daniel vosovic - Jezebel

posts about #danielvosovic more →
Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
Kim Kardashian's Perfume "Truly...Speaks To My Fans" (What Does It Tell Them?!)
Lindsay Calls Cops Over Missing Phone; Kate Gosselin's Sleepover With The Bodyguard
Project Runway Is Back; Hopefully So Is Its Edge
Coming Soon: Team Sparklevamp Capitalism!
Chanel Haute Couture An Expensive Hit & Miss
Jay-Z-Owned Fragrance Company To Sell Scent Of A Mystery Female Artist
Home, But Not Alone
Press-Shy Celebrity Stylist Rachel Zoe To Star In Reality Show
No Love Lost Between J. Lo And Label's Former Designer

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

AuntieBee
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
Re: Naomi Campbell, fur v. nudity

I expect PETA can't actually contract all their "I'd rather go naked" models to never wear fur again. I also expect that, like Ms. Campbell, many of the models are not posing out of their deep-seated devotion to the end of the fur industry so much as out of a desire to have their profile raised. (Or money. Does PETA pay them, or is it pro-bono?)

I'm a little surprised this doesn't happen more often,but I suppose that is another reason they use celebrities more than models. Higher recognition factor and less likelihood that they will be paid to wear fur in future jobs.
Reply

AuntieBee was starred AuntieBee was unstarred

BondGirl
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
I'm sure Jezebel knows this but Anand Jon was on an episode of ANTM. They wore his dresses for a fashion show. I think it was cycle 2.
Reply

Hana Maru promoted this comment BondGirl was starred BondGirl was unstarred

Hana Maru
09/01/09

@BondGirl: I remember that! They got to go to a fashion industry party hosted by Anand Jon at the Indian Embassy. I always think of that when I read these rape stories. I thought he was so hot, but what a frightening man.
Reply

Hana Maru was starred Hana Maru was unstarred

foodandshoes
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
The only thing that bothers me about the photo of the homeless man is that the photographer didn't say "Hey, may I photograph you?" However interesting or cool you think someone's outfit is, they have a right to not be photographed. It's such a rude thing to just snap photos of a person so that you can use the image for your own entertainment, amusement, or employment.
Reply

Hana Maru promoted this comment foodandshoes was starred foodandshoes was unstarred

Hana Maru
09/01/09

@foodandshoes: I'm an amateur photographer and I take a lot of pictures of strangers. If I see an image, I may have seconds to catch it as it is. Often if someone notices that I'm about to photograph them, they'll start grinning and posing. Occasionally(If I think that they will see me) I'll try to gather consent through eye-contact and expression, while disturbing the scene as little as possible. I don't want to make somebody uncomfortable, and if they see me and frown and turn away, I won't persist, but I don't really understand how it's possible to be a Robert Doisneau/Ragubir Singh type photog. without secretly photographing people. Can you say more about why it bothers you? Is it because the guy may have been homeless, or is it always a problem?
Reply

Hana Maru was starred Hana Maru was unstarred

foodandshoes
09/01/09

@Hana Maru: So you take the photo and delete it if they say that they don't want to have their image used. I'm not all "the box steals your soul" or anything, but people have a right to say how their image is going to be used. That's why when you go somewhere where there is CCTV, it has to be disclosed. And as far as getting consent by eye contact, it just seems like the "she was smiling at me so she wanted the attention." I know that you aren't going to walk around with a stack of model release forms, but there is something that smacks of cultural imperialism/ethnography to me. It is different if the person is performing or something, but a regular person going about their day? It's a continuum that leads down to upskirt photos and the like. The person with the camera doesn't have the right to take a photo of anyone they want to.

An explicit okay from the subject is the ethical thing to do.
Reply

Edited by foodandshoes at 09/01/09 6:19 PM foodandshoes was starred foodandshoes was unstarred

Hana Maru
09/01/09

@foodandshoes: I use a film camera. And by getting consent by eye contact, I don't mean something ambiguous, I mean meeting eyes, tilting my head toward my camera as I hold it up, smiling at them, and waiting for a nod. It's not flirting or friendliness that I'm taking advantage of, it's real consent. At that point, however, they have become self aware, straightened their spine, and it ceased to be a genuine image of the moment in time and space that I wanted.

