I resent it. I'm smart, poor, and sick. Ykno what they say, the difference between a normal person and a freak is debilitating medical debt, or the fear of it? If I lived in Canada I'd be a completely different person.
So, at what point can we round up these guild-ridden rich people, send them on an island, and let poor people hunt them for prize money? Your quarry comes with its inheritance, trust fund, and stock options. Plus any edible portions of the kill.
Look someone in the eye,
you'll see their eyes are just like yours.
Hold their hand,
it will feel like yours.
Listen to their heart, it beats like yours.
...
I wish people could talk about their problems, their pains, their depressions without the judgement of those listening. It defeats the point of listening...
We all get sad, lonely, depressed. The rich, the poor, the healthy, the sick, the beautiful, the not-so-much. Is is too much to have a touch of empathy? (Anyone see Funny Face? Anyone?)
- this might also be an extension of my mother's comment after I told her about Dahl Kim's death... "Was she too rich and beautiful?"
I have a friend whose father is worth over $10 million dollars. My friend vacations in the Caymans regularly, and takes lots of trips overseas. But every time I start to get a little jealous, I remember that his mother has left her house one time in the past decade, that he is on constant suicide watch for her, that he has dealt with serious depression himself, that his sister was in a seriously abusive relationship, and that his brother's stepchildren were sexually abused. Money doesn't solve all your problems, and sometimes those with money have bigger issues than you can imagine.
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: yeah, i guess my issue with what you said was that (to me, at least) you seemed to be contradicting what @Dictator for Life was saying, when she was making that exact point: your economic status doesn't exempt you from serious pain. it's not like poorer people with the problems DfL described could solve them, if only they had money.
i don't know, i was probably too sensitive. full disclosure: i'm a rich kid with a suicidal dad. i can't imagine going, well dad's in the hospital again...but hey, at least we have the beach houses! money really doesn't make a difference in that type of scenario. #tips
@joutfit: I am sorry to hear about your dad. That truly sux. Mental issues affect whole families and there is so little quality care.
I didn't mean, "well dad's in the hospital again...but hey, at least we have the beach houses!"
But wealth provides a level of cushion and security that people without it don't have
For many people, dad going to the hospital would mean that dad loses his job, they lose their place to live and they wind up on the streets
"well dad's in the hospital again...but thank god that him missing work doesn't mean he will lose his job and we won't have a place to live" is a bad place to be but money provides a backstop that keeps it from being an economic disaster as well as emotionally painful
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: I'm going to agree with both of you. joutfit, I'm so sorry to hear what you're going through. I'm not being flippant; my own father lost his life to suicide. You're absolutely right - money will not make any meaningful difference to how you feel and no-one should attempt to diminish your feelings. Personally, I don't think that's what Poodle's getting at but I know words can be clumsy.
On a purely practical level borrowing money for cabs to the hospital, begging at the bank and relying on handouts is not fun. I've been there. My 2 cents: some financial security will make the practicalities a wee bit easier and that's about it.
@SuzyBee: Thank you for saying what I meant better than I said it. My father died of cancer when I was in hs and it changed *****everything***** from being ok and having enough to total chaos. Money would have helped a lot.
@Dictator for Life: But at least they have the money to take care of those problems. They won't even have to chose between rent and a psychologist's fee, or not take antidepressants because they're $300/mo and their healthcare doesn't cover prescriptions. They can even afford astronomical health insurance premiums despite having a history of poor mental health.
Note: I live in DC, work for a non-profit, and do "charity work". If anyone would like to turn me into an heiress or leave me a large sum of money, I promise I will feel incredibly guilty about it. Try me!
@femme-bot: People who go on and on about "class envy" are usually not poor. It's like people who bring up the words "race war" (who are usually almost always white). There's nothing wrong about resentment. Maybe we need to look at why people are resentful. There's always a reason. Are we not allowed to criticize the rich/powerful? You're neglecting to realize the great imbalances there are between the rich and the poor. The rich aren't going to get harmed if we criticize them.
@Evie Havok: Oh, don't get me wrong, people can criticize the rich, I just think it funny when it's done on Jezebel. It's funny when middle class college educated women complain about other people's privilege. Especially when they include "first world problems" before they rant about their college loans.
It's especially funny that some commenters are getting annoyed that these guys are taking jobs. If this post was about rich kids who do nothing, I bet people would be bitching that they should get jobs.
Is anyone posting here really "poor" especially when compared with the rest of the world? Everyone here has it better than someone, globally, they have it better than most. Really read some of the comments, they're (unintentionally?) hilarious.
