I just read "Babylon by Bus" over the weekend, and I HIGHLY recommend it - its about two guys who kind of wandered into Iraq in 2004 and wound up working for US Gov. Its completely true (apparently), and provides a really disturbing view into how badly things were managed then. Also, its an incredibly easy read, if, like me, your head is imploding from textbooks. They don't get into women's rights, at all, but it was still a really interesting view into the incompetence of the entire situation.
And let's not forget the issue that underscores the trafficking problem, which is that it flourishes in places where there are military bases and installations. This is the horrible lesson that we had to (and haven't) learn after Bosnia, Korea and Vietnam.
I'm sure that it's just me being naive or under-informed, but if the U.S. State Department knows about the sex trafficking and acknowledges that the Iraqi government is ignoring it, why are we not doing anything to prevent it? If the war really is about rooting out terrorism, why isn't our country actively trying to improve the lives of Iraqis, thereby improving our image?
@sequinsandgin: Rape and sexual slavery are consistently present to military invasions and states of war. the fucking UN had to "try" to stop their own staff from helping themselves to the underage prostitutes who set up camps in occupied areas in Africa.
I'm sure there is a stigma there about mental illness so I would assume that people aren't completely honest in surveys like this and the number is actually higher. It must be so difficult to be in an area where treatment isn't available and that can make you even more depressed.
@Miss Scarlett in the Hall with a Revolver.: Also I would like to say there is stigma in most places about mental illness (even in the US) so I'm not picking on Iraq specifically.
On Saturday, Time also reported that women's rights in Iraq have actually regressed since the fall of Saddam Hussein and sex trafficking is now rampant in the country.
Strange but true. Though he was an evil dictator, Saddam's regime was one of the most secular in the Middle East. This article is interesting.
@VivianDarkbloom: I always appreciated the irony that we made the one 'safest' places in regards to Al Qaeda and the Taliban into an extremist hotbed. Because there was absolutely no advantage to having a psycho secular dictator immediately adjacent to the most psycho of extremist Muslim dictators.
@battleaxonista: I remember a precious few voices trying to be heard on that point before the war started. Far too many people just couldn't comprehend what was being said. It was so obvious that too many people in positions of power just couldn't quite grasp the fact that there are actually differences among the people in the region.
This is kind of cool. I'm not too sure if it was Marx or Engels that kind of said it first (and at this point in my degree, I no longer care), but isn't the position of women within a society a good yardstick by which to measure that society's 'civilisation' or whatever? Well, I sure fucked that reference up, but this is a nice thing to hear about, nonetheless.
03/09/09
Also, its an incredibly easy read, if, like me, your head is imploding from textbooks.
They don't get into women's rights, at all, but it was still a really interesting view into the incompetence of the entire situation.
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
What point are you trying to make? At first glance, this comment is disgusting.
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
Strange but true. Though he was an evil dictator, Saddam's regime was one of the most secular in the Middle East. This article is interesting.
[www.hrw.org]
03/09/09
03/09/09
12/02/08
And look, their pay gap is less than ours! (83 cents on the dollar. If I did the math right, that is. I'm just a girl).
12/02/08
12/02/08