Each time a member of the FLDS is brought to trial on criminal charges against children or women, it is a moment to define history and begin to save thousands who are oppressed under a belief system that violates the rights of those women and children, and our Constitution itself.
The men in positions of power (there are no women who hold the priesthood) bare more than religious swords over their followers heads. They control the economic, emotional, and social power from birth until death. This is a system of abuse from start to finish.
Jessop is part of that system and indeed, a family, of patriarchs that practice extreme control over others, and will not hesitate to inflict violence and death for subversion (blood atonement). Whether or not he is guilty of this particular charge or set of charges, the pattern is clear, and traceable for about 100 years, with escalation in the past 30 or so. I hope he, and the others, are convicted and that it brings a spotlight bright as the sun upon the 'Yearning for Zion' compound and other FLDS strongholds.
I wish I wasn't so angry about this. I've lived my life in the two states most accepting of FLDS practices, and I'm infuriated that these state governments do nothing but turn a blind eye to what is happening. I understand that they go after charges they think they can win, but it still really gets me riled up. Clearly I'll never sit on a jury in one of these cases. #fdls
in this country, we have a constitutional right to a trial by our peers. while i am in no way defending the practice of child abuse and child marriage as a religious practice and hope this guy goes to jail for a long long long long time, the fact is that he still deserves a right to a trial by his peers. as wrong as it may seem to those of us outside of his world, his true peers include those who belong to his religious community and those who interact with and have a greater understanding of the complexities of the case than someone in NH (or even elsewhere in TX) ever could. the only time when moving a case is allowed, as far as i know, is when the jury is likely to be biased against the defendant, who after all is innocent until proven guilty.
that being said, i hope these guys get whats coming to them, because they disgust me. #fdls
@ellesbelles: A jury of peers has never been interpreted to mean the jury needs to share the same religious beliefs or come from the same culture. I have twice sat on a jury and I doubt either defendant would have called me or most of the jurors peers. But we understood the complexities of the case. Even when I disagreed with my fellow jurors, I appreciated that they were being impartial and trying to apply the law as the judge directed us.
Perhaps we are not providing what our founders expected in the constitution, but considering they had no problem trying women and blacks in front of juries made completely of white men, I doubt they would complain. #fdls
@ellesbelles: As opposed to a jury that shares their belief in marrying off girl children to old men? They won't get what is coming to them in that situation - and THAT is the point. #fdls
@ellesbelles: Your peers are people drawn from the area, not people who believe the same things that you do. You don't seem to understand the right that you're claiming is being violated. #fdls
I'm always surprised by the weirdness that FLDS engenders -- reading the article, the specific charge involves a 16-year-old who was in labor for DAYS but they wouldn't take her to the hospital for fear of drawing attention to their marriage practices. Jesus Christ on a cracker. #fdls
The moralist in me is totally behind this. The anthropologist in me is very conflicted, mostly in regards to the polygamy charges.
If it is financially viable and all parties are amenable, I don't see the point of making polygamy (as encompassing both polygyny and polyandry) illegal. #fdls
@lalie (apologetic mess): But are all parties amenable if, in order to maintain the required male to female ratio for polygamy, they expel male teenagers and young men? #fdls
@Lymed: you haven't defined polygamy, you've described the culture that often surrounds polygamy.
I think by legalizing polygamy and encouraging people to get marriage licenses from the country/state, you could eliminate some of the problems because there's a way to track these relationships and determine who is responsible for whom.
Marriage in a legal context isn't about sex, its about determining who has what rights and responsibilities towards another. People can have polyamourous relationships, but this isn't really what its about. #fdls
@pichou: I never claimed to have defined polygamy. I am replying to a coment lalie made about FDLS in which she said "if all parties are amenable." I am questioning whether, in this instance, all parties are amenable because FDLS expels young men and teenage males. #fdls
@Lymed: That's a good point. I would agree that complicates things; I didn't actually know that about FDLS.
But then, wouldn't polygamy as a whole being illegal make it so that issue is somewhat ignored? It's just, "oh, that's an illegal type of marriage," and not, "this woman was not given another choice". #fdls
@Lymed: not only that, but if your husband pisses off the leader, you and your kids can be re-assigned to a man of his choosing, while your husband is expelled from the compound. that's right - even as an adult, you don't have a choice.
I know "Big Love" makes it seem like polygamists are basically standard-issue, suburban Relief Society ladies with interesting personal lives, but the majority of cases (like the FLDS in Hilldale/Colorado City) are more like Nikki's family on the compound.
Not that there aren't consenting adults making it work in the suburbs like the Henricksons, but that's not what we're dealing with most of the time. #fdls
@Lymed: Lalie wasn't saying that polygamy should be allowed specifically for FDLS, but rather that polygamy should be allowed in general provided all parties are amenable.
You can have amenable parties even if young men are expelled from the community.