@femme-bot: Heh. Well, those types of comments aren't coming from me as I happen to be one of those people taking up internships because I can afford to. While I see their point I'm not about to rail against myself. It's just that "class envy" is such an icky phrase used to derail criticisms about the rich/powerful. I don't know, I think just plain old resentment would do because that's what it is. Resentment=/= envy. Plus, these kidults in the article don't really sound all that great either. They're attention seeking and are trying really hard to get recognition for living like regular old middle-class people.
@Evie Havok: It's hard for me not to think the resentment is envy when people are saying things like (to paraphrase) "if they have so much trouble with this kind of guilt, they can give the money to me". Most of the comments here (on just about every "eat the rich" article) point to envy. There are a couple decent criticisms, and that's about it. The rest are just from people who are annoyed that they don't have the same privileges, and for some reason, they refuse to look at the privilege they have on a global scale.
Wait... so you mean you don't think you're the WORST for taking an internship!? Heh. I mean, what's the solution there? Do people think that if "rich kids" stop taking unpaid internships, suddenly they'd be able to afford to?
@femme-bot: Oh, I've seen those threads and participated in them, as well. I think it's a little bit different when some of these people are actually worthy of mocking and people can't help to think "why do assholes like these have so much money?" That I understand. To me it's just resentment. It's kind of like the resentment I feel toward people with white privilege. Some of the criticisms will be mangled by the resentment felt towards that kind of privilege but it's undeniably resentment not envy. I don't think everyone wants to be supremely wealthy. But they do want to live comfortably well. People just have a really adverse effect against those they see as undeserving of what they have especially if they whine and moan about their good fortune(for example, some of these rich people who let themselves be written about in articles who really aren't making themselves look good).Also, hell no, I don't feel bad about taking internships. If they were in my shoes they'd do the same. I just don't get feeling guilty for being, in my case, upper middle class (which isn't rich at all). Some of these rich people need to get over themselves and stop mentioning/referring to their social class. Really, in real life, it's done wonders for me.
@femme-bot: I get what you're saying. But on a personal note, I grew up very poor and my parents are still pretty fragile, financially. My father used to tell me "well, others have it worse than you, so you have no reason to be upset." That didn't help me then and it inflames me now when I hear people say something similar. It almost feel patronizing. Just because I wasn't as poor as 3rd world children didn't make my plight any easier to handle.
@WashingMyHair: Well it doesn't make it easier, of course. But think of it like this, the way many commenters feel about these "rich kids" is how many people in developing nations feel about the poor and middle class people in the US.
Other people having it worse than you doesn't mean you can't be upset (trust, nothing annoys me more than the middle class morons telling me I have "first world problems"), but I guess my privilege is showing because I can't comprehend people being upset with their socioeconomic class. It is what it is, and most likely, it's not changing. The problem isn't gaps in "class", the problems lie in lack in opportunity. We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot.
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: Some internships are paid. I worked an (unpaid) part time internship while I had a part time job. It sucks but it doesn't kill you.
You can say the same thing about college that you're saying about internships...
@femme-bot: Unpaid work is just the exploitation of educated young people -- some whose parents foot the bills and some who work 2nd and 3rd jobs to be able to subsidize their employers. It's wrong for work to be free when the institutions are large and profitable.
@femme-bot: "We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot." And why useless spending on useless wars needs to be stopped. I think about a month in Iraq could pay for healthcare for the whole country for a year
It's nice that these richies have a social conscience and try to do some good in the world. If we didn't have rich people who absorbed the idea that wealth comes with the responsibility to give something back to society, then we'd all be worse off.
But at the same time, I read stories like this and think, "First World problems, people! These are First World problems! Not having safe drinking water, dodging bullets, slow starvation...those are actual problems. Some perspective, please!"
And then I feel bad for disliking people with money, because after all, they ARE trying. Agh, I hate it when I can't just hate people for simple-minded reasons.
We live in this era where we all present ourselves as a product. It's the difference between somebody saying "I am" and "I am the kind of person who".
If you want to work for a non-profit, that's amazing. Own it. Say, "I am working for a non-profit". Say, "I am rich because of my family". Say, "I am guilty sometimes for having money".
I know too many people - rich and not - who are laboring under the misapprehension that people care about the mysterious underpinnings of their psyche or are interested in the mundane details of their likes and dislikes. These people package themselves with grand pronouncements: "I am the kind of person who refuses to take money from my parents", or "I am the kind of person who believes eating in restaurants is bourgeois", or "I am the kind of person who only drinks fair trade black coffee/ shops at goodwill/ makes great art/ feels incredibly empty".
Nobody gives a shit what kind of rich person you are. Just be a human. You are not inherently more interesting or complicated than anyone else. Get some life experience and learn that self-awareness, self-deprecation, and empathy is not equivalent to fetishizing the "poor" or living like common people do or indulging in righteous self-loathing or telling me what a special snowflake you are.
Or, in the words of my husband, "Blah fucking blah, you privileged twat. Nobody fucking cares."
@funzette: I liked your post! I love that you sorted the difference between those who say "I am" and those who say "I am the type who..." People should quit thinking so hard about the type of person they want to come across as (because, let's face it, we are all too aware and care too much about what others say of us) and just BE that person.
The last part of your comment reminded me of a Jon Stewart line. He was referring to people who lie, cheat and steal but I think it has relevance here: "Be a f*cking human!"
@willwriteforfood: People who say "I am the type of the person who" are usually the exact opposite of that type of person. I think I stole that from a line in Chelsea Handler's last book. Actually, I'm sure I did. Regardless, I second this second hand sentiment.
And then there's this: "In Vermont [this year], I broke my finger and didn't have insurance," said Treibitz, whose father is chief executive of a Colorado company that designs visual presentations for court trials. "I got my X-ray and gave [the hospital] a fake name and walked out. Is that okay that I am doing that -- taking up resources because I am refusing to take money from my parents?"
No, it's not okay, you twit. It's not okay for non-rich people to do it; it's certainly not okay for you to do it. Suck it up and ask for help. Non-rich people do not want company. We want you to consider that to the rest of us, our nonprofit jobs aren't just philanthropic icing on a secure future; they are our jobs, which pay for our homes and families, and when you steal from nonprofits, you steal from all of us who need to work there. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.
Separate issue: I wish just one of these people had talked about using their power and/or their wealth to create or save jobs in this country. While they're playing at work, people are losing their homes and running out of unemployment insurance. Yes, charities need help. But more people need livelihoods than people who need the services of charities. And a lot of people who are now rich got that way by outsourcing jobs that Americans needed to live on. If they want to feel guilty, they can start right there.
@clevernamehere: I was really surprised the editors didn't mention it in the post. That's not just obnoxious; that's criminal behavior. The idea that anyone would think they could justify doing it for some principle of self-reliance, when they do in fact have access to the resources to pay for the services, is incredible.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: You know, or he could do what the rest of us without health insurance do: set up a payment plan with the hospital (smart) or put in on a credit card (not so smart).
@frenchic: I know, either way would at least have been honest! Is that what wealth teaches you--that if you are poor, you've a right to be dishonest? Because if there's one thing I've learned from poverty, it's that few things are despised more than thievery when there isn't enough to go around.
I'm going to go ahead and admit that I feel the resentment.
My husband is from an upper middle class family and my family is very poor. He has worked really hard to become successful in his career, but I can't help but resent the opportunities that he has been given his whole life. What really gets to me is that he doesn't see how much of an advantage someone from his background has. He doesn't see that's it not based solely on hard work.
I realize now that we're married it's "our" success. But it still sucks to be the one in the relationship with the crappy job who had to choose between not finishing college or being homeless at the time.
@Tippi Hedren: I married someone from a much better background myself--they have industrial wealth. My husband's not so bad; he's seen me with my student loans and our struggle to get by with his underpaying job, and he gets it. It's his mother who's a real trial to me. They're unfailingly generous to us, but don't understand how we can feel that they use their money to control us, to keep us from making our own decisions about some fairly big things. And MIL, who has never worked to support herself, never paid for college, never wanted for anything, has the nerve to tell me she understands poverty because they live within their considerable means. One of these days, it's going to burst out of my mouth that when your car dies and you can buy another new one for cash without blinking, you know nothing whatsoever of poverty.
@Tippi Hedren: I had the same college experience, and it still bothers me how few people can understand the implications of working during college for food and shelter, compared to working for pizza money.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: Sounds like my BF's family. Mine is far from wealthy (directions to my parents house involve the words "pass the big trailer park, and then take a left at the little trailer park"), and his is pretty well off. He, however, rebelled and basically turned his back on them and went out on his own. His siblings, though, are another story. And they'll tell you that all is fine and well until they get drunk and start to talk about how it sucks, they don't want to have to be going for an MBA, that they'd rather move to the mountains and be a snowboarding, pot smoking, hippie. It's hard to not be resentful of their fancy new cars and shiny degrees, but then I think of those conversations and it helps. (Not that I want to move to the mountains and be a snowboarding, pot smoking hippie, but I don't have to worry about getting cut off from the family funds if I do.)
@Dizzy8: Yes, excellent example. He complains about having had to eat mac and cheese. Umm... if you actually got to eat, I wouldn't be complaining too hard.
@Tippi Hedren: I totally feel you on this. I made a career transition last year and started working at a nonprofit, and while the work is great and I enjoy it, I don't know how much longer I can last in this field, mainly because of the insensitivities of a lot of my co-workers. In New York in particular, which is an insanely expensive city, being able to live on a nonprofit/media salary is an immense privilege that very few can afford, and they simply don't recognize that. I know that with my enormous undergraduate loans it's exceedingly difficult, but I've sacrificed certain things because it's a choice. My coworkers are my age group and all moved here and similarly went to 'good' colleges and spend their time kvetching about 'sell-outs' and 'bankers' and how much they hate people who take on 'boring' jobs after college that don't contribute to social good the way they do and are generally really sanctimonious. As a scholarship student who lives at home to save money, I resent this. I resent the fact that they can all blissfully work on a $30k salary and have apartments in areas where I know rent is well over a grand a month. Many of my friends from college and high school are the very 'sellouts' they like to make fun of for working in more profitable fields - because it's one of the few things that college grads can do that can afford you independence in an expensive city.
@Tippi Hedren: My husband comes from a wealthy background too and, while I don't resent his opportunities, I resent how blind his parents and brother are to how their family wealth has protected them. All except my husband are convinced that their financial security is all due to their hard work. But inheriting a family business in middle age after spending years dicking around selling Amway and whatever is NOT hard work. My in-laws were very lucky.
My brother-in-law wasted his twenties, then woke up, his parents bailed him out, and now he's doing well. He doesn't think people living in poverty should get any kind of government help because he thinks they were all like he was-- just irresponsible people who should have worked harder. He totally misses that he didn't work his way to where he is now-- he got BAILED OUT and then found a decent job because his parents paid his way through school. Someone without a wealthy family like his would have been screwed for life. They would never have had the luxury to waste their 20's partying in the first place.
I am extremely aware of the privilege my little family has now. It is a huge relief to know that I'll never have to worry about being out on the street. So even though we're trying to do things on our own right now-- my husband and I are both college students plus he works and we have two little kids-- we know we're way better off than most people in our current income bracket. We don't live with the fear that one major disaster would ruin us. I grew up with that hanging over my head-- with a dad who had health problems which meant my parents were never able to get ahead-- that fear that one more job loss, one more lengthy hospitalization, and we may lose everything. If you haven't been there you can never understand what an immense privilege it is to know you have a place to fall. I do resent people who don't understand that.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: Your comment that your parents-in-law somehow use their generosity to control you resonated with me very much. My family is by no means uber-rich, but my grandparents saved every dime they had to ensure that they wouldn't be a burden to anyone in their old age, then didn't live as long as we expected (forever), both of my parents inherited a couple hundred grand each and my dad subsequently invested that and savings from their modest incomes very well. Because of 2 generations of impressive money management skills, all my college expenses were covered...and when I spent all my money, they gave me more. When I accumulated a huge amount of credit card debt, they bailed me out. Rinse, repeat. I never suffered any consequences from my mistakes and so continued to make them. As I got older, I realized that they did this out of a combination of generosity, guilt (childhood sucked, so whatever we can do to make up for that we will) but it also served as a means to keep me close, my continued financial dependence prevented me from growing away and into an adult accountable for my poor choices.
That being said, it isn't that I didn't KNOW how to manage money; I had seen it modeled for me all my life. I was just never required to do it myself, and so when I was out on my own, Grandpa's "never spend money you don't have" mantra seemed to slip my mind.
Additionally, my grandpa and dad were/are notoriously frugal--my dad will exercise the right to a senior citizen discount on a 89 cent soda at McDonald's-- and because this behavior embarrassed me immensely, not to mention having an overall desire to be nothing like my father, I really threw the baby out with the bathwater, failing to discern between behaviors I should model (money management) and those I shouldn't (pretty much everything else).
I am in no way in the same position that these kids are (my mom has told me "Don't even think about an inheritance. I'm spending every dime") but I do think that it is admirable-if misguided--to try to overcome the extravagant lifestyle these kids grew up with. It's hard to break life long habits and change deeply instilled ideas about the way that the world works. Good for anyone trying to overcome that.
