OK-- Disney softened these princesses hard core, but most of these stories have roots in an earlier time where female sexuality was fraught with a double pitfall of being potentially life threatening, but still being a ticket out of a harsh existence. Disney didn't invent most of these stories, they just kiddified them and purtied up the chicks. Is that right? Probably not, but to blame Disney for the story arcs these characters take is somewhat disingenuous I feel. #disneybridal
There's not much original thought here. Yes, disney is evil, they're racist/sexist/homophobic, etc. We've gotten to that point already. Move along - get deeper into the issues, the whys and the hows and the whatnots, because just pointing out, yet again, that fairy tales are problematic advances the discussion not a step. #disneybridal
@phnuggle: And trying to combat archetypes-which are problematic because they reduce whole groups of people into easy catagories- with reductive comments (that could be funny but fall a little flat, IMO) only hurts the creator's argument. And it could be a good argument, if people would take the time to a) discuss why gender, race, and power dynamics in fairy tales and folk tales are so problematic b) understand the social and historical context that shaped the stories and c) learn to not project themselves and our time into the stories. You can't make a 13th century story about getting married off to a stranger into a story about female empowerment unless it is in the story. Otherwise you're projecting and reaching unsupportable conclusions. #disneybridal
A lot of people are defending Belle and Ariel as independent women who made their choices and yadda yadda. I couldn't stand the older princesses when I was a little girl and loved Belle/Ariel, but I really think that the "independence" we see in the post-women's lib princesses is all superficial because their independence is always overcome in the end by their desire for love.
Yes, Ariel disobeys her patriarch of a father and is kinda a bad-ass rule breaking teenager, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a dreamy prince. Yes, Belle is a bookworm who would rather read that swoon over Gaston, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a beastly prince. Yes, Jasmine disobeys her patriach of a father and tries to escape an arranged marriage, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a loveable street-rat.
Yes, Pocohantas disobeys her patriach of a father and promotes cross-cultual communication, but her story still revolves around her relationship with John Smith.
Yes, Mulan disobeys her patriach of a father and dresses in drag and goes to war, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with her commanding officer.
you get my picture.
The modern princesses are given more subjectivity in the beginning of their stories and we like that, its a good thing, its a step forward. It makes them fuller characters than the princesses of the past. But the end of the stories is always the same; they always ends with validation through love and implied (if not explicitly shown) marriage. That independence that we loved as little girls because we could see in them ourselves, was always sacrificed for the ring in the end. #disneybridal
@KATE!: I don't think Mulan's story has marriage and love as the purpose or major event of the story in quite the same way as the other ones. It's more like Aladdin, in which romance is an important but still peripheral part of the adventure.
@shaldar002: No, I don't think it was as large of a part of the story as some of the other examples I gave, but the fact that it still had to end that way anyway further illustrates my point. Because ending a war wasn't good enough! The true happy ending was finding her man. #disneybridal
@KATE!: To be fair, the male characters in Disney movies aren't really defined outside of relationships either, unless it is a movie where there are no romantic relationships. Is it lazy story telling? Yes. Is it teaching girls that they are only worth anything if a man (and a handsome "prince") loves them? Eh. That's debatable. I think the main problem is that in the past Disney has focused on stories that have already been written and those are notoriously weak on the female character development and empowerment. I kind of wish that Disney would take a cue from Pixar and start making more movies that are a little more modern and original. You can only improve a story so much if the source material is problematic. #disneybridal
@5ft of fury: i agree on the pixar bit. which sucks, because i really love the hand-drawn quality of the masterpiece collection but they do seem to only do semi-imaginative rehashings of old european fairy and folk tales. and its true that the male characters in disney films that are about the princesses serve a pretty one-dimensional role. hey, you be a prince, you save this chick, then you marry her. but in the ones where the males are the titular characters, where is a much larger sense of adventure in the story and the romance kind of takes a backseat. and there are exceptions to every rule of course. they need new stories. they need protagonists that don't rely so heavily on gender roles. they need to get off this fucking princess kick, because unless they do a xena warrior princess film they're going to keep falling into this pattern.
and i do think its teaching young girls things like this. how fucking obnoxious (and pervasive) is princess-culture? there are grown women who want to be/think they're princesses. most of us grow up and out of it, but some people just aren't able or willing to let it go. #disneybridal
@KATE!: While Disney and Barbie are certainly some of the most marketed emblems of "princess culture", I think it is part of the larger "female sexuality is scary and bad but so hawwt culture" the patriarchy has promoted. Do I find women who want to be princesses obnoxious and out of touch with reality? Yes. Do I think that Disney or Barbie made them this way? Eh, I'd look at the way their families and communities view gender roles, as those two things are a constant presence in someone's life. I don't think that the princess culture can be reduced to "Disney made and perpetuates this", it seems that it's a little more complicated than that. #disneybridal
@Louis Wang: there is nothing wrong with love. but there is something wrong when the narrative always ends with love. thats the end of the story. conflict resolved, problem solved. happily ever after. the end. when every woman's story ends on her wedding day...yikes.
one of the reasons (middle-class western) women get married much later in life than they used to is because marriage used to end a woman's public life. the societal expectation was that upon marriage she would quit whatever job or schooling or whatever she was pursuing outside of the domestic sphere and go into the home to be a wife and mother, and women didn't like that restriction. we fought very hard to extend our lives outside of the domestic sphere so that a woman's narrative would continue on after her wedding day. things have changed, but the disney princesses haven't quite caught up yet. #disneybridal
@5ft of fury: oh i certainly don't think disney is the root of all of this at all. but i do think it perpetuates it though, it couldn't help but perpetuate it, given the sheer size and influence of the company. they're not the only ones who do this of course, but by being such influential and prolific childhood taste makers for 65+ something years, its very easy to analyze their collective output. #disneybridal
@KATE!: I'm sorry, but no, marriage, certainly in Belle's case, does not mark the end of her independence. It's an easy mistake to make, but like it or not, marriage is a valid feminist choice. Marriage doesn't have to be about the patriarchy forcing women to become chattel. It can be two people who really like and love each other committing to each other under the law and often also making a commitment to God and to their community. #disneybridal
@Dancingfrog: "I'm sorry, but no, marriage, certainly in Belle's case, does not mark the end of her independence."
