Jezebel 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 11:35 AM
Sat Nov 28
29 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
tips@jezebel.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
Email | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
Email | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
Email | Twitter
Sadie Stein
Email | Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
Email | Twitter
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
Email | Twitter
Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers
Email
Lizzie Skurnick
Email
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
If a small designer finds themselves on the other side of the coin, and looking to sue a large corporation, again, who stands a better chance with the outcome, those with a team of copyright attorneys or the indie label?
I think some protective regulation is necessary to protect smaller designers- but it needs to be much more defined than this act, and not some "database" that each designer must exhaustively clear before producing a piece of clothing. Perhaps it's best to start it out regulating the designs of the most pirated items- handbags- and see where it goes from there.
06/18/09
The problem of access to justice occurs all across the legal spectrum. Whenever there's a little guy and a big guy, the little guy is going to be prevented from suing just out of convenience. Here at least they have a cause of action and can settle, as opposed to having no recourse at all.
06/18/09
Basically, these designers are not standing at their forms with a photo of something they plan on copying. Unless they are, in fact, copying it.
06/18/09
You're right, there is definitely inspiration in design. Designers can be inspired by each other or by places, art, etc. But some of these cases, including the ones Forever 21 keeps getting embroiled in are in fact copying. A designer is trying to shortcut their work and decides to just copy, piece by piece, something they see in a magazine, online, etc.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
Her response? She settled out of court, publicly apologized and removed the offending garment from the collection and from stores (which all leads me to believe someone on her design team was the actual offender).
She was wrong to steal in the first place, but at least she owned up to her own hypocrisy and made amends.
06/18/09
I would put the jacket in the latter category. I would put the "fake" motorcycle bag (which, I....owned) in the former category because it's an exact copy.
From what I have seen of the Forever 21 pieces, some are total knock-offs, but most I am okay with.
Fashion is art, and any artist will be inspired by countless things.
06/18/09
The second one... well that's basically a copy with different colors.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
05/08/09
This exhibit seemed to be so much about showing the history of fashion. What there anything in the exhibit to communicate how each model influenced the artist? Their personalities, likes, dislikes, attitudes or just damn (sound it out) "jua de vie" (cause I can't spell it, let alone even begin to start). HOW did the model muse? They don't just stand there. You CANNOT tell me that Veruschka just Stood there and that photo came out.
Also, that ring belt IS the outfit. Fail. Super Fail.
I'm sorry it sucked. Let's make a better one.
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
P.S. on the blank mannequins. I don't know if they are using them in this show, but the mannequins they use in the main Costume Institute basement galleries are based on Christy Turlington (both facially and in body proportions).
05/08/09
The only exhibits that I saw recently that I loved was the Poiret exhibit and the Nan Kempner exhibit. But it seems like sponsors and donors (like Ms. Wintour) have really gained control of the Institute. The quality of the exhibits has really gone downhill. Poor Harold Koda.
05/08/09
05/08/09