Sorry this is so long: as Mark Twain (or TS Eliot or Proust or Ben Franklin and probably a million other people) said, "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." I haven't quite mastered that. :-)
@ambiguousasian: I'm torn on this, because I am about to graduate from a prestigious college and I do bitch about my classmates who unthinkingly go into investment banking and consulting. But the thing is, the kids who "sell out" (at least here) rarely do it because they NEED money. They're generally not from poor backgrounds. They just want a lot of it. I'm certainly not going to have family money after college, and if I'm lucky enough to get a job that pays $30k, I will live on that, somehow, even if it's in NY. And so yeah, I sort of resent my classmates who clearly value taking jobs that will get them a lot of money, while contributing very little to society, because all they care about is parlaying their education into a luxurious lifestyle. That doesn't mean we all need to work for nonprofits--I very well might not, and I have plenty of friends who plan to be doctors, or lawyers, or involved in business. But there are plenty of ways to make enough money to live in New York without going into extremely lucrative fields; investment bankers aren't the only ones surviving comfortably there. If people make the choice to take jobs they aren't very interested in and that don't contribute much to society JUST to make obscene amounts of money, I'd say that's the definition of a sell-out.
@leslieannelevine: then perhaps our experiences are different...mainly because i am a minority scholarship student and wound up hanging out with that crowd in college where most of my friends were people who had substantial loans and no parental money to fall back on. i know that it's definitely not the case for many, but that has just been my experience. and while i would have no problem living on $30k under normal circumstances, my loans amount to around $350 a month. Low 30's earned on new york taxes (city, state, an federal) translate to approximately to around $1200-1500 a month. with most room sublets costing $700-800, and a metrocard costing $100 a month, you see how it becomes and extremely tight fit for a new graduate with loans, with barely any hope for saving up money for graduate school. very few people actually stay in investment banking after two years, and do it partly in order to finance graduate school, whether it be law school or any oher number of fields. so i'm not really arguing for anything other than that taking a lucrative career path is, while unnecessary and greedy for many) is an understandable path for some as well, particularly minorities and those coming from underprivileged backgrounds.
@BearDownCBears: As a mini (and hopefully not so annoying) version of the people in the article...please do tax me, my parents, and my grandparents!
There's actually an organization called Wealth for the Common Good that I'm trying to get my grandparents to join that recruits wealthy individuals to fight for progressive tax reform and speak publicly about how they should be made to pay more. I think they have might ties to Resource Generation (which I find to be annoying and not really understand the complexities of privilege) but I also think the organization has an angle we never hear.
It seems like looking at marriage practices from times past is always strange (this book is a little more than strange...).
Love is love, sex is sex, money is money. But marriage has represented all these things and more. At times the ideal has been to marry for love, or to marry to move up in life, to make an advantageous power-play for the sake of your family. To keep the family name going within itself. Now it seems the ideal is to marry for love, but also to seek all fulfillment from the person you marry - you're supposed to find your "soul mate." It's funny, isn't it, that it's just another arrangement that we've told ourselves is the one right choice, when we've had several "right choices" throughout history and across cultures?
I'm not advocating for a return to marriage where women were treated like property, but I do think it's interesting to see how much the expectations of marriage have changed across time. In some ways, it seems like there would be less pressure if we weren't encouraged to find "THE ONE" and live "HAPPILY EVER AFTER" only to have our dreams shattered when we find our expectations were set too high. #whenyoumarry
The notion wives should be a 'useless ornament' actually dates back to the Victorian Era. It was considered a status symbol to have a wife that had no skills and did no work. Servants cooked and cleaned and raised the children, while the husband 'brought home the bacon'. The Victorian wife was just expected to be lovely and embroider and draw and condescend to the poor....and have no marketable job skills or earn a wage. Before that women were in all the trades and did just about every job there was but heavy plowing. (Even though I have heard and have seen women being used as a mule to pull a plow so they did that job too.) Before the Victorian Era, with exception to the titled, most women were expected to be able to farm or garden, preserve food and seed, cook, clean, raise animals for meat and cloth (along with butchering them), spin wool into yarn, weave it, sew it into clothes and bedding, chop fire wood, keep the fire going, raise and educate the children, and help out their husband in whatever trade they made their living at.
