Oddly, even though I do have a kind of eye-roll reaction to the older fans of Twilight...(probably because I'm a book snob and wish they'd get this obsessed about something really good so that authors telling much better stories got this kind of acclaim and attention..but that's a taste thing. I'd rather more people read Terry Pratchett than this...but lots of people think The Da Vinci Code is amazing. I could go on a rant about the reading habits of the general public, but it would be really judgy, and mostly pointless)...
...I don't have any issue with the fandom itself.
Stories connect differently to different people. Clearly something about this resonates with a lot of women of different ages. My personal opinion is because it's overwrought, adolescent, romance...the girl gets to be special, the boys get to be ogled, and it keeps up the tension by not sexually consummating until what, the last book? It's a relatively safe fantasy with the promise of undying love and eternal youth and life. Themes that people have glommed onto for as long as stories have been told, I'd imagine.
I think there are problems with it, mostly in the perpetuating troubling cultural gender issues arena. And the fact that it's difficult to have an analytical discussion about it without someone freaking out that you dared critique it, or someone else just deciding it doesn't matter enough to look at. Something that's this significant a pop culture phenomenon seems important to me, though.
I do not, by the way, have anything against the literary version of brain candy. Sometimes we just want something that makes us feel nostalgic. And the promise of adolescent romance and angst is pretty powerful stuff.
I just hope it leads to better fare. You can still have all those things and actually get solid social critique in, too. #twilight
@tiredfairy: ...and you just spared me from trying to come up with a way to sayy all that. So, ditto on everything (although I think Neil Gaiman is slightly more accessible for casual readers than Pratchett, but your point stands). I don't have a problem with the fandom (for the most part- there are always outliers), but I do have a problem with the source material. And it's hard to get into literary criticism when one side thinks its OMG! the best thing ever written ever, and the other side considers it more poorly written than the worst fanfiction, with troubling thematic elements. But yeah, I don't begruge people the right to love what they want to, but I do reserve the right to wish they loved something that isn't awful.
@pileofmonkeys: I'd say Pratchett is more accessible than Gaiman, actually. Depending on the Discworld book and the reader. There's more variety and the underlying sense of humor makes it easier to reel people in...before whacking them upside the head with something like Lords and Ladies or Nightwatch. #twilight
@pileofmonkeys: I have a degree in English. When I tell people this, they usually say something like "Oh you must be really into 'Twilight' then."
I really have the hardest time responding to this without out right saying the writing sucks and then sounding like a book snob. However, I am a book snob, so maybe I should start being a little bit more forthright with that fact. #twilight
@soykatrina: I also have an English degree (albeit not a recent one, I'm old-ish), and I always get asked how much I love Twilight. It's really really hard to be polite and totally not book-snob bitchy. So I usually preface any discussion with, "Well, I'm kind of a book snob, so..."
It's at the point where Twilight fans at work refuse to discuss Twilight in front of me because I just can't stop myself and they don't want to hear their bible being trashed. #twilight
@soykatrina: Shitty. If someone told me that, I would probably burst into tears. I majored in Genetics/Biochem, which led to people constantly assuming that I must have really enjoyed Jurassic Park. Which I did, because OMG SPARKL DINOS! #twilight
@tiredfairy: I have a Ph.D. in English, and I think Twilight is kind of genius -- not very well-written, but the structure and story details are awesome. It never occured to me to read it until I read Caitlin Flanagan's Atlantic Monthly review (also genius), and then I had to see the movie -- and enjoyed it very much. I thought Hardwicke went out of her way to adapt the book faithfully, and so even liked the sparkly stuff.
I was obsessed w/vampires many moons ago as a teenage girl and, basically, and hugely disappointed that I didn't write it... #twilight
@vixenatrix: I'm an editor and, other than the concept, which I think was pretty smart, I think most everything else about it is not very compelling. The structure doesn't wow me, the character development is blah, the narrative is all over the place, and the plot has gigantic holes. But then most readers aren't really paying attention to that sort of thing.
I think where it succeeds is appealing to overwrought adolescent emotions. But I'd rather watch Buffy. :} #twilight
@salthegeek: According to the interwebz, they RUINED ComicCon by waiting in lines and going to see panels that other people wanted to see. It was tragic, really. #twilight
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: I was one of those affected. I waited in a half a mile long line to get into the Avatar thing and didnt make it. I still got to see one fan chase after the guys SUV and got to see Terry Gilliam so it wasn't a total loss. #twilight
@salthegeek: Didn't a lot of moms already show up last year, though? I remember seeing a large number of them in the clips I saw from the panels. #twilight
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: Yeah, they did. The thing that pissed me off is that allot of them only bought the tickets only for that and didn't go to anything else. #twilight
@salthegeek: As a vendor at comic con, we were annoyed as well because you can't sell comic book stuff to a teenage girl who only wants to make out with an ice cube. I mean, it's their right to buy passes and go, but I think we'll all be glad when all the movies are out and they've moved on to something else. #twilight
@salthegeek: Well, look at the bright side. There are only 4 books and therefore 4 (maybe 5) movies. So worst case is the hardcore Twilight fans will go to 2, maybe 3 more cons. And some of them will probably start going to other stuff as well just because of the proximity. You never know what can be a gateway drug to nerdery. #twilight
@salthegeek: Which is true of a lot of the media stuff. Not just Twilight. Comicon has become two cons, really. There's the pop culture/movie/TV part, and the comics part. I don't see any difference in the Twilight fandom than Harry Potter or Star Wars. Other than the nerd hostility. If there's room for a Steampunk costume ball, there's room for Twilight. They're both about as related to comics.
