<![CDATA[Jezebel: Fashion Victims]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: Fashion Victims]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/fashion victims http://jezebel.com/tag/fashion victims <![CDATA[ "I don't believe in fashion faux pas. Every ... ]]> christinaaguilera43008.jpg"I don't believe in fashion faux pas. Every look I did was important at the time. When I was in the Lady Marmalade video it was all about being over the top, sexy and playful... Would I do that today? Probably not. It was a different time, a different place for me... I've had so many wardrobe malfunctions on stage. One time I was doing a dance move and I had to get off a table. Somehow my high heel got stuck in my fishnet tights and I fell flat on the floor. I sat there, with a bruised butt and a tear in my pantyhose...Being objectified in magazines comes with the territory." That's X-Tina Aguilera, folks, in the Times of London's weekly "My Life In Fashion" column. [Times of London]

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:20:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385654&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There Are Five Types Of "Extreme Shoppers," And They're All Horrifying ]]> parisshops042908.jpgToday's Women's Wear Daily bemoans the five types of dysfunctional "extreme shoppers." These women live where conspicuous consumption and pathology meet. You know them, surely — or, at least, you've seen them: They demand attention. They cry in the dressing room. They cry outside of the dressing room. They cry outside of the dressing room while still undressed. They attempt to get poor unsuspecting sales clerks naked in a dressing room with them. Thing is, has anyone ever met one of these types? Will anyone admit to being one? After the jump, the categories of terror.





The Five Types of Extreme Shoppers

  1. Miss Lonely Hearts: "Well-practiced at pouring her heart out to a salesperson on a regular basis."
    In brief, these ladies are really rich... Off of their husband's money. They don't work. Spending aforementioned husband's money is their main occupation. Also, these women are getting increasingly younger and younger. This "type" also includes, however, the mid-divorce-wife who is trying to drive up her spending habits to get more in the settlement. Consider these your executive nut jobs, to paraphrase Eddie Izzard. No fucking around with these ladies.


  2. The Addict: "Shops nonstop, and isn't exactly sure why."
    If a customer makes her first phone call from the plastic surgeon's recovery room to her favorite sales clerk, asking him to send over the latest looks for her new body (true story!), she's an addict.


  3. The Psycho Shopper: "Prone to tantrums and just plain bizarre behavior. One such shopper had a Bergdorf Goodman staffer snap naked photos of her in the dressing room."
    Known for exhibiting "register rage," turning a dressing room into her satellite office, and saying things like, "My husband is jealous of these boots because they are better looking than he is. He hasn't spoken to me in a week because he thinks I am paying more attention to my boots than to him."


  4. The Performer-Exhibitionist:"Inclined to parade around the store in her underwear, flirt with salespeople or show off her latest dance move or bauble."
    Based on WWD's reporting, these women are really into yoga. They might start performing poses at the register. Or, they might begin their practice in the middle of the sales floor wearing "only a thong." Says one poor salesman, "I can't tell you how many naked women I have seen. It's a safe perversion for them. They know I'm gay but they love the idea of a man looking at them naked. They have me lift a boob, adjust a bra or snap a bodysuit. Ick."


  5. Little Ms. Indecisive: "Tries on clothes as a form of exercise, is a big fan of putting merchandise on hold for days before actually buying and often is a chronic returner."
    Apparently, these customers are "in mourning." Because they're probably already deeply in debt. Fun!

Shoppers In Need Of A Little In-Store Psychology [WWD, sub req'd]

]]>
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385241&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Vera Wang the next Martha Stewart? Wang ... ]]> verawang42508.jpgIs Vera Wang the next Martha Stewart? Wang has just announced the launch of her own bridal registry. "Our authoritative position in bridal and bridal registry has allowed us to leverage this [consumer] trust into a lifestyle brand. The next logical step is to capitalize on our relationship with the client over the course of their lives. Our objective is to continue to grow our lifestyle product offering and keep pace with the evolving needs of the consumer," she says. Translation: She's gonna slap her name on furniture, fabrics, rugs, lighting and house paint and watch the brides go bonkers. [BrandWeek]

]]>
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ In today's Times of London, Keith Richards, ... ]]> keithrichardsforvuitton.pngIn today's Times of London, Keith Richards, for some inexplicable reason, is allowed to free-associate on, of all things, fashion. Behold: "Fashion thinks more about me than what I think about it. I just wore what I wore and people noticed. The sexiest thing a woman could wear? Being stark f***ing naked....I don't do underwear. I never do the washing. How would I know whether my clothes stink? I throw them away....I can't say I'm bothered about the fate of the planet. I got a guitar case out of Louis Vuitton. They paid me a lot of money and it's all going to charity. I'm going to charity." [Times of London]

]]>
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383145&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fundamentalist Fashion: Not So Different Than High Design ]]> poygamistfashion42208.jpgThe question that keeps coming up again and again with regards to the Eldorado, Texas branch of the FLDS isn't "Where are all the men?" or even "Where's Sarah?" but rather, "Have you noticed what the women are wearing?" The media has even dubbed the phenomenon, somewhat crassly, "polygamist fashion", and the stories have multiplied in such a way that we figured we should take a look. What we learned is that there actually isn't anything that odd about the sect's sartorial choices — we've seen weirder on the runways of Gaultier. And speaking of high-minded fashion, a few designers (most notably Marc Jacobs) seem to have anticipated (or rather, copied) the FLDS aesthetic. After the jump, selected looks from various designers whose recent wares look most similar (in modest silhouette and tonal palette) to that of the FLDS females.





polygamistfash1.gif

L & C: Chris Benz SS08, R: Behnaz Sarafpour SS08


Benz's tone-on-tone palette and long, loose cuts were one of the most championed styles of the season. Behnaz Sarafpour uses the same 1950's shirtdress modelings as that of the FLDS uniforms.
polygamistfash2.gif

L & C: Behnaz Sarafpour SS08, R: Angel Chang SS08

In trenches and dresses alike, Sarafpour underscores the feminine by obscuring the body. Angel Chang's muted colors and conservative hem and necklines make modesty modern.
polygamistfash3.gif

L to R: Vera Wang SS08, Abaete SS08, Marc Jacobs FW08.

Vera Wang goes bold in rich jewel tone that is as shocking in its proportion as its shade. Abaete uses the shift and lightened earth tones to allow her model to all but disappear. Marc Jacobs' "Paul Revere" collection was a masterwork in the kind of color and proportion play found in the compound, repeated musings on one central concept.

