"Straight" answers?! Ha! Dan Savage has been a columnist in the Voice, for, shit, 20 years, and we all know he ain't talking to no exclusively hetero audience.
I smell Marketing Fears all over the subtitle copy.
I'd be interested to hear peoples take on Dan Savage. I have to say, I do not care for him. His most recent comment about the Pitt. shooter just needing to get laid, sort of sealed the deal for me.
@bluebears: I have moments where I think he goes too far--like that one.
But his advice strikes me as extremely practical and non-judgemental--he knows what makes people tick sexually and he doesn't sugar-coat the reality of it. I also like that he never moralizes to people about their fetishes or kinks (provided everyone is a consenting adult).
@bluebears: Generally speaking, his sexual advice is sound and, as BeckySharper points out, non-judgemental...but he definitely has a thing about anyone who's overweight (fat = GROSS, to him) which bugs me...and for a public figure, he sometimes doesn't have a filter between what he's thinking and what he's saying.
@bluebears: I thought that was incredibly stupid and it seemed like Savage wanted to make some point and just tied it to that story out of convenience. However, I was much more outraged before I actually read Savage's column (rather than the quote about prostitution).
I love him, overall. He's not perfect, and I don't always agree with him, but he's always entertaining. And occasionally he'll apologize for previous advice.
@BeckySharper: I agree. I think he's sort of an asshole, which he would be the first to admit, and I have learned SO MUCH by listening to his podcast. I appreciate that he's willing to call people on their narcissistic bullshit while still being open and non-judgmental about just about any kink or fetish that exists. He is also obsessed with a future in which everyone will have their own sex robot, and it's hard to fault that.
@bluebears: I also don't agree with everything Savage writes, but I'm not sure that's a fair summary of what he said about that murderer. I think his main point was that men who were celibate (not by choice) for long periods of time, and who recognized that they were getting angry / bitter / resentful about it, should seek help sooner rather than later. He recommended seeing sex workers as well as maybe psychiatrists - not sure how I feel about that, but there you go.
@all: I hear what you're saying and I tend to agree about his advice in sexual matters. Its when he sort of wades into the political that he starts to put me off. Another example was his comments immediately following the election about African American voters being intolerant of gay people.
@bluebears: On the one hand, he certainly does a lot to "demystify" human sexuality, fantasy, and fetish. On the other, he can be hyperbolic, hypocritical, and disconcertingly abrasive.
@NefariousNewt: I will take his hyperbolic, hypocritical, abrasive, and stoned cookie-eating-in-the-microphone ass over Dear Abby's namby pamby bullshit any day. I'd rather have someone who's an asshole all of the time than an advice columnist who is terrified of offending anybody.
@CourtleyLove: Yeah, I def. oversimplified it. It just immediately pissed me off. I don't think seeing a sex worker is good advice at all for a person like the Pitt shooter. Psychiatric help? yes. Also I think Savage does his own oversimplifying there by proposing that a visit to a sex worker would alleviate these problems.
@Yahtzii: Well, anybody who wants sex advice is probably not going to seek it in Dear Abby -- at least, I would hope not! I just think that occasionally he tries to bash people's brains in with his advice, and I don't think that's necessary, given most people are probably embarrassed to some degree to be asking these questions in the first place.
@bluebears: That's the odd part of his advice: he can be very sensitive to people's various fetishes, but make sweeping generalizations about people in other areas.
@NefariousNewt: this is why he turns me off. Like you pointed out he can be a hypocrite. He is very accepting of some things and, to my mind, very narrow minded about others.
@NefariousNewt: No, but they do ask her for relationship advice. Savage isn't just sex, and I like that he's willing to tell someone to DTMFA. Whenever I've heard him beating people over the head with his advice, they usually deserve it. I've also heard him be very gentle and encouraging with someone struggling with a difficult relationship issue or an embarrassing personal problem.
@bluebears: I don't actually know much about him, just that I was really touched by his piece on TAL when he talked about his sexuality and religion. I didn't like what he had to say about the shooter either....at all.
I think he's an arsehole who's mostly very good at his job. His advice recently to a mother with a 14year old gay son was excellent.
