<![CDATA[Jezebel: karen yampolsky]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: karen yampolsky]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/karenyampolsky http://jezebel.com/tag/karenyampolsky <![CDATA[Jane Pratt Fails To Reinvent Herself As A Sex Object]]> Um, note to Jane Pratt: the Playboy thing? Kinda been done! I mean, just off the top of my head there's your BFF Drew Barrymore, and Gloria Steinem, who kind of invented the whole edgy women's magazine stunt when she became a Playboy bunny. Anyway, so Jane Magazine founder Jane Pratt showed up to the set of Playboy's Sirius radio show last Thursday for bunny tryouts and apparently was given the whole "Jane, you've got a body for radio" speech.

No seriously, they said she wasn't tan enough or something. Though judging from that old pic of Gloria in her bunny suit, the tan is just another way idealized standards of beauty have gotten more unattainable over the years. In other news, Pratt's ex-assistant Karen Yampolsky did something slightly more original than trying out to be a Playboy Bunny and wrote a thinly-veiled tell-all about her experiences at the magazine (I actually read this) which she tells Rush & Molloy she wrote on her work computer:

"I think the Conde Nast executives forgot I was still there, so I used their computers to write about their magazine folding."
She could have stolen some un-retouched Vogue cover photos while she was at it and saved herself the trouble of actually writing a book, but then we wouldn't have known about that awesome schoolmarmy managing editor with the coke problem. So, uh, thanks!]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Two Bitches Who Left 'Jane' — Er, 'Jill' — To Die]]> Meet Eva Dillon and Mary Berner, the two ex-Conde Nast publishers some people think are responsible for the downfall of Jane, the women's magazine that never quite managed to be what anyone wanted it to be but tried a lot harder than Glamour. The demise of Jane had been almost assured since Jane Pratt herself, the beloved/flaky founding editor of Sassy magazine, was forced from the magazine named for her in a nasty drama thinly fictionalized in the book Falling Out Of Fashion, which we recently read, and if anyone thinks Eva and Mary — or, ahem, "Liz Alexander and Ellen Cutter" — were the biggest problem with Jane, author and ex-Pratt assistant Karen Yampolsky seems to. In the book Liz and Ellen are ginormous Stepford-y bitches who may be gay for one another. And so much more!

They lie to their superiors about their circulation numbers and they make two sales calls on days their gracious editor makes twelve. They're rude to restaurant servers and they install their coke-addicted ex-subordinates in key editorial functions at the magazine. They spend most of their time jockeying and playing political games within "Nestrom Publications" and the rest of it going to fancy restaurants. But worst they don't really seem to understand at all what Jill — which is to say, Jane — is about. They don't care about pop culture. They don't care about indie rock. They try to woo all the wrong advertisers — a cokehead diva designer named "Graciella D'Alessandro," for instance — by forcing the Jane staff to write stories about them.

Falling Out Of Fashion is certainly not a tome of nuance or um much literary merit, but it highlights the unending problem of magazine publishing, which is why we're so obsessed with it: is it the fault of writers, or sales people, to sell a magazine? If producing a publication that is smart fails, is it the fault of the readers, or the advertisers? Was Jane itself too smart? Or too stupid?

This will um not be the last you hear from us on this topic.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276344&view=rss&microfeed=true