I plan to get this book. Has anybody heard much about it? Amazon only has one review.
I know that Aristotle was an intelligent fellow.... I guess.... but I'm so glad I learned, before today, that he was a misogynist ass who made a terrible influence on society.
I'm sure there are more things to be said than that on the subject of Aristotle/ misogyny/ patriarchy but all I can say at the moment is "misogynist ass". #themarveloushairygirls
@unmoldednicole: most of ancient greek society was misogynistic. wives and daughters were relegated to the domestic parts of the house and not allowed to enter the parts where the men entertained themselves with philosophical debate and hookers. unless you were a spartan woman, in which case you had more economic and social freedom than the spartan men, but you still couldn't vote on anything. so yeah...the lineage from ancient Greece to modern Ed Hardy D-Bag is quite clear.
@Elmo: Oh my God so do I. Like the writer of the article, I am also a pale skinned dark haired lady and I can't even get into what a pain in the ass it has been. I think, "when will I be able to afford getting the hair on my chin lasered off?" when I would much rather be thinking "when can I afford a trip to Europe?".
None of that even comes close to the reality what these girls faced as they lived during that time, with that condition. I can't wait to read it. #themarveloushairygirls
@unmoldednicole: No no, I'm with you. Year 8 art class, a self-portrait by Frida Kahlo comes up. Class queen shrieks, it looks like you! (and yes, she did use the word "it" to refer to Ms Kahlo). Cue awesome schooling from the teacher, but the mo started getting bleached that night. Whenever I see pictures of Frida I wish I had her guts. No one told her she looked like a dude because of some hair on her top lip. #themarveloushairygirls
@MirabelleIshed: You may want to check with your Maori friends and then ask that question.
On second thought, you may want to do some reading before you even do that.
I am totally encouraging my redheaded girlfriend to make a doc about working in Zimbabwe. She gets her mane touched every day, along with pitying comments and questions about 'what kind of accident she was in' and 'when it will go back to normal.'
Also, at the risk of being flamed, why is that white women need to equate their own hair experience with the black hair experience? And why the need to launch into a black (girl)friend story and round it out with "I so love her hair"?
diclaimer: Not trying to get disemvowled here nor I am trying to knock anyone down. I just feel that these types of statements that are showing up create some disconnet/discord when discussing this so I'd like to get to the root.
@squeakel: I see where your getting and I do the same as well but this is a little different becuase when I bring in my experience it is actually related directly to the issue. White female hair is not in any way related to black female hair experience so bringing it up kind of belittles the WOC and shows a fundamental lack of understanding.
@ZemarSea Urchin: The same way Chris Rock felt the need to equate some of his own hair experiences with those of black women. There is some overlap there (texture, products, racial identity), and there's some overlap between black and white women (expense, time, pain, gender identity).
I do notice that on Jezebel we are kinder to men who come in and sort of apologetically give their two cents about their girlfriend or sister but are quick to pounce on caucasian women for being naive or dismissive (or who we assume is caucasian, since it's not always revealed – which probably says a lot about us, that we assume people are white 'til they state otherwise, just as on other sites posters are assumed male until they state otherwise).
@ZemarSea Urchin: Why do you feel that there has to be such a divide between the two? Do you really think that there are no white women anywhere that understand the "black hair experience"? I spend a ridiculous amount of time every day washing, drying, straightening and styling my hair to make it look "presentable." Every day. I've had perms, chemical straighteners, and dyes put on my hair. I think I understand pretty well what black women put themselves through to achieve "presentable" hair. I'm not saying that it's the exact same, or that I go to the extremes that some women do, but that doesn't mean that I don't understand and empathize with my black friends and their experiences. I think that a huge part of the problem is how we separate ourselves from each other, and assume that no one but those with the same skin color could possibly understand what we're going through. I think that the comments you describe from white women here are attempts to express our support. If you feel like it's belittling to your experience for a white woman (or any other skin color besides black) to express her understanding of your situation, then how can that situation ever change?
@ZemarSea Urchin: A lot of white women are simply unaware of the Things You Cannot Do or Say to black women. And I'm not being patronizing here. I would venture to guess that MOST white women in America don't know that they can't just reach out and touch a black woman's hair. That "reach out and touch" impulse is the same one that pushes us to touch anything else that we think might be soft or interesting, and it often happens before we realize that it's offensive. After all, I know that when I compliment a white friend on her hair, I'll sometimes touch it, since that sort of thing is ingrained in me as a positive (soft, touchable hair, yay). I suppose my point is that someone's not racist just because she's not aware of all of the quirks of black culture. If hair stories from white girls bother you, step up and tell us why. We might have no idea we're doing something that upsets you.
@NowhereGirl: I don't need to drudge up some indirect anectdote to sympathize with women who have made a choice to have an abortion (an extreme example I know but it was the first one I could think of). I ask the woman questions about her experience, about her decision and I withold my personal convicitions and simpl listen and be supportive. I do not say "I lost my baby toe in an accident so totally know how you feel". It would be a odd statement and belittle her experience.
@HeatherNumber1: Also "The same way Chris Rock felt the need to equate some of his own hair experiences with those of black women. There is some overlap there (texture, products, racial identity)". A black man has not the same experience as a white female so a black man commenting is not the same. You even said so. And I am not being snarky though it does read that way.
@NowhereGirl: I'm not saying that it's the exact same
It's not the same AT ALL. They don't relate AT ALL. How many women of color have to say this?
If you feel like it's belittling to your experience for a white woman (or any other skin color besides black) to express her understanding of your situation, then how can that situation ever change?
Constant and stubborn derailing is a pretty mockable offense. White women goes nuts when men do it, then turn right back around and do it to black women. And then you're shocked - SHOCKED! - if we're anything other than warm of heart because you're "trying" to understand. If that's your idea of support, God knows I'd rather have your disdain.
"Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will." Dr. King
@thesciencegirl: I am just trying to assist here as I see many of these commenters ask how they are expected to particpate in the discussion so I'd thought I'd ask what the movitivation of their statements are as a starting point. Does that make sense even?
