I remain shocked at some of the jaw-smackingly obtuse assumptions in the "Women need to be assertive and ask for things" idea, namely that women are somehow unable to grasp social and workplace dynamics and how things are, or that they have no idea how to come up with a framework of risk.
Seriously, one could ask their husband to do more domestic labor so that they can do better at corporate life. What if he says no, or does a deliberately crappy job and blames it on his possession of testicles? What if he does it for a month and then is like, "now it's your turn" (to do 90% of the work instead of the 75% you did for a month)? If you get rid of him, you get lectured by well-meaning people about how THEY came up with a super-easy system of asking and now their husband does "almost half" of the work, they have great sex three times a week now, and little Madison is going to private school and they're getting a housekeeper with the money they earned from Special Snowflake's Simple Method of Just Asking, and anyone who can't master Special Snowflake's Simple Method isn't *really* a feminist, but a "victim" who revels in it and probably hates her husband for being fun and more successful.
Yeah, I don't know why women wouldn't be assertive and ask for things when the above path is not just possible, but likely. Oh, wait... #joannelipman
With feminist articles and responses like this, I feel like women are actually trying not to understand each other. The original article was not as coherent and through as it could have been, but it really wasn't so bad. That sense of humor bit that people are criticizing? Her Martha Stewart example showed that she meant a sense of humor about life, not about misogyny.
Pogrebin's response is what I don't like. "Paradoxically, she confesses that she both 'took equality for granted' and 'looked derisively at the women’s liberation movement,' whose rebels and activists she dismisses with the hoary stereotype, 'strident, humorless, shrill women.'" - Um, there's not actually anything paradoxical about this. This is how many young women think of feminism. The lives of younger feminists are very different from those of older feminists; could we at least make some effort to understand where the other group is coming from? #joannelipman
@jenji: I'm approving this comment sort of guardedly because while I believe you are making this comment in good faith I can see this going somewhere bad. Don't kill me mods.
What I think is important to note here is that (a) how younger women "think of feminism" may be of historical interest, but philosophically it's not really that interesting a question - if what younger women think is an inaccurate description of what older feminists themselves, then no, I don't really know that the older feminists owe younger ones a duty of understanding when they are themselves being unfairly characterized; (b) it is, in general, my experienced that even those young feminists who cling to wave terminology and generational divide tend to be among the least informed about the history of feminism. We think our arguments are new, but the movement has been having them for forty years or more, which almost anyone could figure out by, y'know, actually reading some feminism.
I'm a young-ish woman, but it chaps my ass that younger women tend to be so obviously eager, like immature teenagers, to be iconoclastic about a feminist history they obviously barely understand. #joannelipman
@PilgrimSoul: I'm annoyed that she got a forum like the NYT to publish her adolescent musings on reinventing feminism. And I'm 21. I feel like most women who "discover" feminism mostly on their own (without taking classes in history and theory and/or without being raised on the ideology) go through this "awkward phase", so to speak. They make tone-deaf statements and draw numbskulled conclusions, much like, well, teenagers. Eventually they will realize that their experience is not unique or special.
Or maybe I'm reaching because this woman sounds like me at 15. #joannelipman
@PilgrimSoul: Yeah, you're right that it's not so hard to educate oneself about feminism. Since I can't argue with that, I looked back at Lipman's article to try and defend her, but it's kind of worse than I remembered. I really do think her points are being misunderstood, but her writing is so unclear that the misunderstanding is really Lipman's fault anyway.
I maintain that there's no paradox, and the misuse just kills me. #joannelipman
@jenji: Honestly, I'm tired of trying to make an effort to understand where others are coming from when they seem incapable of doing the same for me. #joannelipman
"Hey! I have a new idea! Women need to be assertive and ask for things!" is the feminist equivalent of "You know, sizes were different in the 1950's." #joannelipman
I have asked for both raises and promotions, and in some cases have gotten them, and in some cases have not. But sadly, it was only after threatening to involve the EEOC in an equal pay issue that my admittedly misogynistic boss took my vagina seriously. Women can be raised to know their worth, understand their abilities, and assert themselves as equals, but it will not be until men are raised to value equality that Equal Rights will be a true reality. #joannelipman
While I generally agree with Pogrebin and I understand her frustration with the article, I don't think Lippman's disrespect for old guard feminism is the heart of the issue.
