It's stupid to throw up your hands and give up on trying to end some cruelty in the world just because it's near impossible to live a strictly cruelty-free lifestyle. I'm a vegetarian, but I'm not going to go out and eat a steak while wearing a fox fur coat just because I shaved my legs this morning.
If you have the opportunity to do a bit of good in the world, you should do it. Just because I can't singlehandedly end world poverty doesn't mean I shouldn't make donations to groups who want to ease the suffering of some.
If you can reduce meat consumption from your diet, that's great. At the very least, you're definitely doing your part to help save the environment. And unless you live in the Arctic and hunt your own animals, you don't need a fur coat (I consider the fur industry to be one of the utmost cruelest thing one can contribute their money to).
@onestrawplz: Seconded!!!
I'm not a vegetarian but I deliberately reduce my meat/animal product consumption for environmental reasons. And I'm not perfect. I love the Peter Singer idea put forward in 'The Ethics of What We Eat'. Everyone has budget constraints and a history (personal and familial) that defines their eating but we can always do BETTER. Not be perfect, be better. So you try not to fuck up, but sometimes you do.
@onestrawplz: I agree with you. I see the angle Steiner is coming from, but I don't agree.
Any little thing we can due to ease the suffering we should do.
We aren't going to stop factory farms by not eating turkey on Thursday, but we may just get a few people thinking about what they are eating - not talking being preachy here, just by simple example. If not, that's ok too.
It'd be nice if people could see some of the images taken from fur factories prior to contributing to them.
Horrific!
Synthetic materials are getting better and better. We don't live on the tundra (most of us anyway) so that excuse is bunk. Plus there's heating in most every building these days.
@onestrawplz: Thanks for this. Do what you want to do. If cruelty bothers you, don't participate in it--to whatever degree works for you now. That effort is not about your personal perfection. That "it's impossible to be perfect, so forget it" argument is as old as the hills, and I don't know one reasonable vegan or vegetarian that is considering giving up their aversion to cruelty because they just can't "be perfect". That's ridiculous, and it's insulting to me to have my effort to reduce suffering transmuted into some quest for individual perfection.
Anyone else think PETA is part of problem in anyone being able to take A. animal rights seriously and B. a lot of people feeling like, screw those folks, I'm getting fur? Their recent campaigns have been terrible. It's like they're deliberately approaching the topic in a way least likely to gain them any support. I can't blame anyone for finding them obnoxious, I can't stand them either and I actually agree with the underlying issues.
I think, whatever way people try to live more ethically, is a positive thing. Whether it's being strict vegan, vegetarian, occasional meat eater, whatever. If we try to maintain some moral hierarchy then we've sort of lost the point. The point is to get more people actively involved in doing more ethical things, as a habit. Because even just not eating meat 2 days a week makes an impact. Which is what we need to focus on, not trying to make everyone do it the same way.
I don't need everyone else to be a vegetarian just because I am, nor do I feel like a superior person for doing so. Not everyone is going to stop eating meat and, so long as they don't try to force me to, I don't really care. It seems more useful, to me, to teach people how all of this stuff if interconnected and important so they'll make better decisions overall.
@tiredfairy: I think the methods of PETA and their unpopularity are problematic, but I think Anna is right that vegetarian diets are becoming more of a topic for mainstream discourse. The NYTimes has been publishing an increasing number of articles on vegetarianism during the past couple years, and some of them have been pretty good. The Steiner article is definitely the most forceful one I've seen, and I still liked it.
It's too bad about PETA, because I think their website is actually pretty informative, but I'd never point anyone there because of the (well-earned) PETA stigma.
My takeaway: No matter how hardcore you think you are, there's always going to be someone who looks on you disdainfully because they are, in fact, more hardcore.
So, righteous vegans, please step to the left over there with the Hasidim and the MMA fighters.
While everyone should do what they can for the environment and to better the treatment of animals, for so many people it is simply impossible to opt out. If you are poor and live in an inner city, where are you going to find all these organic products, or even fresh vegetables? I live in a small city in NYS and we don't have a grocery store. Not one. Bodegas, and an Italian speciality shop, but no grocery store and many folks here rely on public transportation and public assistance. And what about diabetics? Isn't insulin an animal product? I do my best to support my local farmers and buy from them what I can, but I also have a budget to stick to, and sometimes the better choices (environmentally, ethically) are just out of my reach. And I'm not poor. I'm not saying we shouldn't discuss and try to change the system - especially factory farming, which squiks me the fuck out - just to keep in mind that consumer choices can be limited by class and access. (And, of course, education, which is why discussions like this are important - I never thought about the gelatin used in a lot of drugs.)