And your evidence for this is? The fact that there were two direct-to-video sequels? Which actually weren't sequels at all because the took place WITHIN the timeline of the original movie, before her happily ever and wedding?
"like it or not marriage is a valid feminist choice"
when did i say that it wasn't?
"Marriage doesn't have to be about the patriarchy forcing women to become chattel."
No, it doesn't have to be and most of the time I don't think it is. Sometimes it is though. Admitting this wont suddenly invalidate your marriage. Also, marriage means something A LOT different than it did 50 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 1000 years ago. What I was mentioning upthread was what marriage USED to be, not what it is now. Which is why i think the disney films are outdated. Women don't get married directly after (or during!) adolescence anymore and even if they do, the societal expectation isn't for them to shrink into the private sphere as they once did. #disneybridal
@KATE!: The real problem then is that the narrative text doesn't exist yet. The princess equivalent to "Hook" doesn't really exist does it? That, and we aren't ready for it either, what with our youth/botox culture. #disneybridal
@KATE!: Um... I didn't mean this to be an attack on you. Nor did I a refresher in Women Studies History 101... I've already studied history in quite a bit more detail than that. Nor did I mean to dismiss that in some countries marriage means a man has control over his wife in one way or another, and that this is horrible. No, what we have here was an internet misunderstanding, and I'm sorry I was not clearer in my previous post. However, none of this dismisses the fact that Belle was a quite modern young woman set in a fantasy version of Europe, and she certainly did her own bidding, and not someone else's. Her marriage was out of her choice. It wasn't like Sleeping Beauty or Snow White where the girl *has* to marry the prince because he saves her life. #disneybridal
One of my favorite papers that I wrote was about how men can be attractive or unattractive in Disney but the females must be nothing but good looking. Lack of beauty = evil. I know it is pretty obvious but I was proud of that paper and frankly it made me decide if I ever do have children they will not be allowed to watch most Disney films.
Then I had a friend tell me The Lion King is racist (unfortunately without explaining) which makes me wonder how many other things my white privilege makes me ignorant about. *sigh* So then I decided it would just be easier to not have kids - the world is way too complicated. #disneybridal
@Elaken: A lot of people fault the Lion King because it is the only disney film set in africa and all of the characters are anthropomorphized animals instead of humans because the inclusion of humans would mean that Disney would have to acknowledge the existence of black people. It is certainly an interesting thing to point out and consider, but I don't know how much water this argument holds. Robin Hood and Bambi kind of work against this argument.
Although Rafiki the blue-bottomed baboon is another shining example of Disney's totally bizarre dialect decisions. And Scar is TOTALLY coded gay. So perhaps Lion King is a bit homophobic too? #disneybridal
@KATE!: I didn't get the coded gay thing at all from Scar. He's menacing and powerful and witty and deceptive, definitely not stereotypically gay traits. I think if you want to be offended, you will be.
@shaldar002: Disney has a long history of coding the male villains as gay. Scar, Jafar, Frollo, Mr. Fox (from Pinnochio), Prince John(Robin Hood). They're all effeminate, slight, urbane, witty (well, prince john is a dolt), manipulative and outsiders who seek to overthrow the standing order and often envy or attempt to bring down the masculine heterosexual man who is the hero. They never have relationships of their own, even though they are all adults, and whenever they do express desire in a female character it is not from a romantic perspective but a controlling, dominating perspective.
And I mean, Ursula from The Little Mermaid was basically a fabulous, fat drag queen. #disneybridal
@Elaken: Oh I should also add (but forgot about initially) that the hyenas are problematic. The are ghettoized into the elephant graveyard and are obviously coded as and voiced by poc. they complain that there is nothing to eat and want to depend on the lions to feed them (painting them as leeches of a welfare state) and when scar comes to power they "ruin" the pridelands (by, you know, bringing property levels down). #disneybridal
@KATE!: Wow. I mean, I get what you're saying, but wow. As someone who lives in Africa, who is around the animals from The Lion King, I understand hyenas as leeches that scavenger kills left by animals like lions, even though they're strong enough to kill themselves. It's what hyenas do, they scavenger. I see your point, but seriously, a lot of that is just how hyenas are! Have you ever seen wild hyena? Have you ever watched their behavior in the wild? Hyenas are not animals that other animals associate with - they're nasty and prey on the weak. When I'm in the bush I'm not afraid of a hyena the way I'm afraid of a lion; hyenas are more twisted and conniving, almost more sinister. Of course the film gives them human traits, but a lot of that behavior is taken from the nature of the animal. And I don't see them as "ruining" the Pridelands alone - I thought it was clear that the greed and selfishness of Scar's regime ruined the Pridelands.
