Actually, that childhood sexual abuse vignette is extraordinarily well done for a comic. The cage imagery was probably intentional and definitely works for the subject. I also like the formless nothingness silhouetted in the doorway.
Why does black and white line drawn 3 year old Oprah look so much less horrifying than full color 3 year old Oprah?
@LikeChai: I agree. I understand that since it's a drawing, it will be stylized, but at least attempt to make the character's body look close to what she really looks like.
As a woman who DRAWS comic books, it's always important to me to depict characters (women and men included) of different body types. And when drawing actual people, it's even more imperative to draw them how they actually look. Clearly they picked a rather 'B' artist to handle this project, so it's hard to say if the decision came from the editor 'oh, no. Draw her thin. We want to sell this to girls.' or an immature artist who doesn't like drawing a variety of body types.
Regardless, it's pretty clear to see it's a bad project. I'm not even sure what's happening in that first panel. Is she shitting sparkly tendrils? Probably.
First off, "biographical comic books"? Is that actually a genre? Second, um yes, they should draw her true to size please, thanks. It really isn't that much of a challenge, look at Coop for inspiration, even if she isn't that hot.
@sandrastewart: There are many comic books/graphic novels that are biographical. In addition to this Female Force series, there are autobiographical comics by people like Ariel Schrag, Marjane Satrapi (of Peresopolis fame), and Art Spiegelman.
First, I think there was about as much thought behind how they were presenting her visually as there was in the overall line. Which is to say, not a lot. They put out comics quick and cheap and it shows. I'm not knocking that...it's clearly working for them. But I highly doubt there was much consideration for what they were presenting.
That said, comics is not one monolithic industry. I've worked in it for the better part of 10 years and there are as many genre's in comics as there are in lit or film. It's really and truly not all superhero's. And in most independent comics, or comics that are not supehero oriented, you'll find lots of different body types...not to mention ethnicities, sexual orientations, and types of characters. Strangers in Paradise, Scott Pilgrim, Fun Home, the work of the Hernandez brothers, Jill Thompson, Colleen Doran, Linda Medley, Faith Erin Hicks, Peter Gross, Amanda Connor...and many others.
One of my favorite artists, Ross Campbell, does some of the most diverse looking characters in the medium...check out Wet Moon. Curvy, slim, black, white, shaved heads, pink hair, lost limbs, etc.
So, to be frank, there's no excuse for this comic to have this kind of "idealized" figure type, especially when the target audience must be girls, and the genre its in has a long history of being way more diverse.
My husband has always been a huge fan of Terry Moore's "Strangers in Paradise" series, and when I showed him this post, he pointed out why--it's a female-led series with women of different body types--one embodies more of what you'd expect in a graphic novel, but both are shown with lumps and bumps that are inherent to any woman. It's certainly a nice alternative to buying into this stuff, even if it is celebrating successes of real women...
Seeing this makes me want to a.) buy him the whole series and then b.) read it for myself.
I just clicked on the link to her "actual size" photo, and she's wearing the same dress one of the bridesmaids in my wedding will be wearing. I don't know how to feel about that.
Looking at the photo in the link she's very pretty. She's also in bed with a dude in the panel shown. I think it's a missed opportunity that a comic meant to inspire teen girls couldn't show a great thing. In real life girls of all sizes are found attractive and find meaningful relationships.
@Little Time Bomb: This is part of what's bothering me. It's not even like they "made over" a woman who's not at all conventionally attractive - Meyer IS conventionally attractive, she's just shaped like a 30-something American mom and not Wonder Woman. Why is that so unacceptable?
@CassandraSays: Well, I wouldn't say she's shaped like a "30-something American mom" as not all moms have that shape, some are thinner, some are bigger. She's shaped like herself, but yeah, she's pretty and they should have stuck closer to her real figure.
@Red-headed bookworm: I'm just not seeing any reason why a comic about a famous person can't have the character look like that actual person. So she's not what comic artists think of as the ideal woman - so what? She's meant to be an author, not a superhero.
Draw her however you want the fact that the people in charge of "Female Force" think Stephenie Meyer is the most empowering woman around is much more vomit inducing.
Cunning_Linguist promoted this comment
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was starred
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was unstarred
Ugh, this is annoying. And, at least from my culturally extremely-critical perspective, dangerous at worst, offensive at best.
Dangerous because it's further cementing the notion that no matter what--even if you invent sparkly vampires--you're only worth attention if you're pretty*, and if you're not pretty then you're not worth attention. That's a large part of why younger and younger women (and older women too) have such tortured relationships with their bodies, and I've seen too many women's lives get fucked up by eating disorders not to be highly critical of subtle cultural cues that enforce misogynist, unhealthy standards. Offensive because it's "correcting" Meyer's body--but there isn't anything wrong with her body.
*I'm using "pretty" here in the most normative, and thus anti-fat, way imaginable, not unlike comic book versions of the female body.
11/27/09
11/27/09
Why does black and white line drawn 3 year old Oprah look so much less horrifying than full color 3 year old Oprah?
11/27/09
11/27/09
I've made a few changes. I think they were necessary.
11/27/09
ps.: every time I write Oprah, I want to add an "e" Operah
11/27/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
10/11/09
10/12/09
10/11/09
Regardless, it's pretty clear to see it's a bad project. I'm not even sure what's happening in that first panel. Is she shitting sparkly tendrils? Probably.
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/12/09
10/11/09
That said, comics is not one monolithic industry. I've worked in it for the better part of 10 years and there are as many genre's in comics as there are in lit or film. It's really and truly not all superhero's. And in most independent comics, or comics that are not supehero oriented, you'll find lots of different body types...not to mention ethnicities, sexual orientations, and types of characters. Strangers in Paradise, Scott Pilgrim, Fun Home, the work of the Hernandez brothers, Jill Thompson, Colleen Doran, Linda Medley, Faith Erin Hicks, Peter Gross, Amanda Connor...and many others.
One of my favorite artists, Ross Campbell, does some of the most diverse looking characters in the medium...check out Wet Moon. Curvy, slim, black, white, shaved heads, pink hair, lost limbs, etc.
So, to be frank, there's no excuse for this comic to have this kind of "idealized" figure type, especially when the target audience must be girls, and the genre its in has a long history of being way more diverse.
10/11/09
Seeing this makes me want to a.) buy him the whole series and then b.) read it for myself.
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
Dangerous because it's further cementing the notion that no matter what--even if you invent sparkly vampires--you're only worth attention if you're pretty*, and if you're not pretty then you're not worth attention. That's a large part of why younger and younger women (and older women too) have such tortured relationships with their bodies, and I've seen too many women's lives get fucked up by eating disorders not to be highly critical of subtle cultural cues that enforce misogynist, unhealthy standards. Offensive because it's "correcting" Meyer's body--but there isn't anything wrong with her body.
*I'm using "pretty" here in the most normative, and thus anti-fat, way imaginable, not unlike comic book versions of the female body.