I totally agree that contraception is necessary, and since it isnt universally available or 100% effective, abortion is too. But really what the Church wants is for us to recognize that when we prevent/terminate pregnancy, that could have been our kid. A kid they would prefer we had in wedlock, so the sex is about love as well as...sex.
Clearly everyone here knows the catholic church is not the only right way to live, because its a personal choice. Personally, I am "catholic" in the sense that I go to church 2x a year and i got confirmed in 8th grade, etc. And i still have premarital sex, big woop. So to everyone who hates the church: don't be part of it then. At least in the US, the church isnt going to do anything to get in your way.
@ks1867: "At least in the US, the church isnt going to do anything to get in your way."
Well, unless they chip away at our abortion and contraception rights, bit by bit. It's already much harder to get the morning after pill, pharmacists don't HAVE to give people birth control in some areas if they are morally against it, and abortions are illegal in many places - and that is because of the church. Church and state SHOULD be separate in our country, but that is not always the case. There is no reason to outlaw abortion EXCEPT for religious reasons, which should have nothing to do with our laws - but they often do.
So yes, in many ways the church is getting in the way of the rights of women.
@RiloKilo: EXACTLY. It's easy to say, "If you don't agree with [insert any religions here], then don't practice it." But the reality is that MANY legislators and people in charge of our laws think that their religious beliefs should guide law-making in this country. It's effing scary, to be honest. And I'm a Christian!
I have a question: what happens when we, the pro-choice, have to point out the obvious -- no matter how much birth control we have, we're never reducing abortions to zero? Or even just to "worthy" abortions?
Because we're not.
Pro-lifers tend to win these arguments because very few pro-choicers defend "women who make bad choices" when it comes to abortion. The general idealism that if only everyone had BC, we'd never have an abortion that isn't caused by rape or health issues is dangerous, because it shifts the ground and supposes that pro-choicers are tacitly agreeing that all things being equal, women shouldn't get abortions, or there's something wrong about it.
Whereas I think, "all things being equal, it's none of our damn business." I might think the multiple-abortion lady is being dumb and needs to learn the virtues of condoms, but that thought should have no impact on law, because on a legal and social level, what I think shouldn't matter to someone else's rights to bodily integrity.
@jeninmotion: I think you're making a great point. But I don't know about anyone implying that, with BC on every nightstand and condoms on every penis, women shouldn't get abortions except in the cases you mentioned. I just think we assume, in a perfect world, most women would choose their accessible, free/inexpensive BC as a first option. After all, abortions are expensive and, at the very least, an uncomfortable morning in stirrups. Though maybe in this perfect world we're imagining, chocolate shakes would trigger abortions and they'd feel like multiple orgasms??
PS. I say this as someone who had an abortion due to BC failure, so I know that even with 100 percent accessibility to BC, abortions are going to be important and women SHOULD be getting them if that's their decision.
Urgggh. Catholics make me angry. In catholic school, the teachers always said stuff along the lines of abstinence is the best (and only expectable) form of contraception. It would just make my head hurt because it is such an illogical and false statement. Contraception is by definition a way to prevent pregnancy and/or gestation while being sexual active.
What sort of creative ways can these people think of to prevent abortions? There are no magical uterus gnomes that will fight to keep a 10 week old fetus inside a women who wants and has access to an abortion. Human sexuality isn’t a creative writing class. it is freakin common sense and an understanding of biology. But hey, I guess if you believe in transubstantiation you will believe in "creative" forms of birth control.
When I did volunteer work in Tanzania the church was a problem and frustrated us constantly.
What was laughable is that every different village was essentially owned by some religion. Whoever came in with the money - well that is the religion to which you converted. In one of my homestays the father went to church every Sunday (he was Lutheran) and thought the name came from MLK. He also said he doesn't believe in God because why would a God allow children to suffer. When you have conversations like that and then can't do condom demos because of the church. *aargh* I got the impression that all that mattered was people saying they were the religion, not that they actually were.
This was just my, albeit limited, experience. But it did not engender a love of organized religion.