And the thing is, we don't really know what else they went to. This past year was packed, and this coming year has already mostly sold out 4 day tickets. It's November.
And considering how non-girl friendly the comics industry in particular has presented itself to be for literally decades, I'm not surprised. Even though lots of women work in the industry creatively, actively, and visibly...the industry still acts like a boys club when it suits it, and gets bent out of shape whenever something new drops in.
Comicon has evolved. Either we accept that and move on, or stew in our nerd rage. I really don't see the point.
@lepas: Thats the thing I hate about it. There are allot of awesome stuff in the main hall and it's really sad that the Twilight fans are not going to there. #twilight
@tiredfairy: This year was my first year actively going to panels ( the year before I accidentally ended up in the Watchmen panel ). I mostly go for the indie comics ,which I kinda prefer to the more mainstream stuff. #twilight
@lepas: Really? You can't sell them Zombies Calling, or Scott Pilgrim, or Lenore, or Buffy? Or, depending on the age, Vertigo titles?
Considering comic book sales compared to Twilight book/movie/merch sales, I'd think you'd want to find ways to get them in. To appeal to them. They're buying a ton more Twilight stuff than anyone is buying comics. #twilight
@tiredfairy: The average twilight fan is actually not a fan of comics. That's not to say that there isn't any crossover, but overall, no, they don't want Scott Pilgrim or Y: The Last Man. #twilight
@lepas: My point is that they could be. I saw plenty of girls who were at the panel and other Twilight stuff (you could spot them by the merch) down on the floor, browsing through comics, and even buying some.
I don't know what numbers of them actually visited the rest of the Con, and I don't think anyone else does either. But there wasn't much effort made to entice them, and the attitude that "you can't sell comics to a teenage girl who only wants to make out with an ice cube" is pretty dismissive. They're fans of a genre story. There's a lot of room for crossover there if anyone bothered to try it. Lots of teenage girls like Manga, for instance. And I can see plenty of crossover with Twilight and Shoujo.
And frankly, "the average Twilight fan" appears to be teenage girls, tween girls, and adult women. That's actually a pretty broad fandom in terms of interests and experiences and buying power. They're also the demographics comics as an industry has the most trouble appealing to outside of very specific creators.
My point is that they COULD be comics fans, if anyone bothered to view them as something more than annoying. If you're only selling to people who already like something (ie. comics as a storytelling medium) then you're limiting your audience needlessly.
The question should be: How do we get the Twilight fans to check out the rest of Comicon and maybe buy these books?
Not: When are they going to go away, they're wounding my comic geek sensibilities with their fandom? #twilight
@tiredfairy: If I was Viz media, I would keep a Vampire Knight panel close to where I thought the twi-hards would be. (It's a terrible, trashy, shojo to be honest but that's what they see to be into so..)
To be quite honest though, the fangirls seemed more upset then the fanboys about comic con. I think it's a feeling of "We're different. Twilight has gone mainstream but we aren't and this is our space, are you are in it" and also "We have to prove our selves enough. We have to prove that we are just as dedicated and worthy as male geeks and you're holding us back" not that it's right but that sentiment does exist.
@Vanilla_Ninja: While I'm sure plenty of "fangirls" were upset, most of the "nerd rage" I saw about Twilight stuff at Comicon was sexist and most definitely resentful of a female dominated fandom. Numerous articles and blog posts, mostly reeking of Entitled Internet Male Nerd Syndrome. Almost all of the criticisms of Twilight could be said just as equally about LOTR, Star Trek, Star Wars, and anything else that exists as a pop culture phenomenon outside of comics.
Most fangirls in comics are 1. used to marginalization 2. supportive of fandoms in whatever form and 3. too busy being actively engaged in the industry to complain about Twilight.
I just find it hilarious that people would rail about the "obsessiveness" of Twilight fans when there's barely a fandom out there that doesn't have a rabid element. There's something really threatening about the audience for this by some elements of the status quo. #twilight
@tiredfairy: I agree about the blog nerd rage coming from the fanboys, but I've heard so many fangirls annoyed that were at comic con too. As for supporting that fandom.. I don't know that many do. I know lots of comic fangirls support HP, SPN and Yaoi fandom (other relatively new fandoms that the guys like to shun) but Twilight? Not so much. #twilight
@Vanilla_Ninja: ::shrug:: My experience with comics fangirls is somewhat different, then. The professionals, creatives, and fans I know, whether they like Twilight itself or not, support the right of the fans to enjoy their fandom. Because it's honestly ridiculous not to. You can't be a fan of a niche like comics, and then sub-niches within that, and get cranky about people getting really into a story. Do I love every way they express that? No. But, whatever. I don't always like the way Star Wars fans get into heated arguments about Jar Jar.