@valhalla_i_am_coming: In his book 'The Kid' (about adopting his son), he talks about how lots of people in his family are overweight and he jokes it will happen to him when he gets older.
@Penny: Yeah, I am usually very touched by his pieces on TAL, which was how I came to read his column to begin with. I know that he's said that a lot of the column is tongue in cheek for entertainment purposes and thats fine, but he often uses it as a political forum and I think he needs to almost use another "voice" (if that makes sense) when he talks about those issues. His more serious TAL voice, if you will.
@ihateyourescalade: blarg. yes those are the only options in the world. there are absolutely no other advice columnists at all. why must you be so obtuse? /rhetorical
@bluebears: I like Savage. His column and his blog stray a little harsh, but if you've ever listened to the podcast, he can be incredibly sensitive and non-judgmental. I'm excited to see what he does with the show.
@bluebears: I think that his point was less that the Pitt shooter needed to see a sex worker - I read it as more that the judgmental nature of society towards sex work contributes to a culture where it seems that men are somehow owed sex by women.
@bluebears: I fucking love Savage. He has been a consistent source of no-bullshit sex advice for me since the early 90s, when I was just a dumb kid. He definitely isn't perfectly PC, but he is refreshingly honest and knows how to get peoples' attention.
I think his take on the Pitt. shooting is interesting, but if you read Slog (the Stranger's blog), he absolutely blasted the guys who perpetrate this "you deserve to fuck a young hot woman and if they don't get you, it's THEIR fault" theories. He put a lot of the blame on them, but I think the column focused a little too much on the idea that if he'd seen a sex worker (and he freely said he wouldn't want this guy to see any of his sex worker friends), he might not have shot up a room of women.
(Disclaimer: he lives near me, I've bet him a few times, so I'm pretty biased.)
Dan's advice depends on whether or not he's sober or hung over or in a bad mood or sick or at a family Thanksgiving dinner. Which only makes it more entertaining.
I've been thinking about the PUA community a lot every since Jezebel introduced me to the horror-that-is-Roissy. On top of everything else that has been so eloquently raised in the comments here, I think there is another, more fundamental problem.
I don't think men realise that a lot of women's "suck-up"-ness is because women's physical disadvantage means we have to put up barriers. Especially in nightclubs, at night time and in any other environment where men can be lecherous and women can be vulnerable.
One day when I was out riding my bike, my boyfriend and a male friend of mine drove past in the car and, recognising me, beeped at me. When they got no response, they slowed down and called out. I had been harrassed by about three other guys on my ride and I was at the end of my tether. When I told them to fuck off (not realising who they were) they were genuinely horrified - it had never crossed their minds that beeping at women and calling things out (things they had undoubtedly never done before) could be upsetting.
That was the day that I realised men really don't understand this one fundamental thing about women.
I also think this fear - even when it's pushed to the backs of our minds - makes us more suspicious of awkward, nervous or socially-inept guys, because they're the less predictable ones. And if there's one thing Law and Order has told us, it's the social outliers to watch out for. It's sad and unfortunate, but it undoubtedly makes things worse for genuinely shy or nice (as opposed to self-described "nice") guys who aren't comfortable.
I wonder how many men have "beeped" (in a metaphorical sense) at women in bars and thought they were bitches because they didn't respond in a warm and open manner.
This Sodini wanted a 18-19 year old virgin porn-star, "high quality" woman hanging off his arm as a trophy. He wanted something to make other men jealous. He probably had plenty of opportunities to get laid (free of charge!) or date, but the women probably weren't the "calibre" he wanted. He didn't care about women, he just wanted to brag he dated hot teenagers. If he were desperate for sex, he could have gotten it. If he really wanted a relationship, he probably would have gotten one. (Poor unfortunate blind fools!) He wanted a trophy. He couldn't win his trophy teen hottie so he behaved like a poor sport and shot up the gym.
Sodini's issue wasn't sex, it was insanity and entitlement. He wasn't just some poor lonely guy. In his crazy musings, you never see him express any kind of envy for guys who have been happily married for years. It was always about young, loose women. I don't even think getting with a younger woman would have changed things, he would have still found people to psychotically envy. The only thing that could have possibly prevented his rampage is a string of virginal 19 year olds agreed to sleep with him before he left them in a wailing puddle of grief because he wouldn't marry them.
