doesn't anybody understand? the goal of insurance companies is to find a way to prove everybody has something that can be categorized as a "pre-existing condition."
honestly i'd love if everybody in the u.s. just cancelled their insurance policies on the same day. now let's negotiate.
My insurance handler told me I would be denied insurance because I was in treatment for substance abuse last year. He basically advised me to lie on my application, telling me that they wouldn't check up on it unless I had some sort of relapse. If that happened, my policy would just be voided for lying--no restitution or anything.
The really screwed up part is that if I hadn't sought treatment, I would be insured...but I would probably be almost dead.
@steph3280: Your broker makes money when you enroll. Him telling you to lie insurance fraud. I know there have been legislators looking to stop restitution, but even if there is a law against it, if you knowingly commit fraud they could probably still go after you to pay past claims.
I'd contact your state or county and see if there are any local programs for people with pre-existing conditions. Some states have insurance pools for people with pre-ex conditions but they are often very expensive.
Sigh. I just KNEW Oklahoma would be on this list....
As a paramedic and RN, I was required to ask patients, especially female, specific questions about domestic violence when I was doing direct patient care. Now, I see I probably just fucked up their insurance coverage forever. Nice.
I read an article about this subject over the weekend. There are actually 8 states, according to the article, which allow this to happen. One of them happens to be the state I live in, Wyoming, which has a fairly high domestic violence rate. I don't understand the insurance companies' position and think this is utterly appalling. And I can't believe I live in a state that does that.
I knew this would happen! I knew it as soon as you told me that a computer model had been developed to determine how likely it is that abuse is to blame for what ails you.
Now, they'll start classifying weird injuries/ailments inside of categories in this "map."
"I have a migraine headache... can you honestly call that paranoid schizophrenia? I'm not the victim of domestic violence!!!"
With that logic (bear with me here), ski accidents are a "pre-existing" condition. I have to let the insurance company know that I leave the house and engage in dangerous pursuits. I use knives to cook, too.
@OneBigPear: Want to understand the true evil of insurance executives? Lawyers were never evil. The insurance companies just convinced you they were so they could blame malpractice cases for increasing medical costs.
There have been a series of articles in the Chicago Tribune on pre-existing conditions nightmares which basically detailed how insurance companies will comb through your medical files and find something/anything they can use as a basis to deny coverage for a high cost treatment. Even if that something is unrelated to the condition for which you are seeking coverage. (A youg girl who was diagnosed with celiac disease was denied coverage for all of the testing required to diagnose her because they found she had a history of headaches.) Anyone who thinks this country doesn't need healthcare reform is in denial.
@OldEnough2BYourMama: There's a segment on a recent-ish This American Life about that, too. The legislature is/was holding hearings with insurance execs because they think insurance companies deliberately make their forms too complicated for the average person to fill out properly, SO THAT when you need coverage they can find an "error" and deny your claims.
The article said that states don't prohibit defining domestic violence as a pre-existing condition. I didn't see any indication that insurance companies are doing that.
@remedios: I would be curious to know if any company would do this. I've never seen it, but I've only ever administered employer sponsored plans which tend to be fair (and expensive). In any case, how would the insurance company know? There is no diagnosis code for domestic violence as far as I know.
@remedios: I did a little search and it looks like some insurance companies do that. Although not recent, I saw references to studies in 1994 and 1998 that found specific insurance companies with such policies and at least one specific instance of denial of coverage.
@mariamariamaria: There are some DX codes that can be related to domestic violence in the V61 series. They are related to family disruption. Also some counseling V-codes can indicate domestic violence in the medical record.
@remedios: I was just coming here to say the same thing. I would really like to see some statistics, or else this would be more like the 'well they didn't say there weren't going to be death panels' argument that conservatives like to drag out. That being said, as Lymed and DutchessofDork have pointed out it has happened and that is disgusting, but I don't think a handful of claims are going to sway any conservatives on how wonderful insurance companies are.
@Alys Brangwin can't stop the beat: True, but would the insurance company have access to it? They may once have, but since the implementation of HIPAA I would think that the insurance company couldn't access that kind of info. Not that I don't think insurance companies are shitty toward private policy owners, but breaking HIPAA laws is no joke.