@ZemarSea Urchin: I think, in some cases, it's misguided empathy. I'm sure there a tons of white women who have a hard time with their hair and feel like, by sharing it, they're "connecting." What many fail to realize is that white hair is not politicized and personalized the way black hair is, if at all. Even if a white woman knows what it's like to have difficult hair, she doesn't know what it's like to have racially-motivated judgments made about her on the basis of her hair. She doesn't know what it's like to walk into any old salon and not know whether there's anyone there who knows how to do black hair. She doesn't know what it's like to walk down the haircare aisle at the store and have only a sliver of the shelf space devoted to products for hair types other than white hair.
I'm a white woman, and I know that I was guilty of this same thought process before I really, really understood that just because my hair is a ungodly mess and takes all kinds of manipulation to get it to do anything at all, does not mean that "I get" what it's like to to be a black woman (or man) with black hair. It came at the same time that I finally "got" what it meant to have white privilege, heterosexual privilege, etc. I'm glad it finally clicked, because it feels more authentic than having these knee-jerk reactions that wound up being really, really ignorant, and left me feeling bad about myself as a participant in the world.
Thinking about my own discovery experience, I also imagine that there is some discomfort about being part of the majority culture and having to admit that you can't imagine, even if you try your hardest, what it would be like to be part of a minority group in America. In some sense, it's much easier to say "Well...my hair's hard to manage too, so we're not that different" than to acknowledge the difference. In the end it winds up being dismissive and insensitive, even if it wasn't intentional. There's strength, growth, and wisdom in acknowledging our differences and actually listening to the stories of those with different experiences, rather than trying to pretend they're not there.
Sorry for the length. Brevity is not my strong suit. In retrospect, I hope you weren't asking a rhetorical question...
@ZemarSea Urchin: but it is our "indirect anecdotes" that give us the insight to be sympathetic to someone else's situation. Without them, we wouldn't know how someone else is feeling. That's practically the definition of empathy. To take someone else's example and relate it to ourselves. There is a common ground between all women of every ethnicity when it comes to the lengths we go to to achieve "beauty." I don't see any reason why we should not meet on that common ground on a site like this.
@ZemarSea Urchin: YES. It makes sense.
People with the power of the majority (I make the distinction so that mixed people can be included in the discussion) can get terribly defensive.
Since I've found the defensiveness to be a remarkably consistent thread, irrespective of whether the actual issue is Black womens' hair, or Patricia Wrede's book, or GatesGate, I usually refer them here
@voteforme: To address your reach out and touch thing may I just say that you are taught as a child to keep your hands to yourself. It is an excellent rule of thumb. Second, your correct no one knows "Things You Cannot Do or Say to black women". And your right it doesn't make you racist but then I wasn't accusing anyone of that sooo...And I am making an attempt as others to tell you why it is not the right method to chose if you want to sympathize. Swapping hair stories is more patronizing than sympathizing frankly. And I do understand the intent is to be kind and understanding and I accept that. Just as the white female should understand my POV and accept that. You see I get it, now I'm trying to help others get it. But they don't get it because they keep justifying instead of simply saying "oh, oops, my bad. How did I go wrong so I will never do it again? I really won't make the same mistake twice." Not "oh I was wrong? But I was just trying to (fill in the blank). How am I supposed to know its wrong? You should just be nicer and point out how I was wrong and tell me how to fix it. Because I don't know any better and I am being nice and understanding your plight. I should get kudos for that not a lecture."
@NowhereGirl: You can be sympathetic about something without making it about your own experience. That's something that commonly gets forgotten, even in a community that purports to be open and supportive.
@NYGal81: I get what you're saying. But just because I use my own life experiences to try to relate to someone else's problems doesn't mean that I am making light of that problem. I do not think that just because I have to get up every day and spend an hour or more doing my hair, that I'm just like black women. I do understand the difference. I think that the problem really boils down to manners. It's not polite in any discussion about anything to turn the conversation back towards yourself. That's just rude.
@NowhereGirl: You're right...it certainly doesn't mean you're willfully being dismissive of someone else's experience. There might be something that happens though, when there's a "me too!" experience across majority/minority lines, that comes across as patronizing, condescending, or disingenuous--even if it's not intended that way.
It's one thing to empathize by saying "Shit...that must be really hard" and saying "Oh I totally know how you feel" (I'm exaggerating the difference and not implying that you do these things--I don't know you at all). I think many people are afraid to acknowledge the discomfort of actually addressing the differences/privilege that come with being in the majority status, so they use "Me too!" as a way to wash away the difference.
@voteforme: Or we could, as white women, educate ourselves and not make it anyone else's responsibility but our own to figure this out.
I'm not sure about this "reach out and touch" thing. So you have this impulse to reach out and touch everything that looks soft and interesting? People's hair isn't like clothing on a rack. Touch away, in the case of the latter. What right do you have to touch another person's hair because you, personally, find it soft and interesting?
@NowhereGirl: "It's not polite in any discussion about anything to turn the conversation back towards yourself. That's just rude."
Then if it's rude by your own admission, why do you keep doing it??
NG: "But... my issues with my hair are what make me able to understand the situation in general."
But everyone here already KNOWS about those issues, because all-white is the majority culture.
What I think people are saying here is that you don't have to GIVE your opinion when other people are trying to offer a different perspective. You can JUST. LISTEN.
NG: "Are you really saying that no one but a black woman can possibly have an opinion about black women's issues?"
No.
But how about if you stop trying to OFFER and INSERT your opinion and JUST. LISTEN.
It never ceases to boggle my mind how majority women can tell men who insist on constantly butting into feminist discussions with their own opinion to JUST LISTEN but *completely fail* to see how that same directive might still apply when other women are talking.
@NYGal81: The length is excused by your reasoned and excellent response. "There's strength, growth, and wisdom in acknowledging our differences and actually listening to the stories of those with different experiences, rather than trying to pretend they're not there." This alone tells me that you have, indeed, learned from your previous mistakes. I might add also that prentending is the first mistake and for some the desire to be included is the other (and equally shameful). Kudos to you.
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: If that is what i've been doing, I apologize. This particular thread started out with someone asking why a white woman might make a certain kind of comment. I would never post an independent comment on this issue saying "these are my issues with MY hair, and this is why it's really all about me me me." I did not realize it was a rhetorical question.
