Ugh. The LAPD is the just a huge waste of state money. I wouldn't be saying this if they actually did their jobs but they don't (they're still corrupt as shit). Has anyone else from L.A. noticed them skulking around on the streets more looking for people to stop and ticket? Cali. is so hard up they send these assholes out on the street more often to stop people and get that speeding ticket/other offense money. #policebrutality
@Evie Havok: I've been pretty impressed with some of the work the LAPD has done under Bratton. All major crime rates are down, homicides are at a 38-year low, and the gang sweeps over the last year have been very thorough and well executed.
But yeah, they still like to beat the crap out of people. #policebrutality
@Evie Havok: I got two tickets within two weeks for total bullshit, including "making a left turn over a double yellow line." I'm so mad. I don't think the way to fix California's budget problem is by siphoning money from its citizens. #policebrutality
As a "police do nice things also story" My friend and I were crossing the street this week and a lady in her Lexus ran a stop sign and cut us off. There just happened to be a police car behind her and they quickly pulled her over. I just appreciated that they treated it as serious. I know there are important crimes than pissing people off in a cross walk, but we really appreciated it! We drove by and said thank you! #policebrutality
Why is it okay for the media, presumably to sell copy, to leak the name and photograph of a police officer, being investigated for, but hitherto not charged with, leaking the name and photograph of a third party, presumably for financial gain, to the media?
@Rare Affinity: Rhianna was a crime victim. This officer is potentially a perpitrator. If we were going to follow that logic, we'd never release names until a guilty verdict or plea was returned.
@PinkSoxHat:
@schweppes: I am highlighting the hypocrisy of the media, who were quick to use Rihanna's pictures without being scrupulous enough to question the source at the time. I note that some on here already seem to think the officer is guilty.
@Rare Affinity: I just don't think it's hypocritical. Using the Rhianna pictures may have been morally wrong, but there's nothing morally wrong about reporting facts re: an investigation. Whether other people don't understand the difference between an investigation and a conviction isn't the media's fault.
Umm, instead of Officer Rebecca Reyes, I think you mean "ffcr Rbcc Rys," as she clearly deserves to be disemvoweled for this sort of woman on woman crime. Hope that TMZ money keeps her warm if she goes to trial.
I'm not calling out Jez on this, just a blanket statement across the board, it's extremely irresponsible to release their names before the investigation is final and culpability is official.
@LaurieStrodeTheBoatAshore: Kinda like it's extremely irresponsible to release a brutal photo without permission? That LAPD track record sure is spiffy.
@LaurieStrodeTheBoatAshore: I don't think it is. There's nothing unclear about anything in the post: the officer is obviously just being investigated, there's no language implying otherwise.
@schweppes: It can be extremely damaging if its not true or if her association is not as extreme as what is being reported now during the investigation. In cases where a suspect (in any profession) has been linked to a crime, only to have been vindicated. You rarely see the media blitz to announce and then remind the public in cases of exoneration unless the injured party sues for libel or defamation. In cases like this, that's not an option, we're reporting an investigation, no actual blame placed, but the reputation is damaged, and that damage can be permanent.
@Triana Orpheus, agreed, extremely irresponsible to leak the photo but you don't know these officers have done that yet for sure. What is wrong with simply reporting two officers are being investigated and are on paid leave?
I'm not saying the officers mentioned are NOT guilty of doing it. Just saying put down the torches and pitchforks until you know for sure.
@LaurieStrodeTheBoatAshore: It's not the newsreporter's job to make sure that no one's name is associated with anything negative until a jury convicts the person. There's no way that a person who is actually being investigated would be able to sue a newspaper that reports that fact.
@LaurieStrodeTheBoatAshore: Love the torches and pitchfork imagery. I still don’t understand how or indeed why people have made the giant leap from being investigated to being found guilty.
@schweppes: "There's no way that a person who is actually being investigated would be able to sue a newspaper that reports that fact." Exactly, that's why I'm saying, if she's vindicated, she has no recourse. (eta) Yet the negative press may very well linger.
@LaurieStrodeTheBoatAshore: You seem to be advocating a system where names aren't released until the guilty verdict is made. Or should we wait for a full round of appeals? I'm not saying that an accusation that turns out to be untrue doesn't damage people, but I think that's solved, not by muting media outlets, but by educating people on what "innocent until proven guilty" really means.
