<![CDATA[Jezebel: Expensive Shit]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: Expensive Shit]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/expensive shit http://jezebel.com/tag/expensive shit <![CDATA[ You'll Need Gold Bars To Afford <i>Lucky</i>'s "Loose Change" ]]> The October issue of Lucky magazine has a page in the back with the slug "Fashion Babble." The headline? "Loose Change." Editor Andrea Linett "thinks it's time for a slightly disheveled and very sexy, girly look," the copy reads. And you might be thinking, awesome, especially if I can get said sexy, disheveled look for "loose change," as in, the coins jingling around in the bottom of my purse. Silly rabbit! This is Lucky, where "loose change" requires deep pockets. We added up all of Andrea Linett's items. Check out how much "loose change" you'll need to carry to get the look she's recommending, after the jump.



Ring...............$1,100
Cardigan...........$545
Dress................$978
Hat....................$295
Boots.................$150
Eye makeup.........$18
Makeup brush......$32

Total: $3,118

]]>
Jezebel-5047536 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5047536&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Smackdown: <i>Cosmopolitan</i> Vs. <i>Teen Vogue</i> ]]> Today, in the last of our matchups in the September "expensive shit" smackdown, we bring you a battle of the generations. Cosmopolitan was throwing out her back with new acrobatic sex positions when Teen Vogue was just a twinkle in Anna Wintour's eye. But can even the best-selling women's magazine in the world stand up to a snotty adolescent with unfettered access to Mama Vogue's credit cards? Will the Dara Torres of ladymags beat out her teenage competition, or will Vogue's Satanic offspring finally manage to take down her slutty 122-year-old cougar aunt? Find out after the jump, and check back later today for the winner of our Expensive Shit Charity Case contest.







Cosmopolitan

Apparel: $14,128 (most expensive item: Gucci studded motorcycle jacket, $5,395; least expensive: Forever 21 wide-waistband mini, $19.80; average price: $239)

Accessories: $12,375 (most expensive item: Gucci embellished ankle bootees, $995; least expensive: Forever 21 necklace, $6.80; average price: $174)

Beauty: $1,184 (most expensive item: Elizabeth Arden Prevage Anti-Aging Treatment, $155; least expensive: Suave Vibrant Shine Mist, $2.49; average price: $25)

Other: Cosmo only listed one "other" item, the board game 'Them and Us', $19.99, which "pits men against women by having the teams answer questions about topics that are stereotypically male and female. [Some of the items listed on the card "Things Men Like to Buy" are alcohol, magazines, and meat. Under "Things Women Like to Do" we have eat chocolate, be put on a pedestal, and watch daytime TV.]

Total Shit: $26,548

Average: $148

Teen Vogue

Apparel: $33,377 (most expensive item: Dsquared2 shirt, $1,395; least expensive: American Apparel T-shirt, $15; average price: $276)

Accessories: $36,761 (most expensive item: Tiffany sapphire and platinum necklace, $1,750; least expensive: Hue tights, $11; average price: $278)

Beauty: $1,223 (most expensive item: Jean Paul Gualtier Ma Dame Eau De Toilette, $87 for 3.3oz; least expensive: Jessica Nail Polish in Windsor Castle, $7; average price: $45)

Other: $553 (most expensive item: Fujifilm Finepix Z20FD digital camera, $180; least expensive: Uniqlo umbrella, $8; average price: $92)

Total Shit: $71,914
Average: $251

Mama Vogue has trained you well, grasshopper!

Winner: Teen Vogue

]]>
Jezebel-5043422 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:00:00 EDT Intern Margaret http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043422&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Smackdown: <i>Harper's Bazaar</i> Vs. <i>W</i> ]]> Every year, we offer you up to the minute coverage of the competition between the beefed up September fashion magazines for the title of "most full of shit." In this year's second match, Harper's Bazaar goes up against W, with Intern Anna and I tallying up the priced merchandise in each magazine to determine which luxury ladymag is the champion of crass consumerism. Sadly, this round has been rocked by scandal: W has flouted the time-honored rules of the September Smackdown by not including prices for 85% of the featured merchandise. After the jump, we wrestle with questions of sportsmanship so epic they'll make you forget about some possibly underage gymnasts and declare our winner.





Harper's Bazaar

Apparel: $931,929 (most expensive item: Michael Kors coat, $85,000; least expensive: American Apparel tights $14; average price: $3,006)

Accessories: $1,006,052 (most expensive item: LChopard necklace [in bizarre Tyra Banks as Michelle Obama shoot], $390,000; least expensive: Kenneth Jay Lane ring, $75; average price: $2313)

Beauty: $445 (most expensive item: Euoko W-31 Extreme White Concentrate Ampoules [basically: skin whitener], $710; least expensive item: Pantene Pro-V Beautiful Lengths Shampoo, $3.99; average price: $64)

Other: $355 (most expensive item: Elsa Peretti for Tiffany & Co. brush, $250; least expensive: Smithson of Bond Street notebook, $105; average price: $177.5 [there were only two "other" products in the mag])

Total Shit: $1,938,781
Average: $2,376




W

Apparel: $40,318 (most expensive item: Michael Kors sequined silk organza sheath, $10,000; least expensive: Blumarine sequined silk tank top, $2,165; average price: $6,720)

Accessories: $233,735 (most expensive item: Milus 18k rose gold and diamond watch with mother-of-pearl face, $91,000; least expensive: Anna Sheffield for Cole Haan sterling silver and coin bracelet, $295; average price: $6,678)

Beauty: $1000 [W only listed the price of one beauty product, La Prairie's Cellular Cream Platinum Rare. The price is on the cover under the line "What Recession?"]

Other: $10,875 (most expensive item: Kelly Wearstler one-of-kind brass and silver boxes adorned with crystals and semiprecious stones acquired by Wearstler during her travels, $3,950 to $6,500 [only seven boxes are in existence]; least expensive item: six-course lunch and dinner at the Biennale des Antiquaires in Paris, prepared by 10 top Paris chefs, starting price is $475 per person; average price: $3,625)

Total Shit: $285, 928
Average: $6,354

Harper's Bazaar beat W soundly in Total Shit, but can Bazaar's unaffordable shit really stand up W, in which 85% of the items fall into the category "if you have to ask, you can't afford it?" Considering that the average W item costs three times as much as a Harper's Bazaar item, it's a safe bet that if W listed prices, it could have come out on top. But since we cannot condone such unsportsmanlike behavior, W is disqualified.

Winner: Harper's Bazaar

And don't forget our Expensive Shit(fight) contest, in which we'll give $200 to the charity of choice of whoever correctly guesses the total amount of shit in the September issues of the ladymags.

Earlier: Shameless September Ladymags: Harper's Bazaar Vs. W

]]>
Jezebel-5041771 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:00:00 EDT Intern Margaret http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041771&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Smackdown: <i>Elle</i> Vs. <i>Vogue</i> ]]> Last year we treated you to cage-matches between the behemoth September issues of the major women's magazines. The winner: whichever bloated publication has the most expensive shit festering between its pages. The prize: our loathing. This year's first bout, officiated by myself and Intern Margaret, is between stylish sumo wrestler Elle (clocking in at 636 pages)and snooty superheavyweight Vogue (798 pages). Now that the Olympics are over, check out as these two try to pin each other to the (diamond-encrusted) mat.