@NowhereGirl: You do not need to relate everything to yourself to understand anothers plight. I could as easily flip this and talk about the shade of my black (which is related to the texture of my hair and makes an great example) skin and the assumptions that are made about me by external persons (even within my own culture). Would you then lament about how pale your skin is and complain that you cannot tan? Do you think that is even relatable? Can you fathom how annoying this can get? Also I read that and my tone sounds super bitchy. And it kind of is but not entirely. Its just that your still beating the same drum, please see NYGal81.
@NYGal81: I think you're right, and I think we complain about it a lot when guys do it ('Oh I get yelled at on the street by women sometimes').
On the other hand, from a purely cosmetic stand point (and I understand that bringing it down to tangible, touchable hair and products is part of the problem), telling, say, a curly-haired Asian woman who spends thousands on straightening or a Jewish woman who relaxes and bleaches her hair that they couldn't possibly understand what it's like for black women who feel the need to conform and therefore can't contribute anything but sympathy is pretty dismissive.
@ZemarSea Urchin: NYGal81 did -- does -- have an excellent response. It's paralleled among in those links, which is the only point I'm trying to make.
No matter what the outer manifestation of the issue -- hair, GatesGate, SciFi, cultural appropriation -- the defensive/denial reponse remains the same.
All I ever request is that people read before opening their mouths, as opposed to just reflexively jumping in and yapping on.
I reiterate, majority women do tend to see it when men do it. They don't see that they themselves are doing it when other women are talking.
IMO, it's a dominant assumption of privileged culture that no matter what the topic at hand, people just HAVE to hear your opinion.
@ZemarSea Urchin: Now you're being a touch defensive and you're shutting down the discussion. You asked a question and you are not liking the answers you're receiving. Touching friends' hair is a pretty widespread thing, and it's not a question of manners or being raised properly. You really can't accuse white people of passing the buck on responsibility because we're turning to you for information. How else are we supposed to learn what's appropriate? I no longer touch my black friends' hair when I think it looks pretty, but my white friends and I do it to each other all the time. It's a white thing, as much as your peeves regarding hair are a black thing.
@NYGal81: Because people do it to me and I don't find it bothersome as long as I know the person and his/her intentions. It's not anyone else's responsibility to lay the information out for us, but it's disingenuous to say that we should educate ourselves and then get pissy when we don't just "get" it. Maybe certain things do need to be spelled out. White people don't magically grow knowledge of minority oppression. It has to be seen and absorbed.
@voteforme: "You really can't accuse white people of passing the buck on responsibility because we're turning to you for information. How else are we supposed to learn what's appropriate?"
EDUCATE YOURSELF. It is not the job of black people to relieve you of your ignorance.
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Wow, I'm sorry, I had no idea I was part of a privileged class or race that was derailing a thread. Maybe it's the white girl in my avatar.
@HeatherNumber1: Okay, um.
First, if you actually read my comment to you, I said none of that.
Way to be defensive, jump to conclusions, and prove the point, though.
(Also, neither of us knows what race -- or mix of races -- the other is, or what privilege the other one might be carrying, do they? A lot of assumptions here?)
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Prove what point? That both you and I have read Derailing for Dummies? That many posters here are arguing from a privileged American perspective?
You told a poster she didn't have to give her (yes, naive) perspective she should just listen. It would be helpful if posters knew, ahead of time, whose opinion was valid in every discussion. So no Jewish women in posts about Jewish women, no lesbians in posts about heterosexuality, and so forth.
Lord knows there's been no problem shutting people down before based on stupid comments or unpopular views, but for the most part they aren't told they shouldn't bother writing in at all. (Disemvowelling is another story.)
@thesciencegirl: As debated on Jezebel, yes. There seems to be a very sweet 'Come on, give the boys a chance!' attitude when it comes to male feminists, which I am not against, and healthy debate when it comes to, for example, men's reactions to abortion (as well as some 'You get no say on the matter so shut it' comments).
For the most part, I have enjoyed the content of this thread and really enjoyed the documentary itself. This specific mixing of threads, of hair touching and people's attempts to educate others without knowing their background, somewhat less.
@HeatherNumber1: Ok, that doesn't really answer my question. Are you drawing a parallel between men in feminism discussions and white women in black hair discussions, or black women in feminism?
@HeatherNumber1: The link you added asks "Can a man be a feminist?" I think a more apt analogy to that would be "Can a white person be an anti-racist?" not "Can a white woman complain about her hair issues in a post on black hair?"
I am very happy that the Chris Rock Docufilm has become so popular and received so much press. Growing up in this kind of culture is an incredible experience with alot of head scratching, laughter, and burning, burning, burning. I have had blow driers, flat irons, hair curlers, S-Curl, Pink Moisturizer, hair fall out, hair texture change, broken mirrors, broken banna clips, broken hair brushes, used a pik, used a comb, curling irons, relaxer cream, hair spray, hair gel, mousse, that green wax shit in a tub, tears, scabs on my scalp and the list is endless. Praise the Lord for my Mama because she could work my hair into anyhting when I was young. And I may not have a weave but there is no way a man is allowed to touch my hair. It takes me over an hour to flat iron and style my hair and I only wash it once a week so I can keep that hair straight and not hit the flat iron again (okay I do touch ups every morning but that is like 1/2 an hour compared to 1.5 hours). And if that m-f'er touches my hair he is going to tangle it up and pull out the waves it took me soooooo long to (perfectly) acheive and then I will have to start all over again. So no touching. Ever! Takes to long for my hair to look this good. And after soooo many relaxers I can't wear my hair natural 'cause the texture is all over the place - straight here, curly there, dead over here. And the amount of product it takes to have "natural" hair? Takes me just as long to wear it natural as it does to wear it straight.
And the amount of product it takes to have "natural" hair? Takes me just as long to wear it natural as it does to wear it straight.
Cosign! If you want to go natural, great. I would suggest the "big chop". But anybody who tries to convince you that it's so easy and more convenient than permed hair is a damn lie. It takes me nearly 90 minutes and THREE big bath towels just to wash and dry my hair.
