I believe in equal opportunities when it comes to shaming. However neither's behaviour particulat bothers me. As long as it is conducted OUTSIDE the workplace why should it be an issue? If such behaviour was used within the workplace to secure pecuniary gain or promotion at the expense of others then I would be angry. However I have dated enough extremely wealthy men to know that I cannot fake interest if I find them genuinely boring or boorish. So I have a grudging admiration for those who can.
Silly question, but when was DABA revealed to be a hoax? I heard that there were some suspicious stuff on the website that suggested it was a hoax, but I didn't realize that it was officially debunked.
Not that it really matters, but I'm a little concerned that I seem to be missing big chunks out of my Jezzie memory...
Then too, these women are presented, uniformly, as horror stories: a disgusting Other being forced to reap what they sowed while the rest of us sit back in pious judgment.
Yes, exactly. I think we're missing the real enemy here. Profiles that consistenly characterize women who seek to marry men of high net worth and status in order to find some measure of security for themselves and their children as "golddiggers" and whores are dividing women and pitting us against one another.
Of course when you put it that way there's going to be backlash. These writers are implying - sometimes overtly stating - that these women are morally bankrupt, lazy, vaccuous and intentionally out to take advantage of someone.
Sure, there are those who are, and it's right to shame them for those qualities. But this reeks to me of the patriarchy seeking once again using negative judgments and sterotypes to belittle women who are simply trying to serve their own best interests. And they're getting some of us to help them do it.
I'm still a bit confused by the concept of girl-on-girl crime. Is it because women are held to a higher standard than men? Because me judging someone for doing something despicable/lame doesn't necessarily mean it's girl-on-girl crime just because we happen to be the same gender. I understand you're not saying that women criticizing other women ALWAYS constitutes girl-on-girl crime, Sadie, but where do you draw the line?
@citrus_buddha: For me it's attacking women for deviating from the role assigned to them by the patriarchy. So if you attack a woman for being heavy, or tall, or aging, or not conventionally attractive, or enjoying sex, etc., I consider it girl-on-girl. Also any use of gendered insults (bitch, cunt, twat, etc.) is off-limits to me.
Attacking people for character deficits (greed, rudeness, etc) is open game.
For me the more nuanced area is when women are conforming to the patriarchy, and upholding the stereotypes that society tells them they should. Because I see this as a societal problem, I'm less likely to attack a woman for it than the P, unless she's promoting it as part of a lifestyle (patriarchy-supporting). Here I'm talking about a wide range of choices, from dyed hair to painfully high heels to boob jobs to stripping to prostitution to FGM.
@citrus_buddha: I take girl-on-girl crime to be justified in terms of not holding each other to the screwed up sexist standards of the society in which we find each other. As in, I think the women who work for PETA and female sexist journalists (a la Bettina Arndt) are fair game, but I won't criticize women for their physical appearance or sexuality. (It makes me really angry when people call Ann Coulter a man.)
@citrus_buddha: Oh, and I would give my next paycheck if there was never another comment mocking a woman's body for it's femaleness. Like the "it's not a clowncar / like a pencil in a mineshaft / her boobz must hang down to the ground now LOLOLOLOLOMGLOLOL" comments in the Duggar* threads.
*I am the world's biggest anti-Duggarite, but holy shiz those comments make me want to inflict bodily harm on someone.
@yvanehtnioj: Interesting. I totally get what you're saying about not criticizing women for deviating from sexist societal norms. But yes, I guess I frequently become confused when women are CHOOSING to conform to these norms. Should you criticize them, or should you criticize the society they grew up in them that caused them to internalize sexist ideas?
I'm all about personal responsibility, but I do understand that there's a fine line between attacking someone's choices and blaming the victim.
@Laulau: Yeah, I agree that hating on people like Ann Coulter, is complicated, but I'm all about hating on the actions, not the people.