The 50's housewife 'tradition' is just a re-tread of that rather Victorian ideal. #whenyoumarry
@Vulcan Has No Moon: Yes, thank you. And in fact in the pre-depression era there was a mini-cultural revolution of its own sorts. After all that was the era woman cut their hair, decided wearing twenty undergarments stunk and often worked outside of the home in a variety of jobs. I've seen quite a few interesting pre-code films that actually dealt with the idea of the bored rich housewife that didn't like being an ornament and plenty of literature of the day followed suit.
It was more "what work was good for each gender" that ruled the day as opposed to "women shouldn't work."
It was really the generation after WW2 that decided it needed to go back to a "simpler time" that never really existed. #whenyoumarry
That eugenics chart just made me gasp out loud. The scientist in me is laughing uproariously at the idea that skin color is a single gene trait. The human being in me is just plain old horrified. #whenyoumarry
@girlwithoutahero: to clarify, it is horrible. But I keep it on the bookshelf because the title spine alone sets fear in the eyes of boys #whenyoumarry
OK, deep breath because I am going to admit something I have only admitted to one other person.
I've been married to my husband for 10+ years and sometimes the thought of sex with him really is revolting. Not all the time, just sometimes. Am I a terrible wife? #whenyoumarry
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: I have never been married but my thought is no - you aren't. Sex is such an intimate act (and if I actually think about it, a little on the gross side) that I can see sometimes it just isn't very appealing depending on life circumstances. #whenyoumarry
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: I hope not. I think that long term partners have a way of being over-intimate that can only lead to revulsion. I can't talk to you about your constipation problems, pick up your socks for the 5,000th time, and want to make with the sexy all the time. Nature of the beast. #whenyoumarry
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Nup. You're just a person with feelings. I guess one question I'd ask is, is the thought of sex WITH HIM or the the thought of SEX with him the revolting part? Not that that determines whether you're terrible. Basically, if it worries you, try to talk it over with a therapist and work out why you're feeling that way and what you could do about it. #whenyoumarry
@kiwibelle: There are moments when sex of any kind, with any person, seems revolting. It's not that different from hunger--sometimes eating your favorite food(for example) almost makes you want to puke. #whenyoumarry
@Elaken: Oh thank goodness. Growing up with my father I was constantly bombarded with the male pov. I heard constant complaining from his buddies about frigid wives and lack of sex. So I am very self conscience about it.
I love my husband. We have sex quite often but sometimes the thought of sexual intimacy is actually disgusting. I feel kind of awful about this but the one other person I spoke to it about (also married 10+) said she feels the same way sometimes. It isn't personal. #whenyoumarry
@lavendermint: This is a fantastic point. It's been so long since I've been single that I unthinkingly assumed that all single people want sex all the time. #whenyoumarry
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: No. I've been married four months (together 6+) and I occasionally feel the same way. Sex drive is so hormone and emotionally driven, I don't think it has anything to do with him, or with me. #whenyoumarry
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Married almost seven years. There are times of the month where my attitude is "OK, we can do it, but don't put your face near my face." I think as long as you don't feel like that all of the time, you're fine.
It's easy to forget that for women, sex drive really is cyclical, whereas men's is fairly constant. For some reason, we tend to just assume that women have a low sex drive and then we read all of those awful magazine articles about how to "fix" it. Yuck. #whenyoumarry
11/21/09
So, at what point can we round up these guild-ridden rich people, send them on an island, and let poor people hunt them for prize money? Your quarry comes with its inheritance, trust fund, and stock options. Plus any edible portions of the kill.
11/21/09
you'll see their eyes are just like yours.
Hold their hand,
it will feel like yours.
Listen to their heart, it beats like yours.
...
I wish people could talk about their problems, their pains, their depressions without the judgement of those listening. It defeats the point of listening...
We all get sad, lonely, depressed. The rich, the poor, the healthy, the sick, the beautiful, the not-so-much. Is is too much to have a touch of empathy? (Anyone see Funny Face? Anyone?)
- this might also be an extension of my mother's comment after I told her about Dahl Kim's death... "Was she too rich and beautiful?"
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
#tips
11/21/09
i don't know, i was probably too sensitive. full disclosure: i'm a rich kid with a suicidal dad. i can't imagine going, well dad's in the hospital again...but hey, at least we have the beach houses! money really doesn't make a difference in that type of scenario.
#tips
11/21/09
I didn't mean, "well dad's in the hospital again...but hey, at least we have the beach houses!"