@schweppes: I'm actually not totally against a system where names aren't released until proven guilty. It would certainly hold us to our beloved presumption of innocence and promote the likelihood for an unbiased jury in cases of a trial. But this is an investigation, it's not a trial, it's not a matter of being found guilty or innocent, there aren't even formal charges yet. These people will be demonized and I'll be happy to form an opinion if/when they are found to be the culprits. If they are not the ones who leaked the photos, then they get to play damage control, their families have to deal with geniuses who don't understand the difference between 'suspect' and 'guilty'. The net provides a wealth of information. Do you think whack jobs can't track down their phone numbers or addresses (the original article gave one officer's street name for Pete's sake) and take this up as a case of their own. In LOS ANGELES? If the media were more tenacious in its resolve to report clarity and truth, I wouldn't take issue. And I also can read between the lines and see that the LAPD certainly haven't done much to protect the identify of their own to deflect the attention from their department as a whole to individuals, and I think that sucks balls too.
@Rare Affinity: It's not about penalizing someone more harshly... but I feel that women would have more empathy with each other (and therefore not leak the photos.) I find it surprising and saddening that this isn't the case.
I know that leaking the image was a horrible thing to do and the person responsible deserves to be severely punished. But...part of me thinks that there was a positive aspect to leaking the photo. Rihanna put a face to domestic violence, it became a topic that was covered heavily in the media. It got people really talking about the issue and undoubtedly caused a wave of volunteers to donate time and resources to shelters. So in the long run, I think a lot of good things came from the embarrassment she undoubtedly suffered at the hands of a member of the LAPD. Now, if we could only get some stricter punishment for abusers.
@CurtCole: It's unfortunate that we live in a society where it's necessary, but you may be right. I actually still have not seen the photo, people's reactions from seeing it was enough for me.
@CurtCole: Although its a good thing domesitc violence is being more adressed in the mainstream, it doesn't mean Rihanna has to be the sacrificial lamb here. Why does she have to be the face? Simply because she's famous? She should be known for her talents and not for the fact Chris Brown abused her. That undermines her music. I hate it when individuals just become faces for a cause because the public demands it. If Rihanna wants to, then its fine. But to make her be one, when she isn't is not right.
Those images shouldn't have been leaked, I don't think so anyone so recent after such a horrible thing would want the world seeing them like that. Pity would be the last thing I want.
@CurtCole: I think we have to remember though that it wasn't Rihanna's choice to be the face of domestic violence. It's one thing to come out and say "I was a victim and I want to talk about it." But from all appearances she just wants to get on with her life and in the case of some gossip, she wants to continue a relationship with Chris Brown.
@CurtCole: That photo should never have been leaked. However, it had the effect of making sure the incident wasn't just swept under the rug. By seeing Rihanna's battered face, no one could deny what really happened that evening.
"In addition, he would leave his Christmas trees up for about seven months."
What like my family is the only one that does this. I mean not as long as 7 months but it'll usually be up 2-3 months after Christmas because everyone is too damn lazy to take it down.
@Eric Northman is mine: I have a friend whose daughter was so lazy, she left hers up until Christmas came around again. Of course, eventually, she had her kids taken away.
I can't believe Dash Snow is dead. He was wonderful and I feel utterly heartbroken. This sounds so silly but I honestly can't put into words how sad I am.
10/23/09
10/23/09
But yeah, they still like to beat the crap out of people. #policebrutality
10/23/09
10/23/09
10/23/09
10/23/09
10/23/09
10/23/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
@schweppes: I am highlighting the hypocrisy of the media, who were quick to use Rihanna's pictures without being scrupulous enough to question the source at the time. I note that some on here already seem to think the officer is guilty.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
@Triana Orpheus, agreed, extremely irresponsible to leak the photo but you don't know these officers have done that yet for sure. What is wrong with simply reporting two officers are being investigated and are on paid leave?
I'm not saying the officers mentioned are NOT guilty of doing it. Just saying put down the torches and pitchforks until you know for sure.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
Those images shouldn't have been leaked, I don't think so anyone so recent after such a horrible thing would want the world seeing them like that. Pity would be the last thing I want.
09/15/09
09/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
What like my family is the only one that does this. I mean not as long as 7 months but it'll usually be up 2-3 months after Christmas because everyone is too damn lazy to take it down.
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09