@BlondeGoddess: But she's saying it in a kinda gross way. I think that's why. I think it's gross to smell a wet diaper like a "baked good", whether or love your children or not. It's pee, not perfume! :) #sarahjessicaparker
@kookla: Well she's commenting on changing her current childrens' diapers so... yeah, I do. Not all of them, but at least some of them. #sarahjessicaparker
Also, SMG? Listen. There are lots of "selfless" things a person can do. One can volunteer their time to helping others, advocating for a worthy cause, donating money to charity, or choosing to live in a socially-aware way. Having a child can also be one of them. Seriously, I'm glad you're happy, I wish you lots of happiness and love and all that good stuff, but having a baby =/= selfless. Having a baby = having a baby. Lots of people have kids and don't become selfless.
I shouldn't even post this comment - it feels really mean and self-centered, but it just pisses me off when people have kids, and then tell me how awesome they are for it. People donate time, love and goodness in all sorts of ways. You don't have to be a parent to be selfless, and you don't have to be selfless to be a parent. #sarahjessicaparker
@boxspelunker: I believe you do have to be selfless, in some ways, to have a kid and raise it. But on the other hand, in some ways, you have to be selfish. So yah, in this overpopulated world of ours, I am not going to praise the choice to have children.
I love SMG but that comment bothered me. Even just the idea of her saying that people aren't capable of being good parents in their 20's. You might have not have been but others are capable of that - we all grow at different rates. #sarahjessicaparker
@boxspelunker: Yes! And some people make very good, selfless parents even when they're in their twenties! If you're the kind of person who steps up to the plate you'll probably do it just as well in your twenties as in your thirties or beyond.
Good for her, she's happy with the choices she made. That's really wonderful. But I wish she didn't have to imply that people making different choices aren't as perfect as her. #sarahjessicaparker
@Elaken: I agree with your second point, I had a kid in my 20's and one in my 30's and yes, people do grow at different rates. People who want kids should have them when they're ready. I know many people in their late 30's, early 40's and they will never be ready and I know some parents in their 20's who are doing just fine. #sarahjessicaparker
@Elaken: I can't bear it when people who have been parents for all of, ooh, five minutes, start sharing their 'wisdom' with the world. I'm glad they're happy but, seriously, they know fuck-all.
As for the age thing... I've been a young mother and an older mother - had my first kid in my early 20s and my last kid in my late 30s. There are pros and cons to both, and a good parent works with what they've got. Yeah, I was more patient as an older mother but I had a lot more energy as a younger mother. I'm more stable now, I was more adventurous then. Different, not better. #sarahjessicaparker
@boxspelunker: and if you grew the thing in your own stomach using your own dna and body materials, it isn't really selfless anyway, as it's just a continuation of your own damn self. #sarahjessicaparker
@Elaken: I think to be a good parent, a certain amount of selflessness and selfishness is needed (in the appropriate amounts and times, of course!). But the act of being a parent alone is not selflessness nor does it necessarily create selflessness. That's really what I take issue with. I know lots of kindof crappy parents, who talk big talk about how magical, wonderful and selfless being a parent is, when they are unwilling to make very many sacrifices for their child. Maybe that's why it burns my butt so much? :)
@AnotherJenn: This is also true! Some 2o-somethings are great parents. I just didn't like how condescending it sounded, I guess.
@metalkate: In a way, having a baby is completely unmiraculous - it happens every day, around the world, it is needed for the continuation of the species, etc., etc. I know when it happens on a micro level, it's totally different, but I hate it when parents act like they are the only ones ever who have experienced such a thing. It's like, on a macro level, this is nothing. Don't start lecturing people just yet. :) #sarahjessicaparker
Michael Lohan is a huge douche, but I kind of love the idea of God looking down on Hollywood and deciding who will be smote with a role in 'Labor Pains' and who will be spared. #sarahjessicaparker
@NellMood: And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.
And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is given this day in the city of Los Angeles a Stinker, which is Labor Pains, the movie.
-Luke 2:9-11 #sarahjessicaparker
Has he bought the WSJ yet? Or did he just take Rupert Murdoch out for lunch a couple days ago while they agreed what headlines should go in the next paper?
I was already pissed about healthcare because last night I found out my insurance won't reimburse me AT ALL for therapy and won't even explain why, and now this.
@Lymed: How, exactly, do I go about appellation, asking for an explanation, etc.? All I got was this explanation of benefits form with numbers on it, pretty much saying "This cost this much. You will pay this much." and nothing else.
I'm only 25 so I usually ask my parents for guidance if it's my first time dealing with some great Adult Responsibility (TM), but they're not so therapy-positive.
