<![CDATA[Jezebel: friendly skies]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: friendly skies]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/friendlyskies http://jezebel.com/tag/friendlyskies <![CDATA[Amelia Earhart Flew. She Wasn't An Angel.]]> A fascinating profile in the New Yorker tries to bring Amelia Earhart down to Earth.

Says Hilary Swank, "Amelia Earhart is an iconic figure. She was so ahead of her time. I'm inspired by her. It's incredible this woman from Kansas who died so many years ago is still so talked about." And that abpout sums up how most people feel about Lady Lindy, even if the rest of us don't get the chance to play her. Amerlia Earhart is, without question, an icon: an independent, adventurous woman recognizable enough as both a face and an idea that she's inspired the Gap and Ms. magazine with equal ease. We know her as the first woman to fly the Atlantic, the second pilot to do so, and a mysterious figure cut down in her prime somewhere over the Pacific in 1937.

If you have read any of the major biographies of Earhart, it's true that even at the time, she was more complicated than we acknowledge: she was considered something of a show-boater, a fame-lover, whose PR and connections helped her eclipse the achievements of less glamorous and more dedicated female pilots, like Ruth Law, Louise Thaden or Gladys O'Donnell. Despite her well-known progressive stance, many have pointed out that the only jobs and commitments she really stuck with were those of fame - although an advocate for women's education, she never finished school, and gave up social work when she became famous. In short, she was a complicated person. As Judith Thurman, doubtless wary of a new, simplified canonization in the form of a new Hilary Swank vehicle, puts it, "Earhart was saintlike only as a martyr to her own ambition, who became an object of veneration and is periodically resurrected-her unvarnished glamour, like a holy man's body, still miraculously fresh."

But how much does that matter? Because there's still this.

When she lectured at colleges-as she did frequently, to promote careers for women, especially in aviation-she urged the coeds to focus on majors dominated by men, like engineering, and to postpone marriage until they had got a degree. On Earhart's own wedding day, in 1931, the thirty-three-year-old bride handed her forty-three-year-old groom, George Palmer Putnam, a remarkable letter, which read: 'You must know again my reluctance to marry, my feeling that I shatter thereby chances in work which means so much to me. . . . In our life together I shall not hold you to any medieval code of faithfulness to me, nor shall I consider myself bound to you similarly. . . . I may have to keep some place where I can go to be myself now and then, for I cannot guarantee to endure at all the confinements of even an attractive cage.'

Thurman's point is that whatever Earhart was as a woman, an individual, she's been eclipsed by the myth. She's become an "icon" with all that implies - public property whose popular perception is more enduring than any reality. But I'd say that in this case, there's nothing wrong with that. Thurman writes,

Her flights were feats of courage and endurance, but compared with the achievements of the women in her scrapbook their significance was ephemeral. Her unique experience might have yielded a memoir that would still be read, yet she published only three slight books, one of them posthumous, which were rushed out, for commercial reasons, in weeks.

And yet, her legacy is so much greater than that. Whether she deserved to be canonized in the public mind - become the face of bold female courage in a male world - is almost besides the point. There is something to be said for the fact that Amy Adams in flyer helmet and slacks, even in a gratuitous sequel like Night at the Smithsonian, can automatically spell "courageous, brave, pioneering iconoclast" to a little girl. The important thing is that that icon existed, and continued to exist, and has inspired a lot more than biopics.

Missing Woman [New Yorker]
Hilary Swank On Dating Her Agent [Google News]
Ruth Law [Early Aviators]
Biography: Louise McPhetridge Thaden [Women in Aviation]
Gladys O'Donnell

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5354782&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Delta Only Offers "Sexy" Designer Uniforms Up To A Certain Size]]> Delta Airlines has recently found itself in a bit of a pickle after hiring designer Richard Tyler to create an updated version of their "classic" bright red flight attendant uniforms—but only offering them up to size 18.

"I want them to look sexy and great, but you have to keep that classic look as well," Tyler says of his uniforms, which have reportedly received positive feedback from several employees. Employees over a Size 18, however, are out of luck, as Tyler's uniforms aren't produced above that size, a headdesk inducing decision that raises a good question: why is a standard company uniform being given exclusively to women under a certain size?

The "sexy" Delta uniforms went into effect in 2006—years before the airline merged with Northwest, whose unionized workers now say that the company has failed to provide similar uniforms for women who wear larger sizes. As Patricia Reller, vice chairwoman of the grievance committee at the flight attendants union's executive council at Northwest, tells the Atlanta Journal-Constitution,"Red is a color that attracts attention and someone, somewhere has made a decision that they don't want to attract attention to someone in a dress that's larger than a size 18. I'm very offended by it."

According to the Associated Press, "the Northwest chapter of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA has filed a grievance with the world's largest airline operator, asking it to offer the red dress up to size 28. The union hopes the grievance will go to mediation in August." Delta spokeswoman Gina Laughlin says of the uniforms: "This is Richard Tyler's collection — he designed it; he knows it better than anyone. So his perspective on how the pieces were meant to be worn, perhaps how the pieces could be best altered to fit someone — that's invaluable perspective." If only the airline valued their employees perspective as much as they valued the perspective of the man they hired to dress them.

Flight Attendant Union Sees Red Over Size Limit On Delta Uniform [Atlanta Journal-Constitution]
Some NWA Flight Attendants Want To Wear Red Dress [AP]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5312901&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Air New Zealand Creates "Nude" Safety Video To Capture Attention Of Passengers]]> Tired of being ignored by passengers who'd rather read or stare out the window instead of listening to potentially life-saving safety information, the folks at Air New Zealand have released a cheeky in-flight video featuring crew members in body paint.




The video, titled "The Bare Essentials Of Safety," features several crew members wearing "uniforms" made of body paint- a slightly scandalous choice done to draw passengers attention to simple instructions that might make a world of difference in the event of an emergency. Of course, the ads a re also a great way of advertising for the company: the video has already gone viral, and the company has been promoting itself with the slogan "At Air New Zealand, our fares have nothing to hide." Steve Bayliss, the general marketing manager of the company, says of the ads: "We think in tough times there's a premium for making people smile, and it gives the opportunity to stand out in a crowd." Or, perhaps, they just wanted to do something special, for all the airplane-flying ladies of the world?




New Zealand Airline Issues Nude Safety Video"

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5307098&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Brief History Of Stewardess Porn…]]> Would you believe if I told you that in some regions of the world stewardesses are sort of expected to be SEX SYMBOLS? Well, Air India just grounded some flight attendants on charges of being FAT. ONLY IN INDIA, right? Wrong! As you'll learn if you click the picture, sexist policies w/r/t flight attending have a long and sordid history in this very country! But damn if those Southwest babes didn't have nice gams back in the day. [BBC]

Here international airlines are ranked on the basis of stewardess hotness. You'll note Australian airline Qantas is on the list but Qantas is totally a respectable airline, I don't think they have ever crashed and they fired that stewardess who had mile high sex with Ralph Fiennes.

Here's a picture I found from a blog post I found on the history of sexy stewardess uniforms and another blog post on the history of sexism w/r/t sexy stewardesses.

And here's an old Southwest Airlines commercial.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014092&view=rss&microfeed=true