<![CDATA[Jezebel: good housekeeping]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: good housekeeping]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/goodhousekeeping http://jezebel.com/tag/goodhousekeeping <![CDATA[Seals Of Approval]]> The Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval, which the Hearst-owned mag has awarded to quality products since 1909, is getting an overhaul. I

t's not its first: the seal has had seven redesigns in its life, and for a few years now has sported a loud red and blue 90's costume. Says graphic designer Louise Fili,'"The last one, that said everything about the ’90s. Nineties branding was the client breathing down your neck and saying, ‘Can you get the type bigger?’ You get the type bigger by having it burst out of the oval."' The new design, which the mag's editor describes as "a difficult design project, but a very juicy one” is clean and slightly retro - a more authoritative seal of approval for uncertain times. [NYT]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5122449&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The New York Observer's "Off the Record"...]]> The New York Observer's "Off the Record" media column asked some of the editors of the so-called "seven sisters" magazines — which include Family Circle, Ladies Home Journal, Redbook, Good Housekeeping and Woman's Day — whether or not they would endorse Hillary Clinton, since they have always had a cozy relationship with First Ladies. The answer from every editor was a resounding NO. Woman's Day EIC Jane Chesnutt told the Observer's John Koblin, "We go to press with our November issue before the conventions are even held. So to endorse anyone is, you see — even if you assume the candidate is set — a physical impossibility." Chesnutt then added, "I have to say that I don't sense this monolithic support for her among women." [Observer]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351059&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Study Says Magazines For Black Women More Likely To Shill Fad Diets]]> The way "black" magazines and "mainstream" mags discuss diet strategies is very different, according a recent study done at the University of Iowa. According to a U of Iowa press release: "African-American women's magazines are more likely to encourage fad diets and reliance on faith to lose weight, while mainstream women's magazines focus more on evidence-based diet strategies." "Fad diets" include Atkins and South Beach, as well as any diet that "may work in the short term," but doesn't ultimately result in longterm, lasting lifestyle changes. The authors of the study based their findings off 406 articles published between 1984 and 2004 in Ebony, Jet, Essence, Good Housekeeping, Better Homes and Gardens, and Ladies' Home Journal. The problem with almost all the weight loss strategies employed by both African American and mainstream publications, explains researcher Shelly Campo, is that they rely too much on individual accountability, and do not consider the external factors.



According to Campos, "We blame individuals too much for circumstances that are not entirely within their control. We know people living in unsafe neighborhoods are much less likely to exercise. And fast food is cheap compared to fresh fruit and vegetables. To tell a poor person that they made a bad choice because they couldn't afford the salad fixings raises some ethical concerns."

The researchers also found that the ads in Ebony, Jet, and Essence were "primarily for foods high in calories but low in nutritional value." The study's authors put an emphasis on communities creating recreational opportunities and making farmers market goods available to those living in poorer neighborhoods. "The study clearly points to a need for public-health advocates and advocates of the African-American community to push their media to increase coverage of overweight and obesity health issues," according to Campos. Considering three quarters of African American women are considered overweight or obese, is it the job of the government, the community, or the magazine industry to help fix the problem?

Study: Weight-loss Tips Differ In African-American, Mainstream Magazines [University of Iowa]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345006&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Onwards and upwards.]]> ellenl.jpg

Congratulations to Ellen Levine, editor in chief of Good Housekeeping, who's moving up in the world of Hearst Magazines.

I marked her down for greatness after reading her GH editor's letter this month, where she confided that among the five things she had just learned from this issue is that baby sitters can be dangerous and you can buy things cheap on the internet.

With such cutting edge savvy, the girl was bound to go far.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=176558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Honey, I killed the kids.]]> GH.jpg

From a happy little Q&A on child-abusing baby sitters in Good Housekeeping:

Q: Is it riskier to hire a male babysitter?
A: Yes, as far as sexual abuse is concerned. Seventy-seven percent of reported sexual assaults by babysitters are committed by males.

Q: Does that mean it's safer to hire a girl?
A: Not necessarily. Females commit 64 percent of the reported physical assults - hitting, slapping - against kids by babysitters.

Hmmm. Do they still have wolves that suckle human babies?

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175761&view=rss&microfeed=true