This shit makes my head spin. Not like dizzy-spin, but Exorcist-spin. Anyway. Let's look at all the facts, shall we? Ok. Nobody likes abortion. But it's necessary, and should be easily and safely obtained. Know why? Because the sixteen year old girl who gets pregnant by accident, and the woman who gets pregnant by way of rape, and the woman who has carefully planned and anxiously awaited her pregnancy only to find out something is horribly wrong should all be given a better option than "God will provide." That's not an acceptable answer when we're talking about a situation that has enormous life-ruining potential. A woman who does not want children should not be made out to be a wicked fornicator; a woman whose high-risk pregnancy, if carried out, will kill her should not be made out to be a murderer. Yes, birth control is a good thing. It's responsible and safe and can prevent unwanted pregnancies from ever happening. It should be available to anyone who might want it. But it's not always 100% effective, and not every wanted pregnancy works out happily for everyone. It's situations like these in which abortion is the better option, the safer option, for everyone involved. Much better and safer than, say, the old hire-someone-to-beat-you-so-as-to-induce-miscarriage option.
I'm done. If anyone wants me I'll be under my desk.
@Aesop's Foibles. YES.: Well put. I'm with everything except "Nobody likes abortion." I DO like it. It's a procedure that gave me control over my body when I was scared and felt I had lost control. I don't want to schedule one for every fourth Sunday. It's not, like, enjoyable. But I'll never say it's shameful or anything less than an empowering option.
@JerseyGrrrl: Hear, hear. It does a hell of a lot of good for a woman who doesn't want to be a mother and a potential-child who won't be brought into abject poverty, abuse or neglect, gross parental immaturity, etc etc. I LIKE abortion, too.
Even my tried and true Irish Catholic, I-didn't-vote-for-Al-Gore-because-he-was-Pro-Life grandmother supported contraception. According to my mom, as devout she was and as much as she believed in the Catholic Church, she knew that contraception was necessary and the best solution.
I remember hearing awful, downright horrible stories about how the children at the orphanage I worked at in South Africa ended up there. It only made me realize that one thing that will greatly change things is sex education and birth control.
Parental consent laws make me insane, because the SCOTUS really fucked up there. There is NO FUCKING WAY parental consent or notification is not an undue burden. Oh, but there's judicial bypass! Super, so the girl can get the abortion EVENTUALLY, but has to potentially destroy her relationship with her parents. Fuck you, Casey decision.
@Maritsa: It's so funny (read: telling) that you don't need your parents' permission to continue a pregnancy or give birth. I mean come on! The same argument could be made that a parent "deserves to know" what health care decisions the daughter makes but no one requires a pregnant 17 year old to go before a judge and get permission to give birth.
@Maritsa: Riiiiiiight? What I hate most about the undue burden standard is that it means that courts have the power to adjudicate how women ought to feel. Insane.
@TheGuvnah: The idea that it's about parents giving consent for medical procedures is so fucking transparently false. Once the baby pops out, you get to decide how to raise it if you keep it, but when it's inside, your parents get to control you. Oh, and do they require parental consent for a C-section? No? Interesting. It's almost like the only reason parental consent laws exist is to stop teenagers from getting abortions!
@PilgrimSoul: It's not like I like the Roe trimester system, but the undue burden standard is basically useless. Well, I just don't think that asking a 15-year-old to ask her religious parents for consent is an undue burden. Geez, if they say no, she can just march down to the courthouse and get a judge to grant it! I mean, judges in states with parental consent laws are super liberal, so it's no burden. And God knows the legal system is SO easy to navigate, she'll have no problems at all!
Also, I just looked at a map of states with parental consent and notification laws, and I think I'm going to have an aneurysm.
@Maritsa: Also, it's SO easy for a fifteen-year-old to figure out how judicial bypass works, get to the court when she can't even drive, and explain her position to the judge on this. No burden at all!
@TheGuvnah: That's a very good point. Not sure why that double standard never occurred to me before. And you'd think giving birth would be a decision with many more potential ramifications, you know? Like, um, a human life?
My mother has said of abortion: "Well, you can never un-have a child, but you can very likely get pregnant again at some point if you decide to do it."