@Ri_L: Do you have individual insurance or insurance through your employer? If it is through your employer, they are required to send you a summary plan description (SPD) that explains how to appeal. You should ask for that, but you can also call and ask for where to send appeals. When you appeal, give a reason, not just that you think they should pay. Why should they pay? Why do you think it is covered under the plan (read the SPD for answers). There should be something explaining why. Look for a little letter that goes to a footnote. They usually use letters to code the reasons for denials. You can also call and ask why it was denied. They should be able to give a more detailed explanation. You may have gone out of network or needed pre-authorization. If it was mental health therapy, unfortunately some plans dropped mental health coverage so they don't need to meet parity requirements.
If it is individual insurance, they should still have to provide you with the same basic information. You can call your state insurance commission for details.
If anyone trusts, believes, and supports Karl Rove and his comments is truly not an American that believes in a democratic law or respect.
While I will support his rights to say what he says, he in turn would never support mine. He is in this game for his own profit and perspectives and not the Ameican people.
I am a republican and I denounce Karl Rove as the crimminal he truly is.
Support true health care reform that lowers our costs and stops the imperial insurance companies from receiving and taking our money, homes, and lives.
We would never let a dictator do this, why are we allowing insurance companies to do this to us?
How did we get to a place where health care is a financial decision in this country? I really don't want some executive sitting in a conference room somewhere deciding whether my health is a good investment or not. And neither should any of these people who rally against reform. I boggles my mind that so many of them are just like me, we have what amounts to just barely adequate coverage that we're paying for through our company anyway. I mean, I pay $65 pre-tax every pay check for my health insurance. Would a tax for a public health plan really be so much more?
@lucyjae: "How did we get to a place where health care is a financial decision in this country?"
When we decided to make health care a for-profit industry. Because once we decide it's a good idea to let the free market dictate health care, that leads to the scenario you described: an executive in a boardroom deciding his first priority is to the shareholders, not the people who buy policies and trust that those policies are going to protect them when they get sick.
In reading comments here and other related posts expressing disappointment in the likely plan to pass, and feeling some disappointment of my own, I think about how quickly we (meaning Democrats - sorry for the generalization) eat our own. We want something big to happen, it doesn't turn out as great as it could be or we want it to be, so we get mad, we get sad, and we don't show up at the polls next time. Then the other team comes in and mucks and/or stalls it all up. Republicans are much better at sticking together through shit like this. Admittedly, they are in some disarray now, but they also seem poised to come out in big numbers to vote next time, because even if they don't agree with each other, they are energized about hating Democrats. When Obama signs that bill with his magic pen, we ought to get energized too. Getting any kind of health care reform passed - however imperfect - is a big fucking deal.
@dreamweave: no its not. its really really not. It's not a big fucking deal. It's paltry. I'm sick of these low expectations we have for the people we elect into Congress to represent us.
@bluebears: I get it that we disagree on this, but I don't understand how not allowing insurance companies to deny coverage b/c of pre-existing conditions is not a big fucking deal. I also don't understand how getting health insurance for 29 million Americans who didn't have it before is not a big fucking deal.
@dreamweave: why do you assume that they would even be able to afford it? do you honestly think that when this bill goes into effect 29 million americans will become magically insured? I think its not a big deal based on how horribly fucked up the system is top to bottom. If something is fucked up in 50 different ways and you correct 1 single thing, that is not a big deal. That is a very slow start.
@dreamweave: The Republicans are better at sticking together because they require sticking to the party line or they will back a primary opponent against whoever disagrees with the party platform. The Democrats do not do this, and so-called Dems go against the party platforms in favor of those who provide their campaign funds. I think that is more of a factor than that we don't support our party enough.
@dreamweave: There are some good things in the Senate bill. But I'm really pissed that the Senate bill doesn't have a public option and if I had the chance to vote out a Democrat who voted against the public option in favor for a more progressive Democrat, I would (alas I don't get to vote for a Senator at all though).
The problem is that this is our moment, this is our time (as our President once said). I lived through health reform failing in the 90's and it took over 10 years to get another opportunity. This is our opportunity for a public plan. We won't have the opportunity next year. People will say health reform was done and when people are unhappy, they will say the Democrats screwed up. Then nobody will want to ever talk about a public option again just like nobody wants to talk about single payer after it failed in the 90's.