@mariamariamaria: Most likely they get caught in the umbrella of "pre-existing condition" during post-claim underwriting. There is so much information in the list of diagnoses and procedures. Most people would be shocked at how much of their dirty laundry can be encapsulated in an ICD-9 code.
@mariamariamaria: Even if there's not a diagnostic code, can the insurance company access your doctor's chart notes? Every time I've been to an ER or Urgency Care I've been asked whether I feel safe at home, which a nurse had to explain to me was a question about whether I was suffering abuse at home, because I was quite puzzled and thought she was maybe asking about whether I feared a home invasion because of the neighborhood I live in. All of which is to say, if I'd said "No, I don't feel safe at home," I think that would've gone into my chart notes.
Consistent with what Lymed as well, some insurance companies were doing this in the 90s, but after legislation in many states, there hasn't been indication that they're currently doing it. But also, it's hard to get the reporting that would indicate this. I'm no HIPAA expert, but it seems that insurance companies should be required to report aggregate data. Are they prohibited by HIPAA from doing this? Still, it appears they stopped precisely because of state legislation. Perhaps the real evil are the state legislatures that haven't adopted similar laws.
@mariamariamaria: HIPAA allows you to give people and institutions the right to see personal health information. You give the insurance company the right to access that information when you apply or enroll.
@Penny_Esq: This would have triggered the provider to provide or offer counseling which would have one of those telling V-codes in your chart. The same thing happens when they ask you if you smoke. They usually offer smoking cessation counseling which adds one of the counseling V-codes and then they add "tobacco use disorder" to the list of your diagnoses.
@Lymed: True, however isn't the access limited to "need to know" information, i.e. private health information that is required to process the claim (doc's information, diagnosis codes, etc), but would that include a police report? I was wondering specifically about police reports that are tied to incidents that require medical attention. The report wouldn't be included in the medical record would it? And even if it was, is that info required to pay the claim? I suppose there must be diagnosis codes that must trigger further digging... sigh.
@mariamariamaria: Two things. When looking to get coverage, you may have to give your insurance company access to all past medical records or they may just guess and deny coverage because they believe you failed to disclose something. Individual insurance is very onerous compared to employer based.
The police report is not covered by HIPAA. I am guessing they don't find a police report, but somehow it comes up - whether it is suggested from past medical records or comes up in a conversation with the insurance company.
The great thing about this being a pre-existing condition is that abused women are already pre-conditioned not to push issues too far, so they'll probably just all accept it and we can increase shareholder value!
10/05/09
10/05/09
honestly i'd love if everybody in the u.s. just cancelled their insurance policies on the same day. now let's negotiate.
10/05/09
The really screwed up part is that if I hadn't sought treatment, I would be insured...but I would probably be almost dead.
10/05/09
I'd contact your state or county and see if there are any local programs for people with pre-existing conditions. Some states have insurance pools for people with pre-ex conditions but they are often very expensive.
10/05/09
As a paramedic and RN, I was required to ask patients, especially female, specific questions about domestic violence when I was doing direct patient care. Now, I see I probably just fucked up their insurance coverage forever. Nice.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Now, they'll start classifying weird injuries/ailments inside of categories in this "map."
"I have a migraine headache... can you honestly call that paranoid schizophrenia? I'm not the victim of domestic violence!!!"
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Just...
No.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Consistent with what Lymed as well, some insurance companies were doing this in the 90s, but after legislation in many states, there hasn't been indication that they're currently doing it. But also, it's hard to get the reporting that would indicate this. I'm no HIPAA expert, but it seems that insurance companies should be required to report aggregate data. Are they prohibited by HIPAA from doing this? Still, it appears they stopped precisely because of state legislation. Perhaps the real evil are the state legislatures that haven't adopted similar laws.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
The police report is not covered by HIPAA. I am guessing they don't find a police report, but somehow it comes up - whether it is suggested from past medical records or comes up in a conversation with the insurance company.
10/05/09
10/05/09
I felt dirty typing that.