[Images via Elle.com.]

Polygamists Make Their Own Fashion Statement [MSNBC]

]]>
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382771&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Nina Garcia's PR Company Using Interns To Promote Her Cause? ]]> ninagarcia041808.jpgThough neither Elle nor publisher Hachette Filipacchi nor Nina Garcia will confirm Garcia's having been "let go" from the magazine last week, WWD reports that Garcia hired Rubenstein PR to speak for her. And! A little birdie tells us that Rubenstein has handed off some of the Garcia damage control work to its interns, deploying legions of them to comment on sites like Perez Hilton and TMZ. The minions leave encouraging and kind remarks, complete with stats on Nina's many successes while at Elle in the comments. (Many examples here, here, and here.) Oh, and take a look at this comment from "MakeItWork", in response to Perez's post Elle Vs Nina Vs Project Runway:

ELLE: Jan-Mar '08 ['08 $] 71,832,955 ['07$] 64,793,223 [% change] 10.9 ['08 pgs] 583.55 ['07 pgs] 552.00 [% change] 5.7

The team at Elle is doing something right, if PIB figures are a tell (see previous post 'It's not just newspapers.') And I suspect circulation figures, especially newsstand, were also strong for the same period, which coincides with the end of the last PR cycle.

Not all the work is done in the office especially in high profile positions at a fashion magazine. What seems like a glam lifestyle to many — designer dinners, fashion shows, gala functions — is considered work and has value. Also let's not forget, during the '2 years' cited by the 'insider' (read, one who likely wished their job was to get out to attend the aforementioned) Nina had a baby. Motherhood is very important work, isn't it?

It's doubtful, however, that Rubenstein's interns are responsible for the following comment, left in the same thread:
I actually heard when I worked there, that Nina had slept with Joe Zee not Gilles... wait, wait now I remember... They said Joe Zee loved having trio's [sic] with Nina and Robbie Myers IN THE CLOSET! yes!...and that they walked out with their hands full! Did you spread that stuff you said she did on your fucking tongue or what you bitch! You really hate and envy Nina right?...is it that you are in LOVE with Nina and truth is her popularity kills you!
Yeah, that one doesn't quite scream "public relations professional," does it?


Earlier: Elle Continues To Toy With Nina Garcia's Affections

]]>
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381278&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Aliza Shvarts: The Halloween How-To For Harvard Students ]]> alizashvarts41808.jpgAliza Shvarts '08 is more than just an alleged abortion-inducer; according to our commenters, she is also a style icon of sorts. In fact, we predict that come Halloween, students all over Cambridge and other rival Ivies will be dressing up as the suddenly-notorious art student from that other East Coast institution of higher learning. In order to help them along, we decided to create a handy guide to recreating Aliza's look... Black leggings? Check! Fringe boots? Check! Leopard-print shorts? Of course. Everything they need to create a Shvarts costume (except for the discarded uterine lining), after the jump.









The foundation of Aliza's outfit is, naturally, built upon the shopping mecca of aspiring hipster poseurs everywhere: American Apparel. Below, the leggings, scoop-neck leotard and black hoody.
alizaamericaapparel.gif

(Unisex flex fleece zip hoody, $40; cotton spandex jersey legging, $26; jersey short sleeve t-shirt leotard, $28.)



And her boots? White fringe stylings are something that could only be found at a place called the Boot Barn.
alizabootsreal.jpg

(Oak Tree Farm "Oasis" fringe boot, $89.99)



And don't forget the hair! This Beverly Johnson wig in Shade 4 ought to do the trick.
alizawig.jpg

(H-214 by Beverly Johnson wig, $45.90)



But to really encapsulate Aliza-style, you've gotta rock the baggy leopard-print short. Where to go? The men's underwear section of WildFree, naturally.
alizaleopardshorts.jpg

(Wild Free men's lingerie silk leopard-print boxer shorts, $24)



Related: Shvarts Explains Her 'Repeated Self-Induced Miscarriages [Yale Daily News]

]]>
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381470&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Marc Jacobs Isn't Crazy -- He Just Has <i>Issues</i> ]]> marcjacobsgq041608.jpg
"Why is there this division all of a sudden between people in support of me and people against me? How did this happen? I haven't done anything to anybody! I look at Karl Lagerfeld and John Galliano—everybody has their shtick. And just because this wasn't my shtick two years ago, it's a problem."
Marc Jacobs is upset. He is also really buff, debatably character-disordered, and, at present, unusually sober. He's practically a psychological case study: A lost little boy with an aching, damaged soul, living in the public eye. (With diamond studs in his ears, to boot.) At least, that's the angle Marie Claire executive editor Lucy Kaylin takes, as she profiles America's Most Important Fashion Designer in this month's issue of GQ.

There are few remaining champions of Mark Jacobs. Affection for him has eroded over the past year in particular, as he has emerged as a gym-and-Sponge Bob Square pants-and-Victoria Beckham-obsessed mean girl, someone who lets the masses wait ages for his fashion shows to start, only to stick his tongue out at them from his own turn on the catwalk afterwards. This is not the fat and greasy Jacobs that garnered notoriety and respect for showing "couture grunge" for Perry Ellis over fifteen years ago. And I suspect that Kaylin, who wrote of her inalienable right to employ a nanny in her recently-published book the The Perfect Stranger, doesn't have much sympathy for a man who openly hates his mother. (In her book, Kaylin was very insistent about how much her children must love her despite (in spite?) of her choices. Jacobs probably made her uncomfortable.) When he was seven years old, Jacobs's father died from ulcerative colitis (a condition he also has), and then watched his mother take off on, as Kaylin puts it, "a chaotic period of power dating and failed marriages." This underscored the young Jacobs's belief that his mother was, inherently, a person who made poor choices:

I hate the term 'bad taste,' but my mother wasn't, like, a very chic person. Jane Fonda in Klute was definitely one of her role models, much to my father's dismay. But when I'd watch my mother getting dressed up to go out on dates and she'd be putting on three rows of false eyelashes and some hideous fox-trimmed brocade coat with a wet-look miniskirt and knee-high boots...
And then something happened in high school. Jacobs won't talk about what it is, but it caused him to cease all communication with his mother, brother and sister from that point forward. And how does Jacobs see himself in this, all these years later?
Utterly cold on the subject. I never believed that idea that you're supposed to love the members of your family. I hate the idea of obliged feelings—I just think that's a huge waste of time. But I've had enough conversations with people to realize that I'm the oddball in this category. I can't think of anyone as detached from their family as I am. Or as detached as I say I am.
In a way, his newfound obsession with fitness and dieting make sense: Of course someone who feels that there are no guarantees in life and who suffers from an uncomfortable medical condition that led to a loved one's death is going to ultimately seek solace in focusing entirely on the self. If no one else is going to love you, you'd damn well better love yourself. So Marc creates a body he can see the attraction to. But that's my 2¢. Marc says:
Exercising is fun — the best part of my day. I'm such a catastrophic thinker that when anything happens, I figure I better just live life to the fullest — buy a diamond necklace, get another tattoo, work out... Whatever makes me feel good, I want more of. If work is going well, I want to do more clothes. If the gym thing is working for me, I want to be bigger. If getting my hair cut makes me look younger, I want to play with the color.... 'I want to look hot.' That is such a dumb thing to say. But what's so cool about it is that you can say it. Yeah, I want a bunch of muscle queens at David Barton Gym to think that my body looks dope. And I might think that was an awkward and dumb thing to say, but I still like that I'll throw it out there. Because it's true, you know?
Of whether his ever-growing collection of tattoos will be weird when he gets old he says, "I don't know if I'm even going to get to be 80. And who would want to see me at 80, anyway?"

Well. some of us would. Let's hope he stays sober and healthy. I'll bet there are still many creative tricks up his fashionable, neurotic sleeve.

Marc Jacobs Doesn't Give A F___ [GQ]

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380304&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Naomi Campbell is boycotting British Airways ... ]]> naomicampbell1121.jpgNaomi Campbell is boycotting British Airways and Heathrow Airport's Terminal 5 after having been arrested there for getting physical a few weeks ago. Call us crazy, but we're not sure how you boycott an airline that already declared you unwelcome on any of its flights ever again. [Times of London]

]]>
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380530&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Feminist Thinks Women Should Boycott Marc Jacobs ]]> MARCJACBOS041008.jpgThe "Fashion & Style" section of Today's New York Times features a story about the Juergen Teller photographs Marc Jacobs uses for advertising purposes. The ads are unlike ordinary fashion ads because the photographs are raw, overexposed and kind of mysterious. Cathy Horyn writes, "Buying something from Marc Jacobs is like joining a club. Of course, that can be a turnoff to some people, but that would matter only if Mr. Jacobs sought a justification for the ads, one beyond their ability to inspire and provoke. And since some of the ads barely show the clothes, clearly he is not." Of the new ads starring Victoria Beckham, Horyn says "Instead of looking like a glamorous celebrity, she has been rendered as an abstraction, a living doll." Fun, right? Over on Feministing, Courtney E. Martin finds those ads severely troubling. In fact, she suggests that we all boycott Marc Jacobs.

"On the one hand, I'm almost relieved that Beckham is owning the fact that she's selling herself as a product," Martin explains. "It's what so many of today's vacuous celebrities are doing anyway." But:

On the other hand, it all makes me sick. We've moved beyond 'the male gaze" and objectification; now girls can grow up worshiping Victoria in her painfully tall stilettos and aspiring to be seen as a "living doll," an inhuman product. Beyond the classic advertising trope of cutting women into pieces, this ad campaign also seems to suck the real life right out of them. Please, please, please boycott Marc Jacobs.
So many of you will say, "I can't afford Marc Jacobs anyway." Not the point. The heart of this issue is the use of a woman as an object. Sure, Victoria Beckham objectifies herself — and admits to it — but is it detrimental to our gender? There was a time when women were actually treated like objects, like property to be transferred; like a doll to be dressed up and adored — but meant to be beautiful and silent, passive and a being whose intellect and emotions were irrelevant. Have we come far enough that it's fun and fashionable to treat a woman like an inanimate object? If there was a photo of woman in a bag with only her legs sticking out on the cover of Playboy or Maxim, would we think it sexist? (Think about that famous 1978 Hustler cover.) Do we forgive Juergen Teller, Marc Jacobs and Posh Spice for this ad because it's "cool"?

marcjacobshustler041008.jpg

When Is a Fashion Ad Not a Fashion Ad? [NY Times]
Beyond Objectification: Woman as Product [Feministing]

]]>
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378387&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Star Power Is Not (Yet) Enough To Make Liz Claiborne Stylish ]]> timgunn040308.jpgDoes anyone buy Liz Claiborne? In December 2006, following years of financial troubles, the company brought on William McComb, a swaggering CEO who knew nothing about the fashion industry but soon realized that a little makeover out of the pages of Management 101 were not going to be enough to revive the struggling brand. McComb's secret weapon, of course, was Project Runway's Tim Gunn, whom he hired as the brand's chief creative officer in March 2007. As the April issue of Fast Company reports, McComb loved Gunn's work in both reality TV and in academia and figured that if Gunn could salvage a paralyzed fashion design program and help create a hit show, surely he could figure out how to make women buy basics from Liz Claiborne again. Or not!

Just this past February, the company's stock fell 18% in a day, proving that Gunn's name was not enough to translate into action at the cash register. Even Gunn's attempts to up the company's fame factor — Isaac Mizrahi was hired to be creative director of the Claiborne womenswear line and John Bartlett hired to oversee menswear soon afterwards — haven't helped. (Sure, the day Mizrahi's new role at the company was announced the company's stock was up 25%, but "much of that evaporated within a few weeks.") It remains unclear on how this acquisition, helmed by Gunn, has done anything to get Claiborne out of the red and into the realm wildly popular. Says Gunn: "I honestly think that in the not-too-distant future, this company will establish new paradigms of operations, the likes of which I don't think this industry has ever seen. I think we're going to be a Harvard Business School case study." Sorry, Tim: I'm a major fan, and I know that your new starpower designers' stuff won't be seen until next spring, but I remain unsold on your products and verbiage, both.

Project Rehab [Fast Money]

Earlier: How Tim Gunn Is Connected To J. Edgar Hoover, And Other Surprises About Project Runway's Favorite Father-Hen

]]>
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375970&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fug Footwear: A Step In The Wrong Direction ]]> pradashoe.png"What do you think of these?" I asked my boyfriend, showing him an image of the It Shoes of the season, the Prada sandal platforms that, according to a story on hideous heels in today's New York Observer, look "like the work of someone on acid, or at least weed". "I dunno," replied boyfriend. "Guys don't notice shoes." Women, however, do, which is why it is so very odd that this season's most-talked about accessories are the ugliest expensive shit you ever saw. So why are women shelling out the big bucks for things that might turn you to stone for looking at them, if you don't break your back walking in them? Are ugly and overpriced shoes the latest ploy by retailers to create a wealthy elite?

Let's face it. If you are a normal person, you do not have close to $800 to spend on a pair of shoes. And even if you did, you would probably be spending it on something you could wear over and over again, or, hell, something you could wear at all. (Forget "if you have to ask you can't afford it", this is "if you have to be mobile you can't afford it.")

"I feel horrible when my girls come in here and say, 'I can't spend this much on sandals,' " says one boutique owner, who spoke with the Los Angeles Times regarding the rising price of ridiculous shoes. "They think it's my fault, but I am paying these high prices too." Another LA boutique owner agrees. "When Chloé came on the scene, I remember noticing it. All of a sudden, every line started designing a shoe collection that was more elaborate and more expensive."

Why do women do it? Bankrupting themselves, making their tootsies uglier and forcing pain upon themselves for some perverse pleasure gotten from owning something so impractical, so debilitating, and so (we repeat) fug? Let us not forget the sagacious words of our favorite paper, London's Daily Mail, which explains the allure of high heels thusly: "Men like an exaggerated female figure." Yeah, my boyfriend who insists men aren't looking at my feet? Apparently he's right.

Whatsa Matter With Choo? [NY Observer]
Manolo Lovers Feel Financial Pain At the Pump [LA Times]
Life's Little Mysteries [Daily Mail]

[Image via Style.com]

]]>
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375294&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Women Who Love Fashion Are Not Inherently Idiotic ]]> westwoodfashion032508.jpg"Quick," writes Jessa Crispin on TheSmartSet.com. "How do you tell if a woman in a movie is supposed to be intelligent? First off, she'd probably be brunette, but past that. Glasses, yes. Little to no makeup. Her hair is probably in a ponytail. Clothes she probably bought at the Gap in a size too big. You know she's the smart one because she thinks about more important things than her appearance." We live in a world where "trendy" girls with "it" bags are often vapid, shallow beings bereft of a brain. The fashion magazine industry often makes things worse: "Elle talks to Ashlee Simpson. And writes down what she says. To be recorded for all time," Crispin notes. And "there is a huge disconnect between the fantasy world of Vogue — where women spend their days romping in fields wearing $1,500 sequined leggings — and reality." And yet there are women who are smart and care about fashion. Right? Right?

Hadley Freeman thinks so. She's the author of The Meaning Of Sunglasses. And, according to Crispin, she "namedrops Andrea Dworkin and poet Joseph Parisi as often as she does Anna Wintour. She's the one you want on the other side of the changing room... If you came out looking cheap, she would grab you by the shoulders, turn you around, and demand you change immediately. As she writes in the section labeled 'Cleavage, and the plumbing of depths,' 'Show me a woman with a good three inches of cleavage on display, and I'll show you a woman who, rightly or wrongly, has little faith in her powers of conversation.'"

Here's the thing: If you're smart enough to realize that fashion is a cultural construct rooted in sexist ideals and designed to divide women from their dollars, are you not allowed to admit that you sorta like a Gucci purse? If you have the intellectual capacity to understand that if all mankind wore some kind of uniform, like monks' robes, the globe would be alleviated of many problems — from sweatshops to bullying — should you feel guilty about liking the Jovovich-Hawk collection for Target?

"Freeman wrote a book for women who actually exist," Crispin writes. "Women who have to wait for buses in the middle of winter. Women who like to dance at parties, and do not want to have to sit in the corner because their feet are bleeding." Fashion is not just for Vogue and Karl Lagerfeld. It's self-expression, it's loving to get dressed, to get dressed up; it's realizing that your clothes can reflect your thoughts, your mood, your passions. And if someone's passionate about clothes, isn't labeling them shallow sort of superficial?

Feminists Want To Look Good Too [Utne]
How To Shop [The Smart Set]

]]>
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ What Do You Think People Will Be Wearing In 70 Years? ]]>
Back in the 1930s, some fashion designers were asked about what they thought people would be wearing in the year 2000. And, uh, weirdly — they really hit the nail on the head about most everything from platform shoes to sheer dresses. If only our clothes responded to our body temperature, though. Sigh. Video of these predictions begins above.

Flashback: '30s Fashion Predictions for the Year 2000 [GiggleSugar]

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:40:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370330&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Formerly Punk & Currently Quirky Vivienne Westwood: "Why Don't People Tear Their Own Clothes?" ]]> viviennewestwood0314.jpgYou've gotta love Vivienne Westwood. The 66-year-old British fashion designer is sorta insane, but she sorta knows it, so it's all good. She hates expensive shit, yet continues to sell it (a girl's gotta eat?) and is basically single-handedly credited with creating punk. When Sabine Durrant of the Telegraph interviewed Westwood recently, Viv informed her: "I can't think without my glasses." Glad to see someone else suffers the same problem! Everything that trickles out of her mouth is somehow amazing and perversely awe-inspiring. She's kind of a big dork: "Every time I have to look up a word in the dictionary I'm delighted." And of her early days as a pre-school teacher, she says:"My sympathies were with the kids. I could understand why they were naughty." And wait until you hear what she says about punk now:

Why don't people tear their own clothes if that's what they want? Why buy a torn T-shirt from me? ...If you hear Anarchy In The UK today your hair stands on end. It gives you the shivers... I moved on. I realised that it's only ideas that are subversive in the end. It's not rushing around being a rebel.
On her children and how she raised them:
I never tried to impose things. And I felt my sons should respect me. It would have to be a real emergency, for example, if they would wake me in the middle of the night, or even early in the morning. But I always thought what I could give to my children were my opinions. I don't think I was very good at educating my children... Oh, maybe I was in a way. My eldest son [a porn photographer] reads... And my younger son... Well, until a year ago he had only read The Great Train Robbery and a history of Jimmy somebody or other... But then he's Malcolm's son as well, so...
On ex-husband, Sex Pistols manager Malcolm McLaren:
I do all these shows in Paris [where he lives] but I don't think of inviting him even. I think he's been too bad to me. Finally I decided he wasn't worth seeing. Sorry, I shouldn't say it in that way, but I don't expect he'll mind.
On current husband Andreas Kronthaler, who is both bisexual and 25 years younger than Westwood:
He needs my calmness and my grounding because he's very hysterical. He gets overwhelmed by himself. [...] I've never been interested - I've never worried - what he's up to or anything. I let him go - not let him, I mean he goes - on holiday by himself. And he'll change his clothes two or three times a day, even on the beach. And that man - he has to change his underwear. He has to feel things. He's a very sensual person.
On her 10-year old granddaughter, Cora:
She's really conservative. I'm very disappointed in that. She wears jeans. I think jeans are terrible... She said to me, "It's more important if people are nice people than what they wear." I said, "Rubbish."

Viva Viv [Telegraph]

]]>
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368031&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CFDA 2008: Will Marc Jacobs' Bad Behavior Be Rewarded? ]]> marc1008.jpgThe Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) just announced the nominees for its annual awards (think: the Oscars of the fashion industry), and, as reported earlier, Marc Jacobs nabbed a prestigious Womenswear Designer of the Year nod. But considering the fact that his peers spent the past year harping on him and that every critic under the sun (except the ever-adoring Cathy Horyn) said that his Spring/Summer 2008 collection sucked big time, the nomination seemed a little shocking. Still, he'll probably win: After all, he's probably the American designer with the most name recognition and ability to parlay his branded name into dollar signs. After the jump, I compare Jacobs to the other nominees, including those for the Swarovski Womenswear Designer of the Year (given to a rising designer with the most promise), complete with pretty photos, and a tiny bit of backstory on each.

Womenswear Designer of the Year: cfdamarc2008.gifDesigner: Marc Jacobs Known for: Running late, reviving punk, loving Victoria Beckham and Sponge Bob SquarePants, equally Seen on: Posh, natch. Also: Winona Ryder, Courtney Love, M.I.A., and every starlet under the sun Odds of winning: 2:3 (I mean, the guy had a nervous breakdown and put out two radically different collections this year. Plus, he got CFDA prez Diane von Furstenberg to say that she would chain herself to a grate before she let him show in Paris)

cfdacalvin2008.gifDesigner: Francisco Costa for Calvin Klein Known for: Keeping it simple, being a nice guy Seen on: Ashley Olsen, Kate Bosworth, ELLE editor-in-chief Roberta Myers Odds of winning: 1:3 (Won in 2006 — doesn't really need to win again)

cfdaproenza2008.gifDesigner: Lazaro Hernandez and Jack McCollough for Proenza Schouler. Known for: Intricate bustier dresses, being style chameleons, being child prodigies Seen on: Amy Adams, Isla Fisher Odds of winning: 1:3 (Won last year, but tied with Oscar de la Renta. Is this their year to not share the spotlight?)

Swarovski Womenswear Designer of the Year: cfdarodarte2008.gifDesigner: Kate & Laura Mulleavy for Rodarte Known for: Gauze-strewn punk fairy dresses; being "intellectual" Seen on: Natalie Portman Odds of winning: 1:3 (Might be too intellectual and not practical enough for the fickle fashion world.)

cfdathakoon2008.gifDesigner: Thakoon Panichgul Known for: Wares that resemble the love-child of a hippie and a minimalist Seen on: Top fashion editors, young fashion assistants who blow an entire fiscal quarter's pay on one piece Odds of winning: 2:3 (The vet of the young designer set. He'll probably be rewarded for his good behavior)

cfdaalexanderwang2008.gifDesigner: Alexander Wang Known for: Being a punk rock outlaw Seen on: 15-year old Estonian models Odds of winning: 1:3 (The young whippersnapper just got into the game — they're going to make him work for a statuette)

[Photos via AP, Getty, and ELLE.com]

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366446&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ If You Worked At Home, You'd Be Wearing Pajamas Too ]]> annehathaway0213.jpgToday's Women's Wear Daily asks the legitimately thought-provoking question: Just who do women dress for? Now, since I work from home, I dress for no one, meaning I am regularly clad in orange sweats, an old tank top, thick wool socks, and my glasses. If I thought anyone could see me, however, I'd probably put on a pair of darkwash jeans, my favorite rose-colored low cut silk blouse and maybe the Marc Jacobs brown patent leather granny shoes I blew my last paycheck on. (Also, I would brush my hair.) Which, I guess, makes me like Anne Hathaway, who tells WWD (and not entirely originally) that "Most women dress for their most fashionable friend." But the other famous folk WWD spoke to were actually fairly split on whether women dress for other women... or for men.

Socialite Jamee Gregory says women dress for other women. ("Noted fashion photographer" Nigel Barker points out that "most men don't realize what's going on half the time. If their friend at work wears the same thing every day, they wouldn't notice. It's not in the gene pool.­­") But Ken Downing, the fashion director for Neiman Marcus, disagrees: "Women want to look sexy and stylish. They certainly want to dress for the man in their life and there's always a little competition with other women. That is the truth because I spend a lot of time around women and clothes." Adds designer Agatha Ruiz de la Prada: "In Spain, women dress for men...I think it's very tiring to have to dress to be sexy all day. It's horrible and exhausting to have to wear high heels for 24 hours."

And then there are those who say that women dress simply for themselves: "I don't know for everyone else. For me, it's for myself. When you feel good about yourself, you feel good about everyone else," says Carine Roitfeld of French Vogue. Echoes actress Sophia Bush: "I dress for myself. There are days when I don't want to be dressed up so I'm not. And there are other days when I really want to be done from head to toe. You've got to dress for you." And former Anne Klein designer Isabel Toledo points out that while she thinks that, on the whole, "Women dress for men. I do dress for myself because it makes me feel empowered, but I'm definitely looking for [husband] Rubin's expression, not his approval. I do use clothes to speak — how I dress is a form of communication for me."

Now I'd be hard-pressed to think of a time when I've been conscious of having put on a certain outfit hoping to attract the sexual interest of men, but I've definitely dressed hoping for the approval of other women. And while most days I don't dress myself thinking "I must win the love and acceptance of others!" I think it's sort of a bullshit to say you dress for yourself, always. Because in my case, no one can see what I'm wearing. (Those neon orange sweatpants). And I like to believe that Carine Roitfeld would be, too, if no one could see her. After all, if a fashionista falls in the forest and no one is around to see, is she really a fashionista?

All Dressed Up For No One In Particular [WWD]

]]>
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:00:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356058&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ And Then There Was Nothing: The Incredible Shrinking Male Model ]]> skinnymalemodels.pngAs I've been at fashion shows over the past week, I continue to be concerned about the size of the female models I've seen on the runway. They're very young and very, very thin and seeing these girls as they get poked and prodded backstage, in particular, makes me feel uncomfortable and worried for them. But apparently being worried about the weight of female models is one trend that's out; now the focus is on the men. The male mannequins, it seems, are also wasting away: on average, they are 6 feet tall and a paltry 145 lbs., a look that casting agent Patrick Scully attributes to the "Hedi Slimanization" of menswear. Says booking agent George Brown: "When I get that random phone call from a boy who says, 'I'm 6-foot-1 and I'm calling from Kansas,' I immediately ask, 'What do you weigh?' If they say 188 or 190, I know we can't use him."

Stranger, still, is who the fashion industry is blaming on this shift to skinny: Consumers themselves. Kelly Cutrone, head of PR firm People's Revolution, explains that fashion is simply "responding" to what men want. Spoken in true PR speak. Has anyone heard about the obesity epidemic in this fucking country? According to the New York Times the average weight of the adult American man has risen from 166.3 in 2002 to 191 pounds today. Meanwhile, Tyson Beckford continues to mentor aspiring male models on Bravo's new reality show Make Me A Supermodel, where the models are put through rigorous exercise regiments to achieve greater muscle mass.

Considering the fact that women wield enormous influence over the wardrobes of the men in their lives, we'll ask you: is there anything stylish or even sexy about the sight of a concave or malnourished man in a pair of skinny jeans?

The Vanishing Point [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353791&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "It Shoes" Are Apparently The New "It Bags" ]]> pradashoe.pngKnow how all sorts of fashion types are screaming from the rooftops about the death of the It Bag? Did you believe them? Cause if you did, well, then keep dreaming: Rising from the ashes of the It Bag is the It Shoe! (Even Miuccia Prada says so, and whatever she says goes.) "The obsession with handbags has finished a little now. It feels over. It's about shoes now," says Prada. Adds Michael Lewis, head of design for Kurt Geiger: "For women, shoes are still about fantasy and dressing up — shoes can make you feel something special in a way a bag really can't. Shoes can give you a different persona." Shoes, of course, also give you bloody heels, hammertoes, bunions and collapsed arches — which leaves us wondering what it all really means.



Says handbag designer Orla Keily: "Looking forward, I think the whole idea of it-anything will be questioned, Whether it's a bag or a shoe, do you really have to have this thing at all? And what about making a personal choice, rather than one that's been dictated to you?" Well fashion is never about need; it's about want. And there will always be a new objet being shilled by the fashion industry, something designed to stir desire in consumers worldwide and simply sell more expensive shit. Expensive shit that everyone else already has.

But if it shoes are the new it bags, we may as well check 'em out: Do you love or loathe the Spring 2008 Prada shoes? After all, if you can't beat 'em...
pradashoes1.gif
pradashoes2.gif
pradashoes3.gif

Make Way For The It Shoe [Independent]

Earlier: Fashion Blogger Announces That "It" Bags Are (Finally) Dead

]]>
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:00:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349755&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fashion Blogger Announces That "It" Bags Are (Finally) Dead ]]> yslmuse.jpgOn November 1 of last year New York Times fashion writer Eric Wilson put forth the bold headline: "Is This It for the It Bag?". Today, Los Angeles Times fashion blogger Monica Corcoran responds with the following: "The It Bag Is Dead. Designers Mourn." Well there you have it! Wrote Wilson back in November: "There is too much inventory. Prices are absurdly high... Status handbags, you see, are a lot like housing. After the rise of the $1,000 purse, fashion's equivalent of the $1 million studio, there inevitably comes talk of a backlash." (In the new issue of Harper's Bazaar, Bottega Veneta designer Tomas Maier rails against the very idea of such bags, calling them "bullshit".) But in her piece today, Corcoran suggests that the death of the It Bag has less to do with economics and more to do with celebrity, i.e., that the way we consume paparazzi images of women more famous more for forgetting to wear underwear could be impacting the status of the objects they carry that we are supposed to aspire to.

The Muse [the It Bag created by Yves Saint Laurent]...was the Palme d'Or among accessory addicts. Like a slain stag slung across the roof of a pickup truck, the Muse signified that a woman had bagged the right bag. Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton and other starlets reserved the cozy crooks of their arms for the popular purse. These days, life pales for the Muse...[T]he YSL handbag was last seen...priced at 20% off. Much like the popular pretty girl who always dies first in a horror film, the "it" bag was a victim of its own ambition.
So really, when you think about it, the It Bag was both killed by Lindsay Lohan and is a metaphor for Lohan herself! Meta.

The it Bag Is Dead. Designers Mourn. [All the Rage]
Related: Is This It for the It Bag? [New York Times]

]]>
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346087&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is The Writer's Strike Bad (Or Good!) For Fashion? ]]> nicolekidman0115.jpgWe all know the writers strike is certainly affecting, well, the writers. And the studios. And us, since there's little to watch now, save The Sarah Connor Chronicles. But wouldn't you know? Those in the always narcissistic fashion industry is worried about how the strike impacts them. Says designer Phillip Lim on the absence of red-carpet creations: "It's about how it trickles down to retailers, how it trickles down to restaurants, how it trickles down to the community. They've got to work it out and get on with it. It's almost selfish to just keep on with the struggle." Uh, what does this have to do with restaurants? And seriously, who is Lim to call the writers "selfish"? Anyway, fashion writer Hadley Freeman is feeling pissy about the strike and fashion too, but for entirely different reasons.



Freeman, who writes for the Guardian, says that all the fuss about the awards shows getting canceled is supremely irritating, particularly because they have become such a huge part of the fashion industry. And she's even more irritated that fashion labels are up in arms about losing out on free advertising/potential revenue since they'll be denied the chance to dress, as Freeman puts it, some "Jessica RandomActress."

I have nothing but sympathy for all the makeup artists, fashion stylists and hairdressers (to say nothing of the nominees) who are missing their moments in the sun through the cancellation at the weekend of the Golden Globes - and possibly of next month's Oscars - due to the writers' strike... But this assumed importance of celebrity has been taken to such extremes in the fashion world......that the shows now seem to be more about the designer showing off which actresses and pop stars - and offspring thereof - they can get in the front row than the clothes on the runway...When designers start to value celebrities over actual customers, the clothes become more expensive, more impractical and seemingly more irrelevant than ever, as is increasingly the situation..... Now it often feels as if designers are tailoring their collections to pander to celebrity stylists and the paparazzi - which would at least explain the continuing popularity on the catwalks of crippling stilettos, minuscule dresses and other clothes designed for lifestyles based on maximum photo opportunities and minimal body fat....And surely it can only be to the good for the fashion world to be reminded, for at least one year, that celebrity endorsement is not the only happy ending.
Actually, we think that no celebrity endorsements is the happy ending. Less Kirsten Dunst for Miu Miu, more Miu Miu speaking for itself, please.