I suspect a lot of the issues with Twilight is the quality of the books, rather than the fans. There's not a fangirl alive who hasn't read something truly shitty and enjoyed it, so, to my mind, those that you've encountered doth protest too much. Especially since a lot of comics fangirls are into fanfic or slashfic.
And really, you can't resent Twilight fans for being more "mainstream" than comics fangirls, because it's a fandom of girls. They aren't marginalized within their own fandom. They're just dismissed by other fandoms.
I get that other fangirls would like to get treated more seriously, and not have to deal with the screaming teen fan stereotype. But that was there before this anyway. Girl fandoms are not widely respected no matter what the object of obsession is. They're treated as either "crazy" or too marginal to pay attention to. #twilight
@tiredfairy: I agree. I'm no fan and I've had my share of experiences with crazy twilight fans but it's still a female driven fandom that should be...Nurtured? Sadly, though I believe there is a mentality of siding with the boys to "get in" a lot of times and throwing the girls under the bus by members of older or more respected within "geek circles" fandoms.
"I don't always like the way Star Wars fans get into heated arguments about Jar Jar."
We'll have to agree to disagree here however because I find it absolutely hilarious. #twilight
@tiredfairy: It's a very good time to be a person with vampire related properties, no doubt. But printing and making comics is expensive. If you make and sell science fiction or indie comics, you can't very well up and change your entire stock to coincide with a trend.
The question of 'how do we get the twilight fans to go to other parts of the con' isn't fully valid. The con organizers book twilight related things all day, and because of the sheer number of twilight fans there, most of these people send their entire day waiting in line to get into a panel or (as discussed earlier) camping a panel. You can't even show a property to someone who isn't curiously wandering the con floor.
And since there is a finite number of passes to comic con, if 1/3 of those are a fandom of people who isn't even visiting the floor, then that's 1/3 less people to a presumably sold-out show who I can talk with. Does that mean no one was there at the comics end of the con? My goodness, no. It's a massive event.
I talked to a number of twihards at the con, and none of them were rude or 'wounded my comic geek sensibilities' (thx for being mildly insulting) they're simply there for Twilight stuff. Comic Con is expensive and I can't blame them for showing up to spend their money only on the thing they're totally crazy about.
That thing just happens to not be comics. : )
I'm sorry you took any of my comments as dismissive of a fandom. #twilight
@tiredfairy: Even Kevin Smith came out and called people out on being sexist assholes to the Twilight fans. I think he came at it from what could be seen as a more acceptable point of view (at least to some of my more rabid comic fan friends)- he obviously loves comics, writes comics, is a big fan of dick and fart jokes, etc.
But he's also the dad of a little girl who's into Twilight, and seeing people treat his daughter like she's less than them pissed him off. #twilight
@Vanilla_Ninja: That's too bad. I haven't seen that myself, but, I'm an oldtimer. I tend to stick to groups I know that are supportive and intellectual, so there tends to be a lot less of that sort of thing.
Oh, Jar Jar. Kids love him. Some of us wonder if he's really just the alien version of a minstrel show...etc. I laugh as well, until the upteenth time you have to sit through one. And then it's like, come on folks, let's just pretend those prequels were a bad dream. #twilight
@lepas: I'd argue that Twilight, while certainly vampire centric, doesn't require anyone who publishes a diverse line of books to completely revamp their output. Comics companies are as subject to trends as anyone else, usually dictated by whatever is popular in films.
I edit comics, I'm well aware of having to stay ahead of that sort of thing. Vampires are perennials, those kinds of stories (like zombies, and a lot of horror) tend to appeal to the same folks. But they're not the only thing. Twilight is as much teen angst/romance as it is vampire. And there are tons of comics that fit that description, vampires or not.
As far as the panels go, that's a Con organization problem. Not a fan problem. And panel camping has been an issue for years, it's not new to Twilight. So having to be online all day is true of nearly any popular fandom that's there. I know people who had to wait all day to go to a panel on The Office last year. So unless you're into something really obscure, chances are you're stuck. Scheduling, overbooked rooms, and lines, are just part of the routine of Comicon. So while I get the annoyance from some, it's misdirected. Twilights not responsible for any of that. And this last year, I think most everything was scheduled on one day. So if those fans were really only interested in Twilight, then they likely only bought one day passes. So unless all 4 days of Comicon had/are having big Twilight events, that doesn't explain why those ticks, and the ones for the Wed. preview night, are already sold out, unless some of those folks are seeing other things. And considering the swing of Comicon being a pop culture convention, rather than comics at this point, that's been true for awhile.