@La Chica Lucy: Okey, why do people not get that these issue are connected?
OF COURSE consumer choices are limited by class and access. The system responsible for factory farming is the very same one that makes people so poor that they can only buy shit to eat. They're only separate issues if your perspective of them is very narrow.
@cwisto moweina has got yer goat: Yeah, I'm not an idiot - and, as I stated, I believe that we should discuss and try to change the system, and educate people more. I'm just pointing out that a lot of people have no to little choice, and for them, conversations like this are irrelevant in their day-to-day scraping by. I didn't say we shouldn't talk about it and I didn't say that these are separate issues.
@cwisto moweina has got yer goat: Agreed. As someone who is concerned with ethical eating/living, I am certainly aware that I can afford to be concerned only because I have a certain amount of privilege in my position and lifestyle. I don't make a lot (just barely above $20,ooo/year [which isn't bad comparatively]), but I also don't have kids and live in a relatively cheap small city that does have a lot of options in regards to groceries/farms/farmers' markets.
Can people stop saying that they can't get upset about x issue because y issue applies to humans. One of the great things about being human is that we have to ability to multi-task and care about more than one issue at once. None of these issues are mutually exclusive and it oversimplifies things to say that you can't be bothered by something because this other issue bugs you. Even thought the majority of us never do anything about any of these issues!
@WashingMyHair: Amen. Everyone has one or two issues that really resonate with them, and I don't think anyone has the right to question the worth of those concerns.
@WashingMyHair: I came to the conclusion years ago that if everyone focused all their effort on the greatest threat to the survival of our species (I recognize you are talking about rights, but hear me out...) then we would all be working to prevent another asteroid disaster.
So, if someone uses that fallacious argument ("but, there are more important issues!") just ask them:
"Oh yea, so what are you doing to prevent an asteroid strike?"
@Kitten is an 80s rocker: And - although I could be wrong, here - no one seemed to be arguing that donating to the No on Prop 8 and Obama campaigns last year was the equivalent of not caring about malnourished children or human trafficking. But doesn't the same logic apply? My NPR donation is about helping people and not animals, but it's not saving any lives, or the rainforest, or curing AIDS.
@Penny_Esq: I think that's a really good point. I think we should applaud people who give time, talent, or treasure (as they used to say in church) to make the world a little better, and not quibble about how worthy the cause is.
Do people seriously wear fur? I must live on planet Berkeley, because I really never see fur in my daily life and if you live outside of the arctic circle, I can't see any practical need for it. Who are these people who have increased their fur consumption in the past decade? WHERE DO I LIVE?!
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: it's hugely popular amongst those with cashola in the south. most of my girlfriends have a piece of fur. i still haven't been able to reconcile it. furry mammals are just too cute!!
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: My great grandmother has a full-length mink coat her third husband bought her while they were living in Austin around 2000. Apparently, that was quite the thing and all the ladies had one. My grandmother claimed future dibs on it when my great grandma dies, but my sister, my mother, and I all looked at her as if she was claiming dibs on the shit my grandma's cocker spaniel left on the back lawn. So short answer, yes, people wear fur. If you're not living in the arctic circle, it remains a conspicuous consumption thing.
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: It's common in Chicago (among people rich enough to afford it, which means mostly older women). I moved here from California/Washington where fur is still verboten, but... it's no different than leather, and there is literally no material on Earth warmer in midwest winters than fur. When you're a 90-pound, 70-year old woman in minus-20 weather, I will not fault your choice of fur. If I stay here permanently, I may invest in a half-length fur coat.
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: I live in practically the arctic and I don't think I've ever seen anyone wear real fur before. I've seen the fake shit in like hat linings or boot linings, but a full fledged winter coat? Nope. It just isn't practical in a cold climate (as backwards crazy as that sounds).
@small-fox: Um, fur is definitely different than leather. Do a little research on how animals used for fur are treated. Ever heard of anal electruction? Skinning while alive? Yeah, not exactly pleasant.
Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini promoted this comment
Hippopotame begs you to promote her comments. was starred
Hippopotame begs you to promote her comments. was unstarred
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: Regardless, if I go out in January, especially in the evening, I see quite a few walking around. Go to the opera in winter and there's more fur than you can shake a stick at. There is also a sizeable fur coat section at Macy's, Bloomingdale's, and Neiman Marcus, as well as several independent retail outlets which sell nothing but furs. If they weren't selling, they wouldn't be stocked, and there certainly wouldn't be fur-only stores. I'm sure you see more of them in places like downtown Chicago (and the opera/fancy restaurants) because of simple economics. Floor-length mink does not come cheap.
@Hippopotame begs you to promote her comments.: "Um" Yes, I have. I'm well aware of fur farming practices, and I do not think it's any different than eating chicken or wearing leather. It's a personal belief, and you are free to disagree, but do not imply that I am naive or willfully ignorant because I disagree.
"One lapidary conclusion to be drawn here is that people take deadly seriously the prerogative to use animals as sources of satisfaction. Not only for food, but as beasts of burden, as raw materials and as sources of captive entertainment — which is the way animals are used in zoos, circuses and the like."
So...no more animals as beasts of burden? Why don't we just erase thousands of years of human progress? I see a huge difference between a bear on a leash in a circus and an ox pulling a plow on some subsistence farm in a developing country. Humans have been using animals since what, Ancient Mesopotamia and before? Domestication != mistreatment. (Oh, and the author has a pet cat.)
@mass romantic: Funny to consider that before the domestication of the horse (marked as a major turning point in civilization), we used horses for food. What is preferable?
@WashingMyHair: I could be wrong, but I thought that current belief is that we didn't domesticate dogs either. They found it useful to hang around our camps and get scraps, we found it useful to have them around warning us when there were predators. Symbiosis.
@scarletbegonia: I believe they still do in Europe. I know now, although I didn't at the time, that I had a horse burger in Bristol in 1993, because a lot of places in the UK weren't serving beef due to the mad cow outbreak. I told my dad I though my burger tasted sort of funny, and he said it was probably just the seasoning they used in the ground beef, but a few years later he told me he knew it was horse meat and didn't want to freak me out.
@Penny_Esq: Yeah, eating horse is still done. I had horse in Belgium and France as late as 2006. I didn't really want to eat it (I will swallow just about anything in someones home in the name of being polite) but as an omnivore I don't really have a problem with other people eating horse. Just like, no I wouldn't eat a puppy because I was raised to think of puppies as adorable and not food. If another society sees differently, well, while that is remarkably horrific to me, I suppose I can't really think that if I want to eat chicken and sushi.
I was vegetarian for about two years, and recently stopped because of my own health...which is why I started, so I was never militant.
I don't like factory farming, either, but there are too many animals and not enough open space. I have lots of vegetarian and vegan friends, but I get so annoyed when people run around screaming "but the animals, but the animals!" without even considering the difficulties of fixing the system.
One vegan friend of mine was always trying to convince me to join her, but I was in ED recovery and my nutritionist and doctor wouldn't think of letting me risk protein or calcium deficiency. So, also don't forget about PEOPLE when considering the animals.
@scarletbegonia: Yeah but you have to consider that something like 2 billion animals are bred each year solely for meat consumption. So it's not like we'd be overrun by cows if people stopped eating meat.
I'm a vegan, and I became one for ethical reasons. I don't believe that non-humans are here for the use of humans - they're here for their own reasons, and to live their own lives.
I learned a long time ago not to feel like a terrible person for accidentally using or consuming things that come from animals, because as this piece mentions, those by-products are sneaky mofos. They're in the things you'd least expect (like isinglass - wine, really??). My thing is to do everything I can to avoid perpetuating the cycle of animal suffering and exploitation, and if I happen to slip up, I feel better knowing that I've learned a lesson about what products to avoid. That's really all you can do.
@edackk: I'm not vegan or even a veg....getting closer. However, I do as much as I can and as I learn more, adjust to more ethical ways. I find the all or nothing approach setting one up for failure or just an excuse for others to never take responsibility for their own actions.