@Jennifer Daniels: Thank you for your candor. I'm natural, and I'm tired of some of the propaganda that some people are spreading about the ease of caring for naturally kinky hair. People want to create some sort of balance in the universe/compensatory thing where it may not actually exist. A person can end up paying just as much money and/or spending just as much time with natural hair as relaxed hair, minus the social currency of being perceived as "acceptably groomed" or approximating the beauty ideal. Some women go back to straightening because of this. If it's a good choice to make, there's nothing to lose by fully informing parties interested in making the choice -- especially since doing the big chop is a huge step for someone that was raised in a culture where the phrase "bald-headed" in reference to a woman was considered fighting words and a sword of Damocles.*
*In my area of the south, this was the case. By no means am I saying that all black women share my background.
@RosiMac: Why? I don't think she being superior she is being proud of that fact. It is her "natural" hair she can be proud. Do you know that for some black women their hair actually breaks off? Do you know that for some it is difficult to get it to grow past a certain point? I haven't seen the film yet so I don't know if he explores the issues with "natural" hair.
@ZemarSea Urchin: Plus the fact that people are always asking "Is that real? Is that a weave? Are you sure?" to black women with long hair. This happened to my sister just last week; she straightened her naturally curly hair with a flat-iron, making it appear a bit longer than usual, and was interrogated about whether that was REALLY her hair.
I am in love with the afro. I think they are so beautiful. My feelings about it are tied up with some of the happiest, carefree times in my life and with my association with some of the most inspiring, brilliant people I have ever known. You have the right to style your hair in whatever way makes you happiest, but to me, the afro is the ultimate hairstyle - so bold, so gorgeous. None compare.
I have hair that grows kinky and curly and horizontally. Before it hits my shoulders, its wider than them. I feel that as a multi-racial person, I stick out because my hair is too soft to be "black", too kinky to be "white", and too in between to be Native American, and I don't ever feel as though there is a way to wear it that would feel true to my identity other than just wearing it the way it grows--and when I just wash it and let it air dry--that's when I feel the best about it because it is what it is, and I am what I am.
@quinnelizabeth: Miss Jessie's products have your name written all over them. I have crazy mixed-girl hair too and those products have made my mornings a dream.
Tracie is right about Tyra teaching the world about weaves. On tonight's episode of ANTM, I learned that you cannot put your hair into a high ponytail if you have a weave.
Can I also just say that hair is a total grass-is-greener thing? I have the whitest hair ever--it's really like barbie hair (only not plastic), blonde as hell and thick and it was long my whole life. But my whole life I wanted an afro. I love the way afros look. Oprah looked coolest when she was doing, as Chris Rock so depressingly pointed out, the mean news.
I think that my appreciation for afros is wildly affected by the cultural cues that black women's hair--all women's hair, really--signify. I always hated my hair because people thought I was dumb, and silly, and would really really like boys. Indeed, I am smart, mean, and have been called a man hater more times than I can count. Afros do look mean to me--not mean, really, but more like bad-ass. Afros say, "I wear my hair this way and refuse to submit to racist rules about what is appropriate and what isn't." It is not cool for me to ascribe complex attitudes towards society and self to someone because of their fucking hair. It's fucking racist, actually. But as much as I am annoyed and disheartened by my own response, I cannot deny that I have always and will always think that afros look bad ass. I value, highly, the cultural signification afros have, and it's well nigh impossible, at this point, for me to suss out what's attractive to me because of fucked up stereotypes, and what would exist in a world in which our hair did not affect our ability to get hired.
Here's the other thing, though--I totally cut my hair short in order to signify something about myself (ie I'm not barbie). Lots of people are attracted to fashion because it's a way to express one's self, etc. Isn't hair the same way? Can we ever fully divorce a hairstyle from cultural meaning? I am uncomfortable with the implication of associating a certain style (long, short, pink, blue, weave, natural) with personality traits or preferences. But I'm also uncomfortable with the idea that what we wear makes a statement about who we are--so I tend to skip the "fashion" posts on Jezebel.
Obviously, the above paragraph must be tempered by the understanding that problems with black women's hair especially, and other races' women's hair to a lesser but still significant extent, are currently inscribed in racist, sexist, classist ways. So an afro means you're an angry black lady, long blonde hair means you're a dumb barbie doll, red hair means you're a devil child, etc. The big problem with hair and style now is how incredibly biased they are against marginalized groups, and how they perpetuate these bigoted stereotypes, and affect people's ability to get hired. But can we keep the idea of hair "as a statement" without continuing to uphold the fucked uped-ness that comes with the statements hairstyles can make? Or do we need to retire the idea of style and be all Star Trek: TNG until the revolution is done with, then when all the shitty -isms of the world are dead we can get back to inscribing meaning into hairstyles?
@Cimorene: Can I also just say that hair is a total grass-is-greener thing?
You can, but you would be wrong. Unless you LIKE the idea of being seen as dirty, unkempt and threatening just because you wear your hair in its natural state, and you LIKE the idea of being threatened with unemployment because you don't wish to burn or fry your hair straight, or you LIKE names like "African booty scratcher", "Ubangi", and "pickaninny".
Afros say, "I wear my hair this way and refuse to submit to racist rules about what is appropriate and what isn't."
Funny...that's not what my Afro is telling you. Perhaps you should stop taking your cues from Soul Cinema Sundays, jive turkey.
Sophie needs to study...damn promoted this comment
Edited by Jennifer Daniels at 09/30/09 11:32 PM
Jennifer Daniels was starred
Jennifer Daniels was unstarred
@Jennifer Daniels: Oy vey, I just spent a long time crafting a response to this, and then the internet ate it. So I'm gonna try again. Fuck you, internet.
"Funny...that's not what my Afro is telling you. Perhaps you should stop taking your cues from Soul Cinema Sundays, jive turkey."
I'm sorry--this was the point I was attempting to make. That various signifiers have meanings ascribed to them, and then we ascribe those meanings to those things. So an afro "says" something in our culture, just like a miniskirt says something, or glasses say something, or having a dog instead of a cat. They all have these arbitrary meanings, but as a part of the culture, as a person who has been told what the meanings of various things are, I reflexively interpret these things as their meanings, even though that's ridiculous.
And by the grass is greener thing, I meant that by saying that I think [x], in this case afros, is aesthetically pleasing to me, I have put that thing and myself in a fantasy world, in which [x] is nice simply because I think it's nice, and in which [x] has no drawbacks because I don't know about them. A far, far less consequential example is someone who always wanted glasses, but never realized that if you have glasses they'll fog up in the winter in a very annoying way.