Elle

Apparel: $573,038 (most expensive item: Chanel dress, $17,355; least expensive: Express t-shirt $17; average price: $1,897)

Accessories: $967,092 (most expensive item: Louis Vuitton diamond-encrusted watch, $135,000; least expensive: Payless pump, $28; average price: $2,671)

Beauty: $2,227 (most expensive item: Linea Pro C2 Digital Flatiron, $199; least expensive item: tie between Aussie Mega Hairspray and Herbal Essences Set Me Up Extra Hold Hairspray, both $3; average price: $30)

Other: $19,743 (most expensive item: Alexandra settee, $8,000; least expensive: Mallo cup candies, $1.50; average price: $1,161)

Total Shit: $1,562,100
Average: $2,072




Vogue

Apparel: $704,256 (most expensive item: Fendi 24K-gold mink coat, $64,300; least expensive: Brooks running bra $38; average price: $4,294)

Accessories: $237,889 (most expensive item: Maison Martin Margiela 18K-pink-gold cuff bracelet from Line 12, $18,395; least expensive: Speedo swim cap, $12; average price: $1,441)

Beauty: $107 (most expensive item: Missoni solid fragrance compact on a charm bracelet, $50; least expensive: YSL Gloss Pur in Noir, $28; average price: $36) [Vogue didn't give prices for most beauty products]

Other: $15,435 (most expensive item: [and best caption in the mag]: "Skunk is on reclaimed wood-and-steel table, $5,495, ABC Carpet & Home, NYC"; least expensive: yoga to the People class, suggested donation: $10 per class; average price: $702)

Total Shit: $957,687
Average: $2,705

Elle has Vogue beat in Total Shit, mostly on the strength of its accessories (just try telling time with that diamond-encrusted watch). But Vogue has a mink coat dipped in gold, and everyone knows that with fur AND gold, you just can't lose.

Winner: Vogue

Earlier: Shameless September Ladymags: Elle Vs. Vogue

]]>
Jezebel-5041088 Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:00:00 EDT Anna N. http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041088&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Expensive Shit ]]> Behold a page from the August issue of Bazaar. The magazine "celebrates fashion at AFFORDABLE prices." Since when is a $385 skirt a "great find?" Or a $285 sweater? Or a $325 bag? (Click to enlarge.)

]]>
Jezebel-5031575 Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031575&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ I'm Sure Claude Would Be Flattered And All, But $80 Million Is Almost What Afghanistan Made On Its Heroin Tax ]]>

  • Some anonymous collector just bought this Monet for $80.4 million from the kids of some famous collectors from Columbus, Indiana. No really, I thought it was a mistake too, but there really is a Columbus, Indiana, and before they died the couple who amassed this insane art collection were like the hipster royal family there. [NYT]
  • A Druze border policeman killed himself in Israel while Sarkozy was watching and the family is asking that his name not be released, but like, I kind of think it's a little late for that. [Haaretz]
  • I'm not saying we should adopt all Afghanistan's policies but $100 million just from taxing shit most countries pay hundreds of billions criminalizing sounds pretty tempting…[BBC
  • Obama is polling creepily well right now, which makes me nervous, but can you blame the voters when McCain is out there straight-talking about how his offshore drilling ideas are kind of cheap psychological tricks? [MSNBC]
  • Okay, if you haven't figured it out yet, Anne Hathaway's boyfriend Rafaello Follieri hired priests, bought robes, fabricated "engineering plans" and bribed low-level Vatican tourism officials — along with some sort of Italian journalist — to make people think he was the chief financial officer of the Vatican, endowed with the unique privilege of selling off Catholic Church properties all over the world, only all of that was a complete load of shit and he knew essentially no one, and the fraud is kind of awe-inspiringly brazen, and thankfully New York decided to digest its juicy bits. [NY Mag]
  • You know what, Nancy Pelosi? Amen. [Chicago Sun-Times]
  • If all the world's millionaires lived in a single city it would have almost two million more people than New York and no fucking clue where to get its nails done. [Yahoo]
  • "I don't go out as much as I used to. Instead of going to a bar I'll stay home and get a six-pack."A story on the dismal consumer sentiment numbers out today hits home to the blogger drinking a $3 22 ounce Sierra Nevada. [WSJ]
  • Florida is trying to cut down on carbs. [Wash Post

]]>
Jezebel-5019392 Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:30:00 EDT Moeiscaterwaulingaboutthepatriarchy http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019392&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kira Plastinia: The Last Pointless 15-Year-Old Rich Person I Ever Want To Read About ]]> “I think teenagers are all the same everywhere,” says Kira Plastinia, a 15-year-old Russian, and "wrinkles her nose." Kira is apparently the Miley Cyrus meets Mary Kate Olsen of the former Soviet Republics; her dad, an orange juice mogul, bought her a a clothing line, and a signature shade of pink, and Paris Hilton's number, and a horse named Baloven — meaning "someone who is spoiled and treated too well" — and now a store in Manhattan, which has inspired a profile in New York Magazine. Wait, am I really burdening you with this information? Do we really have such a dearth of the great global wealth concentration's photogenic beneficiaries over here? Over the weekend I was dutifully forcing myself to read the NY Times' review of a book called Bringing Home The Birkin, which chronicles the quest of an eBay Power Seller to land one of the coveted Hermes bags. "What is a Birkin bag and why on earth should I care?" demands editor Sam Tanenhaus of the book's critic, T: The New York Times Style Magazine editor Christine Muhlke, on the Review's weekly podcast.

"You shouldn't!" I yell at my laptop.

Muhlke tries, patiently, to explain that the bag was inspired by Jane Birkin, who had trouble keeping her shit together on planes, and the CEO of Hermes felt so sorry for her.
"And who is Jane Birkin?" Sam Tanenhaus wants to know.
"Jane Birkin," Muhlke replies, laughing, "was the wife, or possibly not actual wife of the French singer…please help me…"
ZOMG!
"…Serge Gainsbourg."

Yeah, exactly. The trappings of wealth are really fucking boring and no one fucking cares, not even the editor of T: The New York Times Style Magazine, and pretending that we really actually care because that's what the cool people do is just creating a dull class of international jet-setters who are all indistinguishably dull, and with that I'm going to leave you with two profound paragraphs from the Kira profile and the excerpt to Bringing Home The Birkin which will maybe bring some joy to going about the rest of your day poor.

More than ever, she’s right. A generation ago Russian teenagers were trading for jeans on the black market and listening to hopelessly out-of-date Billy Joel. But there’s no lag, anymore, between the culture that European and American teenagers consume and what makes its way to Russia. Kira and her friends vacillate between punk and pop and R&B with the same immediacy as their counterparts in Orange County or Leeds. They study photos of Lindsay Lohan’s leggings, Nicole Richie’s hair. Kira’s friends wear Abercrombie & Fitch, Topshop, and Hollister, bought during trips abroad or ordered on the Internet.

And here readers, the epiphany that inspired the writer to quit his job and start arbitraging overpriced handbags on eBay for a living:

But lately I found myself becoming more jaded by my globe-trotting. Not because of the silly things you always heard those bridge-club biddies bemoaning in the airport — it wasn't lost luggage or the lack of a proper bagel that had me down. I didn't mind the calculus of currency conversion or the etymology of exotic entrées. No, it wasn't the inconvenience inherent to travel that was burning me out. It was boredom. I had increasingly noticed a sinister sameness about each of these foreign cities. Before my very eyes, every place was turning into every place else.

