<![CDATA[Jezebel: io9]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: io9]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/io9 http://jezebel.com/tag/io9 <![CDATA[ Why Are There So Few Female Scientists? ]]> scientist051308.jpgSylvia Ann Hewlett is an economist and founding president of the Center for Work-Life Policy in New York. She also heads the gender and policy program at Columbia University. On Sunday, a piece she penned was printed in the Financial Times; it concerned a study on which she is the co-author, and it deals with women in the science, engineering and technology fields. The study, which will be published next month by the Harvard Business Review , shows that 41% of highly qualified specialists on the lower rungs of corporate career ladders in these areas in the US are female. But! 52% of highly qualified women working for science, engineering and technology companies voluntarily leave their jobs, driven out by hostile work environments and extreme job pressures. A sexist culture drives more than half of qualified women away.

While feminist blog The F Word wonders if the study is a bit simplistic, Catherine Price writes on Salon: "Many U.S. science, engineering or technology companies are complaining about an overall lack of American talent — a situation that will only get worse if the Bureau of Labor Statistics is correct in its prediction that from 2006 to 2016 jobs in these fields will grow 'five times faster than other sectors.'" Are we regressing to a time where science and technology are fields solely for men? Do we need more women like award-winning neuroscientist Susan Greenfield, whose delightful profile in the Independent is worth taking a moment to read. ("Many people like downhill skiing, or dancing, or wine, or sex, or food," says Greenfield. "Up until now, [pleasure seeking] has always been part of our lives but a polar opposite to seeking meaning. I fear we are shifting too much in favour of the literal, the hedonistic, the here and now, and losing meaning, context and content in favor of process... There's no point of living life if it's not fun.")

But part of the problem could be the image that scientists have in our collective unconscious. Researchers have found that the stereotype of mathematicians as geeks discourages students from studying math. A study by the Institute for Policy Studies in Education at the London Metropolitan University discovered:

Nearly all participants, both math-friendly students and those who steer clear of equations, think of a mathematician as a white male with white hair, who is obsessed with the number-laden subject to the exclusion of any social life. For instance, participants labeled Albert Einstein and John Nash (portrayed in the movie "A Beautiful Mind") as lacking social skills and as weird or not normal.
So you already know what I'm going to ask you: If we're living in a culture where little girls think being called "sexy" is the ultimate compliment, where girls may have damaged mental health from advertising and media, where students of both genders don't want to study math because it is geeky, what does our future look like? As the rest of the world makes leaps and bounds in science, engineering and technology, we're perfecting a reality television. (Oh, and don't forget: The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Canada, France, Iceland, The Netherlands, Bangaldesh, Ireland, Poland, Liberia and Argentina have all had female presidents or prime ministers.)


Focus On The Female Talent In The Backyard [Financial Times]
Sexist culture drives Women Out Of Science [Times Of London]
Sexist culture drives Women Out Of Science [The F Word]
Where Are All The Women Going? [Salon]
Susan Greenfield: The Girl With All The Brains [Independent]
Mathematicians Still Seen as Einsteins [Live Science]

[That picture is not of Sylvia Ann Hewlett or Susan Greenfield. It's a Russian post doctoral student working with DNA samples. Finding an image of a female scientist was difficult. Google image "doctor" and you get tons of images of men in white coats and a few images of female porn stars dressed as nurses to "play" doctor. Go figure.]

]]>
Tue, 13 May 2008 18:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ May <i>Vogue</i> Visits The Future And The Future Is Missing A Clavicle ]]> just-vogue-cover.jpgYou just CAN'T LOOK AWAY, can you folks? The May Vogue is ...just...that...breathtaking. A staggering work of backbreaking Photoshop! Featuring none other than Jezebel's sweetheart Gwyneth Paltrow. Oh Gwyneth! Never have you so resembled a Bratz doll on barbiturates! And how sweet that you take such pains in the text to make yourself out to be so very very down-to-earth. You've gone entire days without a nanny! You own an article of clothing from the Gap! Such a simple, simple life you lead! Well anyway, Plum Sykes seems to approve. And you, Plum! How distinctly we remember someone in Bergdorf Blondes musing that she couldn't get a DVD player because people who have DVD players have no place to go. Quaint, right? (Like you could visit Middle Earth or the future without a DVD player, Plum.) Anyway, we rewrite the most nerd convention-friendly Vogue ever printed after the jump.





coverliesvogue-may-08.jpg


Earlier: French (Photo Retouchers) Don't Let Famous Women Get Fat












]]>
Tue, 06 May 2008 14:40:00 EDT cheryl http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387701&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ LOL<i>Vogue</i>: Superhero Photo Shoot Gets Super Stoopid ]]> Clearly a replicant.The May issue of Vogue is really weird. From the RoboGwyneth cover and interior spread (do Vogue readers care a whit about Iron Man?) to the fact that Smallville's Tom Welling (???) is in a photo shoot, it's all kinds of creeptastic. This has something to do with the fact that this month, The Costume Institute's spring show is about superhero style, and Vogue always considers the opening night shindig to be the gala of the year. Anyway, there's a photo story, shot by Craig McDean, that was begging for the LOL treatment. (Familiarize yourself here.) These "superheroes" in evening gowns may not be able to save your life, but they can try and distract you from the drudgery of your day. We're puttin werds on ur moddles, after teh jump.