I think the post yesterday was much more in tune with the problematic nature of the piece. And it's a little less knee-jerk rebuttal and more of a measured analysis. I would nominate Anna to write a letter to the editor but writing letters every time the NYT published something obnoxious or ridiculous would probably be a full time job in and of itself. #joannelipman
I never understood why other people thought I should find misogyny so amusing....I have a sense of humor. It goes hand in hand with my strong sense of self-worth which stops me from laughing at people belittling me. #joannelipman
I was terrified of 'being a girl'. Overpriced handbags would chase me down the street, laundry held no joy for me and my dreams were haunted by varying shades of magenta. But then I embraced the fact that the hunger in my ovaries could only be sated by chocolate, cleaning products and sharing weight loss tips wit my girlfriends and now all my gender problems were over. #joannelipman
As a non-agressive person I'm so glad for the point-out that being more masculine is not liberating to everyone. I don't want to push and shove to get what I deserve, and if I have to, I'd rather work for a different company, or focus on something other than my career... which, as an artist, doesn't mean giving up what I love, just doing it regardless of the money/recognition, or lack thereof.
As a teenager, I spent so much time and energy trying to prove that I was as cool as the boys, that I could drink like them, laugh like them, talk like them, so that I wouldn't be seen as a sexual object, or weak, which at the time seemed synonymous with feminine. Now I know I deserve respect for my feminine qualities as well as my masculine ones. I like to say that if it's difficult to be vulnerable or communicate, it is braver and more admirable than sucking it up... and so on.
This is an excellent piece of feminist journalism. Good job! I especially liked your point about changing women for the workplace and changing the school system for boys. I've never thought of it laid out in such succinct terms before, and I really think that parallel can open up the conversation of the way women are treated as individuals who need to adjust themselves for men, when the system doesn't work for them, but as a class when it suits the dominant paradigm (like how women are better caregivers and are therefore in charge of baby-raising).
I made my boss give me a promotion and a raise years ago. But no one is going to consider that when writing a trend piece or telling women what their problem is.
This problem has haunted me a lot this past weekend. I played in a War Hammer tournament (yes, I am a nerd), in which I was the only woman. The other players ignored me, took my rule book without asking then refused to return it, complained about my presence/playing and refused to shake my hand at the end of the match.
I think men are the ones that need to change. They berate women for being too different or for not competing in the same spheres as men, but then when we do, they turn a blind eye or exclude us.
This article and my experience have taught me something at least: the problem isn't that women don't seek promotions or live outside gender norms, it's that men (aka the ones with the power) ignore us when we do. #joannelipman
Ummm... didn't her magazine feature a big 'ol story about big ol' lady-hating "genius" Dov Charney? So.... make that 4 ways not to solve sexism.
I love Anna for her classy assumption that Lipman is trying to "genuinely trying to address the problems women face," but having read the piece I'm left wondering how genuine her attempt really was. There is a little too much blame-shifting for Portfolio's failure, and a bit too much emphasis on her own "legginess" (at least one mention of which seems now to have been invented). Like this idiot [jezebel.com] she seems a little too eager to make it clear to the reader that she has the man-stamp of approval, while kvetching about double standards and a lack of progress. If this is what she means by not being afraid to be a girl... no thanks. #joannelipman
@KikiCanuck: She's trying to assuage feelings of guilt in guys. 'Don't worry boys, sisters are doing it to themselves! If they really wanted that job, they'd ask for it. Even if they weren't at that golf game where its existence was being discussed. And even if they were accused of being greedy when they asked for a raise.' #joannelipman
I'm kind of getting annoyed by the acidity of some of the comments here. The Op-Ed piece is not well-written. That doesn't mean it's sexist. A woman who combatted sexism and reached the top of a male-dominated field offering some generic advice to other women is not the same as "Telling women what to do" or "Blaming women for sexism." It's all good advice: be confident and go after what you want, have a sense of humor, don't think of 'feminine' things as bad just because they're 'feminine.' I understand that the "sense of humor" language often comes from misogynists dismissing feminists, but that's clearly NOT WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE.
