juliendys - Jezebel

posts about #juliendys more →
The Costume Institute Has No Clothes

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

Sukie in the Graveyard
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
When one is busy romanticizing what fashion and modeling once was, they forget to consider what it is now. What it will be.

This exhibit seemed to be so much about showing the history of fashion. What there anything in the exhibit to communicate how each model influenced the artist? Their personalities, likes, dislikes, attitudes or just damn (sound it out) "jua de vie" (cause I can't spell it, let alone even begin to start). HOW did the model muse? They don't just stand there. You CANNOT tell me that Veruschka just Stood there and that photo came out.

Also, that ring belt IS the outfit. Fail. Super Fail.

I'm sorry it sucked. Let's make a better one.
Reply

Baroness
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
Beautifully written, I'm sorry it was a disappointment. The soundtracks, graffiti, unlit cigarettes- wow what sorry props. As you said, it's hard to fail with some stunning, classic fashion photography.
Reply

Baroness was starred Baroness was unstarred

tonightineed is actually Mrs. Ziegler-Spock
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
It sounds so underwhelming, and for that I am quite sad :(
Reply

rightorwrong
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
Sounds lame. Too bad, it should have been great. Both the Costume Institute and Islamic Art have been missing for years. I hope someone with influence is paying attention. I'll be seeing it on Saturday and Sunday - my usual deathmarch and art appreciation weekend.
Reply

rightorwrong was starred rightorwrong was unstarred

hfree
05/08/09

@rightorwrong: The Islamic Art galleries are being rennovated as part of the same project as the Greek and Roman galleries. They haven't been forsaken, I promise. I've seen some of the plans and it will be lovely when it's finally finished.
Reply

hfree was starred hfree was unstarred

hfree
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
I still think this was an odd choice for an exhibit in an art museum in the way they are presenting it. If the point is model as muse and concentrates as much on the photographers as the designers, then the clothes are almost secondary. It seems like this would have worked much better as a photography exhibit. The Avedon show at the Met a few years back was fantastic, as was the David Bailey "Birth of the Cool" show in the UK in 2001. Both shows seemed to say more about the relationship between photographer and subject than this show. And if they left out Alaia then it really has nothing to do with model and designer. I usually really enjoy the Costume Institute shows, an included entries in my masters thesis about "Dangerous Liasons" and "Anglomania", but this one and the superheroes show last year just missed so badly. Why can't they stick to the small shows in the basement galleries? Those are always intriguing and well curated.

P.S. on the blank mannequins. I don't know if they are using them in this show, but the mannequins they use in the main Costume Institute basement galleries are based on Christy Turlington (both facially and in body proportions).
Reply

hfree was starred hfree was unstarred

Sandicomm
05/08/09

@hfree: Superheroes was okay, but they could have done so much more: gender roles, power dynamics, current state of the comic book industry. Instead it was all, "Hey, look, brightly colored body suit. IT MUST BE A SUPERHERO." Please. The exhibit could have been so much better.

The only exhibits that I saw recently that I loved was the Poiret exhibit and the Nan Kempner exhibit. But it seems like sponsors and donors (like Ms. Wintour) have really gained control of the Institute. The quality of the exhibits has really gone downhill. Poor Harold Koda.
Reply

Sandicomm was starred Sandicomm was unstarred

hfree
05/08/09

@Sandicomm: I'm hoping that the acquisition of the Brooklyn Museum's collection will breath some new life into the Institute. Something to shake things up.
Reply

hfree was starred hfree was unstarred

Aesop's Foibles. YES.
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
.....At least no one's jumping. Right? That's good!
Reply

Fate'sBitch
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
Um, that 1980 Veruschka is Amazing. I want it poster-sized and framed on my wall, like now.
Reply

Fate'sBitch was starred Fate'sBitch was unstarred

Fate'sBitch
05/08/09

@Fate'sBitch: blerg, 1968.
Reply

Fate'sBitch was starred Fate'sBitch was unstarred

milominderbinder
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
the second picture looks so much like man ray's photographs of lee miller i think it was meant as an homage to surrealist photography
Reply

milominderbinder was starred milominderbinder was unstarred

Fate'sBitch
05/08/09

@milominderbinder: I agree, I immediately thought of Nude Bent Forward when I saw it.

[www.culture24.org.uk]
Reply

Fate'sBitch was starred Fate'sBitch was unstarred

maneki neko
05/08/09

In reply to The Costume Institute Has No Clothes
The second photo is sort of epic in its objectification/dehumanization.
Reply

maneki neko was starred maneki neko was unstarred

Goethewritesdrivel
05/08/09

@maneki neko: Try 'glorification of perfect form'...
Reply

Goethewritesdrivel was starred

Flackette Goes Retro
05/08/09

@Goethewritesdrivel: I'll go 50/50 on that one. It's striking and gorgeous, but I was a bit disturbed.
Reply

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#juliendys

Jezebel

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel

The Costume Institute Has No Clothes

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment