@TexasCrude blames Gwyneth Paltrow: Ah, a woman after my own heart. Except I'm broke BECAUSE I went to college. I'm friends with the guy who delivers the overpriced stuff for the vending machines for my massive corporation. Free Reese's Pieces. I save them for dinner!
There seems to be a massive disconnect between what we've seen of the magazine thus far, and this horribly unflattering portrait of its editor. Which leads me to believe that her "high pitched squeak" was emphasized on purpose. Understandable, because the NY Times already has an edgy, high quality, fashion magazine... oh, wait.
Sadie, I think you touched on something that is VERY accurate about NYT life and/or style writing in general:
To a degree, the disconnect between the (Silly, Expensive Thing)and (OTHER Silly, Expensive Thing) probably doesn't seem as manifest to them as to the casual reader.
This is pretty much it right there. Ever want to sound weirdly entitled and tone-deaf when writing about life or fashion? Pretend you can't fathom the relationships between things! It is working fine for Paltrow!
@tscheese: (And by this I mean, I'm talking about the NYT's style, not Katie Grand. I haven't read anything by her yet, but she sounds interesting. I wasn't trying to make her sound like Paltrow.)
Meanwhile TexasCrude inherited five bucks from her mom the other day, wears an old pair of pants daily and hangs with such prestigious folk like the homeless guy by the minimart, the bus driver, that math professor she badly wants to bone and the librarian. She constantly indulges in being broke and not being able to go to college!
Ah, a woman after my own heart. Except I'm broke BECAUSE I went to college. I'm friends with the guy who delivers the overpriced stuff for the vending machines for my massive corporation. Free Reese's Pieces. I save them for dinner!
@Samazon: I have viewpoints about that cover that I have refrained from discussing. I think it's a bit complicated and can't really be nailed down to any one thing. But, I think most people interpreted it as celebratory.
Let's see how many more "divergent" types of beauty they will show on the cover. They didn't have many POC in the mag.
@Penny Plastic: Haha, oh now I'm curious about the viewpoints you have refrained from discussing. I will say obesity-related illness has been a problem for my mother, and I am eager to avoid that, but in general I really like learning about the fat-acceptance movement and love Kate Harding. But I still liked the Ditto cover because the reality is that fear about health issues should not make a certain body type less beautiful than others. I don't know that celebrating Ditto's beauty should be "outrageous performance art" though, if that really is how we should read Grand's statement.
Mostly I am excited for this magazine because every time I pick up Nylon I want to throw it out the window, and Vogue is too fancy for me. So, I can't wait to see what this will be like!
@goldengirl11 (is way too earnest): They have nothing to do with her health or whether an overweight woman can be considered beautiful, so no worries there.
If anything, it just seem gimmicky - like they are trying to transgress, but not overly so. I am also bothered by the dichotomies that develop around female beauty, and I think that showing someone different, while somewhat commendable, is not as amazing as some people make it out to be.
@Penny Plastic: Ah interesting. Sorry I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, my Mom has just gone through a lot with her health, and sometimes I am a little conflicted about the way weight and health are discussed here.
But I agree, the very fact that it seems like Grand views Ditto's cover as cutting-edge is depressing. The point of a cover model should be beauty, fashion and accomplishments (sounds like a pageant!) and Ditto has all those, that should be why she's on the cover.
@JanicefromSA: I'm sincerely hoping that by "stuffed guinea pig," they mean a plush toy and not that this woman keeps pieces of taxidermy on the couch.
@Linnley: exactly. I wonder if she might be too dry for the writer of the New York Times, ie if the comments weren't that serious but the writer missed the point? It's the only explanation I can come up with.
It's interesting because that profile makes me dislike Katie Grand and yet in every other piece I read with her she comes across as down-to-earth, witty and interesting. I recommend looking at her interview with the Guardian for a better view.
There are a variety of ways in Michelle Obama is completely awesome and there are a disproportionate number of articles focusing on this one single aspect. I'm more concerned with the new administration than how much emotional impact she's gonna have on high fashion designers.
"To put it bluntly, Michelle Obama makes fashion feel bad about itself." I think they just haven't figured out how to use it to benefit themselves yet. I know that's a crass angle to take, but I think they are following Billy Crystal's lead: "It's better to look good than to feel good, dahling."
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
To a degree, the disconnect between the (Silly, Expensive Thing)and (OTHER Silly, Expensive Thing) probably doesn't seem as manifest to them as to the casual reader.
This is pretty much it right there. Ever want to sound weirdly entitled and tone-deaf when writing about life or fashion? Pretend you can't fathom the relationships between things! It is working fine for Paltrow!
02/23/09
02/23/09
Tres chic!
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
Let's see how many more "divergent" types of beauty they will show on the cover. They didn't have many POC in the mag.
02/23/09
Mostly I am excited for this magazine because every time I pick up Nylon I want to throw it out the window, and Vogue is too fancy for me. So, I can't wait to see what this will be like!
02/23/09
If anything, it just seem gimmicky - like they are trying to transgress, but not overly so. I am also bothered by the dichotomies that develop around female beauty, and I think that showing someone different, while somewhat commendable, is not as amazing as some people make it out to be.
Because, in the end, it IS easy to be edgy.
02/23/09
But I agree, the very fact that it seems like Grand views Ditto's cover as cutting-edge is depressing. The point of a cover model should be beauty, fashion and accomplishments (sounds like a pageant!) and Ditto has all those, that should be why she's on the cover.
02/23/09
This is true. Which is why it's relatively easy to creatively direct a fashion magazine.
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
01/26/09
Okay, raise your hand if you're enjoying that an awful lot.
*raises hand*
01/26/09
01/26/09
"To put it bluntly, Michelle Obama makes fashion feel bad about itself." I think they just haven't figured out how to use it to benefit themselves yet. I know that's a crass angle to take, but I think they are following Billy Crystal's lead: "It's better to look good than to feel good, dahling."
01/26/09
I'm not concerned about the self-esteem of people who've devoted their lives to tracking hemlines and hairdos. The haters can suck it.