Unfortunately, I think you're right in that these practices limit choice and in many cases amount to coercision. #fdls
This trial should be moved out of the county - preferably out of the state. In fact, they should have it here in NH. I guarantee a far different outcome in this part of the country. #fdls
@PaintedTrollop: NH is cool with child molestation? I get that certain people might be more open-minded about unusual beliefs or more willing to live-and-let-live, but I'd hope most people of any moral, religious, or political persuasion would draw the line at adults raping children. #fdls
@small-fox: I'm guessing it's the opposite: the article says several members of the jury pool were clearly part of the FLDS church. Whereas, in New Hampshire, there are relatively few of those. I grew up there; trust me, a lot of people would like to bring back the stocks for child molesters, at the very least. #fdls
@PaintedTrollop: I'm all for moving it to a different part of the state, just because of the jury pool. But, I can guarantee you that Texas prosecutes the shit out of child molesters. We'd have hog tied Roman Polanski and dragged him across the Atlantic by now.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: But is there not an argument for saying that people should be judged by members of their own community/society? After all, I wouldn't like to have a jury at my trial (for whatever crime I plan to commit!) that was from a society with a different culture and moral outlook from mine (say, an orthodox Catholic background, which might consider my actions criminal if they related to homosexuality) because we simply might not have the same moral codes.
I know that New Hampshire and Texas are the same nation politically speaking, but there are obviously other rules governing the limits and borders of different social and communital behaviours than the national borders on a map. This raises much bigger issues regarding the ability of a generalised notion of national values to have any realistic arbitration over, or relation to, a body of people who belong to diverse communities.
I'm just paying devil's advocate... according to MY moral codes, these allegations, if true, are abhorrant. #fdls
@clochette: What if all members of your community are suspected of committing the same crime or of having helped to perpetuate the crime or similar crimes? #fdls
@CurtCole: Texas either signed a law or tried to sign a law mandating the death penalty for repeat child molesters. It was all a big horse and pony show, mostly, since that likely wouldn't stand up in court, but they tried it. So you're right that Texas takes pride in hanging em high. My dad cheered when Karla Faye Tucker got executed. The college in Huntsville (where they execute prisoners) has a big syringe as its mascot.
I may be making one of those things up, but yes, the Lone Star State prides itself on being "tough on crime." As well as tough on those whoring teenagers who don't listen when their health teacher tells them not to have sex before marriage. #fdls
10/26/09
The men in positions of power (there are no women who hold the priesthood) bare more than religious swords over their followers heads. They control the economic, emotional, and social power from birth until death. This is a system of abuse from start to finish.
Jessop is part of that system and indeed, a family, of patriarchs that practice extreme control over others, and will not hesitate to inflict violence and death for subversion (blood atonement). Whether or not he is guilty of this particular charge or set of charges, the pattern is clear, and traceable for about 100 years, with escalation in the past 30 or so. I hope he, and the others, are convicted and that it brings a spotlight bright as the sun upon the 'Yearning for Zion' compound and other FLDS strongholds.
I wish I wasn't so angry about this. I've lived my life in the two states most accepting of FLDS practices, and I'm infuriated that these state governments do nothing but turn a blind eye to what is happening. I understand that they go after charges they think they can win, but it still really gets me riled up. Clearly I'll never sit on a jury in one of these cases. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
that being said, i hope these guys get whats coming to them, because they disgust me. #fdls
10/26/09
Perhaps we are not providing what our founders expected in the constitution, but considering they had no problem trying women and blacks in front of juries made completely of white men, I doubt they would complain. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
If it is financially viable and all parties are amenable, I don't see the point of making polygamy (as encompassing both polygyny and polyandry) illegal. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
I think by legalizing polygamy and encouraging people to get marriage licenses from the country/state, you could eliminate some of the problems because there's a way to track these relationships and determine who is responsible for whom.
Marriage in a legal context isn't about sex, its about determining who has what rights and responsibilities towards another. People can have polyamourous relationships, but this isn't really what its about. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
But then, wouldn't polygamy as a whole being illegal make it so that issue is somewhat ignored? It's just, "oh, that's an illegal type of marriage," and not, "this woman was not given another choice". #fdls
10/26/09
I know "Big Love" makes it seem like polygamists are basically standard-issue, suburban Relief Society ladies with interesting personal lives, but the majority of cases (like the FLDS in Hilldale/Colorado City) are more like Nikki's family on the compound.
Not that there aren't consenting adults making it work in the suburbs like the Henricksons, but that's not what we're dealing with most of the time. #fdls
10/27/09
You can have amenable parties even if young men are expelled from the community.
Unfortunately, I think you're right in that these practices limit choice and in many cases amount to coercision. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
I know that New Hampshire and Texas are the same nation politically speaking, but there are obviously other rules governing the limits and borders of different social and communital behaviours than the national borders on a map. This raises much bigger issues regarding the ability of a generalised notion of national values to have any realistic arbitration over, or relation to, a body of people who belong to diverse communities.
I'm just paying devil's advocate... according to MY moral codes, these allegations, if true, are abhorrant. #fdls
10/26/09
10/26/09
I may be making one of those things up, but yes, the Lone Star State prides itself on being "tough on crime." As well as tough on those whoring teenagers who don't listen when their health teacher tells them not to have sex before marriage. #fdls
10/26/09