LOLvogueREALONE043008.jpg

LOLVOGUETWO043008.jpg

LOLVOGUEthreeforrealnow0430.jpg

LOLvogueFOUR043008.jpg

LOLVOGUEFIVE043008.jpg

Earlier: I Can Has Jeetann? C'est LOLVogue En Faux Français
LOLVogue: Teh Hare Toss & Teh Bunnee Hop
LOLLost: Srsly, Guiz, Dis Izland Is Weeerd
LOLVogue: Tard Moddles & Bahlinceeyagga
Mon Dieu! C'est French LOLVogue: Shoulders, Champagne and Cigarettes
LOL'Vogue': Scarves, Silverware & Scooters
LOLVogue: Starving Models & Marionettes

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 13:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385901&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Scientists Create Computer That Can Comprehend "Beauty" ]]> monalisa4408.jpgScientists at Tel Aviv University claim to have created a computer program that can recognize human attractiveness. Here's what they did: they had thirty men and women look at 100 images of young, white women and judge the "beauty" of each image. Then, according to EurekAlert, "Based on human preferences, the machine 'learned' the relation between facial features and attractiveness scores and was then put to the test on a fresh set of faces." The computer rankings turned out to be very similar to the rankings people gave, and so the scientists are surmising that the computer is "interpreting" beauty on a human level. On researcher, Amit Kagian, says "I believe that some kind of universal correctness to beauty exists in nature, an aesthetic interpretation of the universal truth. But because each of us is trapped with our own human biases and personalized viewpoints, this may detract us from finding the ultimate formula to a complete understanding of beauty."

These "personalized viewpoints" of beauty are what seemingly makes the world go 'round, but for people with body dysmorphic disorder, their overly personalized/distorted thoughts about their own looks often drive them to obsessive plastic surgery, eating disorders, and other bodily harm.

As pointed out in an article in the current issue of Scientific American, doctors used to think that body dysmorphic disorder (when a person becomes "pathologically preoccupied with an imagined or barely noticeable defect in his or her appearance") was caused by a combination of nature and nurture. As S.A. puts it, "Psychological factors such as low self-esteem, coupled with society's restrictive definition of physical beauty, are likely to play a role in the disorder." But more recently, psychiatrists and psychologists have found that people with BDD might have "unusually acute perceptual abilities," specifically an "overemphasis on visual details," which helps explain why they "worry so much about minuscule deviations in their features." Maybe so, but whether anyone is pathologically focused on details or robotically-concerned with making a model of "universal beauty," they're missing out on the more intangibly human aspects of attractiveness: a sexy laugh, a sparkling eye, a warm demeanor.

[Image via Mathemetician's Pictures.]

TAU Scientists Teach A Computer To Recognize Attractiveness In Women [EurekAlert!]
Imagined Ugliness [Scientific American, sub. req.]

]]>
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:20:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376305&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sci-Fi For Women: Marrying Your Vibrator ]]> Remember that South Park episode that spoofed that sci-fi, fanboy-jerk-off-material movie Heavy Metal? Here's a clip from the original, in which a woman has sex with a robot and decides to get married to it after "experiencing ecstasy with mechanical equipment." It's kinda NSFW due to naked cartoon breasts.


Earlier: South Park Takes A Trip To Heavy Metal

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:00:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373598&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear <i>Cosmo</i> Girl Hayden "<i>Heroes</i>" Panettiere: "Better To Be The Turtle Than The Hare" ]]> haydencosmo031308.jpgIt's almost spring, so it's probably fitting that Cosmopolitan has decided to put Heroes actress Hayden Panettiere on the cover of its April issue (right next to the words "SEX GENIUS" in 64-point type!). Not only is Panettiere a budding star — after she gets her first big, silver-screen role her handlers will no doubt go after the cover of the glossier, more respected Glamour — and a budding adult (she's just 18), but, according to graphologist Sheila Kurtz, she's got "buds of an imagination, but no apparent follow through." (Ouch?) After the jump, Kurtz weighs in on the actress' handwriting, as seen on the "Cosmo Quiz" accompanying Hayden's newly-released cover story.

haydencosmohandwriting.jpg

The overall slant of this writing is moderately to the left, an indication of a person who is somewhat introverted. Unless the writer knows you fairly well, you won't get close. It appears that there is little stress shown in the writing, and it's likely that even if somebody gets too close too fast, the writer will fend off and not erupt.