The Russian-American Princess [NY Mag]
Bringing Home The Birkin [New York Times First Chapters]
Bag Man [New York Times]

]]>
Jezebel-5009781 Mon, 19 May 2008 17:00:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009781&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Expensive Shit ]]> birdpoop042508.jpgWith all the shit you put on your face did you ever think about putting actual shit on your face? Apparently some people do. A spa in New York City offers a $180 "Geisha Facial" that includes one special ingredient: bird poop. Nightingale droppings have been used for centuries in Japan by Geisha and Kabuki dancers to take off their stage makeup and remove wrinkles. But isn't $180 a bit much to have someone rub shit on your face — and take away a bit of your dignity while they are doing it? The answer is yes! Especially considering we found it for less than 20 bucks online. [Reuters, Chidoriya]

]]>
Jezebel-384148 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:20:00 EDT maria http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384148&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <em>Sex And The City</em> Lingerie: I'm Just Not That Into It ]]> satcmovie1126.pngA not-so-shocking prediction: Sex and the City: The Movie is going to be as much (if not more) about shilling expensive shit as it is about sex. In addition to the myriad of product placement opportunities it affords mainstream marketers, the film has inspired a new collection of Cosabella lingerie said to be designed around each one of the HBO series' main characters. Thing is, I see no connection between the creations and the SATC ladies; in fact, of all of them, the "Samantha" collection is the most sophisticated and tasteful of the bunch. After the jump, let's get stupid and play the "which SATC character are you" game with a batch of undergarments!



Carrie
They say: "Carrie is carefree and fabulous with a truly romantic take on love and life. The eclectic Carrie Collection features floral print with animal print trim... [It] mixes hip, downtown style with vintage appeal. You can even pair it with your favorite jeans."
cosabellasatccarrie.gif

L to R: Carrie Collection, Betty Low Rise Thong, $36; Carrie Collection, Betty Bustier, $162.00; Carrie Collection, Betty Push-Up Bra, $86

I say: Does "carefree", "fabulous", and "romantic" mean "tacky", "cheap", and "downright mismatched"? Also, is anyone else amused that this line is the most expensive of the bunch?


Samantha
They Say: "The Samantha Collection is très sexy & unapologetically racy (just like its namesake). Featuring French Chantilly lace in a fabulously bold, expressive color, this bra is not one to be ignored."
cosabellasatcsamantha.gif

L to R: Samantha Collection, Pearl Underwire Bra, $76; Samantha Collection, Pearl Garter Belt, $55; Samantha Collection, Pearl Low Rise Thong, $33

I say: "Racy"? Maybe to a nun. This collection is the only classy and sophisticated one of the bunch. (Unrelated: why does the Samantha bra cost $10 less than the Carrie bra?)


Charlotte
They Say: "Über feminine, the Charlotte Collection features eco-friendly bamboo fiber. Charlotte is all about classic elegance. She always wears a perfectly chic ensemble that incorporates her style, beauty and quiet confidence."
cosabellasatccharlotte.gif

L to R: Charlotte Collection, Bamboo Camisole, $80; Charlotte Collection, Bamboo Long Pants, $100; Charlotte Collection, Bamboo Low Rise Thong, $22

I say: This stuff looks like it came straight off the racks at K-Mart. Charlotte York MacDougal Goldenblatt probably doesn't even know what a K-Mart is.


Miranda
They Say: "The cosmopolitan Miranda Collection includes this bold, color block bra with lace trim. Feeling like a confident, independent woman? You're probably a 'Miranda.'"
cosabellasatcmiranda.gif

L to R: Miranda Collection, Rosangel Low Rise Hotpants, $50; Miranda Collection, Rosangel Molded Bra, $62

I say: Why does Miranda get fewer items than the other ladies in this collection?. Also: of course they put her in a boy short. Of course.


Sex And The City Lingerie [Outblush]
Earlier: Sex And The City Really Is Full Of Expensive Shit

]]>
Jezebel-382622 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382622&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Parenting Author, Childless Woman Weigh In On <i>Baby Couture</i> ]]> BABYCOUTURECOVER041508.jpgBehold Baby Couture, the snotty new magazine with the slogan, "We put the 'coo' in couture." Poor, poor rich mommies! They've always wanted a publication they can call their own, that's filled with overpriced items perfect for pampering their spawn — and clearly not for mere commoners who shop at Babies R Us. Baby Couture delivers. I've got no kids of my own, so I asked Pamela Paul, mother-of-two and author of the new book Parenting, Inc.: How We Are Sold on $800 Strollers, Fetal Education, Baby Sign Language, Sleeping Coaches, Toddler Couture, and Diaper Wipe Warmers — and What It Means for Our Children for some insight. After the jump, Pamela and I give gut-reaction impressions to pages of the magazine.











BABYCOUTURELOGO041508.jpgDodai: I just wanted to point out that their slogan is not a joke. It's very very real.

BABYCOUTUREEDLETTER041508.jpgDodai: The Editor's letter begins, "I am what I've coined a 'serial miserablist.'" I stopped reading after that.
Pamela: "Miserabilist," "nitpicking about my body," people with "an ugly core," "an attack of gastritis." Um, isn't this supposed to be a fun magazine about kiddie clothes?

BABYCOUTURESWING041508.jpgDodai: This swingset looks great, huh? It's all natural, made from white cedar. And it rings up at an affordable $21,850.
Pamela: Just what you need when the local playground is crawling with untold numbers of germs and the unwashed masses of neighborhood toddlers.

BABYCOUTUREWOODFURN041408.jpgDodai: $648 worth of furniture for kids never looked so depressing. To hell with the planet: Bring on the bright plastic chairs! Kidding. Sort of.
Pamela: The designer baby furniture world is still mired in mid-century modern, which seems so 2005 now. My favorite is the abstract, minimalist rocking horse, oddly not featured here. It looks more like an abdominizer than a toy.

BABYCOUTURESTROLLERS041508.jpgDodai: The stroller on the left is $400; the stroller on the right is $759. As far as I can tell, neither are guaranteed to keep a kid from screaming his head off in the grocery store.
Pamela: The one on the right has its own catalog, filled with photos of hipster parents and nary a child in sight. It's all about us.

BABYCOUTURERODSTEWART041508.jpgDodai: Really? Parents want their infants dressed like Rod Stewart's baby? Really?
Pamela: Is this child from Rod's third or fourth batch? Fifth?!

BABYCOUTUREMODELS041508.jpgDodai: Ah, child models. One can almost smell the ennui from here.
Pamela: I am fairly certain I spot eye shadow. To think I waited until 8th grade before breaking into Ultima II.

BABYCOUTURECOVERBABY041508.jpgDodai: The feature story, "A Perfect World," is an interview and photo shoot with covermommy Christine Costner and son Cayden. It is TEN PAGES LONG. If I'd had the patience to read it I'm sure I would have found it fascinating.
Pamela: Cayden, Aiden, Braydon, Jayden. Will and Jada, look what you started! Please make this whole trend go away.

BABYCOUTURECAYDENCOSTNER041.jpgDodai: Then again, maybe not.
Pamela: In this hard-hitting feature, Costner is described as "not just any actor," but "one of the world's most respected thespians." (Insert Native American whooping sounds here)

BABYCOUTUREASIANKIDS041508.jpgDodai: Wow, Asian kids!
Pamela: Oh, parenting magazines love Asian babies. It's only when they get older that editors seem to decide they're "not cute" any more.

BABYCOUTUREBLACKREDHEAD0415.jpgDodai: Black kid! Redhead kid! Baby Couture is officially more diverse than Vogue.
Pamela: Working our collective nostalgia for 1986 Benetton.

BABYCOUTURESAUCYMINX041508.jpgDodai: Saucy minx. She's totally going to tell all the kids in the sandbox she's a model.
Pamela: They'll rip off that bunny necklace in a flash. It's probably laced with lead anyway.

BABYCOUTOUREENOUGHALREADY04.jpgDodai: Okay, enough already. I've officially reached baby overload. No. More. Thanks.
Pamela: Please tell me why this baby is wearing a shower cap. Oh, it's a bonnet. Doesn't make it any better.

Baby Couture Magazine [Baby Couture]

Related: Parenting, Inc.: How We Are Sold on $800 Strollers, Fetal Education, Baby Sign Language, Sleeping Coaches, Toddler Couture, and Diaper Wipe Warmers — and What It Means for Our Children [Amazon]
Pamela Paul's Website [PamelaPaul.com]

]]>
Jezebel-380120 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:20:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380120&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gwen Stefani Wants You To Smell Like A Doll ]]> harajukulovers040408.png
  • Gwen Stefani's soon-to-be-released Harajuku Lovers fragrance collection comes with dolls that look just like her own Harajuku girl back-up dancers. WTF. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • OMG is Britney Spears going to "collaborate" on a clothing line with Ed Hardy? Like whoah. [Star]
  • The newest Donatella-designed Versace watch retails for $226,800. Says Donatella: "Women don't really need a watch to tell time today — they have their cell phones and BlackBerries." You heard it straight from the horse's mouth: It's expensive shit you don't need. [WWD, 1st item]
  • Why does making your own deodorant actually sound like fun? [BellaSugar]

  • More expensive shit: Armani luggage. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • And more still: Pictures of Kate Moss's face. [Vogue UK]
  • So-called upscale beauty brands Clarins, Kiehl's, Origins, Bare Escentuals and Bumble and Bumble are now selling their wares through so-called not-upscale mass retailer Target. The brands are all nervous about diluting their image. Don't they know? Getting something at Target is the new getting something at Bloomingdale's. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Why do watch brands need "ambassadors"? Um, here is an essay that explains it. [Financial Times]
  • Bras: Big business in Britain. [Telegraph]
  • Speaking of which, Agent Provocateur has relaunched their website and it is "steamy" and "raunchy" and "seamy." Enjoy! [Telegraph]
  • For those of you deeply concerned about where all of Carla Bruni's clothes are coming from, rest assured: her rep says, that she "either borrows or buys. And it's all her personal budget. It's not the state budget. The same goes for her hair and makeup." [WWD, sub req'd]
  • The amazing Chan Marshall (aka Cat Power) on being a "muse" to Karl Lagerfeld: "I don't think I'm a muse. I'm just like... A regular, maybe. Just a character in Karl's world." [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Aw, tear! Hearst is starting a website called DonateMyDress.org where real-life Serena van der Woodsens can donate their old clothes to real-life Jenny Humphreys. No chance in hell the Blair Waldorfs are going to get in on the act. [WWD, 3rd item]
  • Kim Stewart is the "face" of Ciate's paint pots, aka nail polish. When you see Kim Stewart, is a manicure is the first thing you think of? [Kiss And Makeup]
  • The NYPD had a good time in Queens last night, confiscating $5.5 million in fake Burberry, Chanel, Coach, Fendi, Kate Spade, Gucci and Prada bags. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • MAC is opening up something called a Pro Store that isn't just retail, but an "educational center" as well. Hmm, smells like a ruse to get you to spend more time at the counter, and more money on expensive shit. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Christian Louboutin: Now doing resort footwear. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • This is what I look like in sunglasses. [Coutorture]
]]>
Jezebel-376017 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376017&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fug Footwear: A Step In The Wrong Direction ]]> pradashoe.png"What do you think of these?" I asked my boyfriend, showing him an image of the It Shoes of the season, the Prada sandal platforms that, according to a story on hideous heels in today's New York Observer, look "like the work of someone on acid, or at least weed". "I dunno," replied boyfriend. "Guys don't notice shoes." Women, however, do, which is why it is so very odd that this season's most-talked about accessories are the ugliest expensive shit you ever saw. So why are women shelling out the big bucks for things that might turn you to stone for looking at them, if you don't break your back walking in them? Are ugly and overpriced shoes the latest ploy by retailers to create a wealthy elite?

Let's face it. If you are a normal person, you do not have close to $800 to spend on a pair of shoes. And even if you did, you would probably be spending it on something you could wear over and over again, or, hell, something you could wear at all. (Forget "if you have to ask you can't afford it", this is "if you have to be mobile you can't afford it.")

"I feel horrible when my girls come in here and say, 'I can't spend this much on sandals,' " says one boutique owner, who spoke with the Los Angeles Times regarding the rising price of ridiculous shoes. "They think it's my fault, but I am paying these high prices too." Another LA boutique owner agrees. "When Chloé came on the scene, I remember noticing it. All of a sudden, every line started designing a shoe collection that was more elaborate and more expensive."

Why do women do it? Bankrupting themselves, making their tootsies uglier and forcing pain upon themselves for some perverse pleasure gotten from owning something so impractical, so debilitating, and so (we repeat) fug? Let us not forget the sagacious words of our favorite paper, London's Daily Mail, which explains the allure of high heels thusly: "Men like an exaggerated female figure." Yeah, my boyfriend who insists men aren't looking at my feet? Apparently he's right.

Whatsa Matter With Choo? [NY Observer]
Manolo Lovers Feel Financial Pain At the Pump [LA Times]
Life's Little Mysteries [Daily Mail]

[Image via Style.com]

]]>
Jezebel-375294 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375294&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One! ]]> There is a totally made-up story in today's New York Times about Bottega Veneta. You know Bottega. They make those basketweave-y leather bags. Unless you don't know Bottega, in which case now you know the source of all the noxious superiority fumes whenever you're in the realm of one of the carriers of one of those basketweavy bags. Well, here's the "trend": The idea is that Bottega's bags are getting popular because they are more "understated" than flashy Louis Vuitton bags, and people are sick of logos. You know, the basketweave, it is not quite like a logo. No one knows where it's from. Until they do. And then they recognize it everywhere they see it. So it's like a logo, but subtler. Plus, you can't knock it off! So people know you spent a lot of money. Sort of like with a logo, if all the people who stole other people's logos were rounded off and thrown in Guantanamo Bay like God intended. Seriously though. I have known about Bottega since 2006, when I took a press trip to Hong Kong, on which a publicist was hellbent on acquiring a knockoff...Bottega Veneta.

Her determination about this endeavor, and the obvious joy she took in the knockoff Bottega's acquisition, quite disturbed a pretty friend of mine who was also on the press trip. It was so shallow! But fast forward two years, and said pretty friend shows up to meet me toting...a Bottega Veneta! What happened? Below, an exclusive interview with said friend as to how she learned to stop worrying and love conspicuous consumption.

MOE: You! I have to consult you about something. And that something is...your handbag.
  Your anonymity will be closely guarded.
 
PRETTYFRIEND: um, ok. go

MOE: Is it Bottega?

PRETTYFRIEND: ha! i'm glad you think that. i got it for $20 off the street before i went to barcelona in the fall. hahahahaha!
take that [PUBLICIST] "hong kkong" [PUBLICIST]

MOE: The thing that's so funny about this story is how it's like, "Bottega is all about understated logo free design."
And I'm thinking, if it gets knocked off, it is a fucking logo.

PRETTYFRIEND: "Instead of buying a $1,500 handbag that may be indistinguishable from versions selling for one tenth of the price, they may part with several thousand dollars for a piece that looks durable and worth the splurge."
ha!

MOE: I just don't understand, after a certain age, why you would buy something so that...people would know you spent a lot of money on it.

PRETTYFRIEND: isn't that mostly with the upwardly mobile middle class? like the black guy that has to get rims on his car because he lives in a neighborhood where that is necessary blah blah blah
with women, it's mostly handbags, shoes and sun glasses. god, sunglasses. when did they start selling for $600?