So, even though I knew, inasmuch as a white person can know anything about the black experience, that is to say not actually knowing as much as attempting to learn, process, and understand, that there are significant negative consequences of afros, I still thought/think that afros are cool looking. The one black girl in my high school who had an afro had, in my opinion, the best hair in the school. It wasn't until my original comment that I realized that that particular trait of mine was probably, especially because I am white and therefore subject to lots of racism*, white privilege, and unintentional, unrecognized, and internalized racist assumptions of any non-white people, deeply effected by what I saw signified in her hair--what it signified to the dominant culture, of which I have been raised.
So now what?** It's not like recognizing that my aesthetic sensibilities have been affected by--maybe entirely the result of--racist attributions and assumptions, makes me think afros aren't cool. So how do I react to recognizing this particular strain of racism in my self? Even if the result is a relative positive--I think afros are cool-- it's the result of and inevitably perpetuating a racist stereotype of black women and hair, and even if I find that stereotype (or the vague form of it that's subconsciously affecting my tastes) valuable or attractive, it isn't good to be partaking in these cultural codes. If I reflexively and subconsciously associate afros with Angry Black Lady, but then I associate Angry Black Lady with things that are good***, then even if I think both subjects are good, which subverts the dominant code of those two things as bad or whatever, it's still working on the assumption that Angry Black Lady exists outside of the imaginations of angry American right-wing conservative activists. Like, say, in my imagination. Even if I recognize that that is totally fucked up and racist and also really stupid. It's just--I don't think, for me, recognizing that makes it go away from my brain. Just like thinking that my life would be better if I was skinnier doesn't go away from my brain even though I know that's fucked up and incorrect, or catholic morality doesn't go away from my brain just because I've decided that I don't believe in god.
[...and this version is not as good as the first, and is a lot longer. Sorry.]
*not racism like subject to racism against white people, but to being a member of the dominant class, which has not only left me with the white privilege that I have in the world but has constituted me as a white person who has white privilege even if suddenly everybody was blind and we couldn't see race, a privilege which inevitably makes me racist in a thousand thousand ways merely by virtue of being a white person who was taught that she was white.
**Rhetorical questions, though feel free to chime in if you have thoughts. But I recognize that dealing with my racism is my responsibility, and expecting anyone to answer these questions for me is both lazy and privileged.
***I love any angry lady, actually.
@trixiebee67: Indeed, I am trying to. I kind of got halfway through my intended post when I realized something important about my point (ie it was based on unexamined racist assumptions), and then tried to work it out.
@Cimorene: as a part of the culture, as a person who has been told what the meanings of various things are, I reflexively interpret these things as their meanings, even though that's ridiculous.
Then stop, or at least make a conscious effort to. It doesn't get any simpler than that. That soliloquy you just spent all that time writing could've been spent asking yourself why you associate a hairstyle with a very unflattering stereotype. This is a depiction that has long hurt black women - in the media, at work, dating...my God, we're the very reason why the "tone" argument exists. Even worse, you justify your thinking with "well, I think Angry Black Women" are cool, as if anybody should give a shit, let alone the women you're fetishizing.
If I told you that I associate blond hair with dick-sucking white bimbos who have a fetish for big black dicks, wouldn't you tell me to go to hell? If I justified my douchebag theory with "well, that's just what I'm conditioned to think", wouldn't you tell me to pull my head out of my ass? I certainly hope you would.
When I go into work tomorrow, I have to wonder if the new boss I'll be seeing DOES equate my hair with being some kind of jive talking pseudo-revolutionary that secretly hates The Man. I have to worry about whether he'll tell me that my hair is out of dress code - which the powers that be like to do in places where dress codes are common. If I choose to wrap it in a head scarf instead, I get to worry if they'll make me take it off, making some stupid claim about headgear. I get to worry about whether I'll hear things like "chill out, girlfriend!" or "you people are so senstive" or "calm down, Omarosa!" or a long list of shit you couldn't think off if I paid you to try, things that I hear all of the fucking time, things that I either have to swallow to keep the peace or speak out and bring unwanted eyes upon me. Best of all, I get to wonder if I'll be deemed the Angry Black Woman - that character you love so much - because I'm not changing or taking off or ignoring jack shit. Privilege is a wonderful thing. You admit that you've put yourself in a fantasy world. I can't even imagine what that's like if I wanted to. Keep that in mind when you're justifying your way of thinking. And Google the Sapphire stereotype while you're at it and see just how flattering it truly is.
@Jennifer Daniels:
"Then stop, or at least make a conscious effort to. It doesn't get any simpler than that. That soliloquy you just spent all that time writing could've been spent asking yourself why you associate a hairstyle with a very unflattering stereotype."
Uh, clearly that's what she is doing - examining her own head for unthinking racisms and picking them apart. Race is a complicated thing, and she's owning her place of privilege and working out the issues of race that most white people are never obliged to confront. Screaming at her while she's trying to work these things out only encourages her to be silent, to push the difficult problems under again, because it's safer to not think about them and just let them lie unexamined where they continue to do damage.
(said as a biracial girl who looks white so gets the short ends of both fucking sticks when it comes to discussion of race)
@phnuggle: Oh, look. A tone argument. The Angry Black Woman strikes again. "If you don't coddle her and nurse her at your bosom, how will she ever learn?" That's not my problem. I gave Cimorene a starting point, which is something I don't do for hardly ANYBODY. She can take it or leave it. The real question is: does she want knowledge or reassurance? (That's a rhetorical question, BTW.)
@Jennifer Daniels: I mean, there are levels in between attack and coddle. I get where you're coming from, though - big lovefests about how awesome and perfect everyone is doesn't really provide anyone any serious incentive to ask hard questions of themselves. (love the dripping condescension, BTW)
@Jennifer Daniels: Listen, I'm sorry if I offended you, or added to the shit you have to deal with in some way, or anything. I certainly didn't mean to try to justify my feelings about this, or look for reassurance from black people who will tell me my racism is ok with them or something.