Again, Comicon has been catering to things other than comics for way longer than Twilight got involved. Maybe people minded less when there was more presumed crossover, but Twilight isn't the first non-comics event. Most of the con isn't about comics anymore, right or wrong.
I was making a statement about the attitude being presented about this fandom, which does smack of comic geek sensibility wounding. I didn't say you said that, I posed that one question is more helpful than the other. Although I'm not sure how else I should read the comment that the fans just want to make out with an ice cube. Or the following statement about hoping they'd just go away. Instead of, say, figuring out ways to get even a fraction of that buying power into comics.
Look, I'm not a Twilight fan. I couldn't possibly care less about the books themselves. But the fans of Twilight are precisely the elusive fandom comics has been failing to reach for a long time now, especially in those numbers. It seems shortsighted to me to dismiss those fans, or assume they couldn't get into something else that actually interested them. I'm not saying they necessarily will, either. But since there are...what...4+ books to make into films? We might get to find out. #twilight
Twilight makes me never want to have sex again, because I could get pregnant, and you know what happens when you get pregnant? Your baby's father has to bite your fetus out of you to save your life, and you turn into a vampire. And then as soon as your baby's born, your best friend/ex boyfriend decides that he's in love with your baby and that he and your baby are totes getting married someday. And your baby has an adult mind in a baby body.
Twilight sex results in nothing but creepiness. #twilight
@morninggloria: Um, hello? Once your vampire boyfriend gives you a gnawed-out vampire baby C-section, you turn into a totally hot vampire goddess with animal lust and extreme physical prowess.
I'd say it's a small price to pay for being, like, totally HAWT. #twilight
@morninggloria: And your baby can communicate telepathically, grows about 2 months for every day she's on earth and brings on interspecies war, thereby endangering your entire family and all your friends.
I would definitely agree that however terrible the writing is (and it truly is awful) she does capture the feeling of young love quite well. At certain points in the first book I was actually audibly "squeeing" and I assure you I am not the squeeing type. #twilight
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: I thought the same thing. Frankly, I found the emotional depth in New Moon shocking - it perfectly, perfectly, perfectly captured that feeling when your high school boyfriend dumps you and you just feel empty. As adults, we know that a relationship isn't our whole world and that getting dumped isn't the end of your life - but when you're a teenager (at least, when I was) it's like OMG MY LIFE IS OVER. I thought Meyer did that so well. #twilight
You know, it takes a very special book to be both too vanilla for me AND too creepy for me.
Two hetero teens who are all pining and no play is boring.
An obsessed stalker who breaks into a young woman's bedroom to watch her sleep is disturbing.
I'm glad for people who now want to have sex with their partners because of this book. I really am.
But I'm also worried about the cultural implications of treating stalkers as romantic figures. I'm not saying teen girls are suddenly going to think stalking is cool, but I do think cultural memes can alter us in ways that are surprisingly subtle. #twilight
One of the great fringe benefits of being an adult is that you no longer give a damn what anyone else thinks about the stuff you like. (Granted, I could have not given a damn what Ben Powers thought about the Cure
when I was 17, but somehow that was impossible.) If I have to get up early in the morning, pay taxes, and wear boring clothes to work, I'm sure as hell not going to apologize for liking ridiculous sparkly vampire novels.
I will, however, cheerfully admit that they're ridiculous and that Charlaine Harris is a much more palatable guilty pleasure. #twilight
@la.donna.pietra: THANK YOU! The Sookie Stackhouse books are infinitely better. That said, though, they're really for completely different audiences. The Sookie books just aren't for kids. They target anyone who is grown up enough to know what it's like to have to work for a living, take care of a house and be a responsible adult. I love that for Sookie, her biggest problems aren't always the vamps, shifters or faeries in her life. It's how she's going to get the money to pave the driveway or to afford a cell phone. I can appreciate that.
The Twilight books target that time before adulthood. When you could moon over boys most of the day and night because homework was probably your biggest responsibility. #twilight
@alula: OMG UNICORNS! That one kills me. I showed my friend who loves Twilight that part and she almost died laughing. My boyfriend and I still make jokes about "unicorning." #twilight
I wouldn't mind people being so obsessed with these books if they were examples of high-caliber writing or inventive storytelling. They have demonstrated themselves to be neither, as far as I'm concerned.
And I can't really explain my distaste as lucidly as you all have here, when my boy's sisters (who are adults) are all, "Have you read it yet? Huh? It's great! You'll love it! Read it. Come on." And I have nothing but, "Vampire stuff just isn't my thing..." and becoming very interested in the baseboards to fall back on. #twilight
@hydrogen_jukebox: By the way, I'm definitely not trying to say they're great books (from a literary standpoint) but I have read them and I enjoyed them for what they are--cheap entertainment. It's kind of like watching a bad teen soap that you're really into but you know is ridiculous so you watch it when no one's home and pretend it never happened. I actually had the exact same reaction while reading Charlaine Harris--the Sookie Stackhouse books are pretty awful from a writing standpoint, but you get used to it after a few chapters and the story is still interesting enough to keep you entertained for a few days, which is exactly how long it takes to read the whole series.
Obviously the hype is a little annoying, but I don't understand the energy wasted on the backlash either. #twilight
this love story of someone who's average and normal with this stellar, amazing person
This is where they lose me. Bella Swan isn't drawn up as "average and normal." She moves to this new town and suddenly every boy loves her, including this vampire kid. She is the encapsulation of many a teenage daydream, in that she's "ordinary" in so far as she's not the homecoming queen or the head cheerleader, but she's still the girl every boy wants to date. She's Regina George without the fangs, really, wearing a gothier expression and drab clothes.
@hortense: i've never read the books, but yeah...the whole 'average and normal' thing never goes hand in hand with every guy in town wanting to be with you. fantasy! right...there! #twilight
@hortense: My mom said that it was that whole 'not beautiful' woman with the dreamiest man EVER trope that made her toss the romance novels aside. She said every book was written that way. I guess it makes the normal gals reading the books feel like we really could end up with some Fabio type dude.
BTW, my mom replaced the romance novels with Stephen King horror novels and murder mysteries. #twilight
@hortense: I read the books, and she's very annoying. I think people are convinced she is normal and ordinary because she spends most of the book putting herself down and constantly saying "but i'm ordinary! how does he love me!". Routine self-deprecation that stays at the same level throughout four books proved tiring.
@hortense: I know what you mean, but I always thought that was supposed to have to do with her moving to a very small town. Everyone's always intrigued by the "new girl", and if she' s pretty, the guys always fight over her a little (at least in my experience). I agree, though, it was strange that they never at least admitted she was hot (if still shy and awkward). #twilight
@cinematheques: Yeah, her flaws are really very minor. It's like "Oh, yes, I am adored by every male within a 50-mile radius, and I'm so smart I already KNOW everything in my chemistry class, and I cook dinner for my idiot father every night with loving care and culinary expertise, and I take care of my mom emotionally because she is dumb as a brick, and I have captured the heart of a Greek-god-resembling vampire...but I am so CLUMSY! Dear me! Whatever shall I do?!" #twilight
I can't judge. I'm a late 30-something woman who has developed a recent addiction to reading Japanese manga. Not to mention my still ongoing fascination with the Harry Potter series (points to icon). I haven't read the Twilight series because I'm generally not into the romance genre, but I see no issue with fans young or old enjoying it.
I don't see a lot of criticism levied against middle-aged men for geeking out over fantasy baseball or playing Wizards of Warcraft or still buying comic books. Why can't women have the same fun? #twilight
@pumpkinsoup: Um, Comic Book Guy is practically an archetype, he's such a huge joke. And most of my friends who play WOW obsessively get made fun of pretty intensely. I just don't think criticising this is sexist. #twilight
@pumpkinsoup: 1. World of Warcraft ;)
2. Why is manga an issue for a late 30 something woman. I've been trying to get my mom and aunt who are both late 40 something to read comics (ok graphic novels but they are comics) for years and they both finally gave in and LOVED all that I shared.
@pumpkinsoup: I've been a shoujo manga addict from the age of fifteen, and a Harry Potter nut from age thirteen, and ten years on I still refuse to feel guilty about it. But to be honest, neither of those fandoms (manga in general, not just shoujo/girls' manga, or HP) are seen as being dominated by people of one particular gender, and their fans aren't quite as nuts as the Twihards.
And trust me. I know this: I spent eighteen months moderating one of the largest Harry Potter discussion forums online, and even the nuttier shippers could keep a sense of perspective about it. It helps that the central elements of HP aren't romance-focussed, while Twilight most definitely is- and that most of the fans aren't quite as mad about the movie actors or don'i identify their real life personas quite as strongly with their characters.
Nothing wrong with geeking out, honestly. Just keep your head on while doing it, is all I ask of any fan. #twilight
@funnyface: It may be an archetype, but I used to work with a 40-something guy who was into comics, and he was completely unapologetic about it. He didn't live in his parents' basement either. Yet, I think women, especially women who are past the age of 30, are made to feel embarrassed for having fannish interests. I've seen amongst my circle of friends who are all in the 35-45 year range. One of my girlfriends lied to her co-workers and most of her friends rather than admit that she went to Comic-con last year.
I'll give you another example, my husband's first cousin and wife are both avid WOW players. His wife gets way more dirision from the female members of our family than his male cousin.
@sara007: Thanks for the correction. I'm not a WOW fan myself.
I'm trying to get the children's librarian at my branch library to read manga. She is so resistant. I think it's the misperception that manga can't be literary. #twilight
@pumpkinsoup: I feel there's definitely an element of belittling something which appeals primarily to women. That said, I wouldn't read any of them. That said, I do have other (un) intellectual guilty pleasures. #twilight
@Waterlily: I'm not into romance myself, so Twilight doesn't appeal to me. I have two adult friends who are: one who is a member of a Twilight fan group and regularly goes to meet-ups and the other who finds the whole Twilight mom phenomenon embarrassing and wants nothing to do with it. #twilight
@pumpkinsoup: Honest to goodness, if you're not into romance and still want a good fantasy series to read, try the Temeraire/His Majesty's Dragon series by Naomi Novik. In one sentence, it involves a Napoleonic-era air force comprised of dragons, if you like those- and it's nothing at all like Eragon.