Like, Ann Coulter--she's like the Grande Dame of upholding the patriarchy (unless it's all an elaborate hoax and she's like, a pinko liberal commie performance artist in a brilliant satire of conservativism). But the patriarchy sucks us all in, and everyone has to make choices and compromise their values. Before class, for example, I put on makeup, even though I firmly believe that makeup, as it exists in American culture today, is a decidedly perpetuating agent of the patriarchy. At least it is the way I and most women wear it. But I make that compromise, which is a "sin" in the eyes of some imaginary anit-patriarchal judging goddess, because it makes my life easier, by making me look professional. Is it fucked that I have to alter my appearance in a way men do not in order to look professional? Yes. By doing so, am I making it harder for other women to choose to NOT wear makeup and still be considered professional? Yes. But I don't feel guilty about it, because if I felt guilty about everything that I did that is bad for the earth, according to my moral standards, I'd never stop feeling guilty. Almost all of my clothes have been constructed in 3rd world countries, in labor conditions that are probably unsatisfactory; I drive a Jeep; I eat meat; etc. I feel comfortable saying something like "wearing makeup is fucked up" but not "people who wear makeup are fucked up." It's once you start hating on the person that it can become a girl-on-girl crime.
That, and hating on behavior that is what I would call a coping mechanism for living in a world that ultimately hates women. Marriage, for example, is a fucked up institution that excludes gay people (in the US, because even marriages performed in MA don't count when you move to Florida, for example) and has historically been used as a way for men to cement their economic relations with each other by exchanging women. Today, most studies show, marriage significantly alters relationships, so that co-habitating couples who get married begin to regress into antiquated and misogynistic gender roles almost as soon as the honeymoon is over. And so marriage as an institution is fucked up. But it's also way easier to live married than not, so people who get married are trying to do their best in a system that's easier to deal with as married, and I'm not going to judge people who get married*, and I'm still going to go to weddings and have fun and love my friends who get married, all the while thinking weddings and marriages are sexist and creepy. Hating on marriage = ok. Hating women who get married = g-o-g crime.
*Unless they invite me to the wedding and there's no open bar, because that's just fucked up.
@citrus buddha: This is where it can (and does) devolve into "I choose my choice!" Furxample: I chose my boob job! It gave me confidence! etc.
Okay, I get it. It's so personal, it's part of your body, your own experience was so different from mine that I can't judge you on it (having a mom who tells you you're unattractive in that shape, general low self-esteem issues, frakking Barbie dolls since age 5, etc.). So I'm not going to jump off on someone for it. UNLESS it sounds like she is advocating the same for other women (and thus becoming part of THEIR personal hellish experience) or refusing to acknowledge that the P played any role in her decisionmaking.
Furapursonalxample: I wear makeup. I like it, it's fun, I think I've mastered the art of making myself slightly more conventionally attractive. I think it's awesome that there are women who don't, I fully support and respect that decision. I know that we would all be living in a better world where women weren't expected to routinely alter/enhance their personal appearance to conform to a P-approved "norm", and I appreciate that their rejection of this corner of the P makes my life better.
I guess it all boils down to self-awareness for me. You can choose your choice, if you acknowledge what choices you're leaving on the table and what influences your decisionmaking.
@Cimorene: Ok. Thanks guys, this is all becoming clearer to my foggy brain. But CAN you criticize a woman's individual action that feeds into sexist societal norms without criticizing her as a person? What if that person is completely unaware that she, as you say, is compromising her values and feeding into the patriarchy? Then aren't you in effect judging HER and not simply her actions?
I dig what you're saying about everyone having to make compromises, (I too wear make-up, despite how I feel about how lame it is that I feel I have to wear make-up) or else we'd all be wallowing in unbearable guilt 24/7.
I think I just struggle with how you effectively blame the system without blaming the individual, and whether maybe you SHOULD to a certain extent blame the individual for not being able to recognize the sexism that surrounds us. What's most helpful, in the long run?
@Cimorene: Could you just follow me around all day and explain that to people for me? kthxbai.
Seriously, though, that is totally it for me, too, and you make many good points. One that struck me is that we don't have to do everything "perfectly" in order to still have our beliefs and values. We just can't -- we're human and this is the society we're stuck with. I've always thought that about trying to do good things for the environment. People like to ... I don't know ... be a jerk by saying, "Oh, you like the environment and recycle, but you still drive a car!" or something. It's like that. We can only do so much and we do what we can.