A Designer Explains the Effect of the Writer's Strike On Fashion [NYMag]

Dark Side of the Red Carpet
[Guardian]

]]>
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345029&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bridesmaids Dresses Will Always Be Bad ]]> 27dressespic011008.jpgThough most don't know costume designer Catherine Thomas by name, they are no doubt familiar some of the iconographic cinematic looks she has created (Uma Thurman's yellow leather jumpsuit in Kill Bill; Meryl Streep's Little House-goes-Dolly Parton garb in A Prairie Home Companion). But now Thomas created a number of looks that no self-respecting person would ever want to be associated with: The ugliest, tackiest, trashiest bridesmaids dresses imaginable, part of Katherine Heigl's costumes in 27 Dresses, which opens next Friday. Thomas' favorite? A Gone With the Wind inspired frock, compete with hoop skirt, bonnet, and parasol: "I think that was a combination of both someone from the South and a huge 'Gone With the Wind' fan and Vivien Leigh fan who had this fantasy since she was a little girl to be married in that scenario." Ha! What is it about being able to force your friends into matching dresses and denying them any stake in the decision that so warps women's minds?



Though James Mischka of Badgley Mischka insists that "trends today are much kinder to the bridesmaids than they ever were before" and Mark Badgley backs him up by saying, "The look these days is much more casual," I don't believe it at all. (Seriously, have you checked out bridal "guru" Vera Wang's latest maids' concoctions? I threw up a little in my mouth just looking!) Most brides are still shoving their so-called best-friends in pastel confections that you would not wish upon your worst, ugliest enemy. Tom Nardone, the founder of Uglydress.com, points out that, in their state of nuptial-planning hysteria, "Brides will choose a dress the same way they choose the cake, the chair covers and, especially, the flowers. That's why you get necklines that match the contours of the calla lilies."

Some say, that, when it comes to bridesmaid garb, times are changing — "Girls...want more fashion-forward looks," says Francesca Pitera, the chief designer for Jim Hjelm, a New York bridal house — but I can't help but think this is just another version of the same problem. Ok, fine: Maybe you don't have to wear a baby blue damask silk gown which hangs at the natural waist and has crepe flowers blooming out of the shoulders, but are you really going to feel much better when you see yourself in a picture of the bridal party in 20 years time, bedecked in a burnt-orange baby doll dress? Or a royal purple bubble hem? Because while fashion will always yield cringe-inducing trends laughed at in personal snapshots and such, bridal-party wear is well-documented enough that everyone and their mother gets to have a laugh.

27 Dresses: A Costume Designer's Dream [Reuters]
The Bride Made Me Buy This [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343327&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You're Not A Real Fashion Victim 'Til You've Landed In The ER ]]> lohancritches0109.pngPoor Simon Doonan: the writer and creative director of Barneys New York is suffering from a fashion-inflicted injury, or so he says in his column in this week's New York Observer.
I once laughed unsympathetically when my mother's best friend broke her thumb putting on her girdle, and now, lo many years later, God has seen fit to punish me... It's hard to say if my affliction is more or less embarrassing than that girdle-mangling horror of yore. I will let you be the judge. Here goes: I was felled by a man-bag, a Goyard man-bag at that...After two or three years of lugging round my luxe accessory...I incurred a nasty case of bicep tendinitis....[It] is a painful and immobilizing condition involving months of rehab.
Motivated by his sorry state, Doonan set out to track down fellow victims of the thing we call fashion. After all, who amongst us has not pulled a Linda Wells? (Says the Allure editor-in-chief: "There I was in the dressing room, trapped in a designer straitjacket [aka - a Prada turtleneck], mortified...I still can't understand how one can get into something but not get out of it.")



Doonan's other fashion victim pals include realtor Burt Minkoff (angora in the contact lens landed him in the ER); gallerist Karen Boltrax (Paul Smith clogs fucked up her feet); an anonymous Allure staffer (thrombosis from too-tight leather pants — guesses, anyone?); and US Weekly's Sasha Charnin Morrison (took a tumble leaving a Versace show, got a photo and a Versace band-aid to prove it).

I for one, have an anecdote: It was my sophomore year of college and I had signed up to be a tour guide for prospective students and their parents. Finishing up a tour while walking forwards (not backwards, like a good tour guide should!) in my brand spankin' new ballet flats — which just might have been an eency bit loose in the heel — I tripped, took flight, and landed face down, using only my knees to break my fall. I was rushed to the ER, as the doc on campus was positive I had not one but two broken kneecaps. (They ended up being severely bruised, and I was put on bedrest for 2 weeks.)

Anyway: So here's the challenge: Can you guys top these fashion injury stories? Go for it. Make our day.

Ouch! Argh! We Tumble, We Fall: Fashion Injuries, or the Agony of Angora [NY Observer]

]]>
Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342858&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mr. Blackwell Names Worst-Dressed Women; We Try To Prove Him Wrong ]]> victoriabeckham0108.jpgThe masked man who makes fashion-focused celebs quiver annually with his poison pen, Mr. Blackwell, has released his take on 2007's worst fashion offenders. Britney Spears was spared this year ("I felt that it was inappropriate at this time to make comment, when her personal life is in such upheaval. I hope 2008 is a better year for her," says Mr. Blackwell. Care to comment, Dr. Phil?). From least offensive to most offensive, Blackwell's sartorial derelicts of the year are: Alison Arngrim [Who? -Ed], Lindsay Lohan, Jessica Simpson, Avril Lavigne, Eva Green, Kelly Clarkson, Fergie, Mary Kate Olsen, Amy Winehouse, and Victoria Beckham. And while we've never missed an opportunity to mock any of these girls' outfits when deserving, even we aren't quick to be all-out haters that easily. Which is why, after the jump, we present the best looks of the year from the few, the proud, the Mr. Blackwell's Worst-Dressed 2007.