MOE: oh. my. god. serioulsy.
  SUNGLASSES
  THAT IS A POST.
  WTF SUNGLASSES?

PRETTYFRIEND: that is DEFINITELY a post
 
MOE: THE MARGIN ON SUNGLASSES MUST BE LIKE 99.999999%
 
PRETTYFRIEND: because even the cheap-o brands have their names on teh side so you immediately know NOT GUCCI

MOE: ok but here's the thing, the people who get rims are usually not middle class ...they are more like...what became of the middle class.

PRETTYFRIEND: true. maybe a better example are women and ridiculous shoes. i mean to a certain extent a black patent leather pump is just a black patent leather pump, right? unless it's a christian loubitan and then it's an $800 pump which also happens to have a read sole
  red sole

MOE: Right, but why do middle and upper-middle class educated professional women fall prey to the same silly forces we associate with the rims-weilding lumpen?
  rims-rolling, excuse me.
  And all this shit starts with the plutocracy anyway.
I suppose Toqueville could answer that. sigh american exceptionslism long sigh

PRETTYFRIEND: wait, i have to run. but i just want to say that i do own ridiculous shoes — and not just because one of my lesbian friends works at saks and could get me a 65% discount. i own them because i am in a group of friends where everyone owns them
  and they make my calves look fecking fantastic
and yes, when i get too drunk i start smoking
i am that girl
sigh

MOE: i love you

You'll Know How Much You Spent [NY Times]

]]>
Jezebel-373004 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373004&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Anna Wintour Taking Money From Charity To Pay Amy Linehouse? ]]> amywinehouse0319.jpg
  • Does Anna Wintour love Amy Winehouse even more than Karl Lagerfeld does? Word on the street is that the singer who wouldn't go to rehab only to go to rehab has been offered $1 million to play at the Wintour-hosted Costume Institute Gala. But a rep says that can't be true since the Costume Institute Gala is supposed to be, you know, a benefit. For the children probably! [WWD, 1st item]
  • Some outfit called the New Enthusiasm is spoofing Marc Jacobs and Juergen Teller, the guy who shoots all those ads of his, with John McEnroe and Bjorn Borg, and now everyone is wondering what could possibly be the motive behind such a peculiar stunt. We have no earthly idea! That is why we present you with this hyperlink, so you can further ponder what it all means. [Sassybella]
  • Anya Hindmarch's London flagship was burgled last night, the second robbery the store has experienced in the past year. Can you think of a handbag designer whose inventory you would covet less than Anya's? Because I'm having trouble. [Vogue UK]
  • Oh god, you know, just when this industry's political statements could not get any more absurd: Agent Provacateur's "Fair Trial My Arse" underwear. [Sassybella]
  • Also, the rumors aren't true: Katie Homes is not designing for Armani. [E!]

  • Model Lauren Bush's most trauma-ramatic moment? "[O]ne Passover when we were on Coney Island, New York, where lots of conservative Jews live. It was a swimwear shoot, but luckily the theme was Fifties so nothing was too scandalous. Anyway, a crowd of Hasidic teenagers surrounded the camera. I was so embarrassed, I felt like I was corrupting them on a religious holiday." [Times of London]
  • Nordstrom is going green. And if you thought this wouldn't somehow involve a "collaboration" with a fancy designer you'd never heard of to design a reusable (and collectible!) shopping tote, well you would be wrong. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Alexander McQueen, hellbent on world domination, is showing not only in Paris, but in a mini-show in New York next week. [Vogue UK]
  • Designer Adam Lippes is turning his Meatpacking District NYC store into an outpost for the ASPCA April 4-6, when the only thing you'll be able to do in the store is adopt a pooch who needs a good home. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Lululemon, the yogawear line that got into all that trouble when they said their garments were made of seaweed and, then, er, they weren't, is now issuing a line of running clothes which they claim contain sensors built into the garment that serve as a heart rate monitor. [WWD, 3rd item]
  • Banana Republic is doing a limited edition eco-friendly collection of clothes in honor of Earth Day, on sale during the month of April. Um, what about the 11 other months in a year? [WWD, 1st item]
  • And Club Monaco is issuing its first-ever swimwear collection, but it has absolutely nothing to do with Earth Day. [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Philip Lim: Doing a trench coat for Coach. Yawn. [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Designer Jasper Conran is moving on up: The Queen has tapped him to become an Officer of the British Empire. [Vogue UK]
  • Expensive shit alert: A diamond-bedecked faucet! [Chic Report]
  • And, um, Gmail: The Soap? [Chic Report]
]]>
Jezebel-369661 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:30:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <em>Sex And The City</em> Really Is Full Of (Expensive) Shit ]]> carriebradshaw0317.jpgQuestion: Is Sex and the City in on the joke? According to WWD, in the upcoming film version of the HBO series, Carrie Bradshaw questions her assistant (played by Jennifer Hudson) about just how she affords a slew of designer accessories on an assistant's salary. [I'd like to see the assistant ask the same thing of Carrie 'I'm a writer in New York' Bradshaw. -Ed.] The assistant's answer? The bag-renting website Bag, Borrow, or Steal. Our answer? Sex and the City is not in on the joke — it's just found another way to land a corporate sponsor! And clearly, striking some strategic branding deals with fashion designers in exchange for costuming credits wasn't good enough.

According to the NY Times, in exchange for Skyy Vodka being the official spirit of the film, Houlihans is now also serving up Skyy Carrie, Miranda, Charlotte, and Samantha 'tinis. Other companies that have signed on for the film are Coty fragrances, Vitaminwater, Mercedes-Benz USA, and the jeweler H. Stern. Says Chris Carlisly, the marketing president for the film's distributor, New Line: "We've positioned this movie from the beginning as 'the Super Bowl for women'.. So we want to align only with those brands that make sense, that match up with the 'Sex and the City' brand, and extend our footprint, not duplicate it." We're not sure what footprints (other than carbon ones) have to do with this movie, but one thing is for sure: This ain't no film, it's a 2-hour commercial. Clarifies exec producer John Melfi: "It's not sticking a bowl of cereal or a Coca-Cola in front of the camera. It's organic to the lives of the ladies." Which we all know are totally devoid of any trace of reality anyway.

'Sex and the City' And Its Lasting Feminine Appeal [NYT]
For Rent [WWD, 1st item]

Earlier: Carrie Bradshaw's Wardrobe To be Both Sexy And Subsidized
M Week With A $4,000 Snakeskin Handbag

]]>
Jezebel-368698 Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368698&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Holy Itshay, What Is That Big Black Man Doing On The Cover Of <i>Vogue</i>?! ]]> gisele-lebron-james-vogue.jpg
  • Gisele appears on the cover of the April Vogue with...Lebron James. This is may seem like an historic event on par with, say, a black president, but that would belie how far we've come as a nation, revealed by the dead-first comment reacting to the news on our brother blog Deadspin: "That cover would have been much more fantastic if he had been dressed a la Andre french vogue. Oh Anna, Anna, Anna." Our take: Lebron probably exercises more influence over footwear and apparel sales than Anna Wintour and Gisele and Karl Lagerfeld combined. If Vogue really wanted to think outside the (heh) box, they'd make over Lebron's mom. [Deadspin]
  • Christian Siriano update: found backers for his clothing line, had a fit meeting with Victoria Beckham yesterday, taping Leno tonight, and is slated for an Ugly Betty cameo. Surely nothing like this could end in anticlimax and obscurity? [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Karl Lagerfeld on the just-opened Chanel Mobile Art pavillion: "It's a building, but also an object at the same time. It's like a sculpture you can walk in." [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Reese Witherspoon is the face of the new U by Ungaro fragrance, being licensed by Avon. Do you care? You so care, don't you. [WWD, sub req'd]