@citrus buddha: I think it depends on the sophistication of the individual. If a person is perpetuating the P and has no other real, viable options, you can only blame the P. If the person is a grillionaire who supports the P for extra spending cash and shits'n'giggles (I'm looking at you, Paris), then blame away.
Most of us exist in between, and I think that the time it takes to say, "I blame the system that lead to her choice here, but also wish she had been more thoughtful as to how her actions affect societal expectations and other women's lives" is time well spent.
@yvanehtnioj: "I think that the time it takes to say, "I blame the system that lead to her choice here, but also wish she had been more thoughtful as to how her actions affect societal expectations and other women's lives" is time well spent."
@everyone: Thanks for this discussion. It's threads like this that got me hooked on Jez in the first place, and I'm always re-impressed by the caliber of commenters here when one pops up. xoxo.
I hear many women talking about steps they are taking to take responsibility for themselves, cut back, make conscious decisions to protect themselves in this uncertain climate.
But in that "I am making responsible choices" protectiveness, there's the implication that Other women are irresponsible, unable to keep up with their bills/shopping and wishing they could remain dependent on bankers/daddies.
I think some women are eager to distance themselves from that by laughing at sugardaddy/golddigger tropes.
@ZeusGrumbles: I don't understand how talking about making positive, responsible personal decision implies judgement of others as irresponsible. Of course, sometimes it's explicit but is this often the case?
@Devonna: Rephrase: what if it's one of these women saying, "Well, I made positive, responsible personal decisions to hang out in these bars where bankers are, and diet and exercise and whiten my teeth and get breast implants and devote a lot of time to fashion and in every other way make myself an ideal wife for one of these men, and therefore, a candidate for the lifestyle I want. And if you don't want to do that, you don't get the lifestyle." The "othering" goes both ways and is just as cruel, but no less rational in origin.
What's your point, though? These women don't hesitate to engage in girl-on-girl shaming when other, average women complain of being dateless. They're right there to point at other women's figures, their clothes, their lack of other stereotypically attractive attributes, as reasons that the average woman can't aspire to their lifestyle. They think they're special and above it. Our whole culture is based on that sort of attitude. I refuse to feel all that terribly about women now realizing that there is no way to ensure success with men or in life in general. Okay, so they're destabilized. Welcome to the club. In the end, they'll come out on top again and the rest of us will have to content ourselves with more character and less money. They don't need my pity, and they're not getting it.
@greengrey: I know a lot of women like that, and more of them surprise me every day. Even when in principle, you oppose that kind of thing, it takes very little tweaking before you come up against gender assumptions you didn't know you had, and often it comes out after you're already married, when your first few marital hardships are upon you. This job environment has been affecting a lot of couples that way.
Few people are entirely emancipated from this. Of course, not everyone defines "quality" the same way. I'd rather have my husband at home for dinner than spending the first fifteen years of our marriage making as much money as possible. Other women have different priorities.
@Mkp-hearts-NYC: The world has spent far too long wandering dizzily around, yelling I CHOOSE MY CHOICE and burping into people's faces. Fuck that shit.
@Eeva: The world doesn't have to have a more modest atmosphere or hide its earthquakes with air brushing for the sake of SOME people's prudery! The world is out and craggy and its ozone is full of holes and it doesn't have to answer to you!!
Confession: I don't have a clue what free bottle service is, in fact I had never even heard that phrase until these articles came out. But it sounds, to me, like some sort of creepy, age-regressive role-play; I keep imagining these women curled up on their backs like baby wild cats, suckling at be-nippled bottles of Pinot Grigio, which are held up to their lips by faceless dudes in suits.
@stealthird: ...I'm pretty sure it means they open bottles of wine for you at restaurants. But hey...maybe things have gotten more umm...sophisticated since my last outing at the Ritz.
the rags to riches tale is as old as cinderella, folks. y'know, cinderella - a fairy tale. a fairy tale that little girls have been devouring since the printed word...or something, like that.
i wish that escapism didn't automatically mean going into outdated-until-we-know-somebody-who-actu...21st-century misogynistic gender roles each and every. single. TIME.
