I guess I could pay the mag one compliment by saying I love the cover layout. The black and gray paired with Reese's photo is very eye catching. But um yeah. That's about all.
i'm a scientist... recently, i looked around at the men and women i work with and realized we are quite the homely bunch. i tried to imagine them all if they bought into social convention and did their hair, makeup, attire the way conventionally pretty people do... we're still homely. our brains make us attractive. while i think it is probably a residual of the "pretty girls get husbands that make money so they don't have to work" bit from our mothers who grew up in the fifties... my mother told me it is because people like us are smart enough that we don't need our looks, and thus, don't "take care" of ourselves the way other people do. (thanks mom, i think)
regardless... we don't claim to be physically appealing in a conventional way (despite how truly rockin some of us are) so pretty people: PLEASE STOP PRETENDING TO BE GENIUSES! (and the moment you can fill in for me for a week at work, i will be happy to eat my crow)
I'm always wryly amused by the articles on hair styling in these magazines. They have to push a ton of products, but also to deal with the fact that all their readers have different lengths and types of hair, and the fact that most women don't have time to get the "salon" results thing.
So they either dictate some kind if blanket trend that's useless, or else they give very poor instructions for an updo which, in any case only works if you have x length hair, or they do one of those features which supposedly caters to several different hair types and ends up like this:
Full page of model with straight hair: "Get the sleek look with x product and straighteners. Just smooth the straighteners down the length of your hair section by section, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Full page of same model with large, loose curls: "Turn heads with your curls! Just wind some sections round a curling tong, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Full page of same model with hair that looks pretty straight to me but is, they tell me, "wavy": "Ride the wave with product x! Scrunch dry wet hair under with a diffuser on your dryer, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Thus they cover the entire diversity of womanity, and explain nothing useful (like how to do a really good blow dry) with any clarity.
I guess I'm more worried about the lozenge-shaped gash that goes right through her torso. See the left side of her chest? You can see clear through her! Is that where the photoshoptography steals your soul from?
Wow. So within the first 5 mins up this being up, fully 50% of the comments (9/18) so far were along the lines of: where the fuck is Reese Witherspoon in this photoshop of horros? I though it was Sienna Miller/Mary-Kate and/or Ashley Olsen/Kelly Clarkson/Amber Valetta/Carmen Electra.
Don't actors sell themselves on their visibility- their uniqueness and individuality? Surely a point will come where actors agents have to halt this gryphon-like melding of womens' faces, just so their clients can be recognized. What the fuck is the point of having Reese on the cover when no one can tell its her? What can she sell with a generic face? Not her latest movie or a line of new makeup. Maybe Noxema or clothes from KMart. This is a bad idea of a marketing standpoint, leaving aside the myriad complaints there are about body image.
@SheepyPoo: The galaxy distribution in the Universe would make a gorgeous dress patter. It would probably be astronomically expensive though- only stars could afford it. :)
So if I wear a mesh shirt over a cone bra with a flannel thrown on top of it all I'll be in for spring? What happens if the bra punctures the shirt? Is that cool, too, or will I need to carry a repair kit?
@GatorGirl: I've been going to bed with damp hair from that evening's shower for years now and waking up with a perfectly coiffed bedhead pouf. And to think all along I was a style "genius" and not just someone with very little time for grooming!
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/20/09
But then I would just put on some fantastic heels, some kick-ass music and prance around my apartment until I remembered that I'm awesome again.
03/19/09
regardless... we don't claim to be physically appealing in a conventional way (despite how truly rockin some of us are) so pretty people: PLEASE STOP PRETENDING TO BE GENIUSES! (and the moment you can fill in for me for a week at work, i will be happy to eat my crow)
that's all i have to say about that.
03/19/09
WHEN WILL THE MADNESS END???!!!
03/20/09
03/19/09
So they either dictate some kind if blanket trend that's useless, or else they give very poor instructions for an updo which, in any case only works if you have x length hair, or they do one of those features which supposedly caters to several different hair types and ends up like this:
Full page of model with straight hair: "Get the sleek look with x product and straighteners. Just smooth the straighteners down the length of your hair section by section, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Full page of same model with large, loose curls: "Turn heads with your curls! Just wind some sections round a curling tong, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Full page of same model with hair that looks pretty straight to me but is, they tell me, "wavy": "Ride the wave with product x! Scrunch dry wet hair under with a diffuser on your dryer, spray on some product x and you're good to go!"
Thus they cover the entire diversity of womanity, and explain nothing useful (like how to do a really good blow dry) with any clarity.
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
Don't actors sell themselves on their visibility- their uniqueness and individuality? Surely a point will come where actors agents have to halt this gryphon-like melding of womens' faces, just so their clients can be recognized. What the fuck is the point of having Reese on the cover when no one can tell its her? What can she sell with a generic face? Not her latest movie or a line of new makeup. Maybe Noxema or clothes from KMart. This is a bad idea of a marketing standpoint, leaving aside the myriad complaints there are about body image.
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
[cmb.as.arizona.edu]
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
Turned her in to an Olsen twin.
03/19/09
Nobody should be photoshopped, really. But photoshopping someone to the point of erasing what makes them look like them just seems especially STUPID.
03/19/09
03/19/09