"...If the standard turns out to be, for instance, hormone levels, and it is decided that one cannot exceed certain levels of testosterone to play in women's sports..."
i'm confused and fascinated by this approach. wouldn't then a hormone "baseline" be established, not just for women but men also? for example suppose a man doesn't have "enough" testosterone, or has "too much" estrogen compared to the accepted baseline?
would a woman with "too much" testosterone be allowed to compete against men? would a man with "too much" estrogen be allowed to compete against women? or would both groups wind up in some crazy limbo category where they could only compete against each other with similar non-conforming hormone levels?
I hope Butler is actively lobbying the IAFF and every other sports organization. The concept of standards for admission rather than a determination of sex is brilliant and will protect future athletes from the same pain.
I hope Mr. Opportunity has the opportunity to read those quotes, and then I hope he feels like a gigantic schmuck for saying Semenya should be grateful for what has happened to her.
My heart breaks at those quotes from Semenya. What a horrible thing to have to deal with. I hope all these people who demanded the testing are happy now.
The Daily Telegraph is not exactly known for its quality news content in this country. Its actually something of a joke really, and everytime I stumble upon it I feel stupider for the experience.
Either way, I just feel for the poor girl. Whatever her condition is, or whatever it should be called, can you imgine such a personal thing as your fucking gender being headline news all over the world?
After reading one whiny, one-sided post after another on this topic, I throw my hands up.
It is perfectly possible to respect intersex individuals AND support the IAAF in this case.
Moreover, if leaks are so terrible, Jezebel should have waited for the official report in November, instead of jumping at the chance to editorialize on this "rumor." (Like all the other "media.")
But she's already been denied the right to choose whether her medical information is made public.
--If you participate in competitive sports at the highest level, that's inevitable.
--What's more, the South African authorities bear a lot of responsibility for the extremely poor way in which this has been handled. They could have avoided this mess; it's not like the need for this test was sprung on them; they actively thwarted and manipulated the process after being contacted by the IAAF.
As in so many aspects of this case, the leaker clearly didn't consider Semenya's well-being before speaking out.
--Please grow up. The world doesn't follow the rules of the nation of Jezebel.
@Seeräuber Jenny: We're not surprised the media is intolerant and hateful darling. It has compared black people to apes in the past, it has hated women for gaining weight, etc, etc.
It's sad, however, that you don't think intersex people deserve any respect.
I just looked over a coworker's shoulder; she was laughing at something on one of the mean-boy gossip blogs (I will not add a link, for reasons that will become obvious). The post was about Caster, saying that "people like that" should be put in death camps. I said to my coworker, "Do you know what a death camp is?"
She pointed at the photo of Caster and said, "Yeah, but that's nasty. And it's just a joke."
Again, I said, "Do you know what a death camp is?"
But she brushed me off because I'm thirty and who cares what my old ass says, anyway.
So.
There is probably no winner in all of this. It is horrific that Castor Semenya's personal anatomy is posted all over the internet, all over the world, as if it's public information. I am saddened for the personal anguish she must have felt/is feeling over the poking and prodding and such insensitive questions of: "well, what *are* you?"
She most definitely should not have her medals taken away. She has done nothing malicious or of questionable intent. I feel like she must have had some questions about why she did not develop like conventional females with regards to a period, not even spotting or zero vaginal discharge, but she probably did not have the means, support, or forum to ask these questions.
Nevertheless, I am puzzled by all the statements that she should still be allowed to compete in female-only competitions. I understand that Semenya did absolutely nothing wrong and this is just her genetic disposition. But, she possesses testes. She possess a significant advantage above her competitors in terms of muscle strength, stamina, recovery time, pelvic structure, among others. It is not an equal and fair competition, if she were to compete with women who do not have the same biological dispositions. It doesn't mean that Semenya didn't/doesn't train excruciatingly hard, it doesn't negate her athleticism, it doesn't negate how she wishes to identify as a woman, and it doesn't negate her resilience. But I just don't understand how people can say that she should still compete with females, and still take the competitiveness seriously.
I hope she holds her head up high, is proud of all her tremendous hard work, and is able to move on. There are no clear-cut winners in this - Semenya's ought to step out of competing with females, though with no fault of her own. Her competitors may be in the books as less, by no fault of their own.
@RoswellFearbot: I couldn't agree with you more. She's obviously not at fault, but so many people here seem completely unwilling to entertain the issue of why if events are segregated by sex, it matters if you are intersex and have clear advantages conveyed by your genetic and hormonal composition.
