 year old woman, or so it seemed, at the Fall River Historical Society never did. "Lizzie was never convicted."
@bluebears: There was also an episode of Alfred Hitchock Presents that posited that her sister did it. I read a book that said her father had an illegitmate son who had mental problems and killed the parents. Me? I think she was most likely guilty.
@MissPeacock: The burned dress, the poison she purchased (and the subsequent sickness that gripped the household), and the horrible demeanor of the father point to Lizzie. A robber wouldn't have gone into that wealthy man's house and stolen nothing. This person HATED Borden and his wife. Lizzie had just learned that the wife was getting a big chunk of the inheritance. Too many coincidences, I wager.
@LuvEwan: The book argues that both sisters hated him (and the step mother) and wanted to kill them. Emma was immediately cleared in the minds of law enforcement because she was out of town, but the book argued that the actual distance back was not insurmountable and I think there was also evidence that Emma was unaccounted for that day, the people she was supposedly staying with said that they "couldn't find her" or something and then she returned to the house.
@bluebears: I am on the guilty train for her. Though, I do not believe that she committed the murders in the nude as some theorist posit. I believe the brown stained "paint" dress she burned was her blood stained murder attire.
08/26/09
I have never forgotten an article I read in 1997 in the Atlantic Monthly, about how Americans view murder as entertainment. The article profiled the group Parents of Murdered Children and pointed out that murder is not cool, it is not fun, it is not funny. It is murder. I have not been able to watch a graphic movie or even play "Clue" since. Here's the link:
[www.theatlantic.com]
08/26/09
08/26/09
Also, her claims that someone must have come into the house were bogus because it would have been almost impossible not to have been noticed by someone due to the weird layout of the house. There were no hallways as every room led into another.
Due to the nature of her realtionship with her parents she harbored a lot of anger. It is possible for someone to do that sort of thing and never commit another act like that again because their anger and violence is localized and not directed at people in general. Since she was the most likely suspect for having done that crime, she "solved" the problem herself and lived the rest of her life in peace by all accounts.
08/26/09
[www.nationalreview.com]
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
On another note, I always find it jarring, when I visualize something in my head for years and then find out it's not quite what I had pictured. It's a little bit like finding out the song lyrics you have been singing, were totally wrong.
This actually happens to me a lot.
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
Yes, such a thing exists.
08/26/09
[www.museumofbadart.org]
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/21/09