@Norton: Usually they aren't. I agree that if cows are being slaughtered for meat that we should go ahead and use all of their body parts. But most of the time, cows are only used for what they're bred to produce (meat, leather products, milk, etc.)
@Norton: Cows don't need to be slaughtered for meat. Red meat is unhealthy for both people and the environment, and it is incredibly difficult to find organic, free-range beef (or other cow products.) The reason is that most beef comes from American and Australian slaughterhouses--- they are the world's largest exporters (source: [www.fas.usda.gov]).
Even if you're not a vegetarian/vegan, there are other, healthier and more socially-responsible forms of meat (such as non-endangered fish and free-range poultry. They still aren't animal-friendly, since meat never is--- but at least they don't support beef slaughterhouses or generate the same level of greenhouse gases.) Red meat should be avoided at all costs.
Buying and making leather-wear just supports the industry. Recycled leather might be better, but that isn't what they are using.
@roxythekiller: Doesn't have to be cow. It could be goat or sheep or... yeah, pretty much any mammal.
Anyway, in regard to all this beef v no beef business... are we REALLY judging what those in a nation continually tormented by poverty and famine are eating? Really?
The US and Australia have done enough damage to animals and the environment with beef-production. I'm a proud US citizen in every sense of the word, but I'm not proud of this tradition. Ethiopia must not cultivate this kind of destruction... it's a step in the wrong direction, if they hope to set trends for socially responsible business.
@roxythekiller: I don't know if you're seeing my point. This business in no way relies on American or Australian slaughterhouses, but is sourced locally. Since beef is already being eaten (it is a large part of Ethiopian cuisine), would you still consider it unethical to use leather IF that leather was coming from local animals that had been slaughtered for food?
Also, they are not solely (hah!) using leather - they are also using tires and other material. But I don't know how available these other leather alternatives are there.
@roxythekiller: Wait wait wait. You have to be careful when talking about beef-raising in other countries, though. I studied pastoralism for most of my time in Tanzania, and its a way of life that developed *because* of the arid and semi-arid rangeland (ASAL) ecology. It actually functions perfectly well...and I know at least southern Ethiopia has large rangelands with a pastoralist tradition.
We have this intense anti-pastoralist mentality as US environmentalists because of things like "The Tragedy of the Commons," which, while seminal, doesn't account for societies with different notions of communal land use in which socio-cultural systems evolved to work with the landscape rather than against. While I have mixed feelings about government and NGO priorities in promoting pastoralism in SSA, there's no denying that it works, and that it's a tremendously better alternative than traditional agriculture -- which is not suited for the ASAL in the first place and breaks up wildlife migration corridors, affecting the whole ecosystem in a tremendously negative way.
@roxythekiller: I could be wrong, but I know beef is historically and culturally a significant part of the Ethiopian diet.
Given the relative lack of industrial infrastructure, I'd be very surprised if Ethiopians are eating factory-farmed beef-- I'm guessing most is from small farmers, and is essentially free-range.
Also, given the following sober statistics, I think it's really naive and culturally insensitive to push vegan/vegetarianism on Ethiopia right now:
"...the federal Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) has announced that rising malnutrition and food insecurity were a growing concern and likely to lead to 6.2 million Ethiopians relying on food aid, out of a population of approximately 77 million.
At present, 4.9 million people in the country benefit from relief food.
According to the DRMFSS, the country has a shortfall of 176,000T of food. However, this is likely to increase to 390,000T in the months up to December 2009. " [www.irinnews.org]
@LaComtesse: Seriously. Criticizing Ethiopians for seeking out a food source and most likely then using the hides for shoes is really...low. From a purely practical standpoint I can't even think what the alternative would be. Set up a factory so that they can produce plastics (and noxious fumes using dangerous chemicals) to avoid using readily available leather? Hm, I think not.
@Norton: Famine can be reduced if the land and resources used for cows is instead used for crops and people. I'm not sure how much beef Ethiopia produces, but growth of the beef trade means more animals that need to be fed with crops that can be used to feed people instead.
Beef is a part of many "traditional" diets, but traditions are not static. They change as people change, otherwise we would all be living in the stone age. Reducing beef intake is always an option.
@formergr: Relief food does not need to be meat, and it easpecially does not need to be beef. Sure, beggars can't be choosers--- but that does not mean we should give them unhealthy and environmentally destructive food when there are alterntives. It also doesn't mean we should encourage destructive industries from growing in their land.
It takes more resources and more crops to produce beef than it does to produce any other kind of meat or crop. Beef also does more environmental damage than other meats and crops.
