Sadly, even trying to stay safe and taking every precaution will not always prevent an abduction, rape, or other crime. But maybe there was no crime and Annie will be found safe and sound.
@KiddyKat: There's no suspicion of foul play and (despite my first thoughts going to domestic) her fiance is fully involved. But our city can be scary in places, especially the area she disappeared from. I just hope everything turns out ok. I know the police have been in overdrive since Wednesday.
Her coach says she's "not feeling well."
No shit. I wonder if you can feel well when everybody is wondering about your sex, making nasty comments about it and questioning if you deserved your win.
Edited by IBleedGlitter: The High Priestess of Tinsel at 09/11/09 5:42 PM
IBleedGlitter: The High Priestess of Tinsel was starred
IBleedGlitter: The High Priestess of Tinsel was unstarred
@boobookitteh: Oh my god, how is that possible? The Met is my favorite place, ever, so I'm very biased, but you should definitely go! I was thinking about going tonight for a glass of wine and art, but it's getting to be too late.
@IBleedGlitter: The High Priestess of Tinsel: There's a whole iTunesU podcast available for free about this painting, if you want to cram before going.
@dirtybee:
Not only that, but to do all of those things with the particular kind of cancer she has? I don't even like to leave the comfort of my own bathroom when things get crazy down there.
I am so thrilled about this I could cry. Not only for the huge potential it has, but also for what it means about this administration's attitudes towards science. This is on a par with acknowledging that atheists are American too in Obama's inaugural speech.
This is so great. My husband and I wanted to donate our leftovers to stem cell research but at the time we discussed it with our doctor, it wasn't allowed. Probably won't have any to donate now, but I'm very happy it's finally an option.
No! We can't do this! Now we're treating a cluster of cells like . . . a cluster of cells. And we can't have that. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN LIFE MUST ALWAYS TRUMP ACTUAL HUMAN LIFE!
@PrarieMuffin: This argument has always intrigued me. What about semen? No one ever seems to get up in arms about mansauce when it comes to "potential for life"
@spunkay doesn't have a middle name: Well technically no one is talking about eggs this way either. It's only when they're fertilized that anyone gives a crap about them.
@spunkay doesn't have a middle name: Some people do think it is a sin to spill semen on the earth, aka, waste semen, aka masturbation or any sex that is not intended to result in a pregnancy.
"Freely given by a well-informed donor": Wait, you mean women can make a rational, informed choice where SNOWFLAKE BEHBEHS are concerned? OMG call the press!!!
@pax: An embryo means a man was involved too and the man usually also has a say over what happens to embryos left over from IVF (if it isn't an anonymous sperm donor).
Its things like this that kind of disturb me about in-vitro and the whole infertility big business. I don't begrudge people the children they so badly want but I can't help feeling that the creation of life this way ends up treating humans cavalierly. That women harm their bodies and suffer emotionally to achieve a biological child. I feel like if so much value wasn't placed on that then women wouldn't be willing to go to such extremes and we wouldn't have to wonder about what to do with frozen embryos that no longer hold any value to the people so willing to create them. I'm not faulting anyone who goes this route, I just feel like we accept it as a way of way of life now and I'm not so comfortable with that.
@RubyPenelope: I feel the same. I don't fault the individuals who pursue this route, but nonetheless it has never made sense to me. If I decided to have children and found that I was infertile, the first thought in my head would be adoption - but that's because my family has first-hand experience with adoption so it's very ordinary to me. My dad was adopted, so I don't share DNA with his parents, but that didn't make them any less my grandparents, or him any less their child. DNA is just a genetic lottery - it's a lifetime caring for a child that makes them yours. I really wish we would invest half the money that goes into reproductive medicine and crazy fertility treatments into making adoption affordable and feasible for more families.
@Deaf Mute: The reason I've seen cited a few places (I've done research into egg donation, as a donator cause I'm poor and I'm more than happy to help people have kids) is the idea of accidental incest. That if someone else adopts their embryos, their children might one day encounter this individual who is their genetic sibling and totally hit it off and they have to find out that it's an incestuous relationship and that's icky.
@RustyHeadedGirl thinks everything just tasted purple for a ...: I think for a lot of people it is less the fear of accidental incest and more the feeling of having a child out there and not knowing anything about it, or even knowing if it exists. The egg might result in a pregnancy, might not, but you wouldn't be informed either way. So you would always be looking at people with kids and wondering. I wouldn't want that in the least.
And donating it to research is a way to contribute to life saving medicine.
@Deaf Mute: My honest, and unkind, opinion is that people who are so invested in the idea of a biological child to perpetuate their DNA see their genetic material as so special and proprietary that they couldn't bear to have a child born of that DNA raised by someone else. But then, as I come from a family where adoption is openly talked about (my dad was adopted), I have never understood the burning desire to go to extraordinary lengths to have a child composed of one's own DNA if there is any possibility of adopting instead. (I do realize that adoption has its own issues and expenses, and is becoming increasingly difficult.)
Wait - I bet all the women who assholed around outside of Dr. Tiller's clinic the other day would be glad to donate their bodies to give those precious lives a chance! And the men at the clinic, why I just get they are willing to give their daughters and wives up to the cause.
@BrutallyHonestBabes (aka Mrs. Sarah.of.a.Lesser.Hobbit): That was my exact thought while watching Stewart interview Huckabee. If all these embryos are 'real people', why aren't the pro-lifers volunteering their uteruses.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
No shit. I wonder if you can feel well when everybody is wondering about your sex, making nasty comments about it and questioning if you deserved your win.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/12/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Not only that, but to do all of those things with the particular kind of cancer she has? I don't even like to leave the comfort of my own bathroom when things get crazy down there.
07/07/09
/choked up
07/07/09
Women can't be well-informed! That's silly!
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
06/23/09
06/23/09
06/22/09
Why?
You don't want the embryo, why not let some couple have it?
I just don't understand why it is less popular than discarding them.
06/22/09
It's not 100% rational, but I can understand it.
06/22/09
And donating it to research is a way to contribute to life saving medicine.
06/23/09
06/23/09
06/22/09
06/23/09