Sex work isn't the issue, the issue is the insane entitlement some men have. 50 years ago men didn't think that having a string of casual relationships with very young women was possible, so they were happy being with reasonably attractive women around their own age. Most mentally stable men are still happy with this. Its the fringe group who buy into the myth that he is entitled to porn star sex with college students until his penis falls off.
But I'm really not convinced that visiting sex workers can often be a reasonable form of counselling. Not only does the guy have to be open to it (and not write her off as a cheap whore), the sex worker has to have a pretty advanced understanding of the different ways people interact romantically and be skilled enough to deliver the information in ways the john can use. A lot of trained therapists fall short in this area, so I'm not trying to disparage sex workers when I say I think the odds of a sex worker being able to help a guy who truly can't date aren't great, even if he doesn't have crazy unrealistic standards.
I think Savage is absolutely right and I can give a personal example why. I have been to John school (that is what happens when you solicit an illegal prostitute). Coming from a level of social ineptness that would put Sodini to shame, I can tell you that dating is out of the question for me. So, what would you have me do? Going to prostitutes results in arrest, dating is not an option and my sexual drive is part of human nature. This is where undoubtedly you will say I should try therapy. I have. That's what led to my trying to pick up a prostitute, since that was my therapist's advice. The solution, clearly, is legalized prostitution.
@alyt: Well, there is always masturbation. I'm not sure your therapist had the best advice. I think the problem with sex workers as a solution is that it creates a vicious and unhealthy circle. Guy thinks the only way he can get women is by paying, so he doesn't develop the skills to interact with women (sex workers are by definition easy), and is never able to develop healthy emotional intimacy with a woman. This is one of those cases where I think a mail order bride might be a legitimate option (even though I'm not generally a fan). Its a chance for a man to approach interested women and build a relationship through email where it is easier to handle social insecurity.
@clevernamehere: I don't like the mail-order bride option because it seems to attract abusive, manipulative douche-bags. The woman comes to this country and the guy can hold her green card over her head and exploit or abuse her and if she turns him in she runs the risk of being deported. Way more opportunity for abuse than hiring an independent call girl on the internet.
@My_Latest_Incarnation: I think the mail order bride industry is rife with human rights violations. ButAlyut is presenting himself as an extremely awkward guy. If he's not also a misogynist, it might not be a bad option to explore.
What a concept! We could also shoot prostitutes into space to fill holes in the ozone. We could also harvest their spare kidneys. And keep them on board ship to offer as ready payoffs to any invading Somali pirates.
Pro's are people too folks. Let's not throw them under the bus.
Hmm. I have major intimacy issues. I have a date coming up and it makes me want to panic and take some Xanax. But I don't go out killing people.
Then again, maybe my problem is I have no idea why anyone would want to go on a date with me, while this asshole thinks, or at least tries to think, that everyone should want him and he's too good for most of them. Self-loathing can manifest itself in a lot of different ways.
My brother like SOB only at this point I'd argue he's asexual, and more than that, he has pretty diverse standards of "attractiveness." I don't think he carries any entitlement....at this point he's resigned to asexuality. I'd say he's a borderline feminist too, just by talking to him and his responses when he peeks to my magazines (like Allure...ugh, guilty pleasures no longer so pleasurable).
I'm not sure if he still feels sexually frustrated, but he says he envies his more conventionally attractive, sexually experienced male colleagues at work, and said that if he didn't have regular contact with friends and siblings, he would go insane (and I believe him...his major depression escalated into serious OCD during college, where he was at his lonliest and most isolated).
I think I agree with Dan Savage...you could argue that a therapist is a like a special friend (or at least a well-meaning acquaintance) who is paid to provide a non-judgmental environment that focuses on your problems.
"Listening" (and thoughtful responses) is the service that some people have to pay for, while others can go to friends or family and get it for free.
Why should a heavily regulated, well-paid sex industry--one that protects workers from potentially violent assholes like Sodini and takes human trafficking/child prostitution at least as seriously as now--be any different?