It was probably inappropriate to bring this up here, in public and more specifically in this thread, when I should have been dealing with it personally. I genuinely am sorry, both for the fact that I am inadvertently contributing to the shit in the world and for the fact that I dropped it here and offended you. Please accept my apology, if you want to, or not, if you don't want to. And thank you for your help.
@trixiebee67: I'm not sure what you mean by your comment, because it sounds like she is examining her situation. She says "Obviously, the above paragraph must be tempered by the understanding that problems with black women's hair especially...are currently inscribed in racist, sexist, classist ways"
So, can you explain what else she has to do before she is examining her privilege to an acceptable degree?
@Cimorene: Yeah, I have to say, when I read your first sentence, I was like "oh boy, here we go" but then by the end of the post, I could see you pretty much correcting yourself and taking your commentary to a whole new level. I see you trying to put yourself in another's shoes, and I appreciate it.
I would just caution you to remember that even "positive" stereotypes (e.g. "but I LOVE angry black women") are harmful, and can read as really condescending.
Also I love the parallel they drew between long, straight hair being the ideal in the black community and blond hair in the white community. Particularly in the hair saloon bit where the women were trying to recall the age the started dying their hair. The underlying issue was a lot of women aren't walking around in their natural hair state (i.e. texture, color) and spend a lot of time, energy and money trying to upkeep that look.
@Eric Northman is mine: Its trippy when you think about how many women really have no idea what the stuff that comes out of your head naturally looks like, or when you haven't seen it in years.
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/31/09
10/30/09
I know that Aristotle was an intelligent fellow.... I guess.... but I'm so glad I learned, before today, that he was a misogynist ass who made a terrible influence on society.
I'm sure there are more things to be said than that on the subject of Aristotle/ misogyny/ patriarchy but all I can say at the moment is "misogynist ass". #themarveloushairygirls
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
None of that even comes close to the reality what these girls faced as they lived during that time, with that condition. I can't wait to read it. #themarveloushairygirls
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
That was a lot of "uns". I just really love her art. #themarveloushairygirls
10/01/09
10/01/09
Here in Australia, I had no idea of any of the hair stereotypes mentioned about black women's hair. Angry hair, political hair, whatever.
How the hell do you know what someone's hair is saying unless they tell you? I would assume it's just hair. Regardless of their race.
A serious question,is this mostly an american issue?
10/02/09
On second thought, you may want to do some reading before you even do that.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
diclaimer: Not trying to get disemvowled here nor I am trying to knock anyone down. I just feel that these types of statements that are showing up create some disconnet/discord when discussing this so I'd like to get to the root.
10/01/09
People always bring their own experiences to a discussion. This isn't any different.
10/01/09
10/01/09
I do notice that on Jezebel we are kinder to men who come in and sort of apologetically give their two cents about their girlfriend or sister but are quick to pounce on caucasian women for being naive or dismissive (or who we assume is caucasian, since it's not always revealed – which probably says a lot about us, that we assume people are white 'til they state otherwise, just as on other sites posters are assumed male until they state otherwise).
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
It's not the same AT ALL. They don't relate AT ALL. How many women of color have to say this?
If you feel like it's belittling to your experience for a white woman (or any other skin color besides black) to express her understanding of your situation, then how can that situation ever change?
Constant and stubborn derailing is a pretty mockable offense. White women goes nuts when men do it, then turn right back around and do it to black women. And then you're shocked - SHOCKED! - if we're anything other than warm of heart because you're "trying" to understand. If that's your idea of support, God knows I'd rather have your disdain.
"Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will." Dr. King
10/01/09
10/01/09
I'm a white woman, and I know that I was guilty of this same thought process before I really, really understood that just because my hair is a ungodly mess and takes all kinds of manipulation to get it to do anything at all, does not mean that "I get" what it's like to to be a black woman (or man) with black hair. It came at the same time that I finally "got" what it meant to have white privilege, heterosexual privilege, etc. I'm glad it finally clicked, because it feels more authentic than having these knee-jerk reactions that wound up being really, really ignorant, and left me feeling bad about myself as a participant in the world.
Thinking about my own discovery experience, I also imagine that there is some discomfort about being part of the majority culture and having to admit that you can't imagine, even if you try your hardest, what it would be like to be part of a minority group in America. In some sense, it's much easier to say "Well...my hair's hard to manage too, so we're not that different" than to acknowledge the difference. In the end it winds up being dismissive and insensitive, even if it wasn't intentional. There's strength, growth, and wisdom in acknowledging our differences and actually listening to the stories of those with different experiences, rather than trying to pretend they're not there.
Sorry for the length. Brevity is not my strong suit. In retrospect, I hope you weren't asking a rhetorical question...
10/01/09
10/01/09
People with the power of the majority (I make the distinction so that mixed people can be included in the discussion) can get terribly defensive.
Since I've found the defensiveness to be a remarkably consistent thread, irrespective of whether the actual issue is Black womens' hair, or Patricia Wrede's book, or GatesGate, I usually refer them here
[www.google.com]
to see if, when as "majority race" people, they say they want to understand, or be educated, they're really serious.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
It's one thing to empathize by saying "Shit...that must be really hard" and saying "Oh I totally know how you feel" (I'm exaggerating the difference and not implying that you do these things--I don't know you at all). I think many people are afraid to acknowledge the discomfort of actually addressing the differences/privilege that come with being in the majority status, so they use "Me too!" as a way to wash away the difference.
10/01/09
I'm not sure about this "reach out and touch" thing. So you have this impulse to reach out and touch everything that looks soft and interesting? People's hair isn't like clothing on a rack. Touch away, in the case of the latter. What right do you have to touch another person's hair because you, personally, find it soft and interesting?
10/01/09
Then if it's rude by your own admission, why do you keep doing it??
NG: "But... my issues with my hair are what make me able to understand the situation in general."
But everyone here already KNOWS about those issues, because all-white is the majority culture.
What I think people are saying here is that you don't have to GIVE your opinion when other people are trying to offer a different perspective. You can JUST. LISTEN.
NG: "Are you really saying that no one but a black woman can possibly have an opinion about black women's issues?"
No.
But how about if you stop trying to OFFER and INSERT your opinion and JUST. LISTEN.
It never ceases to boggle my mind how majority women can tell men who insist on constantly butting into feminist discussions with their own opinion to JUST LISTEN but *completely fail* to see how that same directive might still apply when other women are talking.