@formergr: Cows are how a lot of pastoralist and otherwise cattle-keeping societies get through the dry season. Milk mixed with blood. Yup. And you sell a cow or a few to slaughter if you need to send your kid to school. Or just eat the meat yourself.
I really can't believe that people are debating the ethics of eating beef in sub-Saharan Africa. I mean seriously, go there. Seriously.
@LaFemme: I never suggested plastic. Recycling tires is a good alternative, and the company is already doing this. Now they just need to stop using leather, as soon as it is financially possible.
What's low is assuming that just because Ethiopians are starving that we should encourage them to engage in destructive meat-producing and consuming practices.
@BlueJeans: From what you have told me, there is a different between pastorialism and slaughterhouses. However, cows need food. Where does the food come from?
Currently, one third of the world's grain is fed to livestock. The US is a world leader in this, with so much grain that it exports it to other countries... feeding cows rather than hungry people.
@hassibah: @LaFemme: Thanks. I have zero problem from hearing someone make very valid points about the beef industry in the land of plentiful boca burgers and tofu dogs. It’s completely invalid and otherwise inappropriate when talking about a place like Ethiopia.
@roxythekiller: There's a difference between pastoralism and *feed lots.* Slaughterhouses, or abattoirs, are being built to make slaughter more efficient in a lot of rangeland areas in order to increase profitability per head of cattle for the pastoralists selling them.
And as I said: grazing. Hence, rangelands. A lot of the issues that make large-scale beef production an environmental issue in the US are completely inapplicable in east Africa.
@roxythekiller: Are being purposely obtuse?? I never said relief food had to be beef, I was merely quoting statistics from an article on the rather dire food scarcity situation that currently ongoing in Ethiopia, and it happened to include information on relief efforts.
If you want, I can find other sources of supporting data that are less confusing to backup my claim that it's incredibly insensitive to push veganism/vegetarianism on a country where a great many people are undernourished or starving.
"Africa's second most populous country after Nigeria, with nearly 80 million inhabitants, Ethiopia is also one of the continent's poorest nations, with bouts of drought, famine, the overthrow of a junta in 1991 and a bloody border war with Eritrea in the 1990s that left 80,000 dead exacerbating economic woes."
'Nuff said. I'm a vegetarian, but in my heart, cows come second to people. If I'm starving, I will eat that high horse that PETA is riding in on.
@LaComtesse: Thanks for adding some much needed perspective. It's easy for us to sit on our fat western asses and tell these people how to run their lives. Because we do such a good job ourselves. I will respect them enough to assume that they are capable of making ethical and business decisions on their own and pray for their success.
@roxythekiller: This post is not the place to flog your cause. Talking about meat and leather production practices in industrialized nations, and willfully ignoring when commenters attempt to steer the discussion back to practices in Ethiopia is not okay here.
@bitingfairy: I tell people how to live their lives all the time, but I think it's a bit much to insist that Ethiopians follow Western ideas about the treatment of animals. They don't have the luxury of ensuring that their livestock gets to travel and has a good childhood, when they can't even give that to their own HUMAN children.
@formergr: Are you purposedly being rude?
I'm not "pushing" anything except compassion--- killing animals is not a "must", and it is insensitive to people and humans to assume it is.
Leather has become a big business in Ethiopia, and a lot of it is sold abroad as a luxury good. These shoes, mostly sandals and flip-flops, retail for a cushy $20-$60 in the US. The lowest is a sandal retailing for 11.60, which makes me wonder how this company will keep up leather supply-and-demand if it grows. Chances are, as demand for cow-skin grows, the way the animals are kept worsens. More cows, less space, more profit.
Ethiopian leather is advertised as "friendly" because cows are allegedly allowed to roam around a bit before they are killed... yet that doesn't change the fact that cows are still killed, and that people are forced to kill cows without many alternatives. If you care about peoples' rights, ask yourself why their industries are so limited in the first place? Shouldn't people have the right not to kill animals in order to send their kid to school?
There are alternatives to beef just like there are alternatives to leather--- they are both unnecessary cruelty. It is sad that Ethiopia's business model is so dependent on this commodity. This shoe business can change that by encouraging other, more compassionate local industries, instead of this single destructive one. There is no excuse for perpetuating this cruelty when there are alternatives. #solerebels
@topsy: Because not all Ethiopians think the same, and there is a lack of animal rights legislation in their country? People who live in Ethiopia ultimately decide what happens in their country, but if US and European history have taught us anything, it's that being nativist and refusing to listen to "outsider" viewpoints is a bad idea--- and just leads to "us" vs "them" prejudices. #solerebels
@Hana Maru: Please reread my comments. All my comments have mentioned Ethiopia, and why it is a bad idea for this company to support the growth of a cruel and unnecessary "luxury" industry. #solerebels
@BlueJeans: There is a difference between Pastoralism and slaughterhouses, but both kill animals when animals do not need to be killed. Ethiopian meat-farmers are not sticking to Pastoralism, but looking for ways to increase meat production. Many even consider "ranching" a form of modernity, and want to head in that direction.