Advising women on what they can do to improve their situation is NOT THE SAME as blaming them for their situation. I can say to you, "Don't accept a drink from a stranger, it's not safe" without blaming or criticizing the rape victims who've been drugged that way. It's not just about telling society to improve, to look out for us. We can be active participants. We HAVE to be. #joannelipman
The best advice I've read since I became "politically conscious" was an article called something like "notes to an activist," and #1 on the list was "have a sense of humor." It doesn't mean "laugh at sexist jokes," or "excuse bad behavior," but the gist is that being an activist is hard, long-term, and the victories are few and far between. It means "learn to laugh off things when getting wound up about them won't do any good." There's a lot of terrible sexist (racist, classist, ablist, etc) shit going on in the world, and if you're going to avoid burnout, cynicism, or sheer panic, you have to accept your limitations, pick your battles, and find a way to not let yourself be dragged down by things you can't change. The easiest way to do that it to have a sense of humor.
I didn't get the Martha Stewart thing, either. But that lesson has made all the difference for me, not just as a feminist, but as a semi-neurotic human being. #joannelipman
@LittleDogLaughed: While I agree that having a sense of humor is essential, the problem with this is 1) She assumes women aren't already told to 'lighten up' or 'get a sense of humor' every single time they find something offensive. Who gets to decide when they get to be offended or when they laugh it off?, and 2) Who gets to decide what's funny and what isn't? #joannelipman
@Pizza!Pizza!Pizza!: She doesn't tell people WHAT they should find funny, and she doesn't say that women DON'T have a sense of humor--the example she cites is in fact a woman (even if it makes no sense). #joannelipman
10/27/09
Seriously, one could ask their husband to do more domestic labor so that they can do better at corporate life. What if he says no, or does a deliberately crappy job and blames it on his possession of testicles? What if he does it for a month and then is like, "now it's your turn" (to do 90% of the work instead of the 75% you did for a month)? If you get rid of him, you get lectured by well-meaning people about how THEY came up with a super-easy system of asking and now their husband does "almost half" of the work, they have great sex three times a week now, and little Madison is going to private school and they're getting a housekeeper with the money they earned from Special Snowflake's Simple Method of Just Asking, and anyone who can't master Special Snowflake's Simple Method isn't *really* a feminist, but a "victim" who revels in it and probably hates her husband for being fun and more successful.
Yeah, I don't know why women wouldn't be assertive and ask for things when the above path is not just possible, but likely. Oh, wait... #joannelipman
10/27/09
Painfully, painfully true. I think I love you. #joannelipman
10/27/09
Pogrebin's response is what I don't like. "Paradoxically, she confesses that she both 'took equality for granted' and 'looked derisively at the women’s liberation movement,' whose rebels and activists she dismisses with the hoary stereotype, 'strident, humorless, shrill women.'" - Um, there's not actually anything paradoxical about this. This is how many young women think of feminism. The lives of younger feminists are very different from those of older feminists; could we at least make some effort to understand where the other group is coming from? #joannelipman
10/27/09
What I think is important to note here is that (a) how younger women "think of feminism" may be of historical interest, but philosophically it's not really that interesting a question - if what younger women think is an inaccurate description of what older feminists themselves, then no, I don't really know that the older feminists owe younger ones a duty of understanding when they are themselves being unfairly characterized; (b) it is, in general, my experienced that even those young feminists who cling to wave terminology and generational divide tend to be among the least informed about the history of feminism. We think our arguments are new, but the movement has been having them for forty years or more, which almost anyone could figure out by, y'know, actually reading some feminism.