It does seem like you're a little bit "the box steals your soul" if you think that candid photography takes something from the subject, or that it's a slippery slope from photographing people going about their lives, to sticking cameras under women's skirts. When you say "it just seems like the"she was smiling at me so she wanted the attention." and reference upskirt pictures, it really sounds like you equate it with violating people.

I have felt okay about what I do because I have been photographed a lot by strangers in my time, and because most people are flattered if they notice. Also, because there are pictures that I regret not taking that will never exist again. Many of the great works of photographic art out there would not exist under the terms you're suggesting.
Reply

Hana Maru was starred Hana Maru was unstarred

BlondeGoddess
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
Has anyone seen the Celebration vid too? How totally awesome is Lourdes?
And how totally cringeworthy is it that Madonna is fondling Jesus in the same vid?
Reply

Edited by BlondeGoddess at 09/01/09 12:54 PM BlondeGoddess was starred BlondeGoddess was unstarred

katynels
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
Those Jimmy Choo boots are terrible. They're so Pretty Woman. No thanx
Reply

katynels was starred katynels was unstarred

desertbloom79
09/01/09

@katynels: Funny, I was just thinking those Jimmy Choo boots are awesome. They're so Pretty Woman. Yes, Please.

And now I'm actually laughing out loud at my desk.
Reply

Rooo sez BISH PLZ promoted this comment desertbloom79 was starred desertbloom79 was unstarred

Rare Affinity
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
Peaches Geldoff has also been appointed agony aunt for the London Evening Standard, as her years of experience make her ideally suited to advise others on difficult personal problems.
Reply

Rare Affinity was starred Rare Affinity was unstarred

Plum-Pie
09/01/09

@Rare Affinity: Thanks for providing me with my biggest laugh of the day, so far.
Reply

Plum-Pie was starred Plum-Pie was unstarred

lilbobbytables
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
The Sisters Mulleavy have signed with William Morris Endeavor, to "advise the label on opportunities in publishing and film and identify potential strategic partnerships and sponsorships." We're seeing a lot of intricate deconstruction.

Oh man, I have it in my head (and heart) that Rodarte will do some awesome costume for period movies. Imagine them dressing Catherine Earnshaw or Miss Havisham!!! Please do not take away this wonderful dream.
Reply

lilbobbytables was starred lilbobbytables was unstarred

toastandlove
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
We should start a Jez betting pool - every time a rapist gets sentenced, we'll do an over-under on how long they actually serve.
Reply

birminghamdrunk promoted this comment toastandlove was starred toastandlove was unstarred

cate3710
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
I was looking at The Sartorialist yesterday and saw that shot, and what bugged me was this: "I barely stopped walking when I took the shot" - it just made me wonder if he even talked to the guy or got his permission to take the photo and post it.
Reply

cate3710 was starred cate3710 was unstarred

lisas
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
I suggest that when it comes to images of rapists (and abusers like CB), Jezebel adopts the Perez approach to their pictures. I'd like to see DOUCHEBAG RAPIST OF GIRLS scrawled across this dickhead's smarmy little sexyface.
Reply

lisas was starred lisas was unstarred

berlitzfrench
09/01/09

@lisas: Couldn't fit all of that on there, but hope this will suffice:
Reply

lisas promoted this comment berlitzfrench was starred berlitzfrench was unstarred

Rare Affinity
09/01/09

@lisas: I would limit it to rapist of little girls and have it carved into their skin.
Reply

Rare Affinity was starred Rare Affinity was unstarred

lisas
09/01/09

@berlitzfrench: I feel cleansed by the fires of a fellow fury. xo
Reply

lisas was starred lisas was unstarred

lisas
09/01/09

@Rare Affinity: Country justice rides again, heh.
Reply

lisas was starred lisas was unstarred

Penny
09/01/09

In reply to Anand Jon Gets 59 Years For Rape, Cries.
I'm with Schuman. I thought a lot about this when Galliano did his "homeless" collection years ago, and my feeling is that everyone manages their appearance in some way, and it's pompous to assume all homeless people fall into one category. Perhaps he was thrilled to have his photo taken. I don't find it particularly violating.
Reply

Penny was starred Penny was unstarred

pssshwhatever
09/01/09

@Penny: I agree. If The Sartorialist is an examination of how people adorn themselves, it would be wrong to assume that homeless people are unable to have those concerns as well. Homelessness doesn't negate personality or personhood, and celebrating that like you would any other person merely reminds us that they are all, in fact, people.
Reply

EkaterinaBallerina promoted this comment pssshwhatever was starred pssshwhatever was unstarred

EkaterinaBallerina
09/01/09

@pssshwhatever: I couldn't agree more. There is a man that sits outside of my apartment on a daily basis. He loves to show off his t-shirt collection and he's always pointing out which one he's wearing.
Reply

EkaterinaBallerina was starred

Tchotchke
08/28/09

In reply to Kim Kardashian's Perfume "Truly...Speaks To My Fans" (What Does It Tell Them?!)
I love J. Crew's kid line for one big reason (adorable, Benetton-esq kids aside): their clothing looks like it is for children. When I was about 7 or 8, I remember the Limited Too was really popular. That store drove my mother insane because the clothing always looked slutty and tacky--like they were teaching six year olds that it was cool to want to dress like a desperate 30 year old divorcee. Crewcuts just looks age appropriate and combines wholesomeness, quirkiness and fun in just the right way. I'm glad that they are doing well.
Reply

greengrey promoted this comment Tchotchke was starred Tchotchke was unstarred

greengrey
08/28/09

@Tchotchke: I agree. Crewcuts are a bit pricey, but at least they are tacky/annoying. I'm sick of seeing sexual innuendo (IN YOUR END-O!) on kids clothes. Pink leopard print is bad on every age. Classic clothes work.
I feel SO old right now. Think of the children('s fashion)!
Reply

greengrey was starred greengrey was unstarred

Tchotchke
08/28/09

@greengrey: I know! Right now, my pet peeve is Victoria's Secret's line, "Pink". I know they claim its for college-aged girls and young women, but really? C'mon. Their clothing has puppies all over it and centers around hot pink. It's marketed toward tweens and I think it is beyond vulgar to see a ten year old wearing sweat pants that say "VS Pink" on the ass and a tank top cut just so that her VS bra shows.

For the last time, clothing makers: children are not sexy. Let it go. They should be carefree and not worrying about how big their breasts look in your new padded bra.
Reply

Tchotchke was starred Tchotchke was unstarred

HighSchoolFearleader
08/28/09

In reply to Kim Kardashian's Perfume "Truly...Speaks To My Fans" (What Does It Tell Them?!)
How can Kim have fans? What does she do that deserves fanfare? She lives her life, and she has fans? Do I have fans? Should I speak to them through scent? Kim, you always boggle my mind.
Reply

greengrey promoted this comment

greengrey
08/28/09

@HighSchoolFearleader: I hate to admit I'm kind of mesmerized by how pretty she is.
Reply

greengrey was starred greengrey was unstarred

labeled
08/28/09

In reply to Kim Kardashian's Perfume "Truly...Speaks To My Fans" (What Does It Tell Them?!)
Are you trying to say that Tim Gunn wasn't already a superhero?
Reply

labeled was starred labeled was unstarred

stacyinbean
08/28/09

In reply to Kim Kardashian's Perfume "Truly...Speaks To My Fans" (What Does It Tell Them?!)
Can I get a Tim Gunn action figure PLEASE? I've been asking for this forever, I want to take it shopping with me!
Reply

stacyinbean was starred stacyinbean was unstarred

bluelafrance
08/28/09

@stacyinbean: Oooooh! Wouldn't that be great. And then you push a button and he says, "Make it work!" haha! That would rock my face off.
Reply

ucelluccia promoted this comment bluelafrance was starred bluelafrance was unstarred

ucelluccia
08/28/09

@bluelafrance: Y'all know they exist, yes?

[shop.emmettmccarthy.com]
Reply

ucelluccia was starred ucelluccia was unstarred

bluelafrance
08/28/09

@ucelluccia: Awesome! Ordered!
Reply

bluelafrance was starred bluelafrance was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment