<![CDATA[Jezebel: infidelity]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: infidelity]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/infidelity http://jezebel.com/tag/infidelity <![CDATA[ "Chronic Male Horniness" Is Not An Excuse For, Well, Anything ]]> cherico5808.jpgJournalist Susannah Breslin keeps a website that we've mentioned here before, called 'Letters From Johns', on which she posts letters from dudes who frequent prostitutes. The most recent entry starts this way: "I've often heard women wonder why men with sexy wives or girlfriends would solicit prostitutes. The answer really is simple: Even Marilyn Monroe could get a little boring after a few years, and having sex with other women is fun. Just like skiing is fun, or eating chocolate cake, or playing a slot machine, or riding a roller coaster." It reminded me of an article I read on GQ's website yesterday, called Divorce: The Ultimate Aphrodisiac, where the author, Adam Sachs, is describing the demise of his marriage. His wife cheated on him, which came as a shock, because Sachs always figured, "I always thought I'd be the one who'd fuck it up."

And why did he think he'd be the one to ruin the marriage? "As a travel writer, I live an easy, pampered life. And like many without real cares, I am not unfamiliar with the urge to drive the happy bus off the side of the mountain just to see what happens," Sachs writes. "Complicating this is that disease of the brain called chronic male horniness. I used to tell people that the world will never seem more teeming with beautiful, fascinating, fuckable people than on the sunny afternoon when you walk to the post office carrying a box full of your wedding invitations."

My problem with that statement is not that he thought about fucking other people — everyone with a pulse, regardless of how much in love they are, thinks about fucking other people — it's that he attributes it to chronic male horniness, as if women couldn't possibly understand what it's like to lust after strangers. The John's reasoning is identical to Sachs's. Even fucking Marilyn Monroe gets boring, he exclaims. Well you know what, Adam, getting boned by George Clooney probably loses its luster after a couple of years, too! The fact that I even need to point out that all humans, regardless of gender, have biological urges is completely ridiculous, but I guess I'm going to have to keep doing it until men take intellectual responsibility for their wandering Johnsons.

Divorce: The Ultimate Aphrodisiac [Men.Style.Com]
I've Seen Every Kind Of Hooker Going [Letters From Johns]

]]>
Thu, 08 May 2008 13:00:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388536&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Eliot Spitzer's Indiscretions Made His Wife Age Before Our Eyes ]]> SildaLead031308.jpgWomen of a certain age have it hard. They get pushed out of the workforce for younger, "better models." Sometimes their husbands of many decades cheat on them with prostitutes! Which brings us to Silda Wall Spitzer. As the week has worn, the chatter about Eliot Spitzer's accomplished, philanthropic, whip-smart wife — and what she must be feeling, thinking, and planning — has exploded, including commentary by bloggers, internet commenters and Ed Koch (the former mayor of New York), on how the 50-year-old mother of three seemingly aged several years overnight. Curious, we took a look at recent photographs of of the Harvard Law grad and found a marked difference in her face, which can only be described as exhausted and devastated, yet strong*. But that's just us. What do you think? After the jump, a chronological photo gallery of Ms. Spitzer's public appearances through the years.


*(This is not a criticism, people.)

SildaSpizterGallery1.jpgLeft: October 5, 2006. Right: November 7, 2006.


SildaSpitzerGalleryB.jpgLeft: November 17, 2006. Right, April 24, 2007.


SildaSpitzerGalleryC.jpgLeft: September 9, 2007. Right, December 1, 2007.


SildaSpitzerGalleryD.jpgLeft: December 4, 2007. Right: February 25, 2007.


SildaSpitzerGalleryE.jpgLeft: March 11, 2008. Right: March 12, 2008.

(Images via Getty)

Earlier: Women On Silda Wall: "I'd Have Paraded In Front Of A Microphone With A Knife"

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:00:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367235&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Did Eliot Spitzer Risk Everything To Pay For Sex? ]]> spitzer31308.jpgYesterday we looked at the Spitzer scandal from the prostitutes' point of view, and now we ask the question: why did Eliot risk everything to bone a hooker in the first place? One possibility, according to the Times of London, is that he's addicted to sex. An anonymous columnist writes in today's paper, "My desire for sex was so overwhelming that I had difficulty breathing." This "John X" says that he was a sex addict because "I wanted to feel nothing; oblivion feels good when you've had a bad day at work, or are hung-over." (It all stemmed from a basic inability to communicate with the opposite sex.) "It's a mistake to associate paid sex with feelings. Better to associate it with a lack of feelings, a big frightening void, an inability to communicate sexually and emotionally with a partner."