I kind of hate WaPo already, but seriously? They make it sound like we're all following 50s dating rules. I always offer (and sometimes insist) to pay my half, even on a first date. I'm not looking for a freaking meal ticket, and not only because that can be an unpleasant/dangerous deal.
@greengrey: Thank you. A lot of people think I'm being an "angry feminist" (which, maybe), but I'd rather just buy my own drinks and not have any expectations, whether or not I think I owe him anything.
Maybe it isn't seeing supposedly vapid women get their comeuppance, so much as being miffed that these stereotypes are being perpetuated and we all pay. And, yes, I agree that we are complicit.
@fireflyinjuly: Yes--these are streotypes. Frankly, the media chooses to focus on tiny percentages of the female population who engage in the most extreme gold-digger behavior (The DABAs, an NYT article about wealthy businessmen's mistresss in Beijing and Tokyo,etc.)and it's poor journalism, plain and simple.
Whoever wrote that DABA article should have gotten a serious dressing-down from his/her editor.
Women are held to higher standards. You even see it on Jezebel- when a woman does something truly atrocious, there are often a few commentators who are surprised it was a woman and not a man.
Society doesn't expect much of men and hasn't for awhile. Pick-up artists aren't really that different from DABA girls, they are both using the opposite sex for their gratification. But an article about pick-up artists will get a lot of comments from guys saying how inspired they now are because society tells them they can be selfish animals and no one will judge them too harshly. Women who were envious of the DABA girls (and I'm sure they exist) knew they had to hide their user tendencies.
When women attack women like the DABA girls, they're defending themselves. Men don't generally feel the same need to say "I'm not a user" because if they are users, it is kind of okay.
@Lyesmith: Yes. Although I like to think I judge evenly. Like, the men in these shallow relationships? Also gross, probably. Actually, can someone send them our way to be judged and ridiculed? I'd like that. Thnx.
@rocknrollunicorn: Yes. I think Lyesmith's point is dead-on, but I think that for the most part, we as a group would certainly judge the guys in these relationships harshly. The problem is, no one's writing the article about the guys in the first place.
@rocknrollunicorn: Yeah, but there's a difference between solidarity and deliberately targeting women for something that is imlpicitly gendered (like "gold digging").
Also, actually, I totally believe in female solidarity. Does that mean I have to like and be totally besties with all women? No, but it means that I'm not going to blame women for their choices. Blame the choices: yes. Blame the woman: no.
@Cimorene: I just think that, at some point, we need to hold people accountable and say, "that is NOT the right way to behave." I know a lot of this is the patriarchy and who the media focuses on. But I'm not giving up completely on a bit of personal responsibility.
@Tmoney02: No. This being a patriarchy and all, men's choices are far less dictated by women, whereas women's choices are primarily dictated by men. So, what about the menz? I don't care about the menz.
@Cimorene: Isn't it infantilizing women though to say "oh gee, I can't blame you for your choices or hold you accountable because your just a women who is being held down by the menz and the Patriarchy and thus aren't able to think for yourself or make independent choices."
Does the Patriarchy excuse any accountability/responsibility on the part of women and their choices? Or is absolutely every choice a woman makes not actually a choice but dictated by the Patriarchy?
@Tmoney02: If you don't acknowledge the patriarchal nature of our society (and your comments suggest that you don't), then it will be very hard to have a reasonable discussion about this. Your immediate resort to extremes shows that you don't want to do that anyway.
My evaluation: not worth the effort to bang head against this particular brick wall.
@yvanehtnioj: If you don't acknowledge the patriarchal nature of our society (and your comments suggest that you don't)
Where did i ever suggest that it didn't exist? The whole comment was asking whats the balance between patriarchal society and personal choice/responsibility/accountability etc.
But hey your choice (or was that power of the patriarchy at work? - a little joke for levity considering the whole topic is power of patriarchy over choices) if you would not like to engage in discussion and just curtly dismiss me.
I just hope others are more willing to discuss the dynamics of current society, Especially since I am not the first in this thread to raise this question, though I did expand upon it.