Does this make it clearer? At all?
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
On the other hand, from a purely cosmetic stand point (and I understand that bringing it down to tangible, touchable hair and products is part of the problem), telling, say, a curly-haired Asian woman who spends thousands on straightening or a Jewish woman who relaxes and bleaches her hair that they couldn't possibly understand what it's like for black women who feel the need to conform and therefore can't contribute anything but sympathy is pretty dismissive.
10/01/09
This.
I used your own quotes.
Just think about that for a minute.
(Note: "Think" does NOT mean "I am compulsively required to respond.")
10/01/09
*rolleyes*
10/01/09
No matter what the outer manifestation of the issue -- hair, GatesGate, SciFi, cultural appropriation -- the defensive/denial reponse remains the same.
All I ever request is that people read before opening their mouths, as opposed to just reflexively jumping in and yapping on.
I reiterate, majority women do tend to see it when men do it. They don't see that they themselves are doing it when other women are talking.
IMO, it's a dominant assumption of privileged culture that no matter what the topic at hand, people just HAVE to hear your opinion.
10/01/09
[www.google.com]
The links on allies, response, and derailing may interest you particularly.
Also, this:
www.derailingfordummies.com
Because none of what she said or how she said it is new. It's been seen, said, and done before.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
EDUCATE YOURSELF. It is not the job of black people to relieve you of your ignorance.
10/01/09
You can start here:
[www.google.com]
10/01/09
Translation: It's YOUR job to make sure I'M not racist! Why don't you people make things better for me?
Some discussion NEEDS to be shut down. No wonder women of color shun feminism in mass droves.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
First, if you actually read my comment to you, I said none of that.
Way to be defensive, jump to conclusions, and prove the point, though.
(Also, neither of us knows what race -- or mix of races -- the other is, or what privilege the other one might be carrying, do they? A lot of assumptions here?)
10/01/09
You told a poster she didn't have to give her (yes, naive) perspective she should just listen. It would be helpful if posters knew, ahead of time, whose opinion was valid in every discussion. So no Jewish women in posts about Jewish women, no lesbians in posts about heterosexuality, and so forth.
Lord knows there's been no problem shutting people down before based on stupid comments or unpopular views, but for the most part they aren't told they shouldn't bother writing in at all. (Disemvowelling is another story.)
10/01/09
10/01/09
Are you comparing black women feeling excluded from feminism to men not wanting to be a part of feminism?
Seriously?
10/01/09
I think she should also watch her tone. I'm feeling attacked. ;-)
10/01/09
For the most part, I have enjoyed the content of this thread and really enjoyed the documentary itself. This specific mixing of threads, of hair touching and people's attempts to educate others without knowing their background, somewhat less.
Here is a recent one: [jezebel.com]
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
And the amount of product it takes to have "natural" hair? Takes me just as long to wear it natural as it does to wear it straight.
Cosign! If you want to go natural, great. I would suggest the "big chop". But anybody who tries to convince you that it's so easy and more convenient than permed hair is a damn lie. It takes me nearly 90 minutes and THREE big bath towels just to wash and dry my hair.
10/01/09
*In my area of the south, this was the case. By no means am I saying that all black women share my background.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Preach it.
And the Carol's Daughter Honey Hair Mimosa stuff is great for hair like ours.
10/01/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
I think that my appreciation for afros is wildly affected by the cultural cues that black women's hair--all women's hair, really--signify. I always hated my hair because people thought I was dumb, and silly, and would really really like boys. Indeed, I am smart, mean, and have been called a man hater more times than I can count. Afros do look mean to me--not mean, really, but more like bad-ass. Afros say, "I wear my hair this way and refuse to submit to racist rules about what is appropriate and what isn't." It is not cool for me to ascribe complex attitudes towards society and self to someone because of their fucking hair. It's fucking racist, actually. But as much as I am annoyed and disheartened by my own response, I cannot deny that I have always and will always think that afros look bad ass. I value, highly, the cultural signification afros have, and it's well nigh impossible, at this point, for me to suss out what's attractive to me because of fucked up stereotypes, and what would exist in a world in which our hair did not affect our ability to get hired.
Here's the other thing, though--I totally cut my hair short in order to signify something about myself (ie I'm not barbie). Lots of people are attracted to fashion because it's a way to express one's self, etc. Isn't hair the same way? Can we ever fully divorce a hairstyle from cultural meaning? I am uncomfortable with the implication of associating a certain style (long, short, pink, blue, weave, natural) with personality traits or preferences. But I'm also uncomfortable with the idea that what we wear makes a statement about who we are--so I tend to skip the "fashion" posts on Jezebel.
Obviously, the above paragraph must be tempered by the understanding that problems with black women's hair especially, and other races' women's hair to a lesser but still significant extent, are currently inscribed in racist, sexist, classist ways. So an afro means you're an angry black lady, long blonde hair means you're a dumb barbie doll, red hair means you're a devil child, etc. The big problem with hair and style now is how incredibly biased they are against marginalized groups, and how they perpetuate these bigoted stereotypes, and affect people's ability to get hired. But can we keep the idea of hair "as a statement" without continuing to uphold the fucked uped-ness that comes with the statements hairstyles can make? Or do we need to retire the idea of style and be all Star Trek: TNG until the revolution is done with, then when all the shitty -isms of the world are dead we can get back to inscribing meaning into hairstyles?
09/30/09
You can, but you would be wrong. Unless you LIKE the idea of being seen as dirty, unkempt and threatening just because you wear your hair in its natural state, and you LIKE the idea of being threatened with unemployment because you don't wish to burn or fry your hair straight, or you LIKE names like "African booty scratcher", "Ubangi", and "pickaninny".
Afros say, "I wear my hair this way and refuse to submit to racist rules about what is appropriate and what isn't."
Funny...that's not what my Afro is telling you. Perhaps you should stop taking your cues from Soul Cinema Sundays, jive turkey.
10/01/09
10/01/09
"Funny...that's not what my Afro is telling you. Perhaps you should stop taking your cues from Soul Cinema Sundays, jive turkey."