An elephant graveyards aren't ghettos, at least not as understood in many African cultures. Historically elephant graveyards are seen a sacred due to the admiration of elephants. Elephants were admired because they had no enemies in the animal world - they are not afraid of anyone, and no other beast could conquer an them. Elephants were seen as rulers of the wild that could only die natural deaths, therefore the places where they died - elephant graveyards - were sacred. Now of course we know that some lion prides are skilled enough to kill an elephant (though it usually requires the entire pride to do so), and that elephants kill each other. Yet the sacred nature of an elephant graveyard isn't overlooked. That's what I saw depicted in The Lion King - you don't mess with sacred, mythical territory, and only irreverent animals would do so.
I know the socio-political elements of Disney movies, in this case The Lion King, are appealing. Surely sometimes/most of the time, reading those themes into the movie is beneficial. However, don't overlook the simplicity of what's being depicted, in this case, Africa. I think that the Disney folks did their research. #disneybridal
@SleepsWithButterflies: and do these wild hyenas sound particularly ethnic when they speak or it is just coincidental that the villains of a film set in africa were the only characters voiced by people of color (with the exception of rafiki who very clearly fits the magical negro stereotype and happens to be the only character with an african dialect) while all of the heros and comical characters were voiced by white people?
the objection is not that hyenas are the villains, but that villains are coded as the only poc in a very very white film.
think of the crows in dumbo, for the 90s. #disneybridal
@KATE!: My reply was not to say that nothing you wrote made sense. I didn't address the voices of the hyenas because you have a valid point there. I only addressed your issue about the lions feeding them by explaining actual hyena feeding habits, your comment about the elephant graveyard by giving you some African context, and your observation about the hyenas ruining the Pridelands by asserting my opinion.
Wild hyenas don't 'speak' at all, so I have no reason to comment on their voices. I understand your point about the actors portraying them, though, so I felt and continue to feel no reason to contradict you or add anything to your argument. I made no attempt to argue about the race of the actors portraying the characters. I'm also aware of the archetypal roles of various characters in The Lion King beyond only Rafiki, and I understand that socio-political readings of the movie can be correct, as I stated.
My goal was just to add a little African reality to certain things in the movie, that is all. #disneybridal
@KATE!: Mufasa - a pretty important character - was voiced by James Earl Jones. Last time I checked, he was a poc. Young Nala was voiced by Niketa Calame, a poc. Madge Sinclair, a poc, voiced Sarabi (Simba's mother). Not that this makes the racial balance of actors 'okay,' but just pointing out that Rafiki and the hyenas aren't the only characters voiced by actors of color.
@SleepsWithButterflies: thanks for the clarifications! i haven't seen the film in a long time and i had thought that james earl jones voiced scar not mufasa but now that im looking at it the wikipedia page, jeremy irons did scar which makes more sense since if im remembering correctly i believe scar had a british-ish accent. im not familiar with the other two women you mentioned, but i will look them up! #disneybridal
@KATE!: But how could you tell what colour skin the voice actor had, if you didn't IMDB them? I certainly can't. I'm not sure if this is part of being on the autism spectrum or what, though, and am perfectly willing to concede that others must be able to hear something I have no access to.
Ok, I take issue with Belle. Shesaved the prince with her kindness and forgiveness and refusal to give up on a guy just because he beats her up a few times. remember, ladies, no matter how many times he rages and destroys property, he's just a prince underneath that beast. #disneybridal
@KATE!: I think Belle is supposed to represent Christian charity. Unconditional love, forgiveness, do WJD. Don't give up on a hopeless cause. I think it's a pretty idea, and it's the reason why preachers counsel abused women to go back to their husbands. #disneybridal
@BytheSea: I read something a while back that said that Beauty and the Beast was trying to convince liberated women to not be upset or disgusted by hypermasculine displays of brutishness or violence and abandon conventional relationship structures, but to stick it out and try to "civilize" their wild men. #disneybridal
@KATE!: Uh....you got all of that from a cartoon? I mean, yes of course there are levels of meaning in any story but that's a LOT of subtext for a children's movie. #disneybridal
@5ft of fury: oh, you can draw MUCH MORE than that from that movie. in fact, i kind of think that that is a simplistic conclusion. there is a whole academic field devoted to the practice: film theory. film is a narrative art, just like literature, and can be analyzed in similar ways. they carry and reflect the ideas of the time, the culture and the author. and especially considering how big of a cultural impact the disney franchise has on western childhood, i dont think its too much of a stretch to look into these things closer.
the same article i read that talked about that the civilization of manhood (which really isnt that out there, its a pretty dominant meme that has strong roots in american intellectual history) talked about the "be our guest" number as a dehumanizing domestic workers by giving them an uncontrollable biological desire to serve their employers. without anyone to serve, they are unhappy and useless. as the song says, they only live to serve!
i personally think these alternate readings can take a rather dull source material and make it much richer and interesting.
