<![CDATA[Jezebel: gender differences]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: gender differences]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/genderdifferences http://jezebel.com/tag/genderdifferences <![CDATA[Do Parents Create Gender Differences?]]> In her new book Pink Brain, Blue Brain, neuroscientist Lise Eliot describes how tiny differences in the way parents treat babies actually create the gender differences many assume are inborn.

Discussing the book in Newsweek, Sharon Begley writes, "adults perceive baby boys and girls differently, seeing identical behavior through a gender-tinted lens." When baby girls are presented to adults as "boys," the grown-ups are more likely to see them as "angry or distressed." And they perceive male infants as more "happy and socially engaged" when they mistakenly believe they are girls. Also, moms underestimate their baby girls' climbing abilities — and parents interact less with their boy babies, perhaps because they are more irritable than girls.

Of course, the idea that boys and girls are differently socialized is nothing new. But Eliot's theory is that the differences between men's and women's brains actually stem from very tiny differences present in infancy, which are magnified by parental treatment. Boys may become less social, girls less comfortable with physical challenges, all because parents react to very small variations in behavior. According to Begley, Eliot debunks the claims "that women are hard-wired to read faces and tone of voice, to defuse conflict, and to form deep friendships; [...] that 'girls' brains are wired for communication and boys' for aggression'" and "that toy preferences-trucks or dolls-appear so early, they must be innate." Instead, she says, parental treatment causes small differences to "snowball, producing brains with different talents."

Eliot says, "kids rise or fall according to what we believe about them," and reading about her research made me wonder about the ways my own parents might have unconsciously pinked out my brain. In general, they were super-supportive and gender-neutral, but I do sometimes wonder why my brother played four organized sports while I got put in what the school euphemistically called "adaptive" PE. Part of this is almost certainly innate ability — I'm convinced that there is a gene for reliably knowing the difference between right and left, and I don't have it. But were my early signs of klutziness magnified by my parents? It's possible. I certainly felt like they protected me more than my brother — he didn't have, for instance, a two-year-long no-driving-on-the-freeway rule after he got his license. Ultimately, though, it's pretty much impossible to determine which of my spatial deficiencies come from parental protection and which from some sort of congenital ass-vs.-elbow confusion. But maybe Eliot's book will help parents recognize their unconscious prejudices — leaving people like me with only bad genes to blame.

Pink Brain, Blue Brain [Newsweek]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5352031&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bully For Them]]> This just in from "no shit studies" central: According to research collected from studies about bullies in six countries, children of authoritarian parents ("parents who are demanding, directive and unresponsive") are more likely to become bullies between the ages of nine to 16. Alternatively, children of responsive and nurturing parents are less likely to bully others. Monkey see, monkey do. Bullying also runs equally between both genders, with boys resorting to physical bullying and girls using verbal tactics to bully and humiliate the attacked. [Eureka Alert]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032848&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Balanced Breakfast]]> Do the benefits of eating breakfast differ between boys and girls? Dr. Katharina Widenhorn-Mueller thinks so: the researcher reports that research into the effectiveness of a healthy breakfast for young people shows that boys report being in a fouler mood if they go without a morning meal but many girls do not. Well, we may not be kids anymore, but going without our morning meal and coffee can put us into a horrible mood. At the end of her report, Widenhorn-Mueller calls for more research into the gender differences in breakfast studies. We suggest she start here. [Reuters]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032753&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "For decades now, girls have been told that...]]> "For decades now, girls have been told that 'you can do anything.' 'How to Be the Best at Everything,' originally published in England, might as well add ' . . . in heels and lipstick.' It promises lessons on how to 'act like a celebrity,' 'make your own luxury bubble bath' and 'give yourself a perfect manicure.' This is the 'I am woman, see me shop' strain of feminism, the one that's given rise to mother-daughter spa packages and endless reruns of 'Sex and the City.' Perhaps the shift from purchasing power to purchase empowerment was inevitable: once marriage and motherhood ceased to be the bulwarks of female identity, what remained to distinguish us from men beyond our God-given ability to accessorize?" —Peggy Orenstein, writing in yesterday's NY Times magazine. [NY Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354726&view=rss&microfeed=true