But wealth provides a level of cushion and security that people without it don't have
For many people, dad going to the hospital would mean that dad loses his job, they lose their place to live and they wind up on the streets
"well dad's in the hospital again...but thank god that him missing work doesn't mean he will lose his job and we won't have a place to live" is a bad place to be but money provides a backstop that keeps it from being an economic disaster as well as emotionally painful
#tips
11/21/09
On a purely practical level borrowing money for cabs to the hospital, begging at the bank and relying on handouts is not fun. I've been there. My 2 cents: some financial security will make the practicalities a wee bit easier and that's about it.
Good luck joutfit!
11/21/09
@SuzyBee: Thank you for saying what I meant better than I said it. My father died of cancer when I was in hs and it changed *****everything***** from being ok and having enough to total chaos. Money would have helped a lot.
#tips
11/21/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
It's especially funny that some commenters are getting annoyed that these guys are taking jobs. If this post was about rich kids who do nothing, I bet people would be bitching that they should get jobs.
Is anyone posting here really "poor" especially when compared with the rest of the world? Everyone here has it better than someone, globally, they have it better than most.
Really read some of the comments, they're (unintentionally?) hilarious.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Wait... so you mean you don't think you're the WORST for taking an internship!? Heh. I mean, what's the solution there? Do people think that if "rich kids" stop taking unpaid internships, suddenly they'd be able to afford to?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Other people having it worse than you doesn't mean you can't be upset (trust, nothing annoys me more than the middle class morons telling me I have "first world problems"), but I guess my privilege is showing because I can't comprehend people being upset with their socioeconomic class. It is what it is, and most likely, it's not changing. The problem isn't gaps in "class", the problems lie in lack in opportunity. We need better schools, better heath care, etc etc etc. Which is why taxes need to be raised. A lot.
11/20/09
11/20/09
You can say the same thing about college that you're saying about internships...
11/21/09
#tips
11/21/09
#tips
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/20/09
But at the same time, I read stories like this and think, "First World problems, people! These are First World problems! Not having safe drinking water, dodging bullets, slow starvation...those are actual problems. Some perspective, please!"
And then I feel bad for disliking people with money, because after all, they ARE trying. Agh, I hate it when I can't just hate people for simple-minded reasons.
11/20/09
We live in this era where we all present ourselves as a product. It's the difference between somebody saying "I am" and "I am the kind of person who".
If you want to work for a non-profit, that's amazing. Own it. Say, "I am working for a non-profit". Say, "I am rich because of my family". Say, "I am guilty sometimes for having money".
I know too many people - rich and not - who are laboring under the misapprehension that people care about the mysterious underpinnings of their psyche or are interested in the mundane details of their likes and dislikes. These people package themselves with grand pronouncements: "I am the kind of person who refuses to take money from my parents", or "I am the kind of person who believes eating in restaurants is bourgeois", or "I am the kind of person who only drinks fair trade black coffee/ shops at goodwill/ makes great art/ feels incredibly empty".
Nobody gives a shit what kind of rich person you are. Just be a human. You are not inherently more interesting or complicated than anyone else. Get some life experience and learn that self-awareness, self-deprecation, and empathy is not equivalent to fetishizing the "poor" or living like common people do or indulging in righteous self-loathing or telling me what a special snowflake you are.
Or, in the words of my husband, "Blah fucking blah, you privileged twat. Nobody fucking cares."
/FIN.
11/20/09
The last part of your comment reminded me of a Jon Stewart line. He was referring to people who lie, cheat and steal but I think it has relevance here: "Be a f*cking human!"
11/20/09
11/20/09
No, it's not okay, you twit. It's not okay for non-rich people to do it; it's certainly not okay for you to do it. Suck it up and ask for help. Non-rich people do not want company. We want you to consider that to the rest of us, our nonprofit jobs aren't just philanthropic icing on a secure future; they are our jobs, which pay for our homes and families, and when you steal from nonprofits, you steal from all of us who need to work there. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.
Separate issue: I wish just one of these people had talked about using their power and/or their wealth to create or save jobs in this country. While they're playing at work, people are losing their homes and running out of unemployment insurance. Yes, charities need help. But more people need livelihoods than people who need the services of charities. And a lot of people who are now rich got that way by outsourcing jobs that Americans needed to live on. If they want to feel guilty, they can start right there.
11/20/09
Money is a finate resource. The money that hospital spent on his xray could have been used for someone who really needed it.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
My husband is from an upper middle class family and my family is very poor. He has worked really hard to become successful in his career, but I can't help but resent the opportunities that he has been given his whole life. What really gets to me is that he doesn't see how much of an advantage someone from his background has. He doesn't see that's it not based solely on hard work.