@Tmoney02: The fact that you ignored the person who chose to engage you in reasonable discussion to complain about the fact that I did not only reinforces my conviction that I was right to avoid trying.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Not that it really matters, but I'm a little concerned that I seem to be missing big chunks out of my Jezzie memory...
03/04/09
03/04/09
Yes, exactly. I think we're missing the real enemy here. Profiles that consistenly characterize women who seek to marry men of high net worth and status in order to find some measure of security for themselves and their children as "golddiggers" and whores are dividing women and pitting us against one another.
Of course when you put it that way there's going to be backlash. These writers are implying - sometimes overtly stating - that these women are morally bankrupt, lazy, vaccuous and intentionally out to take advantage of someone.
Sure, there are those who are, and it's right to shame them for those qualities. But this reeks to me of the patriarchy seeking once again using negative judgments and sterotypes to belittle women who are simply trying to serve their own best interests. And they're getting some of us to help them do it.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Attacking people for character deficits (greed, rudeness, etc) is open game.
For me the more nuanced area is when women are conforming to the patriarchy, and upholding the stereotypes that society tells them they should. Because I see this as a societal problem, I'm less likely to attack a woman for it than the P, unless she's promoting it as part of a lifestyle (patriarchy-supporting). Here I'm talking about a wide range of choices, from dyed hair to painfully high heels to boob jobs to stripping to prostitution to FGM.
YMMV.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
*I am the world's biggest anti-Duggarite, but holy shiz those comments make me want to inflict bodily harm on someone.
03/04/09
I'm all about personal responsibility, but I do understand that there's a fine line between attacking someone's choices and blaming the victim.
03/04/09
Like, Ann Coulter--she's like the Grande Dame of upholding the patriarchy (unless it's all an elaborate hoax and she's like, a pinko liberal commie performance artist in a brilliant satire of conservativism). But the patriarchy sucks us all in, and everyone has to make choices and compromise their values. Before class, for example, I put on makeup, even though I firmly believe that makeup, as it exists in American culture today, is a decidedly perpetuating agent of the patriarchy. At least it is the way I and most women wear it. But I make that compromise, which is a "sin" in the eyes of some imaginary anit-patriarchal judging goddess, because it makes my life easier, by making me look professional. Is it fucked that I have to alter my appearance in a way men do not in order to look professional? Yes. By doing so, am I making it harder for other women to choose to NOT wear makeup and still be considered professional? Yes. But I don't feel guilty about it, because if I felt guilty about everything that I did that is bad for the earth, according to my moral standards, I'd never stop feeling guilty. Almost all of my clothes have been constructed in 3rd world countries, in labor conditions that are probably unsatisfactory; I drive a Jeep; I eat meat; etc. I feel comfortable saying something like "wearing makeup is fucked up" but not "people who wear makeup are fucked up." It's once you start hating on the person that it can become a girl-on-girl crime.
That, and hating on behavior that is what I would call a coping mechanism for living in a world that ultimately hates women. Marriage, for example, is a fucked up institution that excludes gay people (in the US, because even marriages performed in MA don't count when you move to Florida, for example) and has historically been used as a way for men to cement their economic relations with each other by exchanging women. Today, most studies show, marriage significantly alters relationships, so that co-habitating couples who get married begin to regress into antiquated and misogynistic gender roles almost as soon as the honeymoon is over. And so marriage as an institution is fucked up. But it's also way easier to live married than not, so people who get married are trying to do their best in a system that's easier to deal with as married, and I'm not going to judge people who get married*, and I'm still going to go to weddings and have fun and love my friends who get married, all the while thinking weddings and marriages are sexist and creepy. Hating on marriage = ok. Hating women who get married = g-o-g crime.
*Unless they invite me to the wedding and there's no open bar, because that's just fucked up.
03/04/09
Okay, I get it. It's so personal, it's part of your body, your own experience was so different from mine that I can't judge you on it (having a mom who tells you you're unattractive in that shape, general low self-esteem issues, frakking Barbie dolls since age 5, etc.). So I'm not going to jump off on someone for it. UNLESS it sounds like she is advocating the same for other women (and thus becoming part of THEIR personal hellish experience) or refusing to acknowledge that the P played any role in her decisionmaking.