I wouldn't have a problem with her keeping her medal. But I don't think she should be permitted to compete in women's events in the future if indeed she is found to be intersex and if she gets an unfair athletic edge as a result.
@RoswellFearbot: Well, then, where should she compete? Do we just go ahead and establish a field solely for intersex athletes? Or do we have her compete with the men, even though she has female parts? Where's the line? If you have ovaries, you compete with women, and if you have testes you compete with the men? But what if you have breasts and a uterus?
The only good thing I see coming out of this is that people might realize that sex does not exist in binary terms.
I want to write her a letter. . .we can all sign it. . . and tell Semenya that we are in awe of her athletic ability, her discipline in training, and her courage to compete on the world stage. And then I want to write a letter to all of those that don't think its "fair" for her to compete, or are sensationalizing her internal organs and chromosomes. I will tell them to suck their own preciously-unambiguous-genitals. And I would like to ask them the last time they did something productive or inspiring, or even the last time they supported their own body weight by getting out of their ergonomically designed computer chair (I'm not sure why I'm so angry today)
I am positively disgusted by the way that this information came out. I am a woman with a disorder of sex development (androgen insensitivity, complete) and am no athlete by any stretch of the imagination.
Assuming, as many are that AIS is what Semenya has, she would actually be at a distinct disadvantage when developing muscle strength. Androgens play a huge role in muscle development -- and her body would be immune to the actions of those androgens.
@pickles_in_my_tea: Not necessarily, though, I don't think, especially if she has partial androgen insensitivity, versus complete. If she has partial, the higher levels of testosterone (some of which the body *would* have been able to process), may still have given her advantages in muscle and physical development.
That I think is beside the point at this stage, though, since she is facing a huge potential shift in her identity, depending on how this is handled. Hopefully someone will get her some good, experienced counselors.
@pickles_in_my_tea: My almost 3 week old nephew is being tested for congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and in researching this condition, I was astounded to learn how profoundly it can affect the girls who have it --- female internally, but may appear male externally ---- why can't people understand that male/female isn't a simple delineation?
the other thing that's infuriating about all this is people mixing up gender and sex willy-nilly, and now on cnn they're referring to it as her "sexuality".
@flexanimous: That's just embarrassing, but not really surprising. The level of ignorance I've seen among journalists about matters like this is astounding.
So a lot of people (idiots) on my facebook friendlist are saying she must be banned because she has an unfair advantage, and this is pissing me off to no end because it makes it seem as if she didn't work hard, didn't put in time and effort, and wasn't 100% dedicated to her sport. Regardless of advantages if a athlete does not work hard to compete they won't be able to WIN. Taller swimmers have an advantage over shorter ones, muscular weightlifters have an advantage over nonmuscular weightlifters, tall basketball players have an advantage over shorter basketball players. I really don't get it. We all have advantages in some way shape and form. I can run faster than a lot of other people which is an advantage but does it mean I will automatically win? No I would give out of breath in most distance races. I just feel like people are reducing her talent to being purely genetic. Tiger Woods is a great golfer not because of some innate talent but because he works hard, same for Serena Williams. Sigh, this world is a cruel cruel place I tell you.
@PogoStick09: I definitely see what you're saying, and I have no idea if Semenya has any specific unfair advantages due to her alleged condition, but your analogy as written would mean that men should just compete against women, and there should be no segregation since some women have some advantages and can work hard.
But we all know if that were the case, there would never be women in the top tier (for example in the case of marathons, the most elite women are many minutes behind the most elite men).
@formergr: I understand there are fundamental differences two being a man and being a woman but I just feel like people are writing Caster off and just saying YUP SHE HAS A PENIS AND THAT'S AN ADVANTAGE which a penis in itself is not because I am pretty sure Steffi Graff could beat me in tennis. Sigh, just keep me in your thoughts I am taking this whole thing rather personally because my heart is pouring out for this young woman. I mean what's wrong with the world?
@formergr: Actually, once you get up into the ULTRA-marathon range, women actually are suspected to have an advantage. Due to the body fat content of women and level of endurance possible, the longer the distance, the more the gap between the top women and the top men closes. Once you get up to around 100 mile races, women are actually faster. Of course, they're aren't THAT many 100 mile races, sooooo....
@olivia2.0: Interesting, I had no idea!! And we all know women are tougher, anyway ;)
PogoStick09, you are definitely right that many people are writing her off without a nuanced understanding of the situation, very sad. Hopefully she can make it through this-- she'll need to be one tough girl...