"We need to be much more creative in assisting women with supportive services so they don't need to resort to the unnatural act of abortion." An interesting quote, because if I actually believed that they meant it, we might have some common ground to work with. Of course, there'd be disagreements with the "unnatural" part, but imagine if pro-lifers actually did work to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, therefore reducing both the number of women who suffered from them and -- bonus for lifers! -- the number of abortions. However, pro-lifers never want to talk honestly about contraception, so that quote actually turns out to be a lie. "Creativity" doesn't actually allow for them to see reality, apparently.
@ccchild: I think more creative solutions might mean working to change cultural norms that say a woman doesn't have ability or right to dictate when she has sex, or with whom.
Condoms are a great solution to avoid pregnancy and the spread of AIDS, assuming you have a husband who gives a crap about your health and well-being. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that men who are bringing HIV home to their wives after having sex with prostitutes don't have too terribly much respect for their wives' autonomy or health.
The downside to NFP is that it only works if both partners are willing and able to make the comittment to practice it. The problem with condoms are that they only work if your husband will agree to wear them. The cultural changes necessary to make condoms accepted could also make NFP a more viable option.
I got pregnant at 16, at a time when my parents and I weren't getting along all that well, so there was no way I could tell them (even though they're super pro-choice). I'm from MA, and they actually do have a parental consent law, (weird, right?) so I had to trek up to NH for my abortion.
Guess what I'm saying is that I'm thankful that NE is a small area... I can't imagine being in that situation miles and miles and hours and hours away from a legal, safe, confidential abortion provider.
Final note: How can you argue with those statistics???????????? Goddamn.
@windupbird: Glad it worked out for you. Like you say, its lucky NE is relatively easy to travel. Think of the young girl in Mississippi or some other large state out west. trapped.
@bluebears: Glad you mentioned Mississippi. We have ONE abortion provider ONE!!!!! And it's in Hattiesburg which is dead center in the middle of the state and only open regular business hours. Tell me how a scared teenager is supposed to navigate that shit?
@HannahBethD: I know, ever since I learned that fact several years ago I bring it up constantly. It shocks people but people should know that for thousands of Americans access to abortion is a total myth.
@bluebears: That's not even getting into how restrictive the state's abortion laws are to begin with! I had a scare a few weeks ago and even though I'm an able-bodied, grown-ass woman, it would have still been a challenge to get the procedure done.
@windupbird: I think people don't argue them. I've heard people say that murder and rape will always occur, but that's no reason to legalize them. Well all accept that they're still crimes. As do radical anti-choice activists of abortion.
This is NOT my opinion. I'm restating what I've heard argued.
I never understood why a large portion of people who were against abortion were not for more accessible birth control and quality sex education. Instead, we get abstinence-only education, and barriers to contraception and emergency contraception.
@Roeroica: Because it's not just about abortion to many people, it's about sex. They don't want it to be "easier" to have sex and ignore the fact that things like abstinence-only ed don't make sex go away, they just make it riskier when it happens.
@Roeroica: Because traditional Catholic views don't see any value in sex other than procreation. Anything than prevent sex from being just about the procreation means that the person engaging in that act is submitting to their base, carnal, and "unGodly" desires.
@cate3710: I'm going to blame Our Heavenly Father for this conundrum. If he hadn't made sex so freakin fun, abstinence only education would be really effective.
@schweppes: That's not true. I hear this claim all the time and drives me nuts. The Church's view on human sexuality may be pie in the sky idealism that only work in fantasy land, but it's also far more nuanced than sex= only for making babies.
The RCC holds that sex is by it's nature both unitive and procreative, and that those two functions should not be separated. Thus, under Catholic teaching, it is every bit as sinful to have sex strictly to conceive and not out of love for your spouse as it is to have sex while using contracpetion.
Not like you'll ever hear any rabid pro-lifers say as much, but in Catholic teaching, love of one's spouse is every bit as essential as the procreative potential of sex.
@lizdexia: You're right, but in the context of answering a question about why contraception is against church policy, I was trying to explain it simply. But, yes, the church presumes love in a marriage.
@schweppes: It may be a simple answer, but it's an incorrect one.
I think the Church is dead wrong in stubbornly opposing contraception, but the logic behind why isn't nearly as cut and dried as "the evil man-run church hates the wimmins and wants babies".