@edackk: The isinglass thing really pissed me off when I found out about it. You can get vegan wines, but there's no requirement that the label say how the wine was refined, so they can be hard to find at your local Safeway. I generally give myself a pass on the wine thing. Also on prescription meds, since it's not like you can choose between gelatin or non-gelatin capsules, generally.
And dude! I had no idea about bandaids and razors. WTF?! Does anyone have a vegan razor they recommend?
@edackk: Word! Although having looked at the website a bit more, it looks like it's just an online store. Sad face. But still! Cheaper shipping, maybe.
The 'all-or-nothing' attitude is a little obsessive and unhealthy, if you ask me. Being aware of what one consumes and how that item is farmed/manufactured and adjusting accordingly, when it is possible and desirable, is the way forward. Finding out the information is sometimes enough to make the decision for you - For eg, I'm not Jewish, but I can't eat non-kosher hotdogs since I found out most of them contain actual excrement, not to mention minced up nasty bits - bumholes etc; I couldn't buy a cheap burger for the same reason (actually prefer vegeburgers); and will only eat free-range organic chicken and grass-fed American beef. This is expensive, so it becomes self-regulating as I can't afford to eat meat every day (nor would I want to, actually).
@Diziet_Sma: I've always heard things like this about hot dogs, but how can that be even close to legal? It reminds me of reading The Jungle by Upton Sinclair in high school.
@bookling: I'm sure it isn't; but slaughterhouses are messy places, and it is only leftovers that make it into sausages, burgers, etc. Basically, I don't trust anything minced up. Not to worry - Hebrew National make the best dogs, anyway!
@edackk: I really don't think Diziet_Sma was being judgmental against vegans. I think she just meant that everyone needs to figure out what works with their lifestyle and ethical beliefs and go with it. No matter how you live, you're probably doing damage to animals and the environment, and it's a matter of finding a level of damage that you're comfortable with. She was just saying that if you screw it up, keep trying, because everything makes a difference.
I think this conversation echos the earlier conversation about moms. I don't care if you're vegan, just STFU about it. It's not the practice, it's the moral posturing that sometimes comes along with it.
I love vegans! I love moms! I don't care for annoying assholes.
@Penny: Lol, yes, assholes with children are just asshole parents, and assholes who don't use animal products are just asshole vegans...but nonetheless assholes.
@Penny: You deserve the common sense award for the day.
As a person that has to live with a fairly strict adherence to a diet, I understand the challenge that vegans face. It's not the same thing, but I too cannot have cross contamination in my life. That said, I would much prefer either good manners or shuttingTFU.
@Penny: I agree, and as a vegan I have never tried to convince all the carnivores around me to stop eating meat. But I have to tell you, I get a lot of grief from some of them, including my ex-boyfriend and his family (which made it easier to break up with him). It's funny the first few times and I can take a joke, but it gets really tired...especially when I hear the same "eat meat" comments from one of my roommates on almost a daily basis. So just remember meat-eaters can be annoying assholes too. :-)
@Penny: I don't tell people I'm a vegetarian a lot of the time because they think I'm morally posturing just by stating that fact. The last few times someone else has told someone I just met that I'm a vegetarian, they immediately launch into some sort of justification for meat-eating and ask me all kinds of annoying questions. I wish they'd just STFU.
While I understand those who are all about animal rights and against any type of animal exploitation/cruelty, for me there are too many human abuses that still occur for me to get too riled up. Call me a speciest.
@badmutha: Animal cruelty and human abuse aren't mutually exclusive. They're intertwined in every way and I have no problem trying to educate myself and doing something about both.
@badmutha: I'm definitely in the camp that cares strongly about animal issues, but I appreciate how rational and non-judgy you are about your stance. I feel like a lot of people who care about animal issues get shouted down and labeled as stupid/frivolous/uneducated by people who think that we can't help animals until we help people.
I take real issue with this statement because I think there's a widespread misconception that humans don't fall under the scope of animal rights. We're animals, and I believe just as strongly in human rights as I do non-human rights. All life is sacred, and all exploitation is interconnected.
So, I'm with you on the whole 'vegans who ignore human rights' thing - they're missing the point.
@badmutha: But! Have you heard that convincing argument about how we won't be able to stop killing each other and start treating each other with dignity until we're at least able to figure out how to do it to animals?