Oh, and if you really need a lust object, Captain Will Lawrence (or even John Granby) is a much better one than, well, sparklevamp. (sorry to sound like a fangirl but I discovered the series just a few months ago and have been geeking out ever since) #twilight
@pumpkinsoup: Oh, do! It's the best thing I've read (as pop fiction) since Harry Potter, and its comparative obscurity means I'm thrilled to spread the word wherever I can. #twilight
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Actually, I did- still do, in fact. It was pretty easy to avoid the madhouse corners, though. And the forums were a fairly tightly-run ship when it came to character and actor discussion or even posting etiquette.
Also, the HP craziness remained online (even the worst of the shipper wars didn't make newspaper headlines or anything). It was a bit of a factor in keeping the fandom less annoying, really. #twilight
"...the appeal is that it's very simple and pure and it outlines this love story of someone who's average and normal with this stellar, amazing person who has eyes for no one but her and could save her from anything."
RIGHT THERE is where I call bullshit. Bella is a flat character designed to be a blank canvas upon which any woman, young or old, can project her personality. Edward is not in love with her, he's obsessed with her. Sex is inextricably linked with violence, and her love for him is based on her repeated helplessness and his tireless rescuing.
If you like the books, like them. Don't try to tell me that the characters are in any way unique or complex, or that the series is a brilliant exposure of young love between pure teenagers. It's about dirty and dangerous sex; just go with that. #twilight
11/16/09
...I don't have any issue with the fandom itself.
Stories connect differently to different people. Clearly something about this resonates with a lot of women of different ages. My personal opinion is because it's overwrought, adolescent, romance...the girl gets to be special, the boys get to be ogled, and it keeps up the tension by not sexually consummating until what, the last book? It's a relatively safe fantasy with the promise of undying love and eternal youth and life. Themes that people have glommed onto for as long as stories have been told, I'd imagine.
I think there are problems with it, mostly in the perpetuating troubling cultural gender issues arena. And the fact that it's difficult to have an analytical discussion about it without someone freaking out that you dared critique it, or someone else just deciding it doesn't matter enough to look at. Something that's this significant a pop culture phenomenon seems important to me, though.
I do not, by the way, have anything against the literary version of brain candy. Sometimes we just want something that makes us feel nostalgic. And the promise of adolescent romance and angst is pretty powerful stuff.
I just hope it leads to better fare. You can still have all those things and actually get solid social critique in, too. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I really have the hardest time responding to this without out right saying the writing sucks and then sounding like a book snob. However, I am a book snob, so maybe I should start being a little bit more forthright with that fact. #twilight
11/16/09
It's at the point where Twilight fans at work refuse to discuss Twilight in front of me because I just can't stop myself and they don't want to hear their bible being trashed. #twilight
11/16/09
11/17/09
I was obsessed w/vampires many moons ago as a teenage girl and, basically, and hugely disappointed that I didn't write it... #twilight
11/17/09
I think where it succeeds is appealing to overwrought adolescent emotions. But I'd rather watch Buffy. :} #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
And the thing is, we don't really know what else they went to. This past year was packed, and this coming year has already mostly sold out 4 day tickets. It's November.
And considering how non-girl friendly the comics industry in particular has presented itself to be for literally decades, I'm not surprised. Even though lots of women work in the industry creatively, actively, and visibly...the industry still acts like a boys club when it suits it, and gets bent out of shape whenever something new drops in.
Comicon has evolved. Either we accept that and move on, or stew in our nerd rage. I really don't see the point.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Considering comic book sales compared to Twilight book/movie/merch sales, I'd think you'd want to find ways to get them in. To appeal to them. They're buying a ton more Twilight stuff than anyone is buying comics. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
I don't know what numbers of them actually visited the rest of the Con, and I don't think anyone else does either. But there wasn't much effort made to entice them, and the attitude that "you can't sell comics to a teenage girl who only wants to make out with an ice cube" is pretty dismissive. They're fans of a genre story. There's a lot of room for crossover there if anyone bothered to try it. Lots of teenage girls like Manga, for instance. And I can see plenty of crossover with Twilight and Shoujo.
And frankly, "the average Twilight fan" appears to be teenage girls, tween girls, and adult women. That's actually a pretty broad fandom in terms of interests and experiences and buying power. They're also the demographics comics as an industry has the most trouble appealing to outside of very specific creators.
My point is that they COULD be comics fans, if anyone bothered to view them as something more than annoying. If you're only selling to people who already like something (ie. comics as a storytelling medium) then you're limiting your audience needlessly.
The question should be: How do we get the Twilight fans to check out the rest of Comicon and maybe buy these books?
Not: When are they going to go away, they're wounding my comic geek sensibilities with their fandom? #twilight
11/16/09
To be quite honest though, the fangirls seemed more upset then the fanboys about comic con. I think it's a feeling of "We're different. Twilight has gone mainstream but we aren't and this is our space, are you are in it" and also "We have to prove our selves enough. We have to prove that we are just as dedicated and worthy as male geeks and you're holding us back" not that it's right but that sentiment does exist.
11/16/09
Most fangirls in comics are 1. used to marginalization 2. supportive of fandoms in whatever form and 3. too busy being actively engaged in the industry to complain about Twilight.
I just find it hilarious that people would rail about the "obsessiveness" of Twilight fans when there's barely a fandom out there that doesn't have a rabid element. There's something really threatening about the audience for this by some elements of the status quo. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
I suspect a lot of the issues with Twilight is the quality of the books, rather than the fans. There's not a fangirl alive who hasn't read something truly shitty and enjoyed it, so, to my mind, those that you've encountered doth protest too much. Especially since a lot of comics fangirls are into fanfic or slashfic.
And really, you can't resent Twilight fans for being more "mainstream" than comics fangirls, because it's a fandom of girls. They aren't marginalized within their own fandom. They're just dismissed by other fandoms.
I get that other fangirls would like to get treated more seriously, and not have to deal with the screaming teen fan stereotype. But that was there before this anyway. Girl fandoms are not widely respected no matter what the object of obsession is. They're treated as either "crazy" or too marginal to pay attention to. #twilight
11/16/09
"I don't always like the way Star Wars fans get into heated arguments about Jar Jar."
We'll have to agree to disagree here however because I find it absolutely hilarious. #twilight
11/16/09
The question of 'how do we get the twilight fans to go to other parts of the con' isn't fully valid. The con organizers book twilight related things all day, and because of the sheer number of twilight fans there, most of these people send their entire day waiting in line to get into a panel or (as discussed earlier) camping a panel. You can't even show a property to someone who isn't curiously wandering the con floor.
And since there is a finite number of passes to comic con, if 1/3 of those are a fandom of people who isn't even visiting the floor, then that's 1/3 less people to a presumably sold-out show who I can talk with. Does that mean no one was there at the comics end of the con? My goodness, no. It's a massive event.
I talked to a number of twihards at the con, and none of them were rude or 'wounded my comic geek sensibilities' (thx for being mildly insulting) they're simply there for Twilight stuff. Comic Con is expensive and I can't blame them for showing up to spend their money only on the thing they're totally crazy about.
That thing just happens to not be comics. : )
I'm sorry you took any of my comments as dismissive of a fandom. #twilight
11/16/09
But he's also the dad of a little girl who's into Twilight, and seeing people treat his daughter like she's less than them pissed him off. #twilight
11/16/09
Oh, Jar Jar. Kids love him. Some of us wonder if he's really just the alien version of a minstrel show...etc. I laugh as well, until the upteenth time you have to sit through one. And then it's like, come on folks, let's just pretend those prequels were a bad dream. #twilight
11/16/09
I edit comics, I'm well aware of having to stay ahead of that sort of thing. Vampires are perennials, those kinds of stories (like zombies, and a lot of horror) tend to appeal to the same folks. But they're not the only thing. Twilight is as much teen angst/romance as it is vampire. And there are tons of comics that fit that description, vampires or not.
As far as the panels go, that's a Con organization problem. Not a fan problem. And panel camping has been an issue for years, it's not new to Twilight. So having to be online all day is true of nearly any popular fandom that's there. I know people who had to wait all day to go to a panel on The Office last year. So unless you're into something really obscure, chances are you're stuck. Scheduling, overbooked rooms, and lines, are just part of the routine of Comicon. So while I get the annoyance from some, it's misdirected. Twilights not responsible for any of that. And this last year, I think most everything was scheduled on one day. So if those fans were really only interested in Twilight, then they likely only bought one day passes. So unless all 4 days of Comicon had/are having big Twilight events, that doesn't explain why those ticks, and the ones for the Wed. preview night, are already sold out, unless some of those folks are seeing other things. And considering the swing of Comicon being a pop culture convention, rather than comics at this point, that's been true for awhile.
Again, Comicon has been catering to things other than comics for way longer than Twilight got involved. Maybe people minded less when there was more presumed crossover, but Twilight isn't the first non-comics event. Most of the con isn't about comics anymore, right or wrong.
I was making a statement about the attitude being presented about this fandom, which does smack of comic geek sensibility wounding. I didn't say you said that, I posed that one question is more helpful than the other. Although I'm not sure how else I should read the comment that the fans just want to make out with an ice cube. Or the following statement about hoping they'd just go away. Instead of, say, figuring out ways to get even a fraction of that buying power into comics.