The Church is attempting to call people to a higher standard. If men loved and honored the wives the way the Church idealizes in a marriage, well, we wouldn't have to be worried about AIDS so much. And they'd be willing to work with their wives to plan and time pregnancies in a way that benefits their wives' health. Contraception is a great solution to achieving and intermediary goal, but the problem of women dying in childbirth and of STI's has at least as much with cultural undervaluing of women and children as it does with lack of access to condoms (that a man may or may not consent to wear anyway).
The biggest sin of the Church is that they think in the realm of the spiritual and the ideal, and apparently utterly unable to function in reality. In short, their hearts are in the right places, but man do they allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.
The irony of this is that one could say that the Church's heartless views are alienating many younger members who could grow up to be devout Catholics. It's like the Catholic Church is pregnant with all of these young people waiting to effect real social change and then aborts them from its ranks using prescription strength stupidity.
In places where abortion is not available, like my ow country, it's just a matter of how much money you've got. If you're well off you can have a safe abortion. If you're poor and need an abortion: forget it.
"There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. ... So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often."
@TheGuvnah: I could not agree with you more. The Church brings comfort and strength to many of my family members, and I won't interfere with that as long as they don't interfere with my life.
However, the actions of the leadership are completely unacceptable.
Also (not directed at you, but everyone), please resist the urge to approve or feed trolly comments. You know what I'm sayin?
I had a long semi-awkward talk with my dad about the abortion issue, and how they are really pushing it at his church (I was raised Catholic but don't consider it my church anymore) and all he said about it was that it's easy for the clergy have opinions about an issue that theoretically they'll never have to make a personal decision about. We also were wondering why if Catholics are so against abortion why as many don't come out against war, which is also a pro-life issue, if you think about it. Everyone could benefit from more open-mindedness.
@thelastsara: "why as many don't come out against war,"
Actually not true. When Bush met the late Pope a few years back, John Paul II took the time to criticize him for both the death penalty and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. And if I remember correctly the new Pope has as well. To the best of my knowledge, Catholics tend to be much better at being consistent on these issues.
@EkaterinaBallerina: Yeah, Benedict hasn't been as outspoken as John Paul II about his opposition, but he definitely hasn't approved, either.
Catholic neocons, like any other stripe of neocon, are for the war. But most Catholics, especially Catholics who are involved in issues of social justice, are very much anti-war. I think (and oh god this sounds very sloppy, but I know I saw it) during the election one of the zillions of polls suggested that Catholicity correlated more strongly with anti-war viewpoints, and liberal policies in general, than mainstream/evangelical Protestantism, which skewed more toward pro-war and conservative policymaking.
@SarahMC: This is my point. I should mention that I do recall a very well written piece in the church bulletin by the former pastor who laid out, point by point, why the church is against the Iraq war. But that's where it ended. I just feel like the church as a whole (and I'm including its members in this, not necessarily just the leaders) spends a lot more time focusing on abortion than it does on the wars of recent years. I guess I didn't make that very clear.
@thelastsara: I can tell you from personal experience I've heard countless homilies in the years since 2003 about the war. Obvious, blatant anti-war homilies. I have heard exactly zero anti-abortion homilies. Not a single one. And I wasn't a member of a very liberal church - - - midwest, we thumbed our nose at the "hippie" Catholic church on the other side of town. But abortion wasn't an issue - - - I think it's simply not the case that you have a bunch of militant CATHOLICS running around being anti-abortion - - - it comes from a Pope/upper leadership who are against change, but most of these American anti-abortion individuals aren't Catholics. There are other denominations of Christianity that are far, far more vocally pro-life.
@SarahMC: I go to Mass every Sunday, and I have for years, I've never heard "sermon after sermon" about abortion. Yes, it is sometimes mentioned in the Prayers of the Faithful, but always in the same breath as prayers "to end all war." The Catholic Church's position is that of the "Consistent Life Ethic" - anti-abortion, anti-euthanasia, anti-death penalty and anti-war.
@SarahMC: And in my experience in Catholic schools, we didn't get indoctrinated about how wrong war is, but we sure as hell got indoctrinated about abortion. Oh and my classmate who got arrested for blocking a clinic was lauded as a heroine by the school.