But by all accounts, Silda and Eliot had a decent marriage before the deluge. Newsweek offers some alternative theories. Susannah Breslin, a writer who is soliciting "Letters from Johns" on an eponymous website writes about some of the letters she received, and most of the prostitute-frequenting married men she's talked to went to hookers because their wives no longer had sex with them or because they got their rocks off on the taboo of it all. "For some men, especially those who are seen as particularly moral or righteous in their public lives (think of all those fallen preachers)," Breslin notes, "Part of the appeal is the fact that it is illegal and a moral transgression in their eyes."

It could be an honest-to-goodness kink, or maybe it's Spitzer's biology! According to Newsweek, men who cheat are "sensation seekers" who have "lower levels of monoamine oxidase A," the chemical that regulates dopamine, the "pleasure" neurotransmitter. Also, the kind of person who is a politician is often incredibly egocentric. Says University of Washington political scientist John Gastil: "For high-profile offices... you have to have a kind of personality where you are very interested in yourself and your personal needs, as well as the needs of others... When the gratification of your desire for social change becomes the justification for so much of what you do in your career, it's not a leap to then say, 'Well, my other desires and needs are equally justified.' You come up with elaborate justifications. 'Hey, 23 hours day I'm working hard for the people of New York. Time for a little me time!'"

And Spitzer will have a ton of "me" time now that he's resigned. The oft-heard moral of this story — to me, at least — is be wary of anyone who goes around crowing about how moral and ethical they are. If Spitzer hadn't claimed to be such a paragon of virtue, the people of New York would probably be more forgiving. Look at former Providence mayor Buddy Cianci or former D.C. mayor Marion Barry. Both left office "disgraced" but returned after a couple years. People forgave them because they never expected them to be particularly moral in the first place. If Spitzer had been honest with himself about his true moral fiber, maybe we wouldn't have seen poor Silda's destroyed visage on our television screens yesterday. She — and we — would have known better.

Dear John [Newsweek]
His Cheating Brain [Newsweek]

Earlier: Enough About Eliot. What About The Hookers?

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:30:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367368&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Women On Silda Wall: "I'd Have Paraded In Front Of A Microphone With A Knife" ]]> sildatoday031208.jpgAfter two days of relentless focus and attention on the now-resigned New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, the news agencies have set their sights on the problem of prostitution, and, of course, on his now-suffering wife, Silda. Her "charmed life slips away," reads an AP headline. "Brainy, beautiful, betrayed," reports CBS News. "Many wonder, 'why does she stay with him?'" writes a reporter for the L.A. Times. (The NY Post's Cindy Adams is all "so what?"). By all accounts, Silda Wall Spitzer was one of those smart, over-achieving women who awe and inspire. She had a strong maternal figure (her mom insisted she list her profession as "home administrator" rather than "housewife", on her college applications), a successful and lucrative law career (she out-earned her husband as a mergers and acquisitions specialist at a top New York firm) and, in addition to raising three daughters, she founded a philanthropic community service organization. And then the news broke about her husband.

Standing by her husband's side during his press conference was her decision to make, and probably a tough one. But was it the right one? How would you deal with a life-shattering betrayal — when everyone is watching?

Silda (named after a Teutonic goddess) grew up in Concord, NC, attended Meredith, women's college in Raleigh, and went from there to Harvard Law. She met — and married — a fellow Harvard student named Peter Stamos; the marriage lasted 29 days. Later she joined prestigious NYC law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, billing 3,300 hours a year — more than nine hours a day, including weekends. She married Spitzer in 1987 and put her career on hold in 1994. They had two children by then (they currently have three daughters, 17, 15 and 13), which impacted her decision: "I felt very conflicted and emotional about leaving my job," she told Vogue last year. "It was not something I wanted to do, but I have never once doubted that it was the right decision for us. You don't want to give up your dreams, but you also have to confront the reality of your life. Ultimately, it was more important for me to have my family work."