@KATE!: I'm sure then that you have discussed the importance of not projecting anachronistic views onto antiquated stories. The stories are problematic, I don't think that many people are arguing with that. I do think it is a little dangerous though to be looking at a work of art or literature (often from another culture) and project our own modern, Western views onto the story. Can we criticize the story and find elements of it to be offensive today? Sure. Should we then say that since elements of it are no longer acceptable, we should just lock it up and never reference it culturally? Even if that were possible, I'd say no. Part of the reason we learn about history, anthropology, and the arts is to come into contact with ways of thinking that are different from our own (which helps when we have to deal with people who think radically different than we do) and to learn from the past. As a classicist, I'm all for alternative readings of material, but it's important to be able to support your conclusions within whatever material you are citing. #disneybridal
@5ft of fury: well, i was not the one who updated la belle et la bete in 1991, but i was a 6 year old girl who saw this reimagining in theatres and was, like many other little girls at that time and since then, totally obsessed with it. im not talking about the source material, im talking about the 1991 disney version that i was around for and had a temporal relationship with. hell, i didnt even know it was an adaptation until i was in my teens. and its not like the disney version is a purist adapatation at all.
i understand what you're trying to say, but we're not really talking about the traditional story that was handed down orally for hundreds of years. if we were then i would agree with you, but we're talking about the movie released across the world in 1991 that was the first and only animated film ever nominated for best film at the academy awards that continues to be one of disneys biggest cash cows and is still socially relevant enough to be parodied on SNL two weeks ago. #disneybridal
@KATE!: I think that in order to fully understand a) what in the story is flawed b) why it is flawed c) the historical context the original stories were created in and d) why it is still relevant today (because it's pretty clear the ideas in the original material are still relevant if we keep making movies out of these stories), then you have to talk about the traditional story in addition to the modern interpretations of it. #disneybridal
@5ft of fury: i think that knowing the historical background can inform an understanding, but i dont think it is necessarily necessary when what you are discussing is the cultural importance of a single version at a single historical moment. you could do a chronological analysis of the story over time, which would be fascinating, but it wouldn't change how the disney version interacts with the cultural at large. also, this is a fairy tale. its an oral tradition. we can't even trace it back to its roots! we've got the first written version from the 18th century, but we know it existed way before that. and thats kind of the best thing about fairy tales: is that they do change and adapt within the cultural and historic setting. each version is most relevant to its time and place because that is its origin and its scope of influence. and consider how liberally disney takes it artistic freedom. i haven't read the original written version, but if disney LITERALLY rewrote history in pocohantas i dont think it would be a big logical leap to assume that they reworked the narrative for modernity and would be more than willing to toss out anything that didn't suit their purpose, but they CHOSE to keep certain questionable aspects in. as they choose to do in all of their princess movies. #disneybridal
@KATE!: Any analysis that ignores the material that exists today that went before the primary material, is a flawed analysis, IMO. If you haven't read the source fairy tales, I suggest you do so. They are far more interesting and problematic than Disney's versions. Frankly, the fact that you are trying to shift the discussion to only Disney movies because you a) weren't born too much before Beauty and the Beast and therefore don't have any knowlegde of the story before (or outside of) it and b) the fact that you are trying to argue that you can have a comprehensive analysis without looking at the original source material because you have never read the original source material, really hurts your entire argument. Just because you didn't know much about Beauty and the Beast aside from the movie doesn't mean that when you start a discussion on analyzing fairy tales and gender roles you don't have to be informed. #disneybridal
"Betcha on land/they understand/Bet they don't reprimand their daughters/Bright young women/sick of swimming/ready to stand."
I have had this argument with countless people--people who claim that Ariel is the weakest of all because of her decision to give up her voice to get a man--absolutely not. She had an urge to go to the surface long before she met Eric (remember her grotto?). She became an archeologist of sorts, trying to learn about a (HUGE) new world with what she salvaged from under the sea. What other Disney princess (aside from Belle) had THAT much interest in something that wasn't sleeping, cooking (for dwarves), or cleaning (with mice)?
Ursula's MO--which Ariel questions and then eventually overcomes throughout the course of the movie--is that no one cares what a pretty girl has to say. Being the villain, doesn't it only make sense that her outlook is the polar opposite of what the prescribed 'good' way of thinking ought to be?
Ariel is the easiest target, yet she is likely the strongest of the princesses of described above. It's no wonder she, to this day, holds a special place in the hearts of 3 year olds AND 23 year olds (and many in between).
I have nothing to say about Snow White, however. She really should have tried harder. It was the thirties, but come on.
@famutime: That comment about Ariel was my first thought too. She had a crush on Eric mostly because he came from the place where awesome stuff like forks and music boxes are made. That he happened to be dreamy was just coincidence. She's totally brave, willing to go through serious physical alteration in order to gain abilities (walking) necessary to expand her world. She's quite a nerd for mechanical things, and she ends up a cultural ambassador, having overcome not just the limitations of society and biology, but also her overprotective father's mistrust of her strength and dedication. She totally changes her people's outlook on land-dwellers by the end. #disneybridal
@famutime: I can buy that she starts off strong but I don't agree that is how she ended. She might have been an archeologist of sorts but she ended up pretty much giving all that up for a guy she doesn't know and who doesn't know her. I do not believe that dreamily staring at each creates love. #disneybridal
@famutime: Ariel bugs me because she's so realistic. I last watched The Little Mermaid something like three years back and maybe it was the drugs talking (I'd just had my wisdom teeth out) but I was amazed by how dead-on Disney's portrayal of a sixteen-year-old girl was. Ariel was headstrong, passionate, mouthy, and overall immature, right down to the doing something incredibly stupid to get what you want because at 16 it's ZOMGthemostIMPORTANTthingEVER. Sure, she's all feminist in choosing her choices and whatnot, but girlfriend, you're sixteen, and I promise you that everything that's world-endingly important at 16 will have drastically changed by the time you're 20, 25, etc. I just wondered if she really turned out happy. #disneybridal
AGH AGH I'll go along with all the others, but that is NOT TRUE of Belle AT ALL (sorry for allcaps but I am young enough to feel very passionately about this film). Belle's sexuality is NOT her only asset, nor is it the way she saves the Beast (unless you conflate sexuality with love, in which case you have other problems to deal with). From the beginning, Belle is shown to be proudly individualistic, intellectual, loyal and ambitious. All of these things draw the Beast to her. Yes, she's beautiful, but that is a fundamental part of the original story - it's right there in the title. And she saves the Beast with tears, not with a kiss, remember. I can't even vaguely agree with that interpretation. #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: Yes. And if she only achieved things through sex she would have done it with muscley sexpot Gaston (he's especially good at expectorating!) #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: THIS THIS THIS. Exactly what I was thinking as I read this! Belle would be ashamed of herself if she ever used her sexuality to achieve something; furthermore, if she was ever going to, she would have used it on Gaston, who was already chasing her. #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: Seriously. Isn't the whole point of 'Beauty and the Beast' that love and respect, not sexual attraction, are the best basis for a relationship? #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: Yeah, but the original "Beauty and the Beast" story was written to get girls to not freak out that they were being forced to marry older beastly men they barely knew. I agree that Belle is a good character (she's not blonde! she reads!) but the story itself is fairly horrible. #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: I think Belle is all that but what bothers me is the Beast isn't. I don't think he really does anything to justify her devotion to him - and that pisses me off. It is like how we constantly see gorgeous, intelligent women on shows where the husband is such a prick. As if men are just entitled to women like that with no effort of their own. #disneybridal
@FizzyGood: I agree. Belle saved the Beast (not herself, BTW) with her compassion and open-minded nature.