@SarahMC: Which is why comments painting the Entire Catholic Church in a certain light are unfair. And that's all that anyone and their "nice" stories are trying to prove.
@SarahMC: Not a practicing Catholic anymore, but I can say that growing up, the Diocese that our church was a part of was very progressive and never outspoken about the abortion issue. As a matter of fact, our Catholic education director was very objective when talking about abortion and contraception.
On a sad note, my mother tells me that especially with this Pope and their current Bishop, the diocese is is turning more hardline right and isolating a lot of devout parishioners.
I had a parish here in Chicago that I attended for a spell solely based on the aesthetics of the church and the proximity to where I lived at the time. Every. Single. Sermon there was about abortion or birth control or about how women should want babies, always babies babies babies, and how having babies is so awesome, amirite ladies, said the celibate man.
Finally I just got frustrated and left and noticed in the midst of my indignant storming out of mass that that particular church is run by Opus Dei. Oopsie.
In conclusion, do not go to a church run by Opus Dei folks. Stuff gets weird quickly.
@Maritsa: At my Catholic university, the brand of Catholicism that was pervasive there was the hand holding and hugging and going on service trips and joining Teach For America brand of Catholicism. There was much more emphasis on service and selflessness than on what's happening with our genitals.
@morninggloria: Opus Dei to the Catholic Church is like the crazy, lunatic uncle living in a shed who only gets invited to Christmas because everyone knows he won't show up.
@SarahMC: The more I think about it, I do think it has a lot to do with what diocese the church is in. I once walked out during mass at a church is Alexandria, VA because of the abortion sermon. The NOVA diocese is well known for it's hardline right leaning ways. Something very different than you'd experience in say, the Baltimore area diocese.
@schweppes: Except the crazy uncle is freaking rich and somehow has unexplained sway with the mayor. And uh... Dan Brown made him the antagonist in one of his "novels."
@morninggloria: please, please, please don't tell me that you're using a Dan Brown book as some sort of indication for how the Catholic Church actually interacts with Opus Dei.
@schweppes: The nice stories about progressive anti-war priests who don't devote a disproportionate amount of time and energy to abortion are exceptions. That is what I'm trying to say.
@SarahMC: I simply don't understand why you consider them "exceptions" and not the other way around (militant anti-abortionists). That's just unfounded. It's a common assumption, but unfounded.
@schweppes: There are far more Catholic churches that devote a disproportionate amount of time and energy to women's sexuality and reproduction than other issues.
The well-rounded ones are more the exception than the rule these days. I don't know if the priests are trying to out-do each other or what.
@schweppes: And people can tell their stories about their progressive churches but "The Catholic Church" is clearly an obstacle to women's well-being especially in the developing world.
@SarahMC: I think this came up in yesterday's post - but the concept that the Catholic Church has really much power in the developing world outside of a few countries is a misconception. There aren't that many countries (especially in Africa) that are all that willing to change their laws to appease the church. Catholic churches in developing countries are generally more traditional than those elsewhere, but that doesn't mean that they're all that influential in most people's lives.
@SarahMC: I've actually belonged to five different parishes over my career as a Catholic and I've attended quite a few others while traveling, visiting friends, etc. And this has been the case in every one of them. But you can keep generalizing if you want. Unless you'd like to actually talk about specific churches you've attended where all these anti-abortion sermons seem to be happening.
@SarahMC: Other than your generalizations, do you have a single data point or even any first hand experience to speak of? Every statement you've made could have been made by someone who's never been to a Catholic mass.
In my personal experience, as a Catholic, I've found people who make statements like yours have never had any first-hand contact with the Church, so please enlighten us as to your specific experience or research.
@mrs_weasley: Do you really doubt that a lot of churches give these sermons? Because I can point you to two in upstate NY that do so. I'm not saying they are the majority, but they certainly exist.
@IvyArbor: Countless news stories about people being denied communion for voting pro-choice.
This dickhead of a bishop from my hometown ([www.medicalnewstoday.com]).
Notre Dame protesting Obama's speech because he's pro-choice?
Abortion abortion abortion abortion. That's all that matters.
The actions of the Catholic Church when it comes to abortion? Is that not proof enough? They will not accept that contraception is the best route to a lower abortion rate and healthier women.