@badmutha: I care about both, but certainly more about human issues. Especially since one huge "human issue" is getting the world's people better nutrition, or food period.
@msridiculous447: I'm a vegetarian with a lot of veg friends, and from my experience, at least, regard for animal rights is so stigmatized now that even most of my fellow vegetarians will dismiss it. Like, they're all doing it strictly over concern about land use and global food supplies and hog waste runoff and if you bring up humane treatment it's like you're an unenlightened loon who's making the rest of us look bad. It's weird, and a little depressing.
@Everything MidnightBikeRide does is a balloon.: I definitely have had the same experience. As if saying, "Hey, I love animals, I feel a moral imperative not to kill them for food," makes you a super-lefty-wacko who thinks people shouldn't be able to keep dogs and cats as pets.
@Everything MidnightBikeRide does is a balloon.: I really agree with this statement. I am much more concerned about animal welfare than human welfare, which is definitely not a popular viewpoint. In my view, the whole world (ideally) is trying to make the world better for humans, but who's speaking for the animals? I'm probably going to get flamed for this post, haha.
@badmutha: Assuming these are two separate issues ignores the heart of the problem, that all forms of cruelty and abuse are symptoms of the same disease: the perpetuation of violence and greed across humanity. Whether we are using/abusing/neglecting either people or animals for our own gain or comfort, we are perpetuating violence and a creating the toxic environment that merely begets more violence.
@msridiculous447: I'm glad somebody else has seen that, because I feel like every one else on earth thinks that the opposite must be true and that vegetarians get together to chat about animal rights all day. It kind of reminds me of really self-consciously "pragmatic" democrats, who go on about how they want healthcare but not any of that extremist nutjob single-payer healthcare, ha ha! And I'm like "Hey, wait a minute...."
@Kitten is an 80s rocker: honestly, you're not alone. I find it so much easier to care about animals and children (yes, they are on the same elevated plane in my mind), because they are absolutely innocent and are completely at the mercy of adult humans not to hurt/mistreat/use them. I only have so much brain space and not an unlimited capacity to care equally about every cause and my heart tends to bleed more for the absolutely innocent. It may not be popular or pretty, but it is my personal limitation and I would be lying if I didn't acknowledge it.
@pajanguin: but, that's not a convincing argument at all. the logic is all backwards. shouldn't not killing those who are most like us be easier than not killing those who are not?
Edited by cwisto moweina has got yer goat at 11/23/09 7:21 PM
cwisto moweina has got yer goat was starred
cwisto moweina has got yer goat was unstarred
I literally just wrote a blog post about the fur article Todd Lynn is quoted in. Great minds and all that.
I eat meat, so I take the attitude that if an animal is going to die for me I should use as much of it and not waste anything. I don't believe that it's ethically wrong to kill an well cared for animal for food and clothing and by-products, but I would find it wrong to be wasteful with that animal. As my granny said when killing a pig...you should use everything but the oink.
However that doesn't mean you need to have meat with every single meal you eat. I'm trying to cut back for reduce my carbon footprint. I'm also probably not sounding very clear on my stance here either.
@gherkinfiend: That argument may stand for leather (so far as clothing goes, I mean) but fur is a totally different story. The animals killed for their fur are not being eaten, their bodies aren't used to moisture strips on razors or gelatin in marshmallows. It's wasteful and disgusting, and the methods by which they kill and skin these animals would make anyone squeamish, vegan or meat eater.
I love the idea of living off the land, of hunting and not wasting a bit of that animal, but that has no real world practicality right now, at least not if you're the average consumer. It's hard worrying about being an ethical consumer on top of monetary and personal problems and whatever else! Which is why I am a beegan.
Like, if I have a sore throat, you know I'm gonna down that honey. Or if I'm baking and out of agave. Fuck bees, get honey.
@gherkinfiend: so, if you're taking a stance that we should use "everything but the oink," you must be slaughtering your own livestock, right?
capitalist meat-production—in practice, and in the very, bottom-line nature of capital—don't use the whole animal. waste is enormous. and i bet the sheepskin in a regular pair of uggs did not come from a sheep that was made into mutton, or marbles, that the sinews weren't used, that nobody ate the brain, tongue or eyeballs (all edible).
i completely agree with the stance that _every_ animal life taken (and all the expensive resources that come along with raising that animal), should it be used in the service of human consumption, should be used in a way that reduces waste both of the animal and of those same resources. it is, absolutely, an ethical view to take. but i doubt that most people (kudos, though, if i'm wrong about your consumption habits) take those matters into their own hands. and since they don't, it means that they don't abide by this same ethical principle.