The reason that a lot of "grazing land" exists in Ethiopia is due to environmental damage and land mismanagement. The huge outside demand for Ethiopian leather goods contributes to this, which is why Ethiopia doublted livestock exports in 2009. They have also created the "Ethiopian Meat and Dairy Technology Institute," which exists to create "modern" dairy farming--- to create more cows. [source: [www.ethiopianreview.com]]
This shoe company only states the leather comes from a local source, not that that local sources is free of the animal abuse found in ranching. #solerebels
What I find most upsetting is not access to abortion--she has the legal right to an abortion but in country that lacks the resources to provide it upon demand--but that she was raped and her perpetrator was not punished. This girl would not have been in this position had she not been raped! F the conversation about access to contraceptives in her case because that would not have prevented her attacker from raping her.
Yet another reason why I support abortion rights. In such an impoverished place, having babies brings no good to young women who are shunned already. Population control solves so many problems. There are just too many people having kids they can't support. Sigh.
@Samanthrax is Sarcastic: I say it is, and this is not an argument for eugenics, as I'm sure some may take it. Women should have easy access to contraception and pregnancy termination everywhere- especially in places like Africa, where there is too much hunger, unemployment, and disease. The same can be said for cities in America, too. Babies should not be born to unwilling mothers who can't support them.
@Samanthrax is Sarcastic: thanks, let me echo your sentiment, and add that "having babies brings no good" is probably something for the mothers of those babies to speak to, not for us to decide for them. Safe abortion access is critical, as is being supportive of struggling women who choose to have babies.
@graciousplum: Babies not being born to unwilling mothers is not the same as population control. And there are a lot of things that should happen, but don't.
@Samanthrax is Sarcastic: EXACTLY. In an impoverished area, the larger your family is, the more recources you may have. I am not in any way saying that women should have babies for that reason, but I also get a chill when I hear the term "population control." Fuck many pro-lifers see abortion as population control.....so identifying abortion with population control in any country makes me extremely uncomfortable.
@graciousplum: I think the phrase population control does not typically have the meaning which you are using. I don't think offering access to safe and affordable abortion services is the same thing as population control.
Safe abortion is what is key. A desperate woman will find a way to have an abortion. It's high time the government wrapped their brains around that and made abortion legal and safe.
I saw a fetus reference up there somewhere, and I've been dying to ask this...Can we switch the spelling to the antique version?? Please???? Because "foetus" is SOOOO much better!!!!
FOETUS!! FOETUS!! FOETUS!! yeaaaaaa!!! Say it! Yall know you want to!!!!!!!!!
10/14/09
10/14/09
If so, that sounds fairly accurate.
10/14/09
10/14/09
Cows shouldn't need to be slaughtered when there are so many great alternatives to leather.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Even if you're not a vegetarian/vegan, there are other, healthier and more socially-responsible forms of meat (such as non-endangered fish and free-range poultry. They still aren't animal-friendly, since meat never is--- but at least they don't support beef slaughterhouses or generate the same level of greenhouse gases.) Red meat should be avoided at all costs.
Buying and making leather-wear just supports the industry. Recycled leather might be better, but that isn't what they are using.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Anyway, in regard to all this beef v no beef business... are we REALLY judging what those in a nation continually tormented by poverty and famine are eating? Really?
10/14/09
The US and Australia have done enough damage to animals and the environment with beef-production. I'm a proud US citizen in every sense of the word, but I'm not proud of this tradition. Ethiopia must not cultivate this kind of destruction... it's a step in the wrong direction, if they hope to set trends for socially responsible business.
10/14/09
Also, they are not solely (hah!) using leather - they are also using tires and other material. But I don't know how available these other leather alternatives are there.
10/14/09
We have this intense anti-pastoralist mentality as US environmentalists because of things like "The Tragedy of the Commons," which, while seminal, doesn't account for societies with different notions of communal land use in which socio-cultural systems evolved to work with the landscape rather than against. While I have mixed feelings about government and NGO priorities in promoting pastoralism in SSA, there's no denying that it works, and that it's a tremendously better alternative than traditional agriculture -- which is not suited for the ASAL in the first place and breaks up wildlife migration corridors, affecting the whole ecosystem in a tremendously negative way.