(I realize some of the protests--it feeds into the notion that people have perpetual access to women's bodies, period. Doesn't that ignore the self-determination of women who would work in the sex indutustry, under ideal/legalized/heavily regulated circumstances? Doesn't it make the concept of "mutual consent" too narrow, to just say ALL sex work is like rape, because women have no choice over what they will and will not do? What if they DID have choices and could negotiated their boundaries while still earning a living? Again---couldn't you argue that my getting a therapist feeds into the false notion that I simply DESERVE someone who will listen to my complaints, someone whose expression of criticism or judgment will likely be more focused and restrained than even a friend's? Why is that any less necessary than sex, so long as the sex isn't violent? )
I will say this...I wonder how many sex workers' clients want to go to prostitutes because they insist on acts few women do willingly, even for money...things that are violent or especially degrading.
Whatever that portion is, if sex work was legalized and regulated (instead of underground and in the shadows), couldn't sex workers be better protected? Wouldn't that part of the market--of women wrangled into dangerous tricks for psychos--dry up? (I guess that's where trafficking would come in...hmm.)
I'm not sure sending Sodini to a sex worker -- even twenty years back, before he got so bitter -- would have helped as much as Dan Savage thinks it would have, but I can see the logic.
I'm a sex worker, and Dan is right that Sodini would likely be a horrible client, and maybe even dangerous. He might not have been dangerous back in 1991, but he would have certainly been the kind of douche to completely look down on the sex worker.
I do have clients who think of me as a person and treat me with respect. I also have clients who think I'm a worthless whore. And you know what? I don't actually care. Their money is just as good, and frankly I can always just remember that I'm young and hot and they're old and paying for it.
If George Sodini had been a douchey John for the last twenty years instead of marinating in his own bitterness, would he have shot up the gym? Would he have killed a sex worker instead? Would he have gotten his shit together before now and started dating actual women? Would he still just be a perpetual john with no outside dating life but a lot less anger? The sad truth is that we'll never know.
10/27/09
LiveLove#savagelove #dansavage #andysambergjoannanewsom
10/27/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
I smell Marketing Fears all over the subtitle copy.
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
But his advice strikes me as extremely practical and non-judgemental--he knows what makes people tick sexually and he doesn't sugar-coat the reality of it. I also like that he never moralizes to people about their fetishes or kinks (provided everyone is a consenting adult).
08/24/09
08/24/09
I love him, overall. He's not perfect, and I don't always agree with him, but he's always entertaining. And occasionally he'll apologize for previous advice.
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
@valhalla_i_am_coming: In his book 'The Kid' (about adopting his son), he talks about how lots of people in his family are overweight and he jokes it will happen to him when he gets older.
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
I think his take on the Pitt. shooting is interesting, but if you read Slog (the Stranger's blog), he absolutely blasted the guys who perpetrate this "you deserve to fuck a young hot woman and if they don't get you, it's THEIR fault" theories. He put a lot of the blame on them, but I think the column focused a little too much on the idea that if he'd seen a sex worker (and he freely said he wouldn't want this guy to see any of his sex worker friends), he might not have shot up a room of women.
(Disclaimer: he lives near me, I've bet him a few times, so I'm pretty biased.)
08/24/09
08/15/09
08/13/09
I don't think men realise that a lot of women's "suck-up"-ness is because women's physical disadvantage means we have to put up barriers. Especially in nightclubs, at night time and in any other environment where men can be lecherous and women can be vulnerable.
One day when I was out riding my bike, my boyfriend and a male friend of mine drove past in the car and, recognising me, beeped at me. When they got no response, they slowed down and called out. I had been harrassed by about three other guys on my ride and I was at the end of my tether. When I told them to fuck off (not realising who they were) they were genuinely horrified - it had never crossed their minds that beeping at women and calling things out (things they had undoubtedly never done before) could be upsetting.
That was the day that I realised men really don't understand this one fundamental thing about women.