@Maritsa: But that's exactly the point - they're not the majority. They're what get picked up on the news, and what makes people outraged, but they're not the majority. To paint The Catholic Church and Catholic People with that broad brush is the same as saying that all Muslims are terrorists, etc.
@schweppes: But I don't think anyone knows that they're NOT the majority, either. I can't say they are, because I haven't polled each RCC parish, and neither has anyone else here. Some churches are virulently and vocally anti-abortion, some are not.
And I sincerely disagree that it is anything like saying all Muslims are terrorists. Being very anti-choice and a terrorist are vastly different things. And it's not as if there is no basis for asserting the Catholic Church is anti-choice, when the official position of the RCC is very anti-abortion. There is no similar official edict from Muslims.
@SarahMC: My high school religion class teachers (all nuns) were OBSESSED with contraception and abortion. And talk about nuanced views on contraception and NFP - one teacher told us if a married couple started getting romantic, they HAD to finish the deed with some P-in-V because to do otherwise would be a sin. Oh and we got shown the abortion video.
@SarahMC: Notre Dame invited Obama to speak. The school administration was enthusiastic about his attendance and awarded him an honorary degree. Only 40 students of the 4,000 who graduated opted not to attend commencement. The people that I know, brothers and sisters of classmates of mine, were ecstatic that he was speaking there.
Obama overwhelming won Notre Dame in the 2008 elections. Clinton also won the ND campus in both 1992 and 1996.
The students there are more conservative than your run of the mill college students, but I definitely wouldn't use the student body there to paint a picture of how all of Catholicism is obsessed with women's reproductive systems.
@morninggloria: I wasn't referring to the student body; I worded that wrong.
The Cardinal Newman Society, a group that promotes orthodoxy at Catholic colleges and universities, began the protest.
@SarahMC: Yes, the Catholic Church is against abortion. That is always going to be true. It won't ever change. I'm talking about your point that abortion is ALL the church talks about.
I've lived in a lot of places, so I've attended mass in a lot of areas, and the one time abortion was specifically mentioned was when they were asking parishioners to sign a petition not to lift the partial birth abortion ban in Illinois. And it wasn't harped on, it was a card handed out after mass.
Ironically and interestingly enough, the article you sent suggests that the Vatican asked the bishop you're complaining about to resign.
@Maritsa: I don't doubt that SOME of them do. But "some" does not equal "a lot." They are the exception, not the rule. SarahMC's initial comment was about the Church's "sermon after sermon" against abortion but not against war, and I was just saying, in my experience going to numerous parishes, that hasn't been the case. The Church IS anti-war. It's not a one-trick pony.
@mrs_weasley: I just don't think there is any basis for asserting that "a lot" of churches don't give anti-abortion sermons. None of us here has been to anything approaching a signficant percentage of RCC churches in the U.S., let alone the rest of the world.
I agree that not all RCC parishes do this, and accept others' assertions that their churches don't do this. I just can't agree that the churches who do it are the EXCEPTION, especially when the official RCC stance is so adamantly anti-choice.
@Maritsa: And for the very same reasons you cite in the second sentence of your first paragraph, you can't say that they DO. But it certainly seems to be the exception for people on this thread. The Catholic Church is adamantly a lot of things (the Eucharist = Christ, for example), so all sorts of things get talked about at Mass, not just abortion.
10/14/09
Clearly everyone here knows the catholic church is not the only right way to live, because its a personal choice. Personally, I am "catholic" in the sense that I go to church 2x a year and i got confirmed in 8th grade, etc. And i still have premarital sex, big woop. So to everyone who hates the church: don't be part of it then. At least in the US, the church isnt going to do anything to get in your way.
10/14/09
Well, unless they chip away at our abortion and contraception rights, bit by bit. It's already much harder to get the morning after pill, pharmacists don't HAVE to give people birth control in some areas if they are morally against it, and abortions are illegal in many places - and that is because of the church. Church and state SHOULD be separate in our country, but that is not always the case. There is no reason to outlaw abortion EXCEPT for religious reasons, which should have nothing to do with our laws - but they often do.
So yes, in many ways the church is getting in the way of the rights of women.