I realize now that we're married it's "our" success. But it still sucks to be the one in the relationship with the crappy job who had to choose between not finishing college or being homeless at the time.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
My brother-in-law wasted his twenties, then woke up, his parents bailed him out, and now he's doing well. He doesn't think people living in poverty should get any kind of government help because he thinks they were all like he was-- just irresponsible people who should have worked harder. He totally misses that he didn't work his way to where he is now-- he got BAILED OUT and then found a decent job because his parents paid his way through school. Someone without a wealthy family like his would have been screwed for life. They would never have had the luxury to waste their 20's partying in the first place.
I am extremely aware of the privilege my little family has now. It is a huge relief to know that I'll never have to worry about being out on the street. So even though we're trying to do things on our own right now-- my husband and I are both college students plus he works and we have two little kids-- we know we're way better off than most people in our current income bracket. We don't live with the fear that one major disaster would ruin us. I grew up with that hanging over my head-- with a dad who had health problems which meant my parents were never able to get ahead-- that fear that one more job loss, one more lengthy hospitalization, and we may lose everything. If you haven't been there you can never understand what an immense privilege it is to know you have a place to fall. I do resent people who don't understand that.
11/20/09
11/20/09
That being said, it isn't that I didn't KNOW how to manage money; I had seen it modeled for me all my life. I was just never required to do it myself, and so when I was out on my own, Grandpa's "never spend money you don't have" mantra seemed to slip my mind.
Additionally, my grandpa and dad were/are notoriously frugal--my dad will exercise the right to a senior citizen discount on a 89 cent soda at McDonald's-- and because this behavior embarrassed me immensely, not to mention having an overall desire to be nothing like my father, I really threw the baby out with the bathwater, failing to discern between behaviors I should model (money management) and those I shouldn't (pretty much everything else).
I am in no way in the same position that these kids are (my mom has told me "Don't even think about an inheritance. I'm spending every dime") but I do think that it is admirable-if misguided--to try to overcome the extravagant lifestyle these kids grew up with. It's hard to break life long habits and change deeply instilled ideas about the way that the world works. Good for anyone trying to overcome that.
Sorry this is so long: as Mark Twain (or TS Eliot or Proust or Ben Franklin and probably a million other people) said, "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." I haven't quite mastered that. :-)
11/20/09
11/21/09
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
There's actually an organization called Wealth for the Common Good that I'm trying to get my grandparents to join that recruits wealthy individuals to fight for progressive tax reform and speak publicly about how they should be made to pay more. I think they have might ties to Resource Generation (which I find to be annoying and not really understand the complexities of privilege) but I also think the organization has an angle we never hear.
11/20/09
And if all private property is nationalized, what about the LIVERY OF SIESIN?
#tips
10/22/09
Love is love, sex is sex, money is money. But marriage has represented all these things and more. At times the ideal has been to marry for love, or to marry to move up in life, to make an advantageous power-play for the sake of your family. To keep the family name going within itself. Now it seems the ideal is to marry for love, but also to seek all fulfillment from the person you marry - you're supposed to find your "soul mate." It's funny, isn't it, that it's just another arrangement that we've told ourselves is the one right choice, when we've had several "right choices" throughout history and across cultures?
I'm not advocating for a return to marriage where women were treated like property, but I do think it's interesting to see how much the expectations of marriage have changed across time. In some ways, it seems like there would be less pressure if we weren't encouraged to find "THE ONE" and live "HAPPILY EVER AFTER" only to have our dreams shattered when we find our expectations were set too high. #whenyoumarry
10/21/09
The 50's housewife 'tradition' is just a re-tread of that rather Victorian ideal. #whenyoumarry
10/22/09
It was more "what work was good for each gender" that ruled the day as opposed to "women shouldn't work."
It was really the generation after WW2 that decided it needed to go back to a "simpler time" that never really existed. #whenyoumarry
10/22/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
I've been married to my husband for 10+ years and sometimes the thought of sex with him really is revolting. Not all the time, just sometimes. Am I a terrible wife? #whenyoumarry
10/21/09
Just to clarify I mean about a week before the event and the week after I totally am NOT in the mood.
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
I love my husband. We have sex quite often but sometimes the thought of sexual intimacy is actually disgusting. I feel kind of awful about this but the one other person I spoke to it about (also married 10+) said she feels the same way sometimes. It isn't personal. #whenyoumarry
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
It's easy to forget that for women, sex drive really is cyclical, whereas men's is fairly constant. For some reason, we tend to just assume that women have a low sex drive and then we read all of those awful magazine articles about how to "fix" it. Yuck. #whenyoumarry