Oh for straight hair. I cut my curls off a few months ago and have been growing it back out since. The combination of gigantic, very insistent curls and short hair leaves me looking like I stuck my finger in an electrical socket.
I would love, love LOVE if someone (I'm talking to you scientists) would figure out a way to make my thick, tangely, straight hair into curls that would actually stay. *sigh* It's my dream...
I am still slightly bewildered--20 years after the '80s--to hear that straight hair is considered desirable by a large section of the population. Some part of my brain still equates "straight" with "limp and thin" and wants to rush out for a spiral perm, go to town on my bangs with a curling iron, and mousse myself into oblivion.
Can they use this discovery to help straight-hairs like me get some body and curls? I would pay for that. People think that because my hair is stick-straight I can just wash it and go. Ha. Not unless I want to have limp, street-urchin style locks. I would kill for wavy hair, for serious. At least then I could straighten it if I really wanted it straight. They have not made the hot roller or curling iron that can put a curl in my hair.
Hair - we all lose!
I wouldn't have a problem with taking a pill to make my curly hair straight -- provided its effects weren't permanent. Given that hair grows so slowly, of course, it'd be a several-year commitment, but I'd really enjoy getting to spend some time with straight hair without the hassle -- and damage to my hair -- of a straightening iron.
And could we-the-commenters maybe stop bringing up cancer and AIDS every time we read about some more frivolous application of science? It seems to me like all genetic research contributes to the greater body of important scientific knowledge -- and as for partnering with a major cosmetics company, how exactly do people think all this research gets paid for?
What's more, it's absurd to imply that every scientist ought to devote her life to curing deadly diseases. Science has innumerable applications, and it's as ludicrous to hold all scientists responsible for solving the world's ten biggest problems (as determined by who?) as it would be to mandate that I study science instead of English because I'm good at both and science is more important.
@special_boots: Agreed. I would also add that many frivolous applications of drugs are actually failed attempts at cures for non frivolous ailments. Just look at Latisse, it was originally developed to treat glaucoma and now it is just treating us all to never ending Brooke Shields commercials and nightmares of stained lids and eyes turned brown!
After many years struggling with the fact that I will never be able to have a pixie cut or even short hair (without having to straighten it) I have come to terms with my curls. They are a part of me and I love them. There is nothing wrong with my hair!
But, should I get the urge to have smooth hair for a few days, I turn to my trusty flatiron. It works wonders, even on my corkscrew curls.
@the dodo, the cuckoo, and the nene: I'm the same way. It took a good 25 years, but I've finally grown to love my curls. But sometimes I still prefer to wear my hair straight and I'd pay good money for a miracle straightener.
@Twizzgirl: Yeah, I just don't like the idea of chemically messing with my hair. Maybe if it was a temporary thing, like those semi permanent hair dyes. Then perhaps I'd do it, because it takes way too long for me to straighten my hair by myself, and those Japanese hair straightening treatments are way too expensive.
Don't we already have straighteners? I have to say as a woman with ridonk curly hair, I do appreciate anything that will help me straighten my hair is less time.
I hate curly hair (on me).
This gene is responsible for hair curliness in those of European descent -- according to the article, different genes are at play in other races. And their findings only account for ~6% of variation in hair morphology.
Oh my. Knowing how angry I get when curly hair is straightened in movies as part of the "hottification" Makeover Process, I don't think I can follow that link. My brain will explode. Or liquefy. Or somesuch.
It's my celeb doppleganger! Scary, how much we resemble each other. Ms. Peters has a diff. jawline (plus oodles of singing and acting talent), but other than that, spot on.
Love love love that she rarely straightens her hair if it's not for a role. Power to the Curl (shakes fist)!
@likepenguins: Aw, thanks very much. It helps to make up for that period of time called "the 90s', when walking around with my hair in its natural state would cause open staring and/or derisive remarks ala "She really should get her hair done professionally. Or just get a hair cut, gawd!", when they really meant get a blow out. Glad to see the style pendulum has swung back towards whatever works for the individual.
Every time I read about one of these studies--like the ones devoted to improving cock-hardening pills, isolating curly hair genes, or creating soggy pork on a petri dish--I am thankful that our scientists have nothing more important to research, now that cancer and AIDS are taken care of.
@Tchotchke: Ah, yes, because all scientists have a moral obligation to devote themselves to solving the world's most serious problems. I mean, geez, why did you even become a scientist if you didn't want to cure AIDS?
@Tchotchke: Because gosh, it sucks that people are allowed to do research in the areas that interest them intellectually, like proteins, instead of only working on viruses or cancer! They're all science so the knowledge and interests should be totally transferable, right? And what is with people thinking they should be allowed to be writers, don't they know the world needs more scientists and teachers? Why even BREATHE if you're not working on curing cancer?