Victoria Beckham: A new-age Annie Hall! They don't call the girl "posh" for nothing.
blackwellbeckham.jpg
Amy Winehouse: Somewhat precious, yet somehow still manages to channel Billie Holliday. No one sings the blues today quite like Amy.
blackwellamywinehouse.jpg
Mary-Kate Olsen: We always thought no one could look good in white. We were wrong.
blackwellmkolsen.jpg
Fergie: If only she would always stick to structured and sweet looks like this!
blackwellfergie.jpg
Kelly Clarkson: We never met a dress with pockets we didn't like.
blackwellkellyclarkson.jpg
Eva Green: va-Va-VA-VOOOOOM
blackwellevagreen.jpg
Avril Lavigne: Hey, at least she's not wearing combat boots or anything plaid.
blackwellavril.jpg
Jessica Simpson: Who knew J.Simp had tailored and classic in her?!
blackwellsimpson.jpg
Lindsay Lohan: The cooter is covered, the color is divine.
blackwelllohan.jpg
Alison Angrim: Oh come on - this bitch was last on TV decades ago - why does Mr. Blackwell even care about her?
blackwellangrim.jpg

[All photos via FilmMagic and Bauer Griffin.]

Victoria Beckham Tops Worst-Dressed List [AP]
Posh Spice Tops Mr. Blackwell's Worst-Dressed List [US Weekly]

]]>
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:20:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342349&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Raise your hand if you think that high heels ... ]]> Raise your hand if you think that high heels are good for your feet. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? That's what we thought. But thankfully, now we know exactly how we're fucking up our bodies, thanks to this handy-dandy chart, which carefully documents each and every part of the body radically impaired by towering heels. To see the full size image, click on the thumbnail pic. [Boing Boing]

]]>
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:40:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341628&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 2007: The Year Fashion Caught Up With The Times; Lost All Meaning ]]> marc1008.jpgNew York Times fashion scribe Eric Wilson has some deep thoughts to share on the sartorial ramifications of the year 2007. (Let us not forget that this is the very same individual who also championed the antler, complete with allusion to "Gaston" in the Disney cartoon Beauty and the Beast.) In a column today, Wilson comes to the sorry realization that 2007 shall be remembered as the year in which design meant absolutely nothing at all.
[S]cholars may conclude instead that this was the year in which designers finally succumbed to the baser desires of an overheated celebrity culture, in which the only thing that matters is fame and the only means to succeed is by screaming, "Look at me!" At least, that's what they might think after reviewing some of the year's worst fashion moments, in which actions seem so obviously calculated to provoke.



As Wilson asks, what do we remember about Valentino from the previous year? His spectacular 40th anniversary retrospective? No of course not. We remember that he repeatedly asserted that he wasn't going to retire and then, well, announced just that. What do we remember about Marc Jacobs? His rather provocative Spring 2008 collection which perverted notions of femininity and decorum? No: We remember that his Spring 2008 show started a gajillion hours late and that lots of editors got pissed and then Marc got pissier and dyed his hair blue. (And furthermore, fashion itself took a back seat to big ol' nasty hair this year: Nothing calls attention better than pairing ratty cut-offs with a giant beehive, after all. Or, um, just shaving your head.) This was, as Wilson put it, "The Year That Yelled 'Notice Me'." Which raises some interesting questions about fashion itself.


What is it that is off-putting about fashion reflecting a "Look at me!" attitude when, in fact, the very essence of the art is to control and alter the way in which people, well, look at things? What does it mean to be "disappointed" in the fashion industry for shifting its focus away from the clothes and towards the people wearing the clothes? Is this not the very same concept that created the unfortunate sensation that is reality television? Substance means nothing, branding means everything. And the most powerful brands of our time are nothing more than the names of people who have, at best, parlayed their day jobs into celebrity (read: Wilson's dismay over seeing Vera Wang make a cameo appearance on Ugly Betty) and, at worst, have parlayed a lack of a day job into celebrity (read: The Hills, which even Marc Jacobs found important enough to pay a visit to.) We live in the age of "Notice Me." We're just wondering what took fashion so long to catch up with the times.

The Year That Yelled 'Notice Me' [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338037&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Donatella Versace hosted the Versace Christmas ... ]]> donatella1018.jpgDonatella Versace hosted the Versace Christmas party in Milan this weekend. She asked everyone she saw what political party they were affiliated with and whether they liked Hillary or Barack. ("I want Hillary!" she says.) George Michael and Mariah Carey recordings were the background music. She confessed she would like a dog, but that no one will get her one. [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:40:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335890&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Perpetually-youthful designer Betsey Johnson ... ]]> betseyhome1211.pngPerpetually-youthful designer Betsey Johnson is putting her home on 5th Avenue on the market. Not surprisingly, it has pink interiors. Also, it is $3.6 million. That's a lot of pink tutu dresses. [Radar]

]]>
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:45:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PETA Targets Olsen Twins To Hilarious Effect ]]> trollsens.gifPETA: Not so much a fan of those who wear animals! The animal rights organization's new public enemy(ies) number one are none other than the sisters Olsen. Mary-Kate and Ashley are so downright heinous in the eyes of Ingrid Newkirk et.al. that they've inspired an entire website devoted to lambasting the girls, who have been renamed the "Trollsen Twins". Or, more specifically, "Hairy-Kate and Trashley". (Who says PETA has no sense of humor?) There's lots of fun to be had with the Trollsens on the site, on which we spent the better portion of an hour this morning. Our adventures in bloody dolls and other family-friendly fare, after the jump.

trollsensintro.png


The fun begins with a wacky video which uses an old episode of Full House intercut with some new PETA-tastic content to show Hairy-Kate and Trashley as evil fur-wearers, even as seemingly innocent children. Yes, Bob Saget is in it!

trollsens1.png
Next, "Dress Up The Trollsens." The point of this game is to clothe your haggard virtual dolls: Your only choices are fur! And the fur's still alive. Make sure you have the volume turned up, so you can hear the garments go drip drip drip. Brilliant! For reals.

trollsens2.pngPETA even makes petition-signing fun! It's so easy to write to your favorite pro-ana fur-wearers. The Olsens' clothing line, "The Row", is referred to as "Death Row". Don't know about you, but we'll sign anything that doesn't involve having to find an envelope and a stamp to send it in.

trollsens3.pngDon't forget about merchandising! Nothing says Yuletide glee quite like a bloody "Trollsen Twins" tank. Perfect for everyone on your holiday shopping list, really.

trollsens4.pngOoh! Free downloads! Revel in this downright terrifying Trollsen twin banner for the website of your choosing.

Meet the Trollsen Twins [PETA]
Related:
Twin Targets [NYP]
PETA Launches Trollsens Website [Sassybella]

]]>
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332390&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Not Gay Enough For 'Project Runway'? Try Your Hand At 'Design Wars' ]]> designwars.pngNow