Letters are rounded, the sign of a methodical thinker who likes to take time and does not like to be rushed. No fast deadlines for this writer or she will tend to get scattered in her pursuits.

Writer's goals are alternately high enough to stretch for and low enough to pick off the ground. There are signs of initiative (takes action without prompting by others).

Thinking can be accelerated somewhat by the writer's intuition (indicated by spaces between letters). This writer has learned to skip over many of the logical building blocks of thought and reach, almost mysteriously, a conclusion that turns out to work. The writer has come to trust this gut thinking. Nonetheless, if this writer starts thinking too fast, a lot of confusion results (intertwined lines) that slows everything down again. Better for this writer to be the turtle than pretend to be the hare.

There are buds of an imagination, but no apparent follow through.

Good attention to small details. The writer's usual approach to things is frank and very direct.

The writer probably works well (or could) with her hands, perhaps in the mechanical realms such as carpentry, pottery, glass blowing..

Lines and letters are pressed close together and the e formations are constricted, all indications of a mind with many preconceptions that clog up the arteries to new ideas.

There are also indications of a person who usually tells the truth (as most of us may see it) and is steadfast and loyal to people and institutions she believes in.

Earlier: Heroes' Hayden Panettiere Is An American Everywoman
Cosmo Girl Rihanna: "Solitary & Self-Involved"
Decoding Cosmo Cover Girl Katie Heigl: "She Refuses To Waste Time With Convoluted Crap"
Cosmo Girl Hilary Duff: Intuitive, Practical And Younger Than She Looks
Cosmo Girl Beyonce Knowles: Detail-Oriented, Thoughtful, Possibly Power-Hungry
'Cosmo' Cover Girl Ali Larter: Self-Involved, Stubborn, Easily Distracted

Related: Sheila Kurtz [Graphology Consulting]

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:20:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367128&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do We Have The Ten Commandments Because Moses Was High On Ayahuasca? ]]> An Israeli religious scholar and professor of cognitive psychology is advancing the thesis that the Ten Commandments, the moral foundation of the religious faith that have guided billions and billions of people for thousands of years, were revealed that fateful night on Mt. Sinai because Moses was high. On what? (Wouldn't it have been awesome if it were Ecstasy? wouldn't that make for a great sequel to those hilarious "Religions of the World" T-shirts? Or better yet, one of those signs in bar bathrooms with like the "Zen guide to life" or whatever? I never remember the valuable things I learn from the posters in bar bathrooms. Except the thing about how you "forget 80% of what you learn every day." Anyway.) Anyway! Sooooo, Moses was high. The scholar, Benny Shanon, seems to think he experienced something like his own experiences on ayahuasca, the hallucinogenic brew indigenous to the Amazon beloved by such luminaries as Johnson & Johnson heiress Libet Johnson.

I am wont to believe him, having read the bestselling works of "Economic Hit Man" John Perkins, who clearly thought up his thesis of the world under the influence of ayahuasca. But what does it all mean?

That the Burning Bush was a hallucination, too? (Yes.) That religion is a fraud? (Duh!) That the moral codes we take for granted, chalking up to an amorphous mix of socialization and/or evolutionary biology and/or something resembling an innate human conscience was concocted under the influence of hallucinogens? THAT RELIGION IS LITERALLY THE OPIATE OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE TOO POOR FOR ACTUAL OPIATES???? Why yes! I mean, yeah yeah mood-altering substances bear responsibility for much of the world's bar violence/opportunistic adultery/convenience store theft. But, don't all the truly bad things happen at the hands of sober people and/or people newly off their meds? Yes they do. Is it to early for a drink? No it is not.

Moses Was High On Mt. Sinai [AFP}

]]>
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:00:38 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363611&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yes, Virgins, There <i>Is</i> A G-Spot! You Just May Need Some Injections To Fix Yours ]]> The G-spot. Is it possible we have never really discussed this apocryphal palace of erogoversy on Jezebel before? Hey, let's end that now. First, the news: the G-spot is not a myth invented by the dark alliance of Cosmo and your lazy high school boyfriend. No, it is real, scientists have confirmed this. (Okay, Italian scientists, but still.) But there is a catch! Not every woman appears to have one. (How long before Roger Ailes gives us exit polling on how the G-spot deficient demographic votes in elections?) Anyway, so here's the other G-tastic news: you can apparently have a collagen injection (a G-shot, of course!) that will make your G-spot more sensitive! You can apparently get one of these shots at a party. Just like Botulinum Toxin! (Just don't get the syringes mixed up!) How do you find out if you have one? And if you don't, can you get one, like with a kidney? (Kidding!) Answers after the jump!