@special_boots: My point is that I was just kidding around and neither said, nor did, anything to warrant your sarcasm. The fact that I called erectile disfunction medication "cock-hardening pills" should have been a big tip-off. I tried to make a joke. Period. If it failed or somehow offended you and InABook, then I guess it wasn't a good one.
However, you have written the same exact thing in a number of other threads, and after a while, it becomes tedious. With that said, I am leaving this thread because I post on Jezebel for fun, not to argue with people who decide to pick fights.
@Tchotchke: I'm not picking a fight. I think you missed what I was saying.
Of course it's evident that you were making a joke. What's less clear is the point your joke was trying to make. I'll break it down for you:
1. Level one: semantic content. Since AIDS and cancer have been cured, scientists are now free to work on more frivolous projects.
2. Level two: propositional content. Of course, AIDS and cancer haven't actually been cured; thus your sarcasm indicates irritation with the fact that scientists are spending time on things that you see as obviously less important.
3. Level three: ???
Your response to @inabook and me would seem to indicate that you intended a third level of content to the joke, but what that content might be is unclear (as is obvious from the responses you got, none of which appear to respond to this third level).
It's rather disingenuous of you to respond to the replies you dislike by saying, "I was joking." It's obvious that you were joking. It's much less obvious what you might have been trying to say.
Jezebel is very fun, but it can also be a forum for real discussion. Blowing off a valid line of questioning isn't taking the high road -- it's just taking the easy but somewhat frustrating road.
I plan to get this book. Has anybody heard much about it? Amazon only has one review.
I know that Aristotle was an intelligent fellow.... I guess.... but I'm so glad I learned, before today, that he was a misogynist ass who made a terrible influence on society.
I'm sure there are more things to be said than that on the subject of Aristotle/ misogyny/ patriarchy but all I can say at the moment is "misogynist ass". #themarveloushairygirls
@unmoldednicole: most of ancient greek society was misogynistic. wives and daughters were relegated to the domestic parts of the house and not allowed to enter the parts where the men entertained themselves with philosophical debate and hookers. unless you were a spartan woman, in which case you had more economic and social freedom than the spartan men, but you still couldn't vote on anything. so yeah...the lineage from ancient Greece to modern Ed Hardy D-Bag is quite clear.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I call it "Poodle Perm Dysphoria Syndrome."
12/07/09
Hair - we all lose!
12/07/09
And could we-the-commenters maybe stop bringing up cancer and AIDS every time we read about some more frivolous application of science? It seems to me like all genetic research contributes to the greater body of important scientific knowledge -- and as for partnering with a major cosmetics company, how exactly do people think all this research gets paid for?
What's more, it's absurd to imply that every scientist ought to devote her life to curing deadly diseases. Science has innumerable applications, and it's as ludicrous to hold all scientists responsible for solving the world's ten biggest problems (as determined by who?) as it would be to mandate that I study science instead of English because I'm good at both and science is more important.
Geez.
12/07/09
Says the person whose thesis changed 12 times in the course of 2 years.
12/07/09
12/07/09
But, should I get the urge to have smooth hair for a few days, I turn to my trusty flatiron. It works wonders, even on my corkscrew curls.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I hate curly hair (on me).
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Because it's all for you, of course, and making you you-nique.
12/07/09
Love love love that she rarely straightens her hair if it's not for a role. Power to the Curl (shakes fist)!
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
However, you have written the same exact thing in a number of other threads, and after a while, it becomes tedious. With that said, I am leaving this thread because I post on Jezebel for fun, not to argue with people who decide to pick fights.
12/07/09
Of course it's evident that you were making a joke. What's less clear is the point your joke was trying to make. I'll break it down for you:
1. Level one: semantic content. Since AIDS and cancer have been cured, scientists are now free to work on more frivolous projects.
2. Level two: propositional content. Of course, AIDS and cancer haven't actually been cured; thus your sarcasm indicates irritation with the fact that scientists are spending time on things that you see as obviously less important.
3. Level three: ???
Your response to @inabook and me would seem to indicate that you intended a third level of content to the joke, but what that content might be is unclear (as is obvious from the responses you got, none of which appear to respond to this third level).
It's rather disingenuous of you to respond to the replies you dislike by saying, "I was joking." It's obvious that you were joking. It's much less obvious what you might have been trying to say.
Jezebel is very fun, but it can also be a forum for real discussion. Blowing off a valid line of questioning isn't taking the high road -- it's just taking the easy but somewhat frustrating road.
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/31/09
10/30/09
I know that Aristotle was an intelligent fellow.... I guess.... but I'm so glad I learned, before today, that he was a misogynist ass who made a terrible influence on society.
I'm sure there are more things to be said than that on the subject of Aristotle/ misogyny/ patriarchy but all I can say at the moment is "misogynist ass". #themarveloushairygirls
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09