Somewhere along the way, her focus shifted from career achievement to domestic accomplishment. Add that to standing next to her husband as he admits a breach of trust and you've got a recipe that leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many women. Writers from the L.A. Times interviewed females from different cities, and of different ages and walks of life. The reaction is the same: Women are ashamed of Silda. "I find it nauseating . . . phony and awful," Leah Schanzer, 38, tells the paper. Her friend Leslie Heller, 47, agrees. "It makes it seem like she's Susie Homemaker. She shouldn't be standing there, next to him." Says Linda Walters, 61: "She should've said, 'This is your fight. This is your battle. You stand there and get yourself out of it.'" "I'd have paraded in front of the microphone with a knife," says Cassandra Horton, 43.

Should a woman who has given up her career for her family stand by that family — including her husband — no matter what? It might make Silda look bad to face the press while holding her husband's hand, but would it look worse if she didn't? Is there bravery in standing by your man, as it were? Or, should Silda, as Dina Matos McGreevy — whose husband announced he was a "Gay American" — writes in today's New York Times, have made the decision to stand by herself and let the man in question face the cameras on his own?

NY First Lady's Charmed Life Slips Away [Breitbart]
Silda Spitzer, The Wife Who Gave Up Career To Back Politics And Ambition [Times]
Stand By Yourself [New York Times]
Gov.'s Wife: Brainy, Beautiful, Betrayed [CBS News]
Wife Puts Troubling Face On The Spitzer Scandal [L.A. Times]
Stay With Shpritzer, Smart Lady [NY Post]

Related: Poll: Would You Have Approved If Silda Spitzer Had Punched Eliot When They Were On That Stage? [Say Anything]

]]>
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366828&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lauer On Spitzer: Some Political Wives "Become Almost An Appendage Of Their Spouse" ]]> Okay kids, we've got another clip from the Today Show featuring more critique of New York governor Eliot Spitzer's indiscretions. This one features Dina Matos, the aggrieved former first lady from New Jersey whose onetime hubby famously cheated on her with another man. Ms. Matos was thoughtful and sensitive during her interview with Today's Matt Lauer, but we can't say the same for the show itself. First off: What was up with the show's split-screen of footage of Ms. Matos and her ex-husband during his public declaration of infidelity, and that of Governor Spitzer and his wife Silda? (Tasteful blue suits on the women! Red striped ties on the men!) It was creepy and unnecessary. Secondly: What the fuck is Matt Lauer talking about? As explanation as to why Silda Wall Spitzer stood by her man, he said, "Some of these political spouses create their own identity based on their spouse's identity...and perhaps they're worried that if they don't stand by that person at that time they somehow lose their own identity." You sort it out. Clip above.


Why Wives Stand By Scandal-Stained Husbands [MSNBC]

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:30:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366289&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yeah, We Know: Dr. Laura Schlessinger Is Full Of Shit ]]> Today Show producers must have been in overdrive yesterday afternoon: The talk/news program was pretty much all Eliot Spitzer this morning, featuring an interview with former New Jersey first lady Dina Matos McGreevey (more on her later) and Dr. Laura Schlessinger, who sent Today Show viewers into fits of fury after she suggested that Eliot Spitzer's wife Silda — and other cheated-on ladies — was somehow responsible for her husband's transgressions. (Choice quote: "These days, women don't spend a lot of time thinking how they can give their men what they need."). Sure, it would be easy to rip Schlessinger a new one but honestly, does anyone really take this woman seriously? She's basically a humorless, post-menopausal Ann Coulter with a physiology degree. And she's been saying this sort of shit about women for a while now. Clip above.


Earlier: Dr. Laura Blames Whiny Women, "Defends" Her Soldier Son

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:00:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366283&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Not To Settle, Brought To You By <i>Moment Of Truth</i> ]]> This Playmate-y chick is by far the most tragic contestant yet to appear on Fox's Moment of Truth, wherein contestants willingly attach themselves to polygraphs, submit themselves to the probing questions of loved ones and reveal dark, uncomfortable truths. Trapped in a Love Triangle with two nerdy IT guy types, perhaps she thought coming clean to her husband about her unresolved feelings for her ex would be easier if won a hundred grand or so to split with him. Perhaps she thought she was doing the right thing. But O! The irony. Perhaps she had not prepared for the question that knocked her out of the running.