  • Whitney is such a follower! Ms. Port, of The Hills fame, is starting her own clothing line, Eve & A, which will show party and cocktail wear. Her daddy is producing it, natch. Who's her daddy? You know, some rich guy. Why burden yourself with the data? [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Liz Claiborne is still tanking despite the best efforts (and we can only imagine laserlike focus!) of Tim Gunn. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Pacific Sunwear is also suffering. [WSJ]
  • Designer Alice Temperley is preg! [Vogue UK]
  • Fashion illustrator (and husband of designer Isabel) Ruben Toledo on how he started his career: "All I knew is that I wanted to paint and draw and do art and be with Isabel—she is my leading inspiration and muse. And I knew that fashion was absurd." But hey, so's the universe, right? [Fashion Week Daily]
  • I wanna Paul Smith ping-pong table. [Chic Report]
  • And a 10,000-square foot billboard of Djimon Hounsou in his skivvies, oh yes. [Chic Report]
  • Model May Anderson is the latest not-designer to play at design: She's started a denim line called Chicks with Guns. [FabSugar]
  • How to rip hair off your body using common kitchen ingredients! [BellaSugar]
  • Seeing a woman say "May my new curls make her feel choked with jealousy" and "Make him dump her tonight and come home with me" does not make me want to buy hair products. [Sassybella]
  • Indian designer Prashant Verma based his entire fall collection on James Dean movies. [Yahoo]
  • Yeah, we're skeptical that a pair of bike shorts has the power to ensure faster muscle recovery. [Business Week]
]]>
Jezebel-367877 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:30:55 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367877&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Newly-Engaged Daniel Craig Sobs For His Suits ]]> danielcraig.jpg
  • "It's really a crime - it makes me weep every time." Daniel Craig, on having to get his Tom Ford suits dirty while filming James Bond movies. [Vogue UK]
  • Blind item! "Which aging actress was the celebrity guest for a fashion function and made the moves on the company's powerful and handsome - but married - CEO? The company no longer works with her." [Page Six]
  • Looks like ELLE International Creative Director Gilles Bensimon is on the masthead in name only; though Bensimon has historically shot every cover in the history of the American fashion magazine, his services were not needed for its upcoming April and May covers. Incidentally, Bensimon's contract is up come December. Any bets on whether they'll continue to keep him on the payroll? [WWD, 1st item]
  • OMG the designs from this season's Project Runway [Yes, I'll be liveblogging the finale tonight] are up for auction online! [Fashion Week Daily]

  • Gucci: Giving money for playgrounds in New York's Central Park. Think those playgrounds are on the Harlem or the 10021 side? [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Expensive shit alert! The new Louis Vuitton watch retails for between $10,425 and $135,000. Obviously. [Fashon Week Daily]
  • And in no shit news regarding expensive shit, Jezebel girl crush Dana Thomas has concluded that Louboutins are wicked overpriced. [Sassybella]
  • Oh wait, more expensive shit: A Hermes car. Which retails for $2.35 million. [Men.style.com]
  • Speaking of expensive shit, want your child to grow up with a penchant for it? Than read her a children's book chronicling the life of Coco Chanel. [Chic Report]
  • Avril Lavigne the clothing line? No, please. [E!]
  • Take that, Sarko: Donatella Versace with be outfitting Nicolas Sarkozy's ex Cecilia for her wedding this month to Richard Attias. Carla who? [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Isaac Mizrahi: Used to hate beer! But now likes it. [WWD, 6th item]
  • Men's cardigans are supposedly "back." I question making "back" synonymous with "in style." [Telegraph]
  • May we all blame Kate Moss's new boyfriend for her recent fashion misses? Um, ok. [Daily Mail]
  • Avon, Reese Witherspoon and the U.N.: All joining together to help empower women in the third world. No, we're not sure what those three parties really have to do with one another either. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Sure, profits are way down at Liz Claiborne, Inc but fret not: Execs all received cash bonuses at year-end in 2007. [WWD, 1st item]
  • Tommy Hilfiger: Gonna start making its shoes in-house. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Online shoe mueseum! [Chic Report]
]]>
Jezebel-364107 Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364107&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Keith Richards For Louis Vuitton: Old And Leathery ]]> keithrichardsforvuitton.png
  • Keith Richards for Louis Vuitton = Awesome. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Amy Winehouse played a Fendi party in Paris and talked about her mumps onstage before offering some gratitude to, like, someone: "Thanks for asking me to play. Whoever asked me to play." [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Meta Kate Olsen came dressed as Karl Lagerfeld for the Chanel show Friday. [WWD, 4th item]
  • Miss J (Alexander of Top Model) to WaPo fashion critic Robin Givhan on a Nina Ricci model: "She has that hungry walk. She's mad because she's so hungry!" [Off the Runway]
  • Formerly anorexic model Crystal Renn on why a girl's gotta eat: "How can you be happy if you're working out for five hours a day? People want to hire happy models. You need fat to think!" Um, modeling requires thought? [Telegraph]
  • Who is the man who would wear Juicy Couture cologne? [BellaSugar]

  • Sayeth Heidi Klum: "Victoria's Secret should do men's underwear, Seal would love that. Bloomers are just not cool, boxers are all right, but there are so many sexier things we could do for guys." Like, just get 'em naked? [Times of India]
  • Expensive shit alert! The $110,000 purse, only at Bergdorf Goodman. [Chic Report]
  • And on that note, Steve & Barry's (home of Sarah Jessica Parker's "Bitten" line) just received an $197 million loan from GE. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Agyness Deyn is England's best-dressed celeb. [Telegraph]
  • Anna Wintour did not attend the Lanvin show in Paris on Friday. But French TV personality Mlle Agnes did...costumed as Wintour: "Getting through security was mighty speedy." [WWD, 2nd item]
  • The perm is back! [Telegraph]
  • Sean "Diddy" Combs: Helping people every day! Or at least designing scarves to benefit Dress for Success. [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Donna Karan: Helping people every day! Or at least having a garage sale of her old shit in the name of charity. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Helena Christensen: Helping people every day! Or at least auctioning stamps with her kid's pic on them on eBay for charity. [Sassybella]
  • Faced with the coming recession, women are cutting back on their spending habits before men are. [MediaPost]
  • Yay for Lush for no longer using palm oil, since it's wicked bad for the environment. [Guardian]
]]>
Jezebel-362972 Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362972&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Famous Last Words ]]> toryburchflat021808.jpg"They're so identifiable, and I'd rather not wear something that screams what it is." —Tory Burch, the designer responsible for the very identifiable Reva ballet flats, discussing trendy, "it" apparel and accessories in the March issue of Harper's Bazaar.

]]>
Jezebel-357481 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:40:00 EST Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357481&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lauren Conrad Collection: Ugly, Overpriced, Simply Outrageous ]]> laurenconrad0213.jpgOnce again, Lauren Conrad "triumphs" over Heidi Montag. While Heidi's "working" in fashion as the "face" of Anchor Blue (for the more "mature" slutty tween!), Lauren is actually "designing" her own clothes. Only her designs are a little...meh. Ok, they're actually a lot "meh": The Spring 2008 looks of the Lauren Conrad Collection is nothing more than idiotic jersey pieces, that retail for up to $170 dollars. Not only that, but the cuts seem super weird, and the palette is heavy on doody colors. LC did, however, name two looks after gal pals Whitney Port and Audrina Partridge! After the jump, behold the full Lauren Conrad Spring/Summer 2008 collection. And try not to throw things at your monitor in outrage when you do.