I work every day with people who are underinsured. People who have insurance but can't pay their hospital bills. People who have insurance but skip pills because they can't afford their medications. They are underinsured because their employers won't pay for good coverage. It sickens me every single day and I don't think the Senate Bill will do anything for them.
oh and? My friend told me yesterday she just got a letter in the mail from her provider informing her that her payment for her coverage would be increasing by 25% (!!) because of new government reforms that hurt the insurance companies. nice huh? yeah again, no public option = empire strikes back
@bluebears: I've heard this a lot and it infuriates me. Isn't this fraud? No bill has passed yet so that can't possibly know what will be in it and the eventual cost to them enough to come up with a specific number. This seems like a blatant political move to scare and rile up their customers to get them to oppose reform.
06:52 AM
08:36 AM
12:37 PM
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
03:07 AM
11/06/09
Also, SMG? Listen. There are lots of "selfless" things a person can do. One can volunteer their time to helping others, advocating for a worthy cause, donating money to charity, or choosing to live in a socially-aware way. Having a child can also be one of them. Seriously, I'm glad you're happy, I wish you lots of happiness and love and all that good stuff, but having a baby =/= selfless. Having a baby = having a baby. Lots of people have kids and don't become selfless.
I shouldn't even post this comment - it feels really mean and self-centered, but it just pisses me off when people have kids, and then tell me how awesome they are for it. People donate time, love and goodness in all sorts of ways. You don't have to be a parent to be selfless, and you don't have to be selfless to be a parent. #sarahjessicaparker
11/06/09
I love SMG but that comment bothered me. Even just the idea of her saying that people aren't capable of being good parents in their 20's. You might have not have been but others are capable of that - we all grow at different rates. #sarahjessicaparker
11/06/09
Good for her, she's happy with the choices she made. That's really wonderful. But I wish she didn't have to imply that people making different choices aren't as perfect as her. #sarahjessicaparker
11/06/09
09:25 AM
As for the age thing... I've been a young mother and an older mother - had my first kid in my early 20s and my last kid in my late 30s. There are pros and cons to both, and a good parent works with what they've got. Yeah, I was more patient as an older mother but I had a lot more energy as a younger mother. I'm more stable now, I was more adventurous then. Different, not better. #sarahjessicaparker
09:35 AM
12:30 PM
@AnotherJenn: This is also true! Some 2o-somethings are great parents. I just didn't like how condescending it sounded, I guess.
@metalkate: In a way, having a baby is completely unmiraculous - it happens every day, around the world, it is needed for the continuation of the species, etc., etc. I know when it happens on a micro level, it's totally different, but I hate it when parents act like they are the only ones ever who have experienced such a thing. It's like, on a macro level, this is nothing. Don't start lecturing people just yet. :) #sarahjessicaparker
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is given this day in the city of Los Angeles a Stinker, which is Labor Pains, the movie.
-Luke 2:9-11 #sarahjessicaparker
11/06/09
10/08/09
Has he bought the WSJ yet? Or did he just take Rupert Murdoch out for lunch a couple days ago while they agreed what headlines should go in the next paper?
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
I'm only 25 so I usually ask my parents for guidance if it's my first time dealing with some great Adult Responsibility (TM), but they're not so therapy-positive.
10/08/09
If it is individual insurance, they should still have to provide you with the same basic information. You can call your state insurance commission for details.
10/08/09
10/08/09
While I will support his rights to say what he says, he in turn would never support mine. He is in this game for his own profit and perspectives and not the Ameican people.
I am a republican and I denounce Karl Rove as the crimminal he truly is.
Support true health care reform that lowers our costs and stops the imperial insurance companies from receiving and taking our money, homes, and lives.
We would never let a dictator do this, why are we allowing insurance companies to do this to us?
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
When we decided to make health care a for-profit industry. Because once we decide it's a good idea to let the free market dictate health care, that leads to the scenario you described: an executive in a boardroom deciding his first priority is to the shareholders, not the people who buy policies and trust that those policies are going to protect them when they get sick.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
The problem is that this is our moment, this is our time (as our President once said). I lived through health reform failing in the 90's and it took over 10 years to get another opportunity. This is our opportunity for a public plan. We won't have the opportunity next year. People will say health reform was done and when people are unhappy, they will say the Democrats screwed up. Then nobody will want to ever talk about a public option again just like nobody wants to talk about single payer after it failed in the 90's.
I work every day with people who are underinsured. People who have insurance but can't pay their hospital bills. People who have insurance but skip pills because they can't afford their medications. They are underinsured because their employers won't pay for good coverage. It sickens me every single day and I don't think the Senate Bill will do anything for them.
10/08/09
At least it puts the thing up to a referendum. Dunno, I'm undecided about this, but my guess is it's better than nothing.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09