On the occassions where she was saved it was usually by her friends, not her love interest. Friends that she made because she was loyal, interested, and interesting. #disneybridal
@CherriSpryte: I think that the film itself is enough of a departure from the source material that it doesn't really matter (to me). I know I brought up the original story, but I just meant that that the contrast between their appearances isn't something you could really change without turning it into to basically an entirely new story, whereas if that is the underlying message of the source material (which I wouldn't know) then they subvert it sufficiently within the film to justify that. #disneybridal
@Elaken: Well he does sacrifice his life (as far as he knows) so that she can go to her dying father, so in the end he puts her needs before his own. I think that's the point in the movie where you're supposed to feel like he's entirely redeemed himself (it worked for me). I mean, he was always a bastard, even before he got turned into a beast (albeit a pretty snazzy-looking beast in my opinion), and when she comes along he betters himself, which is maybe an unrealistic thing to show to young girls but within the narrative I think it works. #disneybridal
If you want to pick on Disney princesses, you really need to include Tiger Lily. She's an ethnic stereotype as well as being a damsel in distress and a temptress, and drawn as a sexualized preadolescent. #disneybridal
@JerkoftheMonth: Oh man, she was not Disney's most ethnically sensitive characters. Who knew Neverland was in the middle of the American Plains? #disneybridal
@Ipomoea: Tiger Lilly was part of Peter and Wendy, the original source material. She refuses to marry anybody else because she loves Peter best, and Peter saves her from Captan Hook (As much saving as can be done for somebody that boards the Jolly Roger willingly with a knife in her mouth, that is), which makes the Natives loyal to Peter and protects the whole Lost Boys-Peter-The Darlings group from a pirate attack.
Actually, the Movie is ten times better of a portrayal of Native Americans than the Play or Book, simply because in the Movie at least they didn't speak pretty much solely in grunts, and occasionally spoke actual words. #disneybridal
@Wibbles: I knew she was part of Barrie's original material, but are they specifically identified as NA by Barrie or just generic "other"? I remember being a kid andliking her better than Wendy because of the ship-and-knife escapade.
"occasionally spoke actual words" would be the key word about their lines, though. I clearly remember a lot of "how" and "heap big" in the film, which is pretty damn cringe-inducing.
Oh holy gawd. The actual text in Google Books uses both "Picaninnies" and "redskins" in reference to people, but from what I can gather, doesn't specify Tiger Lily and the "savages" as anything beyond "other". So I stand by the fact that Disney didn't need to decide to further the othering of native peoples by dropping Plains peoples into the middle of the movie. #disneybridal
@Ipomoea: well, all of the inhabitants of neverland are fantastical imaginings, either completely mythical (like the faeries) or the mythical fictions that are part of a highly romanticized past (like the pirates) and i think this is what Barrie was thinking of when he included an indian tribe.
negative representations of minority cultural groups are bad enough, but to other them to the point where you imply that they no long exist anywhere except a fantasy island? thats a whole 'nother kind of fucked up. #disneybridal
@Ipomoea: Indians were fun in the play b/c when it was written, Indians were an exciting, wild "other" that children wanted to run away and join. so yeah, they weren't exactly considered equals.
In the musical version I watched as a kid, with Mary Martin, Peter and Tiger Lily were like respected war generals of an equal band who united to fight a common foe. There was this song about, if i'm in trouble I'll call on you. someting like that. and there was a cultural exchange. #disneybridal
@jbrecken: Although at least she was rescued by another adolescent (Peter Pan). It'd be far more worrying if it had been a grown man swooping in to carry her off! #disneybridal
@Ipomoea: From the play, which came first, this is the first appearance of Tiger Lilly:
"The wood is now so silent that you may be sure it is full of redskins. TIGER LILY comes first. She is the belle of the Piccaninny tribe, whose braves would all have her to wife, but she wards them off witha hatchet. She puts her ear to the ground and listens, then beckons, and GREAT BIG LITTLE PANTHER and the tribe are around her, carpeting the ground. Far away some one treads on a dry leaf.
TIGER LILY. Pirates! (They do not draw their knives) the knives slip into their hands.) Have um scalps? What you say?