L to R: Katherine wrap, $140; Jackie tube top, $42; Leggings, $48 / Jillian dress, $145 / Maura top, $85
laurenconrad1.gif
Verdict: I like to wear leggings around my apartment. But even I wouldn't match them with a tube top; Why wear a burlap sack when you can wear a jersey sack? If your milkshake doesn't bring all the boys to the yard, you can always just show them your boobs.

L to R: Sophia dress, $145; London top, $100; Audrina dress, $150
laurenconrad2.gif
Verdict: So when are you due? What? You're not pregnant? Sorry; Nouveau Flashdance; The poor man's Rami Kashou!

L to R: Britton top, $94; Bree tank, $75; Nicole skirt, $85
laurenconrad3.gif
Verdict: How Contempo Casuals ca. 1993; Seriously, you can buy this but nicer at Target. Words I never thought I would say: A cheaper Amy Winehouse.

L to R: Whitney dress, $170; Natonia dresss, $150
laurenconrad4.gif
Verdict: LC must not like Whitney very much as this is by far the ugliest look of the lot; This is probably your best bet of all the pieces, even though it cannot be worn by those with actual breasts.

]]>
Jezebel-356001 Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:20:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nothing Says "Maturity" Quite Like Heidi Montag ]]> heidimontag0213.jpg
  • Clothing line Anchor Blue has signed Heidi Montag to be its new face. Because execs want to appeal to a "slightly older" demographic. No, really. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Would you like to be Erin O'Connor's escort to a show during London Fashion Week? Well lucky for you she's holding a contest with Vogue UK. To win her hand (or, you know, the seat next to her) all you have to do is compose her a poem. Start work-shopping those dirty limericks here! [Vogue UK]
  • Thrilling/disturbing news: Steve & Barry's has inked a licensing deal allowing them to create and sell t-shirts bearing images and logos from The Little Rascals, The Andy Griffith Show, The Beverly Hillbillies, The Brady Bunch, The Love Boat, The Twilight Zone, Happy Days, Laverne & Shirley, Cheers and Beverly Hills 90210. And if you feel a twinge of sadness that the average Steve & Barry's customer has probably never known the joy of watching an episode of Laverne & Shirley, just think of the poor children in China who will be sewing them. [WWD, sub req'd]

  • So the family of the actual Ossie Clark, whose namesake label was just revived during the opening of London Fashion Week, says they never gave anyone permission to use the house's name. And are now taking legal action. Awkward. [WWD, 4th item]
  • Talk about expensive shit! Remember those Van Cleef & Arpels-Earnest Sewn jeans we told you about? They retail for between $9,700 and $11,300. Also, they are fug. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • "I couldn't fit into my [Bill] Blass sample. I guess it's because I'm not an 18-year-old Russian." Socialite Plum Sykes: just like us! [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Ooh la la: Heidi Klum and Seal on the cover of French ELLE! [Sassybella]
  • Alessandra Gucci (daughter of dead Maurizio) is launching her own accessories line under the label AG, since the Gucci clan won't let any of its usurping-relatives use the family name to promote their own half-wit businesses. But Alessandra's business sounds less half-wit than most: It's all alligator handbags in pretty colors. And the girl does have a degree in economics, so good for her? [WWD, 2nd item]
  • Perry Ellis revenues are down. Insert instinctual defensive remark about the halycon days of Marc Jacobs and his grunge collection. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Jones Apparel also doing not so good. That's a recession for you, folks! [Reuters]
  • Liz Claiborne is thisclose to selling off Ellen Tracy to (who else) a private equity firm. The sale will fetch $50 million, which...seems kind of low, albeit to someone who will never see that kind of cash ever. [NY Post]
]]>
Jezebel-355919 Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=355919&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ They All Fall Down: Kirsten Dunst, Pretty Models Make Pointed Poses ]]> Kirstenmiumiusmall.jpgThe fashion industry has always been, in part, about selling expensive shit to women in the form of female submission (corsets, stiletto heels, etc.). But there seem to be more submissives than normal in the ads of the major American fashion magazines this month, specifically, models and actresses in the sort of awkward, recumbent poses defined by academics as "arrogant, slightly insolent" expressions meant to induce status anxiety in consumers. We asked Mark Duffy, the dude behind the blog Copyranter for his opinion, and he gave a somewhat different take. "The advertisers want the ads to look inviting, so the models are put in subservient positions, so as not to intimidate readers," he told us. "Also, such positions also serve as a 'pointer' (arrow) to the products." So which is it? Are such ads inviting or intimidating? Take a look at the offending ads after the jump and weigh in.



(Click on any image to enlarge)

Miu Miu
Kirstenmiumiusmall.jpg

Louis Vuitton
louisvuittonsmall.jpg

Valentino
Valentinospreadsmall.jpg

Reem Acra
ReemAcrasmall.jpg

Furla
Furlasmall.jpg

Marc Jacobs
DaisyMarcJacobssmall.jpg

Prada
Pradaspreadsmall.jpg

Visual Persuasion: The Role Of Images In Advertising [Google Books]
Related: a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/">The Copyranter
Paul Messaris [University of Pennsylvania]

]]>
Jezebel-349887 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:00:00 EST Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349887&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "It Shoes" Are Apparently The New "It Bags" ]]> pradashoe.pngKnow how all sorts of fashion types are screaming from the rooftops about the death of the It Bag? Did you believe them? Cause if you did, well, then keep dreaming: Rising from the ashes of the It Bag is the It Shoe! (Even Miuccia Prada says so, and whatever she says goes.) "The obsession with handbags has finished a little now. It feels over. It's about shoes now," says Prada. Adds Michael Lewis, head of design for Kurt Geiger: "For women, shoes are still about fantasy and dressing up — shoes can make you feel something special in a way a bag really can't. Shoes can give you a different persona." Shoes, of course, also give you bloody heels, hammertoes, bunions and collapsed arches — which leaves us wondering what it all really means.



Says handbag designer Orla Keily: "Looking forward, I think the whole idea of it-anything will be questioned, Whether it's a bag or a shoe, do you really have to have this thing at all? And what about making a personal choice, rather than one that's been dictated to you?" Well fashion is never about need; it's about want. And there will always be a new objet being shilled by the fashion industry, something designed to stir desire in consumers worldwide and simply sell more expensive shit. Expensive shit that everyone else already has.

But if it shoes are the new it bags, we may as well check 'em out: Do you love or loathe the Spring 2008 Prada shoes? After all, if you can't beat 'em...
pradashoes1.gif
pradashoes2.gif
pradashoes3.gif

Make Way For The It Shoe [Independent]

Earlier: Fashion Blogger Announces That "It" Bags Are (Finally) Dead

]]>
Jezebel-349755 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:00:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349755&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Valentino's Big Goodbye Won't Be A Weepy One ]]> valentino0904.png
  • Valentino on his final collection, showing tomorrow in Paris: "It's a happy collection. It's not a collection with tears in between." Right, because then it would be a bipolar collection, and at 12 minutes or so that's a lot for any audience to take. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • And in other last-Valentino-show-ever news, the designer included a portrait of himself in the invitation to tomorrow's show and also posed for pictures with every one of the seamstresses who helped create the collection so they could each have a keepsake of him. Aw? [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Volvo created a new ad that for release in Switzerland [Wait, Switzerland is a big enough market to warrant its very own ads? Okay. -Moe] that shows its newest hatchback model being surrounded by Karl-look-a-likes snapping its photo. The real Karl: not amused! "They think I should be flattered, perhaps. It's not the chicest car I am promoting — without knowing I did it." Snap. [WWD, 3rd item]