I also think this fear - even when it's pushed to the backs of our minds - makes us more suspicious of awkward, nervous or socially-inept guys, because they're the less predictable ones. And if there's one thing Law and Order has told us, it's the social outliers to watch out for. It's sad and unfortunate, but it undoubtedly makes things worse for genuinely shy or nice (as opposed to self-described "nice") guys who aren't comfortable.
I wonder how many men have "beeped" (in a metaphorical sense) at women in bars and thought they were bitches because they didn't respond in a warm and open manner.
08/12/09
08/12/09
Sex work isn't the issue, the issue is the insane entitlement some men have. 50 years ago men didn't think that having a string of casual relationships with very young women was possible, so they were happy being with reasonably attractive women around their own age. Most mentally stable men are still happy with this. Its the fringe group who buy into the myth that he is entitled to porn star sex with college students until his penis falls off.
But I'm really not convinced that visiting sex workers can often be a reasonable form of counselling. Not only does the guy have to be open to it (and not write her off as a cheap whore), the sex worker has to have a pretty advanced understanding of the different ways people interact romantically and be skilled enough to deliver the information in ways the john can use. A lot of trained therapists fall short in this area, so I'm not trying to disparage sex workers when I say I think the odds of a sex worker being able to help a guy who truly can't date aren't great, even if he doesn't have crazy unrealistic standards.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/15/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Pro's are people too folks. Let's not throw them under the bus.
08/12/09
Then again, maybe my problem is I have no idea why anyone would want to go on a date with me, while this asshole thinks, or at least tries to think, that everyone should want him and he's too good for most of them. Self-loathing can manifest itself in a lot of different ways.
08/12/09
I'm not sure if he still feels sexually frustrated, but he says he envies his more conventionally attractive, sexually experienced male colleagues at work, and said that if he didn't have regular contact with friends and siblings, he would go insane (and I believe him...his major depression escalated into serious OCD during college, where he was at his lonliest and most isolated).
I think I agree with Dan Savage...you could argue that a therapist is a like a special friend (or at least a well-meaning acquaintance) who is paid to provide a non-judgmental environment that focuses on your problems.
"Listening" (and thoughtful responses) is the service that some people have to pay for, while others can go to friends or family and get it for free.
Why should a heavily regulated, well-paid sex industry--one that protects workers from potentially violent assholes like Sodini and takes human trafficking/child prostitution at least as seriously as now--be any different?
(I realize some of the protests--it feeds into the notion that people have perpetual access to women's bodies, period. Doesn't that ignore the self-determination of women who would work in the sex indutustry, under ideal/legalized/heavily regulated circumstances? Doesn't it make the concept of "mutual consent" too narrow, to just say ALL sex work is like rape, because women have no choice over what they will and will not do? What if they DID have choices and could negotiated their boundaries while still earning a living? Again---couldn't you argue that my getting a therapist feeds into the false notion that I simply DESERVE someone who will listen to my complaints, someone whose expression of criticism or judgment will likely be more focused and restrained than even a friend's? Why is that any less necessary than sex, so long as the sex isn't violent? )
I will say this...I wonder how many sex workers' clients want to go to prostitutes because they insist on acts few women do willingly, even for money...things that are violent or especially degrading.
Whatever that portion is, if sex work was legalized and regulated (instead of underground and in the shadows), couldn't sex workers be better protected? Wouldn't that part of the market--of women wrangled into dangerous tricks for psychos--dry up? (I guess that's where trafficking would come in...hmm.)
08/12/09
I'm a sex worker, and Dan is right that Sodini would likely be a horrible client, and maybe even dangerous. He might not have been dangerous back in 1991, but he would have certainly been the kind of douche to completely look down on the sex worker.
I do have clients who think of me as a person and treat me with respect. I also have clients who think I'm a worthless whore. And you know what? I don't actually care. Their money is just as good, and frankly I can always just remember that I'm young and hot and they're old and paying for it.
If George Sodini had been a douchey John for the last twenty years instead of marinating in his own bitterness, would he have shot up the gym? Would he have killed a sex worker instead? Would he have gotten his shit together before now and started dating actual women? Would he still just be a perpetual john with no outside dating life but a lot less anger? The sad truth is that we'll never know.
08/12/09
Sorry, that sounded really bad.