Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #hotchickswithdouchebags more →
Hot Chicks With Dorffbags
Litigious Chicks With Douchebags
Diet Packs Will Make You Eat More • Female Shoppers Love Food Courts


08/04/09
Here we are, one big happy fucking family!
08/04/09
08/04/09
08/04/09
11/18/08
11/18/08
Here are some highlights:
13. According to the Book, a Douchebag is, inter alia, "a feminine hygiene device used for cleansing."
18. The Publication refers to the Plaintiff as a Douchebag.
22. The Publication is false as it pertain [sic] to the Plaintiff.
25. Plaintiff has been, and continues to be the subject of ridicule in that he has been, is now, and continues to be called a Douchebag by friends, acquaintances, coworkers, employers, and strangers alike.
30. The Publication depicts Plaintiff has [sic] a "Douchebag" and a dubious man.
11/18/08
11/18/08
I think an actual douchebag should sue them for alleging that a feminine hygiene device used for cleansing is considered derogatory, offensive, and dubious.
11/18/08
That would be amazing.
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
If you're gonna make a book calling people douchebags, expect lawsuits.
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
And, yes, there is a very big difference. This a book making fun of some dudes. GGW videotapes intoxicated girls (some underage) taking off their clothes in the shower. VERY big difference.
11/18/08
11/18/08
Would this book be sort of the same thing. If someone is out in public they are fair game. I could put a picture of them online and make fun of it.
I know that DB1 is profiting from this book,but don't tabloids profit from what they print? Doesn't this very website post pictures of people that we then make fun of? And doesn't this website profit from such photos?
11/18/08
My super smart law school friend explained it to me once; someone had written a pretty mean opinion article about him in our school's newspaper and apparently he was fair game because he was the Student Trustee and therefore an elected official. But if he had been one of us "common folk" I think he could've sued.
11/18/08
I'm not sure how this applies to pictures taken in public places of people who are not "in the public eye." I believe it depends mostly on state law.
Either way, if I'm on the jury in this defamation suit, I'm leaning towards this dude being a flaming douche bag, because friends and co-workers are only going to take teasing so far. They will eventually say, "Dude, I AM KIDDING" and then whisper "douche bag" and laugh. Whatever. He either can't take a joke, or those who know him best aren't joking.
11/19/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
NSFW because of language and HILARITY. Note: I am currently drinking Heineken.
11/18/08
Popped collars make me blind with rage, BTW.
11/18/08