I hate that this poor girl is being treated like an object of public study. Her "condition", if she has one, while interesting, is none of our business. Something about this whole thing is reminiscent to me of the turn of the last century when people who were considered "other" were put on display at World's Fairs and other venues: [en.wikipedia.org]
I also was not aware that hermaphrodite was a deragatory term, I will amend my vocabulary accordingly (not that it comes up a lot in day to day conversation).
11/23/09
i'm confused and fascinated by this approach. wouldn't then a hormone "baseline" be established, not just for women but men also? for example suppose a man doesn't have "enough" testosterone, or has "too much" estrogen compared to the accepted baseline?
would a woman with "too much" testosterone be allowed to compete against men? would a man with "too much" estrogen be allowed to compete against women? or would both groups wind up in some crazy limbo category where they could only compete against each other with similar non-conforming hormone levels?
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
09/11/09
Either way, I just feel for the poor girl. Whatever her condition is, or whatever it should be called, can you imgine such a personal thing as your fucking gender being headline news all over the world?
09/11/09
It is perfectly possible to respect intersex individuals AND support the IAAF in this case.
Moreover, if leaks are so terrible, Jezebel should have waited for the official report in November, instead of jumping at the chance to editorialize on this "rumor." (Like all the other "media.")
But it's all one big clusterfuck, isn't it?
09/11/09
--If you participate in competitive sports at the highest level, that's inevitable.
--What's more, the South African authorities bear a lot of responsibility for the extremely poor way in which this has been handled. They could have avoided this mess; it's not like the need for this test was sprung on them; they actively thwarted and manipulated the process after being contacted by the IAAF.
As in so many aspects of this case, the leaker clearly didn't consider Semenya's well-being before speaking out.
--Please grow up. The world doesn't follow the rules of the nation of Jezebel.
09/11/09
It's sad, however, that you don't think intersex people deserve any respect.
09/11/09
Sorry, honeybunch, you're clueless.
09/11/09
She pointed at the photo of Caster and said, "Yeah, but that's nasty. And it's just a joke."
Again, I said, "Do you know what a death camp is?"
But she brushed me off because I'm thirty and who cares what my old ass says, anyway.
So.
09/11/09
She most definitely should not have her medals taken away. She has done nothing malicious or of questionable intent. I feel like she must have had some questions about why she did not develop like conventional females with regards to a period, not even spotting or zero vaginal discharge, but she probably did not have the means, support, or forum to ask these questions.
Nevertheless, I am puzzled by all the statements that she should still be allowed to compete in female-only competitions. I understand that Semenya did absolutely nothing wrong and this is just her genetic disposition. But, she possesses testes. She possess a significant advantage above her competitors in terms of muscle strength, stamina, recovery time, pelvic structure, among others. It is not an equal and fair competition, if she were to compete with women who do not have the same biological dispositions. It doesn't mean that Semenya didn't/doesn't train excruciatingly hard, it doesn't negate her athleticism, it doesn't negate how she wishes to identify as a woman, and it doesn't negate her resilience. But I just don't understand how people can say that she should still compete with females, and still take the competitiveness seriously.
I hope she holds her head up high, is proud of all her tremendous hard work, and is able to move on. There are no clear-cut winners in this - Semenya's ought to step out of competing with females, though with no fault of her own. Her competitors may be in the books as less, by no fault of their own.
09/11/09
I wouldn't have a problem with her keeping her medal. But I don't think she should be permitted to compete in women's events in the future if indeed she is found to be intersex and if she gets an unfair athletic edge as a result.
09/12/09
The only good thing I see coming out of this is that people might realize that sex does not exist in binary terms.
09/11/09
09/11/09
Me neither until I read the Wikipedia entry when this came up a month ago.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Assuming, as many are that AIS is what Semenya has, she would actually be at a distinct disadvantage when developing muscle strength. Androgens play a huge role in muscle development -- and her body would be immune to the actions of those androgens.
This is a sad, sad result.
09/11/09
That I think is beside the point at this stage, though, since she is facing a huge potential shift in her identity, depending on how this is handled. Hopefully someone will get her some good, experienced counselors.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/12/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
But we all know if that were the case, there would never be women in the top tier (for example in the case of marathons, the most elite women are many minutes behind the most elite men).
09/11/09
09/11/09
Here's an interesting article:
[findarticles.com]
09/11/09
PogoStick09, you are definitely right that many people are writing her off without a nuanced understanding of the situation, very sad. Hopefully she can make it through this-- she'll need to be one tough girl...
09/11/09
I also was not aware that hermaphrodite was a deragatory term, I will amend my vocabulary accordingly (not that it comes up a lot in day to day conversation).