Re: Organically grown foods. The label "organic" varies legally, and does not necessarily constitute what you perceive as true organic farming techniques. Also, overfarming, even organic ones, can still lead to salinization of soils. It's worth looking into locally if these matters are important to you.
Also, I'll never forget one day, about 1993, this woman came into the Tower Records I worked at, wearing leather head to toe, leather purse, shoes, belt, clothes, everything. On her purse was a large pin that said, "Save the Whales." Yeah, I thought, "Fuck the cows."
11/24/09
If you have the opportunity to do a bit of good in the world, you should do it. Just because I can't singlehandedly end world poverty doesn't mean I shouldn't make donations to groups who want to ease the suffering of some.
If you can reduce meat consumption from your diet, that's great. At the very least, you're definitely doing your part to help save the environment. And unless you live in the Arctic and hunt your own animals, you don't need a fur coat (I consider the fur industry to be one of the utmost cruelest thing one can contribute their money to).
11/24/09
I'm not a vegetarian but I deliberately reduce my meat/animal product consumption for environmental reasons. And I'm not perfect. I love the Peter Singer idea put forward in 'The Ethics of What We Eat'. Everyone has budget constraints and a history (personal and familial) that defines their eating but we can always do BETTER. Not be perfect, be better. So you try not to fuck up, but sometimes you do.
11/24/09
Any little thing we can due to ease the suffering we should do.
We aren't going to stop factory farms by not eating turkey on Thursday, but we may just get a few people thinking about what they are eating - not talking being preachy here, just by simple example. If not, that's ok too.
It'd be nice if people could see some of the images taken from fur factories prior to contributing to them.
Horrific!
Synthetic materials are getting better and better. We don't live on the tundra (most of us anyway) so that excuse is bunk. Plus there's heating in most every building these days.
11/24/09
11/23/09
I think, whatever way people try to live more ethically, is a positive thing. Whether it's being strict vegan, vegetarian, occasional meat eater, whatever. If we try to maintain some moral hierarchy then we've sort of lost the point. The point is to get more people actively involved in doing more ethical things, as a habit. Because even just not eating meat 2 days a week makes an impact. Which is what we need to focus on, not trying to make everyone do it the same way.
I don't need everyone else to be a vegetarian just because I am, nor do I feel like a superior person for doing so. Not everyone is going to stop eating meat and, so long as they don't try to force me to, I don't really care. It seems more useful, to me, to teach people how all of this stuff if interconnected and important so they'll make better decisions overall.
11/24/09
It's too bad about PETA, because I think their website is actually pretty informative, but I'd never point anyone there because of the (well-earned) PETA stigma.
11/23/09
So, righteous vegans, please step to the left over there with the Hasidim and the MMA fighters.
11/23/09
11/23/09
OF COURSE consumer choices are limited by class and access. The system responsible for factory farming is the very same one that makes people so poor that they can only buy shit to eat. They're only separate issues if your perspective of them is very narrow.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
So, if someone uses that fallacious argument ("but, there are more important issues!") just ask them:
"Oh yea, so what are you doing to prevent an asteroid strike?"
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/24/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
#tips
11/23/09
"One lapidary conclusion to be drawn here is that people take deadly seriously the prerogative to use animals as sources of satisfaction. Not only for food, but as beasts of burden, as raw materials and as sources of captive entertainment — which is the way animals are used in zoos, circuses and the like."
So...no more animals as beasts of burden? Why don't we just erase thousands of years of human progress? I see a huge difference between a bear on a leash in a circus and an ox pulling a plow on some subsistence farm in a developing country. Humans have been using animals since what, Ancient Mesopotamia and before? Domestication != mistreatment. (Oh, and the author has a pet cat.)
11/23/09
11/23/09
(She types as her cat sits there looking at her expectantly, demanding both food and cuddles in that order.)