Pastoralism FTW.
10/14/09
Ethiopia is also one of the continent's poorest nations, with bouts of ... famine
10/14/09
Given the relative lack of industrial infrastructure, I'd be very surprised if Ethiopians are eating factory-farmed beef-- I'm guessing most is from small farmers, and is essentially free-range.
Also, given the following sober statistics, I think it's really naive and culturally insensitive to push vegan/vegetarianism on Ethiopia right now:
"...the federal Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) has announced that rising malnutrition and food insecurity were a growing concern and likely to lead to 6.2 million Ethiopians relying on food aid, out of a population of approximately 77 million.
At present, 4.9 million people in the country benefit from relief food.
According to the DRMFSS, the country has a shortfall of 176,000T of food. However, this is likely to increase to 390,000T in the months up to December 2009. "
[www.irinnews.org]
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Beef is a part of many "traditional" diets, but traditions are not static. They change as people change, otherwise we would all be living in the stone age. Reducing beef intake is always an option.
10/14/09
It takes more resources and more crops to produce beef than it does to produce any other kind of meat or crop. Beef also does more environmental damage than other meats and crops.
10/14/09
I really can't believe that people are debating the ethics of eating beef in sub-Saharan Africa. I mean seriously, go there. Seriously.
10/14/09
What's low is assuming that just because Ethiopians are starving that we should encourage them to engage in destructive meat-producing and consuming practices.
10/14/09
Currently, one third of the world's grain is fed to livestock. The US is a world leader in this, with so much grain that it exports it to other countries... feeding cows rather than hungry people.
10/14/09
10/14/09
And as I said: grazing. Hence, rangelands. A lot of the issues that make large-scale beef production an environmental issue in the US are completely inapplicable in east Africa.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
If you want, I can find other sources of supporting data that are less confusing to backup my claim that it's incredibly insensitive to push veganism/vegetarianism on a country where a great many people are undernourished or starving.
10/14/09
"Africa's second most populous country after Nigeria, with nearly 80 million inhabitants, Ethiopia is also one of the continent's poorest nations, with bouts of drought, famine, the overthrow of a junta in 1991 and a bloody border war with Eritrea in the 1990s that left 80,000 dead exacerbating economic woes."
'Nuff said. I'm a vegetarian, but in my heart, cows come second to people. If I'm starving, I will eat that high horse that PETA is riding in on.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/22/09
I'm not "pushing" anything except compassion--- killing animals is not a "must", and it is insensitive to people and humans to assume it is.
Leather has become a big business in Ethiopia, and a lot of it is sold abroad as a luxury good. These shoes, mostly sandals and flip-flops, retail for a cushy $20-$60 in the US. The lowest is a sandal retailing for 11.60, which makes me wonder how this company will keep up leather supply-and-demand if it grows. Chances are, as demand for cow-skin grows, the way the animals are kept worsens. More cows, less space, more profit.
Ethiopian leather is advertised as "friendly" because cows are allegedly allowed to roam around a bit before they are killed... yet that doesn't change the fact that cows are still killed, and that people are forced to kill cows without many alternatives. If you care about peoples' rights, ask yourself why their industries are so limited in the first place? Shouldn't people have the right not to kill animals in order to send their kid to school?
There are alternatives to beef just like there are alternatives to leather--- they are both unnecessary cruelty. It is sad that Ethiopia's business model is so dependent on this commodity. This shoe business can change that by encouraging other, more compassionate local industries, instead of this single destructive one. There is no excuse for perpetuating this cruelty when there are alternatives. #solerebels
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/22/09
The reason that a lot of "grazing land" exists in Ethiopia is due to environmental damage and land mismanagement. The huge outside demand for Ethiopian leather goods contributes to this, which is why Ethiopia doublted livestock exports in 2009. They have also created the "Ethiopian Meat and Dairy Technology Institute," which exists to create "modern" dairy farming--- to create more cows. [source: [www.ethiopianreview.com]]
This shoe company only states the leather comes from a local source, not that that local sources is free of the animal abuse found in ranching. #solerebels
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
04/20/09
This girl would not have been in this position had she not been raped! F the conversation about access to contraceptives in her case because that would not have prevented her attacker from raping her.
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
(Totally not saying that sympathy for Rubina Ali is unjustified or wrong, I'm just saying...)
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
sorry.
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
FOETUS!! FOETUS!! FOETUS!! yeaaaaaa!!! Say it! Yall know you want to!!!!!!!!!