Furapursonalxample: I wear makeup. I like it, it's fun, I think I've mastered the art of making myself slightly more conventionally attractive. I think it's awesome that there are women who don't, I fully support and respect that decision. I know that we would all be living in a better world where women weren't expected to routinely alter/enhance their personal appearance to conform to a P-approved "norm", and I appreciate that their rejection of this corner of the P makes my life better.
I guess it all boils down to self-awareness for me. You can choose your choice, if you acknowledge what choices you're leaving on the table and what influences your decisionmaking.
/end novel
03/04/09
03/04/09
I dig what you're saying about everyone having to make compromises, (I too wear make-up, despite how I feel about how lame it is that I feel I have to wear make-up) or else we'd all be wallowing in unbearable guilt 24/7.
I think I just struggle with how you effectively blame the system without blaming the individual, and whether maybe you SHOULD to a certain extent blame the individual for not being able to recognize the sexism that surrounds us. What's most helpful, in the long run?
03/04/09
Seriously, though, that is totally it for me, too, and you make many good points. One that struck me is that we don't have to do everything "perfectly" in order to still have our beliefs and values. We just can't -- we're human and this is the society we're stuck with. I've always thought that about trying to do good things for the environment. People like to ... I don't know ... be a jerk by saying, "Oh, you like the environment and recycle, but you still drive a car!" or something. It's like that. We can only do so much and we do what we can.
03/04/09
Most of us exist in between, and I think that the time it takes to say, "I blame the system that lead to her choice here, but also wish she had been more thoughtful as to how her actions affect societal expectations and other women's lives" is time well spent.
03/04/09
Brilliant. You've articulated this so well.
03/04/09
V. nice.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
But in that "I am making responsible choices" protectiveness, there's the implication that Other women are irresponsible, unable to keep up with their bills/shopping and wishing they could remain dependent on bankers/daddies.
I think some women are eager to distance themselves from that by laughing at sugardaddy/golddigger tropes.
I'd be interested to hear Isla's take.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Few people are entirely emancipated from this. Of course, not everyone defines "quality" the same way. I'd rather have my husband at home for dinner than spending the first fifteen years of our marriage making as much money as possible. Other women have different priorities.
03/04/09
I'm sorry, was that girl-on-world crime?
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Cheaper to get drunk at home, and kinda ruins the point of a bar.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
i wish that escapism didn't automatically mean going into outdated-until-we-know-somebody-who-actu...21st-century misogynistic gender roles each and every. single. TIME.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Whoever wrote that DABA article should have gotten a serious dressing-down from his/her editor.
03/04/09
Society doesn't expect much of men and hasn't for awhile. Pick-up artists aren't really that different from DABA girls, they are both using the opposite sex for their gratification. But an article about pick-up artists will get a lot of comments from guys saying how inspired they now are because society tells them they can be selfish animals and no one will judge them too harshly. Women who were envious of the DABA girls (and I'm sure they exist) knew they had to hide their user tendencies.
When women attack women like the DABA girls, they're defending themselves. Men don't generally feel the same need to say "I'm not a user" because if they are users, it is kind of okay.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Also, actually, I totally believe in female solidarity. Does that mean I have to like and be totally besties with all women? No, but it means that I'm not going to blame women for their choices. Blame the choices: yes. Blame the woman: no.
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
03/04/09
Just curious if that holds true for men in your book as well?
03/04/09
03/04/09
Does the Patriarchy excuse any accountability/responsibility on the part of women and their choices? Or is absolutely every choice a woman makes not actually a choice but dictated by the Patriarchy?
03/04/09
My evaluation: not worth the effort to bang head against this particular brick wall.
03/04/09
Where did i ever suggest that it didn't exist? The whole comment was asking whats the balance between patriarchal society and personal choice/responsibility/accountability etc.
But hey your choice (or was that power of the patriarchy at work? - a little joke for levity considering the whole topic is power of patriarchy over choices) if you would not like to engage in discussion and just curtly dismiss me.
I just hope others are more willing to discuss the dynamics of current society, Especially since I am not the first in this thread to raise this question, though I did expand upon it.
03/04/09