PANTHER. Scalp um, oho, velly quick.
THE BRAVES (in corroboration). Ugh, ugh, wah."
They then light a fire and dance around it and break a peace pipe. Yeah. It's THAT BAD, and it only gets worse. Even with the connotation of Piccaninny aside.
Besides these girls being rewarded for physical beauty, there is always some cliched way that the princess escapes evil and wins the prince with her "inner beauty," which basically translates to demureness and obedience and politeness. This is even more damaging than the emphasis on physical beauty. Most kids take it for granted that looks are not all that matters, but it is really disturbing how much these movies emphasize being demure and sweet. That is NOT to say that treating other humans with respect is not important. However, it just promotes the idea that girls should cultivate soft, nurturing, feminine, PASSIVE virtues.
It is especially harmful because:
a) It is more subtle and acceptable (even in 2009), and therefore easily internalized, than just "pretty people win."
b) Even when they are being nice, none of the princesses are ever actively thinking for themselves or solving their own problems.
That said, Mulan is an exception to all this. She is one of my favorite movie heroines ever :) #disneybridal
**Posted here and at contexts.org simultaneously**
Wow, as the author of the original chart, I have to say that I’m overwhelmed by the responses here and elsewhere. There are far too many comments worthy of response here, so I won’t even try to respond to all. I would like to clarify a couple of things.
First, obviously, when you grab an image from disney.com and gin it up to make a point, you’re going to sacrifice depth for impact. I fully admit that some of the conclusions ignore some specific aspects of a character’s…character. For instance: Yes, the prince only falls for Ariel after she can talk. Good for him. But if she hadn’t drastically changed her appearance would she even have gotten that chance? Maybe she would have, but we won’t know. She DECIDES that changing her body is the most direct route to getting his attention.
Secondly, I would like to point out that many of the “analyses” are very short not because of lack of thought, but because of lack of space. One could (and some no doubt have) write a whole dissertation on a single one of these characters. That wasn’t the idea here it was intended more as something to laugh about among friends and point out some of the flaws in these depictions of young women. I’m not sure how the image ended up here (or on some other sites) but clearly someone thought it was worth sharing. I wouldn’t mind if they’d given me credit, but I’m glad that others are (generally) enjoying it.
Finally, I guess I’ll take credit since it wasn’t attributed to me in the first place. My name is Jeff Brunner, I’m a librarian and the proud father of a little girl who will NOT be watching these movies. Anyway, thanks to all for interesting commentary. As I said, I never intended for this to get such a wide viewing, but I feel like it generally holds up.
I'm going to pick a bone with Ariel's deconstruction, and not just because I want to be her. She is strong enough to disobey her father, move to another realm of the world, and do something completely new and different to not just be with her beloved, but to experience parts (of your world) that she has never experienced before.
Yeah, yeah, she went under cosmetic surgery of sorts to be able to live with her hubby Eric, but she is pretty independent, no? #disneybridal
@JerkoftheMonth: Also, not being able to speak makes her powerless. That's when the witch is able to bewitch Eric with Ariel's voice.
Then again, maybe she wants legs just so she can do the nasty with Eric, which would be more difficult with her fins. Maybe sex wins after all... #disneybridal
@JerkoftheMonth: Not being able to speak didnt' make Ariel powerless. she had to overcome that the way many people overcome a disability. I think that's one of the most important aspects of the film, that the bodies we've got have many flaws and the things we love about them can go away. I think it's an important message to kids that you can use your ingenuity to outhink a challenge, as Ariel did with her pantomining etc. I know I got it when I was 9.
I have to say that I do not agree with the description of Belle (but that is my favourite Disney movie, so maybe Im biased).
Belle always struck me as an excellent character because she was smart and didn't try and hide her intelligence, despite enduring ridicule from an entire town. She also didn't marry the handsome asshole, or give into his advances. And, she saved the Beast, not because she was beautiful (which may have helped), but because she she loved him and allowed him the space to love her.
I agree that the Princess stories are flawed, but let's denigrate them all to stories of helpless women: a lot of them are about women going for what they want (and if that's love, so what). #disneybridal
@JLady: I loved Belle as a fellow bookish brunette. Belle read and wanted to explore the world. She ended up at the castle because she was rescuing her father, totally resists the Beast when he's a jackass, and ultimately fell in love with him because of his character, not his looks. (The scene where he presents her with the library would've made me go all pitterpatter too). #disneybridal
Jazmine still comes out as a bit of a BAMF. If somebody used magic on you to attach heavy golden chains to your neck or lock you in an hour glass you might need to be saved, too.
Honestly, the only thing that disturbs me about this chart is it shows how much thinner the princesses have gotten over the years. There is a website that shows the progression as well, but I don't remember the name.
A few inches appear to migrate up to the chest each decade. #disneybridal
@JerkoftheMonth: They are all thin, but they get thinner and thinner, especially in the waist. The differences are much more noticeable if you look at original art or clips from the movies, because in art where they are redrawn or drawn together, they are made to look more similar.
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/26/09
Yes, Ariel disobeys her patriarch of a father and is kinda a bad-ass rule breaking teenager, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a dreamy prince. Yes, Belle is a bookworm who would rather read that swoon over Gaston, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a beastly prince. Yes, Jasmine disobeys her patriach of a father and tries to escape an arranged marriage, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with a loveable street-rat.
Yes, Pocohantas disobeys her patriach of a father and promotes cross-cultual communication, but her story still revolves around her relationship with John Smith.