]]>
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:13:57 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360682&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Excuses, Excuses ]]> overbrownbabies011508.jpgHusband left you for a newer model? Turns out you were right: He is a narcissistic jerk! Dr. Richard A. Friedman, a professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College, is sounding off on midlife crises among men, calling them "socially acceptable shorthand for what you do when you suddenly wake up and discover that you're not 20 anymore." Says Friedman: "Why do we have to label a common reaction of the male species to one of life's challenges — the boredom of the routine — as a crisis? True, men are generally more novelty-seeking than women, but they can certainly decide what they do with their impulses." [NY Times]

]]>
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:45:00 EST Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=344844&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Just Got Dumped? Maybe It's Time To Scream, Stalk, And Embrace Your Inner Stacy ]]> waynesworld102507.jpgAfter hearing about the Herpes Avenger, the Brooklyn woman who plastered the face of an STD-carrying former lover all over her neighborhood and the internets, my first thought was Jesus, what a psycho. But then I read what Moe wrote about her boyfriend and "acting like a typically-female species of psychopath" after a breakup and I thought, huh, maybe the behavior of the herpes harlot is actually semi-justifiable! Because let's be honest. We've all been that girl before. At least I have. I freely admit that I peed on my freshman year boyfriend's porch after he dumped me, and I also might have fucked someone's best friend after he refused to break up with me in person. I polled the other Jezebels, and apparently each one of us has been known to pay a visit psychotown on occasion.

Beyond the run-of-the-mill cyberstalking, drunk dialing, and boning of the ex-bf's friends (a particular fave 'round these parts), one Jezebel "briefly had a blog on which I would take note of changes in his MySpace profile and speculate as to which of his newly-added female friends he was doing. Also I would send him text messages along the lines of 'I want to shit in your eye.'" Oooh, clever, and cached for eternity!

Anna asks, "Does publishing an entire book on breakups count as psycho? I. WAS. PISSED." Not psycho! I've found that writing about break-ups is the best revenge!

Another Gawker media blogger says, "I spray-painted SLUT on a dude's dorm room door once after I found out he was hooking up with both me and this girl in my creative class who I hated." Oooh, effective and hard to get rid of!

In fact, even being called psycho (or "crazy" or "dramatic") in the first place is often just a way for guys to marginalize what they perceive as messy female emotions. Yale social psychologist Victoria Brescoll, in an article about male vs. female tears, puts it this way: "When men express anger they gain status, but when women express anger they lose status." So the next time you're disrespected, don't be afraid to fight unfair notions of lady hysteria and unleash the beast.

Related: Herpes Avenger Is Fighting STDs With Fliers [Gawker]
Dating Diaries: Becoming That Girl [Marie Claire]
Hell Hath No Fury: Women's Letters From The End Of The Affair [Amazon]
Modern Love: Me? I'm Just Fine (Whimper). Really (Sob). [NY Times]

Earlier: Boys Who Use The Word Drama: An Investigation

]]>
Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:00:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=314508&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Woman Who Dates Married Men Makes No Apologies But Plenty Of Excuses ]]> husbandsnatcher102307.jpgDulcie Pearce of UK tabloid The Sun spoke to a self-confessed "husband snatcher" named Alliyah Johnson about why she pursues men who have wives. Alliyah, a 23-year-old "model" says she was once in a relationship with Steve, a guy her own age who constantly told her he was in love with her, which was "a real turn-off." Even worse, when Steve took Alliyah out for her birthday, he took her to "a dirty kebab shop" with plastic chairs and gave her a secondhand PlayStation game, with the label still on it. "I was mortified," Alliyah explains. So Alliyah did what any other disillusioned young woman would do: She ditched Steve and headed to a swanky bar, where she met 45-year-old man named Tom, who bought her champagne, asked for her number and, a few days later, took her out for dinner at a really "posh" restaurant, where he confessed he was married with two kids.

It was strange, but for some reason I felt quite relieved by this news. It meant that he wouldn't ever be telling me he loved me. Instead, we could just have some fun with no strings attached. [Also], I didn't feel guilty about the fact he had kids because I didn't know them. They were his, not mine, so I didn't feel like I was doing anything wrong.
And so began Alliyah's career as the other woman. Alliyah is currently dating two businessmen at the same time, but doesn't tell either guy about the other, because it makes each "feel special" to think he's the only one. Alliyah swears she's not a homewrecker: "The men are the ones in a committed relationship who chose to cheat on their wives and family. I am free and single, and in no way looking to destroy anyone's marriage." (She claims if these men weren't seeing her, they'd just be seeing someone else.) And you know what? When you look at it, it kinda makes sense: Here, you have a woman who is happy, getting laid and being showered with gifts. And then we remember: She's fucking someone's husband.

