Enter your username and password.
New York, 11:37 PM
Tue Dec 8
67 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
| Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
| Twitter
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter
Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers
Lizzie Skurnick
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I call it "Poodle Perm Dysphoria Syndrome."
12/07/09
Hair - we all lose!
12/07/09
And could we-the-commenters maybe stop bringing up cancer and AIDS every time we read about some more frivolous application of science? It seems to me like all genetic research contributes to the greater body of important scientific knowledge -- and as for partnering with a major cosmetics company, how exactly do people think all this research gets paid for?
What's more, it's absurd to imply that every scientist ought to devote her life to curing deadly diseases. Science has innumerable applications, and it's as ludicrous to hold all scientists responsible for solving the world's ten biggest problems (as determined by who?) as it would be to mandate that I study science instead of English because I'm good at both and science is more important.
Geez.
12/07/09
Says the person whose thesis changed 12 times in the course of 2 years.
12/07/09
12/07/09
But, should I get the urge to have smooth hair for a few days, I turn to my trusty flatiron. It works wonders, even on my corkscrew curls.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I hate curly hair (on me).
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Because it's all for you, of course, and making you you-nique.
12/07/09
Love love love that she rarely straightens her hair if it's not for a role. Power to the Curl (shakes fist)!
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
However, you have written the same exact thing in a number of other threads, and after a while, it becomes tedious. With that said, I am leaving this thread because I post on Jezebel for fun, not to argue with people who decide to pick fights.
12/07/09
Of course it's evident that you were making a joke. What's less clear is the point your joke was trying to make. I'll break it down for you:
1. Level one: semantic content. Since AIDS and cancer have been cured, scientists are now free to work on more frivolous projects.
2. Level two: propositional content. Of course, AIDS and cancer haven't actually been cured; thus your sarcasm indicates irritation with the fact that scientists are spending time on things that you see as obviously less important.
3. Level three: ???
Your response to @inabook and me would seem to indicate that you intended a third level of content to the joke, but what that content might be is unclear (as is obvious from the responses you got, none of which appear to respond to this third level).
It's rather disingenuous of you to respond to the replies you dislike by saying, "I was joking." It's obvious that you were joking. It's much less obvious what you might have been trying to say.
Jezebel is very fun, but it can also be a forum for real discussion. Blowing off a valid line of questioning isn't taking the high road -- it's just taking the easy but somewhat frustrating road.
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/31/09