Yes, Mulan disobeys her patriach of a father and dresses in drag and goes to war, but her story STILL revolves around her relationship with her commanding officer.
you get my picture.
The modern princesses are given more subjectivity in the beginning of their stories and we like that, its a good thing, its a step forward. It makes them fuller characters than the princesses of the past. But the end of the stories is always the same; they always ends with validation through love and implied (if not explicitly shown) marriage. That independence that we loved as little girls because we could see in them ourselves, was always sacrificed for the ring in the end. #disneybridal
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
and i do think its teaching young girls things like this. how fucking obnoxious (and pervasive) is princess-culture? there are grown women who want to be/think they're princesses. most of us grow up and out of it, but some people just aren't able or willing to let it go. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
one of the reasons (middle-class western) women get married much later in life than they used to is because marriage used to end a woman's public life. the societal expectation was that upon marriage she would quit whatever job or schooling or whatever she was pursuing outside of the domestic sphere and go into the home to be a wife and mother, and women didn't like that restriction. we fought very hard to extend our lives outside of the domestic sphere so that a woman's narrative would continue on after her wedding day. things have changed, but the disney princesses haven't quite caught up yet. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
And your evidence for this is? The fact that there were two direct-to-video sequels? Which actually weren't sequels at all because the took place WITHIN the timeline of the original movie, before her happily ever and wedding?
"like it or not marriage is a valid feminist choice"
when did i say that it wasn't?
"Marriage doesn't have to be about the patriarchy forcing women to become chattel."
No, it doesn't have to be and most of the time I don't think it is. Sometimes it is though. Admitting this wont suddenly invalidate your marriage. Also, marriage means something A LOT different than it did 50 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 1000 years ago. What I was mentioning upthread was what marriage USED to be, not what it is now. Which is why i think the disney films are outdated. Women don't get married directly after (or during!) adolescence anymore and even if they do, the societal expectation isn't for them to shrink into the private sphere as they once did. #disneybridal
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/26/09
Then I had a friend tell me The Lion King is racist (unfortunately without explaining) which makes me wonder how many other things my white privilege makes me ignorant about. *sigh* So then I decided it would just be easier to not have kids - the world is way too complicated. #disneybridal
10/26/09
Although Rafiki the blue-bottomed baboon is another shining example of Disney's totally bizarre dialect decisions. And Scar is TOTALLY coded gay. So perhaps Lion King is a bit homophobic too? #disneybridal
10/26/09
10/27/09
And I mean, Ursula from The Little Mermaid was basically a fabulous, fat drag queen. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
An elephant graveyards aren't ghettos, at least not as understood in many African cultures. Historically elephant graveyards are seen a sacred due to the admiration of elephants. Elephants were admired because they had no enemies in the animal world - they are not afraid of anyone, and no other beast could conquer an them. Elephants were seen as rulers of the wild that could only die natural deaths, therefore the places where they died - elephant graveyards - were sacred. Now of course we know that some lion prides are skilled enough to kill an elephant (though it usually requires the entire pride to do so), and that elephants kill each other. Yet the sacred nature of an elephant graveyard isn't overlooked. That's what I saw depicted in The Lion King - you don't mess with sacred, mythical territory, and only irreverent animals would do so.
I know the socio-political elements of Disney movies, in this case The Lion King, are appealing. Surely sometimes/most of the time, reading those themes into the movie is beneficial. However, don't overlook the simplicity of what's being depicted, in this case, Africa. I think that the Disney folks did their research. #disneybridal
10/27/09
the objection is not that hyenas are the villains, but that villains are coded as the only poc in a very very white film.
think of the crows in dumbo, for the 90s. #disneybridal
10/27/09
Wild hyenas don't 'speak' at all, so I have no reason to comment on their voices. I understand your point about the actors portraying them, though, so I felt and continue to feel no reason to contradict you or add anything to your argument. I made no attempt to argue about the race of the actors portraying the characters. I'm also aware of the archetypal roles of various characters in The Lion King beyond only Rafiki, and I understand that socio-political readings of the movie can be correct, as I stated.
My goal was just to add a little African reality to certain things in the movie, that is all. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
the same article i read that talked about that the civilization of manhood (which really isnt that out there, its a pretty dominant meme that has strong roots in american intellectual history) talked about the "be our guest" number as a dehumanizing domestic workers by giving them an uncontrollable biological desire to serve their employers. without anyone to serve, they are unhappy and useless. as the song says, they only live to serve!
i personally think these alternate readings can take a rather dull source material and make it much richer and interesting.
10/27/09
10/27/09
i understand what you're trying to say, but we're not really talking about the traditional story that was handed down orally for hundreds of years. if we were then i would agree with you, but we're talking about the movie released across the world in 1991 that was the first and only animated film ever nominated for best film at the academy awards that continues to be one of disneys biggest cash cows and is still socially relevant enough to be parodied on SNL two weeks ago. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
"Betcha on land/they understand/Bet they don't reprimand their daughters/Bright young women/sick of swimming/ready to stand."
I have had this argument with countless people--people who claim that Ariel is the weakest of all because of her decision to give up her voice to get a man--absolutely not. She had an urge to go to the surface long before she met Eric (remember her grotto?). She became an archeologist of sorts, trying to learn about a (HUGE) new world with what she salvaged from under the sea. What other Disney princess (aside from Belle) had THAT much interest in something that wasn't sleeping, cooking (for dwarves), or cleaning (with mice)?