The Husband Snatchers [The Sun]

]]>
Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313988&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ If You Cheat, And Don't Feel Bad About It, Are You A Sociopath? ]]> scarletletter.jpgCheating on a husband or boyfriend may not exactly be exemplary conduct, but there are certainly worse things one can do, morally speaking. And while we're speaking of morals, what if you don't really have them? Or at least don't apply them to situations like these? Morality is subjective after all. There's an interesting question on the matter in Salon's advice column today. A married woman and a serial cheater writes in that not only does her husband not know about her infidelities, she has absolutely no guilt about it. This led advice columnist Cary Tennis to wonder whether she was a sociopath. (He eventually decided that she probably isn't.) According to a piece on Nerve today comparing how differently Americans and the French view infidelity, it makes sense that an American would think that there might be something fucked up with a person who could cheat and not feel bad about it. But apparently things are different in France:
People still wonder why Monica Lewinsky was a big deal — after all, the current president's wife, whom he met when he officiated at her first wedding, spent most of 2005 living in New York with her lover.

It sort of reminds us of a quote from our favorite cougar, Maude from Harold and Maude:

Vice, Virtue. It's best not to be too moral. You cheat yourself out of too much life. Aim above morality. If you apply that to life, then you're bound to live life fully.
Since no one truly knows what goes on in a relationship besides the two people in it, is it for anyone else to say whether the cheater is a horrible person?

I'm Cheating On My Husband And Loving It. Is That A Problem? [Salon]
History of Single Life: Infidelity [Nerve]

]]>
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:00:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308935&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Do Wives Blame The "Other Woman" For Their Husbands' Wandering Weiners? ]]> xsr20310180009.widec.jpgToday the esteemed British newspaper The Daily Mail ponders that age-old question: When men cheat, why do their wives blame the other woman? I've thought about this a lot, because I've been the "other woman," a fact that brought me a huge amount of soul-wrenching grief for a brief period about four years back that I'd almost completely repressed until she called me up a month ago and reminded me she was still recovering from the aftershocks of my shitty 25-year-old judgment. (Moral: Just say no, repeat as necessary, etc.) I was surprised, however, that she had directed so much anger at me for what was clearly HIS BAD. We were all lapsed Catholics: "adultery" is the mortal sin; "coveting they neighbor's midlife-deranged husband" is merely venal. But I gleaned some insight into the situation when I read a sickening column in last month's Arena by a guy who had never gotten so much O.P. pussy since he tied the knot. The crux of the story was something like, "Women are vile creatures who will do anything to prove to themselves that they are better than other women and what better way to prove that than tantalize a man sufficiently to seduce him into a potentially life-destroying dalliance?"

Um, EARTH TO HUMANS: the people who write scripts in which women act that way are generally MEN. Specifically, men trying to justify to themselves cheating on their wives by saying "women are as bad as men" but newsflash guys we're not. Most women who get involved with married men have kind of the opposite problem. Me, I'd just been fired from a job and hadn't had a boyfriend in approximately three decades and so it was part of a "my life is destined to suck" phase I was going through. And although I was grateful for his friendship, I realized when I found a single boyfriend that I had actually fooled myself into thinking no one would ever want me as primary care provider. No seriously, that's how women can be stupid. Anyway, so we're all equally stupid, which is why I need to remind you now: don't fuck around with someone who is married and married people, seriously, hello, maybe try therapy first.

And finally, if you're reading, I am truly, really, genuinely sorry.

Why Do We Always Blame The Other Woman When Men Have The Affair? [Daily Mail]

]]>
Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:00:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307578&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Are We Cheating Whores Or Just Friendly And Popular? ]]> scarletletter.jpgThere's a quiz regarding relationships and fidelity in the UK paper The Mirror today that's sorta retarded. The eight-question, multiple-choice quiz is supposed to help readers determine the likelihood of whether or not they will be unfaithful to their significant others. Three problems: If you don't have a boyfriend, you have to pretend that you do when answering the questions if you want "accurate" results. Secondly, the questions seems to be based on a core belief that people cheat and/or flirt solely because of self-esteem issues. Third, the quiz assumes that a range of behavior counts as cheating — other than sexual contact — like flirting with an old guy just for fun, or going for drinks with your co-worker, or taking a guy's number in a bar. Most women do those things all the time in varying degrees. Does that mean we're big cheaters, or simply personable and normal? We took the test ourselves:

The results are broken down into four groups. Here's how the Mirror lists them:

CHEAT IN WAITING
You may think it's all just harmless flirting but because you rely on sexual attention to feel good it only takes a rough patch to send you into the arms of another. Wake up to your cheating potential now, and accept that true self-esteem always comes from within.