I'm sorry--this was the point I was attempting to make. That various signifiers have meanings ascribed to them, and then we ascribe those meanings to those things. So an afro "says" something in our culture, just like a miniskirt says something, or glasses say something, or having a dog instead of a cat. They all have these arbitrary meanings, but as a part of the culture, as a person who has been told what the meanings of various things are, I reflexively interpret these things as their meanings, even though that's ridiculous.
And by the grass is greener thing, I meant that by saying that I think [x], in this case afros, is aesthetically pleasing to me, I have put that thing and myself in a fantasy world, in which [x] is nice simply because I think it's nice, and in which [x] has no drawbacks because I don't know about them. A far, far less consequential example is someone who always wanted glasses, but never realized that if you have glasses they'll fog up in the winter in a very annoying way.
So, even though I knew, inasmuch as a white person can know anything about the black experience, that is to say not actually knowing as much as attempting to learn, process, and understand, that there are significant negative consequences of afros, I still thought/think that afros are cool looking. The one black girl in my high school who had an afro had, in my opinion, the best hair in the school. It wasn't until my original comment that I realized that that particular trait of mine was probably, especially because I am white and therefore subject to lots of racism*, white privilege, and unintentional, unrecognized, and internalized racist assumptions of any non-white people, deeply effected by what I saw signified in her hair--what it signified to the dominant culture, of which I have been raised.
So now what?** It's not like recognizing that my aesthetic sensibilities have been affected by--maybe entirely the result of--racist attributions and assumptions, makes me think afros aren't cool. So how do I react to recognizing this particular strain of racism in my self? Even if the result is a relative positive--I think afros are cool-- it's the result of and inevitably perpetuating a racist stereotype of black women and hair, and even if I find that stereotype (or the vague form of it that's subconsciously affecting my tastes) valuable or attractive, it isn't good to be partaking in these cultural codes. If I reflexively and subconsciously associate afros with Angry Black Lady, but then I associate Angry Black Lady with things that are good***, then even if I think both subjects are good, which subverts the dominant code of those two things as bad or whatever, it's still working on the assumption that Angry Black Lady exists outside of the imaginations of angry American right-wing conservative activists. Like, say, in my imagination. Even if I recognize that that is totally fucked up and racist and also really stupid. It's just--I don't think, for me, recognizing that makes it go away from my brain. Just like thinking that my life would be better if I was skinnier doesn't go away from my brain even though I know that's fucked up and incorrect, or catholic morality doesn't go away from my brain just because I've decided that I don't believe in god.
[...and this version is not as good as the first, and is a lot longer. Sorry.]
*not racism like subject to racism against white people, but to being a member of the dominant class, which has not only left me with the white privilege that I have in the world but has constituted me as a white person who has white privilege even if suddenly everybody was blind and we couldn't see race, a privilege which inevitably makes me racist in a thousand thousand ways merely by virtue of being a white person who was taught that she was white.
**Rhetorical questions, though feel free to chime in if you have thoughts. But I recognize that dealing with my racism is my responsibility, and expecting anyone to answer these questions for me is both lazy and privileged.
***I love any angry lady, actually.
10/01/09
10/01/09
Then stop, or at least make a conscious effort to. It doesn't get any simpler than that. That soliloquy you just spent all that time writing could've been spent asking yourself why you associate a hairstyle with a very unflattering stereotype. This is a depiction that has long hurt black women - in the media, at work, dating...my God, we're the very reason why the "tone" argument exists. Even worse, you justify your thinking with "well, I think Angry Black Women" are cool, as if anybody should give a shit, let alone the women you're fetishizing.
If I told you that I associate blond hair with dick-sucking white bimbos who have a fetish for big black dicks, wouldn't you tell me to go to hell? If I justified my douchebag theory with "well, that's just what I'm conditioned to think", wouldn't you tell me to pull my head out of my ass? I certainly hope you would.
When I go into work tomorrow, I have to wonder if the new boss I'll be seeing DOES equate my hair with being some kind of jive talking pseudo-revolutionary that secretly hates The Man. I have to worry about whether he'll tell me that my hair is out of dress code - which the powers that be like to do in places where dress codes are common. If I choose to wrap it in a head scarf instead, I get to worry if they'll make me take it off, making some stupid claim about headgear. I get to worry about whether I'll hear things like "chill out, girlfriend!" or "you people are so senstive" or "calm down, Omarosa!" or a long list of shit you couldn't think off if I paid you to try, things that I hear all of the fucking time, things that I either have to swallow to keep the peace or speak out and bring unwanted eyes upon me. Best of all, I get to wonder if I'll be deemed the Angry Black Woman - that character you love so much - because I'm not changing or taking off or ignoring jack shit. Privilege is a wonderful thing. You admit that you've put yourself in a fantasy world. I can't even imagine what that's like if I wanted to. Keep that in mind when you're justifying your way of thinking. And Google the Sapphire stereotype while you're at it and see just how flattering it truly is.
10/01/09
"Then stop, or at least make a conscious effort to. It doesn't get any simpler than that. That soliloquy you just spent all that time writing could've been spent asking yourself why you associate a hairstyle with a very unflattering stereotype."
Uh, clearly that's what she is doing - examining her own head for unthinking racisms and picking them apart. Race is a complicated thing, and she's owning her place of privilege and working out the issues of race that most white people are never obliged to confront. Screaming at her while she's trying to work these things out only encourages her to be silent, to push the difficult problems under again, because it's safer to not think about them and just let them lie unexamined where they continue to do damage.
(said as a biracial girl who looks white so gets the short ends of both fucking sticks when it comes to discussion of race)
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
It was probably inappropriate to bring this up here, in public and more specifically in this thread, when I should have been dealing with it personally. I genuinely am sorry, both for the fact that I am inadvertently contributing to the shit in the world and for the fact that I dropped it here and offended you. Please accept my apology, if you want to, or not, if you don't want to. And thank you for your help.
10/01/09
So, can you explain what else she has to do before she is examining her privilege to an acceptable degree?
10/01/09
Then you'll jizz in your pants over my outright dismissing. Cimorene ASKED me for my opinion and I gave it to her.
10/01/09
I would just caution you to remember that even "positive" stereotypes (e.g. "but I LOVE angry black women") are harmful, and can read as really condescending.
10/01/09
09/30/09
10/01/09