Okay, so here's the first news. Basically what happened is a scientist found a bigger area of tissue between the urethra and the vagina among women who report vaginal orgasms.This would seem to jive with the idea that injecting the area with collagen can make any G-spot more sensitive, since collagen is, you know, "tissue." Now, other scientific G-spot experts claim this could just be due to the fact that women who report vaginal orgasms, um, work out that area more, and therefore the tissue is bigger on account of all the exercise, like with muscle. Could this explain why serious runners sometimes report spontaneous orgasms? Can you tell it's been fourteen years since my last biology class?? Fuck I'm old. Old and horny.

Ultrasound Nails Location Of Elusive G-Spot (Heh heh "nails") [New Scientist]
Vaginal Orgasm: Truth Or Myth [The F Word]

G-Shot Parties: A Shot At Better Sex?
[ABC News]

]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:40:00 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358834&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ I Have An Abusive Boyfriend, And He's Coming Home At 8 ]]> matthewfoxlost013108.jpgLet's just say you had an exciting, seductive, thrilling lover who mysteriously and secretively disappeared, leaving you with hundreds of unanswered questions. Eight months later, he's back. Do you give him an hour of your time? You do if he is a TV show, and if that TV show is Lost. Fans already know the deal: the ABC program is an exercise in exquisite torture, the primetime equivalent of an emotionally abusive relationship. What makes it abusive? Let us count the ways:
  • According to The National Domestic Violence Hotline, you may be in an emotionally abusive relationship if your partner (in this case, the show), tries to isolate you from family or friends. When you watch Lost, the world divides into two groups; those who also watch and those who don't. Even my own mother will be denied and ignored if she dares to call while I'm watching tonight. And heaven forbid if she asks, "What's the show about?"

  • The wellness site Third Age asks, Do you feel as if your partner keeps you dangling on a string? Does he or she seem to have all of the emotional control? Does this make your own life feel out of control? Yes, yes and yes! Lost leaves you dangling, controls emotions, makes you fall in love with foxy foxes, no-goodniks and heart-melters, muddles their backstories, confuses whether they are good or bad and then snatches them away from you just when you thought you could count on seeing them shirtless once a week.
  • Dr. Phil himself says a relationship might be abusive if your partner is making you afraid by using looks, gestures or actions. The black smoke is terrifying! So is Henry Gale/Ben Linus! So is the fact that people manifest things from their past — Kate's horse, Jack's dad? Another mark of the emotional abuser is if the person makes light of the abuse and doesn't take your concerns about it seriously. You think they listened when I begged, "Please don't kill Mr. Eko!"? No!
  • You're being abused if your partner does not want you to work. Lost wants me to spend all day cross-referencing conspiracy theories, watching secret videos that may or may not hold insight and reading Hurley's blog. I just know it.
  • Lastly, emotionally abusive partners are known for punishing by withholding affection. It's been eight months! As Emily Nussbaum says in New York Magazine today: "Basically, we're kind of like John Locke: Befriend us under false pretenses, steal our kidney, smash us through a window, toss us in a mass grave! You're still our daddy, and we'll follow you anywhere."
]]>
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:00:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351182&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Field Of Dreams ]]> Crop circles? So 10 years ago. The new phenomenon is sheep circles, which have reportedly emerged on a farm in Herefordshire, England. Most likely a hoax by someone with an active imagination (or a love of the film Black Sheep), but worth checking out nonetheless. (Click on the tag for full-size image.) [Daily Mail]

]]>
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:45:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348961&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We Have Liftoff: Sister Site i09 Launches To Much (Girl Geek) Fanfare ]]> io9010208.jpgAnxious about what the year 2008 will bring? What about 2070? Forward-focused Jezebels might want to head over to our new science-fiction sister blog, io9, which officially launches today. Described by editor Annalee Newitz as a pop-culture site in which she and her team of writers get to focus on "fantasies as well as realities in terms of what's going on in the future," the blog focuses on stuff we love — books, movies, Lost! — and stuff we don't, but mightspace porn, "how to shit in space". And you gotta love that half-creepy, half-cute as a button girl-with-implant avatar.

What Is An io9? [io9]
Related: Gawker Blasts Into Sci-Fi With New Blog, I09 [Wired]
Gawker Media Gets Strung Out On Sci-Fi [NY Times]

]]>
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:00:00 EST Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339379&view=rss&microfeed=true