10/14/09
10/14/09
How is I'm not christian but am grasping the concept of caring for other people a bit better than you are?
10/14/09
Because we're not.
Pro-lifers tend to win these arguments because very few pro-choicers defend "women who make bad choices" when it comes to abortion. The general idealism that if only everyone had BC, we'd never have an abortion that isn't caused by rape or health issues is dangerous, because it shifts the ground and supposes that pro-choicers are tacitly agreeing that all things being equal, women shouldn't get abortions, or there's something wrong about it.
Whereas I think, "all things being equal, it's none of our damn business." I might think the multiple-abortion lady is being dumb and needs to learn the virtues of condoms, but that thought should have no impact on law, because on a legal and social level, what I think shouldn't matter to someone else's rights to bodily integrity.
10/14/09
PS. I say this as someone who had an abortion due to BC failure, so I know that even with 100 percent accessibility to BC, abortions are going to be important and women SHOULD be getting them if that's their decision.
10/14/09
What sort of creative ways can these people think of to prevent abortions? There are no magical uterus gnomes that will fight to keep a 10 week old fetus inside a women who wants and has access to an abortion. Human sexuality isn’t a creative writing class. it is freakin common sense and an understanding of biology. But hey, I guess if you believe in transubstantiation you will believe in "creative" forms of birth control.
10/14/09
Just sayin'.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Religions like being the alpha wolf.
10/14/09
What was laughable is that every different village was essentially owned by some religion. Whoever came in with the money - well that is the religion to which you converted. In one of my homestays the father went to church every Sunday (he was Lutheran) and thought the name came from MLK. He also said he doesn't believe in God because why would a God allow children to suffer. When you have conversations like that and then can't do condom demos because of the church. *aargh* I got the impression that all that mattered was people saying they were the religion, not that they actually were.
This was just my, albeit limited, experience. But it did not engender a love of organized religion.
10/14/09
10/14/09
I'm done. If anyone wants me I'll be under my desk.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
I remember hearing awful, downright horrible stories about how the children at the orphanage I worked at in South Africa ended up there. It only made me realize that one thing that will greatly change things is sex education and birth control.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Also, I just looked at a map of states with parental consent and notification laws, and I think I'm going to have an aneurysm.
10/14/09
10/14/09
My mother has said of abortion: "Well, you can never un-have a child, but you can very likely get pregnant again at some point if you decide to do it."
10/14/09
10/14/09
I'm guessing the "supportive services" they mean are more along the lines of adoption or those awful 'pregnancy crisis centers'.
10/14/09
Condoms are a great solution to avoid pregnancy and the spread of AIDS, assuming you have a husband who gives a crap about your health and well-being. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that men who are bringing HIV home to their wives after having sex with prostitutes don't have too terribly much respect for their wives' autonomy or health.
The downside to NFP is that it only works if both partners are willing and able to make the comittment to practice it. The problem with condoms are that they only work if your husband will agree to wear them. The cultural changes necessary to make condoms accepted could also make NFP a more viable option.
10/14/09
Guess what I'm saying is that I'm thankful that NE is a small area... I can't imagine being in that situation miles and miles and hours and hours away from a legal, safe, confidential abortion provider.
Final note: How can you argue with those statistics???????????? Goddamn.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
This is NOT my opinion. I'm restating what I've heard argued.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
The RCC holds that sex is by it's nature both unitive and procreative, and that those two functions should not be separated. Thus, under Catholic teaching, it is every bit as sinful to have sex strictly to conceive and not out of love for your spouse as it is to have sex while using contracpetion.
Not like you'll ever hear any rabid pro-lifers say as much, but in Catholic teaching, love of one's spouse is every bit as essential as the procreative potential of sex.
10/14/09
10/14/09
I think the Church is dead wrong in stubbornly opposing contraception, but the logic behind why isn't nearly as cut and dried as "the evil man-run church hates the wimmins and wants babies".
The Church is attempting to call people to a higher standard. If men loved and honored the wives the way the Church idealizes in a marriage, well, we wouldn't have to be worried about AIDS so much. And they'd be willing to work with their wives to plan and time pregnancies in a way that benefits their wives' health. Contraception is a great solution to achieving and intermediary goal, but the problem of women dying in childbirth and of STI's has at least as much with cultural undervaluing of women and children as it does with lack of access to condoms (that a man may or may not consent to wear anyway).