Look, I'm not a Twilight fan. I couldn't possibly care less about the books themselves. But the fans of Twilight are precisely the elusive fandom comics has been failing to reach for a long time now, especially in those numbers. It seems shortsighted to me to dismiss those fans, or assume they couldn't get into something else that actually interested them. I'm not saying they necessarily will, either. But since there are...what...4+ books to make into films? We might get to find out. #twilight
11/16/09
Twilight sex results in nothing but creepiness. #twilight
11/16/09
I'd say it's a small price to pay for being, like, totally HAWT. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
Yeah. Soooo not going there. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Two hetero teens who are all pining and no play is boring.
An obsessed stalker who breaks into a young woman's bedroom to watch her sleep is disturbing.
I'm glad for people who now want to have sex with their partners because of this book. I really am.
But I'm also worried about the cultural implications of treating stalkers as romantic figures. I'm not saying teen girls are suddenly going to think stalking is cool, but I do think cultural memes can alter us in ways that are surprisingly subtle. #twilight
11/16/09
when I was 17, but somehow that was impossible.) If I have to get up early in the morning, pay taxes, and wear boring clothes to work, I'm sure as hell not going to apologize for liking ridiculous sparkly vampire novels.
I will, however, cheerfully admit that they're ridiculous and that Charlaine Harris is a much more palatable guilty pleasure. #twilight
11/16/09
The Twilight books target that time before adulthood. When you could moon over boys most of the day and night because homework was probably your biggest responsibility. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
Likewise, this got linked on a snark site I read and I literally had nightmares. All I'm going to say is "sous-vide."
[www.fanfiction.net] #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
We know that's you, Anna Wintour! #twilight
11/16/09
I wouldn't mind people being so obsessed with these books if they were examples of high-caliber writing or inventive storytelling. They have demonstrated themselves to be neither, as far as I'm concerned.
And I can't really explain my distaste as lucidly as you all have here, when my boy's sisters (who are adults) are all, "Have you read it yet? Huh? It's great! You'll love it! Read it. Come on." And I have nothing but, "Vampire stuff just isn't my thing..." and becoming very interested in the baseboards to fall back on. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Obviously the hype is a little annoying, but I don't understand the energy wasted on the backlash either. #twilight
11/16/09
This is where they lose me. Bella Swan isn't drawn up as "average and normal." She moves to this new town and suddenly every boy loves her, including this vampire kid. She is the encapsulation of many a teenage daydream, in that she's "ordinary" in so far as she's not the homecoming queen or the head cheerleader, but she's still the girl every boy wants to date. She's Regina George without the fangs, really, wearing a gothier expression and drab clothes.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
BTW, my mom replaced the romance novels with Stephen King horror novels and murder mysteries. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Has anyone else grown to absolutely hate the word "pure"? #twilight
11/16/09
I don't see a lot of criticism levied against middle-aged men for geeking out over fantasy baseball or playing Wizards of Warcraft or still buying comic books. Why can't women have the same fun? #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
2. Why is manga an issue for a late 30 something woman. I've been trying to get my mom and aunt who are both late 40 something to read comics (ok graphic novels but they are comics) for years and they both finally gave in and LOVED all that I shared.
11/16/09
11/16/09
And trust me. I know this: I spent eighteen months moderating one of the largest Harry Potter discussion forums online, and even the nuttier shippers could keep a sense of perspective about it. It helps that the central elements of HP aren't romance-focussed, while Twilight most definitely is- and that most of the fans aren't quite as mad about the movie actors or don'i identify their real life personas quite as strongly with their characters.
Nothing wrong with geeking out, honestly. Just keep your head on while doing it, is all I ask of any fan. #twilight
11/16/09
I'll give you another example, my husband's first cousin and wife are both avid WOW players. His wife gets way more dirision from the female members of our family than his male cousin.
11/16/09
I'm trying to get the children's librarian at my branch library to read manga. She is so resistant. I think it's the misperception that manga can't be literary. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Oh, and if you really need a lust object, Captain Will Lawrence (or even John Granby) is a much better one than, well, sparklevamp. (sorry to sound like a fangirl but I discovered the series just a few months ago and have been geeking out ever since) #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Also we're supposed to look stunning all the time but not spend any time or money doing so, because that would divert our energy from SERVING MENZ.
Didn't you get your memo?
11/16/09
Don't spend much time on LJ, then? #twilight
11/16/09
Also, the HP craziness remained online (even the worst of the shipper wars didn't make newspaper headlines or anything). It was a bit of a factor in keeping the fandom less annoying, really. #twilight
11/16/09
But I will continue to chastise my 40-something aunt for saying Jacob/Taylor Lautner is "hot". That's cringe-inducing. #twilight
11/16/09
RIGHT THERE is where I call bullshit. Bella is a flat character designed to be a blank canvas upon which any woman, young or old, can project her personality. Edward is not in love with her, he's obsessed with her. Sex is inextricably linked with violence, and her love for him is based on her repeated helplessness and his tireless rescuing.
If you like the books, like them. Don't try to tell me that the characters are in any way unique or complex, or that the series is a brilliant exposure of young love between pure teenagers. It's about dirty and dangerous sex; just go with that. #twilight
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09