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
I don't like factory farming, either, but there are too many animals and not enough open space. I have lots of vegetarian and vegan friends, but I get so annoyed when people run around screaming "but the animals, but the animals!" without even considering the difficulties of fixing the system.
One vegan friend of mine was always trying to convince me to join her, but I was in ED recovery and my nutritionist and doctor wouldn't think of letting me risk protein or calcium deficiency. So, also don't forget about PEOPLE when considering the animals.
11/23/09
11/23/09
I learned a long time ago not to feel like a terrible person for accidentally using or consuming things that come from animals, because as this piece mentions, those by-products are sneaky mofos. They're in the things you'd least expect (like isinglass - wine, really??). My thing is to do everything I can to avoid perpetuating the cycle of animal suffering and exploitation, and if I happen to slip up, I feel better knowing that I've learned a lesson about what products to avoid. That's really all you can do.
11/23/09
11/23/09
And dude! I had no idea about bandaids and razors. WTF?! Does anyone have a vegan razor they recommend?
11/23/09
Vegan groceries to the rescue!
11/23/09
11/23/09
ETA: Holy shit! That place is in my town! I can go browse the aisles in person! Excellent! Loud noises!
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
@bookling: I'm sure it isn't; but slaughterhouses are messy places, and it is only leftovers that make it into sausages, burgers, etc. Basically, I don't trust anything minced up. Not to worry - Hebrew National make the best dogs, anyway!
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
I love vegans! I love moms! I don't care for annoying assholes.
11/23/09
11/23/09
As a person that has to live with a fairly strict adherence to a diet, I understand the challenge that vegans face. It's not the same thing, but I too cannot have cross contamination in my life. That said, I would much prefer either good manners or shuttingTFU.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
I take real issue with this statement because I think there's a widespread misconception that humans don't fall under the scope of animal rights. We're animals, and I believe just as strongly in human rights as I do non-human rights. All life is sacred, and all exploitation is interconnected.
So, I'm with you on the whole 'vegans who ignore human rights' thing - they're missing the point.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
unless you were kidding....
11/23/09
"...shouldn't not killing those who are most like us be easier than not killing those who are not?"
"Comrade! Let us band together against the animals, for great justice!"
Yeah, I don't see that approach solving the Israeli/Palistine conflict anytime soon, sorry.
11/25/09
11/23/09
I eat meat, so I take the attitude that if an animal is going to die for me I should use as much of it and not waste anything. I don't believe that it's ethically wrong to kill an well cared for animal for food and clothing and by-products, but I would find it wrong to be wasteful with that animal. As my granny said when killing a pig...you should use everything but the oink.
However that doesn't mean you need to have meat with every single meal you eat. I'm trying to cut back for reduce my carbon footprint. I'm also probably not sounding very clear on my stance here either.
11/23/09
I love the idea of living off the land, of hunting and not wasting a bit of that animal, but that has no real world practicality right now, at least not if you're the average consumer. It's hard worrying about being an ethical consumer on top of monetary and personal problems and whatever else! Which is why I am a beegan.
Like, if I have a sore throat, you know I'm gonna down that honey. Or if I'm baking and out of agave. Fuck bees, get honey.
11/23/09
capitalist meat-production—in practice, and in the very, bottom-line nature of capital—don't use the whole animal. waste is enormous. and i bet the sheepskin in a regular pair of uggs did not come from a sheep that was made into mutton, or marbles, that the sinews weren't used, that nobody ate the brain, tongue or eyeballs (all edible).
i completely agree with the stance that _every_ animal life taken (and all the expensive resources that come along with raising that animal), should it be used in the service of human consumption, should be used in a way that reduces waste both of the animal and of those same resources. it is, absolutely, an ethical view to take. but i doubt that most people (kudos, though, if i'm wrong about your consumption habits) take those matters into their own hands. and since they don't, it means that they don't abide by this same ethical principle.
11/23/09
Recommend.
You don't always need meat. I say this as a somewhat ashamed lover of hot dogs.
11/23/09
Also, I'll never forget one day, about 1993, this woman came into the Tower Records I worked at, wearing leather head to toe, leather purse, shoes, belt, clothes, everything. On her purse was a large pin that said, "Save the Whales." Yeah, I thought, "Fuck the cows."
11/23/09
First and foremost, I want to know what I am buying.