The biggest sin of the Church is that they think in the realm of the spiritual and the ideal, and apparently utterly unable to function in reality. In short, their hearts are in the right places, but man do they allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.
10/14/09
10/14/09
It makes me so angry.
10/14/09
"There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. ... So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often."
10/14/09
10/14/09
@ the Catholic church: Nun up; clearly you boys just make a mess of things.
10/14/09
I'm not responding to the insane troll who has also commented here, btw.
10/14/09
However, the actions of the leadership are completely unacceptable.
Also (not directed at you, but everyone), please resist the urge to approve or feed trolly comments. You know what I'm sayin?
10/14/09
10/14/09
Actually not true. When Bush met the late Pope a few years back, John Paul II took the time to criticize him for both the death penalty and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. And if I remember correctly the new Pope has as well. To the best of my knowledge, Catholics tend to be much better at being consistent on these issues.
10/14/09
10/14/09
Catholic neocons, like any other stripe of neocon, are for the war. But most Catholics, especially Catholics who are involved in issues of social justice, are very much anti-war. I think (and oh god this sounds very sloppy, but I know I saw it) during the election one of the zillions of polls suggested that Catholicity correlated more strongly with anti-war viewpoints, and liberal policies in general, than mainstream/evangelical Protestantism, which skewed more toward pro-war and conservative policymaking.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
On a sad note, my mother tells me that especially with this Pope and their current Bishop, the diocese is is turning more hardline right and isolating a lot of devout parishioners.
10/14/09
I had a parish here in Chicago that I attended for a spell solely based on the aesthetics of the church and the proximity to where I lived at the time. Every. Single. Sermon there was about abortion or birth control or about how women should want babies, always babies babies babies, and how having babies is so awesome, amirite ladies, said the celibate man.
Finally I just got frustrated and left and noticed in the midst of my indignant storming out of mass that that particular church is run by Opus Dei. Oopsie.
In conclusion, do not go to a church run by Opus Dei folks. Stuff gets weird quickly.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
However, I went to Georgetown for law school, and campus health services didn't give out condoms or prescribe birth control.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
The well-rounded ones are more the exception than the rule these days. I don't know if the priests are trying to out-do each other or what.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
I was just being humorously obtuse.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
In my personal experience, as a Catholic, I've found people who make statements like yours have never had any first-hand contact with the Church, so please enlighten us as to your specific experience or research.
10/14/09
10/14/09
This dickhead of a bishop from my hometown ([www.medicalnewstoday.com]).
Notre Dame protesting Obama's speech because he's pro-choice?
Abortion abortion abortion abortion. That's all that matters.
The actions of the Catholic Church when it comes to abortion? Is that not proof enough? They will not accept that contraception is the best route to a lower abortion rate and healthier women.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
And I sincerely disagree that it is anything like saying all Muslims are terrorists. Being very anti-choice and a terrorist are vastly different things. And it's not as if there is no basis for asserting the Catholic Church is anti-choice, when the official position of the RCC is very anti-abortion. There is no similar official edict from Muslims.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Obama overwhelming won Notre Dame in the 2008 elections. Clinton also won the ND campus in both 1992 and 1996.
The students there are more conservative than your run of the mill college students, but I definitely wouldn't use the student body there to paint a picture of how all of Catholicism is obsessed with women's reproductive systems.
10/14/09
The Cardinal Newman Society, a group that promotes orthodoxy at Catholic colleges and universities, began the protest.
10/14/09
10/14/09
I've lived in a lot of places, so I've attended mass in a lot of areas, and the one time abortion was specifically mentioned was when they were asking parishioners to sign a petition not to lift the partial birth abortion ban in Illinois. And it wasn't harped on, it was a card handed out after mass.
Ironically and interestingly enough, the article you sent suggests that the Vatican asked the bishop you're complaining about to resign.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
I agree that not all RCC parishes do this, and accept others' assertions that their churches don't do this. I just can't agree that the churches who do it are the EXCEPTION, especially when the official RCC stance is so adamantly anti-choice.
10/14/09