I'm a young-ish woman, but it chaps my ass that younger women tend to be so obviously eager, like immature teenagers, to be iconoclastic about a feminist history they obviously barely understand. #joannelipman
10/27/09
Or maybe I'm reaching because this woman sounds like me at 15. #joannelipman
10/27/09
I maintain that there's no paradox, and the misuse just kills me. #joannelipman
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
"Congratulations! You're the 1,500,000th person to say that!" #joannelipman
10/27/09
10/27/09
I think the post yesterday was much more in tune with the problematic nature of the piece. And it's a little less knee-jerk rebuttal and more of a measured analysis. I would nominate Anna to write a letter to the editor but writing letters every time the NYT published something obnoxious or ridiculous would probably be a full time job in and of itself. #joannelipman
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
"Don’t pay me half of what I deserve, and don’t call me "doll" either.
The two go hand in hand and always did."
(applauds!)
10/27/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
As a teenager, I spent so much time and energy trying to prove that I was as cool as the boys, that I could drink like them, laugh like them, talk like them, so that I wouldn't be seen as a sexual object, or weak, which at the time seemed synonymous with feminine. Now I know I deserve respect for my feminine qualities as well as my masculine ones. I like to say that if it's difficult to be vulnerable or communicate, it is braver and more admirable than sucking it up... and so on.
10/26/09
Thank you! #joannelipman
10/26/09
Guess I'll never rise to the top. #joannelipman
10/26/09
This problem has haunted me a lot this past weekend. I played in a War Hammer tournament (yes, I am a nerd), in which I was the only woman. The other players ignored me, took my rule book without asking then refused to return it, complained about my presence/playing and refused to shake my hand at the end of the match.
I think men are the ones that need to change. They berate women for being too different or for not competing in the same spheres as men, but then when we do, they turn a blind eye or exclude us.
This article and my experience have taught me something at least: the problem isn't that women don't seek promotions or live outside gender norms, it's that men (aka the ones with the power) ignore us when we do. #joannelipman
10/26/09
I love Anna for her classy assumption that Lipman is trying to "genuinely trying to address the problems women face," but having read the piece I'm left wondering how genuine her attempt really was. There is a little too much blame-shifting for Portfolio's failure, and a bit too much emphasis on her own "legginess" (at least one mention of which seems now to have been invented). Like this idiot [jezebel.com] she seems a little too eager to make it clear to the reader that she has the man-stamp of approval, while kvetching about double standards and a lack of progress. If this is what she means by not being afraid to be a girl... no thanks. #joannelipman
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
Advising women on what they can do to improve their situation is NOT THE SAME as blaming them for their situation. I can say to you, "Don't accept a drink from a stranger, it's not safe" without blaming or criticizing the rape victims who've been drugged that way. It's not just about telling society to improve, to look out for us. We can be active participants. We HAVE to be. #joannelipman
10/26/09
The best advice I've read since I became "politically conscious" was an article called something like "notes to an activist," and #1 on the list was "have a sense of humor." It doesn't mean "laugh at sexist jokes," or "excuse bad behavior," but the gist is that being an activist is hard, long-term, and the victories are few and far between. It means "learn to laugh off things when getting wound up about them won't do any good." There's a lot of terrible sexist (racist, classist, ablist, etc) shit going on in the world, and if you're going to avoid burnout, cynicism, or sheer panic, you have to accept your limitations, pick your battles, and find a way to not let yourself be dragged down by things you can't change. The easiest way to do that it to have a sense of humor.
I didn't get the Martha Stewart thing, either. But that lesson has made all the difference for me, not just as a feminist, but as a semi-neurotic human being. #joannelipman
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09