Ursula's MO--which Ariel questions and then eventually overcomes throughout the course of the movie--is that no one cares what a pretty girl has to say. Being the villain, doesn't it only make sense that her outlook is the polar opposite of what the prescribed 'good' way of thinking ought to be?
Ariel is the easiest target, yet she is likely the strongest of the princesses of described above. It's no wonder she, to this day, holds a special place in the hearts of 3 year olds AND 23 year olds (and many in between).
I have nothing to say about Snow White, however. She really should have tried harder. It was the thirties, but come on.
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/27/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/27/09
On the occassions where she was saved it was usually by her friends, not her love interest. Friends that she made because she was loyal, interested, and interesting. #disneybridal
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
@JerkoftheMonth: Oh man, she was not Disney's most ethnically sensitive characters. Who knew Neverland was in the middle of the American Plains? #disneybridal
10/26/09
Actually, the Movie is ten times better of a portrayal of Native Americans than the Play or Book, simply because in the Movie at least they didn't speak pretty much solely in grunts, and occasionally spoke actual words. #disneybridal
10/26/09
"occasionally spoke actual words" would be the key word about their lines, though. I clearly remember a lot of "how" and "heap big" in the film, which is pretty damn cringe-inducing.
Oh holy gawd. The actual text in Google Books uses both "Picaninnies" and "redskins" in reference to people, but from what I can gather, doesn't specify Tiger Lily and the "savages" as anything beyond "other". So I stand by the fact that Disney didn't need to decide to further the othering of native peoples by dropping Plains peoples into the middle of the movie. #disneybridal
10/26/09
negative representations of minority cultural groups are bad enough, but to other them to the point where you imply that they no long exist anywhere except a fantasy island? thats a whole 'nother kind of fucked up. #disneybridal
10/26/09
In the musical version I watched as a kid, with Mary Martin, Peter and Tiger Lily were like respected war generals of an equal band who united to fight a common foe. There was this song about, if i'm in trouble I'll call on you. someting like that. and there was a cultural exchange. #disneybridal
10/27/09
10/27/09
"The wood is now so silent that you may be sure it is full of redskins. TIGER LILY comes first. She is the belle of the Piccaninny tribe, whose braves would all have her to wife, but she wards them off witha hatchet. She puts her ear to the ground and listens, then beckons, and GREAT BIG LITTLE PANTHER and the tribe are around her, carpeting the ground. Far away some one treads on a dry leaf.
TIGER LILY. Pirates! (They do not draw their knives) the knives slip into their hands.) Have um scalps? What you say?
PANTHER. Scalp um, oho, velly quick.
THE BRAVES (in corroboration). Ugh, ugh, wah."
They then light a fire and dance around it and break a peace pipe. Yeah. It's THAT BAD, and it only gets worse. Even with the connotation of Piccaninny aside.
10/26/09
It is especially harmful because:
a) It is more subtle and acceptable (even in 2009), and therefore easily internalized, than just "pretty people win."
b) Even when they are being nice, none of the princesses are ever actively thinking for themselves or solving their own problems.
That said, Mulan is an exception to all this. She is one of my favorite movie heroines ever :) #disneybridal
10/26/09
Wow, as the author of the original chart, I have to say that I’m overwhelmed by the responses here and elsewhere. There are far too many comments worthy of response here, so I won’t even try to respond to all. I would like to clarify a couple of things.
First, obviously, when you grab an image from disney.com and gin it up to make a point, you’re going to sacrifice depth for impact. I fully admit that some of the conclusions ignore some specific aspects of a character’s…character. For instance: Yes, the prince only falls for Ariel after she can talk. Good for him. But if she hadn’t drastically changed her appearance would she even have gotten that chance? Maybe she would have, but we won’t know. She DECIDES that changing her body is the most direct route to getting his attention.
Secondly, I would like to point out that many of the “analyses” are very short not because of lack of thought, but because of lack of space. One could (and some no doubt have) write a whole dissertation on a single one of these characters. That wasn’t the idea here it was intended more as something to laugh about among friends and point out some of the flaws in these depictions of young women. I’m not sure how the image ended up here (or on some other sites) but clearly someone thought it was worth sharing. I wouldn’t mind if they’d given me credit, but I’m glad that others are (generally) enjoying it.
Finally, I guess I’ll take credit since it wasn’t attributed to me in the first place. My name is Jeff Brunner, I’m a librarian and the proud father of a little girl who will NOT be watching these movies. Anyway, thanks to all for interesting commentary. As I said, I never intended for this to get such a wide viewing, but I feel like it generally holds up.
10/26/09
10/26/09
Yeah, yeah, she went under cosmetic surgery of sorts to be able to live with her hubby Eric, but she is pretty independent, no? #disneybridal
10/26/09
Then again, maybe she wants legs just so she can do the nasty with Eric, which would be more difficult with her fins. Maybe sex wins after all... #disneybridal
10/26/09
10/26/09
Belle always struck me as an excellent character because she was smart and didn't try and hide her intelligence, despite enduring ridicule from an entire town. She also didn't marry the handsome asshole, or give into his advances. And, she saved the Beast, not because she was beautiful (which may have helped), but because she she loved him and allowed him the space to love her.
I agree that the Princess stories are flawed, but let's denigrate them all to stories of helpless women: a lot of them are about women going for what they want (and if that's love, so what). #disneybridal
10/26/09
10/26/09
She tamed a tiger, give her a break. #disneybridal
10/26/09
A few inches appear to migrate up to the chest each decade. #disneybridal
10/26/09
More Betty Draper than Joan.
10/26/09
[images.starpulse.com]
vs.
[disney-clipart.com]