  • Abercrombie and Fitch's new underwear line Gilly Hicks: sells "underwear, not lingerie," with products that are "more boyish than boudoir," and it fancies itself as the anti-Victoria's Secret. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • St. John CEO Glenn McMahon on his outlook for the upcoming year: "[E]verybody is very nervous about 2008." Now there's a feel-good attitude we can get behind! [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Ellen Pompeo: "I love to aspire to be on the worst-dressed list!" [Fashion Week Daily]
  • ELLE UK appoints Chloe Sevigny as "style adviser." Oy. [Guardian]
  • Project Runway alum Malan Breton: still designing! [Chic Report]
  • Oh Jesus, why is Madonna doing commercials for Sunsilk hair care products? Because there's a recession on and that $100 million LiveNation contract might not be enough to scrape by? [Sassybella]
  • 15-year old Russian designer Kira Plastinina on her target market: "[P]retty much girls like me. They're 14 to 25 years old. They're active, they're — I don't know, cool. Like normal teenage girls, I guess." Suddenly we feel depressed. [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Fashion line Chikara was created specifically for women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer. Suddenly, we feel somewhat redeemed. [WWD, sub req'd]
]]>
Jezebel-347525 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=347525&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rich Chicks Not Afraid To Shop Among Commoners ]]> ysl010608.jpgYou may think that if you had more money, you'd buy nicer stuff. But ladies with cash still love a bargain, according to the National Retail Federation. Women with a household income of over $100,000 admit to shopping at Bergdorf Goodman, Neiman Marcus, Saks and — surprise! — Target. According to a survey, 11% of them also go to Wal-Mart. (Just because it's inexpensive doesn't mean it's beneath them!) Over 70% of women with incomes over $150,000 say that price does not make a brand. Robin Lewis, a retail expert, says ladies raking in the dough "will pay for something if they really want it. "But they won't pay a penny more than what they can see it is worth." In other words, they may be materialistic, but they're not stupid.



But is this kind of "anything goes" shopping really shocking? Even if you do have loads of money, not everything you need can be found at Neiman Marcus. Target has swept the nation with kooky ad campaigns and quality products, but in a world of $26,000 handbags, aren't all women just thankful the so-called "discount" stores like Target, Kmart and Wal-Mart carry items that are priced realistically?

High-Income Women Covet Luxury, Still Eye Bargains [Reuters]

]]>
Jezebel-345499 Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:30:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345499&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kiki For Miu Miu: We're Not Buying It ]]> kristendunstmiumiuads.png
  • Kirsten Dunst looks almost as evil in these Miu Miu ads as we somehow believe she actually is. [Sassybella]
  • The latest ads for British lingerie label Agent Provocateur features model Vahina Giocante playing "a bored housewife drawn into a love affair with a reform school tomboy." Um, based on this image, she doesn't look so tomboyish to us! [Vogue UK]
  • First no black models, now no black customers: ck Calvin Klein Beauty Collection cosmetics for Caucasians only. [BellaSugar]
  • This is what diplomatic disputes look like in Western Europe: The mayor of Paris v. H&M [WWD, sub req'd]
  • Donna Karan: Still trying to cure cancer through yoga with her Urban Zen initiative. [NYMag]

  • Ooh, images from the Jovovich-Hawk for Target line. Yeaaaah, jury's still out. [Sassybella]
  • Elle fashion director/ em>Project Runway judge Nina Garcia is no stranger to shilling for Blackberry, but now she's shilling a pink Blackberry. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • This year, the Make-A-Wish Foundation fulfilled the dreams of a teenage girl named Yali, who had always longed to collaborate with Kate Spade in designing a handbag. "This was the most inspirational and gratifying experience of my life," says Yali. Um, so how's Yali holding up? What's her affliction? What's the prognosis? Yeah, they don't say. But Kate Spade ooh! [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Diane von Furstenberg is now designing shoes. "My shoes are not just pretty accessories; they are functional and serve a purpose." Shoes? A purpose other than retail therapy? Shock. [Fashion Week Daily]
  • Here's a handy place to hide your ill-gotten subprime mortgage hedge fund gains: a $18,000 belt. [UPI]
  • Alexandre de Paris, Elizabeth Taylor's favorite hairstylist, passed away over the weekend at the age of 85. [Independent]
]]>
Jezebel-344451 Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:30:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=344451&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Expensive Shit ]]> warriorbag.jpgOh, the things we fantasize about when we play the game "If I Had All The Money In The World"! Going crazy at Whole Foods! One thing that's never made it into our bubble of thought, though, is the $26,000 handbag. Which is exactly what the Burberry "Warrior" bag is. Well, that, and downright retarded. [Independent]

]]>
Jezebel-342810 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342810&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ An $883 Rice Cooker Is Not A "Feminist Victory" ]]> I don't know who Laura Vanderkam is, but she apparently wrote something called Grindhopping: Build a Rewarding Career without Paying Your Dues and now today she is here on the Huffington Post extolling the virtues of an $883 rice cooker, and leave it to me to make the obvious point, "Leave it to someone who hasn't paid any motherfucking DUES to want an $883 motherfucking RICE COOKER!!" but I as I read the following paragraph I found myself positively aching for a certain unforgivably overpriced kitchen luxury of my own.

Like many modern women, I rarely have to cook. So kitchen time becomes a choice, a matter of self-expression rather than drudgery. Which makes all the gadgets fun. That may not have been the first thing our feminist foremothers were fighting for, but it's a more important victory than most of us realize.
Dude, and I say this in reckless disregard of the Spirit Of Christmas(TM) but sweetie-pie, to think it is legitimate to call a grossly-overpriced consumer product a "vehicle for self-expression" actually pretty much a defeat. (Also, $886 to cook rice?)

Anyway, I love rice as much as anyone. And I love kitchens. I even sort of like cooking, and occasionally I even like buying things. But when it comes to "expression," words and art and gestures and time put in — like say, the number of labor hours it might cost to pay off an $886 rice cooker — carry a lot more meaning, and a potentially much bigger victory, than some mass-produced appliance, even one that comes from Japan.

So yeah, don't buy into this "self-expression" crap and take it easy and don't just throw your money at useless shit like I inevitably will this weekend.

Finding Joy In An $883 Rice Cooker [Huffington Post]

]]>
Jezebel-337014 Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:00:36 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337014&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Expensive Shit ]]> swarovskitoilet1219.pngTalk about literal expensive shit! This toilet is encrusted in Swarovski crystals. It costs $75,000. Naturally, it was created by an artist in that mecca of understatedness and sophistication: Hollywood, Florida. [Fashion Week Daily]

]]>
Jezebel-335669 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:20:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335669&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Vanity Fair</i>'s Gift Guide: MasterCard, MasterCard Or MasterCard? ]]> vfgiftfinder1.pngVanity Fair, taking a page out of the teen magazines we all loved so dearly, has created a quiz of sorts on their Vanity Fair Insider website to allow readers to see the perfect gift for everyone on their holiday shopping lists. Visitors are asked to set sliding scale thingies to denote the gender of the recipient (does halfway mean that your gift-receiving sweetheart is a transsexual? a transvestite?), whether the recipient is more classic or more modern, whether the gift should be tech-based or not, and whether it should be "modest" or a "splurge," amongst other categories. I created as many different combinations for made-up friends and lovers in my life as possible but, no matter what I did, the ubiquitous MasterCard gift card was offered up as a suggestion. My adventures with the Vanity Fair gift finder, after the jump.



First I created an imaginary boyfriend who is modern, likes gadgets, and would appreciate a modest yet personal gift. I had no idea that a MasterCard gift card (below) would meet said imaginary boyfriend's needs.