DITHERER
You grew up desperate for security, so you won't risk losing your relationship. But you wonder if you should have someone else waiting in the wings. When men pay you attention, you're scared of rejecting them so you're liable to give out mixed sexual signals, then panic when they expect more from you. Face up to the games you're playing - and put your trust back into your real relationship.

QUEEN OF DENIAL
You're unhappy in your relationship yet you won't even look at another man in case you're tempted to stray. Being this closed down suggests that your self-confidence has taken a real battering and you're prepared to put up and shut up rather than leave. And if that sounds way too risky consider pursuing a friendship with the other man - that alone may show you that there's an alternative out there.

FAITHFUL.. NEARLY
Everyone has the potential to start an affair, but you're nowhere near it at the moment. You're happy in your relationship and sexually confident enough to enjoy a harmless spot of flirtation with other men occasionally. When problems do arise you talk about them, and you would never expect a man to be the answer to everything.

Our results:
Anna : Faithful...Nearly
Dodai: The Ditherer
Moe: Faithful...Nearly (For the most part. She admits to being all over the map.)
Tracie: 50/50 split between Faithful...Nearly and Cheat in Waiting
Jennifer: Faithful...Nearly

Obviously, such a quiz shouldn't be taken to heart, since answering eight questions about yourself with answers that don't even necessarily reflect how you feel could never truly be that enlightening. But you know, we never met a silly British quiz we didn't take.

How Likely Are You To Cheat? [Mirror]

]]>
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:30:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305797&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Scary Form of Crotch Rot Makes a Comeback ]]> zach_braff8-13-07.jpg
  • The STD of yore, syphilis, is back, baby, and on the rise in New York City! This obviously has nothing to do with Zach Braff being in town all summer. [NY Times]
  • Kate Hudson may think that men are whores by nature (and that it's okay!), but nerds beg to differ. UC Berkeley math professor Dr. David Gale says it's mathematically impossible for men to have more sexual partners than women — we would tell you more about the handy-dandy equation he uses to back up this claim, but we didn't quite get it. [NY Times]
  • An alarming percentage of women are unaware that HPV can cause cervical cancer and even fewer know that there is a vaccine available. Now you know ladies, so get thee to Dr. Pap Smear and thank us later. [BBC News]
  • A 13-year old Egyptian girl died during a circumcision procedure, only a few weeks after a similar death prompted health officials in the country to ban the heinous practice. [Fox News]

  • Maryland police accidentally let a sexual assault suspect go after they arrested him for molesting a 9-year old girl. The perv is still on the loose. Way to fucking go, Maryland PD. [Fox News]
  • Yay, Ohio! The state's Civil Rights Commission is pushing for companies with four or more employees to grant their workers 12 weeks of unpaid maternity leave, regardless of how long they've worked for the company. Wait, unpaid? That sorta sucks, actually. [NY Times]
  • Irene Morgan Kirkaldy, a Civil Rights pioneer whose refusal to make room for a white bus passenger preceded Rosa Parks by a decade, has died at the age of 90. [NY Times]
  • Dr. Howard Judd, whose expertise in menopause led to significant advances in estrogen and hormone treatments, died at the age of 71. How he knew so much about hot flashes, we'll never know. [NY Times]
  • A new study shows that taking a birth control pill for an extended period of time can affect fertility down the road. [Telegraph]
  • The latest trend in bodice rippers comes out of Australia, as romance writers are penning hunky heroes that are more like your average Joe. Eh, we prefer the perviness of VC Andrews incest-laden paperbacks anyday. [Reuters]
  • In the stupid legal battles department, some schmo is suing 1-800-Flowers for $1 million for revealing his affair to his wife. Something tells us he's going to have a hard time getting a date after this. [ABC News]
  • We're not sure where we stand on the Mexico City street vendor debate — aside from the fact that we think the tacos are super tasty — but we do think the woman fighting the Mayor's plans to clean up the city is one bad-ass great grandma. [LA Times]
]]>
Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:40:00 EDT amparry http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288840&view=rss&microfeed=true